Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Motion is the Choreographer: Learning Latent Pose Dynamics for Seamless Sign Language Generation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Sign-language video generation can be split into an identity-free motion lexicon plus learned transitions, so that any signer can be rendered from a single recording per sign; the paper reports state-of-the-art results on PHOENIX14T.

desk verdict A promising lexicon-based take on sign language generation, but as submitted it is an incomplete draft with missing method sections and self-contradictory numbers—no referee can verify the claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04049 v1 pith:25OFZZ3O submitted 2025-08-06 cs.CV

Jiayi He , Xu Wang , Shengeng Tang , Yaxiong Wang , Lechao Cheng , Dan Guo This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords signlanguagegenerationmotionlexiconposedynamicsdiscrete-to-continuoussynthesisidentitydecouplingneuralrenderingPHOENIX14Tsignerpersonalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the bottleneck in sign language video generation is not appearance but motion: if the meaning-bearing movements of each sign are stored separately from who performs them, new sentences can be synthesized by stitching together isolated signs and filling the gaps with learned transitions. The authors build a multimodal sign lexicon by automatically segmenting continuous signing videos into discrete signs, keeping pose, hand, and 3D body sequences per gloss. A transition generator then turns a retrieved sequence of glosses into one smooth motion trajectory, and an identity-aware module renders that trajectory as a video of a chosen signer. On the PHOENIX14T benchmark, the method reports higher BLEU scores and better visual quality than prior signer-dependent approaches, suggesting that decoupling motion from identity is both data-efficient and effective.

What carries the argument

The central object is the signer-independent multimodal sign lexicon, a per-gloss store of identity-agnostic motion primitives (DWPose keypoints, HaMeR hand meshes, SMPLer-X 3D full-body meshes). The argument is carried by the discrete-to-continuous transition generator, which learns latent pose dynamics on 3D motion trajectories to produce smooth articulations between signs, and by the identity-aware video synthesis stage, which realizes the shared choreography with a chosen appearance.

What would settle it

Segment a held-out subset of PHOENIX14T with TwoStream-SLR and manually correct the gloss boundaries; if the corrected lexicon changes BLEU-4 or SSIM by more than a small margin on the test set, the pipeline's reliance on automatic segmentation is exposed. Also test single-example sufficiency by evaluating sentences whose glosses each appear only once in the lexicon: a large drop in motion quality or semantic accuracy would show that one recording per sign does not generalize across contexts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that sign-language video generation should treat motion, not the signer, as the generative variable. Each gloss is stored once as a set of identity-agnostic motion primitives — whole-body pose, hand detail, and 3D mesh sequences extracted with off-the-shelf estimators — in a multimodal sign lexicon built by automatically segmenting continuous signing videos. A discrete-to-continuous motion synthesis stage learns latent pose dynamics that connect retrieved gloss sequences into one temporally coherent trajectory, and an identity-aware rendering module turns that trajectory into a photorealistic video of a chosen signer. The authors argue that this decoupling makes

