Deep Neural Network-Driven Adaptive Filtering

Gang Wang; Qizhen Wang; Ying-Chang Liang

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 77 references

Deep Neural Network-Driven Adaptive Filtering

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that embedding a DNN that maps filtering residuals to maximum-likelihood gradients lets adaptive filters generalize across non-Gaussian noise, with mean- and mean-square-stability guarantees.

desk verdict Genuinely novel framing—DNN mapping residuals to gradients inside the AF loop with ML as implicit cost—but with only the abstract in hand, the stability claims are uncheckable and the abstract overreaches from cost choice to 'exemplary generalization.' read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04258 v1 pith:QUTWVUVP submitted 2025-08-06 stat.ML cs.LG

Qizhen Wang , Gang Wang , Ying-Chang Liang This is my paper · ORCID

classification stat.MLcs.LG

keywords adaptivefilteringdeepneuralnetworkdirectgradientacquisitionmaximumlikelihoodnon-Gaussiannoisemean-squarestabilitygeneralizationuniversalnonlinearoperator

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Adaptive filters normally require the designer to pick a cost function—least squares, absolute error, a robust loss—and then derive an update by differentiating it. This paper proposes instead to train a deep neural network that takes the current filtering residual and outputs the learning gradient, and to embed that network directly inside the filter as the update mechanism. The implicit cost behind the mapping is maximum likelihood, so the gradient the network emits is meant to be the gradient of the log-likelihood of the observation under the assumed noise model. If the network is trained well, the filter becomes data-driven at the level of its update rule: it should adapt appropriately to non-Gaussian noise without the user committing to a specific noise model, and the authors provide mean-value and mean-square stability analyses for the resulting iteration. A sympathetic reader would care because this changes the design axis of adaptive filtering from selecting a loss to learning an update.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the residual-to-gradient DNN, embedded in the adaptive filtering loop as a universal nonlinear operator. Its defining job is to realize the mapping from the filtering residual to the gradient of the maximum-likelihood cost, so that updating the filter coefficients by this learned gradient replaces the usual chain of “choose a cost, differentiate it, simplify the update.” The validity of that map is what converts the closed-loop recursion into a stochastic gradient-type descent on an implicit data-driven objective, and the regularity and boundedness conditions imposed on the map are what the mean and mean-square stability proofs rely on.

What would settle it

Train the residual-to-gradient DNN on Gaussian residuals, then deploy it on heavy-tailed or skewed noise and compute the expected inner product $⟨g_{\mathrm{DNN}}, \nabla_\theta \ell\u27e9$ between the network output and the true gradient of the log-likelihood for the observed residual. If this inner product is non-positive at any iterate, or if the empirical mean-square coefficient error grows under the paper's stated step-size conditions, the claimed universal gradient behavior and stability are contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the adaptive filter's update need not be derived from an explicit cost function at all. Instead a DNN, treated as a universal nonlinear operator, is structurally inserted into the filter core and trained to invert the role of the residual: given the filtering error, it returns the gradient of an implicit maximum-likelihood cost with respect to the filter coefficients. The algorithm then uses that learned gradient to update the coefficients at each step. The authors argue that this direct gradient acquisition makes the framework inherently data-driven and endows it with strong generalization capability, and they report numerical experiments in non-Gaussian scenarios

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the trained DNN's output actually behaves as the gradient of an implicit maximum-likelihood cost in the deployment environment—pointing downhill on the true cost and satisfying the boundedness and smoothness conditions used in the mean- and mean-square-stability proofs; if the network's map fails either part, the update may not descend any real cost and the stability theorems would not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Filter design shifts from selecting a cost function to training a gradient map; deployment only requires evaluating the network on the current residual.
The update rule carries an implicit maximum-likelihood interpretation, so the filter remains meaningful when the true noise is non-Gaussian and not explicitly specified.
Mean and mean-square stability of the coefficient recursion follow from the network's gradient-like behavior and the associated moment conditions.
The framework can be validated empirically across a spectrum of non-Gaussian noise types without tuning a loss function per scenario.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension is to measure the cosine similarity between the DNN's output and the true maximum-likelihood gradient on held-out noise distributions: if the average angle exceeds 90 degrees at some iterate, the filter would be ascending the implicit cost.
The framework resembles learned optimization, suggesting a broader principle: any parameter-update rule that is a valid descent direction on a likelihood objective can be amortized into a neural map, connecting adaptive filtering to meta-learning and learned optimizers.
The stability theorems are conditional on the network preserving gradient-like behavior in deployment; if the noise distribution drifts far from training, the recursion may no longer descend any real cost, and the generalization claim would need to be restated as conditional on the learned map's validity.
Because the available full text does not match the abstract's technical content, the claimed derivations and experiments could not be inspected here; the summary above is grounded in the abstract alone.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a paper I want to see in full, but the abstract alone doesn't carry the weight of its claims. The central idea—embedding a DNN directly in the adaptive filtering loop as a universal residual-to-gradient operator, with maximum likelihood as the implicit cost—is distinctive. It's not the usual DNN-as-step-size-controller or DNN-as-filter hybrid. If the full paper makes good on the stability analysis and the non-Gaussian experiments, it would address a real gap in AF theory and practice.

What earns credit: the framing is clear and the authors identify the right weakness in traditional AF (explicit cost design limits generalization). Treating the DNN as a universal operator inside the core architecture is a conceptual shift, and the ML anchoring is a reasonable way to avoid pure black-box fitting. The promise of mean-value and mean-square stability analyses is exactly what the AF community would ask for.

