Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 76 references

Exploring Disentangled Neural Speech Codecs from Self-Supervised Representations

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A discrete neural audio codec built on k-means quantized self-supervised features claims to match standard codecs in reconstruction while matching voice-conversion systems in disentanglement.

desk verdict The abstract describes a plausible speech codec idea, but the full text is an unrelated neuroscience paper, so the submission is unverifiable and should be returned, not reviewed. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.08399 v1 pith:4SPWKTLZ submitted 2025-08-11 eess.AS eess.SP

Ryo Aihara , Yoshiki Masuyama , Gordon Wichern , François G. Germain , Jonathan Le Roux This is my paper
classification eess.ASeess.SP
keywords neuralaudiocodecdisentangledrepresentationself-supervisedspeechfeaturesk-meansquantizationvoiceconversiondiscretetokensstructureddisentanglement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to build a discrete neural audio codec whose codes separate what is said from how it is said, so the same representation can serve high-quality compression and voice conversion. It borrows the k-means quantization trick that voice-conversion methods use on self-supervised speech features to isolate phonetic content. The abstract reports that this structured-disentanglement codec reconstructs speech on par with conventional codecs that do not attempt disentanglement, and converts voices on par with conventional VC techniques. The central assertion is that explicit, structured disentanglement need not cost reconstruction fidelity. Note: the full text supplied is a different manuscript (a field-theoretic study of compartmental neuronal networks), so this summary rests on the abstract alone.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is k-means quantization applied to self-supervised speech representations, lifted from voice-conversion practice into a fully trained neural audio codec. The cluster assignments yield discrete tokens that are meant to encode phonetic information, while the rest of the network handles the paralinguistic and acoustic details needed for reconstruction. This combination is what carries both the disentanglement and the compression claims.

What would settle it

Train a speaker classifier on the content-code sequences produced by the codec; if speaker identity is recovered far above chance, the claimed disentanglement is incomplete. Alternatively, on a standard benchmark (e.g., LibriTTS or VCTK), if the codec's reconstruction metrics (PESQ or SI-SDR) fall clearly below those of a conventional codec at the same bitrate, the reconstruction-parity claim is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims to develop a discrete neural audio codec with structured disentanglement: the quantization stage maps self-supervised speech features to discrete codes in a way that separates phonetic content from paralinguistic attributes such as speaker identity. Trained end-to-end, this codec achieves reconstruction performance comparable to neural audio codecs that make no disentanglement effort, while also matching the voice-conversion effectiveness of dedicated VC methods. The discovery is that content-speaker separation can be built into a codec's discrete tokens without sacrificing either compression quality or the ability to resynthesize speech.

Load-bearing premise

The approach depends on k-means clusters of self-supervised speech features cleanly separating phonetic content from speaker traits, a premise that cannot be checked here because the supplied full text is a different paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single discrete token stream could serve both speech compression and speaker-controlled generation, making speech language models that operate on tokens able to manipulate speaker identity without additional modules.
  • Reconstruction parity with conventional NACs would mean there is no rate-distortion penalty for choosing a codec that also enables voice conversion.
  • The same codec could be used directly in token-based speech editing, where content tokens and speaker tokens are changed independently.
  • The approach could generalize to other paralinguistic attributes—emotion, prosody, style—if those are also separated in the discrete codes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If self-supervised features from a multilingual model are used, the same method might yield codes that separate language identity as well as speaker identity, enabling cross-lingual voice conversion from one token stream.
  • A natural extension is to measure residual speaker information in the content codes by training a speaker classifier on them; if the codec truly disentangles, classification should be near chance.
  • The k-means step may leave a noise floor of speaker information that end-to-end training could sharpen; combining it with an explicit information bottleneck could make the disentanglement more exact than what the abstract alone promises.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submitted manuscript purports to present a discrete neural audio codec with structured disentanglement, built by k-means quantization of self-supervised speech features, and claims reconstruction parity with conventional neural audio codecs (NACs) while matching the effectiveness of conventional voice conversion (VC) techniques. The abstract states that experimental evaluations support these claims. However, the supplied full text is arXiv:2508.08405v1, "Field-theoretic approach to compartmental neuronal networks: impact of dendritic calcium spike-dependent bursting," a neuroscience paper with no connection to speech coding, self-supervised representations, voice conversion, or audio experiments. No architecture, equations, training procedure, dataset, baselines, evaluation protocol, or quantitative result for the proposed codec appears anywhere in the manuscript. The claims are therefore entirely unsupported by the submitted document.

