Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 94 references

EchoAid: Enhancing Livestream Shopping Accessibility for the DHH Community

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A system that condenses fast livestream sales talk into short, structured text can help deaf and hard-of-hearing viewers remember more product details and feel less mentally overloaded than with raw captions.

desk verdict The system is a real contribution, but the retention claim is overhyped; the memory test is borderline and partially circular, so the paper needs revision before the central claim is accepted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.08020 v1 pith:64IO5IZJ submitted 2025-08-11 cs.HC

Zeyu Yang , Zheng Wei , Yang Zhang , Xian Xu , Changyang He , Muzhi Zhou , Pan Hui This is my paper
classification cs.HC
keywords livestreamshoppingdeafandhardofhearingaccessibilityrapidserialvisualpresentation(RSVP)LLMsummarizationcognitiveloadspeech-to-textinformationoverloadmobileappdesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the design and test of EchoAid, a smartphone overlay meant to make livestream shopping usable for deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) viewers. Its claim is that converting the host's rapid speech into condensed, structured text—an LLM summary refreshed every 30 seconds, shown through rapid serial visual presentation and a fixed eight-category sales framework—reduces information overload and information loss. In a between-subjects study with 38 DHH participants, the EchoAid group reported lower cognitive load and remembered more product facts than a group using a standard real-time transcription app. The contribution is a working accessibility route for a fast-paced e-commerce format where verbatim captions are especially unwieldy.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a three-stage pipeline: (1) a speech-to-text engine captures the host's audio; (2) a large language model condenses each 30-second window into a short summary and fills an eight-field sales template—promotional policy, free shipping, 7-day return, price, after-sales, product introduction, usage experience, user manual; (3) the condensed text is presented through Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP), which shows words one at a time to reduce eye movement, alongside emoji icons and a customizable floating window. The eight-field template converts an unstructured audio stream into a structured, reviewable summary; RSVP is what keeps the visual load low.

What would settle it

Run a preregistered replication with a memory test that includes questions outside EchoAid's eight fixed dimensions (host anecdotes, tone, product comparisons) and an incentivized purchase-choice task. If the EchoAid advantage over verbatim captions disappears or reverses on those items, the reported benefit is an artifact of aligning the quiz with the summary schema rather than a general reduction in information overload.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

EchoAid runs alongside a livestream shopping video: it captures the device's audio, sends it to a speech-to-text service, feeds the transcript to a large language model, and shows the result in three user-selectable formats—raw text, a condensed RSVP line, and a structured summary covering promotional policy, free shipping, returns, price, after-sales, product introduction, usage experience, and user manual. The paper's central empirical claim is that this pipeline lets DHH viewers follow fast sales talk with less mental effort and better retention than verbatim captions. Support comes from a 38-participant between-group study against the iFlytek Hearing app: the EchoAid group had higher mea

Load-bearing premise

The benefit rests on the fact that the evaluation asks for exactly the kinds of information EchoAid is built to extract; if quiz answers or real shopping decisions require information outside those eight categories, the measured gains may not generalize.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, DHH consumers can follow livestream shopping without juggling a second device or missing time-limited offers, because key sales facts appear compactly on the same screen.
  • The structured summary persists and can be saved locally, letting viewers check price, shipping, and return terms after the host has moved on—something verbatim captions do not provide.
  • Because EchoAid works as a floating overlay, the benefit is not tied to one retailer or platform; it can attach to any Android-based livestream app.
  • The design suggests a general recipe for high-density audio accessibility: capture speech, condense it into a fixed schema, and present it serially.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same capture–condense–serialize pattern could transfer to lectures, meetings, or live sports commentary, where verbatim captions are equally overwhelming; a testable extension would replace the eight shopping dimensions with domain-specific schemas.
  • Editorial inference: the memory test asks largely for the same categories EchoAid is built to extract, so part of the measured gain may reflect test-schema alignment rather than general comprehension; an independent quiz on host tone, off-script asides, or product comparisons would separate the two.
  • Editorial inference: the 30–40 second refresh window is set by LLM latency; faster models would allow event-driven refreshes (e.g., when a new price or product is mentioned), which might further reduce overload during flash-sale sequences.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. EchoAid is an Android accessibility app that overlays livestream shopping with iFlytek speech-to-text, ERNIE LLM summarization every 30 seconds, RSVP condensed text, a structured summary framework, and customizable floating-window/GUI elements. The paper reports three studies: semi-structured interviews with 8 DHH users to identify accessibility challenges; an iterative design trial with 3 DHH users; and a between-subjects user study with 38 DHH participants comparing EchoAid against the iFlytek Hearing app on a system-experience questionnaire, NASA-TLX, a 10-item live-information memory test, and follow-up interviews. The central claim is that EchoAid significantly enhances information retention and reduces cognitive load for DHH livestream shoppers.