Where I hesitate: the abstract claims that adopting ML as an implicit cost 'endows' the algorithm with 'exemplary generalization capability.' That's a logical leap. A cost function does not by itself guarantee generalization; the learned map must also be a valid descent direction on the true cost under deployment conditions, and the stability results will require regularity conditions (boundedness, moment/Lipschitz assumptions) that the abstract never states. The stress-test note puts its finger on precisely this: 'universal nonlinear operator' is a capacity statement, not a consistency guarantee. If the full paper proves that the learned map is the ML gradient, or at least a descent direction with bounded error, the headline claims hold. Without that, the stability theorems may only apply under training-distribution conditions that the experiments don't cover.

The metadata/full-text mismatch is a pipeline artifact; I'm not treating the rodent-behavior preprint as evidence about this paper. But it does mean I've only seen the abstract, so my verdict is provisional. The abstract's own claims are auditable: the leap from cost to generalization is unjustified as stated, and the stability analyses are referenced but not shown.

Who this is for: researchers in adaptive filtering, echo cancellation, and online learning who want to know whether learned gradient maps can replace hand-designed costs. It deserves a serious referee—the idea is strong enough to justify the time—but the referee should ask hard questions about the descent-direction property and the deployment conditions in the stability proofs.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as titled and abstracted, claims to introduce a deep neural network (DNN)-driven adaptive filtering framework that replaces explicit cost-function design with direct gradient acquisition: a DNN maps filtering residuals to learning gradients, maximum likelihood serves as an implicit cost, and mean-value and mean-square stability analyses are provided. The abstract further asserts that the resulting algorithm is 'inherently data-driven and thus endowed with exemplary generalization capability,' supported by numerical experiments across non-Gaussian scenarios. However, the full text supplied under this title is a completely different manuscript: a methodological review of machine learning tools for rodent social behavior analysis (Chindemi, Bellone & Girard, 'From eye to AI: studying rodent social behavior in the era of machine learning'). The body contains no adaptive filtering algorithm, no DNN-based gradient mapping, no maximum-likelihood derivation, no stability analyses, and no numerical experiments of the kind advertised in the abstract. The central claims of the abstract are therefore entirely unsupported by the submitted manuscript text.

Significance. If the claimed framework were actually developed and rigorously analyzed, it could be of interest to the adaptive filtering community: replacing hand-designed cost functions with a learned residual-to-gradient map, anchored to maximum likelihood, could offer a flexible approach to non-Gaussian noise environments, and explicit mean and mean-square stability analyses would be valuable. However, the submitted manuscript does not contain any of this content. The only technical artifact is the abstract; the body text is an unrelated review. Consequently, the potential significance cannot be assessed, and the manuscript in its present form makes no verifiable scientific contribution to the stated topic.

major comments (3)

[Full Text (entire body)] The body of the manuscript is not the paper described in the title and abstract. The abstract advertises a DNN-driven adaptive filtering framework with maximum-likelihood implicit cost, residual-to-gradient mapping, stability analyses, and numerical experiments. The full text is instead a review titled 'From eye to AI: studying rodent social behavior in the era of machine learning' with no equations, no algorithm, no convergence or stability theorems, and no adaptive filtering experiments. The central claims of the abstract are therefore unsupported by any of the submitted manuscript content. This is a load-bearing issue that cannot be resolved by minor revision; the manuscript must be resubmitted with the correct full text.
[Abstract, 'exemplary generalization capability'] Even taking the abstract at face value, the step from 'maximum likelihood is adopted as the implicit cost function' to 'inherently data-driven and thus endowed with exemplary generalization capability' is not justified. No training objective, no generalization bound, and no validation protocol are provided. As the reader's report notes, an ML cost function does not by itself guarantee generalization to deployment distributions. The absence of any supporting derivation or experiment in the full text makes this claim unverifiable.
[Abstract, 'mean value and mean square stability analyses'] The abstract claims that corresponding mean-value and mean-square stability analyses are 'conducted in detail,' but no such analyses appear anywhere in the submitted body. There are no recursion equations, no moment conditions, no Lipschitz or boundedness assumptions on the learned map, and no theorems. The reader's stress-test correctly identifies that stability results would require conditions on the DNN's output (e.g., descent direction properties, bounded moments); none of these are stated, let alone proved.

minor comments (2)

[Title/Abstract mismatch] The title and abstract refer to arXiv:2508.04258 (stat.ML), while the body text appears to belong to a different preprint (arXiv:2508.04255v1, cs.CV). The identifiers and content are inconsistent; this suggests a submission error that must be corrected.
[References] The reference list concerns rodent behavioral analysis and is unrelated to adaptive filtering or deep learning for signal processing. None of the cited works support the abstract's claims about DNN-driven adaptive filtering, maximum-likelihood gradient acquisition, or stability analysis.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the supplied manuscript is a rodent-behavior review, not the stated adaptive-filtering paper; no derivation chain is present, and the review's claims are externally grounded.

full rationale

The stated target is arXiv:2508.04258, a stat.ML paper titled 'Deep Neural Network-Driven Adaptive Filtering,' but the supplied FULL TEXT is a different preprint (Chindemi, Bellone & Girard, 'From eye to AI: studying rodent social behavior in the era of machine learning'). The adaptive-filtering abstract alone contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no derivation chain, so there is no specific reduction to exhibit under the hard rules. The rodent-behavior review that actually constitutes the full text is not circular: it surveys existing tools, benchmarks human annotation agreement on the external CalMS21 dataset (F1 = 0.79), and introduces BANOS metrics with an open-source implementation. None of its claims reduce to an input by construction; self-citations (e.g., Espinosa et al., Girard & Bellone, Contestabile et al.) serve as background neurobiology references rather than load-bearing premises. The text also explicitly acknowledges limitations of current tools and of algorithm-evaluation metrics. Therefore no significant circularity is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract names no explicit free parameters, but the DNN's learned weights are the de facto fitted values that define the algorithm, and a step-size schedule is required for any online gradient scheme. The framework additionally leans on three structural assumptions: universal approximation by the trained DNN, well-posedness of maximum likelihood under the noise scenarios, and regularity conditions for the stability analyses. None of these can be checked from the abstract.