Significance. If the claimed result were established, it would be a meaningful empirical contribution: showing that a discrete codec built from self-supervised features can achieve structured disentanglement without sacrificing reconstruction fidelity, and that the same discrete codes support voice conversion, would be relevant to audio coding, self-supervised speech representation learning, and voice conversion. The motivating idea is plausible and testable. However, because the manuscript contains none of the technical apparatus for the claimed experiments, its significance cannot be assessed from the submitted text. There are no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, parameter-free derivations, or falsifiable predictions in the submission to credit. The only evaluable content is the abstract, which is not sufficient to validate the central claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full Text] The entire technical body of the submission is an unrelated preprint, arXiv:2508.08405v1 (Teasley and Ocker, 'Field-theoretic approach to compartmental neuronal networks...'). This is not a missing appendix or a local formatting error; the complete text concerns neuronal population dynamics and contains no mention of neural audio codecs, k-means quantization, self-supervised speech features, voice conversion, or any audio experiments. As a result, the manuscript provides no evidence whatsoever for the claimed codec method or its experimental evaluation. This is a decisive verifiability failure that blocks any assessment of soundness. Treating all manuscript text as in-scope evidence makes this mismatch the central fact of the submission.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract's load-bearing assertion—'our approach achieves reconstruction performance on par with conventional NACs ... while also matching the effectiveness of conventional VC techniques'—is unsupported by any reported experiments. There are no datasets, baselines, objective or subjective metrics, confidence intervals, or ablations. In particular, the proposed mechanism ('k-means quantization with self-supervised features to disentangle phonetic information') cannot be checked for the risk that end-to-end codec training re-entangles the codes, nor can one verify whether the evaluation metrics are entangled with the same self-supervised features used to construct the codes. Because the body is unrelated, the abstract's claims are unverifiable rather than merely under-reported.
  3. [Full Text / Methodology (absent)] The central premise—that k-means clusters of self-supervised speech features isolate phonetic content cleanly enough to yield a disentangled discrete codec after end-to-end training—is plausible but entirely untested in this submission. No implementation, training loss, codebook construction, or disentanglement evaluation is provided. This is not a minor omission: it is the core mechanism on which both the reconstruction-parity and VC-effectiveness claims depend. The submission offers no way to evaluate whether cluster boundaries align with phonetic units or whether codec training re-entangles the codes.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'structured disentanglement' is used without definition. If the correct manuscript is provided, please define what structure is being disentangled (e.g., separate codes for phonetic content and speaker characteristics) and specify how this is measured.
  2. [Metadata] The arXiv ID and subject class displayed in the full text (2508.08405v1, q-bio.NC) do not match the claimed submission (2508.08399, eess.AS). Please ensure the uploaded PDF corresponds to the abstract and that all metadata are consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity assessable: manuscript body is an unrelated neuroscience paper, so the speech-codec claims have no derivation chain to inspect.

