Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Weather Jiu-Jitsu: Climate Adaptation for the 21st Century

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Weather Jiu-Jitsu proposes using atmospheric chaos to steer extreme weather away from disasters.

desk verdict A coherent and honest research agenda for weather control via chaos, but the central feasibility inference is a leap the paper doesn't try to bridge. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09376 v1 pith:VKGPZ6LX submitted 2025-08-12 physics.ao-ph

Qin Huang , Moyan Liu , Upmanu Lall This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ao-ph
keywords weatherjiu-jitsuchaoscontrolextremeatmosphericcirculationclimateadaptationadaptivemodificationrivers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the same property of the atmosphere that makes weather hard to predict—sensitivity to tiny disturbances—can be turned into a strategy for reducing disasters. 'Weather Jiu-Jitsu' would apply small, precisely timed, low-energy nudges to mid-latitude circulation so that natural dynamics amplify the effect and steer hurricanes, atmospheric rivers, or blocking patterns away from harmful outcomes. The paper builds the case by showing that chaotic control is already feasible in the low-order models that capture these phenomena, and that the traditional trio of dams, insurance, and early warnings is structurally overwhelmed by catastrophic events. The authors present the idea as an urgent research agenda, with the physical delivery of the perturbation explicitly left as an open problem.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is adaptive chaos control: repeatedly estimate the atmospheric state through data assimilation, identify where disturbances grow fastest using Lyapunov exponents, and apply small nudges via model predictive control to shift the trajectory toward a desired basin of attraction. The paper uses the L84 model—a low-order idealization of jet-stream and eddy interaction—as the conceptual bridge between toy-model control and real mid-latitude weather extremes, and treats deep-learning emulators of the full atmosphere as the operational path to real-time control.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be a systematic hindcast search over many past extremes (e.g., two dozen Atlantic hurricane landfalls and atmospheric-river flood weeks) using a high-resolution weather model or deep-learning emulator: compute the smallest initial-condition perturbation that changes the event's impact. If no perturbation below a fixed energy budget (say, less than 0.1% of the event's domain-integrated kinetic energy) succeeds in a substantial fraction of cases, the premise fails. The search would also be falsified if successful redirections consistently create comparable or larger extreme

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the chaos that caps weather predictability is also a control handle. Because mid-latitude circulation possesses multiple coexisting regimes and is exponentially sensitive to small disturbances, well-timed, low-energy nudges can be amplified by the atmosphere's own dynamics and push a storm track, an atmospheric river, or a blocking pattern into a less destructive state. The authors propose two control settings: targeted nudges while an extreme event is developing, and regular sub-seasonal nudges that reduce the probability of undesirable circulation regimes. They argue the most tractable targets are jet-stream-mediated phenomena—hurricane steering, atmospher

