Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 73 references

On the spatio-temporal increments of nonlinear parabolic SPDEs and the open KPZ equation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For nonlinear parabolic SPDEs on a bounded interval, the paper identifies exact local and uniform spatio-temporal moduli of continuity matching the linear Gaussian field, and carries them to the open KPZ equation.

desk verdict Solid paper with new exact moduli for nonlinear SPDEs on bounded intervals; the main results look right, but Proposition 4.10 overclaims domain scope and needs a patch for boundary extensions. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05032 v3 pith:3BHSV4B6 submitted 2025-08-07 math.PR

Jingwu Hu , Cheuk Yin Lee This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PR MSC 60H1560G17
keywords stochasticpartialdifferentialequationheatopenKPZlawoftheiteratedlogarithmmoduluscontinuitysmall-ballprobabilitiesstronglocalnon-determinismRobinboundaryconditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the sample functions of a broad class of nonlinear parabolic SPDEs on a bounded interval oscillate at exactly the rates of the underlying linear stochastic heat equation, with only the noise coefficient $\sigma$ evaluated at the solution as a modulating factor. At a fixed space-time point, spatio-temporal increments are almost surely of size $|\sigma(u(z_0))|\,\rho(z,z_0)\sqrt{\log\log(1/\rho(z,z_0))}$; uniformly over an interior rectangle, the increments are of size $|\sigma(u(z))|\,\rho(z,z')\sqrt{\log(1/\rho(z,z'))}$ with a positive finite constant. These rates are sharp, so the nonlinearity and drift do not change the leading oscillation law. The results imply the existence of random exceptional points where increments are anomalously large, and prove matching small-ball probabilities and a Chung-type law of the iterated logarithm. The same moduli, with the same constants, hold for the open KPZ equation through its Hopf-Cole solution.

What carries the argument

Strong local non-determinism (SLND): the property that the conditional variance of a Gaussian field at a point given finitely many other points is bounded below by a constant times the minimum of the increment variances. The paper proves sharp SLND for the linear stochastic heat equation under Dirichlet, Neumann, and Robin boundary conditions, with matching two-point variance bounds $\mathrm{Var}(w(t,x)-w(s,y))\asymp \rho^2((t,x),(s,y))$ up to boundary factors. This is combined with detailed linearization-error estimates showing that $E(z;z'):=u(z')-u(z)-(G*u_0)(z')+(G*u_0)(z)-\sigma(u(z))(w(z')-w(z))$ is $o(\rho^p)$ for every $p<\zeta$ with $\zeta>1$, almost surely. These two ingredients le

What would settle it

Take $\sigma(u)=u$, $b=0$, zero initial data $u_0=0$, and Neumann boundary: the unique solution is $u\equiv0$, so $\sigma^{-1}\{0\}$ is not polar and $|\sigma(u(z))|=0$ everywhere; the quotient in (1.5) is not defined at any point. This example shows the polarity hypothesis is genuinely needed, and any claim that (1.5) holds without it can be refuted by checking this case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Let $u$ be the mild solution to $\partial_t u=\frac12\partial_x^2u+b(u)+\sigma(u)\xi$ on $(0,L)$ under Dirichlet, Neumann, or Robin boundary conditions. The paper's main claim is that for every fixed $z_0=(t_0,x_0)\in(0,\infty)\times(0,L)$ there is a constant $K_0\in(0,\infty)$ such that $$\lim_{\varepsilon\to0+}\sup_{z\in B^*_\rho(z_0,\varepsilon)}\frac{|u(z)-u(z_0)|}{\rho(z,z_0)\sqrt{\log\log(1/\rho(z,z_0))}}=K_0|\$\sigma$(u(z_0))|\quad\text{a.s.}$$ and, under the assumption that $\sigma^{-1}\{0\}$ is polar for $u$, for every interior rectangle $I$ there is $K\in(0,\infty)$ such that $$\lim_{\varepsilon\to0+}\sup_{z,z'\in I:0<\rho(z,z')\le\varepsilon}\frac{|u(z')-u(z)|}{|\$\sigma$(u(z))|\rho(z,z