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that automatically segmenting continuous signing videos with TwoStream-SLR produces clean, complete, and semantically correct isolated sign units, and that one recording per gloss captures enough motion variability to generate natural, coherent signing for arbitrary novel sentences.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sign-language video generation no longer depends on large signer-specific sentence datasets; a compact lexicon of isolated signs plus transition generation is sufficient.
  • The same motion trajectory can be rendered with different identities, so signer personalization becomes a rendering-time operation rather than a retraining one.
  • Novel sentences composed from known glosses can be synthesized by interpolating between stored motion primitives, extending beyond the exact sentences seen in training data.
  • On PHOENIX14T, the method achieves state-of-the-art BLEU-1/BLEU-4 and SSIM/PSNR, supporting the claim that motion-first representation improves both semantic fidelity and visual realism.
  • The framework combines pose, hand, and mesh modalities, yielding better finger detail and 3D body consistency than single-modality baselines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If segmentation quality is the weak link, the lexicon's value depends on the TwoStream-SLR boundaries being semantically correct; a natural stress test is to corrupt or manually re-segment a subset and measure the downstream BLEU/SSIM drop.
  • The identity-decoupling idea could transfer to other motion-generation domains such as co-speech gesture, dance, or avatar animation, where a shared motion layer is rendered by different character models.
  • The single-recording-per-sign claim is practical only if coarticulation is absorbed by the transition generator; an evaluation on continuous signing with native-signer ratings would test whether synthesized transitions match natural coarticulation, not just retrieval metrics.
  • The paper's claim of vocabulary recombination could be tested by holding out gloss pairs during training and checking whether the transition generator can still synthesize coherent motion for unseen pairs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes MicT, a sign language video generation framework that decouples motion semantics from signer identity. It constructs a multimodal sign lexicon by segmenting continuous signing videos into isolated gloss units and extracting pose, hand, and 3D body modalities. A transition generator then converts discrete retrieved gloss motions into coherent continuous trajectories, and an identity-aware rendering module synthesizes videos of arbitrary signers. The paper claims state-of-the-art performance on PHOENIX14T, requiring only one recording per sign and no signer-specific full-sentence datasets.

Significance. If fully substantiated, the conceptual direction is valuable: treating motion as a portable 'choreography layer' could reduce data requirements and enable signer personalization. The use of an external benchmark and the absence of an obviously circular evaluation are strengths. However, the submitted manuscript does not provide a checkable version of its claimed contributions. The core methodology for transition generation and identity-aware rendering is absent, and the experimental results are cited through tables that are not present, with contradictory numbers. As it stands, the central claims are unverifiable rather than merely debatable.

major comments (4)
  1. [Comparison] The central performance claim is not supported by the submitted text. The Comparison section references Tables 1, 2, and 4, but no tables are included; Table 3 is missing entirely. More seriously, Table 4 is cited with incompatible numbers: 'BLEU-1 reaches 24.62 and BLEU-4 is 9.11' in the 'Smooth motion transitions' paragraph, but 'BLEU-1 (20.70/21.17) and BLEU-4 (8.45/8.55) on DEV/TEST' in the 'Ultra semantics and clarity' paragraph. The reader cannot determine which results are real. Please provide the actual tables with baselines, metrics, and error bars or significance tests.
  2. [Methodology] The manuscript stops after 'Multimodal Sign Lexicon Construction'. There are no equations, loss functions, network architectures, training details, or inference procedures for the 'transition generator' or the 'identity-aware video synthesis' module. The contribution bullet promises 'theoretical analysis' of vocabulary recombination, but no such analysis appears. These are not presentation issues; they are the two pillars of the abstract's claims. Without this material, the method is not reproducible and the qualitative/quantitative results cannot be attributed to the proposed mechanism.
  3. [Multimodal Sign Lexicon Construction] The pipeline rests on the assumption that automatically segmenting continuous signing with TwoStream-SLR yields clean, complete, and semantically correct isolated sign units, and that a single recording per gloss captures sufficient motion variability for arbitrary sentence generation. Neither assumption is validated. The manuscript should report segmentation quality (e.g., alignment accuracy, lexicon coverage), analyze failures, and provide ablations or sensitivity analyses showing how segmentation errors and lexicon size affect downstream generation. This is a load-bearing assumption, not a peripheral concern.
  4. [Experiments/Evaluation] Even if the tables were present, the text reports only point estimates without error bars, significance tests, or ablations. The claims of 'surpassing' and 'state-of-the-art' require statistical support, particularly because BLEU variants on generated videos can be sensitive to decoding and preprocessing choices. Please include multiple runs, confidence intervals, and ablations that isolate the contribution of each component (lexicon construction, transition generation, identity rendering).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract/Introduction] Typo: 'This achieves more greater data efficiency than conventional approaches' should be 'This achieves greater data efficiency...'
  2. [References] References Camgoz et al. 2018a and 2018b appear to duplicate the same paper with inconsistent venue information (CVPR vs ICCV). Please check and consolidate.
  3. [Figure numbering] The text refers to Figure 4 before Figure 3, and Figure 3 appears to be absent. Please renumber figures and ensure all are included.
  4. [Comparison] Minor typo: 'SignAliger' should be 'SignAligner'. Also, PTSLP and CogvideoX are mentioned in Table 2 but not fully identified in the references; please provide complete citations.
  5. [Qualitative Results] Figure captions are terse. For the qualitative claims, specify what is shown, how the transitions were generated, and how representative the examples are.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: claims are checked against external benchmarks and external method comparisons; missing tables undermine verifiability, not reasoning circularity.