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that controllability shown in idealized low-order models transfers to the real, high-dimensional, moist atmosphere—i.e., that a small, well-timed energy input can reliably redirect a specific weather system without causing comparable adverse effects elsewhere.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the thesis holds, the costliest tail of disaster risk—hurricane landfalls, atmospheric-river floods, and persistent blocking-related heat waves—could be reduced with far smaller energy inputs than building or retrofitting hard infrastructure everywhere.
  • The same rapidly improving machine-learning weather models that now rival physics-based forecasts could serve as the control emulators, making an operational prototype testable before physical delivery systems exist.
  • Adaptive nudging would give insurance systems a way to shrink the catastrophic losses that currently bankrupt pools like the U.S. flood program, since the rare cluster events would be the primary targets.
  • Success would create a second, independent rationale for investing in dense atmospheric observation and data assimilation: not just prediction, but control.
  • Because extremes will persist even after deep decarbonization, this approach would be useful regardless of how the greenhouse-gas trajectory unfolds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: a low-cost first test does not require physically perturbing the atmosphere: in reanalysis or ensemble hindcasts of past extreme events, one can search for initial-condition perturbations below a chosen energy threshold that change the outcome, using existing deep-learning weather emulators.
  • Editorial extension: the paper leaves the delivery problem open, but the control problem and the delivery problem can be separated; optimal perturbation locations from adjoint or sensitivity methods could be validated in regional models years before any laser, seeding, or heating technology is deployed.
  • Editorial extension: if block entry/exit transitions are indeed the high-instability windows, Weather Jiu-Jitsu becomes a circulation-regime management tool, changing the probability of a whole class of extremes rather than single storms—which would raise transboundary governance questions the paper only flags.
  • Editorial extension: a natural next step is to compute, for historical catastrophes, the minimal perturbation energy needed to shift the outcome; those numbers would indicate whether the approach is energetically plausible or confined to idealizations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper argues that conventional climate risk management—physical infrastructure, insurance, and early warning—cannot scale to handle catastrophic weather extremes, and proposes a new adaptive strategy called "Weather Jiu-Jitsu." The idea is to exploit atmospheric chaos: small, precisely timed and placed energy perturbations could be amplified by intrinsic instabilities to steer specific weather systems (hurricanes, atmospheric rivers, blocking patterns) away from destructive trajectories. The argument is built on (i) the well-known sensitivity of the atmosphere to initial conditions, (ii) chaos-control results in the Lorenz 63 and Lorenz 84 toy models, (iii) recent ML-based weather prediction, and (iv) a conceptual GFS-based illustration of an atmospheric river. The authors explicitly identify the delivery mechanism as an open challenge and list open technical questions, but nevertheless assert that sensitivity to initial conditions "implies" steerability toward desirable regimes. The manuscript is written as a perspective/agenda piece rather than a quantitative feasibility study.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the paper would outline a transformative approach to disaster risk reduction: a low-energy, nature-assisted infrastructure for steering weather extremes. The manuscript usefully synthesizes the limitations of existing infrastructure, insurance, and geoengineering approaches, and it points to a concrete research program with identifiable milestones. It also honestly acknowledges several open problems. However, the load-bearing inference—from chaotic sensitivity to practical controllability of synoptic-scale weather—is not supported by quantitative evidence or a mechanistic argument. The value of the paper at present is primarily agenda-setting: it poses an important question and sketches a plausible route, but it does not yet demonstrate that the route is physically viable. This should be reflected in the framing and in the strength of the claims made.

major comments (4)
  1. ["Toward Weather Jiu-Jitsu" (pp. 13–18)] The central claim is the sentence "sensitivity to initial conditions also implies that small, well-timed perturbations may be able to steer the atmosphere toward desirable regimes." This is a logical leap: chaos implies divergence of nearby trajectories, not controllability to a specified desirable regime in a high-dimensional, moist, forced-dissipative atmosphere. The paper itself lists this as open question (a) and later states the delivery problem is "an open challenge." The manuscript should either replace "implies" with a clearly labeled hypothesis or provide a quantitative plausibility argument (e.g., scaling of required perturbation energy versus available instability growth, or results from an intermediate-complexity atmospheric model). This is the load-bearing point for the entire proposal.
  2. [Ref. 79 (p. 28)] The key supporting result for L84 adaptive chaos control is reference 79, described as "Submitted to Geophys. Res. Lett. (in review, 2025)." Readers cannot verify this result, and the paper's argument depends on it. The authors should either cite published, peer-reviewed chaos-control studies for L84/L63, or include the essential numerical results in the manuscript (e.g., in supplementary material) so that the claim is independently checkable.
  3. [Figure 1 (pp. 14–15)] Figure 1 is labeled a "Conceptual illustration" and is described as "Adapted from NOAA Global Forecast System (GFS) model output." No details are given about the nudges, their amplitude, the model configuration, or how the perturbed trajectory was produced. If this figure is intended as evidence of feasibility, the experimental setup must be described (including perturbation energies relative to natural variability, control runs, and a comparison with an unperturbed forecast). If it is only illustrative, the caption should state explicitly that it does not constitute a simulation result.
  4. [Final paragraph before References (p. 19)] The statement "Direct impacts will be restricted to the event's time scale" is an unsupported overclaim. Because the atmosphere is chaotic and teleconnections are widespread, a localized nudge of a jet-stream wave or blocking pattern can have nonlocal and delayed effects. The manuscript acknowledges the possibility of adverse impacts only vaguely. This statement should be tempered or supported by an analysis of remote response and unintended consequences, especially in a paper whose central mechanism is chaos amplification.
minor comments (3)
  1. [General] The spelling of the proposed term is inconsistent: "Weather Jiu-Jitsu" (title, abstract) and "Weather Jiu Jitsu" (main text, e.g., pp. 3, 6). Please standardize.
  2. [References] Several references are in-press or preprint (e.g., refs. 51, 52, 79). For a perspective piece this is acceptable, but the authors should mark them clearly and, where possible, update to published versions.
  3. [Supplementary material] Supplementary Figures 1–5 and Supplementary Video 1 are cited in the text but were not included in the manuscript provided for review. Please ensure these are available and that their content is summarized in the caption or main text, since some are used to support factual claims about exposure and circulation patterns.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

