pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.08638 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · gr-qc· hep-th

Interacting bosonic dark energy and fermionic dark matter in Einstein scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity

Simran Arora , Saddam Hussain , Benjamin Rose , Anzhong Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th
keywords dark energydark matter interactionGauss-Bonnet gravitycosmological dynamicsgravitational wavesdynamical systemsobservational constraintsRoman Space Telescope
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

A Gauss-Bonnet coupled scalar dark energy interacting with fermionic dark matter produces cosmologies that closely track the LambdaCDM expansion history while permitting testable deviations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a string-theory-inspired setup in which a scalar field coupled to the Gauss-Bonnet term serves as dark energy and interacts with fermionic dark matter. Two scalar potentials, exponential and power-law, are examined in scenarios where gravitational-wave speed either equals or differs from light speed, always respecting present limits. The field equations are recast as an autonomous dynamical system to follow the sequence of radiation, matter, and dark-energy eras. Parameters are fitted to current observations together with mock high-redshift data from the Roman Space Telescope. Both potentials yield expansion histories that match the standard model yet leave room for small, future-detectable departures.

Core claim

In Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity the interacting bosonic dark energy and fermionic dark matter system, equipped with either an exponential or power-law potential, evolves through the standard cosmic epochs while satisfying gravitational-wave speed constraints and reproducing the observed expansion history to high accuracy.

What carries the argument

The autonomous dynamical system formed by rewriting the Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet field equations, which tracks density parameters and equation-of-state variables and incorporates the Gauss-Bonnet term's modification to gravitational-wave propagation speed.

Load-bearing premise

The coupling between the scalar dark energy and fermionic dark matter is taken to arise from particle-physics considerations, and the models must obey current limits on the difference between gravitational-wave and light speeds.

What would settle it

High-redshift expansion-rate measurements from the Roman Space Telescope that lie outside the narrow interval allowed by the model's best-fit parameters would rule out these cosmologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.08638 by Anzhong Wang, Benjamin Rose, Saddam Hussain, Simran Arora.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of the Hubble parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The evolution of the cosmological parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The evolution of the cosmological parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Marginalized one-dimensional posterior distributions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Marginalized one-dimensional posterior distributions and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Residual Hubble diagram showing the difference in distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore a cosmological framework in which a Gauss-Bonnet (GB) coupled scalar field, acting as dark energy, interacts with a fermionic dark matter field through a coupling obtained from the point of view of particle physics. This setup is inspired by string/M-theory, and two representative scalar field potentials are investigated: exponential and power-law. A distinctive feature of the GB-coupled models is their potential to alter the propagation speed of gravitational waves (GWs), a property with significant implications in light of recent multi-messenger astrophysical observations. To account for this, we analyze models under two scenarios: one where the GW speed differs from that of light and the other where they are equal, but all consistent with current observational constraints. The dynamical evolution of the system is investigated by reformulating the field equations into an autonomous dynamical system, enabling a detailed analysis of the Universe's long-term behavior, including the radiation-, matter- and dark energy-dominated epochs. We constrain the model parameters using a broad set of recent observational data, including mock high-redshift measurements from the Roman Space Telescope. Our findings indicate that both potentials yield cosmologies that are in excellent agreement with current data, closely tracking the expansion history predicted by the standard \(\Lambda\)CDM model, while still allowing room for subtle deviations that could be tested by future observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a cosmological model in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity where a GB-coupled scalar field serves as bosonic dark energy and interacts with fermionic dark matter via a particle-physics-motivated coupling. Two scalar potentials (exponential and power-law) are examined. The field equations are recast as an autonomous dynamical system to study the radiation-, matter-, and dark-energy-dominated epochs. The models are analyzed in two scenarios for gravitational-wave propagation speed (c_GW ≠ c and c_GW = c), both required to satisfy current constraints. Parameters are constrained against recent observational data sets including mock high-redshift measurements from the Roman Space Telescope. The central finding is that both potentials produce expansion histories in excellent agreement with ΛCDM while permitting subtle, potentially testable deviations.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a concrete string/M-theory-inspired example of interacting DE-DM in modified gravity that remains viable under multi-messenger GW-speed bounds and yields observationally acceptable cosmologies. The autonomous-system treatment and forward-looking use of Roman mock data are positive features that allow quantitative exploration of late-time deviations from ΛCDM.

