Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 1 cited by

Translation Groups for arbitrary Gauge Fields in Synthetic Crystals with real hopping amplitudes

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cayley crystals with real hopping amplitudes realize magnetic translation groups for arbitrary discrete gauge groups, with gauge-field types classified by the commutator subgroup.

desk verdict The abstract is a plausible and specific claim about generalizing magnetic translation groups, but the supplied full text is a different paper, so the math is unrefereed and unverified. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.08461 v2 pith:WO4O36IT submitted 2025-08-11 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.othercond-mat.soft

Marco Marciani This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.othercond-mat.soft
keywords CayleycrystalsmagnetictranslationgroupsdiscretegaugefieldsWilsonloopscommutatorsubgrouprealhoppingamplitudessyntheticlatticestight-binding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that Cayley crystals—lattices whose translation group is generic and possibly non-commutative—realize the magnetic translation groups of solid-state physics in full generality, for any discrete gauge group. The possible gauge-field types are classified by the irreducible representations of the commutator subgroup C of the translation group G, while the Wilson-loop configurations, which need not be homogeneous, are fixed by how C sits inside G. The paper proves a theorem that, for every cyclic gauge group, lists all compatible translation groups, and it constructs two-dimensional Cayley crystals equivalent to square lattices threaded by inhomogeneous magnetic flux. The payoff is experimental: all of this can be built with only real hopping amplitudes and in scalable geometries, so synthetic platforms can explore static gauge fields, charges in superposition, and non-homogeneous flux without complex bond phases.

What carries the argument

The Cayley crystal: a lattice whose Hamiltonian has a generic (possibly non-commutative) translation group G. The gauge structure is carried by the commutator subgroup C ⊂ G: irreducible representations of C enumerate the possible gauge-field types, and the embedding of C into G fixes the Wilson-loop configuration (which need not be homogeneous). A classification theorem completes the picture for cyclic gauge groups, and the use of only real hopping amplitudes is the enabler that turns the group-theoretic construction into a physical proposal.

What would settle it

Simulate a two-dimensional Cayley crystal whose commutator subgroup is $C = \mathbb{Z}_3$, compute the Wilson loops around every plaquette as the theorem prescribes, and check in a real-amplitude tight-binding model that non-homogeneous flux patterns actually appear; if all loops evaluate to the identity, the classification is vacuous. Alternatively, find a cyclic gauge group and a compatible translation group not produced by the theorem, which would disprove its completeness.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a one-body tight-binding Hamiltonian on a Cayley crystal behaves like a particle carrying a superposition of charges, each coupled to a distinct static gauge-field configuration. The gauge-field types are determined by the irreducible representations of the commutator subgroup C ⊂ G, and the Wilson-loop configurations—the phases accumulated around closed paths, generically inhomogeneous—are fixed by the embedding of C in G. For any cyclic gauge group, a proven theorem yields all compatible translation groups, making the classification complete in the cyclic case (assuming C finite). The construction uses only real hopping amplitudes, which is what makes the proposal

Load-bearing premise

The engineering claim collapses if restricting all hopping amplitudes to real numbers forces the Wilson-loop configurations to be homogeneous or trivial; the classification also assumes the commutator subgroup C is finite.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any one-body tight-binding Hamiltonian on a Cayley crystal with finite commutator subgroup C emulates a particle in a static gauge field labelled by an irreducible representation of C.
  • Wilson loops are generally inhomogeneous, so these crystals can realize spatially varying magnetic flux without requiring complex hopping amplitudes.
  • For every cyclic gauge group, the theorem gives a complete list of compatible translation groups, providing a design catalogue for synthetic platforms.
  • Real hopping amplitudes mean the proposal maps directly onto photonic, circuit-QED and metamaterial implementations.
  • Cayley crystals can be built in scalable geometries that host dynamics in more than three effective dimensions, expanding the reach of gauge-field emulation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The classification likely works in reverse as a design tool: choose a desired gauge-field configuration, then engineer G and the embedding of C to produce it, rather than analyzing an existing lattice.
  • The non-cyclic case is the natural next test: the theorem is stated for cyclic gauge groups, and whether the translation-group classification extends to, say, non-Abelian gauge groups from non-cyclic commutator subgroups is left open.
  • The picture of a particle carrying a superposition of charges could be probed experimentally by looking for multi-frequency Aharonov–Bohm interference in a real-amplitude Cayley crystal.
  • The full text supplied with the record is a different paper (on NV-center entanglement), so this summary rests on the abstract alone; a complete reading of the actual manuscript would be needed to verify the proof.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The abstract of arXiv:2508.08461 claims that Cayley crystals introduced by Lux and Prodan realize a generalization of magnetic translation groups to arbitrary discrete gauge groups. It further claims that the possible types of gauge fields are classified by irreducible representations of the commutator subgroup C of the translation group G, that Wilson-loop configurations (not necessarily homogeneous) are fixed by the embedding of C in G, and that a theorem enumerates all compatible translation groups for any cyclic gauge group. Two-dimensional examples equivalent to square lattices with inhomogeneous magnetic fluxes are promised, and it is asserted that the construction requires only real hopping amplitudes. The document supplied as the full text, however, is a different paper (arXiv:2508.08465, Minnella et al., on multipartite entanglement in a room-temperature NV-center register). No definitions, equations, hypotheses, proofs, or examples for the claimed results appear in the supplied text, so the soundness of the target paper cannot be assessed from the material provided.