One load-bearing self-citation (ref 79) supports the L84 controllability step; otherwise the proposal rests on independent chaos-control literature and explicit open questions, so circularity is modest.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 'Toward Weather Jiu-Jitsu', paragraph on L63/L84; Reference 79]
    "Similar results are being achieved for L84, which has a more complex attractor79. [Ref. 79: Liu, M., Huang, Q. & Lall, U. Adaptive chaos control of the weather: exploring “Weather Jiu-Jitsu” in idealized models. Submitted to Geophys. Res. Lett. (in review, 2025).]"

    This is the only cited support for the claim that L84—the model the paper invokes as the idealized analog of mid-latitude jet–eddy dynamics—can be adaptively controlled. The citation is an unreviewed submitted manuscript by the same three authors, so the load-bearing transfer from toy models to a jet-stream-like system is not independently checkable. It is not a rename or a fit, but it is a self-citation doing load-bearing work for the feasibility claim. The rest of the control evidence (L63, general chaos control) is independent, and the paper openly labels the delivery problem an open challenge, so this is partial rather than total circularity.

full rationale

This is a perspective/proposal paper rather than a derivation chain with fitted parameters or predictions. The central inference—that sensitivity to initial conditions implies small, well-timed perturbations can steer the real atmosphere toward desirable regimes—is a logical/empirical leap, but it is not a circular reduction: no equation defines the conclusion into the premise, and no fitted quantity is later called a prediction. The main circularity-adjacent element is that the L84 controllability result, which is the closest toy-model analog to the mid-latitude jet–eddy dynamics the paper targets, is supported only by the authors' own in-review manuscript (ref 79). That self-citation is load-bearing for the transfer argument. However, independent published work on controlling L63 (refs 71–78) and general chaos control (refs 99–100) provides external grounding for the core idea, and the manuscript itself explicitly lists the key technical questions as open, labels the delivery challenge 'an open challenge,' and describes Figure 1 as a 'Conceptual illustration' adapted from GFS output rather than a simulation result. These self-imposed caveats reduce the appearance of overclaiming. Score 4 reflects one load-bearing self-citation with substantial independent content; it does not rise to the level of a derivation that reduces by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on unproven assumptions about the transferability of chaos control from toy models to the real atmosphere, the physical delivery of nudges, and the real-time observability/controllability of weather systems. No free parameters are fit, and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Mid-latitude atmospheric circulation is a chaotic dynamical system controllable by small perturbations in the same way as L63/L84 toy models.
    The paper extrapolates controllability from toy models to the real atmosphere without evidence; invoked throughout 'Toward Weather Jiu-Jitsu'.
  • ad hoc to paper Sensitivity to initial conditions implies steerability toward desirable regimes.
    Chaotic sensitivity guarantees divergence, not that a desired target basin can be reached with small energy; this is a logical leap used as the foundation of the proposal.
  • domain assumption Small-energy perturbations can be physically delivered at the right time and location with sufficient accuracy.
    The 'practical challenge' section admits this is an open challenge; the entire proposal rests on it.
  • domain assumption The atmosphere's state can be observed and predicted well enough for adaptive control at multi-day scales.
    The paper relies on advances in deep learning weather prediction, but adaptive control requires real-time state estimation and reliable prediction, which is not guaranteed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Weather Jiu-Jitsu: Climate Adaptation for the 21st Century." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VKGPZ6LX

@misc{pith2026250809376,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Weather Jiu-Jitsu: Climate Adaptation for the 21st Century},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VKGPZ6LX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09376}
}
read the original abstract

