Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 62 references

EVOSCAT: Exploring Software Change Dynamics in Large-Scale Historical Datasets

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes EvoScat, a density-scatterplot tool meant to compress millions of software change events from open-source repositories into one visualization for comparing artifact aging and change pace; the supplied full text, however,

desk verdict The submitted PDF is a graphene physics paper, not the EvoScat software paper; as submitted, it is un-reviewable. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10852 v1 pith:BULTW3BR submitted 2025-08-14 cs.SE

Souhaila Serbout , Diana Carolina Muñoz Hurtado , Hassan Atwi , Edoardo Riggio , Cesare Pautasso This is my paper
classification cs.SE
keywords EvoScatsoftwareevolutiondensityscatterplottemporalscalabilityopen-sourcerepositoriesartifactaginginteractivevisualizationhistoricaldatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes EvoScat, an interactive density-scatterplot tool intended to compress millions of software change events mined from open-source repositories into a single global visualization. It argues that configurable history scaling, time alignment, artifact sorting, and interactive color mapping let researchers compare how quickly artifacts age, whether associated metrics improve or worsen, and how change pace differs across projects. The abstract promises a gallery of datasets covering OpenAPI descriptions and GitHub workflow definitions, along with deep dives into specific popular projects. However, the full text supplied with this submission is an unrelated experimental physics paper on UV-tunable hydrodynamic transport in graphene, so the EvoScat claims are not actually backed by any body text.

What carries the argument

The central object is the density scatterplot: time on one axis, artifacts on the other, with point density encoding event counts. The work it is meant to do is to summarize a million-event dataset as aggregated density cells rather than individual points, keeping the display readable while still allowing per-artifact comparisons through interactive color mapping, sorting, and axis alignment. In the supplied full text this object does not appear.

What would settle it

Take a repository with known commit times and render it in EvoScat at the density settings advertised for million-event data, then check whether a specific artifact's first and last commit and its metric trajectory can be read back exactly; failure at any but the most zoomed-in setting would falsify the single-view promise. A simpler check is text matching between the abstract and the body, which already fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In its abstract, the paper claims that EvoScat can render datasets with millions of change events and tens of thousands of artifacts in a single interactive density scatterplot, preserving enough temporal detail to support comparisons of artifact aging, metric trends, and pace of change. The intended mechanism is to aggregate events into density cells, with configuration knobs such as history scaling, time alignment, artifact sorting, and color mapping tailored to analyses like clone detection and freshness assessment. The supplied full text, however, presents a completely different study: dynamically tunable hydrodynamic transport in boron nitride-encapsulated graphene. It contains no EvoSc

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the premise that a density scatterplot whose cells store only aggregated event counts still preserves enough per-artifact temporal information to support the promised comparisons; a second, review-level premise is that the abstract and the full text describe the same work, which the supplied text contradicts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Researchers could compare the pace of change across thousands of artifacts in a single view, spotting clones or stale artifacts by their density patterns.
  • History scaling and time alignment would allow cross-project comparisons despite different project lifespans and commit cadences.
  • Color mapping a quantitative metric onto density would combine temporal overview with trend information, supporting one-glance freshness and worsening assessments.
  • At million-event scale, analysts could locate outliers and anomalies without first computing per-file aggregate statistics.
  • A faithful EvoScat paper would provide a reproducibility baseline; with the current full-text mismatch, no such baseline is available.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If EvoScat were implemented as described, the density-cell aggregation would almost certainly need to be paired with a drill-down or tooltip that recovers individual events, since human perception of density cannot distinguish tens from hundreds of co-located points; the paper likely leaves this interaction implicit.
  • A concrete test of the scalability promise would be to render a known trillion-revision repository and check whether the axes remain responsive under repeated filtering; that test is absent from the supplied material.
  • Even if the tool works as intended, the single-view promise trades away per-event identity, so questions like 'which exact commit changed this artifact in 2023' would require a second query; the abstract does not specify how such details are recovered.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as supplied, proposes EvoScat, an interactive density-scatterplot tool intended to provide a global, scalable overview of large historical datasets mined from open-source software repositories. The abstract claims that EvoScat supports flexible configuration for time-axis scaling/alignment, artifact sorting, and color mapping, enabling analysis of millions of events across tens of thousands of artifacts, and that the paper includes a gallery for OpenAPI descriptions and GitHub workflow definitions. However, the entire full-text body of the submission is arXiv:2508.10846v2, 'Dynamically tunable hydrodynamic transport in boron nitride-encapsulated graphene' by Gugnani et al. This body contains no mention of EvoScat, software repositories, datasets, scatterplots, or any software-engineering content. There is no implementation description, no algorithm specification, no evaluation, and no data analysis for the claimed tool. The submission therefore provides an abstract alone, with no assessable technical content.