Load-bearing premise

The uniform-modulus and exceptional-set results require that the set where $\sigma$ vanishes is polar for $u$, so $|\sigma(u(z))|$ stays almost surely bounded away from zero on each interior interval; for a general Lipschitz $\sigma$ this is not automatic, and without it the right side of (1.5) is undefined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Sample paths are in $\bigcap_{\alpha<1/4,\beta<1/2}C^{\alpha,\beta}(I)$ but not in $C^{1/4,1/2}(I)$; the logarithmic correction is sharp, not an artifact of the proof.
  • There exist random, dense, Lebesgue-null exceptional sets inside every interior rectangle at which spatio-temporal increments exceed the fixed-point law of the iterated logarithm by a logarithmic factor.
  • Matching small-ball bounds hold with exponent $(r/\varepsilon)^6$, giving a Chung-type LIL: $\liminf_{\varepsilon\to0+}(\log\log(1/\varepsilon))^{1/6}\varepsilon^{-1}\sup_{B_\rho(z_0,\varepsilon)}|u-u(z_0)|=C_2|\sigma(u(z_0))|$ a.s.
  • For the open KPZ equation, the same local and uniform moduli and Chung-type LIL hold with the same constants as for the linear stochastic heat equation.
  • The full statements are valid under Dirichlet, Neumann, and Robin boundary conditions; under Dirichlet and Neumann the variance and SLND bounds match up to the boundary and to $t=0$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method's reliance on crude heat-kernel bounds rather than Gaussian bounds suggests the same exact-moduli transfer should work for more general second-order operators and rough domains, provided an SLND estimate can be proven; this is an extension the paper itself leaves implicit.
  • The constants $K_0$ and $K$ are proven finite and positive but not computed; an editorial guess is that $K$ is the parabolic-metric analog of the Brownian modulus constant, so it may be expressible in terms of metric entropy of the rectangle.
  • For a general Lipschitz $\sigma$ that attains zero, the uniform modulus with denominator $|\sigma(u(z))|$ cannot be the right normalization: points where $\sigma(u(z))=0$ would make the ratio blow up or be undefined, so a modified statement with a different weight would be needed.
  • The small-ball exponent $1/6$ reflects the parabolic scaling dimension $1+2=3$ in the exponent $(r/\varepsilon)^6$; this suggests that for colored noise or different boundary geometries the exponents change by the effective dimension of the driving noise.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies exact spatio-temporal moduli of continuity for solutions to nonlinear parabolic SPDEs on a bounded interval under Dirichlet, Neumann, or Robin boundary conditions. The main results are: a Khinchine-type local law of the iterated logarithm (Theorem 1.1), an exact uniform modulus of continuity (Theorem 1.2), existence and density of exceptional increments (Corollary 1.4), small-ball probability estimates (Theorem 1.7), and a Chung-type LIL (Theorem 1.8). These results are extended to the open KPZ equation via the Hopf-Cole transform (Theorems 1.11 and 1.13). The proof strategy is: (i) establish strong local non-determinism and matching variance bounds for the linear stochastic heat equation, (ii) verify the Lee--Xiao framework for anisotropic Gaussian random fields, (iii) prove detailed linearization error estimates with exponent ζ>1, and (iv) transfer exact moduli from the Gaussian solution w to the nonlinear solution u. The paper is well structured and contains substantial new technical work, especially the SLND proof under Robin boundary conditions.

