Instantaneous optical selection rule for independent control of valley currents

Di Wu; Liang Li; Peixiang Lu; Pengfei Lan; Wanzhu He; Xiaosong Zhu; Xiaotong Zhu

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Instantaneous optical selection rule for independent control of valley currents

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes an instantaneous optical valley selection rule: the sign of the field's optical chirality at the moment of ionization determines whether the K or K' valley is excited, and a single chirality-separated field can then dr

desk verdict The instantaneous chirality-based valley selection rule is a real step forward, but Eq. (4) rests on an unverified symmetric-gap approximation that may break at strong fields. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.07612 v2 pith:43TOHGZX submitted 2025-08-11 physics.optics

Wanzhu He , Xiaosong Zhu , Liang Li , Di Wu , Xiaotong Zhu , Pengfei Lan , Peixiang Lu This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.optics

keywords valleytronicsinstantaneousopticalchiralityvalleyselectionrulecurrentchirality-separatedfieldbicirculartwo-dimensionalmaterialssub-cyclecontrol

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the old optical valley selection rule--which valley gets excited by circularly polarized light--has an instantaneous version: at the exact moment an electron makes an interband transition, the sign of the field's instantaneous optical chirality, the rotation sense of its polarization direction, decides whether the K or K' valley is populated. The central result is a compact formula (Eq. 4) for the valley-population imbalance, $\eta_{vp} = -\tanh(2 c(t_i) \zeta_g \bar{E}_g / g_0)$, so the rule is quantitative, not just qualitative. The authors then argue that a single synthesized field, made from two co-rotating bicircular components, can carry opposite chirality signs in different sub-cycle lobes while biasing those lobes in different directions. That is enough to push the K and K' electrons along independently chosen paths within one optical cycle, yielding 100%-purity valley-polarized currents and pure valley currents with zero net charge. A sympathetic reader would care because this turns the valley degree of freedom from a synchronized binary switch into a per-cycle, per-valley control dial.

What carries the argument

Equation (4), the tanh valley-polarization formula, is the load-bearing object. It follows from rewriting the third term of the accumulated interband phase $S[k(t)]$ as an integral over $c(t')\, \zeta[k(t')]$; the chirality of the two-band system is $\zeta \approx +1$ near K and $-1$ near K$'$, and the field chirality is $c(t) = n_y \partial_t n_x - n_x \partial_t n_y$. The formula converts the sign of $c$ at ionization time into a population imbalance, and the factor $g_0$ (the ionization-wavelet width) sets the scale over which the rule saturates. On the field-construction side, the co-rotating bicircular basis of Eq. (5) supplies the chirality-separated waveform: the two lobes of the Liss

What would settle it

Solve the full time-dependent Schrödinger equation for a two-band hexagonal lattice driven by one of the chirality-separated fields of Fig. 3 at an intensity where $|\mathbf{A}(t_i)|$ is large enough that $E_{cv}[\mathbf{K}+\mathbf{A}(t_i)]$ differs from $E_{cv}[\mathbf{K}'+\mathbf{A}(t_i)]$ by more than about 10%. Compute $\eta_{vp}$ at instants like $t_1, t_2, t_3$ of Fig. 2. If the imbalance no longer tracks $-\tanh(2 c(t_i) \zeta_g \bar{E}_g / g_0)$, or if changing $\varphi$ by $\pi$ fails to reverse the K/K$'$ current directions as predicted, the instantaneous rule is only an approximatio

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's terms, the central discovery is the instantaneous optical valley selection rule. In the interband transition phase, the term involving the time derivative of the field's polarization direction factorizes into the product of the instantaneous optical chirality $c(t)$ and the valley-dependent chirality $\zeta(k)$. For an electron born at time $t_i$ via an ionization wavelet, each valley's population is set by a tanh law, $\eta_{vp} = -\tanh(2 c(t_i) \zeta_g \bar{E}_g / g_0)$, so the sign of $c(t_i)$ alone selects the valley. Because oppositely signed chirality can be concentrated in different halves of an optical cycle of a synthesized field (two co-rotating bicircular beams of