Significance. If the abstract's claims are correct, the paper would provide a group-theoretic classification of translation groups and gauge configurations realizable in synthetic crystals with real hopping amplitudes, and would be of engineering interest for metamaterials, cQED, and other synthetic platforms. The construction appears to build additively on the cited Lux-Prodan framework, and the promised 2D inhomogeneous-flux examples would give falsifiable predictions. However, none of this content is visible in the submitted full text. There are no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, parameter-free derivations, or even stated theorems to evaluate. The significance therefore cannot be confirmed; the central claims are asserted in the abstract but unsupported by the supplied manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text, p. 1 footer] The full text supplied is not the manuscript for arXiv:2508.08461. The page-1 footer reads 'arXiv:2508.08465v2 [quant-ph] 21 Feb 2026' and the document is Minnella et al., 'Single-gate, multipartite entanglement on a room-temperature quantum register.' None of the target paper's content—Cayley crystals, translation groups, commutator subgroup C, the cyclic-group theorem, or the 2D flux examples—appears in this document. This structural mismatch prevents any substantive review of the target paper's derivations, hypotheses, or proofs.
  2. [Abstract, 'real hopping amplitudes' claim] The central engineering premise is that the generalized magnetic translation groups can be realized with only real hopping amplitudes. This is load-bearing: if reality of the hopping amplitudes forced the gauge configurations to be trivial or homogeneous, the emulation claim and the proposed experiments would collapse. The supplied text contains no Hamiltonian, no definition of the hopping amplitudes, and no argument that non-homogeneous Wilson-loop configurations survive this restriction. The claim is asserted but not demonstrated in any visible material.
  3. [Abstract, cyclic-group theorem and classification] The abstract states that 'the possible types of gauge fields are determined by the irreducible representations of the commutator subgroup C' and that a theorem 'for any cyclic gauge group yields all compatible translation groups.' No hypotheses, equations, definitions of the relevant representations, or proof locations appear in the visible document. Because these classification statements are the paper's principal mathematical contributions, their complete absence makes a soundness determination impossible.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract, penultimate sentence] Typo: 'is analyze in depth' should read 'is analyzed in depth.' Also, 'higher-than-3D dynamics' is ambiguous; presumably 'higher-than-three-dimensional geometries' is meant.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be identified from the available evidence: the supplied full text is arXiv:2508.08465 (an NV-center experiment), not the target paper arXiv:2508.08461, so no derivation chain is available to inspect.