Significance. If the proofs are completed as claimed, this is a substantial advance: it gives the first exact spatio-temporal moduli of continuity for non-Gaussian parabolic SPDEs on bounded intervals and for the open KPZ equation, with constants that are universal up to the law of the driving noise. The paper is notable for being parameter-free: no fitted constants or circular definitions appear, and the Gaussian component is imported from an external general framework (Lee--Xiao) whose hypotheses are verified rather than modified. The new SLND result for Robin boundary conditions, obtained through the eigenfunction basis rather than Fourier transform, is an original contribution that may be useful beyond this paper. The linearization-error estimates, with explicit exponents giving ζ>1, are the key technical engine and appear sound in the interior case. The main obstruction is a proof gap in the full-domain version of the linearization-error almost-sure bound, which affects some boundary and near-t=0 statements as written.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Proposition 4.10] Proposition 4.10 is stated for the full rectangle [0,T]×[0,L], but its proof invokes Proposition 4.9 with I=[0,T]×[0,L]. Proposition 4.9 is explicitly proved only for I=[a,T]×[0,L] with a>0, or for I=[0,T]×[c,d] under assumption (1.6). The truncation argument for general b,σ does not introduce (1.6), so the Borel–Cantelli step is not justified near t=0 or at the spatial boundary. This is load-bearing because Proposition 4.10 is the vehicle used to make the linearization error negligible at the exact logarithmic rates. The interior results (t0>0, x0∈(0,L)) can be recovered by localizing to a subrectangle [a,T]×[c,d] where Proposition 4.9 applies, but the stated full-domain proposition and the a=0 extensions are not proved as written. The authors should either prove the full-domain statement with a genuinely new argument, or restate and use a local version that is actually covered by Propo
  2. [§5.1, Theorem 1.1 (t0=0 case)] The proof of Theorem 1.1 for t0=0 says that Proposition 4.10 and Theorem 3.14 'continue to hold when t0=0' under assumption (1.4). However, the only route to Proposition 4.9 on a rectangle touching t=0 requires assumption (1.6) globally on [0,T]×[c,d], whereas (1.4) is a local one-point condition near (0,x0). It is not shown that (1.4) implies the global condition needed for the error estimate. This is a mismatch between hypothesis and proof. A local version of the error estimate should be stated and proved, or assumption (1.6) should be imposed. The same issue affects the t0=0 statements of Theorems 1.7 and 1.8, where the displayed tail estimate for E(z0;z) relies on Proposition 4.9 in a form not justified under (1.10).
  3. [§5.2, Theorem 1.2 (a=0 case)] The uniform-modulus theorem for a=0 requires the full-domain linearization error to be o(ρ sqrt(log(1/ρ))) on [0,T]×[c,d]. The proof invokes Proposition 4.10, which has the gap described above. The additional assumption (1.6) does supply the hypothesis needed by Proposition 4.9 on I=[0,T]×[c,d], so the a=0 case may be fixable by a direct appeal to Proposition 4.9 rather than Proposition 4.10. As written, however, Proposition 4.10 overclaims, and the proof of Theorem 1.2 does not clearly isolate the range of ε and the rectangle where the error estimate is valid. The authors should make the local/global distinction explicit and ensure the cited proposition exactly matches the domain on which it is applied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§5.3, Corollary 1.4 proof] The proof refers to 'Theorem 1.3' when showing that the fixed-point limsup with denominator ρ sqrt(log(1/ρ)) is zero a.s. There is no Theorem 1.3; the intended reference is almost certainly Theorem 1.1 combined with the observation that sqrt(log log(1/ρ))/sqrt(log(1/ρ))→0. Please correct the reference.
  2. [§4.1, Lemma 4.7] The symbol c is overloaded: it is used both for the spatial lower bound in intervals like [0,T]×[c,d] and for the localization parameter in the proof. This makes the proof harder to follow. Rename one of them.
  3. [§4.1, Lemma 4.6] The statement says 'for any 0<a<T' but the case I=[0,T]×[c,d] under (1.6) is also included. The phrase 'This remains valid when I=[0,T]×[c,d]...' is clear, but it would be useful to state explicitly that the bound is uniform in t∈[a,T] in the first case and t∈[0,T] in the second. Currently the parameter a in the first case is not used in the local estimates except through Lemma 2.3.
