Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

XRISM/Resolve View of Abell 2319: Turbulence, Sloshing, and ICM Dynamics

T0 review · 4 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The core of Abell 2319 is sloshing: low-entropy gas moves at its own speed, and one patch shows a 400 km/s velocity spread.

desk verdict The abstract reads like a plausible XRISM result, but the full text is an unrelated image-colorization paper, so the analysis—and the claim—currently do not exist in the submitted artifact. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05067 v3 pith:BNAGI7MM submitted 2025-08-07 astro-ph.HE

XRISM Collaboration , Marc Audard , Hisamitsu Awaki , Ralf Ballhausen , Aya Bamba , Ehud Behar , Rozenn Boissay-malaquin , Laura Brenneman
show 127 more authors
Gregory V. Brown Lia Corrales Elisa Costantini Renata Cumbee Maria Diaz Trigo Chris Done Tadayasu Dotani Ken Ebisawa Megan E. Eckart Dominique Eckert Satoshi Eguchi Teruaki Enoto Yuichiro Ezoe Adam Foster Ryuichi Fujimoto Yutaka Fujita Yasushi Fukazawa Kotaro Fukushima Akihiro Furuzawa Luigi Gallo Javier García Liyi Gu Matteo Guainazzi Kouichi Hagino Kenji Hamaguchi Isamu Hatsukade Katsuhiro Hayashi Takayuki Hayashi Natalie Hell Edmund Hodges-kluck Ann Hornschemeier Yuto Ichinohe Daiki Ishi Manabu Ishida Kumi Ishikawa Yoshitaka Ishisaki Jelle Kaastra Timothy Kallman Erin Kara Satoru Katsuda Yoshiaki Kanemaru Richard Kelley Caroline Kilbourne Shunji Kitamoto Shogo B. Kobayashi Takayoshi Kohmura Aya Kubota Maurice Leutenegger Michael Loewenstein Yoshitomo Maeda Maxim Markevitch Hironori Matsumoto Kyoko Matsushita Dan Mccammon Brian Mcnamara Francois Mernier Eric Miller Jon Miller Ikuyuki Mitsuishi Misaki Mizumoto Tsunefumi Mizuno Koji Mori Koji Mukai Hiroshi Murakami Richard Mushotzky Hiroshi Nakajima Kazuhiro Nakazawa Jan-uwe Ness Kumiko Nobukawa Masayoshi Nobukawa Hirofumi Noda Hirokazu Odaka Shoji Ogawa Anna Ogorzalek Takashi Okajima Naomi Ota Stephane Paltani Robert Petre Paul Plucinsky Frederick Porter Katja Pottschmidt Kosuke Sato Toshiki Sato Makoto Sawada Hiromi Seta Megumi Shidatsu Aurora Simionescu Randall Smith Hiromasa Suzuki Andrew Szymkowiak Hiromitsu Takahashi Mai Takeo Toru Tamagawa Keisuke Tamura Takaaki Tanaka Atsushi Tanimoto Makoto Tashiro Yukikatsu Terada Yuichi Terashima Yohko Tsuboi Masahiro Tsujimoto Hiroshi Tsunemi Takeshi Tsuru Hiroyuki Uchida Nagomi Uchida Yuusuke Uchida Hideki Uchiyama Yoshihiro Ueda Shinichiro Uno Jacco Vink Shin Watanabe Brian J. Williams Satoshi Yamada Shinya Yamada Hiroya Yamaguchi Kazutaka Yamaoka Noriko Yamasaki Makoto Yamauchi Shigeo Yamauchi Tahir Yaqoob Tomokage Yoneyama Tessei Yoshida Mihoko Yukita Irina Zhuravleva Riccardo Seppi Itsuki Aihara Yuki Omiya
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords galaxyclustersintraclustermediumX-rayspectroscopyXRISM/Resolvesloshingturbulencecoldfrontspecificentropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports spatially resolved X-ray spectroscopy of the core of the galaxy cluster Abell 2319. It finds that the bulk gas near the brightest cluster galaxy moves with it to within 40 km s$^{-1}$, but that this quiet average hides local motion: a blueshift of up to $\sim$230 km s$^{-1}$ at the eastern edge of a cold front, where the gas has the lowest specific entropy, and a velocity dispersion of $\sim$400 km s$^{-1}$ just south of that front. The authors interpret this pattern as sloshing of the gas in the cluster's gravitational potential, viewed at an inclination, with different entropy phases moving at their own velocities, and the 400 km s$^{-1}$ spread as the development of turbulence. The result matters because it shows how X-ray spectra can directly expose the mixing and non-thermal motions that shape cluster cores.