Load-bearing premise

The tanh formula assumes that the energy gap seen at the two momentarily shifted valleys is the same, $\bar{E}_g = E_{cv}[\mathbf{K}+\mathbf{A}(t_i)] \approx E_{cv}[\mathbf{K}'+\mathbf{A}(t_i)]$, and that a single constant $g_0$ describes the ionization-wavelet width; if a strong vector potential breaks this symmetry, the clean sign-only selection rule can be corrupted.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A single chirality-separated field can produce valley-polarized currents with purity $P = \pm 1$ (100%) by detecting along directions orthogonal to the two valley currents.
Pure valley current with zero net charge transport ($Q = 1$ to at least four decimal places) can be generated robustly against laser intensity fluctuations over two orders of magnitude.
The K and K$'$ currents can be rotated independently by tuning the relative phase $\varphi$ of the fundamental and second-harmonic components, including the case where one valley's current stays fixed while the other rotates arbitrarily.
The independent control operates on the optical-cycle timescale (a 12-$T_0$ pulse with a 10-$T_0$ plateau), much faster than approaches relying on electrodes or heterostructures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The sign-only character of Eq. (4) suggests that any waveform whose Lissajous figure contains sub-cycle segments of opposite rotation sense--not just the two-color co-rotating construction--could serve as a valley router, so harmonic ratios beyond 2:1 or polarization gating may generalize the scheme.
Because the tanh saturates, the purity of each lobe's selection can be tuned continuously by lobe intensity rather than only by waveform geometry; the authors' 100% and zero-charge demonstrations are the two endpoints of a continuous family.
The derivation assumes the ionization-wavelet picture and a symmetric gap at the shifted momenta, so it is likely most faithful for low-frequency fields and moderate intensities; testing the rule with few-cycle mid-infrared pulses where $\mathbf{A}(t)$ is strong would reveal whether a correction term proportional to $E_{cv}[\mathbf{K}+\mathbf{A}] - E_{cv}[\mathbf{K}'+\mathbf{A}]$ is needed.
An attosecond pump-probe experiment that measures the K/K$'$ emission asymmetry as a function of carrier-envelope phase could directly read out the instantaneous chirality $c(t_i)$ of a pulse, turning the rule into a diagnostic of sub-cycle field structure.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick read. The genuinely new thing is the instantaneous optical valley selection rule: use the sign of the instantaneous chirality c(ti) at ionization time, rather than the cycle-averaged helicity, to pick K versus K'. That is a real step beyond the bicircular-field work, and the chirality-separated field construction is elegant. The two applications—complete spatial separation of valley currents and pure valley current with zero net charge—follow from the same picture, and the numerics look consistent.

The soft spot is exactly the one in the stress-test. Eq. (4) uses E[K+A(ti)] ≈ E[K'+A(ti)]. That is not symmetry-protected. Time reversal relates the valleys as E(K+q)=E(K'-q), so the equality holds only if the dispersion near each valley is locally even in q. Trigonal warping breaks that, and the difference grows with |A|. At the strongest fields quoted (10^12 W/cm^2, 4000 nm), A is not small on the BZ scale, so the tanh argument in Eq. (4) could be off by a large factor. The sign rule likely survives—that is the main claim—but the quantitative population imbalance and the 100% purity numbers are model-dependent. The authors do not claim symmetry protection; they just introduce the approximation without justifying its range. The derivation is in the SM, which I could not see. A referee must check it.

Also worth saying: the numerical demonstration is not an independent test. The ionization-wavelet picture and the interband phase are the authors' own framework, so the simulations confirm the framework without falsifying it. That is fine for a theory paper, but it means the impressive purity numbers are not external predictions.

Credit: the paper is clearly written, cites the prior work fairly, and flags the approximation rather than hiding it. The field design and the two example applications are new and useful.

Recommendation: send it to a serious referee. Ask specifically whether Eq. (4) holds against a full band-structure calculation with trigonal warping, and where the approximation breaks. If it survives at the quoted intensities, this is a strong PRL-class result. If not, the sign rule stays, but the quantitative claims need revision.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an instantaneous optical valley selection rule in two-dimensional hexagonal systems: the population imbalance between K and K′ valleys produced by an ionization wavelet at time t_i is given by η_vp = -tanh(2 c(t_i) ζ_g Ebar_g / g0) (Eq. 4), where c(t_i) is the instantaneous optical chirality, ζ_g is the system chirality, and Ebar_g is the (approximately valley-symmetric) gap. This rule is used to design 'chirality-separated' bicircular fields, with opposite subcycle optical chirality and biased vector-potential lobes, claimed to enable independent control of K and K′ valley currents. The authors demonstrate numerically the rotation of valley current directions with phase φ, the complete orthogonal separation of valley currents (P reaching ±1), and the generation of a pure valley current with zero net charge (Q = 1 to four decimal places).