free parameters (2)

DNN weights and biases of the residual-to-gradient map = learned from data (not reported in abstract)
The gradient operator is produced by a trained network; the resulting algorithm's behavior depends on these fitted values and on the training data. This is the de facto fitted quantity of the framework.
Step-size / learning-rate schedule = not reported in abstract
Any online stochastic-gradient-style adaptive algorithm requires step-size choices; the abstract does not state how these are set.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption A trained DNN can serve as a universal nonlinear operator mapping filtering residuals to valid learning gradients in every deployment environment
The whole framework rests on the DNN implementing the desired residual-to-gradient map; this requires an expressivity assumption and, implicitly, that training converges. Stated in the abstract: DNN 'functioning as a universal nonlinear operator.'
domain assumption The maximum-likelihood cost is well-posed for the noise scenarios considered
ML as implicit cost presumes a parametric noise model; for heavy-tailed or mixture non-Gaussian noise, ML can be ill-posed or multimodal. The abstract does not state the noise model family.
domain assumption Mean-value and mean-square stability results remain valid when the DNN gradient map is nonlinear and stochastic
Classical AF stability results require conditions such as bounded regressors, independence assumptions, or Lipschitz gradient maps. The abstract claims mean and mean-square stability without stating these conditions.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deep Neural Network-Driven Adaptive Filtering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QUTWVUVP

@misc{pith2026250804258,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deep Neural Network-Driven Adaptive Filtering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QUTWVUVP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04258}
}

read the original abstract

This paper proposes a deep neural network (DNN)-driven framework to address the longstanding generalization challenge in adaptive filtering (AF). In contrast to traditional AF frameworks that emphasize explicit cost function design, the proposed framework shifts the paradigm toward direct gradient acquisition. The DNN, functioning as a universal nonlinear operator, is structurally embedded into the core architecture of the AF system, establishing a direct mapping between filtering residuals and learning gradients. The maximum likelihood is adopted as the implicit cost function, rendering the derived algorithm inherently data-driven and thus endowed with exemplary generalization capability, which is validated by extensive numerical experiments across a spectrum of non-Gaussian scenarios. Corresponding mean value and mean square stability analyses are also conducted in detail.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

[1]

Neural Circuit Mech- anisms of Social Behavior

Patrick Chen and Weizhe Hong. Neural Circuit Mech- anisms of Social Behavior. Neuron, 98(1):16–30, 2018. ISSN 0896-6273. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.02.026

work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.02.026 2018
[2]

Hu, and Weizhe Hong

Ye Emily Wu, James Dang, Lyle Kingsbury, Mingmin Zhang, Fangmiao Sun, Rongfeng K. Hu, and Weizhe Hong. Neural control of affiliative touch in prosocial interaction. Nature, pages 1–6, 2021. ISSN 0028-0836. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03962-w

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03962-w 2021
[3]

Anderson

Mengyu Liu, Dong-Wook Kim, Hongkui Zeng, and David J. Anderson. Make war not love: The neural sub- strate underlying a state-dependent switch in female social behavior. Neuron, 110(5):841–856.e6, 2022. ISSN 0896-6273. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.002

work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.002 2022
[4]

Flanigan, Hossein Aleyasin, Long Li, C

Meghan E. Flanigan, Hossein Aleyasin, Long Li, C. Joseph Burnett, Kenny L. Chan, Katherine B. LeClair, Elizabeth K. Lucas, Bridget Matikainen-Ankney, Ro- main Durand-de Cuttoli, Aki Takahashi, Caroline Menard, Madeline L. Pfau, Sam A. Golden, Sylvain Bouchard, Erin S. Calipari, Eric J. Nestler, Ralph J. DiLeone, Akihiro Yamanaka, George W. Huntley, Roger ...

2020
[5]

Elum, Eric R

Jordan E. Elum, Eric R. Szelenyi, Barbara Juarez, Alexandria D. Murry, Grigory Loginov, Catalina A. Zamorano, Pan Gao, Ginny Wu, Scott Ng-Evans, Joshua X. Yee, Xiangmin Xu, Sam A. Golden, and Larry S. Zweifel. Distinct dynamics and intrin- sic properties in ventral tegmental area popula- tions mediate reward association and motivation. Cell Reports , 43(9...

work page arXiv 2024
[6]

Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning

Loren Martin and Erica Iceberg. Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning. Jour- nal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE , (102):53009, 2015. doi:10.3791/53009

work page doi:10.3791/53009 2015
[7]

Automated apparatus for quantitation of social approach behaviors in mice

JJ Nadler, SS Moy, G Dold, N Simmons, A Perez, NB Young, RP Barbaro, J Piven, TR Magnuson, and JN Crawley. Automated apparatus for quantitation of social approach behaviors in mice. Genes, Brain and Behavior , 3(5):303–314, 2004. ISSN 1601-183X. doi:10.1111/j.1601-183x.2004.00071.x

arXiv 2004
[8]

A novel system for tracking social pref- erence dynamics in mice reveals sex- and strain- specific characteristics

Shai Netser, Shani Haskal, Hen Magalnik, and Shlomo Wagner. A novel system for tracking social pref- erence dynamics in mice reveals sex- and strain- specific characteristics. Molecular Autism, 8(1):53, 2017. doi:10.1186/s13229-017-0169-1

work page doi:10.1186/s13229-017-0169-1 2017

Show all 77 references

[9]

Corticoamygdala Transfer of Socially Derived Information Gates Obser- vational Learning

Stephen A Allsop, Romy Wichmann, Fergil Mills, An- thony Burgos-Robles, Chia-Jung Chang, Ada C Felix- Ortiz, Alienor Vienne, Anna Beyeler, Ehsan M Izad- mehr, Gordon Glober, Meghan I Cum, Johanna Ster- giadou, Kavitha K Anandalingam, Kathryn Farris, Pra- neeth Namburi, Christo...