major comments (2)
  1. [GW-speed analysis] GW-speed section (around the definition of c_T²): the claim that both scenarios remain consistent with data and that the GB sector is probed is load-bearing. In the c_T = 1 case the relation c_T² = 1 − 2 f'(φ) φ̇ / (3H² + …) typically forces f'(φ) = 0 or an exact cancellation at background level. The manuscript must show explicitly, for the best-fit parameters in this scenario, whether the effective GB contribution to the Friedmann equations remains non-zero at late times or whether the model collapses to ordinary interacting bosonic DE + fermionic DM. Without this demonstration the data agreement does not test the distinctive GB modification.
  2. [Observational constraints] Parameter-constraint section (tables of best-fit values and χ²): the reported agreement with ΛCDM is quantified only by visual tracking of the expansion history. A direct Δχ² or Bayesian-evidence comparison against flat ΛCDM (with the same data combination) is required to establish whether the extra parameters yield a statistically meaningful improvement or are merely consistent with no deviation. This comparison is essential for the claim that the models “allow room for subtle deviations that could be tested by future observations.”
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model setup] The interaction Lagrangian is stated to be “obtained from the point of view of particle physics,” but the explicit form of the coupling function and its derivation are not reproduced; a short appendix or reference to the precise interaction term would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the GB coupling function f(φ) and the interaction strength should be unified between the text, equations, and figure captions to avoid minor confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating the revisions we will implement to strengthen the presentation and claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [GW-speed analysis] GW-speed section (around the definition of c_T²): the claim that both scenarios remain consistent with data and that the GB sector is probed is load-bearing. In the c_T = 1 case the relation c_T² = 1 − 2 f'(φ) φ̇ / (3H² + …) typically forces f'(φ) = 0 or an exact cancellation at background level. The manuscript must show explicitly, for the best-fit parameters in this scenario, whether the effective GB contribution to the Friedmann equations remains non-zero at late times or whether the model collapses to ordinary interacting bosonic DE + fermionic DM. Without this demonstration the data agreement does not test the distinctive GB modification.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee’s emphasis on this key distinction. In the c_T = 1 scenario we impose the constraint that enforces c_T² = 1 at the level of the tensor perturbation equations. This constraint acts on the combination involving f'(φ)φ̇ but does not automatically nullify the Gauss-Bonnet contribution to the background Friedmann equations, which enters through the effective energy density and pressure terms. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that an explicit verification for the best-fit parameters is necessary to confirm that the GB sector remains active at late times. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection or figure that evaluates the GB term in the Friedmann equation for the reported best-fit values in the c_T = 1 case, demonstrating that the contribution is non-vanishing while the propagation-speed constraint is satisfied. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Observational constraints] Parameter-constraint section (tables of best-fit values and χ²): the reported agreement with ΛCDM is quantified only by visual tracking of the expansion history. A direct Δχ² or Bayesian-evidence comparison against flat ΛCDM (with the same data combination) is required to establish whether the extra parameters yield a statistically meaningful improvement or are merely consistent with no deviation. This comparison is essential for the claim that the models “allow room for subtle deviations that could be tested by future observations.”

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative statistical comparison is required to substantiate the statements about consistency with ΛCDM and the potential for future tests. The current manuscript presents best-fit parameters and χ² values but does not include a direct Δχ² or evidence ratio relative to flat ΛCDM on the identical data combination. In the revised version we will compute and report Δχ² (and, if feasible, the Bayesian evidence difference) against flat ΛCDM using the same observational data sets. This will allow a clearer assessment of whether the additional parameters yield a statistically meaningful improvement or remain consistent with no deviation, thereby supporting the discussion of subtle, testable departures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives the model from Einstein-scalar-GB action with an interaction term motivated by particle physics, reformulates the equations as an autonomous dynamical system to study fixed points for radiation/matter/DE epochs, and then fits parameters to observational data (including mock Roman data) to show consistency with expansion history. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction; the data agreement follows from standard parameter estimation rather than tautological fitting of the target observables themselves. The two GW-speed scenarios are treated as separate cases, each checked against constraints, without evidence that one forces the GB sector to vanish by definition. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central dynamical or observational claims. This is a standard cosmology analysis with independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model relies on several fitted parameters for the potentials and couplings, and assumes the validity of the GB coupling and interaction without providing first-principles derivation from string theory.