full rationale

The supplied manuscript consists of an abstract for arXiv:2508.08399 (a discrete neural audio codec paper) followed by the full text of a different paper, arXiv:2508.08405v1, on field-theoretic compartmental neuronal networks. None of the claimed codec architecture, k-means quantization details, self-supervised representation, training objective, reconstruction evaluation, or VC baselines appears in the body. Circularity analysis requires exhibiting a specific reduction: e.g., Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No such reduction can be exhibited because the derivation chain of the codec claims is entirely absent. The mismatch is a serious verifiability failure and a correctness risk, but it is not an instance of circular reasoning under the stated evidence rule. The neuroscience full text is self-contained relative to its own mean-field derivation, and no self-citation load-bearing step relevant to the claimed abstract can be evaluated. Therefore the honest finding is no assessable circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters can be audited because the abstract provides no modeling details; a real implementation would have at least a k-means codebook size and a vector quantization dimension as free choices. The axioms listed are the domain assumptions carried by the abstract's 'inspired by VC methods' framing, and all are unverified here due to the mismatch between the abstract and the provided full text.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Self-supervised speech representations contain separable phonetic and speaker information.
    The abstract assumes that the chosen self-supervised features, when quantized by k-means, yield codes that represent phonetic content independently of speaker identity. This is the core modeling bet and is stated only via the phrase 'to disentangle phonetic information.'
  • domain assumption k-means quantization preserves the desired phonetic content with acceptable fidelity.
    The approach relies on k-means cluster assignments as target codes for the neural codec. If quantization destroys fine phonetic detail or mixes speaker information into cluster identity, the disentanglement claim fails. This is an implicit assumption from the abstract's methodology sketch.
  • domain assumption Training a neural codec to reconstruct from these quantized codes yields a representation that retains the code's disentanglement.
    The abstract claims the resulting discrete NAC is disentangled, which presupposes that end-to-end codec training does not re-entangle the codes. No evidence is shown in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring Disentangled Neural Speech Codecs from Self-Supervised Representations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4SPWKTLZ

@misc{pith2026250808399,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring Disentangled Neural Speech Codecs from Self-Supervised Representations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4SPWKTLZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.08399}
}
abstract

Neural audio codecs (NACs), which use neural networks to generate compact audio representations, have garnered interest for their applicability to many downstream tasks -- especially quantized codecs due to their compatibility with large language models. However, unlike text, speech conveys not only linguistic content but also rich paralinguistic features. Encoding these elements in an entangled fashion may be suboptimal, as it limits flexibility. For instance, voice conversion (VC) aims to convert speaker characteristics while preserving the original linguistic content, which requires a disentangled representation. Inspired by VC methods utilizing $k$-means quantization with self-supervised features to disentangle phonetic information, we develop a discrete NAC capable of structured disentanglement. Experimental evaluations show that our approach achieves reconstruction performance on par with conventional NACs that do not explicitly perform disentanglement, while also matching the effectiveness of conventional VC techniques.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Coombes, Large-scale neural dynamics: Simple and complex, NeuroImage Computational Models of the Brain, 52, 731 (2010)

    S. Coombes, Large-scale neural dynamics: Simple and complex, NeuroImage Computational Models of the Brain, 52, 731 (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    J. C. Eccles, The action potential of the superior cervical ganglion, The Journal of Physiology 85, 179 (1935)

    work page 1935

  3. [3]

    A. L. Hodgkin and A. F. Huxley, A quantitative descrip- tion of membrane current and its application to conduc- tion and excitation in nerve, The Journal of Physiology 117, 500 (1952)

    1952

  4. [4]

    M. E. Larkum, J. Wu, S. A. Duverdin, and A. Gidon, The Guide to Dendritic Spikes of the Mammalian Cortex In Vitro and In Vivo, Neuroscience Dendritic Contribu- tions to Biological and Artificial Computations, 489, 15 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    M. E. Larkum, J. J. Zhu, and B. Sakmann, A new cel- lular mechanism for coupling inputs arriving at different cortical layers, Nature 398, 338 (1999)

    work page 1999

  6. [6]

    Naud and H

    R. Naud and H. Sprekeler, Sparse bursts optimize infor- mation transmission in a multiplexed neural code, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 201720995 (2018)

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Friedenberger, E

    Z. Friedenberger, E. Harkin, K. T´ oth, and R. Naud, Si- lences, spikes and bursts: Three-part knot of the neural code, The Journal of Physiology 601, 5165 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    J. C. Brumberg, L. G. Nowak, and D. A. McCormick, Ionic mechanisms underlying repetitive high-frequency burst firing in supragranular cortical neurons, The Jour- nal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 20, 4829 (2000)

    work page 2000

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    P. A. Schwartzkroin and M. Slawsky, Probable calcium spikes in hippocampal neurons, Brain Research 135, 157 (1977)

    1977

  2. [10]