Extreme climate events, e.g., droughts, floods, heat waves, and freezes, are becoming more frequent and intense with severe global socio-economic impacts. Growing populations and economic activity leads to increased exposure to these events. Scaling existing physical, financial, and social infrastructure to provide resilience against these extreme events is daunting, especially as one ponders projected climate changes. Climate extremes pose a challenge even if decarbonization and geoengineering are able to regulate Earth's radiation balance. We argue that there is an urgent need to explore a novel adaptive strategy that we call "Weather Jiu-Jitsu," which leverages the intrinsic chaotic dynamics of weather systems to subtly redirect or dissipate their destructive trajectories through precisely timed, small-energy interventions. By leveraging insights from adaptive chaos control, combined with improved observations, prediction and low-energy weather system interventions, humanity could develop a novel nature assisted global infrastructure to limit the impact of climate extremes in the 21st century.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.09376 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Conceptual illustration of an intense atmospheric river (AR) event [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Real-Time Remote-Sensing-Guided Decision-Support Framework for Cloud-Seeding Operations: A Field Demonstration Using Himawari-9 and C-band Phased Array Weather Radar

    physics.ao-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    High-frequency Himawari-9 and C-PAWR observations enabled real-time selection and aircraft guidance to seed a ~20-minute cumulus cloud over Toyama Bay before natural dissipation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R., Skoggard, I., Felzer, B., Pitek, E

    Ember, C. R., Skoggard, I., Felzer, B., Pitek, E. & Jiang, M. Climate variability, drought, and the belief that high gods are associated with weather in nonindustrial societies. Weather Clim. Soc. 13, 259–272 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    & Coumou, D

    Robinson, A., Lehmann, J., Barriopedro, D., Rahmstorf, S. & Coumou, D. Increasing heat and rainfall extremes now far outside the historical climate. npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. 4, 45 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Pradhan, P., Seydewitz, T., Zhou, B., Lüdeke, M. K. B. & Kropp, J. P. Climate extremes are becoming more frequent, co-occurring, and persistent in Europe. Anthr. Sci. 1, 264– 277 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Natural Catastrophe and Climate Report: 2024 (2024)

    Gallagher Re. Natural Catastrophe and Climate Report: 2024 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    WMO Atlas of Mortality and Economic Losses from Weather, Climate and Water Extremes (1970–2019) WMO-No

    World Meteorological Organization. WMO Atlas of Mortality and Economic Losses from Weather, Climate and Water Extremes (1970–2019) WMO-No. 1267 (WMO, 2021)

    1970

  6. [6]

    Biella, R. et al. The 2022 drought shows the importance of preparedness in European drought risk management. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2073 (2024)

    work page doi:10.5194/egusphere-2024-2073 2022

  7. [7]

    C., Maron, M

    Lee, C. C., Maron, M. & Mostafavi, A. Community-scale big data reveals disparate impacts of the Texas winter storm of 2021 and its managed power outage. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 335 (2022)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Multi-year drought and heat waves across Mexico in 2024

    Thiem, H. Multi-year drought and heat waves across Mexico in 2024. Climate.gov https://www.climate.gov/news-features/event-tracker/multi-year-drought-and-heat- waves-across-mexico-2024 (2024). 21

    2024

Show all 100 references
  1. [9]

    P., Jubaer, A., Islam, S

    Chakraborty, D., Mondal, K. P., Jubaer, A., Islam, S. T. & Talukder, B. Health impacts of rapid-onset event: 2022 flash flood in Bangladesh. In Living with Climate Change 199– 212 (Elsevier, 2024)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Zscheischler, J. et al. A typology of compound weather and climate events. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 333–347 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Duan, W. et al. Floods and associated socioeconomic damages in China over the last century. Nat. Hazards 82, 401–413 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Dettinger, M. D. et al. Design and quantification of an extreme winter storm scenario for emergency preparedness and planning exercises in California. Nat. Hazards 60, 1085– 1111 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Porter, K. et al. Overview of the ARkStorm Scenario. US Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1312, 183 pp. (USGS, 2011). http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2010/1312/

    2010

  6. [14]

    S., Rose, A

    Wing, I. S., Rose, A. Z. & Wein, A. M. Economic Consequence Analysis of the ARkStorm Scenario. Natural Hazards Review 17, A4015002 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Hirabayashi, Y. et al. Global flood risk under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 816– 821 (2013)

    2013

  8. [16]