full rationale

No circular step can be exhibited from the manuscript text. The method builds a multimodal sign lexicon by segmenting PHOENIX14T with the external TwoStream-SLR model and extracting pose/hand/3D cues with external estimators (DWPose, HaMeR, SMPLer-X); these are independent tools, not outputs of the proposed method. The claimed contribution is a discrete-to-continuous motion synthesis stage and identity-aware rendering, evaluated on the external PHOENIX14T benchmark against external baselines such as SignAligner, GEN-OBT, PTSLP, and CogvideoX. There is no equation in the text that shows the predicted quantity is defined as the fitted input, and no parameter is said to be fit to a subset and then reported as a prediction on a closely related quantity. Self-citations appear (e.g., Sign-D2C, SignAligner, Sign-IDD), but they are used as prior baselines or limitations, not as load-bearing justification for the paper's own central result. The reader-noted problems are missing tables and contradictory numbers for Table 4, which are issues of evidence and reproducibility, not circular derivation. Under the hard rules, missing support is not circularity, so the score remains 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several unverified modeling assumptions about the fidelity of automatically extracted motion primitives and the generalization of learned transitions. These are all domain assumptions with no independent evidence provided in the manuscript.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption TwoStream-SLR accurately segments continuous sign sequences into semantically correct discrete gloss units.
    Section 'Multimodal Sign Lexicon Construction' relies on this model to build the lexicon; errors propagate to all downstream stages.
  • domain assumption DWPose, HaMeR, and SMPLer-X extract pose, hand, and mesh representations that capture enough detail for subsequent video synthesis.
    These extracted modalities are the only motion representations used; if they lose important information, the final video cannot be faithful.
  • domain assumption A single recording per gloss is sufficient to represent that gloss across different contexts and signer styles.
    The abstract claims 'requiring only one recording per sign'; this is a strong assumption about sign variability.
  • domain assumption The learned transition generator can generalize to unseen gloss combinations and produce natural coarticulation.
    The paper claims 'generalizability to novel sign combinations through vocabulary recombination' but provides no proof or experiments for unseen combinations.
  • domain assumption The identity-aware video synthesis module can render photorealistic videos from 3D pose and mesh sequences.
    This module is central to the pipeline but its design is not described; its existence and capability are assumed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Motion is the Choreographer: Learning Latent Pose Dynamics for Seamless Sign Language Generation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/25OFZZ3O

@misc{pith2026250804049,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Motion is the Choreographer: Learning Latent Pose Dynamics for Seamless Sign Language Generation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/25OFZZ3O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04049}
}
read the original abstract