Significance. If the claimed tool were actually described and evaluated, an interactive density-scatterplot for million-event software evolution datasets could be a useful contribution to empirical software engineering visualization. The abstract's proposed features—history scaling, time alignment, artifact sorting, interactive color mapping—are plausible and potentially valuable for comparing pace of change, clone detection, and freshness assessment. However, none of these claims is supported by any content in the submitted manuscript. There is no implementation, no machine-checked proof, no reproducible code artifact, no benchmark, no baseline comparison, and no measured scalability limit. Because the full text is an unrelated physics preprint, the contribution cannot be assessed for correctness, novelty, or reproducibility. The significance of the work is therefore unverifiable from the supplied material.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (entire manuscript body)] The full text of the submission is arXiv:2508.10846v2, 'Dynamically tunable hydrodynamic transport in boron nitride-encapsulated graphene', by Gugnani, Majumdar, Watanabe, Taniguchi, and Ghosh. This body is entirely unrelated to EvoScat: it contains no mention of software repositories, historical datasets, density scatterplots, OpenAPI descriptions, GitHub workflows, or any empirical software engineering content. The central claim of the abstract is therefore completely unsupported by the manuscript body. This is a load-bearing error: the submitted paper is not the paper described in the abstract.
  2. [Abstract (first paragraph)] The abstract states that EvoScat 'attempts addressing temporal scalability' through an interactive density scatterplot, and that the paper shows how the tool can be tailored to specific analysis needs. Even taken on its own terms, this is a proposal with no accompanying evidence. There is no description of the density-scatterplot aggregation method, no argument that the representation preserves per-artifact temporal information such as change times, aging, or metric improvement/worsening, and no evaluation of scalability at the claimed million-event/tens-of-thousands-of-artifacts scale. The absence of the full text means no such evidence exists to be checked.
  3. [Abstract (gallery claim)] The abstract promises 'a gallery showcasing datasets gathering specific artifacts (OpenAPI descriptions, GitHub workflow definitions) across multiple repositories, as well as diving into the history of specific popular open source projects.' No such gallery, figures, tables, or datasets appear anywhere in the supplied full text. This missing evaluation content is essential to the paper's claim that the tool is usable for the stated purposes, and its absence cannot be repaired by minor edits.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, sentence 4] Typographical issues: 'EvoScat intents to provide' should be 'EvoScat intends to provide'; 'a mean to produce' should be 'a means to produce'. Also, 'the history of specific popular open source projects' is somewhat informal for a journal style.
  2. [Abstract, sentence 5] The phrase 'attempts addressing' is vague; if the tool is presented as a proposal, the abstract should state what has actually been implemented and tested. The hedging language undermines the strength of the claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified; the EvoScat abstract makes no derivational prediction that reduces to its inputs, and the supplied full text (a graphene transport paper) does not provide the EvoScat derivation at all.

full rationale

The circularity pass checks whether a claimed prediction or first-principles result is equivalent to its inputs by construction. The EvoScat abstract makes no such claim: it proposes an interactive density-scatterplot tool, states that it 'attempts addressing temporal scalability,' and promises a gallery of datasets. There is no fitted parameter, no uniqueness theorem, no self-citation chain, and no equation whose output is its own input. The supplied full text is a completely different manuscript on UV-tunable hydrodynamic transport in hBN-encapsulated graphene (arXiv:2508.10846v2). Its equations (Eqs. 1-4) are physical transport models and fits used to analyze measured data; they are not used to derive EvoScat and cannot make the abstract's claim circular. The abstract/body mismatch is a serious completeness and integrity issue (the EvoScat implementation, algorithm, and evaluation are missing), but absence of evidence is not circularity under the stated rules. No specific reduction can be quoted, so the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract was available for analysis of EvoScat; the full text is a different manuscript and contributes nothing to the tool's premises. No free parameters are visible because the abstract contains no fitted or hand-chosen numerical constants. Axioms are limited to the domain assumptions embedded in the stated purpose of the tool. EvoScat is a proposed software artifact, not a postulated physical or mathematical entity, so no invented entities are listed.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption An interactive density scatterplot can represent millions of change events in a single view while preserving enough temporal and per-artifact structure to support comparison.
    Stated in the abstract as the core mechanism ('density scatterplot to provide a global overview'); no defense, complexity analysis, or evaluation is available in the supplied material because the full text is a different paper.
  • domain assumption Event histories mined from open source repositories are accurate and complete enough to support pace-of-change, clone detection, and freshness analyses.
    Implicit in the abstract's promise to analyze datasets of millions of events mined from open source repositories; the mining pipeline and its validation are not described anywhere in the available text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EVOSCAT: Exploring Software Change Dynamics in Large-Scale Historical Datasets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BULTW3BR

