Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 126 references

Probes for String-Inspired Foam, Lorentz, and CPT Violations in Astrophysics

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The authors argue that a string-theory quantum foam made of D-particles—transparent to charged matter but refracting photons and neutrinos—can account for all current astrophysical hints of Planck-scale Lorentz and CPT violation while evadi

desk verdict A clearly-written review of the authors' own D-foam program, but the central 'unified framework' claim is a restatement of a fit, not an independent result. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11172 v1 pith:7OTX5TCR submitted 2025-08-15 hep-ph astro-ph.HEgr-qc

Chengyi Li , Bo-Qiang Ma This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phastro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords LorentzviolationCPTquantumgravitystringtheoryD-branefoamtime-of-flightlagsgammaraysneutrinos
topics Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish that one quantum-gravity mechanism—a 'D-foam' of D-particle defects in a brane world—accounts for all current astrophysical hints of Planck-scale Lorentz and CPT violation. From time-of-flight fits it adopts a subluminal photon law $v_\gamma(E)=1-E/E_{\rm LV}^{\gamma}$ with $E_{\rm LV}^{\gamma}\sim 3\times 10^{17}$ GeV, and a neutrino law at $E_{\rm LV}^{\nu}\sim 6.4\times 10^{17}$ GeV whose delayed and advanced events signal a neutrino–antineutrino asymmetry. The paper argues that the D-foam's specific properties—subluminal, polarization-blind photon refraction; photon stability; transparency to charged leptons; and foam-induced energy non-conservation in neutrino reactions—let it satisfy birefringence, photon-decay, Cherenkov, and neutrino-pair-emission bounds that exclude effective-field-theory versions of Lorentz violation. If correct, this is a unified framework for space-time symmetry breaking in which quantum foam becomes observable in multimessenger astrophysics. The paper itself cautions that the neutrino–GRB associations behind the signal are not yet confirmed.

What carries the argument

Central object: D-foam—a brane-world filled with a dilute gas of D-particle (D0-brane) defects. A neutral probe such as a photon or neutrino interacts with a defect by temporary capture; the defect recoils and the local metric develops distortion proportional to the recoil velocity, which depends on the probe momentum (a Finsler-type geometry). Averaging over defect populations yields a refractive index linear in energy, $\delta = -\frac{n+1}{2} s_n (E/E_{\rm LV})^n$ with $n=1$ favored. In the stochastic isotropic foam, vanishing mean recoil but nonzero fluctuations give opposite-sign speed shifts for neutrinos and antineutrinos, breaking CPT, and energy is not conserved in multi-particle re

What would settle it

Take the next GRB with known redshift and several GeV–TeV photons and compute the expected arrival-time offsets from $v_\gamma=1-E/(3\times10^{17}\,\mathrm{GeV})$ with the fitted negative intrinsic lag; if several such events deviate from the line beyond statistical scatter, the unified photon scale fails. Independently, observing vacuum birefringence in a polarized GRB or a photon-decay cutoff above 100 TeV would falsify the D-foam photon sector.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is that all currently observed phenomenology of Planckian space-time symmetry breaking fits one linear-in-energy refractive effect produced by D-particle foam: $E_{\rm LV}^{\gamma}\sim 3\times10^{17}$ GeV for photons, $E_{\rm LV}^{\nu}\sim 6.4\times10^{17}$ GeV for neutrinos, with the sign meaning neutrinos and antineutrinos travel at slightly different speeds. The paper shows these fitted scales match the effective foam mass $M_s/(g_s n_D)\sim10^{17}$ GeV. In the D-foam picture, a photon or neutrino is temporarily captured by a D-particle defect and re-emitted, producing an energy-dependent delay; in the stochastic isotropic variant, neutrinos and antineutrinos acquire opposi

Load-bearing premise

The fitted linear energy-to-arrival-time correlations in gamma-ray bursts and associated neutrinos must be genuine propagation effects rather than source-intrinsic spectral lags or accidental GRB–neutrino coincidences; the paper itself notes that none of the 'GRB-neutrinos' has been confirmed as coming from a GRB.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Future gamma-ray bursts with known redshift should keep producing events on the same linear $Y$–$K$ plot with the fitted $E_{\rm LV}^{\gamma}\sim 3\times10^{17}$ GeV slope and negative intrinsic intercept; outliers would break the photon regularity.
  • Confirmed neutrino–GRB associations at TeV–PeV energies should split into delayed and advanced populations with the same $E_{\rm LV}^{\nu}$ line plus a common negative intrinsic offset, which would be direct evidence of CPT violation in propagation.
  • Detection of vacuum birefringence—an energy-dependent rotation of polarization in a distant source—or of photon decay into electron–positron pairs would falsify the D-foam photon sector.
  • Charged leptons should remain exactly Lorentz invariant to the foam; constraints from synchrotron radiation and Cherenkov emission therefore do not apply to the photon and neutrino effects.
  • PeV photons from Galactic sources remain consistent because subluminal photons are stable and pair-production thresholds shift upward, making the intergalactic medium more transparent at the highest energies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fits are genuine, the ratio $E_{\rm LV}^{\nu}/E_{\rm LV}^{\gamma}$ is a measurement of the D-foam's microscopic parameters ($M_s$, $g_s$, $n_D$); a future independent determination of any one of these would turn the unified framework into a quantitative string-model test.
  • An external reader would expect the same linear time-of-flight effect in any new neutral messenger, so the model makes a sharp prediction: the highest-energy neutrino events found by future telescopes should show the same delay/advance bimodality relative to their candidate sources.
  • Because the positive evidence depends on provisional GRB–neutrino associations, a stacking analysis of future neutrino events around GRBs over multi-day windows is the cleanest test; if the associations are accidental, the delay/advance structure will not reproduce.
  • The energy-nonconservation escape from superluminal-neutrino decay is the least standard element; an independent test would be to look for foam-induced anomalies in the spectra or thresholds of multi-TeV photon–photon pair production that cannot be mimicked by source physics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper is a review-style article arguing that string-inspired D-brane foam models provide a unified explanation of apparent Lorentz/CPT violations inferred from astrophysical time-of-flight (TOF) data. It introduces three D-foam scenarios (subluminal photons/neutrinos from anisotropic recoil, stretched-string delays, and stochastic isotropic foam with CPT-violating neutrino velocities), then collects the authors' prior analyses of Fermi GRB photon lags and IceCube neutrino–GRB associations. From these it quotes a photon LV scale ELVγ ~ 3×10^17 GeV (Eq. 39) and a neutrino LV scale ELVν ~ 6.4×10^17 GeV (Eq. 41), and claims that setting the effective D-foam mass Ms/(gs nD) ~ 10^17 GeV (Eq. 42) reproduces both. The second half reviews complementary constraints (birefringence, photon decay, Cherenkov/synchrotron bounds, neutrino pair-creation limits) and argues that D-foam models evade them because the foam is transparent to charged particles and, in the stochastic version, because energy non-conservation suppresses superluminal antineutrino decay. The abstract concludes that such models 'provide a unified framework for all currently observed phenomenologies of space-time symmetry breaking at Planckian scales.'