Significance. If established, this is a valuable step beyond cycle-averaged valley selection: it identifies the subcycle ionization time as the control handle and shows how a single field can address the two valleys separately. The explicit closed-form selection rule, the clear field-design rationale, and the numerical demonstrations are strengths. The sign-based mechanism is physically plausible and consistent with prior work on interband excitation. However, the quantitative validity of Eq. (4) is not sufficiently supported in the present manuscript, because its derivation and the symmetric-gap approximation are not presented, and the role of the parameter g0 is unspecified. These gaps prevent full confidence in the claimed 100% purity and pure-valley-current results.

major comments (3)

[Instantaneous optical valley selection rule, Eq. (4)] Equation (4) is the quantitative core of the paper, but its derivation is only cited to the Supplemental Material and the approximation Ebar_g = Ecv[K+A(ti)] ≈ Ecv[K′+A(ti)] is stated without proof or validity conditions. Time-reversal symmetry relates Ecv(K+q) to Ecv(K′−q), not to Ecv(K′+q); the equality therefore requires additional conditions, e.g., negligible trigonal warping. At the strongest intensities considered (up to 1e12 W/cm² at 4000 nm, Fig. 5(d)), A(ti) is not parametrically small on the Brillouin-zone scale, so the gap values can differ substantially. The sign of c(ti)ζg may still select the valley, but the quantitative tanh rule and the purity values derived from it are unverified. Please include the derivation or a direct validation of Eq. (4) against the full numerical model for multiple ionization instants and intensities, and state the regime of validity.
[Eq. (4) and Fig. 2] The formula contains g0, described only as 'a constant that describes the width of the ionization wavelet.' The main text does not state how g0 is determined. If g0 is fitted to simulations, the agreement in Fig. 2 is not an independent test of the selection rule; if it is computed from first principles, the defining expression should be given. Without this information, the quantitative predictions (including the 100% purity claims in Applications 1 and 2) are not reproducible from the main text alone.
[Fig. 5(d) and Applications 1–2] The pure-valley-current claim rests on the statement that Q = 1 to four decimal places over the intensity range. No convergence tests, numerical grid parameters, or error estimates are provided in the main text. Because the cancellation Jcharge = 0 is partly enforced by mirror symmetry, it would be helpful to state whether Q = 1 is a symmetry-protected result or a numerical outcome, and to specify the numerical accuracy of the computed currents. Similarly, the P = ±1 points in Fig. 4(d) should be clarified: they appear to follow from projection orthogonality of the two valley currents rather than from a valley-resolved carrier-counting purity, which should be stated explicitly to avoid overinterpretation.

minor comments (5)

[Introduction] Typo: 'nonvalishing valley currents' should be 'nonvanishing valley currents'.
[Fig. 3 and accompanying text] The caption labels panels as (a) and (c-d), but the text refers to 'Figs. 3(b) and (c)'. Renumber the figure panels and fix the cross-references.
[Eq. (1)] Please define all symbols in one place, especially Rcv and dcv, and clarify the notation n(t) = F(t)/||F(t)|| and ˙n(t). The physical dimensions of the three terms in the integrand should be stated.
[Eq. (5)] The sign convention for εco± is confusing as written: 'εco± = ∓[...]' together with 'co-rotating' should be explained, and the relationship between the handedness of the bases e± and the IOC sign should be made explicit.
[Fig. 2(a)] The 'dashed line' marking the Lissajous figure is not described in the caption; specify which curve corresponds to the driving field and where t1, t2, t3 are located.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (4) is derived from the interband phase and confirmed by independent numerics; self-citations are methodological, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central result, Eq. (4), is presented as a consequence of the accumulated interband phase in Eq. (1), after recasting the polarization-rotation term through the definitions of instantaneous optical chirality c(t) and system chirality ζ(k) in Eqs. (2)-(3). The tanh form is attributed to the ionization-wavelet formalism of refs [46,47], which is prior work by the same group but is a general model for solid-state interband excitation and does not itself assert the instantaneous valley selection rule. No parameter is fitted to the valley-resolved populations in the main text: g0 appears as a model parameter describing the wavelet width, and the sign of ηvp is independent of its specific value as long as g0 > 0. The field construction uses bicircular bases from prior work (refs [25,27,48]), but that is a design choice, not a derivation of the selection rule. The numerical demonstrations solve the excitation dynamics and confirm the predicted signs (Fig. 2) and engineered current directions (Figs. 3-5); they do not appear to assume Eq. (4) as an input. The approximation Ebar_g = Ecv[K+A(ti)] ≈ Ecv[K'+A(ti)] is a validity condition for the quantitative formula, not an identity that imports the target conclusion. The derivation being relegated to the Supplemental Material is a completeness/verifiability issue, not circularity. Self-citations are methodological and do not constitute the load-bearing argument. Therefore no specific circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard solid-state models, the authors' analytic wavelet formalism, and the assumed experimental ability to synthesize the proposed fields. The only new free parameter introduced in the analytic rule is g0, the ionization-wavelet width.