full rationale

The abstract of the target paper claims a classification and realization result for translation groups in synthetic crystals, but the supplied 'FULL TEXT' is a different paper: its footer reads 'arXiv:2508.08465v2 [quant-ph] 21 Feb 2026' and its title is 'Single-gate, multipartite entanglement on a room-temperature quantum register'. None of the target paper's equations, constructions, or proofs are present. Under the instruction to claim circularity only when a specific reduction can be quoted and exhibited, I cannot demonstrate any circular step: there is no self-definitional tautology, no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation chain visible in the supplied text. The abstract's claims may or may not be sound, and the real-hopping feasibility claim is unverified, but those are correctness/evidence-integrity concerns, not circularity. The honest finding is therefore no circularity in the available evidence, with the caveat that the actual manuscript was not supplied.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted numbers appear in the abstract; the only numerical content is the constraint that hoppings be real. The paper rests on the imported Cayley-crystal definition (Lux-Prodan), on standard representation theory, on the physical dictionary between tight-binding dynamics and static gauge fields, and on the explicit finiteness restriction on the commutator subgroup. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Cayley crystals as defined in Lux-Prodan carry a generic (possibly non-commutative) translation group G and a Hamiltonian of the specified form.
    The abstract imports the construction from the cited prior work and builds everything on it; if those systems differ from the claimed class, the generalization collapses. Abstract, first paragraph.
  • standard math Standard representation theory of finite groups, including irreps of the commutator subgroup C and embedding data of C in G.
    Invoked by the classification claims. Standard mathematics, no additional burden.
  • domain assumption One-body tight-binding dynamics on a Cayley graph with real hopping amplitudes faithfully emulates a particle coupled to static gauge fields.
    The physical-to-algebraic dictionary underlying the whole paper; stated in the abstract but not derived in the visible text. This is the premise on which the experimental relevance rests.
  • domain assumption The commutator subgroup C is finite for the in-depth analysis.
    The abstract explicitly says the analysis is performed 'assuming C finite', so the general claims are only established for finite commutator subgroups; infinite-group cases are open.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Translation Groups for arbitrary Gauge Fields in Synthetic Crystals with real hopping amplitudes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WO4O36IT

@misc{pith2026250808461,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Translation Groups for arbitrary Gauge Fields in Synthetic Crystals with real hopping amplitudes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WO4O36IT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.08461}
}
abstract

The Cayley-crystals introduced in [F. R. Lux and E. Prodan, Annales Henri Poincar\'e 25(8), 3563 (2024)] are a class of lattices endowed with a Hamiltonian whose translation group $G$ is generic and possibly non-commutative. We show that these systems naturally realize the generalization of the so-called magnetic translation groups to arbitrary discrete gauge groups. A one-body dynamics emulates that of a particle carrying a superposition of charges, each coupled to distinct static gauge-field configuration. The possible types of gauge fields are determined by the irreducible representations of the commutator subgroup $C \subset G$, while the Wilson-loop configurations - which need not be homogeneous - are fixed by the embedding of $C$ in $G$. The role of other subgroups in shaping both the lattice geometry and the dynamics is analyze in depth assuming $C$ finite. We discuss a theorem of direct engineering relevance that, for any cyclic gauge group, yields all compatible translation groups. We then construct two-dimensional examples of Cayley-crystals equivalent to square lattices threaded by inhomogeneous magnetic fluxes. Importantly, Cayley-crystals can be realized with only real hopping amplitudes and in scalable geometries that can fit higher-than-3D dynamics, enabling experimental exploration and eventual exploitation in metamaterials, cQED, and other synthetic platforms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Realization of Arbitrary Gauge Fields via Symmetry-Protected Zero Modes

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-08 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A zero-mode construction realizes arbitrary static O(N) lattice gauge fields exactly in artificial tight-binding systems with only positive couplings, demonstrated in acoustic crystals.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Pompili, S

    M. Pompili, S. L. Hermans, S. Baier, H. K. Beukers, P. C. Humphreys, R. N. Schouten, R. F. Vermeulen, M. J. Tiggelman, L. dos Santos Martins, B. Dirkse,et al., Real- ization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid- state qubits, Science372, 259 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Hermans, M

    S. Hermans, M. Pompili, H. Beukers, S. Baier, J. Borre- gaard, and R. Hanson, Qubit teleportation between non- neighbouring nodes in a quantum network, Nature605, 663 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    C. M. Knaut, A. Suleymanzade, Y.-C. Wei, D. R. As- sumpcao, P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, M. Sutula, G. Baranes,et al., Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom net- work, Nature629, 573 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Chang, P.-Y

    X.-Y. Chang, P.-Y. Hou, W.-G. Zhang, X.-Q. Meng, Y.- F. Yu, Y.-N. Lu, Y.-Q. Liu, B.-X. Qi, D.-L. Deng, and L.- M. Duan, Hybrid entanglement and bit-flip error correc- tion in a scalable quantum network node, Nature Physics 21, 583 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Bersin, M