Significance. If the claimed TOF lags were genuine vacuum-propagation effects and the D-foam model could reproduce all of them with an independently predicted scale, this would be a major result in quantum-gravity phenomenology: it would unify photon and neutrino LV signals, evade otherwise fatal constraints, and provide a concrete string-theoretic framework for subluminal photons and CPT-violating neutrinos. The review also has useful parts: it gives a compact account of Liouville/noncritical string theory, D-particle recoil, and the three D-foam scenarios, and it surveys recent LHAASO, IceCube, and KM3NeT constraints. However, the central 'unified framework' claim is not supported by the evidence presented. The fitted lags come from the authors' own analyses using an unconfirmed intrinsic-lag model; the neutrino–GRB associations are explicitly admitted to be unconfirmed; and the effective LV scale is a free parameter that is tuned to the data. As a review, the paper is therefore more a summary of a particular research program than an established result.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4, Eq. (23); §5, Eq. (42)] The central 'fit' is an identity rather than a prediction. Eq. (23) states that the effective photon LV scale MsQGγ = MD gs/ςD is 'arbitrarily free.' Eq. (42) then sets Ms/(gs nD) ~ 10^17 GeV to match the fitted ELVγ and ELVν of Eqs. (39) and (41). Since no independent relation fixes this combination of Ms, gs, nD, and ςD, the agreement with the TOF lags is a restatement of the input, not a model prediction. The paper should either derive the scale from the D-foam dynamics or explicitly present Eq. (42) as a posteriori parameter adjustment.
  2. [§5, 'Neutrino-Speed Variation from IceCube Events?' and caveat in the same section] The neutrino LV scale in Eq. (41) rests entirely on associations between IceCube events and GRBs that the paper itself concedes are not established: 'none of these GRB-neutrinos has been ascertained as being neutrinos from GRBs' and 'some of the neutrino–GRB associations can occur just accidentally.' If the associations are spurious, the linear ELVν relation has no phenomenon to explain. The abstract and conclusions nevertheless treat Eq. (41) as a datum. This is a load-bearing gap in the central claim.
  3. [§5, Eq. (40); discussion of 3.1σ rejection] The photon-side signal is conditional on the assumed intrinsic-lag model ∆t_int = αE + const (Eq. (40)). The paper reports that the dispersion-free vacuum is rejected at 3.1σ, but this significance is obtained within this assumed one-parameter source model, not by comparing against the standard astrophysical spectral-lag interpretation. The 'mainline' is also identified using the same events that are then fitted. Thus Eq. (39) is not an independent measurement of vacuum LV; it is the output of a model-dependent fit. The review should clearly separate this assumption from established evidence.
  4. [§4, scenario (3); §6, Eqs. (33)–(34)] The evasion of neutrino-decay constraints relies on additional free parameters d²_D and ζ_I with adjustable functional forms. Equations (33)–(34) show that the pair-creation threshold can be pushed arbitrarily high by choosing d²_D − 4ςI small, and the paper explicitly allows ςI to vary independently of d²_D. This makes the claim that superluminal antineutrinos are 'protected' a matter of parameter choice rather than a robust prediction of the framework. Together with the free scales in Eqs. (23) and (42), the model has enough freedom to accommodate either sign or magnitude of neutrino lag, which substantially weakens the claim of a unified and falsifiable explanation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The notation for the effective LV scales is inconsistent: ELVγ, ELVν, MsQGγ, MsQGν, and ˚MsQGν are introduced without a clear table of definitions, and the relation between ELVν and MD/d²_D is stated only in passing. A summary table would improve readability.
  2. [§5, after Eq. (40)] The text states that the functional form of ∆t_int is 'selected by data, devoid of any biased assumptions.' Given that the model family tested is a low-order polynomial in source-frame energy, this is not a bias-free model-selection claim; it only excludes higher-order terms within that family. The wording should be softened.
  3. [§5, GRB 221009A discussion] The paper mentions the LHAASO stringent LV limits [241–243] but dismisses them in one sentence due to the assumed preburst model. Since those are independent published bounds, the disagreement deserves a more quantitative discussion, including what the preburst model would predict for those data.
  4. [§6, Eq. (55)] The threshold formula for pair emission is written with Eν both as incoming energy and as a subscript in δν; the notation is confusing. Clarify that Eν,th is the threshold energy and δν the velocity deviation.
  5. [§7] The conclusion repeats the abstract's strong claim that D-foam provides 'one of the examples of experimentally finding signatures of QG.' In light of the caveats stated in §5, this should be conditioned on confirmation of the underlying associations and intrinsic-lag model.

Circularity Check

4 steps flagged · score 8.0 of 10

The D-foam 'unified framework' is built by fixing the model's free suppression scale to the self-cited, unconfirmed lag correlations, so the claimed unification is a restatement of the fit.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 5, eq. (42) (also eq. (23))]
    "an order of magnitude, Ms/gsnD(z) ∼ 1017 GeV, nD(z < 10) ≃ const., determined for the effective QG mass, by comparison with the above findings of the energy-dependent speed variations of GRB photons and neutrinos, is sufficient to make the D-foam explanation of such latter effects viable."

    Equation (23) states that the D-foam suppression scale 'is thus arbitrarily free.' The model's lag is linear in E/MsQG (eqs. (21), (35)). Setting Ms/(gs nD) ~ 10^17 GeV after (39)/(41) have fixed ELVγ ~ 3x10^17 and ELVν ~ 6.4x10^17 GeV simply reproduces the fitted numbers as model parameters. The 'explanation viable' conclusion is therefore a parameter match, not a prediction or derivation of the observed scale.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 5, equations (39)–(41) and the caveat paragraph before Section 6]
    "This regularity indicates a linearly-suppressed light-speed variation which is subluminal ... vγ(E) = 1 − E/ELVγ, with ELVγ ∼ 3 × 10^17 GeV ... vν(E) = 1 ∓ E/ELVν, with ELVν ≃ 6.4 × 10^17 GeV ... none of these “GRB-neutrinos” has been ascertained as being neutrinos from GRBs: some of the neutrino–GRB associations can occur just accidentally."