What carries the argument

The central tool is emission-line spectroscopy of the hot intracluster medium: the Doppler shift of the line centroid gives the line-of-sight gas velocity, and the line width beyond the instrumental response gives the velocity dispersion. The interpretation is organized by specific entropy: the cold front separates low-entropy gas that has been lifted out by sloshing from the hotter, higher-entropy surroundings, so the spatial pattern of velocity offsets and dispersions relative to the BCG's rest frame is read as a map of the sloshing flow.

What would settle it

Fit the same spatial bin with a two-temperature model and an independently calibrated line-spread function; if the intrinsic line width drops below about 250 km s$^{-1}$, the turbulence interpretation is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using XRISM/Resolve's high-resolution spectra, the authors map line-of-sight gas velocity and velocity dispersion in a 3 arcmin $\times$ 4 arcmin region around the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) of Abell 2319. The average velocity agrees with the BCG to within 40 km s$^{-1}$, and the average dispersion is only 230--250 km s$^{-1}$, yet the core is not quiescent: the coldest, lowest-entropy gas at the east edge of the cold front is blueshifted by up to $\sim$230 km s$^{-1}$, and a region further south shows a velocity dispersion of $\sim$400 km s$^{-1}$ while its mean velocity stays close to the BCG. The paper takes this combination—little bulk offset but locally enhanced line broadening, con

Load-bearing premise

The reading of a 400 km s$^{-1}$ velocity spread as turbulence rests on assuming the X-ray spectrum in each region is a single-temperature plasma, so any broadening beyond the instrument's line profile is caused by gas motion rather than by hidden temperature structure or small calibration errors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the sloshing interpretation is right, most of the core's kinetic energy is in a large-scale, inclined flow rather than in direct merger-driven bulk motion, so the cluster's dynamical state must be modeled with sloshing, not a simple spherical collapse.
  • The 400 km s$^{-1}$ dispersion implies turbulence is being generated behind the cold front; quantifying its dissipation will matter for how heat and metals are mixed in the intracluster medium.
  • Because different entropy phases have different velocities, single-phase measurements will understate the complexity; future work must fit multi-phase emission to avoid misreading dispersion as temperature structure.
  • The lack of a high-redshift component from subcluster Abell 2319B in the covered region suggests that subcluster gas has not yet mixed into the core on the observed scales, constraining the merger geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's own numbers imply a modest turbulent Mach number of roughly 0.2--0.3 for an 8 keV plasma at 400 km s$^{-1}$; if confirmed, the associated non-thermal pressure support would be only a few percent, but enough to bias hydrostatic mass estimates unless modeled.
  • A testable extension: sloshing with an inclined viewing angle predicts a systematic velocity-shear pattern—oppositely signed velocities on either side of the cold front—that deeper, wider XRISM mappings could confirm or rule out.
  • The single-temperature modeling assumption could be checked with the same data by comparing line widths of iron line complexes with different temperature sensitivities; an alternative extension is to fit a two-temperature model and see whether the 400 km s$^{-1}$ width collapses.
  • If the 400 km s$^{-1}$ dispersion is real turbulence, it places a constraint on the effective viscosity of the intracluster medium; if it is an artifact of multi-temperature structure, it still tells us about entropy mixing, just not about motion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript (arXiv:2508.05067) presents an abstract claiming XRISM/Resolve observations of the galaxy cluster Abell 2319. The abstract reports a core temperature of ~8 keV, a northwest hot region at ~11 keV, an average gas velocity consistent with the brightest cluster galaxy to within 40 km/s, a modest average velocity dispersion of 230-250 km/s, a localized blueshift of ~230 km/s near the cold front, and an enhanced dispersion of 400 km/s interpreted as turbulence. These findings are interpreted as evidence of sloshing motion with an inclination angle and phase-dependent velocities, consistent with simulations. However, the full text supplied for review is not this astrophysics paper: it is an unrelated computer-vision manuscript on automatic image colorization. None of the spectral data, spatial binning, spectral modeling, line-spread-function calibration, systematic-error budget, maps, or simulation comparisons that would support the abstract's claims are present in the submitted document.