free parameters (1)

g0
Width of the ionization wavelet, introduced in Eq. (4) as g0; its value is not given in the main text and it sets the quantitative scale of the population imbalance, although the sign prediction is independent of it.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Two-band approximation and acceleration theorem k(t) = k + A(t)
Standard model for interband excitation in solids, invoked in Eq. (1).
domain assumption Semiconductor Bloch equations / interband transition phase description
Eq. (1) is taken as the starting point for the derivation of the selection rule.
domain assumption Ionization wavelet picture of refs [46,47]
Used to derive Eq. (4) from Eq. (1); this is the authors' own prior framework.
standard math Symmetry analysis giving zeta(K) approx +1, zeta(K') approx -1
Rigorous from time-reversal and spatial symmetries, stated in text after Eq. (3).
domain assumption Feasibility of synthesizing chirality-separated CRBF fields
Assumes current optical technology can generate the required field in Eq. (6); no experimental demonstration.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Instantaneous optical selection rule for independent control of valley currents." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/43TOHGZX

@misc{pith2026250807612,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Instantaneous optical selection rule for independent control of valley currents},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/43TOHGZX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.07612}
}

read the original abstract

We reveal an instantaneous optical valley selection rule that illuminates the coupling between the instantaneous optical chirality of the driving laser field and the chirality of valley systems. Building on this principle, we propose and demonstrate that a single chirality-separated optical field, in which oppositely signed instantaneous optical chiralities are separated within an optical cycle, enables independent manipulation of currents from K and K' valleys. Based on this scheme, we highlight two key example applications: (1) complete separation of currents from different valleys, yielding 100%-purity valley-polarized currents, and (2) generation of pure valley current with zero net charge flow. Our work offers a robust and highly controllable all-optical strategy for ultrafast engineering valley currents in the optical cycle timescale, paving a new avenue for valleytronics and quantum information technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.07612 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. (a) Illustration of the combination of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. (a) Schematic illustration of valley current separa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

[1]

S. A. Vitale, D. Nezich, J. O. Varghese, P. Kim, N. Gedik, P. Jarillo-Herrero, D. Xiao, and M. Rothschild, Val- leytronics: Opportunities, Challenges, and Paths For- ward, Small 14, 1801483 (2018)

work page 2018
[2]

K. F. Mak, K. L. McGill, J. Park, and P. L. McEuen, The valley Hall effect in MoS2 transistors, Science 344, 1489 (2014)

2014
[3]

Jiang, W

C. Jiang, W. Xu, A. Rasmita, Z. Huang, K. Li, Q. Xiong, and W.-b. Gao, Microsecond dark-exciton valley polar- ization memory in two-dimensional heterostructures, Na- ture Communications 9, 753 (2018)

work page 2018
[4]

J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Valleytronics in 2D materials, Nature Reviews Materials 1, 1 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

De Giovannini, H

U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, Monitor- ing Electron-Photon Dressing in WSe2, Nano Letters 16, 7993 (2016)

work page 2016
[6]

Gupta, K

G. Gupta, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and K. Ma- jumdar, Observation of 100% valley-coherent excitons in monolayer MoS2 through giant enhancement of valley coherence time, Light: Science & Applications 12, 173 (2023)

work page 2023
[7]

H. Yu, X. Cui, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Valley excitons in two- dimensional semiconductors, National Science Review 2, 57 (2015)

work page 2015
[8]

Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R

´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R. E. F. Silva, O. Smirnova, and M. Ivanov, Sub-cycle valleytronics: Control of valley po- larization using few-cycle linearly polarized pulses, Op- tica 8, 277 (2021)

work page 2021

Show all 54 references

[9]

W. Li, X. Zhu, P. Lan, K. Wang, W. He, H. H¨ ubener, U. D. Giovannini, and P. Lu, Attosecond All-Optical Re- trieval of Valley Polarization via Circular Dichroism in Transient Absorption (2024), arXiv:2412.19612 [physics]

2024 arXiv
[10]

C. Jin, J. Kim, M. I. B. Utama, E. C. Regan, H. Klee- mann, H. Cai, Y. Shen, M. J. Shinner, A. Sengupta, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, and F. Wang, Imaging of pure spin-valley diffusion current in WS2-WSe2 heterostructures, Science 360, 893 (2018)

2018
[11]

Settnes, S

M. Settnes, S. R. Power, M. Brandbyge, and A.-P. Jauho, Graphene Nanobubbles as Valley Filters and Beam Split- ters, Physical Review Letters 117, 276801 (2016)

2016
[12]

J. Chen, Y. Zheng, S. Yang, F. Shi, Z.-Y. Li, and C.-W. Qiu, One-Way Valley-Robust Transport in Edge-Tailored Photonic Crystals, Physical Review Letters 134, 203803 (2025)

2025
[13]

M. Sui, G. Chen, L. Ma, W.-Y. Shan, D. Tian, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, X. Jin, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and Y. Zhang, Gate-tunable topological valley transport in bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 11, 1027 (2015)

2015
[14]

C.-C. Hsu, M. L. Teague, J.-Q. Wang, and N.-C. Yeh, Nanoscale strain engineering of giant pseudo-magnetic fields, valley polarization, and topological channels in graphene, Science Advances 6, eaat9488 (2020)

2020
[15]

Sharma, P

S. Sharma, P. Elliott, and S. Shallcross, THz induced giant spin and valley currents, Science Advances 9, eadf3673 (2023)

2023
[16]

Sharma, D

S. Sharma, D. Gill, and S. Shallcross, Giant and Control- lable Valley Currents in Graphene by Double Pumped THz Light, Nano Letters 23, 10305 (2023)

2023
[17]

D. Gill, S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, and S. Shallcross, Ultrafast all-optical generation of pure spin and valley currents, npj 2D Materials and Applications 9, 49 (2025)

2025
[18]

Langer, C

F. Langer, C. P. Schmid, S. Schlauderer, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, P. Nagler, C. Sch¨ uller, T. Korn, P. G. Hawkins, 6 J. T. Steiner, U. Huttner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, and R. Huber, Lightwave valleytronics in a monolayer of tung- sten diselenide, Nature 557, 76 (2018)

2018
[19]

M. S. Mrudul, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, M. Ivanov, and G. Dixit, Light-induced valleytronics in pristine graphene, Optica 8, 422 (2021)

2021
[20]

Tyulnev, ´A

I. Tyulnev, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, J. Poborska, L. Vamos, P. S. J. Russell, F. Tani, O. Smirnova, M. Ivanov, R. E. F. Silva, and J. Biegert, Valleytronics in bulk MoS2 with a topologic optical field, Nature 628, 746 (2024)

2024
[21]

Mitra, ´A

S. Mitra, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, M. Aulich, M. Neuhaus, R. E. F. Silva, V. Pervak, M. F. Kling, and S. Biswas, Light-wave-controlled Haldane model in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride, Nature 628, 752 (2024)

2024
[22]

S. A. Oliaei Motlagh, J.-S. Wu, V. Apalkov, and M. I. Stockman, Femtosecond valley polarization and topolog- ical resonances in transition metal dichalcogenides, Phys- ical Review B 98, 081406 (2018)

2018
[23]

Neufeld, N

O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne-Dejean, U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, Light-Driven Extremely Non- linear Bulk Photogalvanic Currents, Physical Review Letters 127, 126601 (2021)

2021
[24]

S. A. O. Motlagh and V. Apalkov, Anomalous ultrafast all-optical Hall effect in gapped graphene, Nanophotonics 10, 3677 (2021)

2021
[25]

Rana and G

N. Rana and G. Dixit, Optical control of ultrafast pho- tocurrent in graphene, Physical Review B 110, 054105 (2024)

2024
[26]