@misc{pith2026250810852,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EVOSCAT: Exploring Software Change Dynamics in Large-Scale Historical Datasets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BULTW3BR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10852}
}
read the original abstract

Long lived software projects encompass a large number of artifacts, which undergo many revisions throughout their history. Empirical software engineering researchers studying software evolution gather and collect datasets with millions of events, representing changes introduced to specific artifacts. In this paper, we propose EvoScat, a tool that attempts addressing temporal scalability through the usage of interactive density scatterplot to provide a global overview of large historical datasets mined from open source repositories in a single visualization. EvoScat intents to provide researchers with a mean to produce scalable visualizations that can help them explore and characterize evolution datasets, as well as comparing the histories of individual artifacts, both in terms of 1) observing how rapidly different artifacts age over multiple-year-long time spans 2) how often metrics associated with each artifacts tend towards an improvement or worsening. The paper shows how the tool can be tailored to specific analysis needs (pace of change comparison, clone detection, freshness assessment) thanks to its support for flexible configuration of history scaling and alignment along the time axis, artifacts sorting and interactive color mapping, enabling the analysis of millions of events obtained by mining the histories of tens of thousands of software artifacts. We include in this paper a gallery showcasing datasets gathering specific artifacts (OpenAPI descriptions, GitHub workflow definitions) across multiple repositories, as well as diving into the history of specific popular open source projects.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    alongside localised charge puddles within the hBN layer [36˘38] (shown in Fig. 1b as Process- 3), resulting in a decrease in carrier mobility ( ) of the channel (See Sup- plementary Section S4-c and S4-d) by almost an order of magnitude - from 2 m2 V1 s1 to 0:3 m2 V1 s1 as VPD is swept from 0 V to 70 V. Additionally, in both forward and backwards gate vol...

    work page

  2. [5]

    Gallagher, C.-S

    P. Gallagher, C.-S. Yang, T. Lyu, F. Tian, R. Kou, H. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and F. Wang, Quantum-critical conductivity of the Dirac uid in graphene, Science 364, 158 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [6]

    M. J. Ku, T. X. Zhou, Q. Li, Y. J. Shin, J. K. Shi, C. Burch, L. E. Anderson, A. T. Pierce, Y. Xie, A. Hamo, et al., Imaging viscous ow of the Dirac uid in graphene, Nature 583, 537 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [7]

    U. Vool, A. Hamo, G. Varnavides, Y. Wang, T. X. Zhou, N. Kumar, Y. Dovzhenko, Z. Qiu, C. A. Garcia, A. T. Pierce, et al. , Imaging phonon-mediated hydrodynamic ow in WTe 2, Nat. Phys. 17, 1216 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [8]

    J. A. Sulpizio, L. Ella, A. Rozen, J. Birkbeck, D. J. Perello, D. Dutta, M. Ben-Shalom, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, T. Holder, et al. , Visualizing Poiseuille ow of hydrodynamic electrons, Nature 576, 75 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [9]

    Bandurin, I

    D. Bandurin, I. Torre, R. K. Kumar, M. Ben Shalom, A. Tomadin, A. Principi, G. Auton, E. Khestanova, K. Novoselov, I. Grigorieva, et al. , Negative local resis- tance caused by viscous electron back ow in graphene, Science 351, 1055 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [10]

    Block, A

    A. Block, A. Principi, N. C. Hesp, A. W. Cummings, M. Liebel, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Roche, F. H. Koppens, N. F. van Hulst, et al. , Observation of giant and tunable thermal di usivity of a Dirac uid at room temperature, Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1195 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [11]

    S. Li, A. Andreev, and A. Levchenko, Hydrodynamic electron transport in graphene Hall-bar devices, Phys. Rev. B 105, 155307 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 62 references
  1. [12]

    A. I. Berdyugin, S. Xu, F. Pellegrino, R. Krishna Ku- mar, A. Principi, I. Torre, M. Ben Shalom, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, I. Grigorieva, et al., Measuring Hall viscos- ity of graphene’s electron uid, Science 364, 162 (2019)