    E. Bersin, M. Sutula, Y. Q. Huan, A. Suleymanzade, D. R. Assumpcao, Y.-C. Wei, P.-J. Stas, C. M. Knaut, E.N.Knall, C.Langrock,et al.,Telecomnetworkingwith a diamond quantum memory, PRX Quantum5, 010303 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, A. Su- leymanzade, B. Pingault, M. Sutula, S. W. Ding, C. M. Knaut, D. R. Assumpcao,et al., Robust multi-qubit quantum network node with integrated error detection, Science378, 557 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    A. E. Rugar, S. Aghaeimeibodi, D. Riedel, C. Dory, H. Lu, P. J. McQuade, Z.-X. Shen, N. A. Melosh, and J. Vučković, Quantum photonic interface for tin- vacancy centers in diamond, Physical Review X11, 031021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Van der Sar, Z

    T. Van der Sar, Z. Wang, M. Blok, H. Bernien, T. Taminiau, D. Toyli, D. Lidar, D. Awschalom, R. Han- son,andV.Dobrovitski,Decoherence-protectedquantum gates for a hybrid solid-state spin register, Nature484, 82 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 52 references
  1. [9]

    Jiang, Y

    X.Rong, J.Geng, F.Shi, Y.Liu, K.Xu, W.Ma, F.Kong, Z. Jiang, Y. Wu, and J. Du, Experimental fault-tolerant universal quantum gates with solid-state spins under am- bient conditions, Nature communications6, 8748 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    C. E. Bradley, J. Randall, M. H. Abobeih, R. C. Berrevoets, M. J. Degen, M. A. Bakker, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and T. H. Taminiau, A ten-qubit solid- state spin register with quantum memory up to one minute, Physical Review X9, 031045 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    M. H. Abobeih, Y. Wang, J. Randall, S. Loenen, C. E. Bradley, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, B. M. Terhal, and T. H. Taminiau, Fault-tolerant operation of a logical qubit in a diamond quantum processor, Nature606, 884 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    R. Nagy, M. Niethammer, M. Widmann, Y.-C. Chen, P. Udvarhelyi, C. Bonato, J. U. Hassan, R. Karhu, I. G. Ivanov, N. T. Son,et al., High-fidelity spin and optical control of single silicon-vacancy centres in silicon carbide, Nature communications10, 1954 (2019)

    1954

  5. [13]

    Bourassa, C

    A. Bourassa, C. P. Anderson, K. C. Miao, M. Onizhuk, H. Ma, A. L. Crook, H. Abe, J. Ul-Hassan, T. Ohshima, N. T. Son,et al., Entanglement and control of single nu- clear spins in isotopically engineered silicon carbide, Na- ture Materials19, 1319 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    I. B. Harris, I. Christen, S. M. Patomäki, H. Rani- wala, M. Sirotin, M. Colangelo, K. C. Chen, C. Errando- Herranz, D. J. Starling, R. Murphy,et al., High-fidelity control of a strongly coupled electro-nuclear spin-photon interface, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09267 (2025). 11

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    H. K. Beukers, C. Waas, M. Pasini, H. B. Van Ommen, Z. Ademi, M. Iuliano, N. Codreanu, J. M. Brevoord, T. Turan, T. H. Taminiau,et al., Control of solid-state nuclear spin qubits using an electron spin-1/2, Physical Review X15, 021011 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Waldherr, Y

    G. Waldherr, Y. Wang, S. Zaiser, M. Jamali, T. Schulte- Herbrüggen, H.Abe, T.Ohshima, J.Isoya, J.Du, P.Neu- mann,et al., Quantum error correction in a solid-state hybrid spin register, Nature506, 204 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Reiner, Y

    J. Reiner, Y. Chung, S. Misha, C. Lehner, C. Moehle, D. Poulos, S. Monir, K. Charde, P. Macha, L. Kranz, et al., High-fidelity initialization and control of electron and nuclear spins in a four-qubit register, Nature Nan- otechnology19, 605 (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Thorvaldson, D

    I. Thorvaldson, D. Poulos, C. M. Moehle, S. H. Misha, H. Edlbauer, J. Reiner, H. Geng, B. Voisin, M. T. Jones, M. B. Donnelly,et al., Grover’s algorithm in a four-qubit silicon processor above the fault-tolerant threshold, Na- ture Nanotechnology , 1 (2025)