    R. K. Wong, D. A. Prince, and A. I. Basbaum, Intraden- dritic recordings from hippocampal neurons., Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences 76, 986 (1979)

    1979

  3. [11]

    J. C. Magee and M. Carruth, Dendritic voltage-gated ion channels regulate the action potential firing mode of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons, Journal of Neuro- physiology 82, 1895 (1999)

    1999

  4. [12]

    M. E. Larkum, J. Waters, B. Sakmann, and F. Helm- chen, Dendritic Spikes in Apical Dendrites of Neocortical Layer 2/3 Pyramidal Neurons, Journal of Neuroscience 27, 8999 (2007)

    2007

  5. [13]

    Jahnsen and R

    H. Jahnsen and R. Llin´ as, Ionic basis for the electro- responsiveness and oscillatory properties of guinea-pig thalamic neurones in vitro., The Journal of Physiology 349, 227 (1984)

    1984

  6. [14]

    Destexhe, M

    A. Destexhe, M. Neubig, D. Ulrich, and J. Huguenard, Dendritic Low-Threshold Calcium Currents in Thalamic Relay Cells, Journal of Neuroscience 18, 3574 (1998)

    1998

  7. [15]

    J. C. Eccles, R. Llin´ as, and K. Sasaki, The excitatory synaptic action of climbing fibres on the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum, The Journal of Physiology 182, 268 (1966)

    1966

  8. [16]

    J. T. Davie, B. A. Clark, and M. H¨ ausser, The Origin of the Complex Spike in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells, The Journal of Neuroscience 28, 7599 (2008)

    2008

  9. [17]

    D. J. Felleman and D. C. Van Essen, Distributed hierar- chical processing in the primate cerebral cortex, Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991) 1, 1 (1991 Jan-Feb)

    1991

  10. [18]

    J. A. Harris, S. Mihalas, K. E. Hirokawa, J. D. White- sell, H. Choi, A. Bernard, P. Bohn, S. Caldejon, L. Casal, A. Cho, A. Feiner, D. Feng, N. Gaudreault, C. R. Gerfen, N. Graddis, P. A. Groblewski, A. M. Henry, A. Ho, R. Howard, J. E. Knox, L. Kuan, X. Kuang, J. Lecoq, P. L...

    2019

  11. [19]

    B. Rudy, G. Fishell, S. Lee, and J. Hjerling-Leffler, Three groups of interneurons account for nearly 100% of neocor- tical GABAergic neurons, Developmental Neurobiology 71, 45 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    R. D. Traub, D. Contreras, M. O. Cunningham, H. Mur- ray, F. E. N. LeBeau, A. Roopun, A. Bibbig, W. B. Wilent, M. J. Higley, and M. A. Whittington, Single- Column Thalamocortical Network Model Exhibiting Gamma Oscillations, Sleep Spindles, and Epileptogenic Bursts, Journal of ...

    2005

  13. [21]

    Markram, The Blue Brain Project, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7, 153 (2006)

    H. Markram, The Blue Brain Project, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7, 153 (2006)

    2006

  14. [22]

    Markram, E

    H. Markram, E. Muller, S. Ramaswamy, M. W. Reimann, M. Abdellah, C. A. Sanchez, A. Ailamaki, L. Alonso- Nanclares, N. Antille, S. Arsever, G. A. A. Kahou, T. K. Berger, A. Bilgili, N. Buncic, A. Chalimourda, G. Chindemi, J.-D. Courcol, F. Delalondre, V. De- lattre, S. Druckman...

    2015

  15. [23]

    Y. N. Billeh, B. Cai, S. L. Gratiy, K. Dai, R. Iyer, N. W. Gouwens, R. Abbasi-Asl, X. Jia, J. H. Siegle, S. R. Olsen, C. Koch, S. Mihalas, and A. Arkhipov, Systematic Inte- gration of Structural and Functional Data into Multi- scale Models of Mouse Primary Visual Cortex, Neuro...