    The two 'phenomenologies' the D-foam framework is claimed to unify come from earlier analyses by the same group (Xu & Ma 2016; Huang & Ma 2018; Song & Ma 2025; etc.), not from independent external measurements. The paper's own caveat concedes the neutrino associations may be accidental. The central premise is thus a self-citation chain, and the model's fit to these values cannot independently confirm the reality of the LV signal.

2 more flagged steps
  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Section 5, after eq. (40), citing [31]]
    "As shown in [31], the functional form of ∆tint (40) is selected by data, devoid of any biased assumptions."

    The intrinsic-lag function (40) with free parameter α is an assumed source model introduced in the authors' own prior paper. The claim that it is 'selected by data' is supported only by that self-citation. The 3.1σ rejection of a no-LV vacuum is obtained inside this assumed model family, so the significance is conditional on the ansatz rather than a test against standard spectral-lag interpretations.

  2. uniqueness imported from authors [Section 5, closing paragraph]
    "it seems that, at present, only this kind of string theory models of quantum foam, where only photons and neutrinos are susceptible to foam effects, could stand up to this chance."

    The uniqueness of the D-foam solution is not proved from independent constraints in this review; it is a conclusion carried over from the authors' own series [39,47–50]. This imported uniqueness is then used to dismiss EFT-based alternatives and to present the tuned D-foam as the only viable unified framework.

full rationale

The review's central claim is that stringy D-foam models provide a unified framework for all observed Planck-scale Lorentz/CPT phenomenology. The derivation chain has two load-bearing links, both circular in the sense of reducing to inputs. First, the model's effective suppression scale is declared free in eq. (23), then set in eq. (42) to the fitted scales (39)/(41); the 'excellent fit' is therefore a fit of a free parameter to the target values, not an independent prediction. Second, the target values themselves are taken from the authors' own prior analyses, and the paper admits the neutrino associations are unconfirmed ('none of these GRB-neutrinos has been ascertained'). The energy-dependent intrinsic-lag ansatz (40) that is needed to produce the photon mainline is justified by a self-citation ([31]) that asserts it is 'selected by data.' Additional free parameters (d_D^2, ςI, nD, Ms/gs) are adjusted to push superluminal-antineutrino decay thresholds out of reach, so the claimed evasion of constraints is also flexible. These are not independent external benchmarks; they are the same fitted inputs and authors' own model choices. The qualitative content of the model (subluminal, birefringence-free photon propagation, transparency to charged leptons) is nontrivial, but the quantitative 'unified framework' claim is not: it is forced by setting the arbitrary scale to the self-cited empirical values.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central phenomenological numbers (39) and (41) are fits to the authors' selected data; the model scale (42) is then adjusted to match them; additional free parameters (zeta_I, d_D^2) are used to evade otherwise fatal constraints; and crucial premises (GRB-neutrino associations, the intrinsic-lag model) are unverified.

free parameters (6)
  • Photon LV scale ELV_gamma = ~3 x 10^17 GeV
    Fitted as the slope of the linear Y-K correlation for Fermi GRB photons (Section 5, eq. 39). It is the target quantity the D-foam scale is then tuned to match (eq. 42).
  • Neutrino LV scale ELV_nu = ~6.4 x 10^17 GeV
    Fitted from time lags and advances of IceCube neutrino events associated with GRBs (eq. 41). The association is disputed by IceCube.
  • Intrinsic time-lag parameters alpha and Delta_t_int = alpha < 0, Delta_t_int ~ -10.7 s for photons
    Eq. (40): an energy-dependent intrinsic lag is introduced to make photon events fall on the LV line; values are fit from the same dataset.
  • Effective D-foam mass Ms/(gs nD) = ~10^17 GeV
    Eq. (23) declares the suppression scale 'arbitrarily free'; eq. (42) fixes it 'by comparison with the above findings', i.e., to match ELV_gamma and ELV_nu. This is the circular step.
  • Foam variance d_D^2 = O(1) small; constrained to (d_D^2 - 4 zeta_I) <= 8.4 x 10^-8
    Eq. (29): Gaussian recoil variance, free; used to make antineutrinos superluminal and to set high pair-creation thresholds (eqs. 56-57).
  • Energy-loss coefficient zeta_I = free; chosen near d_D^2/4
    Eqs. (33), (56)-(57): controls energy non-conservation in D-foam interactions, invoked to stabilize superluminal antineutrinos against decay.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Standard Lambda-CDM cosmology and the Jacob-Piran time-lag formula (eqs. 36-37)
    Used to convert lags into LV scales; cosmology dependence claimed mild but assumed.
  • domain assumption D-foam affects only neutral particles (photons, neutrinos), leaving electrons Lorentz invariant
    Invoked in Sections 4 and 6 to evade synchrotron and Cherenkov bounds; grounded in charge conservation in the model, not in external data.
  • ad hoc to paper Energy-momentum is not conserved in D-foam interactions, with loss ~ (zeta_I/MD) p^2
    Introduced in [39,49] to push superluminal antineutrino decay thresholds beyond PeV scales; the paper states energy conservation is violated (Section 4(3)).
  • domain assumption Gaussian stochastic recoil moments with zero mean and nonzero variance (eq. 29)
    Central to the CPT-violating neutrino scenario; no microscopic derivation is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The intrinsic-lag model (eq. 40) with alpha and Delta_t_int free is the correct source model
    Needed to make GRB photon events align on a single LV line; the paper claims it is selected by data [31], but it is a fit within the same analysis.
invented entities (2)
  • Stochastic D-foam with energy-loss interactions
    purpose: Produce subluminal photon refraction and CPT-violating neutrino propagation while evading decay constraints
    The specific stochastic recoil model and the zeta_I energy-loss mechanism are constructions of [39,49] to match the fitted lags and to avoid IceCube/KM3NeT bounds; no independent detection exists.
  • Pre-burst stage of GRBs
    purpose: Account for negative intrinsic lags and align high-energy photons on the LV line
    Inferred from the authors' own time-lag fits (e.g., [240]); not independently confirmed by other GRB analyses.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probes for String-Inspired Foam, Lorentz, and CPT Violations in Astrophysics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7OTX5TCR

@misc{pith2026250811172,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probes for String-Inspired Foam, Lorentz, and CPT Violations in Astrophysics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7OTX5TCR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11172}
}
abstract