    2025

  11. [19]

    Edlbauer, J

    H. Edlbauer, J. Wang, A. S.-E. Huq, I. Thorvaldson, M. T. Jones, S. H. Misha, W. J. Pappas, C. M. Moehle, Y.-L. Hsueh, H. Bornemann,et al., An 11-qubit atom processor in silicon, Nature648, 569 (2025)

    2025

  12. [20]

    J. Du, F. Shi, X. Kong, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Single-molecule scale magnetic resonance spectroscopy using quantum diamond sensors, Reviews of Modern Physics96, 025001 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Abobeih, J

    M. Abobeih, J. Randall, C. Bradley, H. Bartling, M. Bakker, M. Degen, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, and T. Taminiau, Atomic-scale imaging of a 27-nuclear-spin cluster using a quantum sensor, Nature576, 411 (2019)

    2019

  14. [22]

    Van de Stolpe, D

    G. Van de Stolpe, D. Kwiatkowski, C. Bradley, J. Randall, M. Abobeih, S. Breitweiser, L. Bassett, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, and T. Taminiau, Mapping a 50-spin-qubitnetworkthroughcorrelatedsensing,Nature Communications15, 2006 (2024)

    2006

  15. [23]

    S. A. Breitweiser, M. Ouellet, T.-Y. Huang, T. H. Taminiau, and L. C. Bassett, Quadrupolar reso- nance spectroscopy of individual nuclei using a room- temperature quantum sensor, Nano Letters24, 16253 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    A. Ajoy, U. Bissbort, M. D. Lukin, R. Walsworth, and P. Cappellaro, Atomic-scale nuclear spin imaging using quantum-assisted sensors in diamond, Physical Review X 5, 011001 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Zaiser, T

    S. Zaiser, T. Rendler, I. Jakobi, T. Wolf, S.-Y. Lee, S. Wagner, V. Bergholm, T. Schulte-Herbrüggen, P. Neu- mann, and J. Wrachtrup, Enhancing quantum sensing sensitivity by a quantum memory, Nature communica- tions7, 12279 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of modern physics89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    T.Xie, Z.Zhao, X.Kong, W.Ma, M.Wang, X.Ye, P.Yu, Z. Yang, S. Xu, P. Wang,et al., Beating the standard quantum limit under ambient conditions with solid-state spins, Science advances7, eabg9204 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Taminiau, J

    T. Taminiau, J. Wagenaar, T. Van der Sar, F. Jelezko, V. V. Dobrovitski, and R. Hanson, Detection and control of individual nuclear spins using a weakly coupled elec- tron spin, Physical review letters109, 137602 (2012)

    2012

  21. [29]

    was experimentally verified using single qubit nu- clear state tomography (see the Supplementary Informa- tion (SI), Sec. V). Fig. 2c highlights the key steps of the DD gate MQC process. Given the form of theCX π/2 entangling gate, local gates are required to prepare aZ-basis ...

  22. [30]

    K. S. Cujia, K. Herb, J. Zopes, J. M. Abendroth, and C. L. Degen, Parallel detection and spatial mapping of large nuclear spin clusters, Nature Communications13, 1260 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    T. H. Taminiau, J. Cramer, T. van der Sar, V. V. Do- brovitski,andR.Hanson,Universalcontrolanderrorcor- rection in multi-qubit spin registers in diamond, Nature nanotechnology9, 171 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    D. A. Hopper, H. J. Shulevitz, and L. C. Bassett, Spin readout techniques of the nitrogen-vacancy center in di- amond, Micromachines9, 437 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Bartling, M

    H. Bartling, M. Abobeih, B. Pingault, M. Degen, S. Loe- nen, C. Bradley, J. Randall, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, and T. Taminiau, Entanglement of spin-pair qubits with intrinsic dephasing times exceeding a minute, Physical Review X12, 011048 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Levine, A

    H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, M. Greiner, V. Vuletić, H. Pichler,et al., Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with neutral atoms, Physical review let- ters123, 170503 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Kenny, F