  4. [§3.4, Theorem 3.14 proof] In the K0>0 part, the argument considers {w(t,x0)} and applies a one-dimensional LIL. It would be helpful to state explicitly that the constant K0 in (3.20) is bounded below by the one-dimensional constant, since the sup over the full parabolic ball dominates the temporal sup. This is implicit but should be spelled out.
  5. [§4.2, Proposition 4.9 proof] The proof writes 'Let A denote the event appearing on the left-hand side of (4.11)' and then defines B0. In the displayed bound for P{B0}, the exponent of δ in #J is fine, but the notation for the exponential term would be clearer if the same h were used consistently with the statement of the proposition. Currently the reader must reconcile h and δ.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity found; the derivation is self-contained, with the only overlapping citation (Lee–Xiao [53]) serving as independent external support.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is: prove SLND and variance bounds for the linear Gaussian field w; invoke the general anisotropic Gaussian random-field theorems of Lee–Xiao [53] to get exact Gaussian moduli and small-ball estimates; then show the nonlinear linearization error E(z;z') is negligible at the required rate using moment estimates and Borel–Cantelli (Propositions 4.1–4.10); finally transfer the Gaussian moduli to u and h via (5.1) and the Hopf–Cole logarithm. None of these steps defines a quantity in terms of the target result. The constants K0 and K are inherited from the Gaussian theorems, not fitted, and no parameter is estimated from the nonlinear solution. The only overlapping citation, [53], is a parameter-free general framework for anisotropic Gaussian random fields; the paper verifies its assumptions (SLND, Lemma 3.13, variance bounds) rather than importing the conclusion. This is independent support, so it does not constitute circularity. The apparent proof gap in Proposition 4.10 concerning the full rectangle [0,T]×[0,L] is a correctness/domain issue, not a circularity: even if the proof as written overclaims, the deduction is not circular. Overall, no fitted-input prediction, no self-definitional equation, and no load-bearing self-citation chain appear.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters fitted to data; the constants K0, K, and C2 are proved to exist and be finite and nonzero rather than chosen by hand. The paper introduces no new particles, fields, or unobserved entities. The axioms above are the standard analytic facts and explicit hypotheses used in the proofs.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Existence, uniqueness, and the orthonormal eigenfunction expansion for the heat kernel under (D), (N), (R), including lambda_n ~ n^2 and uniform eigenfunction bounds (2.6)-(2.9).
    Used throughout Sections 2-4 as the basis of Parseval identities, variance bounds, and SLND proofs.
  • domain assumption Gaussian upper bounds for the heat kernel under (D), (N), (R) as in Lemma 2.2, cited from [27], [9], and [20].
    These bounds drive the localization estimates in Lemmas 4.6 and 4.7; the paper says the method does not rely on Gaussian bounds except through this lemma.
  • domain assumption Strict positivity of the solution to the stochastic heat equation with multiplicative noise under Neumann/Robin boundary conditions, cited from [20, Proposition 2.7].
    Without positivity, the Hopf-Cole logarithm in (1.14) and the polarity statement for sigma(u)=u fail.
  • standard math The general Gaussian-field theorems of Lee and Xiao [53] (Theorems 5.2, 6.1, 4.4, Lemma 3.1) for exact moduli, Chung LIL, and small-ball constants under their Assumption 2.1.
    These black boxes convert SLND and the series representation into the Gaussian-case results in Theorems 3.14 and 3.15.
  • domain assumption Polarity of sigma^{-1}{0} for the solution u, assumed in Theorem 1.2 and Corollary 1.4.
    Ensures inf over compact I of |sigma(u(z))| is a.s. positive, so the denominator in (1.5) is meaningful; for general Lipschitz sigma this is a nontrivial hypothesis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the spatio-temporal increments of nonlinear parabolic SPDEs and the open KPZ equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3BHSV4B6