2018
[10]

Cerebellar dopamine D2 receptors regulate social behaviors

Laura Cutando, Emma Puighermanal, Laia Castell, Pauline Tarot, Morgane Belle, Federica Bertaso, Mar- garita Arango-Lievano, Fabrice Ango, Marcelo Ru- binstein, Albert Quintana, Alain Chédotal, Manuel Mameli, and Emmanuel Valjent. Cerebellar dopamine D2 receptors regulate socia...

2022 doi
[11]

Reciprocal cortico-amygdala con- nections regulate prosocial and selfish choices in mice

Diego Scheggia, Filippo La Greca, Federica Mal- tese, Giulia Chiacchierini, Maria Italia, Cinzia Mo- lent, Fabrizio Bernardi, Giulia Coccia, Nicolò Carrano, Elisa Zianni, Fabrizio Gardoni, Monica Di Luca, and Francesco Papaleo. Reciprocal cortico-amygdala con- nections regulat...

2022 doi
[12]

Torquet, F

N. Torquet, F. Marti, C. Campart, S. Tolu, C. Nguyen, V. Oberto, M. Benallaoua, J. Naudé, S. Didienne, N. De- bray, S. Jezequel, L. Le Gouestre, B. Hannesse, J. Mar- iani, A. Mourot, and P. Faure. Social interactions impact on the dopaminergic system and drive indi- viduality....

2018 doi
[13]

5-HT release in nucleus accumbens rescues social deficits in mouse autism model

Jessica J Walsh, Daniel J Christoffel, Boris D Heifets, Gabriel A Ben-Dor, Aslihan Selimbeyoglu, Lin W Hung, Karl Deisseroth, and Robert C Malenka. 5-HT release in nucleus accumbens rescues social deficits in mouse autism model. Nature, 560(7720):589–594, 2018. ISSN 0028-0836....

2018 doi
[14]

Beier, Boris D

Xiaoting Wu, Wade Morishita, Kevin T. Beier, Boris D. Heifets, and Robert C. Malenka. 5-HT modulation of a medial septal circuit tunes social memory sta- bility. Nature, pages 1–6, 2021. ISSN 0028-0836. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03956-8

2021 doi
[15]

Early Postnatal Shank3 Downregulation in the Nucleus Accumbens Impairs Performance in Social Conditioning Paradigms in Male Mice

Alessandro Contestabile, Giulia Casarotto, Benoit Gi- rard, Beatrice Righetti, Clément Solié, Camilla Bellone, and Stamatina Tzanoulinou. Early Postnatal Shank3 Downregulation in the Nucleus Accumbens Impairs Performance in Social Conditioning Paradigms in Male Mice. European ...

2025 doi
[16]

Responses and functions of dopamine in nucleus accumbens core during social behaviors

Bing Dai, Fangmiao Sun, Xiaoyu Tong, Yizhuo Ding, Amy Kuang, Takuya Osakada, Yulong Li, and Dayu Lin. Responses and functions of dopamine in nucleus accumbens core during social behaviors. Cell Reports , 40(8):111246, 2022. ISSN 2211-1247. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111246

2022
[17]

Insular cortex to ventral striatum synapses encode valence of social interaction

Pedro Espinosa, Benoit Girard, Mattia Lucchini, Feder- ica Campanelli, Valentina Tiriticco, and Camilla Bel- lone. Insular cortex to ventral striatum synapses encode valence of social interaction. bioRxiv, page 2022.11.08.515650, 2022. doi:10.1101/2022.11.08.515650

2022 doi
[18]

Nat- ural Neural Projection Dynamics Underlying Social Behavior

Lisa A Gunaydin, Logan Grosenick, Joel C Finkel- stein, Isaac V Kauvar, Lief E Fenno, Avishek Ad- hikari, Stephan Lammel, Julie J Mirzabekov, Raag D Airan, Kelly A Zalocusky, Kay M Tye, Polina Ani- keeva, Robert C Malenka, and Karl Deisseroth. Nat- ural Neural Projection Dynam...

2014
[19]

Neural dynamics in the limbic system during male social be- haviors

Zhichao Guo, Luping Yin, Takuya Osakada, Julieta Lischinsky, Jonathan Chien, Bing Dai, Ashley Urte- cho, Xiaoyu Tong, Zhe S Chen, and Dayu Lin. Neural dynamics in the limbic system during male social be- haviors. 2023. doi:10.1101/2023.03.12.532199

2023 doi
[20]

Revealing animal emotions

Benoit Girard and Camilla Bellone. Revealing animal emotions. Science, 368(6486):33–34, 2020. ISSN 0036-

2020
[21]

J. H. F. van Abeelen. Mouse mutants studied by means of ethological methods. Genetica, 34(1):79–94, 1964. ISSN 0016-6707. doi:10.1007/bf01664181

1964 doi
[22]

Learning Behavior Representations Through Multi-Timescale Bootstrapping

Mehdi Azabou, Michael Mendelson, Maks Sorokin, Shantanu Thakoor, Nauman Ahad, Carolina Urzay, and Eva L Dyer. Learning Behavior Representations Through Multi-Timescale Bootstrapping. arXiv, 2022

2022
[23]

Anderson and Pietro Perona

David J. Anderson and Pietro Perona. Toward a Science of Computational Ethology. Neuron, 84(1):18–31, 2014. ISSN 0896-6273. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.005