free parameters (2)
  • interaction coupling strength
    The strength of interaction between bosonic DE and fermionic DM is adjusted to fit observational data.
  • potential parameters
    Parameters in the exponential and power-law potentials for the scalar field are constrained by data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The gravitational action includes the Einstein-Hilbert term plus scalar-Gauss-Bonnet coupling
    This is the foundational modified gravity framework assumed throughout the analysis.
  • ad hoc to paper The interaction term between scalar and fermion is motivated by particle physics
    The specific form of the coupling is chosen based on particle physics considerations without independent derivation in the paper.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5782 in / 1510 out tokens · 55123 ms · 2026-05-18T23:38:35.830037+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · 48 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    × 10-15 1.5 × 10-15 N=log a cT 2-1 FIG. 1. The evolution of the cosmological parametersΩ 𝜙,Ω 𝜓,Ω 𝑟, and𝑤 tot for Model I is shown as a function of𝑁. The system is initialized with the parameter values:𝛽=10 −8,𝑊 0 =1,𝑥 0 = 10−11,𝑦 0 =0.82,𝑧 0 =0.15,𝑣 0 =10 −23,𝐵=0.1, and𝜌 0 = 0.009. We also examine the evolution of the gravitational wave (GW) constraint fo...

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    A. G. Riesset al.(Supernova Search Team), Observational ev- idence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cos- mological constant, Astron. J.116, 1009 (1998), arXiv:astro- ph/9805201

    work page arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    1999, ApJ, 517, 565, doi: 10.1086/307221

    S. Perlmutteret al.(Supernova Cosmology Project), Measure- ments ofΩandΛfrom 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astro- phys. J.517, 565 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9812133

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  4. [4]

    Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev

    S. Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev. Mod. Phys.61, 1 (1989)

    work page 1989

  5. [5]

    Quintessence, Cosmic Coincidence, and the Cosmological Constant

    I. Zlatev, L.-M. Wang, and P. J. Steinhardt, Quintessence, cos- mic coincidence, and the cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 896 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9807002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury, and M. Trodden, Beyond the Cosmological Standard Model, Phys. Rept.568, 1 (2015), arXiv:1407.0059 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmo- logical parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Er- ratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    A. G. Riess, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri, D. Scolnic, D. Brout, S. Casertano, D. O. Jones, Y. Murakami, G. S. Anand, L. Breuval,et al., A comprehensive measurement of the lo- cal value of the hubble constant with 1 km s- 1 mpc- 1 uncer- tainty from the hubble space telescope and the sh0es team, The Astrophysical journal letters934, L7 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    Cosmology intertwined III: f σ8 and S8,

    E. Di Valentinoet al., Cosmology Intertwined III:𝑓 𝜎 8 and 𝑆8, Astropart. Phys.131, 102604 (2021), arXiv:2008.11285 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Amonet al.(DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data cali- bration, Phys

    A. Amonet al.(DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data cali- bration, Phys. Rev. D105, 023514 (2022), arXiv:2105.13543 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    T. M. C. Abbottet al.(DES), Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy cluster- ing and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D105, 023520 (2022), arXiv:2105.13549 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    A. G. Adameet al.(DESI), DESI 2024 VI: cosmological con- straints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations, JCAP02, 021, arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints

    M. Abdul Karimet al., DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints (2025), arXiv:2503.14738 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, The Cosmological Constant and Dark Energy, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 559 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0207347

    work page arXiv 2003

  15. [15]

    K. V. Berghaus, J. A. Kable, and V. Miranda, Quantifying scalar field dynamics with DESI 2024 Y1 BAO measurements, Phys. Rev. D110, 103524 (2024), arXiv:2404.14341 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Kritpetch, N

    C. Kritpetch, N. Roy, and N. Banerjee, Interacting dark sector: A dynamical system perspective, Phys. Rev. D111, 103501 (2025), arXiv:2405.10604 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Hussain, S

    S. Hussain, S. Nelleri, and K. Bhattacharya, Comprehensive study of k-essence model: dynamical system analysis and ob- servational constraints from latest Type Ia supernova and BAO observations, JCAP03, 025, arXiv:2406.07179 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Essentials of k-essence

    C. Armendariz-Picon, V. F. Mukhanov, and P. J. Steinhardt, Essentials of k essence, Phys. Rev. D63, 103510 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0006373

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  19. [19]

    R. J. Scherrer, Purely kinetic k-essence as unified dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 011301 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0402316

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  20. [20]

    Hussain, A

    S. Hussain, A. Chatterjee, and K. Bhattacharya, Ghost Conden- sates and Pure Kinetic k-Essence Condensates in the Presence of Field–Fluid Non-Minimal Coupling in the Dark Sector, Uni- verse9, 65 (2023), arXiv:2203.10607 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Bhattacharya, A