Significance. The work addresses an under-studied and important accessibility problem: DHH users' access to fast-paced livestream shopping. The contribution combines LLM summarization, RSVP, and customizable presentation in a working, openly released Android prototype, grounded in co-design with DHH participants. The NASA-TLX results and the system-experience questionnaire provide largely positive, independent evidence for reduced self-reported cognitive load and improved usability. However, the information-retention half of the central claim is currently unsupported as reported: the memory test has no inferential statistic, and its items are aligned with the system's own fixed summary dimensions. If the authors report the missing analysis, address the instrument-alignment issue, and adjust the claims, the paper would make a solid contribution; in its present form the central claim is not fully evidenced.

major comments (3)
  1. [§6.3 and Abstract/§1] The retention claim is not statistically supported as reported. Section 6.3 gives EchoAid mean 6.53 (SD 1.71) versus iFlytek mean 5.32 (SD 1.97), n=19 per group, describes the result as 'marginally outperforms,' and gives no test statistic or p-value. The Abstract and Section 1 nevertheless claim EchoAid 'significantly enhances information retention.' A Welch t-test on the summary statistics gives t≈2.02, p≈0.051, which is not below 0.05; the planned Mann-Whitney U test is not reported. Please report the exact test, effect size, and confidence interval, and either adjust the retention claim to a trend or provide the inferential result that supports 'significant.' This is load-bearing for the first half of the central claim.
  2. [Appendix A.2.3, Table A3, Appendix A.1.1] There is a potential circularity in the memory-test design. The summary-framework prompt forces the LLM to output eight fixed fields: promotional policy, free shipping, 7-day return, price, after-sales service, product introduction, usage experience, and user manual. The Live Information Memory Test (Table A3) asks questions drawn from the same five dimensions (product features, discount policies, price changes, 7-day no-reason returns, product functionality), and the accuracy criteria in Appendix A.1.1 are likewise keyed to these dimensions. Thus the measured retention advantage may partly reflect a match between the test and EchoAid's designed output schema rather than general retention of livestream information. Please either add memory probes that fall outside the fixed eight dimensions, or explicitly reframe the claim as retention of EchoAid's structured sales categories and treat t
  3. [§5.3 and §6.2] Two between-group details weaken the cognitive-load evidence as reported. First, participants in the EchoAid group received a 5–10 minute tutorial before testing; the iFlytek group is not described as receiving an equivalent familiarization. This asymmetry can inflate both subjective ratings and memory performance. Second, §6.2 states that 'across all dimensions' NASA-TLX scores were significantly lower, but inferential statistics are reported only for Mental Demand, Temporal Demand, Effort, and Frustration; Physical Demand and Performance are missing. Please report all six NASA-TLX dimensions with their U/p/effect-size values and state whether the baseline group received matched training.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§1 vs §5.1] Section 1 says the user study involved '18 DHH participants,' but Section 5.1 and Section 5.3 report 38 participants. This inconsistency should be corrected.
  2. [Figure 10, §6.3] The figure shows only individual scores. Add a distribution/boxplot with a paired or independent comparison marker so readers can assess overlap, and label the threshold line clearly.
  3. [Appendix A.2] The Chinese prompts appear as garbled glyphs in the submitted text. Ensure the final typeset version renders the original Chinese characters correctly, since these prompts are central to understanding the system behavior.
  4. [§5.3, Table A3] The text says the memory test has 10 questions with '2 questions per dimension,' but Table A3 lists five dimensions. Make the dimension-to-question mapping explicit and align the wording.
  5. [§6.1] The system-experience questionnaire questions are numbered Q1–Q12 in the section text, but the numbering jumps to Q11/Q12 for the 'Viewing interest' items; renumber for readability.
  6. [Notation] The baseline system is referred to inconsistently as 'iFlytek,' 'iFLYTEK,' and 'iFlytek Hearing'; standardize the naming. Also fix the typo 'MSU test' in §6.1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; EchoAid's central claim rests on an empirical between-group comparison with an independent baseline and standard instruments.

full rationale

EchoAid is an empirical HCI systems paper, not a formal derivation: the central claim is that DHH users retain more livestream-shopping information and experience lower cognitive load with EchoAid than with iFlytek Hearing. That claim is tested with a between-group user study, a neutral NASA-TLX instrument, and a memory test over actual video content. The overlap between the Summary Framework Display's eight output dimensions (Appendix A.2.3) and the memory-test categories (Table A3) is a design-alignment/generalizability concern, not circularity: the LLM still has to process real, noisy livestream audio, and participants must recall correct factual details; the test score is not defined as EchoAid's output, and iFlytek users answer the same questions. The system reliability evaluation similarly scores whether information is correctly displayed against manually recorded key information; sharing categories with the prompt does not by itself make correct extraction automatic. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem appears: the few self-citations in related work support background statements about livestream commerce and immersive media, not the paper's core evaluation. The paper also states explicit limitations (Section 7.6: no purchasing-behavior measurement, robustness failures, dialect limitations, and sign-language-preference users), confirming the claims are bounded empirical findings rather than tautologies. A separate, non-circularity concern is that Section 6.3 reports the memory-test advantage only as 'marginally outperforms' with no significance test, while the abstract claims 'significant' enhancement; that is a statistical-support and reporting issue, not a circularity issue.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