Significance. If substantiated, the claimed XRISM/Resolve measurements would be valuable for understanding cold-front dynamics, turbulent velocity dispersion, and entropy-dependent sloshing in a hot, merging cluster. The central claims are falsifiable and would constrain models of ICM turbulence and mixing. However, the significance cannot be assessed from the submitted material because the methods and data are entirely absent. The paper as submitted contains no reproducible analyses, no machine-checked derivations, and no quantitative comparisons that could be independently evaluated. Every headline number in the abstract is therefore unverified, and the scientific argument reduces to an unsupported set of assertions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (all)] The submitted full text is an unrelated computer-vision paper on image colorization, not an XRISM analysis of Abell 2319. This is not a cosmetic defect: the entire chain from detector counts to the reported 230-250 km/s and 400 km/s velocity dispersions is absent. There are no spectra, no spectral models, no spatial or spectral binning definitions, and no line-spread-function treatment. The central claim of the abstract is therefore unsupported by any evidence in the manuscript. This is a load-bearing issue that prevents evaluation of the paper's soundness.
  2. [Abstract, velocity dispersion claims] The abstract reports a velocity dispersion of 400 km/s in one region and 230-250 km/s average dispersion without presenting the underlying spectral fits. The reader's concern that the inferred dispersion depends on the single-temperature assumption and on the XRISM line-spread-function calibration is exactly the key modeling uncertainty. Because no spectra or model residuals are shown, there is no way to determine whether the 400 km/s value is real turbulence, unresolved multi-temperature structure, or a calibration artifact. This must be addressed with the actual data and systematic-error budget before the claim can be considered.
  3. [Abstract, sloshing interpretation] The interpretation that different specific-entropy phases participate in sloshing with their own velocities is stated as 'expected from simulations,' but the manuscript contains no comparison to any specific simulation, no mock-observation analysis, and no description of how the projected line-of-sight velocities map to the proposed three-dimensional sloshing geometry. Without those steps, the inference from a spatial velocity map to a sloshing geometry with inclination angle is not established.
  4. [Abstract, numerical claims] Key quantities are quoted without uncertainties: the 40 km/s agreement with the BCG, the 230-250 km/s average dispersion, the 230 km/s blueshift, and the 400 km/s turbulent dispersion. In high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy, these values are only meaningful with statistical and systematic error bars. The absence of uncertainties and the absence of the methods to compute them make the reported values unquantified and unverifiable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Full text header] The arXiv identifier and subject class shown in the full text, arXiv:2508.05067v2 [cs.CV], do not match the astro-ph.HE topic of the abstract. The manuscript should be re-submitted with the correct PDF.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a statement of the observation exposure time, the spatial resolution of the resolved spectroscopy, and the definition of 'average' versus 'spatially-resolved' velocity measurements.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity detected; the supplied full text is an unrelated colorization paper, so the central claim is unverifiable, but missing methods is not circular reasoning.