Sharma, D

S. Sharma, D. Gill, J. Krishna, J. K. Dewhurst, and S. Shallcross, Direct coupling of light to valley current, Nature Communications 15, 7579 (2024)

2024
[27]

W. Li, X. Zhu, L. Li, W. He, J. Long, P. Lan, and P. Lu, High-purity valley-polarized currents induced by bichro- matic optical fields in two-dimensional materials, Physi- cal Review B 111, 115406 (2025)

2025
[28]

D. M. B. Lesko, T. Weitz, S. Wittigschlager, W. Li, C. Heide, O. Neufeld, and P. Hommelhoff, Optical con- trol of electrons in a Floquet topological insulator (2025), arXiv:2407.17917 [physics]

2025 arXiv
[29]

D. Gill, S. Sharma, K. Dewhurst, and S. Shallcross, Cre- ation and control of valley currents in graphene by few cycle light pulses, npj Computational Materials 11, 185 (2025)

2025
[30]

W. Yao, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Valley-dependent opto- electronics from inversion symmetry breaking, Physical Review B 77, 235406 (2008)

2008
[31]

K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Control of valley polarization in monolayer MoS2 by optical helicity, Nature Nanotechnology 7, 494 (2012)

2012
[32]

Geondzhian, A

A. Geondzhian, A. Rubio, and M. Altarelli, Valley selec- tivity of soft x-ray excitations of core electrons in two- dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Review B 106, 115433 (2022)

2022
[33]

Herrmann, S

P. Herrmann, S. Klimmer, T. Lettau, T. Weickhardt, A. Papavasileiou, K. Mosina, Z. Sofer, I. Paradisanos, D. Kartashov, J. Wilhelm, and G. Soavi, Nonlinear val- ley selection rules and all-optical probe of broken time- reversal symmetry in monolayer WSe2, Nature Photonics 19, ...

2025
[34]

Hashmi, M

A. Hashmi, M. U. Farooq, M. Tani, K. Yabana, T. Otobe, and K. L. Ishikawa, Ultrafast Optical Control of Multi- Valley States in 2D SnS (2025), arXiv:2503.09092 [physics]

2025
[35]

H. Cui, L. Li, T. Huang, J. Li, P. Lan, and P. Lu, Valley- resolved interband excitation and emission in gapped graphene, Physical Review A 106, 043505 (2022)

2022
[36]

S. A. Oliaei Motlagh, F. Nematollahi, V. Apalkov, and M. I. Stockman, Topological resonance and single- optical-cycle valley polarization in gapped graphene, Physical Review B 100, 115431 (2019)

2019
[37]

A. M. Parks, J. V. Moloney, and T. Brabec, Bloch gauge symmetry of the semiconductor Bloch equations [Invited], Journal of the Optical Society of America B 41, B47 (2024)

2024
[38]

Chac´ on, D

A. Chac´ on, D. Kim, W. Zhu, S. P. Kelly, A. Dauphin, E. Pisanty, A. S. Maxwell, A. Pic´ on, M. F. Ciappina, D. E. Kim, C. Ticknor, A. Saxena, and M. Lewenstein, Circular dichroism in higher-order harmonic generation: Heralding topological phases and transitions in Chern in- s...

2020
[39]

See Supplemental Material for a detailed derivation of the sub-cycle OVSR, the construction of chirality-separated fields, and details of the simulations, which includes Refs.[35–37, 40, 41, 52–54]
[40]

J. Li, X. Zhang, S. Fu, Y. Feng, B. Hu, and H. Du, Phase invariance of the semiconductor Bloch equations, Physi- cal Review A 100, 043404 (2019)

2019
[41]

C. Qian, C. Yu, S. Jiang, T. Zhang, J. Gao, S. Shi, H. Pi, H. Weng, and R. Lu, Role of Shift Vector in High- Harmonic Generation from Noncentrosymmetric Topo- logical Insulators under Strong Laser Fields, Physical Re- view X 12, 021030 (2022)

2022
[42]

Tang and A

Y. Tang and A. E. Cohen, Enhanced Enantioselectivity in Excitation of Chiral Molecules by Superchiral Light, Science 332, 333 (2011)

2011
[43]

Neufeld and O

O. Neufeld and O. Cohen, Optical Chirality in Nonlin- ear Optics: Application to High Harmonic Generation, Physical Review Letters 120, 133206 (2018)

2018
[44]