EchoAid introduces no new physical or conceptual entities; it combines existing software components. The ledger instead records the hand-chosen design parameters (LLM window, eight summary dimensions, 50-word cap, pass threshold) and the domain assumptions implicit in the evaluation.

free parameters (4)
  • LLM summarization window = 30 s (body) / 40 s (appendix)
    Section 4.2.2 says condensation refreshes every 30 seconds, while Appendix A.2.1 specifies a 40-second input window; the unresolved discrepancy affects how much context the LLM sees and thus the summary quality.
  • Summary framework dimensions = 8 dimensions
    Prompt3 in Appendix A.2.3 defines eight output categories (promotional policy, free shipping, return policy, price, after-sales, product intro, usage experience, user manual). The memory test questions are built on these same categories, so this hand-chosen schema shapes the evaluation outcome.
  • Summary length cap = max 50 words
    Prompt1 in Appendix A.2.1 instructs the LLM to condense to at most 50 words; this cap controls the amount of information reduction EchoAid provides.
  • Memory test pass threshold = 5/10
    Section 5.3 defines passing as 5 or more correct answers; this threshold is used to describe group performance but is not justified by external criteria.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption S-O-R model appropriately characterizes livestream shopping stimuli and DHH consumer response
    Section 2.2 uses Stimulus-Organism-Response as the framework guiding design and evaluation; its applicability to DHH livestream shopping is asserted, not tested.
  • domain assumption NASA-TLX self-reports measure cognitive load in this population
    Section 5.3 uses NASA-TLX as the cognitive load outcome; its validity for DHH users comparing two screen-reading tasks is assumed.
  • domain assumption RSVP presentation improves comprehension for DHH readers
    Section 2.4 relies on prior literature to justify RSVP; EchoAid itself is not tested against alternative display modes.
  • domain assumption iFlytek ASR and ERNIE LLM accurately transcribe and summarize Mandarin livestream audio
    Sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 depend on commercial APIs; errors are acknowledged in Section 4.3.2, but the user-study outcomes assume sufficient accuracy.
  • domain assumption Participants' self-reported hearing loss and livestream experience define the DHH sample
    Recruitment criteria in Sections 3.1 and 5.1 rely on self-report and prior platform use, which the authors acknowledge may not generalize (Section 7.6).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EchoAid: Enhancing Livestream Shopping Accessibility for the DHH Community." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/64IO5IZJ

@misc{pith2026250808020,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EchoAid: Enhancing Livestream Shopping Accessibility for the DHH Community},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/64IO5IZJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.08020}
}
read the original abstract

Livestream shopping platforms often overlook the accessibility needs of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH) community, leading to barriers such as information inaccessibility and overload. To tackle these challenges, we developed \textit{EchoAid}, a mobile app designed to improve the livestream shopping experience for DHH users. \textit{EchoAid} utilizes advanced speech-to-text conversion, Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP) technology, and Large Language Models (LLMs) to simplify the complex information flow in live sales environments. We conducted exploratory studies with eight DHH individuals to identify design needs and iteratively developed the \textit{EchoAid} prototype based on feedback from three participants. We then evaluate the performance of this system in a user study workshop involving 38 DHH participants. Our findings demonstrate the successful design and validation process of \textit{EchoAid}, highlighting its potential to enhance product information extraction, leading to reduced cognitive overload and more engaging and customized shopping experiences for DHH users.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.08020 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The S-O-R (Stimulus-Organism-Response) model in livestream shopping illustrates how factors like [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Research design. Initial interviews identified four key challenges. Based on these findings, six design [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. System architecture. Main Activity (①) provides the main interface, allowing users to adjust the ap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: EchoAid Floating Window Interface Functions: (1) Click to activate the software floating window mode. 1-2: Open History Saved Text Folder button, displays saved text history when clicked. (2) 2-1: Start/End Capture button, initiates/stops recording for in-camera sound …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Interface customization options in EchoAid: (1) Slide from top to bottom to adjust the width and height of the floating window, the size of subtitles, and the transparency of subtitles; (2, 3, 4) Customize the floating window with three different background choices. Bu…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Participants’ operation with EchoAid: (1) Raw text display interface; (2) Condensed Text display in￾terface; (3) Summary framework display interface; (4) Using EchoAid to assist in watching live e-commerce platforms; (5) Using iFlytek to assist in viewing live e-commer…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Operational flow in the iFLYTEK group (top) and in the EchoAid group. (1) iFLYTEK subtitles con￾stantly appear on the screen along with the host’s speech, sometimes covering product images and host’s facial expression and gestures. Users have to constantly check the su…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Participants’ ratings on the system experience questionnaire: X-axis: Participants’ ratings on Usability, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Participants’ ratings on the NASA TLX scale. X-axis: Six dimensions assessing the psychological load [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Test scores for Live information memory. X-axis: Participant IDs, and Y-axis: score. The red line in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wan Anita Wan Abas, Moniza Waheed, et al. 2024. The Influence Of Anchor Characteristics On Purchasing Behavior: A Systematic Review.Migration Letters 21, S2 (2024), 1038–1063