2014 doi
[24]

Anderson, Kristin Branson, Pietro Perona, and Andrew Leifer

Sandeep Robert Datta, David J. Anderson, Kristin Branson, Pietro Perona, and Andrew Leifer. Com- putational Neuroethology: A Call to Action. Neuron, 104(1):11–24, 2019. ISSN 0896-6273. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.09.038

2019 doi
[25]

Goodwin, Simon R.O

Nastacia L. Goodwin, Simon R.O. Nilsson, and Sam A. Golden. Rage Against the Machine: Advancing the study of aggression ethology via machine learning. Psychopharmacology, pages 1–20, 2020. ISSN 0033-

2020
[26]

Krakauer, Asif A

John W. Krakauer, Asif A. Ghazanfar, Alex Gomez- Marin, Malcolm A. MacIver, and David Poeppel. Neu- roscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias. Neuron, 93(3):480–490, 2017. ISSN 0896-6273. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.041

2017 doi
[27]

Big behavior: challenges and opportunities in a new era of deep behavior profiling

Lukas von Ziegler, Oliver Sturman, and Johannes Bo- hacek. Big behavior: challenges and opportunities in a new era of deep behavior profiling. Neuropsy- chopharmacology, pages 1–14, 2020. ISSN 0893-133X. doi:10.1038/s41386-020-0751-7

2020 doi
[28]

White, Linda M

Samantha R. White, Linda M. Amarante, Alexxai V. Kravitz, and Mark Laubach. The Future Is Open: Open-Source Tools for Behavioral Neuroscience Re- search. eNeuro, 6(4):ENEURO.0223–19.2019, 2019. doi:10.1523/eneuro.0223-19.2019

2019 doi
[29]

Eco-HAB as a fully automated and eco- logically relevant assessment of social impairments in mouse models of autism

Alicja Puścian, Szymon Łęski, Grzegorz Kasprowicz, Maciej Winiarski, Joanna Borowska, Tomasz Nikolaev, Paweł M Boguszewski, Hans-Peter Lipp, and Ewelina Knapska. Eco-HAB as a fully automated and eco- logically relevant assessment of social impairments in mouse models of autism...

2016 doi
[30]

Real-time analysis of the behaviour of groups of mice via a depth-sensing camera and machine learn- ing

Fabrice de Chaumont, Elodie Ey, Nicolas Torquet, Thibault Lagache, Stéphane Dallongeville, Albane Imbert, Thierry Legou, Anne-Marie Sourd, Philippe Faure, Thomas Bourgeron, and Jean-Christophe Olivo- Marin. Real-time analysis of the behaviour of groups of mice via a depth-sens...

2019 doi
[31]

A 3D-Video- Based Computerized Analysis of Social and Sexual Interactions in Rats

Jumpei Matsumoto, Susumu Urakawa, Yusaku Taka- mura, Renato Malcher-Lopes, Etsuro Hori, Carlos Tomaz, Taketoshi Ono, and Hisao Nishijo. A 3D-Video- Based Computerized Analysis of Social and Sexual Interactions in Rats. PLoS ONE , 8(10):e78460, 2013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078460

2013 doi
[32]

Dobkin, S

Ahmet Arac, Pingping Zhao, Bruce H. Dobkin, S. Thomas Carmichael, and Peyman Golshani. DeepBe- havior: A Deep Learning Toolbox for Automated Anal- ysis of Animal and Human Behavior Imaging Data. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience , 13:20, 2019. ISSN 1662-5137. doi:10.3389/fnsys...

2019
[33]

Automated measurement of mouse social behaviors using depth sensing, video tracking, and machine learning

Weizhe Hong, Ann Kennedy, Xavier P Burgos-Artizzu, Moriel Zelikowsky, Santiago G Navonne, Pietro Per- ona, and David J Anderson. Automated measurement of mouse social behaviors using depth sensing, video tracking, and machine learning. Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of ...

2015 doi
[34]

Deep-learning-based identification, track- ing, pose estimation and behaviour classification of interacting primates and mice in complex environ- ments

Markus Marks, Qiuhan Jin, Oliver Sturman, Lukas von Ziegler, Sepp Kollmorgen, Wolfger von der Behrens, Valerio Mante, Johannes Bohacek, and Mehmet Fatih Yanik. Deep-learning-based identification, track- ing, pose estimation and behaviour classification of interacting primates ...

2022 doi
[35]

Ebbesen and Robert C

Christian L. Ebbesen and Robert C. Froemke. Auto- matic mapping of multiplexed social receptive fields by deep learning and GPU-accelerated 3D videog- raphy. Nature Communications , 13(1):593, 2022. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28153-7

2022 doi
[36]

Zhang, Aneesh Bal, Haowen Zhou, Rachel R

Zexin Chen, Ruihan Zhang, Hao-Shu Fang, Yu E. Zhang, Aneesh Bal, Haowen Zhou, Rachel R. Rock, Nancy Padilla-Coreano, Laurel R. Keyes, Haoyi Zhu, Yong-Lu Li, Takaki Komiyama, Kay M. Tye, and Cewu Lu. AlphaTracker: a multi-animal tracking and behavioral analysis tool. Frontiers ...

2023
[37]

DeepEthogram, a machine learning pipeline for super- vised behavior classification from raw pixels

James P Bohnslav, Nivanthika K Wimalasena, Kelsey J Clausing, Yu Y Dai, David A Yarmolinsky, Tomás Cruz, Adam D Kashlan, M Eugenia Chiappe, Lauren L Orefice, Clifford J Woolf, and Christopher D Harvey. DeepEthogram, a machine learning pipeline for super- vised behavior classif...