full rationale

The abstract reports measured XRISM/Resolve line-of-sight velocities and velocity dispersions in Abell 2319, then interprets spatial variations as sloshing and turbulence compared with external simulations. The measured quantities are not defined in terms of the sloshing model, and no equation in the supplied material fits the model to the data or derives the conclusion from its own assumptions. The full text supplied is an unrelated computer-vision paper on automatic image colorization, so none of the spectral modeling, line-spread-function calibration, spatial binning, or systematic-error analysis is present. This is a severe missing-support and verifiability problem, which I flag explicitly, but it is not circularity: no specific reduction of the claimed prediction to its inputs can be exhibited. The phrase 'as expected from simulations' invokes external simulations rather than a self-citation chain, and no parameter fitted to the sloshing interpretation is renamed as a prediction. Therefore no circular step is identifiable, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are identifiable from the abstract alone. The spectral fit parameters (temperature, velocity shift, line broadening) are the measured quantities of interest, not ad hoc adjustments. The full text needed to identify any nuisance parameters is unavailable. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The intracluster medium is in collisional ionization equilibrium and is optically thin, so line centroids and widths directly reflect gas velocity and temperature.
    Standard assumption for X-ray spectroscopy of hot cluster gas; invoked implicitly by all volume emission measure analyses and necessary to convert Resolve spectra into velocity measurements.
  • domain assumption Excess line broadening beyond thermal broadening corresponds to turbulent velocity dispersion.
    The interpretation of the 400 km/s dispersion as turbulence requires that unresolved multi-temperature structure or calibration artifacts are not the cause; no evidence for this is presented in the abstract.
  • domain assumption Simulations of cluster sloshing provide a valid template for interpreting the observed kinematics.
    The abstract concludes the data are 'as expected from simulations'; this assumes the simulated sloshing models are sufficiently realistic to make that comparison meaningful.
  • domain assumption XRISM/Resolve's line-spread function and energy scale are calibrated to support velocity measurements with uncertainties of at most tens of km/s.
    The reported velocity consistency 'to within 40 km/s' and dispersions of 230-400 km/s are small relative to the spectral resolution; accurate calibration is essential. Not stated in the abstract but required.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of XRISM/Resolve View of Abell 2319: Turbulence, Sloshing, and ICM Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BNAGI7MM

@misc{pith2026250805067,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: XRISM/Resolve View of Abell 2319: Turbulence, Sloshing, and ICM Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BNAGI7MM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05067}
}
abstract

We present results from XRISM/Resolve observations of the core of the galaxy cluster Abell 2319, focusing on its kinematic properties. The intracluster medium (ICM) exhibits temperatures of approximately 8 keV across the core, with a prominent cold front and a high-temperature region ($\sim$11 keV) in the northwest. The average gas velocity in the 3 arcmin $\times$ 4 arcmin region around the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) covered by two Resolve pointings is consistent with that of the BCG to within 40 km s$^{-1}$ and we found modest average velocity dispersion of 230-250 km s$^{-1}$. On the other hand, spatially-resolved spectroscopy reveals interesting variations. A blueshift of up to $\sim$230 km s$^{-1}$ is observed around the east edge of the cold front, where the gas with the lowest specific entropy is found. The region further south inside the cold front shows only a small velocity difference from the BCG; however, its velocity dispersion is enhanced to 400 km s$^{-1}$, implying the development of turbulence. These characteristics indicate that we are observing sloshing motion with some inclination angle following BCG and that gas phases with different specific entropy participate in sloshing with their own velocities, as expected from simulations. No significant evidence for a high-redshift ICM component associated with the subcluster Abell 2319B was found in the region covered by the current Resolve pointings. These results highlight the importance of sloshing and turbulence in shaping the internal structure of Abell 2319. Further deep observations are necessary to better understand the mixing and turbulent processes within the cluster.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. XRISM Reveals a Kinematically Coherent Core System of the Nearby Cool-Core Cluster Abell 2199

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    XRISM observations show the core of Abell 2199 is kinematically coherent with low turbulence, where turbulent heating may offset ~20% of radiative cooling losses.

  2. Radio Halos in Galaxy Clusters as unveiled by the SKA telescope

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    SKA-Low is forecast to detect ≳2500 radio halos (including ≳1000 ultra-steep-spectrum) up to z≈0.6, reaching clusters of ~10^14 M⊙ and z≈1.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    \@bibitem \@bib@author\@prev@author \@set@biblabel \@lbibitem[#1] \@bib@parse#1()\@nil \@set@biblabel \@bib@parse#1(#2)#3\@nil \@bib@author #1 @edef\@bib@year @space#2 \@empty \@set@biblabel#1 \@bib@author\@empty \@latex@warning Author name should be given for reference entry ``#1'' \@bib@year\@empty \@latex@warning Publication year should be given for re...