    2024

  2. [2]

    Readingdevelopmentofstudentswhoaredeafandhardofhearingininclusiveeducation classrooms

    KhalidNasserAlasim.2019. Readingdevelopmentofstudentswhoaredeafandhardofhearingininclusiveeducation classrooms. Education Sciences 9, 3 (2019), 201

    2019

  3. [3]

    Saifeddin Alimamy and Juergen Gnoth. 2022. I want it my way! The effect of perceptions of personalization through augmented reality and online shopping on customer intentions to co-create value.Computers in Human Behavior 128 (2022), 107105

    2022

  4. [4]

    Miriam Arnold, Mascha Goldschmitt, and Thomas Rigotti. 2023. Dealing with information overload: a comprehensive review. Frontiers in Psychology 14 (2023), 1122200

    2023

  5. [5]

    Grigoris Bastas, Maximos Kaliakatsos-Papakostas, Georgios Paraskevopoulos, Pantelis Kaplanoglou, Konstantinos Christantonis,CharalamposTsioustas,DimitrisMastrogiannopoulos,DepyPanga,EvitaFotinea,AthanasiosKatsama- nis, et al. 2022. Towards a DHH accessible theater: real-time synchronization of subtitles and sign language videos with ASR and NLP solutions....

    2022

  6. [6]

    Johnna Blair and Saeed Abdullah. 2019. Understanding the needs and challenges of using conversational agents for deaf older adults. InCompanion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 161–165

    2019

  7. [7]

    Keyword Extraction for Improved Document Retrieval in Conversational Search

    OlegBorisov,MohammadAliannejadi,andFabioCrestani.2021. Keywordextractionforimproveddocumentretrieval in conversational search.arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.05979 (2021)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Lauren Buck, Gareth W Young, and Rachel McDonnell. 2023. Avatar Customization, Personality, and the Perception of Work Group Inclusion in Immersive Virtual Reality. InCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 27–32

    2023

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    Janine Butler. 2019. Perspectives of deaf and hard of hearing viewers of captions.American Annals of the Deaf 163, 5 (2019), 534–553

    2019

  2. [10]

    Beiyan Cao, Changyang He, Muzhi Zhou, and Mingming Fan. 2023. Sparkling silence: Practices and challenges of livestreaming among deaf or hard of hearing streamers. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15

    2023

  3. [11]

    Jiaxun Cao, Xuening Peng, Fan Liang, and Xin Tong. 2024. ” Voices Help Correlate Signs and Words”: Analyzing Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing (DHH) TikTokersnContent, Practices, and Pitfalls. InProceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18

    2024

  4. [12]

    Monica S Castelhano and Paul Muter. 2001. Optimizing the reading of electronic text using rapid serial visual presen- tation. Behaviour & Information Technology 20, 4 (2001), 237–247

    2001

  5. [13]

    Shobhana Chandra, Sanjeev Verma, Weng Marc Lim, Satish Kumar, and Naveen Donthu. 2022. Personalization in personalized marketing: Trends and ways forward.Psychology & Marketing 39, 8 (2022), 1529–1562

    2022

  6. [14]

    Chia-Chen Chen and Jun-You Yao. 2018. What drives impulse buying behaviors in a mobile auction? The perspective of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model.Telematics and Informatics 35, 5 (2018), 1249–1262

    2018

  7. [15]

    Si Chen, Haocong Cheng, Jason Situ, Desirée Kirst, Suzy Su, Saumya Malhotra, Lawrence Angrave, Qi Wang, and Yun Huang. 2024. Towards Inclusive Video Commenting: Introducing Signmaku for the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Comp...

    2024

  8. [16]

    Yu-ChenChen,Rong-AnShang,andChen-YuKao.2009. Theeffectsofinformationoverloadonconsumers nsubjective state towards buying decision in the internet shopping environment.Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 8, 1 (2009), 48–58

    2009

  9. [17]

    LLM-assistedcontentanalysis: Using large language models to support deductive coding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14924 (2023)

    RobertChew,JohnBollenbacher,MichaelWenger,JessicaSpeer,andAnniceKim.2023. LLM-assistedcontentanalysis: Using large language models to support deductive coding.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.14924 (2023). Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 9, No. 7, Article 290. Publication date...

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Oscar De Bruijn, Robert Spence, and Min Yih Chong. 2002. RSVP browser: Web browsing on small screen devices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6 (2002), 245–252

    2002

  11. [19]

    Martin J Eppler and Jeanne Mengis. 2008. The Concept of Information Overload-A Review of Literature from Organi- zationScience,Accounting,Marketing,MIS,andRelatedDisciplines(2004)TheInformationSociety:AnInternational Journal, 20 (5), 2004, pp. 1–20.Kommunikationsmanagement im ...