    & Webb, R

    Collier, M. & Webb, R. H. Floods, Droughts, and Climate Change (Univ. of Arizona Press, 2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv23khmnb

    2002 doi

  9. [17]

    & Gao, J

    Dong, S., Gao, X., Mostafavi, A. & Gao, J. Modest flooding can trigger catastrophic road network collapse due to compound failure. Commun. Earth Environ. 3, 38 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    & Kawasaki, A

    Vin, L. & Kawasaki, A. Do floods widen the economic disparity gap? Prog. Disaster Sci. 24, 100362 (2024). 22

    2024

  11. [19]

    & Comes, T

    Fransen, S., Werntges, A., Hunns, A., Sirenko, M. & Comes, T. Refugee settlements are highly exposed to extreme weather conditions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2206189120 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Stendel, M., Francis, J., White, R., Williams, P. D. & Woollings, T. The jet stream and climate change. In Climate Change: Observed Impacts on Planet Earth 3rd edn, 327–357 (Elsevier, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821575-3.00015-3

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    Kautz, L.-A. et al. Atmospheric blocking and weather extremes over the Euro-Atlantic sector – a review. Weather Clim. Dynam. 3, 305–336 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    & Nayak, M

    Ul Hassan, W. & Nayak, M. A. Global teleconnections in droughts caused by oceanic and atmospheric circulation patterns. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 014007 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Lau, W. K. M. & Kim, K.-M. The 2010 Pakistan flood and Russian heat wave: teleconnection of hydrometeorological extremes. J. Hydrometeorol. 13, 392–403 (2012)

    2010

  16. [24]

    Hirschboeck, K. K. Catastrophic flooding and atmospheric circulation anomalies. In Catastrophic Flooding (1st edn) 34 pp. (Routledge, 1987). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003020325

    1987 doi

  17. [25]

    Nakamura, J., Lall, U., Kushnir, Y., Robertson, A. W. & Seager, R. Dynamical structure of extreme floods in the U.S. Midwest and the United Kingdom. J. Hydrometeorol. 14, 485–504 (2013)

    2013

  18. [26]

    & Wernli, H

    Knippertz, P. & Wernli, H. A Lagrangian climatology of tropical moisture exports to the Northern Hemispheric extratropics. J. Clim. 23, 987–1003 (2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    O’Brien, T. A. et al. Atmospheric rivers in the Eastern and Midwestern United States associated with baroclinic waves. Geophys. Res. Lett. 51, e2023GL107236 (2024). 23

    2024

  20. [28]

    Wang, S. et al. Extreme atmospheric rivers in a warming climate. Nat. Commun. 14, 3219 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability

    Tabari, H. Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability. Sci. Rep. 10, 13768 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Equations governing the energetics of the larger scales of atmospheric turbulence in the domain of wave number

    Saltzman, B. Equations governing the energetics of the larger scales of atmospheric turbulence in the domain of wave number. J. Meteorol. 14, 513–523 (1957)

    1957

  23. [31]

    On the maintenance of the large-scale quasi-permanent disturbances in the atmosphere

    Saltzman, B. On the maintenance of the large-scale quasi-permanent disturbances in the atmosphere. Tellus A 11, 63–74 (1959)

    1959

  24. [32]

    Lorenz, E. N. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130–141 (1963)

    1963

  25. [33]

    Lorenz, E. N. Irregularity: a fundamental property of the atmosphere. Tellus A 36A, 98– 110 (1984)

    1984

  26. [34]

    Hansen, A. R. & Sutera, A. A comparison of the spectral energy and enstrophy budgets of blocking versus nonblocking periods. Tellus A 36A, 52–63 (1984)

    1984

  27. [35]

    A., Oglesby, R

    Maasch, K. A., Oglesby, R. J. & Fournier, A. Barry Saltzman and the theory of climate. J. Clim. 18, 1073–1085 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    Lewis, J. M. & Lakshmivarahan, S. The Saltzman–Lorenz exchange in 1961: bridge to chaos theory. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 105, in press (2024)

    1961

  29. [37]

    Aemisegger, F. et al. How Rossby wave breaking modulates the water cycle in the North Atlantic trade wind region. Weather Clim. Dynam. 2, 281–309 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Ward, P. J. et al. A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 642–646 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    Mortensen, E. et al. The potential for various riverine flood DRR measures at the global scale. J. Coast. Riverine Flood Risk 1 (2023). 24