  2. [2]

    Arnaud , K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes , 17

    1996

  3. [3]

    & Markevitch , M

    Ascasibar , Y. & Markevitch , M. 2006, , 650, 102

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    2018, , 476, 5591

    Botteon , A., Gastaldello , F., & Brunetti , G. 2018, , 476, 5591

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    & Jones , T

    Brunetti , G. & Jones , T. W. 2014, International Journal of Modern Physics D, 23, 1430007

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    1979, , 228, 939

    Cash , W. 1979, , 228, 939

    1979

  7. [7]

    2022, , 509, 1201

    Chadayammuri , U., ZuHone , J., Nulsen , P., et al. 2022, , 509, 1201

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    2012, , 421, 1123

    Churazov , E., Vikhlinin , A., Zhuravleva , I., et al. 2012, , 421, 1123

    work page 2012

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    2025, manuscript submitted to JATIS

    Eckart . 2025, manuscript submitted to JATIS

    2025

  2. [10]

    2019, , 621, A40

    Eckert , D., Ghirardini , V., Ettori , S., et al. 2019, , 621, A40

    2019

  3. [11]

    2013, , 779, 189

    Farnsworth , D., Rudnick , L., Brown , S., & Brunetti , G. 2013, , 779, 189

    2013

  4. [12]

    1997, , 2, 501

    Feretti , L., Giovannini , G., & B \"o hringer , H. 1997, , 2, 501

    1997

  5. [13]

    2012, , 20, 54

    Feretti , L., Giovannini , G., Govoni , F., & Murgia , M. 2012, , 20, 54

    2012

  6. [14]

    2004, , 612, L9

    Fujita , Y., Matsumoto , T., & Wada , K. 2004, , 612, L9

    2004

  7. [15]

    2018, , 614, A7

    Ghirardini , V., Ettori , S., Eckert , D., et al. 2018, , 614, A7

    2018

  8. [16]

    A., Feretti , L., & Giovannini , G

    Govoni , F., En lin , T. A., Feretti , L., & Giovannini , G. 2001, , 369, 441

    2001

  9. [17]

    2004, , 605, 695

    Govoni , F., Markevitch , M., Vikhlinin , A., et al. 2004, , 605, 695

    2004

  10. [18]

    2024, , 528, 7274

    Heinrich , A., Zhuravleva , I., Zhang , C., et al. 2024, , 528, 7274

    2024

  11. [19]

    2016, , 535, 117

    Hitomi Collaboration , Aharonian , F., Akamatsu , H., et al. 2016, , 535, 117

    2016

  12. [20]

    2018, , 70, 9

    Hitomi Collaboration , Aharonian , F., Akamatsu , H., et al. 2018, , 70, 9

    2018

  13. [21]

    2019, , 622, A136

    Hurier , G., Adam , R., & Keshet , U. 2019, , 622, A136

    2019

  14. [22]

    Ichinohe , Y., Simionescu , A., Werner , N., Markevitch , M., & Wang , Q. H. S. 2021, , 504, 2800

    2021

  15. [23]

    Inogamov , N. A. & Sunyaev , R. A. 2003, Astronomy Letters, 29, 791

    2003

  16. [24]

    2025, manuscript submitted to JATIS

    Kelley . 2025, manuscript submitted to JATIS

    2025

  17. [25]

    & Bender , R

    Kluge , M. & Bender , R. 2023, , 267, 41

    2023

  18. [26]

    Kravtsov , A. V. & Borgani , S. 2012, , 50, 353

    2012

  19. [27]

    2025, manuscript submitted to JATIS

    Leutenegger . 2025, manuscript submitted to JATIS

    2025

  20. [28]

    R., & Zhuravleva , I

    Li , M., McNamara , B. R., & Zhuravleva , I. 2025, , 537, 2198

    2025

  21. [29]

    Lodders , K., Palme , H., & Gail , H. P. 2009, Landolt Börnstein, 4B, 712

    2009

  22. [30]

    1996, , 465, L1

    Markevitch , M. 1996, , 465, L1

    1996

  23. [31]

    & Vikhlinin , A

    Markevitch , M. & Vikhlinin , A. 2007, , 443, 1

    2007

  24. [32]

    Million , E. T. & Allen , S. W. 2009, , 399, 1307

    2009

  25. [33]

    & Sharma , P

    Mohapatra , R. & Sharma , P. 2019, , 484, 4881

    2019

  26. [34]

    1999, , 525, L73

    Molendi , S., De Grandi , S., Fusco-Femiano , R., et al. 1999, , 525, L73

    1999

  27. [35]

    R., Hill , J

    Oegerle , W. R., Hill , J. M., & Fitchett , M. J. 1995, , 110, 32

    1995

  28. [36]

    & Umetsu , K

    Okabe , N. & Umetsu , K. 2008, , 60, 345

    2008

  29. [37]