Rozen, A

S. Rozen, A. Comby, E. Bloch, S. Beauvarlet, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, S. Petit, V. Blanchet, B. Pons, N. Dudovich, and Y. Mairesse, Controlling Subcycle Op- tical Chirality in the Photoionization of Chiral Molecules, Physical Review X 9, 031004 (2019)

2019
[45]

(2) differs from that given in the references by a factor of the electric field amplitude

The definition in Eq. (2) differs from that given in the references by a factor of the electric field amplitude
[46]

L. Li, P. Lan, X. Zhu, and P. Lu, Huygens-Fresnel Picture for High Harmonic Generation in Solids, Physical Review Letters 127, 223201 (2021)

2021
[47]

L. Li, P. Lan, X. Zhu, and P. Lu, High harmonic gener- ation in solids: Particle and wave perspectives, Reports on Progress in Physics 86, 116401 (2023)

2023
[48]

X. Zhu, P. Lu, and M. Lein, Control of the Geomet- ric Phase and Nonequivalence between Geometric-Phase Definitions in the Adiabatic Limit, Physical Review Let- ters 128, 030401 (2022)

2022
[49]

R. V. Gorbachev, J. C. W. Song, G. L. Yu, A. V. Kre- tinin, F. Withers, Y. Cao, A. Mishchenko, I. V. Grig- orieva, K. S. Novoselov, L. S. Levitov, and A. K. Geim, Detecting topological currents in graphene superlattices, Science 346, 448 (2014)

2014
[50]

W.-Y. Shan, J. Zhou, and D. Xiao, Optical genera- tion and detection of pure valley current in monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides, Physical Review B 91, 035402 (2015)

2015
[51]

Shimazaki, M

Y. Shimazaki, M. Yamamoto, I. V. Borzenets, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, and S. Tarucha, Generation and detec- tion of pure valley current by electrically induced Berry 7 curvature in bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 11, 1032 (2015)

2015
[52]

Dimitrovski, L

D. Dimitrovski, L. B. Madsen, and T. G. Pedersen, High-order harmonic generation from gapped graphene: Perturbative response and transition to nonperturbative regime, Physical Review B 95, 035405 (2017)

2017
[53]

L. Li, P. Lan, X. Zhu, T. Huang, Q. Zhang, M. Lein, and P. Lu, Reciprocal-Space-Trajectory Perspective on High- Harmonic Generation in Solids, Physical Review Letters 122, 193901 (2019)

2019
[54]

A. M. Parks, J. V. Moloney, and T. Brabec, Gauge Invari- ant Formulation of the Semiconductor Bloch Equations, Physical Review Letters 131, 236902 (2023)

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

S. A. Vitale, D. Nezich, J. O. Varghese, P. Kim, N. Gedik, P. Jarillo-Herrero, D. Xiao, and M. Rothschild, Val- leytronics: Opportunities, Challenges, and Paths For- ward, Small 14, 1801483 (2018)

work page 2018

[2] [2]

K. F. Mak, K. L. McGill, J. Park, and P. L. McEuen, The valley Hall effect in MoS2 transistors, Science 344, 1489 (2014)

2014

[3] [3]

Jiang, W

C. Jiang, W. Xu, A. Rasmita, Z. Huang, K. Li, Q. Xiong, and W.-b. Gao, Microsecond dark-exciton valley polar- ization memory in two-dimensional heterostructures, Na- ture Communications 9, 753 (2018)

work page 2018

[4] [4]

J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Valleytronics in 2D materials, Nature Reviews Materials 1, 1 (2016)

work page 2016

[5] [5]

De Giovannini, H

U. De Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, Monitor- ing Electron-Photon Dressing in WSe2, Nano Letters 16, 7993 (2016)

work page 2016

[6] [6]

Gupta, K

G. Gupta, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and K. Ma- jumdar, Observation of 100% valley-coherent excitons in monolayer MoS2 through giant enhancement of valley coherence time, Light: Science & Applications 12, 173 (2023)

work page 2023

[7] [7]

H. Yu, X. Cui, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Valley excitons in two- dimensional semiconductors, National Science Review 2, 57 (2015)

work page 2015

[8] [8]

Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R

´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R. E. F. Silva, O. Smirnova, and M. Ivanov, Sub-cycle valleytronics: Control of valley po- larization using few-cycle linearly polarized pulses, Op- tica 8, 277 (2021)

work page 2021