    K. Bhattacharya, A. Chatterjee, and S. Hussain, Dynamical stability in presence of non-minimal derivative dependent cou- pling of k-essence field with a relativistic fluid, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 488 (2023), arXiv:2206.12398 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    J. S. Bagla, H. K. Jassal, and T. Padmanabhan, Cosmology with tachyon field as dark energy, Phys. Rev. D67, 063504 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0212198

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  23. [23]

    Khoeini-Moghaddam, F

    S. Khoeini-Moghaddam, F. Momeni, and F. Yousefabadi, Fermionic tachyons as a source of dark energy, New Astron. 100, 101986 (2023), arXiv:1807.05871 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Notes on Ghost Dark Energy

    R.-G. Cai, Z.-L. Tuo, H.-B. Zhang, and Q. Su, Notes on Ghost Dark Energy, Phys. Rev. D84, 123501 (2011), arXiv:1011.3212 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  25. [25]

    Hussain, S

    S. Hussain, S. Chakraborty, N. Roy, and K. Bhattacharya, Dynamical systems analysis of tachyon-dark-energy models from a new perspective, Phys. Rev. D107, 063515 (2023), arXiv:2208.10352 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, f(R) Theories Of Gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 451 (2010), arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [27]

    Introduction to Modified Gravity and Gravitational Alternative for Dark Energy

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Introduction to modified gravity and gravitational alternative for dark energy, eConfC0602061, 06 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0601213

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  28. [28]

    Sokoliuk, S

    O. Sokoliuk, S. Arora, S. Praharaj, A. Baransky, and P. K. Sahoo, On the impact of f(Q) gravity on the large scale structure, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.522, 252 (2023), arXiv:2303.17341 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    M. A. Gorji, H. Motohashi, and S. Mukohyama, Stealth dark energy in scordatura DHOST theory, JCAP03, 081, arXiv:2009.11606 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2009

  30. [30]

    De Felice, A

    A. De Felice, A. Doll, and S. Mukohyama, A theory of type-II minimally modified gravity, JCAP09, 034, arXiv:2004.12549 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2004

  31. [31]

    Arora, S

    S. Arora, S. Mandal, S. Chakraborty, G. Leon, and P. K. Sahoo, Can f(R) gravity isotropise a pre-bounce contracting universe?, JCAP09, 042, arXiv:2207.08479 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  32. [32]

    G. N. Gadbail, S. Arora, P. K. Sahoo, and K. Bamba, Recon- struction of the singularity-free𝑓(R)gravity via Raychaudhuri equations, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 752 (2024), arXiv:2402.04813 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Horndeski theory and beyond: a review

    T. Kobayashi, Horndeski theory and beyond: a review, Rept. Prog. Phys.82, 086901 (2019), arXiv:1901.07183 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    Elizalde, S

    E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and V. K. Oikonomou, Propagation of gravitational waves in a dynamical worm- hole background for two-scalar Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet the- ory, Phys. Dark Univ.45, 101536 (2024), arXiv:2312.02889 14 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou, and G. S. Sharov, Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet cosmology confronted with observa- tions, JHEAp47, 100398 (2025), arXiv:2503.17946 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Hussain, A

    S. Hussain, A. Chatterjee, and K. Bhattacharya, Dynamical stability in models where dark matter and dark energy are nonminimally coupled to curvature, Phys. Rev. D108, 103502 (2023), arXiv:2305.19062 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Lanczos, A Remarkable property of the Riemann- Christoffel tensor in four dimensions, Annals Math.39, 842 (1938)

    C. Lanczos, A Remarkable property of the Riemann- Christoffel tensor in four dimensions, Annals Math.39, 842 (1938)

    work page 1938

  38. [38]

    Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations, J

    D. Lovelock, The Einstein tensor and its generalizations, J. Math. Phys.12, 498 (1971)

    work page 1971

  39. [39]

    D. J. Gross and J. H. Sloan, The Quartic Effective Action for the Heterotic String, Nucl. Phys. B291, 41 (1987)

    work page 1987

  40. [40]

    M. C. Bento and O. Bertolami, Maximally Symmetric Cos- mological Solutions of higher curvature string effective the- ories with dilatons, Phys. Lett. B368, 198 (1996), arXiv:gr- qc/9503057

    work page arXiv 1996

  41. [41]