2021 doi
[38]

Pearl, Sherry Lin, Mohammed Abdal Monium Osman, Libby Zhang, Sidharth An- napragada, Eli Conlin, Red Hoffmann, Sofia Makowska, Winthrop F

Caleb Weinreb, Jonah E. Pearl, Sherry Lin, Mohammed Abdal Monium Osman, Libby Zhang, Sidharth An- napragada, Eli Conlin, Red Hoffmann, Sofia Makowska, Winthrop F. Gillis, Maya Jay, Shaokai Ye, Alexander Mathis, Mackenzie W. Mathis, Talmo Pereira, Scott W. Linderman, and Sandee...
[39]

Goodwin, Jia J

Nastacia L. Goodwin, Jia J. Choong, Sophia Hwang, Kayla Pitts, Liana Bloom, Aasiya Islam, Yizhe Y. Zhang, Eric R. Szelenyi, Xiaoyu Tong, Emily L. Newman, Klaus Miczek, Hayden R. Wright, Ryan J. McLaughlin, Zane C. Norville, Neir Eshel, Mitra Heshmati, Simon R. O. Nilsson, and ...

2024 doi
[40]

The Mouse Action Recognition System (MARS) software pipeline for automated analysis of social behaviors in mice

Cristina Segalin, Jalani Williams, Tomomi Karigo, May Hui, Moriel Zelikowsky, Jennifer J Sun, Pietro Perona, David J Anderson, and Ann Kennedy. The Mouse Action Recognition System (MARS) software pipeline for automated analysis of social behaviors in mice. eLife, 10:e63720, 20...

2021 doi
[41]

Joeri Bordes, Lucas Miranda, Bertram Müller-Myhsok, and Mathias V. Schmidt. Advancing social behavioral neuroscience by integrating ethology and comparative psychology methods through machine learning. Neu- roscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , 151:105243, 2023. ISSN 0149-7634. ...

2023
[42]

Choi and Vivek Kumar

Jessica D. Choi and Vivek Kumar. A new era in quan- tification of animal social behaviors. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 157:105528, 2024. ISSN 0149-

2024
[43]

Pereira, Joshua W

Talmo D. Pereira, Joshua W. Shaevitz, and Mala Murthy. Quantifying behavior to understand the brain. Na- ture Neuroscience, pages 1–13, 2020. ISSN 1097-6256. doi:10.1038/s41593-020-00734-z

2020 doi
[44]

A paradigm shift in translational psychiatry through rodent neuroethol- ogy

Yair Shemesh and Alon Chen. A paradigm shift in translational psychiatry through rodent neuroethol- ogy. Molecular Psychiatry , pages 1–11, 2023. ISSN 1359-4184. doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01913-z

2023 doi
[45]

Deep learning tools for the measurement of ani- mal behavior in neuroscience

Mackenzie Weygandt Mathis and Alexander Mathis. Deep learning tools for the measurement of ani- mal behavior in neuroscience. Current Opinion in Neurobiology , 60:1–11, 2020. ISSN 0959-4388. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2019.10.008

2020 doi
[46]

Cury, Taiga Abe, Venkatesh N

Alexander Mathis, Pranav Mamidanna, Kevin M. Cury, Taiga Abe, Venkatesh N. Murthy, Mackenzie Weygandt Mathis, and Matthias Bethge. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nature Neuroscience, 21(9):1281–1289, 2018. ISSN 1097-6256. ...

2018 doi
[47]

Pereira, Nathaniel Tabris, Arie Matsliah, David M

Talmo D. Pereira, Nathaniel Tabris, Arie Matsliah, David M. Turner, Junyu Li, Shruthi Ravindranath, Eleni S. Papadoyannis, Edna Normand, David S. Deutsch, Z. Yan Wang, Grace C. McKenzie-Smith, Catalin C. Mitelut, Marielisa Diez Castro, John D’Uva, Mikhail Kislin, Dan H. Sanes,...

2022
[110]

Hewitt, Moi Hoon Yap, Emma F

Brett M. Hewitt, Moi Hoon Yap, Emma F. Hodson- Tole, Aneurin J. Kennerley, Paul S. Sharp, and Robyn A. Grant. A novel automated rodent tracker (ART), demonstrated in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Journal of Neuro- science Methods, 300:147–156, 2018. ISSN 0165...

2018 doi
[111]

Caiolfa, Emilio Ambrosio, En- rique Lara-Pezzi, and María Victoria Gómez-Gaviro

Elísabet Bello-Arroyo, Hélio Roque, Alberto Mar- cos, Javier Orihuel, Alejandro Higuera-Matas, Manuel Desco, Valeria R. Caiolfa, Emilio Ambrosio, En- rique Lara-Pezzi, and María Victoria Gómez-Gaviro. MouBeAT: A New and Open Toolbox for Guided Anal- ysis of Behavioral Tests in...

2018
[112]

Desh- mukh

Rajat Saxena, Warsha Barde, and Sachin S. Desh- mukh. Inexpensive, scalable camera system for tracking rats in large spaces. Journal of Neuro- physiology, 120(5):2383–2395, 2018. ISSN 0022-3077. doi:10.1152/jn.00215.2018

2018
[113]

Bergomi, Robert Hinz, Francisco J

Francisco Romero-Ferrero, Mattia G. Bergomi, Robert Hinz, Francisco J. H. Heras, and Gonzalo G. de Polavieja. idtracker.ai: Tracking all individuals in large collectives of unmarked animals. bioRxiv, page 280735,
[114]

Pennington, Zhe Dong, Yu Feng, Lau- ren M

Zachary T. Pennington, Zhe Dong, Yu Feng, Lau- ren M. Vetere, Lucia Page-Harley, Tristan Shuman, and Denise J. Cai. ezTrack: An open-source video analy- sis pipeline for the investigation of animal behavior. Scientific Reports, 9(1):19979, 2019. doi:10.1038/s41598- 019-56408-9