@misc{pith2026250805032,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the spatio-temporal increments of nonlinear parabolic SPDEs and the open KPZ equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3BHSV4B6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05032}
}
read the original abstract

We study spatio-temporal increments of the solutions to nonlinear parabolic SPDEs on a bounded interval with Dirichlet, Neumann, or Robin boundary conditions. We identify the exact local and uniform spatio-temporal moduli of continuity for the sample functions of the solutions. These moduli of continuity results imply the existence of random points in space-time at which spatio-temporal oscillations are exceptionally large. We also establish small-ball probability estimates and Chung-type laws of the iterated logarithm for spatio-temporal increments. Our method yields extension of some of these results to the open KPZ equation on the unit interval with inhomogeneous Neumann boundary conditions. Our key ingredients include new strong local non-determinism results for linear stochastic heat equation under various types of boundary conditions, and detailed estimates for the errors in linearization of spatio-temporal increments of the solution to the nonlinear equation.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Adler and Jonathan E

    Robert J. Adler and Jonathan E. Taylor, Random fields and geometry , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2007. MR 2319516

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    T. W. Anderson, The integral of a symmetric unimodal function over a symmetric convex set and some probability inequalities , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 6 (1955), 170–176. MR 69229

    1955

  3. [3]

    Siva Athreya, Mathew Joseph, and Carl Mueller, Small ball probabilities and a support theo- rem for the stochastic heat equation, Ann. Probab. 49 (2021), no. 5, 2548–2572. MR 4317712

    2021

  4. [4]

    Fabrice Baudoin, Li Chen, Che-Hung Huang, Cheng Ouyang, Samy Tindel, and Jing Wang, Parabolic anderson model in bounded domains of recurrent metric measure spaces , arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.01797 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Berman, Local nondeterminism and local times of Gaussian processes , Indiana Univ

    Simeon M. Berman, Local nondeterminism and local times of Gaussian processes , Indiana Univ. Math. J. 23 (1973/74), 69–94. MR 317397

    1973

  6. [6]

    Lorenzo Bertini and Nicoletta Cancrini, The stochastic heat equation: Feynman-Kac formula and intermittence, J. Statist. Phys. 78 (1995), no. 5-6, 1377–1401. MR 1316109

    1995

  7. [7]

    Christer Borell, The Brunn-Minkowski inequality in Gauss space , Invent. Math. 30 (1975), no. 2, 207–216. MR 399402

    1975

  8. [8]

    Theory Related Fields 185 (2023), no

    W lodek Bryc, Alexey Kuznetsov, Yizao Wang, and Jacek Weso lowski, Markov processes related to the stationary measure for the open KPZ equation , Probab. Theory Related Fields 185 (2023), no. 1-2, 353–389. MR 4528972

    2023

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Partial Differ

    David Candil, Le Chen, and Cheuk Yin Lee, Parabolic stochastic PDEs on bounded domains with rough initial conditions: moment and correlation bounds , Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 12 (2024), no. 3, 1507–1573. MR 4781791

    2024

  2. [10]

    Ren´ e Carmona and David Nualart, Random nonlinear wave equations: propagation of sin- gularities, Ann. Probab. 16 (1988), no. 2, 730–751. MR 929075

    1988

  3. [11]

    Carmona and S

    Ren´ e A. Carmona and S. A. Molchanov, Parabolic Anderson problem and intermittency , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1994), no. 518, viii+125. MR 1185878

    1994

  4. [12]

    Theory Related Fields 133 (2005), no

    Sandra Cerrai, Stabilization by noise for a class of stochastic reaction-diffusion equations , Probab. Theory Related Fields 133 (2005), no. 2, 190–214. MR 2198698

    2005

  5. [13]

    Jiaming Chen, Chung’s law of the iterated logarithm for a class of stochastic heat equations , Electron. Commun. Probab. 28 (2023), Paper No. 35, 7. MR 4651160

    2023

  6. [14]

    , Small ball probabilities for the stochastic heat equation with colored noise , Stochastic Process. Appl. 177 (2024), Paper No. 104455, 22. MR 4782455

    2024

  7. [15]

    , Small ball probabilities for the fractional stochastic heat equation driven by a colored noise, Electron. J. Probab. 30 (2025), Paper No. 35, 31. MR 4870299

    2025

  8. [16]

    Kai Lai Chung, On the maximum partial sums of sequences of independent random variables , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 64 (1948), 205–233. MR 26274

    1948

  9. [17]

    1 (2012), no

    Ivan Corwin, The Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation and universality class , Random Matrices Theory Appl. 1 (2012), no. 1, 1130001, 76. MR 2930377

    2012

  10. [18]

    Theory Adv

    , Some recent progress on the stationary measure for the open KPZ equation, Toeplitz operators and random matrices—in memory of Harold Widom, Oper. Theory Adv. Appl., vol. 289, Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, [2022]©2022, pp. 321–360. MR 4573955

    2022

  11. [19]

    Pure Appl

    Ivan Corwin and Alisa Knizel, Stationary measure for the open KPZ equation , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 77 (2024), no. 4, 2183–2267. MR 4705293

    2024

  12. [20]

    Pure Appl

    Ivan Corwin and Hao Shen, Open ASEP in the weakly asymmetric regime , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 71 (2018), no. 10, 2065–2128. MR 3861074

    2018

  13. [21]

    DuPreez, Joint continuity of Gaussian local times, Ann

    Jack Cuzick and Johannes P. DuPreez, Joint continuity of Gaussian local times, Ann. Probab. 10 (1982), no. 3, 810–817. MR 659550