    2023, , 75, 37

    Omiya , Y., Nakazawa , K., Matsushita , K., et al. 2023, , 75, 37

    2023

  30. [38]

    2024, , 689, A173

    Omiya , Y., Nakazawa , K., Tamura , T., et al. 2024, , 689, A173

    2024

  31. [39]

    S., Randall , S

    Owers , M. S., Randall , S. W., Nulsen , P. E. J., et al. 2011, , 728, 27

    2011

  32. [40]

    2011, , 726, 17

    Paul , S., Iapichino , L., Miniati , F., Bagchi , J., & Mannheim , K. 2011, , 726, 17

    2011

  33. [41]

    Porter , F. S. 2025, manuscript submitted to JATIS

    2025

  34. [42]

    S., Chiao , M

    Porter , F. S., Chiao , M. P., Eckart , M. E., et al. 2016, Journal of Low Temperature Physics, 184, 498

    2016

  35. [43]

    Ricker , P. M. & Sarazin , C. L. 2001, , 561, 621

    2001

  36. [44]

    S., Dennerl , K., Russell , H

    Sanders , J. S., Dennerl , K., Russell , H. R., et al. 2020, , 633, A42

    2020

  37. [45]

    2025, manuscript submitted to JATIS

    Sawada . 2025, manuscript submitted to JATIS

    2025

  38. [46]

    2020, , 495, 784

    Shi , X., Nagai , D., Aung , H., & Wetzel , A. 2020, , 495, 784

    2020

  39. [47]

    K., Brickhouse , N

    Smith , R. K., Brickhouse , N. S., Liedahl , D. A., & Raymond , J. C. 2001, , 556, L91

    2001

  40. [48]

    E., & Rudnick , L

    Storm , E., Jeltema , T. E., & Rudnick , L. 2015, , 448, 2495

    2015

  41. [49]

    2009, , 61, 1293

    Sugawara , C., Takizawa , M., & Nakazawa , K. 2009, , 61, 1293

    2009

  42. [50]

    2020, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tashiro , M., Maejima , H., Toda , K., et al. 2020, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 11444, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder , S. Nikzad , & K. Nakazawa , 1144422

    2020

  43. [51]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.20180

    Uchida , H., Mori , K., Tomida , H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.20180

    2025 arXiv

  44. [52]

    & Ichinohe , Y

    Ueda , S. & Ichinohe , Y. 2024, , 973, 98

    2024

  45. [53]

    J., de Gasperin , F., Akamatsu , H., et al

    van Weeren , R. J., de Gasperin , F., Akamatsu , H., et al. 2019, , 215, 16

    2019

  46. [54]

    Voit , G. M. 2005, Reviews of Modern Physics, 77, 207

    2005

  47. [55]

    A., Sanders , J

    Walker , S. A., Sanders , J. S., & Fabian , A. C. 2016, , 461, 684

    2016

  48. [56]

    Wang, Q. H. S. 2019, Phd thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD

    2019

  49. [57]

    Willingale , R., Starling , R. L. C., Beardmore , A. P., Tanvir , N. R., & O'Brien , P. T. 2013, , 431, 394

    2013

  50. [58]

    2025 a , , 982, L5

    XRISM Collaboration , Audard , M., Awaki , H., et al. 2025 a , , 982, L5

    2025

  51. [59]

    2025 b , , 985, L20

    XRISM Collaboration , Audard , M., Awaki , H., et al. 2025 b , , 985, L20

    2025

  52. [60]

    Yuan , Z. S. & Han , J. L. 2020, , 497, 5485

    2020

  53. [61]

    W., Mantz , A., & Werner , N

    Zhuravleva , I., Allen , S. W., Mantz , A., & Werner , N. 2018, , 865, 53

    2018

  54. [62]

    A., et al

    Zhuravleva , I., Churazov , E., Schekochihin , A. A., et al. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 832

    2019

  55. [63]

    A., Markevitch , M., & Johnson , R

    ZuHone , J. A., Markevitch , M., & Johnson , R. E. 2010, , 717, 908

    2010

  56. [64]

    A., Miller , E

    ZuHone , J. A., Miller , E. D., Simionescu , A., & Bautz , M. W. 2016, , 821, 6

    2016

  57. [65]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sent...

  58. [66]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.