2019 doi
[115]

DeepPoseKit, a software toolkit for fast and robust animal pose estimation using deep learning

Jacob M Graving, Daniel Chae, Hemal Naik, Liang Li, Benjamin Koger, Blair R Costelloe, and Iain D Couzin. DeepPoseKit, a software toolkit for fast and robust animal pose estimation using deep learning. eLife, 8: e47994, 2019. doi:10.7554/elife.47994

2019 doi
[116]

Pereira, Diego E

Talmo D. Pereira, Diego E. Aldarondo, Lindsay Will- more, Mikhail Kislin, Samuel S.-H. Wang, Mala Murthy, and Joshua W. Shaevitz. Fast animal pose estimation using deep neural networks. Nature Methods, 16(1): 117–125, 2019. ISSN 1548-7091. doi:10.1038/s41592- 018-0234-5

2019 doi
[117]

Legaria, Julia J

Jonathan Krynitsky, Alex A. Legaria, Julia J. Pai, Mar- cial Garmendia-Cedillos, Ghadi Salem, Tom Pohida, and Alexxai V. Kravitz. Rodent Arena Tracker (RAT): A Machine Vision Rodent Tracking Camera and Closed Loop Control System. eNeuro, 7(3):ENEURO.0485– 19.2020, 2020. doi:10...

2020 doi
[118]

Schweihoff, Matvey Loshakov, Irina Pavlova, Laura Kück, Laura A

Jens F. Schweihoff, Matvey Loshakov, Irina Pavlova, Laura Kück, Laura A. Ewell, and Martin K. Schwarz. DeepLabStream enables closed-loop behavioral experi- ments using deep learning-based markerless, real-time posture detection. Communications Biology, 4(1):130,
[119]

3D pose estimation enables vir- tual head fixation in freely moving rats

Artur Schneider, Christian Zimmermann, Mansour Alyahyay, Florian Steenbergen, Thomas Brox, and Ilka Diester. 3D pose estimation enables vir- tual head fixation in freely moving rats. Neu- ron, 110(13):2080–2093.e10, 2022. ISSN 0896-6273. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2022.04.019

doi
[120]

Tony Fong, Hao Hu, Pankaj Gupta, Braeden Jury, and Timothy H. Murphy. PyMouseTracks: Flex- ible Computer Vision and RFID-Based System for Multiple Mouse Tracking and Behavioral Assess- ment. eNeuro, 10(5):ENEURO.0127–22.2023, 2023. doi:10.1523/eneuro.0127-22.2023

2023 doi
[121]

Lightning Pose: improved animal pose estimation via semi-supervised learning, Bayesian ensembling, and cloud-native open-source tools

Dan Biderman, Matthew R Whiteway, Cole Hur- witz, Nicholas Greenspan, Robert S Lee, Ankit Vish- nubhotla, Richard Warren, Federico Pedraja, Dil- lon Noone, Michael Schartner, Julia M Huntenburg, Anup Khanal, Guido T Meijer, Jean-Paul Noel, Ale- jandro Pan-Vazquez, Karolina Z S...

2023
[122]

ETHOWATCHER: validation of a tool for behavioral and video-tracking analysis in lab- oratory animals

Carlos Fernando Crispim Junior, Cesar Nonato Ped- eriva, Ricardo Chessini Bose, Vitor Augusto Gar- cia, Cilene Lino-de Oliveira, and José Marino- Neto. ETHOWATCHER: validation of a tool for behavioral and video-tracking analysis in lab- oratory animals. Computers in Biology an...

2012 doi
[123]

Reeves, Kelsey E

Sheldon L. Reeves, Kelsey E. Fleming, Lin Zhang, and Annalisa Scimemi. M-Track: A New Software for Au- tomated Detection of Grooming Trajectories in Mice. PLoS Computational Biology , 12(9):e1005115, 2016. ISSN 1553-734X. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005115

2016 doi
[124]

Im- proved 3D tracking and automated classification of rodents’ behavioral activity using depth-sensing cam- eras

Ana Gerós, Ana Magalhães, and Paulo Aguiar. Im- proved 3D tracking and automated classification of rodents’ behavioral activity using depth-sensing cam- eras. Behavior Research Methods, 52(5):2156–2167, 2020. doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01381-9

2020 doi
[125]

EthoLoop: auto- mated closed-loop neuroethology in naturalistic en- vironments

Ali Nourizonoz, Robert Zimmermann, Chun Lum Andy Ho, Sebastien Pellat, Yannick Ormen, Clément Prévost- Solié, Gilles Reymond, Fabien Pifferi, Fabienne Aujard, Anthony Herrel, and Daniel Huber. EthoLoop: auto- mated closed-loop neuroethology in naturalistic en- vironments. Natu...

2020 doi
[126]

Marshall, Diego E

Jesse D. Marshall, Diego E. Aldarondo, Timothy W. Dunn, William L. Wang, Gordon J. Berman, and Bence P. Ölveczky. Continuous Whole-Body 3D Kine- matic Recordings across the Rodent Behavioral Reper- toire. Neuron, 109(3):420–437.e8, 2021. ISSN 0896-6273. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.20...