Lorentz invariance is such a basic principle in fundamental physics that it must be constantly tested and that any proposal of its violation and breakdown of CPT symmetry, that might characterize some approaches to quantum gravity, should be treated with care. In this review we examine, among other scenarios, such instances in supercritical~(Liouville) string theory, particularly in some brane models for ``quantum foam''. Using the phenomenological formalism introduced here, we analyze the observational hints of Lorentz violation in time-of-flight lags of cosmic photons and neutrinos which fit excellently stringy space-time foam scenarios. We further demonstrate how stringent constraints from other astrophysical data, including the recent first detections of multi-TeV events in $\gamma$-ray burst 221009A and PeV cosmic photons by the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory~(LHAASO), are satisfied in this context. Such models thus provide a unified framework for all currently observed phenomenologies of space-time symmetry breaking at Planckian scales.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Lorentz violation effects on astrophysical propagation of very high energy photons

    Shao, L.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz violation effects on astrophysical propagation of very high energy photons. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2010, 25, 3251–3266

    2010

  2. [2]

    Quantum-spacetime phenomenology

    Amelino-Camelia, G. Quantum-spacetime phenomenology. Living Rev. Rel. 2013, 16, 5

    2013

  3. [3]

    New perspective on space and time from Lorentz violation

    Ma, B.-Q. New perspective on space and time from Lorentz violation. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2013, 28, 1340012. Erratum in Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2013, 28, 1392001

    2013

  4. [4]

    High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance

    Coleman, S.R.; Glashow, S.L. High-energy tests of Lorentz invariance. Phys. Rev. D 1999, 59, 116008

    1999

  5. [5]

    Fermi observations of high-energy gamma-ray emission from GRB 080916C

    Fermi LAT and Fermi GBM Collaborations; Abdo, A.A.; Ackermann, M.; Arimoto, M.; Asano, K.; Atwood, W.B.; Axelsson, M.; Baldini, L.; Ballet, J.; Band, D.L.; et al. Fermi observations of high-energy gamma-ray emission from GRB 080916C. Science 2009, 323, 1688–1693

    2009

  6. [6]

    A limit on the variation of the speed of light arising from quantum gravity effects

    Fermi GBM/LAT Collaboration; Abdo, A.A.; Ackermann, M.; Ajello, M.; Asano, K.; Atwood, W.B.; Axelsson, M.; Baldini, L.; Ballet, J.; Barbiellini, G.; et al. A limit on the variation of the speed of light arising from quantum gravity effects. Nature 2009, 462, 331–334. Symmetry 2025, 17, 974 36 of 47

    2009

  7. [7]

    First observation of PeV-energy neutrinos with IceCube

    IceCube Collaboration; Aartsen, M.G.; Abbasi, R.; Abdou, Y.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Altmann, D.; Auffenberg, J.; et al. First observation of PeV-energy neutrinos with IceCube. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 021103

    2013

  8. [8]

    Evidence for high-energy extraterrestrial neutrinos at the IceCube detector

    IceCube Collaboration; Aartsen, M.G.; Abbasi, R.; Abdou, Y.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Altmann, D.; Auffenberg, J.; et al. Evidence for high-energy extraterrestrial neutrinos at the IceCube detector. Science 2013, 342, 1242856

    2013

Show all 126 references
  1. [9]

    Observation of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos in three years of IceCube data

    IceCube Collaboration; Aartsen, M.G.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Altmann, D.; Anderson, T.; Arguelles, C.; Arlen, T.C.; et al. Observation of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos in three years of IceCube data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014, 113, 101101

    2014

  2. [10]

    IceCube neutrinos and Lorentz invariance violation

    Amelino-Camelia, G.; Guetta, D.; Piran, T. IceCube neutrinos and Lorentz invariance violation. Astrophys. J. 2015, 806, 269

    2015

  3. [11]

    IceCube and GRB neutrinos propagating in quantum spacetime

    Amelino-Camelia, G.; Barcaroli, L.; D’Amico, G.; Loret, N.; Rosati, G. IceCube and GRB neutrinos propagating in quantum spacetime. Phys. Lett. B 2016, 761, 318–325

    2016

  4. [12]

    Quantum-gravity-induced dual lensing and IceCube neutrinos

    Amelino-Camelia, G.; Barcaroli, L.; D’Amico, G.; Loret, N.; Rosati, G. Quantum-gravity-induced dual lensing and IceCube neutrinos. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2017, 26, 1750076

    2017

  5. [13]

    In vacuo dispersion features for gamma-ray-burst neutrinos and photons

    Amelino-Camelia, G.; D’Amico, G.; Rosati, G.; Loret, N. In vacuo dispersion features for gamma-ray-burst neutrinos and photons. Nat. Astron. 2017, 1, 0139

    2017

  6. [14]

    In vacuo dispersion-like spectral lags in gamma-ray bursts

    Amelino-Camelia, G.; D’Amico, G.; Fiore, F.; Puccetti, S.; Ronco, M. In vacuo dispersion-like spectral lags in gamma-ray bursts. Symmetry 2021, 13, 541

    2021

  7. [15]

    Lorentz violation from gamma-ray burst neutrinos

    Huang, Y.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz violation from gamma-ray burst neutrinos. Commun. Phys. 2018, 1, 62

    2018

  8. [16]

    Consistent Lorentz violation features from near-TeV IceCube neutrinos.Phys

    Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Consistent Lorentz violation features from near-TeV IceCube neutrinos.Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 123018

    2019

  9. [17]

    Ultra-high energy cosmic neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts

    Huang, Y.; Ma, B.-Q. Ultra-high energy cosmic neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts. Fund. Res. 2024, 4, 51–56

    2024

  10. [18]

    Lorentz symmetry violation of cosmic photons

    He, P .; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz symmetry violation of cosmic photons. Universe 2022, 8, 323

    2022

  11. [19]

    Lorentz violation from cosmological objects with very high energy photon emissions

    Shao, L.; Xiao, Z.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz violation from cosmological objects with very high energy photon emissions. Astropart. Phys. 2010, 33, 312–315

    2010

  12. [20]

    Lorentz violation from gamma-ray bursts

    Zhang, S.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz violation from gamma-ray bursts. Astropart. Phys. 2015, 61, 108–112

    2015

  13. [21]

    Light speed variation from gamma-ray bursts

    Xu, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Light speed variation from gamma-ray bursts. Astropart. Phys. 2016, 82, 72–76

    2016

  14. [22]

    Light speed variation from gamma ray burst GRB 160509A

    Xu, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Light speed variation from gamma ray burst GRB 160509A. Phys. Lett. B 2016, 760, 602–604

    2016

  15. [23]

    Regularity of high energy photon events from gamma ray bursts

    Xu, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Regularity of high energy photon events from gamma ray bursts. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2018, 01, 050

    2018

  16. [24]