    2019

  2. [13]

    Crossno, J

    J. Crossno, J. K. Shi, K. Wang, X. Liu, A. Harzheim, A. Lucas, S. Sachdev, P. Kim, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, et al. , Observation of the Dirac uid and the break- down of the Wiedemann-Franz law in graphene, Science 351, 1058 (2016)

    2016

  3. [14]

    M. L. Palm, C. Ding, W. S. Huxter, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and C. L. Degen, Observation of current whirlpools in graphene at room temperature, Science 384, 465 (2024)

    2024

  4. [15]

    Majumdar, N

    A. Majumdar, N. Chadha, P. Pal, A. Gugnani, B. Ghawri, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, S. Mukerjee, and A. Ghosh, Universality in quantum critical ow of charge and heat in ultra-clean graphene, Nat. Phys. (2025), [In Press]; preprint available at arXiv:2501.03193

    2025

  5. [16]

    Aharon-Steinberg, T

    A. Aharon-Steinberg, T. Völkl, A. Kaplan, A. K. Pariari, I. Roy, T. Holder, Y. Wolf, A. Y. Meltzer, Y. Myasoedov, M. E. Huber, et al. , Direct observation of vortices in an electron uid, Nature 607, 74 (2022)

    2022

  6. [17]

    Estrada-`lvarez, F

    J. Estrada-`lvarez, F. Domínguez-Adame, and E. Díaz, Alternative routes to electron hydrodynamics, Commun. Phys. 7, 138 (2024)

    2024

  7. [18]

    Q. Hong, M. Davydova, P. J. Ledwith, and L. Levitov, Superscreening by a retrore ected hole back ow in tomo- graphic electron uids, Phys. Rev. B 109, 085126 (2024)

    2024

  8. [19]

    Hofmann and S

    J. Hofmann and S. Das Sarma, Collective modes in inter- acting two-dimensional tomographic Fermi liquids, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205412 (2022)

    2022

  9. [20]

    Y. Zeng, H. Guo, O. M. Ghosh, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. S. Levitov, and C. R. Dean, Quantita- tive measurement of viscosity in two-dimensional electron uids, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05026 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [21]

    L. Wang, I. Meric, P. Huang, Q. Gao, Y. Gao, H. Tran, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, L. Campos, D. Muller, et al., One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material, Science 342, 614 (2013)

    2013

  11. [22]

    W. Wang, X. Ma, Z. Dai, S. Zhang, Y. Hou, G. Wang, Q. Li, Z. Zhang, Y. Wei, and L. Liu, Mechanical behavior of blisters spontaneously formed by multilayer 2D mate- rials, Adv. Mater. Int. 9, 2101939 (2022)

    2022

  12. [23]

    Y.-C. Lin, C. Jin, J.-C. Lee, S.-F. Jen, K. Suenaga, and P.-W. Chiu, Clean transfer of graphene for isolation and suspension, ACS Nano 5, 2362 (2011)

    2011

  13. [24]

    N. Xin, J. Lourembam, P. Kumaravadivel, A. Kazant- sev, Z. Wu, C. Mullan, J. Barrier, A. A. Geim, I. Grig- orieva, A. Mishchenko, et al. , Giant magnetoresistance of Dirac plasma in high-mobility graphene, Nature 616, 270 (2023)

    2023

  14. [25]

    Nam, D.-K

    Y. Nam, D.-K. Ki, D. Soler-Delgado, and A. F. Morpurgo, Electron hole collision limited transport in charge-neutral bilayer graphene, Nat. Phys. 13, 1207 (2017)

    2017

  15. [26]

    L. Jin, S. E. Zeltmann, H. S. Choe, H. Liu, F. I. Allen, A. M. Minor, and J. Wu, Disorder recovers the Wiedemann-Franz law in the metallic phase of VO 2, Phys. Rev. B 102, 041120 (2020)

    2020

  16. [27]

    Neumann, L

    C. Neumann, L. Rizzi, S. Reichardt, B. TerrØs, T. Khod- kov, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Beschoten, and C. Stampfer, Spatial control of Laser-Induced Doping Pro les in Graphene on Hexagonal Boron Nitride, ACS Appl. Mater. & Int. 8, 9377 (2016)

    2016

  17. [28]

    L. Ju, J. Velasco, E. Huang, S. Kahn, C. Nosiglia, H.-Z. Tsai, W. Yang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Zhang, et al. , Photoinduced doping in heterostruc- tures of graphene and boron nitride, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 348 (2014)