    2023

  32. [40]

    Nirandjan, S. et al. Review article: physical vulnerability database for critical infrastructure hazard risk assessments – a systematic review and data collection. Natural Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 24, 4341–4368 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Ho, M. et al. The future role of dams in the United States of America. Water Resour. Res. 53, 982–998 (2017)

    2017

  34. [42]

    & Curry, A

    Perera, D., Smakhtin, V., Williams, S., North, T. & Curry, A. Ageing water storage infrastructure: an emerging global risk. United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment and Health (2021). https://doi.org/10.53328/QSYL1281

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    K., Reddy, K

    Janga, J. K., Reddy, K. R. & Schulenberg, J. Climate change impacts on safety of levees: a review. In Geotechnical Engineering Challenges to Meet Current and Emerging Needs of Society 1669–1674 (CRC Press, London, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003431749-310

    2024 doi

  36. [44]

    & Lall, U

    Hwang, J. & Lall, U. Increasing dam failure risk in the USA due to compound rainfall clusters as climate changes. npj Nat. Hazards 1, 27 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Kreibich, H. et al. The challenge of unprecedented floods and droughts in risk management. Nature 608, 80–86 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Climate-proofing critical energy infrastructure: smart grids, artificial intelligence, and machine learning for power system resilience against extreme weather events

    Nyangon, J. Climate-proofing critical energy infrastructure: smart grids, artificial intelligence, and machine learning for power system resilience against extreme weather events. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 30, 03124001 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Kumar, P. et al. Urban heat mitigation by green and blue infrastructure: drivers, effectiveness, and future needs. Innov. 5, 100588 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    J., Lall, U

    Doss-Gollin, J., Farnham, D. J., Lall, U. & Modi, V. How unprecedented was the February 2021 Texas cold snap? Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 064056 (2021). 25

    2021

  41. [49]

    T., Wätzold, F., Hecker, L

    Kraehnert, K., Osberghaus, D., Hott, C., Habtemariam, L. T., Wätzold, F., Hecker, L. P. & Fluhrer, S. Insurance against extreme weather events: an overview. Rev. Econ. 72, 71– 95 (2021)

    2021

  42. [50]

    Flood insurance: from clients to global financial markets

    Kron, W. Flood insurance: from clients to global financial markets. J. Flood Risk Manag. 2, 68–75 (2009)

    2009

  43. [51]

    hyperclustering

    Nayak, A., Zhang, M., Gentine, P. & Lall, U. Catastrophic “hyperclustering” and recurrent losses: diagnosing U.S. flood insurance insolvency triggers. In press (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    & Lall, U

    Nayak, A., Gentine, P. & Lall, U. Financial losses associated with US floods occur with surprisingly frequent, low return period precipitation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6025742/v1 (2025)

    2025 doi

  45. [53]

    Shao, C., Yuan, X. & Ma, F. Skill decreases in real-time seasonal climate prediction due to decadal variability. Clim. Dyn. 61, 4203–4217 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    & Palmer, T

    Weisheimer, A. & Palmer, T. N. On the reliability of seasonal climate forecasts. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20131162 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    & Leutbecher, M

    Buizza, R. & Leutbecher, M. The forecast skill horizon. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 141, 3366–3382 (2015)

    2015

  48. [56]

    Sovacool, B. K. Reckless or righteous? Reviewing the sociotechnical benefits and risks of climate change geoengineering. Energy Strateg. Rev. 35, 100656 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    Energy Information Administration

    U.S. Energy Information Administration. U.S. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions, 2024 (EIA, 2025). https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/carbon/

    2024

  50. [58]

    Morrison, T. H. et al. Radical interventions for climate-impacted systems. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 1100–1106 (2022). 26

    2022

  51. [59]

    CCUS: a panacea or a placebo in the fight against climate change? Green Energy Environ

    Zhao, Y. CCUS: a panacea or a placebo in the fight against climate change? Green Energy Environ. 10, 239–243 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report

    IPCC. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Lee, H. & Romero, J. (eds.)] 184 pp. (IPCC, Geneva, 2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    G., Gentine, P., Seneviratne, S