    Light speed variation from gamma ray bursts: Criteria for low energy photons

    Liu, Y.; Ma, B.-Q. Light speed variation from gamma ray bursts: Criteria for low energy photons. Eur. Phys. J. C 2018, 78, 825

    2018

  17. [25]

    Novel pre-burst stage of gamma-ray bursts from machine learning

    Chen, Y.; Ma, B.-Q. Novel pre-burst stage of gamma-ray bursts from machine learning. J. High Energy Astrop. 2021, 32, 78–86

    2021

  18. [26]

    Pre-burst events of gamma-ray bursts with light speed variation

    Zhu, J.; Ma, B.-Q. Pre-burst events of gamma-ray bursts with light speed variation. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 820, 136518

    2021

  19. [27]

    Pre-burst neutrinos of gamma-ray bursters accompanied by high-energy photons

    Zhu, J.; Ma, B.-Q. Pre-burst neutrinos of gamma-ray bursters accompanied by high-energy photons. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 820, 136546

    2021

  20. [28]

    Light speed variation from GRB 221009A

    Zhu, J.; Ma, B.-Q. Light speed variation from GRB 221009A. J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 2023, 50, 06LT01

    2023

  21. [29]

    Energy-dependent intrinsic time delay of gamma-ray bursts on testing Lorentz invariance violation

    Song, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Energy-dependent intrinsic time delay of gamma-ray bursts on testing Lorentz invariance violation. Phys. Lett. B 2024, 856, 138951

    2024

  22. [30]

    Examining Lorentz invariance violation with three remarkable GRB photons

    Song, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Examining Lorentz invariance violation with three remarkable GRB photons. Phys. Dark Univ. 2025, 47, 101808

    2025

  23. [31]

    Lorentz invariance violation from gamma-ray bursts

    Song, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz invariance violation from gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 2025, 983, 9

    2025

  24. [32]

    Monte Carlo simulation of GRB data to test Lorentz-invariance violation

    Song, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Monte Carlo simulation of GRB data to test Lorentz-invariance violation. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 111, 103015

    2025

  25. [33]

    Geometrodynamics and the issue of the final state

    Wheeler, J.A. Geometrodynamics and the issue of the final state. In Relativity, Groups and Topology; C.M. DeWitt, B.S. DeWitt, ed.; Gordon Breach: New York, NY, USA, 1964

    1964

  26. [34]

    Geons, black holes and quantum foam: A life in physics

    Wheeler, J.A.; Ford, K.; Goldhaber, M. Geons, black holes and quantum foam: A life in physics. Phys. Today 1999, 52, 63

    1999

  27. [35]

    Tests of quantum gravity from observations of γ-ray bursts

    Amelino-Camelia, G.; Ellis, J.; Mavromatos, N.E.; Nanopoulos, D.V .; Sarkar, S. Tests of quantum gravity from observations of γ-ray bursts. Nature 1998, 393, 763–765

    1998

  28. [36]

    Neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts as a tool to explore quantum-gravity-induced Lorentz violation

    Jacob, U.; Piran, T. Neutrinos from gamma-ray bursts as a tool to explore quantum-gravity-induced Lorentz violation. Nat. Phys. 2007, 3, 87–90

    2007

  29. [37]

    Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review

    Addazi, A.; Alvarez-Muniz, J.; Alves Batista, R.; Amelino-Camelia, G.; Antonelli, V .; Arzano, M.; Asorey, M.; Atteia, J.-L.; Bahamonde, S.; Bajardi, F.; et al. Quantum gravity phenomenology at the dawn of the multi-messenger era—A review. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 2022, 125, 103948

    2022

  30. [38]

    Lorentz-violation-induced arrival delays of cosmological particles

    Jacob, U.; Piran, T. Lorentz-violation-induced arrival delays of cosmological particles. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2008, 01, 031

    2008

  31. [39]

    Lorentz- and CPT-violating neutrinos from string/D-brane model

    Li, C.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz- and CPT-violating neutrinos from string/D-brane model. Phys. Lett. B 2022, 835, 137543

    2022

  32. [40]

    Ultrahigh-energy photons from LHAASO as probes of Lorentz symmetry violations

    Li, C.; Ma, B.-Q. Ultrahigh-energy photons from LHAASO as probes of Lorentz symmetry violations. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 104, 063012

    2021

  33. [41]

    Astrophysical bounds on Planck suppressed Lorentz violation.Lect

    Jacobson, T.; Liberati, S.; Mattingly, D. Astrophysical bounds on Planck suppressed Lorentz violation.Lect. Notes Phys. 2005, 669, 101–130

    2005

  34. [42]

    Modern tests of Lorentz invariance

    Mattingly, D. Modern tests of Lorentz invariance. Living Rev. Relativ. 2005, 8, 5. Symmetry 2025, 17, 974 37 of 47

    2005

  35. [43]

    Lorentz violation at high energy: Concepts, phenomena, and astrophysical constraints Annals Phys

    Jacobson, T.; Liberati, S.; Mattingly, D. Lorentz violation at high energy: Concepts, phenomena, and astrophysical constraints Annals Phys. 2006, 321, 150

    2006

  36. [44]

    Lorentz violation: Motivation and new constraints

    Liberati, S.; Maccione, L. Lorentz violation: Motivation and new constraints. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 2009, 59, 245–267

    2009

  37. [45]

    Tests of Lorentz invariance: A 2013 update

    Liberati, S. Tests of Lorentz invariance: A 2013 update. Class. Quantum Grav. 2013, 30, 133001

    2013

  38. [46]

    String quantum gravity, Lorentz-invariance violation and gamma ray astronomy.Int

    Mavromatos, N.E. String quantum gravity, Lorentz-invariance violation and gamma ray astronomy.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2010, 25 5409–5485

    2010

  39. [47]

    Light speed variation in a string theory model for space-time foam

    Li, C.; Ma, B.-Q. Light speed variation in a string theory model for space-time foam. Phys. Lett. B 2021, 819, 136443

    2021

  40. [48]

    Light speed variation with brane/string-inspired space-time foam

    Li, C.; Ma, B.-Q. Light speed variation with brane/string-inspired space-time foam. Results Phys. 2021, 26, 104380

    2021

  41. [49]

    Lorentz and CPT breaking in gamma-ray burst neutrinos from string theory

    Li, C.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz and CPT breaking in gamma-ray burst neutrinos from string theory. J. High Energy Phys. 2023, 03, 230

    2023

  42. [50]

    Effects on neutrino propagation in space-time foam of D-branes revisited

    Li, C.; Ma, B.-Q. Effects on neutrino propagation in space-time foam of D-branes revisited. J. High Energy Phys. 2024, 05, 266

    2024

  43. [51]

    Could quantum gravity slow down neutrinos? Nat

    Amelino-Camelia, G.; Di Luca, M.G.; Gubitosi, G.; Rosati, G.; D’Amico, G. Could quantum gravity slow down neutrinos? Nat. Astron. 2023, 7, 996–1001

    2023

  44. [52]

    IceCube high-energy starting event sample: Description and flux characterization with 7.5 years of data

    IceCube Collaboration; Abbasi, R.; Ackermann, M.; Adams, J.; Aguilar, J.A.; Ahlers, M.; Ahrens, M.; Alispach, C.; Alves, Jr., A.A.; Amin, N.M.; et al. IceCube high-energy starting event sample: Description and flux characterization with 7.5 years of data. Phys. Rev. D 2021, 10...