    Ferrara, R

    S. Ferrara, R. R. Khuri, and R. Minasian, M theory on a Calabi-Yau manifold, Phys. Lett. B375, 81 (1996), arXiv:hep- th/9602102

    work page arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    R^4 Couplings in M and Type II Theories

    I. Antoniadis, S. Ferrara, R. Minasian, and K. S. Narain, R**4 couplings in M and type II theories on Calabi-Yau spaces, Nucl. Phys. B507, 571 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9707013

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  43. [43]

    Ostrogradsky, M ´emoires sur les ´equations diff´erentielles, relatives au probl `eme des isop ´erim`etres, Mem

    M. Ostrogradsky, M ´emoires sur les ´equations diff´erentielles, relatives au probl `eme des isop ´erim`etres, Mem. Acad. St. Pe- tersbourg6, 385 (1850)

    work page

  44. [44]

    Ho\v{r}ava Gravity at a Lifshitz Point: A Progress Report

    A. Wang, Hoˇrava gravity at a Lifshitz point: A progress report, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26, 1730014 (2017), arXiv:1701.06087 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Gauss-Bonnet dark energy

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and M. Sasaki, Gauss-Bonnet dark en- ergy, Phys. Rev. D71, 123509 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0504052

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  46. [46]

    Tsujikawa and M

    S. Tsujikawa and M. Sami, String-inspired cosmology: Late time transition from scaling matter era to dark energy universe caused by a Gauss-Bonnet coupling, JCAP01, 006, arXiv:hep- th/0608178

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    String-inspired Gauss-Bonnet gravity reconstructed from the universe expansion history and yielding the transition from matter dominance to dark energy

    G. Cognola, E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. Odintsov, and S. Zerbini, String-inspired Gauss-Bonnet gravity reconstructed from the universe expansion history and yielding the transition from matter dominance to dark energy, Phys. Rev. D75, 086002 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0611198

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  48. [48]

    S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, Inflationary Phe- nomenology of Einstein Gauss-Bonnet Gravity Compati- ble with GW170817, Phys. Lett. B797, 134874 (2019), arXiv:1908.07555 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  49. [49]

    Black-Hole Solutions with Scalar Hair in Einstein-Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Theories

    G. Antoniou, A. Bakopoulos, and P. Kanti, Black-Hole Solu- tions with Scalar Hair in Einstein-Scalar-Gauss-Bonnet Theo- ries, Phys. Rev. D97, 084037 (2018), arXiv:1711.07431 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Juli ´e and E

    F.-L. Juli ´e and E. Berti, Post-Newtonian dynamics and black hole thermodynamics in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D100, 104061 (2019), arXiv:1909.05258 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    W. E. East and F. Pretorius, Binary neutron star mergers in Einstein-scalar-Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D106, 104055 (2022), arXiv:2208.09488 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    A. D. Millano, G. Leon, and A. Paliathanasis, Global dynamics in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet scalar field cosmology with matter, Phys. Rev. D108, 023519 (2023), arXiv:2304.08659 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    L. N. Granda and D. F. Jimenez, Dark Energy from Gauss- Bonnet and non-minimal couplings, Phys. Rev. D90, 123512 (2014), arXiv:1411.4203 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Zhang, B

    S.-J. Zhang, B. Wang, A. Wang, and J. F. Saavedra, Ob- ject picture of scalar field perturbation on Kerr black hole in scalar-Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory, Phys. Rev. D102, 124056 (2020), arXiv:2010.05092 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela, and D. Pav´on, Further understanding the interaction between dark energy and dark matter: current status and future directions, Rept. Prog. Phys. 87, 036901 (2024), arXiv:2402.00819 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Benisty, S

    D. Benisty, S. Pan, D. Staicova, E. Di Valentino, and R. C. Nunes, Late-time constraints on interacting dark energy: Anal- ysis independent of H0, rd, and MB, Astron. Astrophys.688, A156 (2024), arXiv:2403.00056 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  57. [57]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri, O. Mena, and S. Vagnozzi, Nonminimal dark sector physics and cosmological tensions, Phys. Rev. D101, 063502 (2020), arXiv:1910.09853 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri, D. F. Mota, A. G. Riess, and J. Silk, In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 153001 (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  59. [59]

    W. Yang, S. Pan, E. Di Valentino, R. C. Nunes, S. Vagnozzi, and D. F. Mota, Tale of stable interacting dark energy, ob- servational signatures, and the𝐻 0 tension, JCAP09, 019, arXiv:1805.08252 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    J. S. Wang and F. Y. Wang, Cosmological model of the interac- tion between dark matter and dark energy, Astron. Astrophys. 564, A137 (2014), arXiv:1403.4318 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    Chakraborty, P