    2008

  12. [20]

    Alet C Erasmus, Elizabeth Boshoff, and Gabriel G Rousseau. 2001. Consumer decision-making models within the discipline of consumer science: a critical approach.Journal of Consumer Sciences 29 (2001)

    2001

  13. [21]

    Sevgin A Eroglu, Karen A Machleit, and Lenita M Davis. 2001. Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications.Journal of Business research 54, 2 (2001), 177–184

    2001

  14. [22]

    Uzma Farooq, Mohd Shafry Mohd Rahim, Nabeel Sabir, Amir Hussain, and Adnan Abid. 2021. Advances in machine translation for sign language: approaches, limitations, and challenges. Neural Computing and Applications 33, 21 (2021), 14357–14399

    2021

  15. [23]

    Natália Fernandes, Antonio José Melo Leite Junior, Edgar Marçal, and Windson Viana. 2023. Augmented reality in educationforpeoplewhoaredeaforhardofhearing:asystematicliteraturereview. Universal Access in the Information Society (2023), 1–20

    2023

  16. [24]

    Leah Findlater, Bonnie Chinh, Dhruv Jain, Jon Froehlich, Raja Kushalnagar, and Angela Carey Lin. 2019. Deaf and hard-of-hearingindividuals’ preferences for wearable and mobile sound awareness technologies. InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing ...

    2019

  17. [25]

    Kenneth I Forster. 1970. Visual perception of rapidly presented word sequences of varying complexity.Perception & psychophysics 8 (1970), 215–221

    1970

  18. [26]

    Speedofprocessingvisualstimulianditsrelationtoreading

    LutherCGilbert.1959. Speedofprocessingvisualstimulianditsrelationtoreading. Journal of Educational Psychology 50, 1 (1959), 8

    1959

  19. [27]

    Abraham Glasser, Joseline Garcia, Chang Hwang, Christian Vogler, and Raja Kushalnagar. 2021. Effect of caption width on the TV user experience by deaf and hard of hearing viewers. InProceedings of the 18th International Web for All Conference. 1–5

    2021

  20. [28]

    Abraham Glasser, Vaishnavi Mande, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2020. Accessibility for deaf and hard of hearing users: Sign language conversational user interfaces. InProceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces . 1–3

    2020

  21. [29]

    ColeGleason,PatrickCarrington,LydiaBChilton,BenjaminMGorman,HernisaKacorri,AndrésMonroy-Hernández, Meredith Ringel Morris, Garreth W Tigwell, and Shaomei Wu. 2019. Addressing the accessibility of social media. In Companion Publication of the 2019 Conference on Computer Support...

    2019

  22. [30]

    Jan Gugenheimer, Katrin Plaumann, Florian Schaub, Patrizia Di Campli San Vito, Saskia Duck, Melanie Rabus, and Enrico Rukzio. 2017. The impact of assistive technology on communication quality between deaf and hearing indi- viduals. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on ...

    2017

  23. [31]

    Amin Ul Haq, Jian Ping Li, Muhammad Hammad Memon, Shah Nazir, and Ruinan Sun. 2018. A hybrid intelligent system framework for the prediction of heart disease using machine learning algorithms.Mobile information systems 2018, 1 (2018), 3860146

    2018

  24. [32]

    Tatsuya Honda, Tetsuaki Baba, and Makoto Okamoto. 2022. Ontenna: Design and social implementation of auditory information transmission devices using tactile and visual senses. InInternational Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, 130–138

    2022

  25. [33]

    Thepoweroflive-streaminginconsumers n purchasing decision

    MdAlamgirHossain,AbulKalam,MdNuruzzaman,andMinhoKim.2023. Thepoweroflive-streaminginconsumers n purchasing decision. SAGE Open 13, 4 (2023), 21582440231197903

    2023

  26. [34]

    Yue Huang and Lu Suo. 2021. Factors affecting Chinese consumersnimpulse buying decision of live streaming E- commerce. Asian Social Science 17, 5 (2021), 16

    2021

  27. [35]

    Matt Huenerfauth and Vicki Hanson. 2009. Sign language in the interface: access for deaf signers.Universal Access Handbook. NJ: Erlbaum 38 (2009), 14

    2009

  28. [36]

    Andri Ioannou and Vaso Constantinou. 2018. Augmented reality supporting deaf students in mainstream schools: Two case studies of practical utility of the technology. InInteractive Mobile Communication Technologies and Learning: Proceedings of the 11th IMCL Conference . Springe...

    2018

  29. [37]

    Dhruv Jain, Leah Findlater, Jamie Gilkeson, Benjamin Holland, Ramani Duraiswami, Dmitry Zotkin, Christian Vogler, and Jon E Froehlich. 2015. Head-mounted display visualizations to support sound awareness for the deaf and hard of hearing. InProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Co...