    2021

  45. [53]

    String theory modifies quantum mechanics

    Ellis, J.; Mavromatos, N.E.; Nanopoulos, D.V . String theory modifies quantum mechanics. Phys. Lett. B 1992, 293, 37–48

    1992

  46. [54]

    A microscopic Liouville arrow of time

    Ellis, J.; Mavromatos, N.E.; Nanopoulos, D.V . A microscopic Liouville arrow of time. Chaos Solitons Fractals 1999, 10, 345–363

    1999

  47. [55]

    The Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) Science Book (2021 Edition)

    LHAASO Collaboration; Cao, Z.; della Volpe, D.; Liu, S.-M.; Bi, X.-J.; Chen, Y.; D’Ettorre Piazzoli, B.; Feng, L.; Jia, H.-Y.; Li, Z.; et al. The Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) Science Book (2021 Edition). Chin. Phys. C 2022, 46, 030001–030007

    2021

  48. [56]

    An ultra-high-energy γ-ray telescope at 4,410 m

    Cao, Z. An ultra-high-energy γ-ray telescope at 4,410 m. Nat. Astron. 2021, 5, 849

    2021

  49. [57]

    Ultrahigh-energy photons up to 1.4 petaelectronvolts from 12 γ-ray Galactic sources

    LHAASO Collaboration; Cao, Z.; Aharonian, F.A.; An, Q.; Axikegu; Bai, L.-X.; Bai, Y.-X.; Bao, Y.-W.; Bastieri, D.; Bi, X.-J.; et al. Ultrahigh-energy photons up to 1.4 petaelectronvolts from 12 γ-ray Galactic sources. Nature 2021, 594, 33–36

    2021

  50. [58]

    Peta–electron volt gamma-ray emission from the Crab Nebula

    LHAASO Collaboration; Cao, Z.; Aharonian, F.A.; An, Q.; Axikegu; Bai, L.-X.; Bai, Y.-X.; Bao, Y.-W.; Bastieri, D.; Bi, X.-J.; et al. Peta–electron volt gamma-ray emission from the Crab Nebula. Science 2021, 373, 425–430

    2021

  51. [59]

    An ultrahigh-energy γ-ray bubble powered by a super PeVatron

    LHAASO Collaboration; Cao, Z.; Aharonian, F.A.; An, Q.; Axikegu; Bai, Y.-X.; Bao, Y.-W.; Bastieri, D.; Bi, X.-J.; Bi, Y.-J.; et al. An ultrahigh-energy γ-ray bubble powered by a super PeVatron. Sci. Bull. 2024, 69, 449–457

    2024

  52. [60]

    LHAASO observed GRB 221009A with more than 5000 VHE photons up to around 18 TeV .GCN Circ

    Huang, Y.; Hu, S.; Chen, S.; Zha, M.; Liu, C.; Yao, Z.; Cao, Z. LHAASO observed GRB 221009A with more than 5000 VHE photons up to around 18 TeV .GCN Circ. 2022, 32677, 1. Available online: http://gcn.gsfc.nasa.gov/gcn3/32677.gcn3 (accessed on 31 May 2025)

    2022

  53. [61]

    A tera–electron volt afterglow from a narrow jet in an extremely bright gamma-ray burst

    LHAASO Collaboration; Cao, Z.; Aharonian, F.A.; An, Q.; Axikegu; Bai, L.-X.; Bai, Y.-X.; Bao, Y.-W.; Bastieri, D.; Bi, X.-J.; et al. A tera–electron volt afterglow from a narrow jet in an extremely bright gamma-ray burst. Science 2023, 380, 1390–1396

    2023

  54. [62]

    Very high-energy gamma-ray emission beyond 10 TeV from GRB 221009A.Sci

    LHAASO Collaboration; Cao, Z.; Aharonian, F.A.; An, Q.; Axikegu; Bai, Y.-X.; Bao, Y.-W.; Bastieri, D.; Bi, X.-J.; Bi, Y.-J.; et al. Very high-energy gamma-ray emission beyond 10 TeV from GRB 221009A.Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadj2778

    2023

  55. [63]

    Exploring Lorentz invariance violation from ultrahigh-energy γ rays observed by LHAASO

    LHAASO Collaboration; Cao, Z.; Aharonian, F.A.; An, Q.; Axikegu; Bai, L.-X.; Bai, Y.-X.; Bao, Y.-W.; Bastieri, D.; Bi, X.-J.; et al. Exploring Lorentz invariance violation from ultrahigh-energy γ rays observed by LHAASO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 051102

    2022

  56. [64]

    Strong constraints on Lorentz violation using new γ-ray observations around PeV .Chin

    Chen, L.; Xiong, Z.; Li, C.; Chen, S.-Z.; He, H.-H. Strong constraints on Lorentz violation using new γ-ray observations around PeV .Chin. Phys. C 2021, 45, 105105

    2021

  57. [65]

    Testing Lorentz invariance of electrons with LHAASO observations of PeV gamma-rays from the Crab Nebula

    Li, C.; Ma, B.-Q. Testing Lorentz invariance of electrons with LHAASO observations of PeV gamma-rays from the Crab Nebula. Phys. Lett. B 2022, 829, 137034

    2022

  58. [66]

    Joint photon-electron Lorentz violation parameter plane from LHAASO data

    He, P .; Ma, B.-Q. Joint photon-electron Lorentz violation parameter plane from LHAASO data. Phys. Lett. B 2022, 835, 137536

    2022

  59. [67]

    Comprehensive analysis on photon-electron Lorentz-violation parameter plane.Phys

    He, P .; Ma, B.-Q. Comprehensive analysis on photon-electron Lorentz-violation parameter plane.Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 063006

    2023

  60. [68]

    LHAASO discovery of highest-energy photons towards new physics

    Li, C.; Ma, B.-Q. LHAASO discovery of highest-energy photons towards new physics. Sci. Bull. 2021, 66, 2254–2256