    Miralles, D. G., Gentine, P., Seneviratne, S. I. & Teuling, A. J. Land–atmospheric feedbacks during droughts and heatwaves: state of the science and current challenges. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1436, 19–35 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    L., López-Zurita, C

    Blanusa, M. L., López-Zurita, C. J. & Rasp, S. Internal variability plays a dominant role in global climate projections of temperature and precipitation extremes. Clim. Dyn. 61, 1931–1945 (2023)

    1931

  55. [63]

    & Schrag, D

    Dagon, K. & Schrag, D. P. Regional climate variability under model simulations of solar geoengineering. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 12,106–12,121 (2017)

    2017

  56. [64]

    Irvine, P. et al. Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 295–299 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Baur, S., Nauels, A., Nicholls, Z., Sanderson, B. M. & Schleussner, C.-F. The deployment length of solar radiation modification: an interplay of mitigation, net- negative emissions and climate uncertainty. Earth Syst. Dynam. 14, 367–381 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance (National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2021)

    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research and Research Governance (National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2021). 27

    2021

  59. [67]

    & Watanabe, S

    Sugiyama, M., Asayama, S., Kosugi, T., Ishii, A. & Watanabe, S. Public attitude toward solar radiation modification: results of a two-scenario online survey on perception in four Asia–Pacific countries. Sustain. Sci. 20, 423–438 (2025)

    2025

  60. [68]

    Solar Radiation Modification (SAPEA, Berlin, 2024)

    SAPEA. Solar Radiation Modification (SAPEA, Berlin, 2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14283096

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    NOAA Global Forecast System (GFS)

    National Centers for Environmental Prediction. NOAA Global Forecast System (GFS). https://dynamical.org/catalog/noaa-gfs-forecast/ (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    Lorenz, E. N. Computational periodicity as observed in a simple system. Tellus A 58, 549–557 (2006)

    2006

  63. [71]

    & Yau, H.-T

    Yang, S.-K., Chen, C.-L. & Yau, H.-T. Control of chaos in Lorenz system. Chaos Solitons Fractals 13, 767–780 (2002)

    2002

  64. [72]

    & Veeresha, P

    Chakraborty, A. & Veeresha, P. Effects of global warming, time delay and chaos control on the dynamics of a chaotic atmospheric propagation model within the frame of Caputo fractional operator. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 128, 107657 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Matuszak, M., Röhrs, J., Isachsen, P. E. & Idžanović, M. Uncertainties in the finite-time Lyapunov exponent in an ocean ensemble prediction model. Ocean Sci. 21, 401–418 (2025)

    2025

  66. [74]

    Li, R. et al. Estimating the decadal-scale climate predictability limit using nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent with optimal local dynamic analogues. Clim. Dyn. 63, 85 (2025)

    2025

  67. [75]

    & Mengaldo, G

    Dong, C., Faranda, D., Gualandi, A., Lucarini, V. & Mengaldo, G. Revisiting the predictability of dynamical systems: a new local data-driven approach. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.14865 (2024). 28

    2024 doi arXiv

  68. [76]

    & Sun, Q

    Miyoshi, T. & Sun, Q. Control simulation experiment with Lorenz’s butterfly attractor. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 29, 133–139 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    & Kotsuki, S

    Kawasaki, F. & Kotsuki, S. Leading the Lorenz 63 system toward the prescribed regime by model predictive control coupled with data assimilation. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 31, 319–333 (2024)

    2024

  70. [78]

    Ensemble Kalman filter meets model predictive control in chaotic systems

    Sawada, Y. Ensemble Kalman filter meets model predictive control in chaotic systems. SOLA 20, 400–407 (2024)

    2024

  71. [79]

    Weather Jiu-Jitsu

    Liu, M., Huang, Q. & Lall, U. Adaptive chaos control of the weather: exploring “Weather Jiu-Jitsu” in idealized models. Submitted to Geophys. Res. Lett. (in review, 2025)

    2025

  72. [80]

    Low-Frequency Climate Variability: Inferences from Simple Models

    Jain, S. Low-Frequency Climate Variability: Inferences from Simple Models. M.S. thesis, Utah State Univ. (1998)

    1998

  73. [81]