    2020

  16. [24]

    Grossberg, On learning and energy-entropy depen- dence in recurrent and nonrecurrent signed networks, Journal of Statistical Physics 1, 319 (1969)

    S. Grossberg, On learning and energy-entropy depen- dence in recurrent and nonrecurrent signed networks, Journal of Statistical Physics 1, 319 (1969)

    1969

  17. [25]

    Amari, Characteristics of randomly connected threshold-element networks and network systems, Pro- ceedings of the IEEE 59, 35 (1971)

    S.-I. Amari, Characteristics of randomly connected threshold-element networks and network systems, Pro- ceedings of the IEEE 59, 35 (1971)

    1971

  18. [26]

    Amari, Characteristics of Random Nets of Analog Neuron-Like Elements, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-2, 643 (1972)

    S.-I. Amari, Characteristics of Random Nets of Analog Neuron-Like Elements, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-2, 643 (1972)

    1972

  19. [27]

    H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan, Excitatory and Inhibitory 20 Interactions in Localized Populations of Model Neurons, Biophysical Journal 12, 1 (1972)

    1972

  20. [28]

    Sompolinsky, A

    H. Sompolinsky, A. Crisanti, and H. J. Sommers, Chaos in Random Neural Networks, Physical Review Letters 61, 259 (1988)

    1988

  21. [29]

    Ohira and J

    T. Ohira and J. D. Cowan, Master-equation approach to stochastic neurodynamics, Physical Review E 48, 2259 (1993)

    1993

  22. [30]

    Ginzburg and H

    I. Ginzburg and H. Sompolinsky, Theory of correlations in stochastic neural networks, Physical Review E 50, 3171 (1994)

    1994

  23. [31]

    van Vreeswijk and H

    C. van Vreeswijk and H. Sompolinsky, Chaotic Balanced State in a Model of Cortical Circuits, Neural Computa- tion 10, 1321 (1998)

    1998

  24. [32]

    Brunel, Dynamics of Sparsely Connected Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Spiking Neurons, Journal of Computational Neuroscience 8, 183 (2000)

    N. Brunel, Dynamics of Sparsely Connected Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Spiking Neurons, Journal of Computational Neuroscience 8, 183 (2000)

    2000

  25. [33]

    Gerstner, Time structure of the activity in neural network models, Physical Review E 51, 738 (1995)

    W. Gerstner, Time structure of the activity in neural network models, Physical Review E 51, 738 (1995)

    1995

  26. [34]

    Renart, J

    A. Renart, J. de la Rocha, P. Bartho, L. Hollender, N. Parga, A. Reyes, and K. D. Harris, The Asynchronous State in Cortical Circuits, Science 327, 587 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    Montbri´ o, D

    E. Montbri´ o, D. Paz´ o, and A. Roxin, Macroscopic De- scription for Networks of Spiking Neurons, Physical Re- view X 5, 021028 (2015)

    2015

  28. [36]

    Paliwal, G

    S. Paliwal, G. K. Ocker, and B. A. W. Brinkman, Metastability in networks of stochastic integrate-and-fire neurons, Physical Review E 111, 064402 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    C. C. Chow and M. A. Buice, Path Integral Methods for Stochastic Differential Equations, The Journal of Math- ematical Neuroscience (JMN) 5, 1 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    G. K. Ocker, Republished: Dynamics of Stochastic Integrate-and-Fire Networks, Physical Review X 13, 041047 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    M. A. Buice and J. D. Cowan, Field-theoretic approach to fluctuation effects in neural networks, Physical Review E 75, 051919 (2007)

    2007

  32. [40]

    M. A. Buice, J. D. Cowan, and C. C. Chow, System- atic Fluctuation Expansion for Neural Network Activity Equations, Neural Computation 22, 377 (2010)

    2010

  33. [41]

    G. K. Ocker, K. Josi´ c, E. Shea-Brown, and M. A. Buice, Linking structure and activity in nonlinear spiking networks, PLOS Computational Biology 13, e1005583 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    S. R. Williams and G. J. Stuart, Mechanisms and conse- quences of action potential burst firing in rat neocortical pyramidal neurons, The Journal of Physiology 521, 467 (1999)

    1999

  35. [43]