    2021

  61. [69]

    Searching Lorentz invariance violation from cosmic photon attenuation

    Li, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Searching Lorentz invariance violation from cosmic photon attenuation. Eur. Phys. J. C 2023, 83, 192

    2023

  62. [70]

    Lorentz invariance violation induced threshold anomaly versus very-high energy cosmic photon emission from GRB 221009A

    Li, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz invariance violation induced threshold anomaly versus very-high energy cosmic photon emission from GRB 221009A. Astropart. Phys. 2023, 148, 102831

    2023

  63. [71]

    Possible evidence for Lorentz invariance violation in gamma-ray burst 221009A

    Finke, J.D.; Razzaque, S. Possible evidence for Lorentz invariance violation in gamma-ray burst 221009A. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023, 942, L21

    2023

  64. [72]

    Revisiting Lorentz invariance violation from GRB 221009A

    Li, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Revisiting Lorentz invariance violation from GRB 221009A. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2023, 10, 061

    2023

  65. [73]

    Lorentz invariance violation from GRB221009A

    Li, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz invariance violation from GRB221009A. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2024, 39, 2350201

    2024

  66. [74]

    Dirichlet branes and Ramond-Ramond charges

    Polchinski, J. Dirichlet branes and Ramond-Ramond charges. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 4724–4727

    1995

  67. [75]

    TASI lectures on D-branes

    Polchinski, J. TASI lectures on D-branes. arXiv 1996, arXiv:hep-th/9611050. Available online: http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9611 050 (accessed on 31 May 2025)

    1996 arXiv

  68. [76]

    String Theory, Volume 2: Superstring Theory and Beyond

    Polchinski, J. String Theory, Volume 2: Superstring Theory and Beyond. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998. Available online: http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618123 (accessed on 31 May 2025)

    1998 doi

  69. [77]

    The unpredictability of quantum gravity

    Hawking, S.W. The unpredictability of quantum gravity. Commun. Math. Phys. 1982, 87, 395–415. Symmetry 2025, 17, 974 38 of 47

    1982

  70. [78]

    Search for violations of quantum mechanics

    Ellis, J.; Hagelin, J.S.; Nanopoulos, D.V .; Srednicki, M. Search for violations of quantum mechanics. Nucl. Phys. B 1984, 241, 381

    1984

  71. [79]

    Quantum gravity phenomenology, Lorentz invariance and discreteness.Mod

    Dowker, F.; Henson, J.; Sorkin, R.D. Quantum gravity phenomenology, Lorentz invariance and discreteness.Mod. Phys. Lett. A 2004, 19, 1829–1840

    2004

  72. [80]

    A short review of loop quantum gravity

    Ashtekar, A.; Bianchi, E. A short review of loop quantum gravity. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2021, 84, 042001

    2021

  73. [81]

    Weaving a classical geometry with quantum threads

    Ashtekar, A.; Rovelli, C.; Smolin, L. Weaving a classical geometry with quantum threads. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 69, 237–240

    1992

  74. [82]

    Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time

    Gambini, R.; Pullin, J. Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time. Phys. Rev. D 1999, 59, 124021

    1999

  75. [83]

    Quantum gravity corrections to neutrino propagation

    Alfaro, J.; Morales-Técotl, H.A.; Urrutia, L.F. Quantum gravity corrections to neutrino propagation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 2318

    2000

  76. [84]

    Quantum gravity and spin-1/2 particle effective dynamics.Phys

    Alfaro, J.; Morales-Técotl, H.A.; Urrutia, L.F. Quantum gravity and spin-1/2 particle effective dynamics.Phys. Rev. D 2002, 66, 124006

    2002

  77. [85]

    Loop quantum gravity and light propagation

    Alfaro, J.; Morales-Técotl, H.A.; Urrutia, L.F. Loop quantum gravity and light propagation. Phys. Rev. D 2002, 65, 103509

    2002

  78. [86]

    Speed variations of cosmic photons and neutrinos from loop quantum gravity

    Li, H.; Ma, B.-Q. Speed variations of cosmic photons and neutrinos from loop quantum gravity. Phys. Lett. B 2023, 836, 137613

    2023

  79. [87]

    Superstring Theory, Volume 1: Introduction

    Green, M.B.; Schwarz, J.H.; Witten, E. Superstring Theory, Volume 1: Introduction. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK,

  80. [88]

    Superstring Theory, Volume 2: Loop Amplitudes, Anomalies and Phenomenology

    Green, M.B.; Schwarz, J.H.; Witten, E. Superstring Theory, Volume 2: Loop Amplitudes, Anomalies and Phenomenology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012. Available online: http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248570 (accessed on 31 May 2025)

    2012 doi

  81. [89]

    Conformal field theories coupled to 2D gravity in the conformal gauge

    David, F. Conformal field theories coupled to 2D gravity in the conformal gauge. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1988, 3, 1651

    1988

  82. [90]

    Conformal field theory and 2D quantum gravity

    Distler, J.; Kawai, H. Conformal field theory and 2D quantum gravity. Nucl. Phys. B 1989, 321, 509–527

    1989

  83. [91]

    Super-Liouville theory as a two-dimensional, superconformal supergravity theory.Int

    Distler, J.; Hlousek, Z.; Kawai, H. Super-Liouville theory as a two-dimensional, superconformal supergravity theory.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 1990, 5, 391

    1990

  84. [92]

    Regularizing the functional integral in 2D-quantum gravity

    Mavromatos, N.E.; Miramontes, J.L. Regularizing the functional integral in 2D-quantum gravity. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1989, 4, 1847

    1989

  85. [93]

    Cosmological string theories and discrete inflation.Phys

    Antoniadis, I.; Bachas, C.; Ellis, J.; Nanopoulos, D.V . Cosmological string theories and discrete inflation.Phys. Lett. B 1988, 211, 393–399

    1988

  86. [94]

    An expanding Universe in string theory

    Antoniadis, I.; Bachas, C.; Ellis, J.; Nanopoulos, D.V . An expanding Universe in string theory. Nucl. Phys. B 1989, 328, 117–139

    1989

  87. [95]

    Comments on cosmological string solutions.Phys

    Antoniadis, I.; Bachas, C.; Ellis, J.; Nanopoulos, D.V . Comments on cosmological string solutions.Phys. Lett. B 1991, 257, 278–284

    1991

  88. [96]

    A string scenario for inflationary cosmology.Mod

    Ellis, J.; Mavromatos, N.E.; Nanopoulos, D.V . A string scenario for inflationary cosmology.Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1995, 10, 1685–1698

    1995

  89. [97]