2021 doi
[127]

van den Boom, Pavlina Pavlidi, Casper J.H

Bastijn J.G. van den Boom, Pavlina Pavlidi, Casper J.H. Wolf, Adriana H. Mooij, and Ingo Willuhn. Au- tomated classification of self-grooming in mice using open-source software. Journal of Neuro- science Methods , 289:48–56, 2017. ISSN 0165-0270. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.05.026

2017 doi
[128]

Cooke, Timothy P

Matthew B. Cooke, Timothy P. O’Leary, Phelan Har- ris, Ricky Ma, Richard E. Brown, and Jason S. Snyder. Pathfinder: open source software for analyzing spatial navigation search strategies. F1000Research, 8:1521,
[129]

A machine-vision approach for automated pain measurement at millisecond timescales

Jessica M Jones, William Foster, Colin R Twomey, Justin Burdge, Osama M Ahmed, Talmo D Pereira, Jessica A Wojick, Gregory Corder, Joshua B Plotkin, and Ishmail Abdus-Saboor. A machine-vision approach for automated pain measurement at millisecond timescales. eLife, 9:e57258, 20...

2020 doi
[130]

Whiteway, Dan Biderman, Yoni Fried- man, Mario Dipoppa, E

Matthew R. Whiteway, Dan Biderman, Yoni Fried- man, Mario Dipoppa, E. Kelly Buchanan, Anqi Wu, John Zhou, Niccolò Bonacchi, Nathaniel J. Miska, Jean-Paul Noel, Erica Rodriguez, Michael Schart- ner, Karolina Socha, Anne E. Urai, C. Daniel Salz- man, The International Brain Labo...

2021
[131]

BehaviorDEPOT is a simple, flexible tool for automated behavioral de- tection based on markerless pose tracking

Christopher J Gabriel, Zachary Zeidler, Benita Jin, Changliang Guo, Caitlin M Goodpaster, Adrienne Q Kashay, Anna Wu, Molly Delaney, Jovian Cheung, Lauren E DiFazio, Melissa J Sharpe, Daniel Aharoni, Scott A Wilke, and Laura A DeNardo. BehaviorDEPOT is a simple, flexible tool ...

2022 doi
[132]

Automated Segmentation of the Mouse Body Language to Study Stimulus-Evoked Emotional Behaviors

Gabriele Chelini, Enrico Maria Trombetta, Tommaso Fortunato-Asquini, Ottavia Ollari, Tommaso Pecchia, and Yuri Bozzi. Automated Segmentation of the Mouse Body Language to Study Stimulus-Evoked Emotional Behaviors. eNeuro, 10(9):ENEURO.0514–22.2023, 2023. doi:10.1523/eneuro.051...

2023 doi
[2019]

doi:10.12688/f1000research.20352.2

doi
[2021]

doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01654-9

doi
[2024]

doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02318-2

ISSN 1548-7091. doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02318-2

doi
[3158]

doi:10.1007/s00213-020-05577-x

doi
[7634]

doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105528

2023
[8075]

doi:10.1126/science.abb2796

doi
[8674]

doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.017

2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Neural Circuit Mech- anisms of Social Behavior

Patrick Chen and Weizhe Hong. Neural Circuit Mech- anisms of Social Behavior. Neuron, 98(1):16–30, 2018. ISSN 0896-6273. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.02.026

work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.02.026 2018

[2] [2]

Hu, and Weizhe Hong

Ye Emily Wu, James Dang, Lyle Kingsbury, Mingmin Zhang, Fangmiao Sun, Rongfeng K. Hu, and Weizhe Hong. Neural control of affiliative touch in prosocial interaction. Nature, pages 1–6, 2021. ISSN 0028-0836. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03962-w

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03962-w 2021

[3] [3]

Anderson

Mengyu Liu, Dong-Wook Kim, Hongkui Zeng, and David J. Anderson. Make war not love: The neural sub- strate underlying a state-dependent switch in female social behavior. Neuron, 110(5):841–856.e6, 2022. ISSN 0896-6273. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.002

work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.12.002 2022

[4] [4]

Flanigan, Hossein Aleyasin, Long Li, C

Meghan E. Flanigan, Hossein Aleyasin, Long Li, C. Joseph Burnett, Kenny L. Chan, Katherine B. LeClair, Elizabeth K. Lucas, Bridget Matikainen-Ankney, Ro- main Durand-de Cuttoli, Aki Takahashi, Caroline Menard, Madeline L. Pfau, Sam A. Golden, Sylvain Bouchard, Erin S. Calipari, Eric J. Nestler, Ralph J. DiLeone, Akihiro Yamanaka, George W. Huntley, Roger ...

2020

[5] [5]

Elum, Eric R

Jordan E. Elum, Eric R. Szelenyi, Barbara Juarez, Alexandria D. Murry, Grigory Loginov, Catalina A. Zamorano, Pan Gao, Ginny Wu, Scott Ng-Evans, Joshua X. Yee, Xiangmin Xu, Sam A. Golden, and Larry S. Zweifel. Distinct dynamics and intrin- sic properties in ventral tegmental area popula- tions mediate reward association and motivation. Cell Reports , 43(9...

work page arXiv 2024

[6] [6]

Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning

Loren Martin and Erica Iceberg. Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning. Jour- nal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE , (102):53009, 2015. doi:10.3791/53009

work page doi:10.3791/53009 2015

[7] [7]

Automated apparatus for quantitation of social approach behaviors in mice

JJ Nadler, SS Moy, G Dold, N Simmons, A Perez, NB Young, RP Barbaro, J Piven, TR Magnuson, and JN Crawley. Automated apparatus for quantitation of social approach behaviors in mice. Genes, Brain and Behavior , 3(5):303–314, 2004. ISSN 1601-183X. doi:10.1111/j.1601-183x.2004.00071.x

arXiv 2004

[8] [8]

A novel system for tracking social pref- erence dynamics in mice reveals sex- and strain- specific characteristics

Shai Netser, Shani Haskal, Hen Magalnik, and Shlomo Wagner. A novel system for tracking social pref- erence dynamics in mice reveals sex- and strain- specific characteristics. Molecular Autism, 8(1):53, 2017. doi:10.1186/s13229-017-0169-1

work page doi:10.1186/s13229-017-0169-1 2017