    2015

  30. [38]

    Porter, Chris Yoon, Swetha Machanavajhala, and Mered- ith Ringel Morris

    Dhruv Jain, Sasa Junuzovic, Eyal Ofek, Mike Sinclair, John R. Porter, Chris Yoon, Swetha Machanavajhala, and Mered- ith Ringel Morris. 2021. Towards sound accessibility in virtual reality. InProceedings of the 2021 International Confer- ence on Multimodal Interaction. 80–91

    2021

  31. [39]

    Bing-Hwang Juang and Sadaoki Furui. 2000. Automatic recognition and understanding of spoken language-a first step toward natural human-machine communication.Proc. IEEE 88, 8 (2000), 1142–1165

    2000

  32. [40]

    Saba Kawas, George Karalis, Tzu Wen, and Richard E Ladner. 2016. Improving real-time captioning experiences for deaf and hard of hearing students. InProceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 15–23

    2016

  33. [41]

    Muiz Ahmed Khan, Pias Paul, Mahmudur Rashid, Mainul Hossain, and Md Atiqur Rahman Ahad. 2020. An AI-based visual aid with integrated reading assistant for the completely blind.IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 50, 6 (2020), 507–517

    2020

  34. [42]

    Yeon Soo Kim, Sunok Lee, and Sangsu Lee. 2022. A Participatory Design Approach to Explore Design Directions for Enhancing Videoconferencing Experience for Non-signing Deaf and Hard of Hearing Users. InProceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers ...

    2022

  35. [43]

    Jonathan Kua, Grenville Armitage, and Philip Branch. 2017. A survey of rate adaptation techniques for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP.IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19, 3 (2017), 1842–1866

    2017

  36. [44]

    Trackedspeech-to-textdisplay:Enhanc- ing accessibility and readability of real-time speech-to-text

    RajaSKushalnagar,GaryWBehm,AaronWKelstone,andShareefAli.2015. Trackedspeech-to-textdisplay:Enhanc- ing accessibility and readability of real-time speech-to-text. InProceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. 223–230

    2015

  37. [45]

    Chao-Hsing Lee and Chien-Wen Chen. 2021. Impulse buying behaviors in live streaming commerce based on the stimulus-organism-response framework. Information 12, 6 (2021), 241

    2021

  38. [46]

    Mingwei Li, Qingjin Wang, and Ying Cao. 2022. Understanding consumer online impulse buying in live streaming e-commerce: A stimulus-organism-response framework. International journal of environmental research and public health 19, 7 (2022), 4378

    2022

  39. [47]

    oEvenWhenSuccess Seems Impossible, I Keep Streamingp: How Do Chinese Elderly Streamers Interact with Platform Algorithmic (In) visibility

    JunxiangLiao,ZhengWei,ZeyuYang,XianXu,PanHui,ChangyangHe,andMuzhiZhou.2025. oEvenWhenSuccess Seems Impossible, I Keep Streamingp: How Do Chinese Elderly Streamers Interact with Platform Algorithmic (In) visibility. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in C...

    2025

  40. [48]

    Mechanismofinteractionandentertainmentimpactonimpulsepurchase intention in shopping livestream

    WeiweiLu,YiwenChen,andShangLi.2022. Mechanismofinteractionandentertainmentimpactonimpulsepurchase intention in shopping livestream. InProceedings of the 6th International Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business and E- Government. 59–63

    2022

  41. [49]

    Le Luo, Dongdong Weng, Guo Songrui, Jie Hao, and Ziqi Tu. 2022. Avatar interpreter: improving classroom expe- riences for deaf and hard-of-hearing people based on augmented reality. InCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1–5

    2022

  42. [50]

    Emma J McDonnell, Ping Liu, Steven M Goodman, Raja Kushalnagar, Jon E Froehlich, and Leah Findlater. 2021. So- cial, environmental, and technical: Factors at play in the current use and future design of small-group captioning. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interacti...

    2021

  43. [51]

    Patrick E McKnight and Julius Najab. 2010. Mann-Whitney U Test.The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology (2010), 1–1

    2010

  44. [52]

    Meinzen-Derr

    J. Meinzen-Derr. 2023. Tech-Based Intervention Dramatically Improved Language Skills in Hearing Impaired Kids. https://www.physiciansweekly.com/tech-based-intervention-dramatically-improved-language-skills-in- hearing-impaired-kids/

    2023

  45. [53]

    Mohammadreza Mirzaei, Peter Kan, and Hannes Kaufmann. 2020. EarVR: Using ear haptics in virtual reality for deaf and Hard-of-Hearing people.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 26, 5 (2020), 2084–2093

    2020

  46. [54]

    Meredith Ringel Morris, Kori Inkpen, and Gina Venolia. 2014. Remote shopping advice: enhancing in-store shopping with social technologies. InProceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 662–673

    2014

  47. [55]

    Surge News. 2024. China Live Streaming E-Commerce Industry Research Report 2023.https://www.thepaper.cn/ newsDetail_forward_26518751

    2024

  48. [56]

    Yi-Hao Peng, Ming-Wei Hsi, Paul Taele, Ting-Yu Lin, Po-En Lai, Leon Hsu, Tzu-chuan Chen, Te-Yen Wu, Yu-An Chen, Hsien-Hui Tang, et al. 2018. Speechbubbles: Enhancing captioning experiences for deaf and hard-of-hearing people in group conversations. InProceedings of the 2018 CH...