    Derivation of a four dimensional c-theorem for renormaliseable quantum field theories

    Osborn, H. Derivation of a four dimensional c-theorem for renormaliseable quantum field theories. Phys. Lett. B 1989, 222, 97–102

    1989

  90. [98]

    Irreversibility

    Zamolodchikov, A.B. “Irreversibility” of the flux of the renormalization group in a 2D field theory. JETP Lett. 1986, 43, 730–732

    1986

  91. [99]

    Liouville cosmology at zero and finite temperatures.Int

    Ellis, J.R.; Mavromatos, N.E.; Westmuckett, M.; Nanopoulos, D.V . Liouville cosmology at zero and finite temperatures.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2006, 21, 1379–1444

    2006

  92. [100]

    The MAGIC of SSC and how it affects LHC

    Mavromatos, N.E.; Nanopoulos, D.V . The MAGIC of SSC and how it affects LHC. AIP Conf. Proc. 2009, 1166, 26–32

    2009

  93. [101]

    Quantum gravity: A progress report

    Carlip, S. Quantum gravity: A progress report. Rept. Prog. Phys. 2001, 64, 885

    2001

  94. [102]

    White paper and roadmap for quantum gravity phenomenology in the multi-messenger era Class

    Alves Batista, R.; Amelino-Camelia, G.; Boncioli, D.; Carmona, J.M.; di Matteo, A.; Gubitosi, G.; Lobo, I.; Mavromatos, N.E.; Pfeifer C.; Rubiera-Garcia, D.; et al. White paper and roadmap for quantum gravity phenomenology in the multi-messenger era Class. Quantum Grav. 2025, ...

    2025

  95. [103]

    Waves on noncommutative space–time and gamma-ray bursts

    Amelino-Camelia, G.; Majid, S. Waves on noncommutative space–time and gamma-ray bursts. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2000, 15, 4301–4324

    2000

  96. [104]

    Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point.Phys

    Hoˇ rava, P . Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point.Phys. Rev. D 2009, 79, 084008

    2009

  97. [105]

    Quantum criticality and Yang–Mills gauge theory.Phys

    Hoˇ rava, P . Quantum criticality and Yang–Mills gauge theory.Phys. Lett. B 2011, 694, 172–176

    2011

  98. [106]

    Field theory at a Lifshitz point

    Chen, B.; Huang, Q.-G. Field theory at a Lifshitz point. Phys. Lett. B 2010, 683, 108–113

    2010

  99. [107]

    Constraints on Lorentz invariance violation from gamma-ray burst GRB090510

    Xiao, Z.; Ma, B.-Q. Constraints on Lorentz invariance violation from gamma-ray burst GRB090510. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 116005

    2009

  100. [108]

    Relativity in space-times with short-distance structure governed by an observer-independent (Planckian) length scale

    Amelino-Camelia, G. Relativity in space-times with short-distance structure governed by an observer-independent (Planckian) length scale. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2002, 11, 35–60

    2002

  101. [109]

    Relativity: Special treatment

    Amelino-Camelia, G. Relativity: Special treatment. Nature 2002, 418, 34–35

    2002

  102. [110]

    Doubly special relativity: First results and key open problems

    Amelino-Camelia, G. Doubly special relativity: First results and key open problems. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2002, 11, 1643

    2002

  103. [111]

    Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale

    Magueijo, J.; Smolin, L. Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 190403

    2002

  104. [112]

    Generalized Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale

    Magueijo, J.; Smolin, L. Generalized Lorentz invariance with an invariant energy scale. Phys. Rev. D 2003, 67, 044017

    2003

  105. [113]

    Photon gas thermodynamics in doubly special relativity

    Zhang, X.; Shao, L.; Ma, B.-Q. Photon gas thermodynamics in doubly special relativity. Astropart. Phys. 2011, 34, 840–845

    2011

  106. [114]

    Very special relativity

    Cohen, A.G.; Glashow, S.L. Very special relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 021601

    2006

  107. [115]

    An introduction to Riemann-Finsler geometry

    Bao, D.; Chern, S.-S.; Shen, Z. An introduction to Riemann-Finsler geometry. Springer: New York, 2000. Available online: http: //doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1268-3 (accessed on 31 May 2025)

    2000 doi

  108. [116]

    Planck-scale modified dispersion relations and Finsler geometry.Phys

    Girelli, F.; Liberati, S.; Sindoni, L. Planck-scale modified dispersion relations and Finsler geometry.Phys. Rev. D 2007, 75, 064015

    2007

  109. [117]

    General very special relativity is Finsler geometry

    Gibbons, G.W.; Gomis, J.; Pope, C.N. General very special relativity is Finsler geometry. Phys. Rev. D 2007, 76, 081701

    2007

  110. [118]

    Lorentz-violation-induced arrival time delay of astroparticles in Finsler spacetime

    Zhu, J.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz-violation-induced arrival time delay of astroparticles in Finsler spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 124069. Symmetry 2025, 17, 974 39 of 47

    2022

  111. [119]

    Trajectories of astroparticles in pseudo-Finsler spacetime with the most general modified dispersion

    Zhu, J.; Ma, B.-Q. Trajectories of astroparticles in pseudo-Finsler spacetime with the most general modified dispersion. Eur. Phys. J. C 2023, 83, 349

    2023

  112. [120]

    Lorentz violation in Finsler geometry

    Zhu, J.; Ma, B.-Q. Lorentz violation in Finsler geometry. Symmetry 2023, 15, 978

    2023

  113. [121]

    Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory

    Kostelecký, V .A.; Samuel, S. Spontaneous breaking of Lorentz symmetry in string theory. Phys. Rev. D 1989, 39, 683

    1989

  114. [122]

    On a nonperturbative vacuum for the open bosonic string

    Kostelecký, V .A.; Samuel, S. On a nonperturbative vacuum for the open bosonic string. Nucl. Phys. B 1990, 336, 263–296

    1990

  115. [123]

    CPT and strings

    Kostelecký, V .A.; Potting, R. CPT and strings. Nucl. Phys. B 1991, 359, 545–570

    1991

  116. [124]

    Expectation values, Lorentz invariance, and CPT in the open bosonic string.Phys

    Kostelecký, V .A.; Potting, R. Expectation values, Lorentz invariance, and CPT in the open bosonic string.Phys. Lett. B 1996, 381, 89–96

    1996

  117. [125]

    Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model

    Colladay, D.; Kostelecký, V .A. Lorentz-violating extension of the standard model. Phys. Rev. D 1998, 58, 116002

    1998

  118. [2012]

    Available online: http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248563 (accessed on 31 May 2025)

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.