    1982

  14. [22]

    152, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014

    Giuseppe Da Prato and Jerzy Zabczyk, Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions , second ed., Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications, vol. 152, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014. MR 3236753

    2014

  15. [23]

    Dalang, Davar Khoshnevisan, and Eulalia Nualart, Hitting probabilities for systems of non-linear stochastic heat equations with additive noise , ALEA Lat

    Robert C. Dalang, Davar Khoshnevisan, and Eulalia Nualart, Hitting probabilities for systems of non-linear stochastic heat equations with additive noise , ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat. 3 (2007), 231–271. MR 2365643

    2007

  16. [24]

    Dalang, Cheuk Yin Lee, Carl Mueller, and Yimin Xiao, Multiple points of Gaussian random fields, Electron

    Robert C. Dalang, Cheuk Yin Lee, Carl Mueller, and Yimin Xiao, Multiple points of Gaussian random fields, Electron. J. Probab. 26 (2021), Paper No. 17, 25. MR 4235468

    2021

  17. [25]

    Robert C Dalang and Marta Sanz-Sol´ e, Stochastic partial differential equations, space-time white noise and random fields , arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02119 (2024). 42 J. HU AND C.Y. LEE

    2024

  18. [26]

    Sayan Das, Temporal increments of the KPZ equation with general initial data , Electron. J. Probab. 29 (2024), Paper No. 190, 28. MR 4841676

    2024

  19. [27]

    E. B. Davies, Heat kernels and spectral theory , Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 92, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989. MR 990239

    1989

  20. [28]

    Donati-Martin and ´E

    C. Donati-Martin and ´E. Pardoux, White noise driven SPDEs with reflection, Probab. Theory Related Fields 95 (1993), no. 1, 1–24. MR 1207304

    1993

  21. [29]

    R. M. Dudley, The sizes of compact subsets of Hilbert space and continuity of Gaussian processes, J. Functional Analysis 1 (1967), 290–330. MR 220340

    1967

  22. [30]

    Fife, Mathematical aspects of reacting and diffusing systems , Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol

    Paul C. Fife, Mathematical aspects of reacting and diffusing systems , Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, vol. 28, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1979. MR 527914

    1979

  23. [31]

    Partial Differ

    Mohammud Foondun, Davar Khoshnevisan, and Pejman Mahboubi, Analysis of the gradient of the solution to a stochastic heat equation via fractional Brownian motion , Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. 3 (2015), no. 2, 133–158. MR 3350450

    2015

  24. [32]

    Mohammud Foondun and Erkan Nane, Asymptotic properties of some space-time fractional stochastic equations, Math. Z. 287 (2017), no. 1-2, 493–519. MR 3694685

    2017

  25. [33]

    Theory Related Fields 173 (2019), no

    M´ at´ e Gerencs´ er and Martin Hairer,Singular SPDEs in domains with boundaries , Probab. Theory Related Fields 173 (2019), no. 3-4, 697–758. MR 3936145

    2019

  26. [34]

    Martin Hairer, Solving the KPZ equation , Ann. of Math. (2) 178 (2013), no. 2, 559–664. MR 3071506

    2013

  27. [35]

    Martin Hairer and ´Etienne Pardoux, A Wong-Zakai theorem for stochastic PDEs , J. Math. Soc. Japan 67 (2015), no. 4, 1551–1604. MR 3417505

    2015

  28. [36]

    Takeuchi, A KPZ cocktail—shaken, not stirred

    Timothy Halpin-Healy and Kazumasa A. Takeuchi, A KPZ cocktail—shaken, not stirred . . . toasting 30 years of kinetically roughened surfaces , J. Stat. Phys. 160 (2015), no. 4, 794–814. MR 3373641

    2015

  29. [37]

    fractals , Electron

    Ben Hambly and Weiye Yang, Existence and space-time regularity for stochastic heat equa- tions on p.c.f. fractals , Electron. J. Probab. 23 (2018), Paper No. 22, 30. MR 3771759

    2018

  30. [38]