    A. Chakraborty, P. K. Chanda, S. Das, and K. Dutta, DESI results: Hint towards coupled dark matter and dark energy (2025), arXiv:2503.10806 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    L. L. Samojeden, F. P. Devecchi, and G. M. Kremer, Fermions in Brans-Dicke cosmology, Phys. Rev. D81, 027301 (2010), arXiv:1001.2285 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    M. O. Ribas, F. P. Devecchi, and G. M. Kremer, Cosmo- logical model with fermion and tachyon fields interacting via Yukawa-type potential, Mod. Phys. Lett. A31, 1650039 (2016), arXiv:1602.06874 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  64. [64]

    Benisty, Cosmology of fermionic dark energy cou- pled to curvature, Nucl

    D. Benisty, Cosmology of fermionic dark energy cou- pled to curvature, Nucl. Phys. B992, 116251 (2023), arXiv:1912.11124 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Fermion field as inflaton, dark energy and dark matter

    G. Grams, R. C. de Souza, and G. M. Kremer, Fermion field as inflaton, dark energy and dark matter, Class. Quant. Grav. 31, 185008 (2014), arXiv:1407.5481 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [66]

    G. R. Farrar and P. J. E. Peebles, Interacting dark matter and dark energy, Astrophys. J.604, 1 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0307316

    work page arXiv 2004

  67. [67]

    R. Bean, E. E. Flanagan, I. Laszlo, and M. Trodden, Constrain- ing Interactions in Cosmology’s Dark Sector, Phys. Rev. D78, 123514 (2008), arXiv:0808.1105 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  68. [68]

    J. L. Feng, Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.48, 495 (2010), arXiv:1003.0904 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  69. [69]

    Y. L. Bolotin, A. Kostenko, O. A. Lemets, and D. A. Yerokhin, Cosmological Evolution With Interaction Between Dark En- 15 ergy And Dark Matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1530007 (2014), arXiv:1310.0085 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    Chatterjee, S

    A. Chatterjee, S. Hussain, and K. Bhattacharya, Dynami- cal stability of the k-essence field interacting nonminimally with a perfect fluid, Phys. Rev. D104, 103505 (2021), arXiv:2105.00361 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  71. [71]

    Hussain, Non-adiabatic particle production scenario in al- gebraically coupled quintessence field with dark matter fluid, (2024), arXiv:2403.10215 [gr-qc]

    S. Hussain, Particle production scenario in an algebraically coupled quintessence field with a dark matter fluid, Chin. J. Phys.97, 673 (2025), arXiv:2403.10215 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, IN- TEGRAL), Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Bi- nary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A, Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L13 (2017), arXiv:1710.05834 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [73]

    J. J. Terente D ´ıaz, K. Dimopoulos, M. Kar ˇciauskas, and A. Racioppi, Gauss-Bonnet Dark Energy and the speed of gravitational waves, JCAP10, 031, arXiv:2307.06163 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  74. [74]

    J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalac ´arregui, Dark Energy After GW170817: Dead Ends and the Road Ahead, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 251304 (2017), arXiv:1710.05901 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    Cicoli, J

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo, and I. Zavala, String cosmology: From the early universe to today, Phys. Rept.1059, 1 (2024), arXiv:2303.04819 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    P. G. S. Fernandes, P. Carrilho, T. Clifton, and D. J. Mulryne, The 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet theory of gravity: a review, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 063001 (2022), arXiv:2202.13908 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    S. M. R. Micheletti, Holographic field theory models of dark energy in interaction with dark matter, Phys. Rev. D85, 123536 (2012), arXiv:1009.6198 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  78. [78]

    McDonough, M.-X

    E. McDonough, M.-X. Lin, J. C. Hill, W. Hu, and S. Zhou, Early dark sector, the Hubble tension, and the swampland, Phys. Rev. D106, 043525 (2022), arXiv:2112.09128 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  79. [79]

    S. Lepe, J. Lorca, F. Pena, and Y. Vasquez, Fermionic and scalar fields as sources of interacting dark matter-dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D20, 2543 (2011), arXiv:1109.0559 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  80. [80]

    Cosmological implications of a Dark Matter self-interaction energy density

    R. Stiele, T. Boeckel, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Cosmologi- cal implications of a Dark Matter self-interaction energy den- sity, Phys. Rev. D81, 123513 (2010), arXiv:1003.2304 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.