Sign language video generation requires producing natural signing motions with realistic appearances under precise semantic control, yet faces two critical challenges: excessive signer-specific data requirements and poor generalization. We propose a new paradigm for sign language video generation that decouples motion semantics from signer identity through a two-phase synthesis framework. First, we construct a signer-independent multimodal motion lexicon, where each gloss is stored as identity-agnostic pose, gesture, and 3D mesh sequences, requiring only one recording per sign. This compact representation enables our second key innovation: a discrete-to-continuous motion synthesis stage that transforms retrieved gloss sequences into temporally coherent motion trajectories, followed by identity-aware neural rendering to produce photorealistic videos of arbitrary signers. Unlike prior work constrained by signer-specific datasets, our method treats motion as a first-class citizen: the learned latent pose dynamics serve as a portable "choreography layer" that can be visually realized through different human appearances. Extensive experiments demonstrate that disentangling motion from identity is not just viable but advantageous - enabling both high-quality synthesis and unprecedented flexibility in signer personalization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ahn, J.; Jang, Y.; and Chung, J. S. 2024. Slowfast Network for Continuous Sign Language Recognition. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 3920--3924

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    E.; Mei, H.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, L.; et al

    Cai, Z.; Yin, W.; Zeng, A.; Wei, C.; Sun, Q.; Yanjun, W.; Pang, H. E.; Mei, H.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, L.; et al. 2023. Smpler-X: Scaling up Expressive Human Pose and Shape Estimation. Neural Information Processing Systems, 11454--11468

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    C.; Hadfield, S.; Koller, O.; Ney, H.; and Bowden, R

    Camgoz, N. C.; Hadfield, S.; Koller, O.; Ney, H.; and Bowden, R. 2018 a . Neural Sign Language Translation. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 7784--7793

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    C.; Hadfield, S.; Koller, O.; Ney, H.; and Bowden, R

    Camgoz, N. C.; Hadfield, S.; Koller, O.; Ney, H.; and Bowden, R. 2018 b . Neural Sign Language Translation. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 7784--7793

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Chen, Y.; Wei, F.; Sun, X.; Wu, Z.; and Lin, S. 2022 a . A Simple Multi-Modality Transfer Learning Baseline for Sign Language Translation. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 5120--5130

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Chen, Y.; Zuo, R.; Wei, F.; Wu, Y.; Liu, S.; and Mak, B. 2022 b . Two-Stream Network for Sign Language Recognition and Translation. NeurIPS

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    G.; He, Y.; Rahmani, H.; and Liu, J

    Gong, J.; Foo, L. G.; He, Y.; Rahmani, H.; and Liu, J. 2024. Llms are Good Sign Language Translators. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 18362--18372

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Gu, S.; Chen, D.; Bao, J.; Wen, F.; Zhang, B.; Chen, D.; Yuan, L.; and Guo, B. 2022. Vector Quantized Diffusion Model for Text-to-Image Synthesis. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10696--10706

    work page 2022

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Guo, D.; Tang, S.; and Wang, M. 2019. Connectionist Temporal Modeling of Video and Language: A Joint Model for Translation and Sign Labeling. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 751--757

    2019

  2. [10]

    Ho, J.; Jain, A.; and Abbeel, P. 2020. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models. Neural Information Processing Systems, 6840--6851

    2020

  3. [11]

    Huang, W.; Pan, W.; Zhao, Z.; and Tian, Q. 2021. Towards Fast and High-Quality Sign Language Production. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 3172--3181

    2021

  4. [12]

    Jia, W.; Huang, M.; Chen, N.; Zhang, L.; and Mao, Z. 2025. D\^ 2iT: Dynamic Diffusion Transformer for Accurate Image Generation. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 12860--12870

    2025

  5. [13]

    P.; and Ba, J

    Kingma, D. P.; and Ba, J. 2015. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 1--15

    2015

  6. [14]

    P.; and Jawahar, C

    Mazumder, S.; Mukhopadhyay, R.; Namboodiri, V. P.; and Jawahar, C. 2021. Translating Sign Language Videos to Talking Faces. In Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 1--10

    2021

  7. [15]

    G.; Stumbo, M.; Berke, L.; Bialek, M.; and Thomas, F

    McDonald, J.; Wolfe, R.; Schnepp, J.; Hochgesang, J.; Jamrozik, D. G.; Stumbo, M.; Berke, L.; Bialek, M.; and Thomas, F. 2016. An Automated Technique for Real-Time Production of Lifelike Animations of American Sign Language. Universal Access in the Information Society, 551--566