    2014

  18. [29]

    Z. Luo, N. J. Pinto, Y. Davila, and A. Charlie Johnson, Controlled doping of graphene using ultraviolet irradia- tion, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100 (2012)

    2012

  19. [30]

    K. Roy, M. Padmanabhan, S. Goswami, T. P. Sai, G. Ramalingam, S. Raghavan, and A. Ghosh, Graphene MoS2 hybrid structures for multifunctional photorespon- sive memory devices, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 826 (2013)

    2013

  20. [31]

    Quezada-Lopez, F

    E. Quezada-Lopez, F. Joucken, H. Chen, A. Lara, J. Dav- enport, K. Hellier, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Carter, A. Ramirez, et al. , Persistent and reversible electrostatic control of doping in graphene/hexagonal boron nitride heterostructures, Journ. of Appl. Phys. 127 (2020)

    2020

  21. [32]

    N. W. Ashcroft, N. D. Mermin, and S. Rodriguez, Solid state physics, American Journal of Physics 46, 116 (1978)

    1978

  22. [33]

    L. A. Ponomarenko, A. Principi, A. D. Niblett, W. Wang, R. V. Gorbachev, P. Kumaravadivel, A. I. Berdyugin, A. V. Ermakov, S. Slizovskiy, K. Watanabe, et al. , Extreme electron hole drag and negative mobility in the Dirac plasma of graphene, Nat. Commun. 15, 9869 (2024)

    2024

  23. [34]

    Cassabois, P

    G. Cassabois, P. Valvin, and B. Gil, Hexagonal boron ni- tride is an indirect bandgap semiconductor, Nat. Photon. 10, 262 (2016)

    2016

  24. [35]

    Ahmed, S

    T. Ahmed, S. Islam, T. Paul, N. Hariharan, S. Elizabeth, and A. Ghosh, A generic method to control hysteresis and memory e ect in van der waals hybrids, Mater. Res. Express 7, 014004 (2020)

    2020

  25. [36]

    Uddin, J

    M. Uddin, J. Li, J. Lin, and H. Jiang, Probing carbon im- purities in hexagonal boron nitride epilayers, Appl. Phys. 9 Lett. 110 (2017)

    2017

  26. [37]

    X. Du, J. Li, J. Lin, and H. Jiang, The origin of deep-level impurity transitions in hexagonal boron nitride, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106 (2015)

    2015

  27. [38]

    X. Du, J. Li, J. Lin, and H. Jiang, The origins of near band-edge transitions in hexagonal boron nitride epilay- ers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108 (2016)

    2016

  28. [39]

    A. Gao, E. Zoethout, J. M. Sturm, C. J. Lee, and F. Bi- jkerk, Defect formation in single layer graphene under extreme ultraviolet irradiation, Appl. Surf. Sci. 317, 745 (2014)

    2014

  29. [40]

    Xie and M

    H.-Y. Xie and M. S. Foster, Transport coe cients of graphene: Interplay of impurity scattering, Coulomb in- teraction, and optical phonons, Phys. Rev. B 93, 195103 (2016)

    2016

  30. [41]

    Ghahari, H.-Y

    F. Ghahari, H.-Y. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. S. Foster, and P. Kim, Enhanced thermoelectric power in graphene: Violation of the Mott relation by inelastic scat- tering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 136802 (2016)

    2016

  31. [42]

    Kaasbjerg, K

    K. Kaasbjerg, K. S. Thygesen, and K. W. Jacobsen, Unraveling the acoustic electron-phonon interaction in graphene, Phys. Rev. B Cond. Matt. and Mat. Phys. 85, 165440 (2012)

    2012

  32. [43]

    Perebeinos and P

    V. Perebeinos and P. A vouris, Inelastic scattering and current saturation in graphene, Phys. Rev. B Cond. Matt. and Mat. Phys. 81, 195442 (2010)

    2010

  33. [44]

    Hwang and S

    E. Hwang and S. Das Sarma, Acoustic phonon scatter- ing limited carrier mobility in two-dimensional extrinsic graphene, Phys. Rev. B 77, 115449 (2008)

    2008

  34. [45]

    K. I. Bolotin, K. J. Sikes, J. Hone, H. Stormer, and P. Kim, Temperature-dependent transport in suspended graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 096802 (2008)

    2008

  35. [46]

    D. K. Efetov and P. Kim, Controlling electron-phonon interactions in graphene at ultrahigh carrier densities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 256805 (2010)

    2010

  36. [47]