    2018

  49. [57]

    Michael V Perrotta, Thorhildur Asgeirsdottir, and David M Eagleman. 2021. Deciphering sounds through patterns of vibration on the skin.Neuroscience 458 (2021), 77–86

    2021

  50. [58]

    Anne Marie Piper and James D Hollan. 2008. Supporting medical conversations between deaf and hearing individuals with tabletop displays. InProceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work . 147–156

    2008

  51. [59]

    Todd Andrew Ricketts. 2001. Directional hearing aids.Trends in Amplification 5, 4 (2001), 139–176

    2001

  52. [60]

    AugmentedReality(AR)forDeafandHardofHearing(DHH) for animation

    MohamadSaifuddinRusliandZainuddinIbrahim.2022. AugmentedReality(AR)forDeafandHardofHearing(DHH) for animation. e-Academia Journal 11, 2 (2022), 175–186. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 9, No. 7, Article 290. Publication date: November 2025. EchoAid: Enhancing Livestream...

    2022

  53. [61]

    Rufat Rzayev, Paweł W Woźniak, Tilman Dingler, and Niels Henze. 2018. Reading on smart glasses: The effect of text position, presentation type and walking. InProceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–9

    2018

  54. [62]

    Yasith Samaradivakara, Thavindu Ushan, Asela Pathirage, Prasanth Sasikumar, Kasun Karunanayaka, Chamath Kep- pitiyagama, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2024. SeEar: Tailoring Real-time AR Caption Interfaces for Deaf and Hard-of- Hearing (DHH) Students in Specialized Educational Sett...

    2024

  55. [63]

    Maxime E Sanders, Ellen Kant, Adriana L Smit, and Inge Stegeman. 2021. The effect of hearing aids on cognitive function: a systematic review.PLoS One 16, 12 (2021), e0261207

    2021

  56. [64]

    Matthew Seita, Sooyeon Lee, Sarah Andrew, Kristen Shinohara, and Matt Huenerfauth. 2022. Remotely co-designing features for communication applications using automatic captioning with deaf and hearing pairs. InProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing...

    2022

  57. [65]

    Ellyn G Sheffield, Michael Starling, and Daniel Schwab. 2011. Bringing text display digital radio to consumers with hearing loss. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education 16, 4 (2011), 537–552

    2011

  58. [66]

    2021.China livestreaming e-commerce industry insights

    Ruo Si. 2021.China livestreaming e-commerce industry insights. Springer

    2021

  59. [67]

    Ruo Si and Ruo Si. 2021. The Evolvement of Livestreaming E-Commerce.China Livestreaming E-commerce Industry Insights (2021), 1–31

    2021

  60. [68]

    Preeti Srinivasan. 2020. ” Am I Overwhelmed with this Information?” A Cross-Platform Study on Information Over- load, Technostress, Well-Being, and Continued Social Media Usage Intentions. InCompanion Publication of the 2020 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work an...

    2020

  61. [69]

    Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research techniques. (1998)

    1998

  62. [70]

    Daretodream,daretolivestream:Howe-commercelivestream- ing empowers chinese rural women

    NingjingTang,LeiTao,BoWen,andZhicongLu.2022. Daretodream,daretolivestream:Howe-commercelivestream- ing empowers chinese rural women. InProceedings of the 2022 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 1–13

    2022

  63. [71]

    Renu Thakur, Jaikishan Jayakumar, and Sangeeta Pant. 2019. A comparative study of visual attention in hearing impaired and normal schoolgoing children.Indian Journal of Otology 25, 4 (2019), 192–195

    2019

  64. [72]

    Renu Thakur, Jaikishan Jayakumar, and Sangeeta Pant. 2023. Visual Perception and Attentional Skills in School-age Children: A Cross-Sectional Study of Reading Proficiency in the Hearing Impaired.Indian Journal of Community Medicine 48, 4 (2023), 544–549

    2023

  65. [73]

    2011.Spoken language understanding: Systems for extracting semantic information from speech

    Gokhan Tur and Renato De Mori. 2011.Spoken language understanding: Systems for extracting semantic information from speech. John Wiley & Sons

    2011

  66. [74]

    Ye Wang, Zhicong Lu, Peng Cao, Jingyi Chu, Haonan Wang, and Roger Wattenhofer. 2022. How live streaming changes shopping decisions in E-commerce: A study of live streaming commerce.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 31, 4 (2022), 701–729

    2022

  67. [75]

    Diana Teresia Spits Warnars, Leonardo Primadala Putra, Harco Leslie Hendric Spits Warnars, Wiranto Herry Utomo, et al. 2019. Intelligent E-commerce for Special Needs. In2019 7th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), Vol. 7. IEEE, 1–5

    2019

  68. [76]

    Zheng Wei, Yuzheng Chen, Wai Tong, Xuan Zong, Huamin Qu, Xian Xu, and Lik-Hang Lee. 2024. Hearing the Moment with MetaEcho! From Physical to Virtual in Synchronized Sound Recording. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 6520–6529

    2024

  69. [77]