    M. E. Larkum, J. J. Zhu, and B. Sakmann, Dendritic mechanisms underlying the coupling of the dendritic with the axonal action potential initiation zone of adult rat layer 5 pyramidal neurons, The Journal of Physiology 533, 447 (2001)

    2001

  36. [44]

    Schwindt and W

    P. Schwindt and W. Crill, Mechanisms Underlying Burst and Regular Spiking Evoked by Dendritic Depolarization in Layer 5 Cortical Pyramidal Neurons, Journal of Neu- rophysiology 81, 1341 (1999)

    1999

  37. [45]

    H. G. Kim and B. W. Connors, Apical dendrites of the neocortex: Correlation between sodium- and calcium- dependent spiking and pyramidal cell morphology, Jour- nal of Neuroscience 13, 5301 (1993)

    1993

  38. [46]

    Zhu, Large deviations for Markovian nonlinear Hawkes processes, The Annals of Applied Probability 25, 548 (2015)

    L. Zhu, Large deviations for Markovian nonlinear Hawkes processes, The Annals of Applied Probability 25, 548 (2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    Delattre, N

    S. Delattre, N. Fournier, and M. Hoffmann, Hawkes pro- cesses on large networks, The Annals of Applied Proba- bility 26, 216 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Heesen and W

    S. Heesen and W. Stannat, Fluctuation limits for mean- field interacting nonlinear Hawkes processes, Stochastic Processes and their Applications 139, 280 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Pfaffelhuber, S

    P. Pfaffelhuber, S. Rotter, and J. Stiefel, Mean-field lim- its for non-linear Hawkes processes with excitation and inhibition, Stochastic Processes and their Applications 153, 57 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    K. C. Bittner, C. Grienberger, S. P. Vaidya, A. D. Mil- stein, J. J. Macklin, J. Suh, S. Tonegawa, and J. C. Magee, Conjunctive input processing drives feature selec- tivity in hippocampal CA1 neurons, Nature Neuroscience 18, 1133 (2015)

    2015

  43. [51]

    Cichon and W.-B

    J. Cichon and W.-B. Gan, Branch-specific dendritic Ca2+ spikes cause persistent synaptic plasticity, Nature 520, 180 (2015)

    2015

  44. [52]

    K. C. Bittner, A. D. Milstein, C. Grienberger, S. Romani, and J. C. Magee, Behavioral time scale synaptic plastic- ity underlies CA1 place fields, Science (New York, N.Y.) 357, 1033 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Statistical Dynamics of Classical Systems, Physical Review A8, 423 (1973)

    1973

  46. [54]

    C. D. Dominicis, TECHNIQUES DE RENORMALI- SATION DE LA TH ´EORIE DES CHAMPS ET DY- NAMIQUE DES PH ´ENOM`ENES CRITIQUES, Le Journal de Physique Colloques 37, C1 (1976)

    1976

  47. [55]

    Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynam- ics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Physik der Kondensierten Materie 23, 377 (1976)

    H.-K. Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynam- ics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Physik der Kondensierten Materie 23, 377 (1976)

    1976

  48. [56]

    R. V. Jensen, Functional integral approach to classical statistical dynamics, Journal of Statistical Physics 25, 183 (1981)

    1981

  49. [57]

    Schmutz, E

    V. Schmutz, E. L¨ ocherbach, and T. Schwalger, On a finite-size neuronal population equation, (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    G. V. Vinci, R. Benzi, and M. Mattia, Self-Consistent Stochastic Dynamics for Finite-Size Networks of Spiking Neurons, Physical Review Letters 130, 097402 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Fleurantin, K

    E. Fleurantin, K. Slyman, B. Barker, and C. K. R. T. Jones, A dynamical systems approach for most probable escape paths over periodic boundaries, Physica D: Non- linear Phenomena 454, 133860 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    M. V. Tsodyks, W. E. Skaggs, T. J. Sejnowski, and B. L. McNaughton, Paradoxical Effects of External Modula- tion of Inhibitory Interneurons, The Journal of Neuro- science 17, 4382 (1997)

    1997

  53. [61]