    Randall Herrell, Renming Song, Dongsheng Wu, and Yimin Xiao, Sharp space-time regularity of the solution to stochastic heat equation driven by fractional-colored noise , Stoch. Anal. Appl. 38 (2020), no. 4, 747–768. MR 4112745

    2020

  31. [39]

    Jingyu Huang and Davar Khoshnevisan, On the multifractal local behavior of parabolic sto- chastic PDEs , Electron. Commun. Probab. 22 (2017), Paper No. 49, 11. MR 3710805

    2017

  32. [40]

    Mehran Kardar, Giorgio Parisi, and Yi-Cheng Zhang, Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces, Physical Review Letters 56 (1986), no. 9, 889

    1986

  33. [41]

    1962, Springer, Berlin, 2009, pp

    Davar Khoshnevisan, A primer on stochastic partial differential equations , A minicourse on stochastic partial differential equations, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1962, Springer, Berlin, 2009, pp. 1–38. MR 2508772

    1962

  34. [42]

    119, Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014

    , Analysis of stochastic partial differential equations , CBMS Regional Conference Se- ries in Mathematics, vol. 119, Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014. MR 3222416

    2014

  35. [43]

    Davar Khoshnevisan, Kunwoo Kim, and Carl Mueller, Small-ball constants, and exceptional flat points of SPDEs , Electron. J. Probab. 29 (2024), Paper No. 180, 31. MR 4838436

    2024

  36. [44]

    , An invariance principle for some reaction-diffusion equations with a multiplicative random source, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.11107 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Davar Khoshnevisan, Kunwoo Kim, Carl Mueller, and Shang-Yuan Shiu, Phase analysis for a family of stochastic reaction-diffusion equations, Electron. J. Probab. 28 (2023), Paper No. 101, 66. MR 4620551

    2023

  38. [46]

    Davar Khoshnevisan, Yuval Peres, and Yimin Xiao, Limsup random fractals , Electron. J. Probab. 5 (2000), no. 5, 24. MR 1743726

    2000

  39. [47]

    1729, Springer, Berlin, 2000, pp

    Davar Khoshnevisan and Zhan Shi, Fast sets and points for fractional Brownian motion , S´ eminaire de Probabilit´ es, XXXIV, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1729, Springer, Berlin, 2000, pp. 393–416. MR 1768077

    2000

  40. [48]

    Davar Khoshnevisan, Jason Swanson, Yimin Xiao, and Liang Zhang, Weak existence of a solution to a differential equation driven by a very rough fbm , arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.3613 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  41. [49]

    SPATIO-TEMPORAL INCREMENTS OF NONLINEAR PARABOLIC SPDES 43

    Alisa Knizel and Konstantin Matetski, The strong feller property of the open kpz equation , arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.04466 (2022). SPATIO-TEMPORAL INCREMENTS OF NONLINEAR PARABOLIC SPDES 43

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Fourier Anal

    Cheuk Yin Lee, Local nondeterminism and local times of the stochastic wave equation driven by fractional-colored noise , J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 28 (2022), no. 2, Paper No. 26, 38. MR 4397191

    2022

  43. [51]

    Cheuk Yin Lee and Yimin Xiao, Local nondeterminism and the exact modulus of continu- ity for stochastic wave equation , Electron. Commun. Probab. 24 (2019), Paper No. 52, 8. MR 4003126

    2019

  44. [52]

    , Propagation of singularities for the stochastic wave equation , Stochastic Process. Appl. 143 (2022), 31–54. MR 4332774

    2022

  45. [53]

    1, 523–550

    , Chung-type law of the iterated logarithm and exact moduli of continuity for a class of anisotropic Gaussian random fields , Bernoulli 29 (2023), no. 1, 523–550. MR 4497257

    2023

  46. [54]

    , Local times of anisotropic gaussian random fields and stochastic heat equation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.13732 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Pedro Lei and David Nualart, A decomposition of the bifractional Brownian motion and some applications, Statist. Probab. Lett. 79 (2009), no. 5, 619–624. MR 2499385

    2009

  48. [56]

    W. V. Li and Q.-M. Shao, Gaussian processes: inequalities, small ball probabilities and applications, Stochastic processes: theory and methods, Handbook of Statist., vol. 19, North- Holland, Amsterdam, 2001, pp. 533–597. MR 1861734

    2001

  49. [57]