    2025.oI Cannt Even Recall What I Boughtp: How Design Influences Impulsive Buying in Douyin Live Sales.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction (2025), 1–18

    Zheng Wei, Lik-Hang Lee, Wai Tong, Xian Xu, Chaozhe Zhang, Huamin Qu, and Pan Hui. 2025.oI Cannt Even Recall What I Boughtp: How Design Influences Impulsive Buying in Douyin Live Sales.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction (2025), 1–18

    2025

  70. [78]

    Zheng Wei, Junxiang Liao, Lik-Hang Lee, Huamin Qu, and Xian Xu. 2025. Towards Enhanced Learning through Pres- ence:ASystematicReviewofPresenceinVirtualRealityAcrossTasksandDisciplines. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13845 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Zheng Wei, Jia Sun, Junxiang Liao, Lik-Hang Lee, Chan In Sio, Pan Hui, Huamin Qu, Wai Tong, and Xian Xu. 2025. Illuminating the scene: How virtual environments and learning modes shape film lighting mastery in virtual reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Gr...

    2025

  72. [80]

    Zheng Wei, Xian Xu, Lik-Hang Lee, Wai Tong, Huamin Qu, and Pan Hui. 2023. Feeling Present! From Physical to VirtualCinematographyLightingEducationwithMetashadow.In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1127–1136

    2023

  73. [81]

    InclusiveAR-gamesforeducation of deaf children: Challenges and opportunities

    ThomasWestin,JoséNeves,PeterMozelius,CarlaSousa,andLaraMantovan.2022. InclusiveAR-gamesforeducation of deaf children: Challenges and opportunities. InEuropean Conference on Games Based Learning , Vol. 16. 597–604

    2022

  74. [82]

    Sumas Wongsunopparat and Binmei Deng. 2021. Factors influencing purchase decision of Chinese consumer under live streaming E-commerce model.Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship 9, 2 (2021), 1–15. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 9, No. 7, Article 290. Publicati...

    2021

  75. [83]

    Qunfang Wu, Yisi Sang, Dakuo Wang, and Zhicong Lu. 2023. Malicious selling strategies in livestream E-commerce: A case study of alibabans taobao and ByteDancens TikTok. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 30, 3 (2023), 1–29

    2023

  76. [84]

    Xian Xu, Wai Tong, Zheng Wei, Meng Xia, Lik-Hang Lee, and Huamin Qu. 2023. Cinematography in the metaverse: Exploring the lighting education on a soundstage. In2023 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3d user interfaces abstracts and workshops (VRW). IEEE, 571–572

    2023

  77. [85]

    Xian Xu, Wai Tong, Zheng Wei, Meng Xia, Lik-Hang Lee, and Huamin Qu. 2024. Transforming cinematography lighting education in the metaverse.Visual Informatics (2024)

    2024

  78. [86]

    2022.Holographic Sign Language Interpreter: A User Interaction Study within Mixed Reality Classroom

    Fu-Chia Yang. 2022.Holographic Sign Language Interpreter: A User Interaction Study within Mixed Reality Classroom . Master’s thesis. Purdue University

    2022

  79. [87]

    Chongjae Yoo and Hwanhee Lee. 2023. Improving Abstractive Dialogue Summarization Using Keyword Extraction. Applied Sciences 13, 17 (2023), 9771

    2023

  80. [88]

    Jeewoo Yun, Don Lee, Michael Cottingham, and Hyowon Hyun. 2023. New generation commerce: The rise of live commerce (L-commerce). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 74 (2023), 103394. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 9, No. 7, Article 290. Publication date: Novemb...

    2023

  81. [89]

    It contains up to 10 items sorted in ascending time order, with each item spaced 30 seconds apart

    Your input is summarized text converted from the host’s speech. It contains up to 10 items sorted in ascending time order, with each item spaced 30 seconds apart

  82. [90]

    Your task is to extract keywords and output in the following format (use ‘null‘ for unspecified fields): Product: … Category: … Promotional Policy: … Free Shipping: … 7-Day No Reason Return: … Price: … After-Sales Service: … Product Description: … User Experience: … User Manua...

  83. [91]

    You need to analyze the context carefully to understand the host’s message

    Transcription may contain repetitions, omissions, or recognition errors, especially near the last 10 seconds of text due to incomplete corrections by the speech model. You need to analyze the context carefully to understand the host’s message

  84. [92]

    Ignore irrelevant details such as stories, filler words, or casual dialogue

    Extract the most critical information. Ignore irrelevant details such as stories, filler words, or casual dialogue

  85. [93]

    If there is useful information, condense it from the host’s perspective

  86. [94]

    7.Remembertoprovidetherequiredoutputwithoutenclosingitin“ ```“.Failuretocomplywill result in termination

    Use concise, impactful sentences with only the most essential information. 7.Remembertoprovidetherequiredoutputwithoutenclosingitin“ ```“.Failuretocomplywill result in termination. It is unable to resolve. Start processing. A.3 Live Streaming Platform Experience Questionnaire ...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.