    2016

  8. [16]

    Othman, A.; and Jemni, M. 2011. Statistical Sign Language Machine Translation: from English Written Text to American Sign Language Gloss. IJCSI

    2011

  9. [17]

    Pavlakos, G.; Shan, D.; Radosavovic, I.; Kanazawa, A.; Fouhey, D.; and Malik, J. 2024. Reconstructing Hands in 3D with Transformers. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 9826--9836

    2024

  10. [18]

    Peebles, W.; and Xie, S. 2023. Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 4195--4205

    2023

  11. [19]

    Rombach, R.; Blattmann, A.; Lorenz, D.; Esser, P.; and Ommer, B. 2022. High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Models. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10684--10695

    2022

  12. [20]

    Sagawa, H.; and Takeuchi, M. 2002. A Teaching System of Japanese Sign Language using Sign Language Recognition and Generation. In ACM international conference on Multimedia, 137--145

    2002

  13. [21]

    C.; and Bowden, R

    Saunders, B.; Camgoz, N. C.; and Bowden, R. 2020. Progressive Transformers for End-to-End Sign Language Production. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 687--705. Springer

    2020

  14. [22]

    C.; and Bowden, R

    Saunders, B.; Camgoz, N. C.; and Bowden, R. 2021. Continuous 3D Multi-Channel Sign Language Production via Progressive Transformers and Mixture Density Networks. International journal of computer vision, 2113--2135

    2021

  15. [23]

    Segouat, J. 2009. A Study of Sign Language Coarticulation. ACM Sigaccess Accessibility and Computing, 31--38

    2009

  16. [24]

    Sohl-Dickstein, J.; Weiss, E.; Maheswaranathan, N.; and Ganguli, S. 2015. Deep Unsupervised Learning Using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 2256--2265

    2015

  17. [25]

    Song, J.; Meng, C.; and Ermon, S. 2020. Denoising Diffusion Implicit Models. In International Conference on Learning Representations

    2020

  18. [26]

    C.; Hadfield, S.; and Bowden, R

    Stoll, S.; Camgoz, N. C.; Hadfield, S.; and Bowden, R. 2020. Text2Sign: Towards Sign Language Production using Neural Machine Translation and Generative Adversarial Networks. International Journal of Computer Vision, 891--908

    2020

  19. [27]

    Stoll, S.; Hadfield, S.; and Bowden, R. 2020. Signsynth: Data-Driven Sign Language Video Generation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 353--370

    2020

  20. [28]

    Tang, S.; Guo, D.; Hong, R.; and Wang, M. 2022 a . Graph-Based Multimodal Sequential Embedding for Sign Language Translation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 4433--4445

    2022

  21. [29]

    Tang, S.; He, J.; Cheng, L.; Wu, J.; Guo, D.; and Hong, R. 2025 a . Discrete to Continuous: Generating Smooth Transition Poses from Sign Language Observations. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, 3481--3491

    2025

  22. [30]

    Tang, S.; He, J.; Guo, D.; Wei, Y.; Li, F.; and Hong, R. 2025 b . Sign-IDD: Iconicity Disentangled Diffusion for Sign Language Production. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 7266--7274

    2025

  23. [31]

    Tang, S.; Hong, R.; Guo, D.; and Wang, M. 2022 b . Gloss Semantic-Enhanced Network with Online Back-Translation for Sign Language Production. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 5630--5638

    2022

  24. [32]

    Tang, S.; Xue, F.; Wu, J.; Wang, S.; and Hong, R. 2025 c . Gloss-Driven Conditional Diffusion Models for Sign Language Production. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, 1--17

    2025

  25. [33]