    J. Kenny, F. Zhou, R. He, F. Jelezko, T. S. Koh, and W. Gao, Quantum sensing enhancement through a nu- clear spin register in nitrogen-vacancy centers in dia- mond, Applied Physics Reviews12(2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, M. Kalinowski, S. Ebadi, T. Manovitz, H. Zhou, S. H. Li, A. A. Geim, T. T. Wang, N. Maskara,et al., High-fidelity parallel entangling gates on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature622, 268 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Y. Lu, S. Zhang, K. Zhang, W. Chen, Y. Shen, J. Zhang, J.-N. Zhang, and K. Kim, Global entangling gates on arbitrary ion qubits, Nature572, 363 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Grzesiak, R

    N. Grzesiak, R. Blümel, K. Wright, K. M. Beck, N. C. Pisenti, M. Li, V. Chaplin, J. M. Amini, S. Debnath, J.- S. Chen,et al., Efficient arbitrary simultaneously entan- gling gates on a trapped-ion quantum computer, Nature communications11, 2963 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Y. Zhu, A. M. Green, N. H. Nguyen, C. Huerta Alderete, E. Mossman, and N. M. Linke, Pairwise-parallel entan- gling gates on orthogonal modes in a trapped-ion chain, Advanced Quantum Technologies6, 2300056 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    E.Takou, E.Barnes,andS.E.Economou,Precisecontrol of entanglement in multinuclear spin registers coupled to defects, Physical Review X13, 011004 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    Figgatt, A

    C. Figgatt, A. Ostrander, N. M. Linke, K. A. Landsman, D. Zhu, D. Maslov, and C. Monroe, Parallel entangling operations on a universal ion-trap quantum computer, Nature572, 368 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    J. Baum, M. Munowitz, A. N. Garroway, and A. Pines, Multiple-quantum dynamics in solid state NMR, The Journal of chemical physics83, 2015 (1985)

    2015

  35. [43]

    2a), theMqubit register is first initialized to |0⟩⊗M

    (Fig. 2a), theMqubit register is first initialized to |0⟩⊗M. The control (top) qubitq c is then placed into an equal superposition state so that the following CNOT gates create a GHZ state. Once entangled, each qubit’s relative phase is shifted by an equal amountϕyielding |GHZ...

  36. [44]

    Takou, E

    E. Takou, E. Barnes, and S. E. Economou, Generation of genuine all-way entanglement in defect-nuclear spin sys- tems through dynamical decoupling sequences, Quantum 8, 1304 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    K. X. Wei, I. Lauer, S. Srinivasan, N. Sundaresan, D. T. McClure, D. Toyli, D. C. McKay, J. M. Gam- betta, and S. Sheldon, Verifying multipartite entangled Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states via multiple quan- tum coherences, Physical Review A101, 032343 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    D. D. Sukachev, A. Sipahigil, C. T. Nguyen, M. K. Bhaskar, R. E. Evans, F. Jelezko, and M. D. Lukin, Silicon-vacancy spin qubit in diamond: a quantum mem- ory exceeding 10 ms with single-shot state readout, Phys- ical review letters119, 223602 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    K. M. Itoh and H. Watanabe, Isotope engineering of sil- icon and diamond for quantum computing and sensing 12 applications, MRS communications4, 143 (2014)

    2014

  40. [48]

    Robledo, L

    L. Robledo, L. Childress, H. Bernien, B. Hensen, P. F. Alkemade, and R. Hanson, High-fidelity projective read- out of a solid-state spin quantum register, Nature477, 574 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    Neumann, J

    P. Neumann, J. Beck, M. Steiner, F. Rempp, H. Fedder, P. R. Hemmer, J. Wrachtrup, and F. Jelezko, Single-shot readout of a single nuclear spin, Science329, 542 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    D. A. Hopper, J. D. Lauigan, T.-Y. Huang, and L. C. Bassett, Real-time charge initialization of dia- mond nitrogen-vacancy centers for enhanced spin read- out, Physical Review Applied13, 024016 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Schwartz, J

    I. Schwartz, J. Scheuer, B. Tratzmiller, S. Müller, Q. Chen, I. Dhand, Z.-Y. Wang, C. Müller, B. Naydenov, F. Jelezko,et al., Robust optical polarization of nuclear spin baths using hamiltonian engineering of nitrogen- vacancy center quantum dynamics, Science advances4, eaat89...

    2018

  44. [52]

    Dobrovitski, G

    V. Dobrovitski, G. De Lange, D. Riste, and R. Hanson, Bootstrap tomography of the pulses for quantum control, Physical review letters105, 077601 (2010)

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.