    Marcus and Jay Rosen, Markov processes, Gaussian processes, and local times , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol

    Michael B. Marcus and Jay Rosen, Markov processes, Gaussian processes, and local times , Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 100, Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2006. MR 2250510

    2006

  50. [58]

    MR 1742312

    William McLean, Strongly elliptic systems and boundary integral equations , Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, 2000. MR 1742312

    2000

  51. [59]

    Meerschaert, Wensheng Wang, and Yimin Xiao, Fernique-type inequalities and moduli of continuity for anisotropic Gaussian random fields , Trans

    Mark M. Meerschaert, Wensheng Wang, and Yimin Xiao, Fernique-type inequalities and moduli of continuity for anisotropic Gaussian random fields , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 365 (2013), no. 2, 1081–1107. MR 2995384

    2013

  52. [60]

    Pitt, Local nondeterminism and Hausdorff dimension , Seminar on stochastic processes, 1986 (Charlottesville, Va., 1986), Progr

    Ditlev Monrad and Loren D. Pitt, Local nondeterminism and Hausdorff dimension , Seminar on stochastic processes, 1986 (Charlottesville, Va., 1986), Progr. Probab. Statist., vol. 13, Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1987, pp. 163–189. MR 902433

    1986

  53. [61]

    Mueller and R

    C. Mueller and R. Tribe, Hitting properties of a random string, Electron. J. Probab. 7 (2002), no. 10, 29. MR 1902843

    2002

  54. [62]

    37 (1991), no

    Carl Mueller, On the support of solutions to the heat equation with noise, Stochastics Stochas- tics Rep. 37 (1991), no. 4, 225–245. MR 1149348

    1991

  55. [63]

    Eulalia Nualart, Moment bounds for some fractional stochastic heat equations on the ball , Electron. Commun. Probab. 23 (2018), Paper No. 41, 12. MR 3841402

    2018

  56. [64]

    James Taylor, How often on a Brownian path does the law of iterated logarithm fail?, Proc

    Steven Orey and S. James Taylor, How often on a Brownian path does the law of iterated logarithm fail?, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 28 (1974), 174–192. MR 359031

    1974

  57. [65]

    Pitt, Local times for Gaussian vector fields , Indiana Univ

    Loren D. Pitt, Local times for Gaussian vector fields , Indiana Univ. Math. J. 27 (1978), no. 2, 309–330. MR 471055

    1978

  58. [66]

    Press, Somerville, MA, 2012, pp

    Jeremy Quastel, Introduction to KPZ, Current developments in mathematics, 2011, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2012, pp. 125–194. MR 3098078

    2011

  59. [67]

    Michel Talagrand, Hausdorff measure of trajectories of multiparameter fractional Brownian motion, Ann. Probab. 23 (1995), no. 2, 767–775. MR 1334170

    1995

  60. [68]

    140, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012

    Gerald Teschl, Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 140, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012. MR 2961944

    2012

  61. [69]

    Walsh, Propagation of singularities in the Brownian sheet , Ann

    John B. Walsh, Propagation of singularities in the Brownian sheet , Ann. Probab. 10 (1982), no. 2, 279–288. MR 647504

    1982

  62. [70]

    1180, Springer, Berlin, 1986, pp

    , An introduction to stochastic partial differential equations , ´Ecole d’´ et´ e de proba- bilit´ es de Saint-Flour, XIV—1984, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1180, Springer, Berlin, 1986, pp. 265–439. MR 876085

    1984

  63. [71]

    Ran Wang and Yimin Xiao, Temporal properties of the stochastic fractional heat equation with spatially-colored noise, Theory Probab. Math. Statist. (2024), no. 110, 121–142. MR 4751813

    2024

  64. [72]

    Yimin Xiao, Strong local nondeterminism and sample path properties of Gaussian random fields, Asymptotic theory in probability and statistics with applications, Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM), vol. 2, Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2008, pp. 136–176. MR 2466984

    2008

  65. [73]

    Theory Related Fields 183 (2022), no

    Kevin Yang, KPZ equation from non-simple variations on open ASEP , Probab. Theory Related Fields 183 (2022), no. 1-2, 415–545. MR 4421178 44 J. HU AND C.Y. LEE School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China Email addre...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.