    & Vitolo, R

    Broer, H., Simó, C. & Vitolo, R. Bifurcations and strange attractors in the Lorenz-84 climate model with seasonal forcing. Nonlinearity 15, 1205–1267 (2002)

    2002

  74. [82]

    & Lall, U

    Karamperidou, C., Cioffi, F. & Lall, U. Surface temperature gradients as diagnostic indicators of midlatitude circulation dynamics. J. Clim. 25, 4154–4171 (2012)

    2012

  75. [83]

    Goal 8: Controlling and modifying the weather | Moonshot R&D Program

    Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). Goal 8: Controlling and modifying the weather | Moonshot R&D Program. https://www.jst.go.jp/moonshot/en/program/goal8/index.html (accessed 2024)

    2024

  76. [84]

    E., Jorgensen, D

    Willoughby, H. E., Jorgensen, D. P., Black, R. A. & Rosenthal, S. L. Project STORMFURY: A Scientific Chronicle 1962–1983 (1985)

    1962

  77. [85]

    Sheets, R. C. Tropical cyclone modification: the Project Stormfury hypothesis. NOAA Tech. Rep. ERL 414 (Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, 1981). https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/11351/noaa_11351_DS1.pdf 29

    1981

  78. [86]

    Gentry, R. C. Project STORMFURY. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 50, 404–419 (1969)

    1969

  79. [87]

    Finocchio, P. M. & Doyle, J. D. How the speed and latitude of the jet stream affect the downstream response to recurving tropical cyclones. Mon. Weather Rev. 147, 3261–3281 (2019)

    2019

  80. [88]

    & Becker, T

    Becker, S. & Becker, T. The impact of changes in steering patterns on the probability of hurricanes making landfall in the New York City area. Int. J. Climatol. 43, 4590–4602 (2023)

    2023

  81. [89]

    A., Polvani, L

    Barnes, E. A., Polvani, L. M. & Sobel, A. H. Model projections of atmospheric steering of Sandy-like superstorms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15211–15215 (2013)

    2013

  82. [90]

    D., Brennan, M

    Torn, R. D., Brennan, M. J. & Dunion, J. P. Application of ensemble sensitivity for hurricane track forecast sensitivity and flight planning. Weather Forecast. 40, 411–424 (2025)

    2025

  83. [91]

    Colby, F. P. Jr, Barlow, M. & Penny, A. B. Steering flow sensitivity in forecast models for Hurricane Ian (2022). Weather Forecast. 39, 821–829 (2024)

    2022

  84. [92]

    & Lucarini, V

    Schubert, S. & Lucarini, V. Dynamical analysis of blocking events: spatial and temporal fluctuations of covariant Lyapunov vectors. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 142, 2143–2158 (2016)

    2016

  85. [93]

    & Gritsun, A

    Lucarini, V. & Gritsun, A. A new mathematical framework for atmospheric blocking events. Clim. Dyn. 54, 575–598 (2020)

    2020

  86. [94]

    & Yiou, P

    Faranda, D., Messori, G. & Yiou, P. Dynamical proxies of North Atlantic predictability and extremes. Sci. Rep. 7, 41278 (2017)

    2017

  87. [95]

    Lai, C.-Y. et al. Machine learning for climate physics and simulations. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 16, 343–365 (2025). 30

    2025

  88. [96]

    Zhang, L., Zhao, Y., Cen, Y. & Lu, M. Deep learning-based precipitation simulation for tropical cyclones, mesoscale convective systems, and atmospheric rivers in East Asia. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 129, e2024JD041914 (2024)

    2024

  89. [97]

    & Qin, X

    Mu, B., Qin, B., Yuan, S. & Qin, X. A climate downscaling deep learning model considering the multiscale spatial correlations and chaos of meteorological events. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 7897824 (2020)

    2020

  90. [98]

    Houard, A. et al. Laser-guided lightning. Nat. Photon. 17, 231–235 (2023)

    2023

  91. [99]

    & Schuster, H

    Schöll, E. & Schuster, H. G. Handbook of Chaos Control (Wiley-VCH, 2008)

    2008

  92. [100]

    & Maza, D

    Boccaletti, S., Grebogi, C., Lai, Y.-C., Mancini, H. & Maza, D. The control of chaos: theory and applications. Phys. Rep. 329, 103–197 (2000)

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.