    Sanzeni, B

    A. Sanzeni, B. Akitake, H. C. Goldbach, C. E. Leedy, N. Brunel, and M. H. Histed, Inhibition stabilization is a widespread property of cortical networks, eLife 9, e54875 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    Litwin-Kumar, R

    A. Litwin-Kumar, R. Rosenbaum, and B. Doiron, In- hibitory stabilization and visual coding in cortical circuits with multiple interneuron subtypes, Journal of Neuro- physiology 115, 1399 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    L. M. Palmer, J. M. Schulz, S. C. Murphy, D. Lederg- erber, M. Murayama, and M. E. Larkum, The Cellular Basis of GABAB-Mediated Interhemispheric Inhibition, Science 335, 989 (2012)

    2012

  56. [64]

    E. Hay, S. Hill, F. Sch¨ urmann, H. Markram, and I. Segev, Models of Neocortical Layer 5b Pyramidal Cells Captur- 21 ing a Wide Range of Dendritic and Perisomatic Active Properties, PLOS Computational Biology 7, e1002107 (2011)

    2011

  57. [65]

    Markram, J

    H. Markram, J. L¨ ubke, M. Frotscher, A. Roth, and B. Sakmann, Physiology and anatomy of synaptic con- nections between thick tufted pyramidal neurones in the developing rat neocortex., The Journal of Physiology 500, 409 (1997)

    1997

  58. [66]

    Markram, A network of tufted layer 5 pyramidal neu- rons., Cerebral Cortex 7, 523 (1997)

    H. Markram, A network of tufted layer 5 pyramidal neu- rons., Cerebral Cortex 7, 523 (1997)

    1997

  59. [67]

    A. L. Bodor, C. M. Schneider-Mizell, C. Zhang, L. Elab- bady, A. Mallen, A. Bergeson, D. Brittain, J. Buchanan, D. J. Bumbarger, R. Dalley, C. Gamlin, E. Joyce, D. Kapner, S. Kinn, G. Mahalingam, S. Seshamani, S. Suckow, M. Takeno, R. Torres, W. Yin, J. A. Bae, M. A. Castro, S...

    2025

  60. [68]

    Schiller, G

    J. Schiller, G. Major, H. J. Koester, and Y. Schiller, NMDA spikes in basal dendrites of cortical pyramidal neurons, Nature 404, 285 (2000)

    2000

  61. [69]

    Nevian, M

    T. Nevian, M. E. Larkum, A. Polsky, and J. Schiller, Properties of basal dendrites of layer 5 pyramidal neu- rons: A direct patch-clamp recording study, Nature Neu- roscience 10, 206 (2007)

    2007

  62. [70]

    M. E. Larkum, T. Nevian, M. Sandler, A. Polsky, and J. Schiller, Synaptic Integration in Tuft Dendrites of Layer 5 Pyramidal Neurons: A New Unifying Principle, Science 325, 756 (2009)

    2009

  63. [71]

    J. E. Rubin, Gerkin, R.C., Bi, G-Q., and Chow, C., Calcium Time Course as a Signal for Spike-Timing- Dependent Plasticity, Journal of Neurophysiology 93, 2600 (2005)

    2005

  64. [72]

    H. Z. Shouval, S. S.-H. Wang, and G. M. Wittenberg, Spike Timing Dependent Plasticity: A Consequence of More Fundamental Learning Rules, Frontiers in Com- putational Neuroscience 4, 10.3389/fncom.2010.00019 (2010)

    2010 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Graupner and N

    M. Graupner and N. Brunel, Calcium-based plasticity model explains sensitivity of synaptic changes to spike pattern, rate, and dendritic location, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 3991 (2012)

    2012

  66. [74]

    Helias and D

    M. Helias and D. Dahmen, Statistical Field Theory for Neural Networks, Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer In- ternational Publishing, 2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena (Clarendon Press, 2002)

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phe- nomena (Clarendon Press, 2002)

    2002

  68. [76]

    Berges, Introduction to Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory, in AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol

    J. Berges, Introduction to Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory, in AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 739 (2004) pp. 3–62, arXiv:hep-ph/0409233

    2004 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.