    Das Sarma, S

    S. Das Sarma, S. Adam, E. H. Hwang, and E. Rossi, Electronic transport in two-dimensional graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 407 (2011)

    2011

  37. [48]

    Sarkar, K

    S. Sarkar, K. R. Amin, R. Modak, A. Singh, S. Mukerjee, and A. Bid, Role of di erent scattering mechanisms on the temperature dependence of transport in graphene, Sci. Rep. 5, 16772 (2015)

    2015

  38. [49]

    J. H. Gosling, O. Makarovsky, F. Wang, N. D. Cottam, M. T. Greenaway, A. PatanŁ, R. D. Wildman, C. J. Tuck, L. Turyanska, and T. M. Fromhold, Universal mo- bility characteristics of graphene originating from charge scattering by ionised impurities, Commun. Phys. 4, 30 (2021)

    2021

  39. [50]

    Müller, J

    M. Müller, J. Schmalian, and L. Fritz, Graphene: A nearly perfect uid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 025301 (2009)

    2009

  40. [51]

    Principi and G

    A. Principi and G. Vignale, Violation of the Wiedemann Franz law in Hydrodynamic Electron Liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 056603 (2015)

    2015

  41. [52]

    Lucas and K

    A. Lucas and K. C. Fong, Hydrodynamics of electrons in graphene, Journ. of Phys.: Cond. Matt. 30, 053001 (2018)

    2018

  42. [53]

    S. Li, A. Levchenko, and A. Andreev, Hydrodynamic electron transport near charge neutrality, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075305 (2020)

    2020

  43. [54]

    Yudhistira, R

    I. Yudhistira, R. Afrose, and S. Adam, Nonmono- tonic temperature dependence of electron viscosity and crossover to high-temperature universal viscous uid in monolayer and bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 111, 085433 (2025)

    2025

  44. [55]

    Zarenia, A

    M. Zarenia, A. Principi, and G. Vignale, Disorder- enabled hydrodynamics of charge and heat transport in monolayer graphene, 2D Mater. 6, 035024 (2019)

    2019

  45. [56]

    Tu and S

    Y.-T. Tu and S. Das Sarma, Wiedemann-Franz law in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 107, 085401 (2023)

    2023

  46. [57]

    Lucas, J

    A. Lucas, J. Crossno, K. C. Fong, P. Kim, and S. Sachdev, Transport in inhomogeneous quantum criti- cal uids and in the Dirac uid in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 93, 075426 (2016)

    2016

  47. [58]

    H. Guo, E. Ilseven, G. Falkovich, and L. S. Levi- tov, Higher-than-ballistic conduction of viscous electron ows, PNAS 114, 3068 (2017)

    2017

  48. [59]

    Krishna Kumar, D

    R. Krishna Kumar, D. Bandurin, F. Pellegrino, Y. Cao, A. Principi, H. Guo, G. Auton, M. Ben Shalom, L. Pono- marenko, G. Falkovich, et al. , Superballistic ow of vis- cous electron uid through graphene constrictions, Nat. Phys. 13, 1182 (2017)

    2017

  49. [60]

    Chen and W

    W. Chen and W. Zhu, Viscosity of disordered Dirac elec- trons, Phys. Rev. B 106, 014205 (2022)

    2022

  50. [61]

    I. S. Burmistrov, M. Goldstein, M. Kot, V. D. Kurilovich, and P. D. Kurilovich, Dissipative and Hall viscosity of a disordered 2D electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 026804 (2019)

    2019

  51. [62]

    Davoudiniya, B

    M. Davoudiniya, B. Yang, and B. Sanyal, In uence of ab initio derived site-dependent hopping parameters on elec- tronic transport in graphene nanoribbons, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 26, 1936 (2024)

    1936

  52. [63]

    Talanov, J

    A. Talanov, J. Waissman, A. Hui, B. Skinner, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Kim, Observation of electronic viscous dissipation in graphene magneto-thermal trans- port, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.13799 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  53. [64]

    Principi, G

    A. Principi, G. Vignale, M. Carrega, and M. Polini, Bulk and shear viscosities of the two-dimensional electron liq- uid in a doped graphene sheet, Phys. Rev. B 93, 125410 (2016)

    2016

  54. [65]

    J. A. N. Bruin, H. Sakai, R. S. Perry, and A. Mackenzie, Similarity of scattering rates in metals showing T-linear resistivity, Science 339, 804 (2013). Dynamically tunable hydrodynamic transport in boron nitride-encapsulated graphene: (Supplementary Information) Akash Gugnani...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.