    N.; Kaiser, .; and Polosukhin, I

    Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A. N.; Kaiser, .; and Polosukhin, I. 2017. Attention is All You Need. Neural Information Processing Systems, 30

    2017

  26. [34]

    Wang, X.; Tang, S.; Cheng, L.; Li, F.; Wang, S.; and Hong, R. 2025 a . SignAligner: Harmonizing Complementary Pose Modalities for Coherent Sign Language Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.11621

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Wang, X.; Tang, S.; Song, P.; Wang, S.; Guo, D.; and Hong, R. 2025 b . Linguistics-Vision Monotonic Consistent Network for Sign Language Production. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 1--5

    2025

  28. [36]

    Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Ma, X.; Zhou, S.; Huang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Yang, C.; He, Y.; Yu, J.; Yang, P.; et al. 2025 c . Lavie: High-Quality Video Generation with Cascaded Latent Diffusion Models. International Journal of Computer Vision, 3059--3078

    2025

  29. [37]

    Wang, Z.; Gao, W.; et al. 2002. A Method to Synthesize Chinese Sign Language Based on Virtual Human Technologies. Journal of Software, 2051--2056

    2002

  30. [38]

    Xie, P.; Zhang, Q.; Taiying, P.; Tang, H.; Du, Y.; and Li, Z. 2024. G2P-DDM: Generating Sign Pose Sequence from Gloss Sequence with Discrete Diffusion Model. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 6234--6242

    2024

  31. [39]

    Xue, W.; Liu, J.; Yan, S.; Zhou, Y.; Yuan, T.; and Guo, Q. 2023. Alleviating Data Insufficiency for Chinese Sign Language Recognition. Visual Intelligence, 26

    2023

  32. [40]

    Yang, Z.; Teng, J.; Zheng, W.; Ding, M.; Huang, S.; Xu, J.; Yang, Y.; Hong, W.; Zhang, X.; Feng, G.; et al. 2024. Cogvideox: Text-to-Video Diffusion Models with an Expert Transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06072

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Yang, Z.; Zeng, A.; Yuan, C.; and Li, Y. 2023. Effective Whole-Body Pose Estimation with Two-Stages Distillation. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 4210--4220

    2023

  34. [42]

    Yin, A.; Li, H.; Shen, K.; Tang, S.; and Zhuang, Y. 2024. T2S-GPT: Dynamic Vector Quantization for Autoregressive Sign Language Production from Text. In Association for Computational Linguistics, 3345--3356

    2024

  35. [43]

    Yue, Z.; Liao, K.; and Loy, C. C. 2025. Arbitrary-Steps Image Super-Resolution via Diffusion Inversion. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 23153--23163

    2025

  36. [44]

    Zhang, L.; You, W.; Shi, K.; and Gu, S. 2025. Uncertainty-Guided Perturbation for Image Super-Resolution Diffusion Model. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 17980--17989

    2025

  37. [45]

    Zhao, W.; Hu, H.; Zhou, W.; Shi, J.; and Li, H. 2023. BEST: BERT Pre-Training for Sign Language Recognition with Coupling Tokenization. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 3597--3605

    2023

  38. [46]

    Zhou, B.; Chen, Z.; Clap \'e s, A.; Wan, J.; Liang, Y.; Escalera, S.; Lei, Z.; and Zhang, D. 2023. Gloss-Free Sign Language Translation: Improving from Visual-Language Pretraining. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 20871--20881

    2023

  39. [47]

    Zhou, J.; Wang, B.; Chen, W.; Bai, J.; Li, D.; Zhang, A.; Xu, H.; Yang, M.; and Wang, F. 2024. RealisDance: Equip Controllable Character Animation with Realistic Hands

    2024

  40. [48]

    Zuo, R.; Wei, F.; Chen, Z.; Mak, B.; Yang, J.; and Tong, X. 2024. A Simple Baseline for Spoken Language to Sign Language Translation with 3D Avatars. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 36--54

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.