Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Large-scale dynamics in visual quorum sensing chiral suspensions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Tuning the range of a particle's visual cone drives a chiral active suspension from disorder to phase separation to hyperuniformity, with persistent edge currents around dense clusters.

desk verdict A genuinely new simulation protocol with robust emergent edge currents and effective hyperuniformity, but the mean-field phase boundaries need a direct finite-size test before the quantitative claims are settled. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11254 v1 pith:ULWSXKDM submitted 2025-08-15 cond-mat.soft physics.app-ph

Yuxin Zhou , Qingqing Yin , Shubhadip Nayak , Poulami Bag , Pulak K. Ghosh , Yunyun Li , Fabio Marchesoni This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.app-ph
keywords visualquorumsensingchiralactiveparticlesnon-reciprocalinteractionsmotility-inducedphaseseparationedgecurrentshyperuniformityactive-passivemixturesprogrammablematter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a purely perceptual, non-reciprocal interaction—particles flipping the handedness of their circular motion when too many neighbours appear in a forward-facing visual cone—can organize a fluid of self-propelled particles. It claims that tuning the sensing range drives the suspension through three regimes: uniform disorder, phase separation into dense clusters or empty cavities bounded by persistent edge currents, and finally a hyperuniform state in which long-wavelength density fluctuations vanish. Because the effect persists for pointlike particles and when all direct repulsion is turned off, the paper concludes that crowding and steric forces are not the cause; the directional threshold-based sensing alone generates the order. If the claim is right, local perception rules—not forces—can herd, rotate, and order suspensions, providing a design principle for programmable active materials and micro-robotic swarms.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the visual-cone sensing function $P_i(d_c) = \sum_{j \in \text{cone}} 1/(2\pi r_{ij})$, summed over neighbours inside a forward-facing cone of radius $d_c$ and semi-aperture $\alpha$, compared with the threshold $P_{th} = (\alpha/\pi)\rho_0 L_p$; the particle's chirality switches between $+\omega_0$ and $-\omega_0$ depending on whether $P_i$ is below or above $P_{th}$. This threshold comparison is what makes the interaction non-reciprocal: particle $i$ responds to its neighbours without those neighbours responding back. The paper's analytic anchor is the mean-field estimate $\rho_c = \rho_0 L_p/(d_c - \sigma)$, obtained by equating the average sensing function to $P_{th}$; it predicts the dense-phase density and marks where phase separation ends and hyperuniformity begins. The edge-current picture completes the mechanism: a disk near a density boundary sees low density, rotates toward the dense region, then flips chirality when its cone fills, so the boundary is swept by a persistent circulating layer.

What would settle it

In a steady-state cluster, compute each particle's actual sensing function $P_i(d_c)$ from the neighbour coordinates and check whether its spatial average matches $(\alpha/\pi)\rho_0(d_c - \sigma)$; a statistically significant mismatch while the cluster persists would disprove the mean-field estimate $\rho_c = \rho_0 L_p/(d_c - \sigma)$. Alternatively, run identical simulations at two or more box sizes with fixed $d_c/L_p$ and see whether the hyperuniform transition shifts with $L$; any shift would falsify the claimed box-size independence.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that one scalar control—the sensing range $d_c$ of a particle's visual cone—acts as a switch for collective organization in a chiral active suspension. Below a threshold $d_c^*$ the suspension stays uniform; as $d_c$ increases, clusters form, the dense phase becomes larger and less dense, then cavities appear, and for $d_c/L_p \gtrsim 1.3$ the whole box becomes effectively hyperuniform, with structure factor $S(q) \sim q^2$ and density variance $\langle\delta\rho^2(l)\rangle \sim l^{-3}$. In the two-phase regimes, particles at the interface circulate persistently around the dense cluster or cavity: a particle that sees little inside its cone rotates toward the crowd, reverses chirality when it sees high density, and cycles again, producing what the paper calls edge currents. The paper shows these currents are genuine quorum-sensing effects, present even with the steric repulsion set to zero; only the herding of passive particles in active–passive mixtures requires steric collisions between species. With roughly 5% active chiral sensing particles, the mixture organizes passive colloids into dense rotating aggregates.

Load-bearing premise

The analytic predictions assume that inside a dense cluster every particle still senses its neighbours through the uniform-suspension average formula, so that equating that average to the threshold fixes both the dense-phase density and the hyperuniform boundary; if local packing or multi-particle correlations change how neighbours are counted, the predicted density and the claimed box-size independence would break down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Tuning $d_c$ alone programs the steady state: disorder, clusters, cavities, and hyperuniformity are reached by one control knob, with the dense-phase density set by $d_c$ rather than fixed by packing fraction.
  • Edge currents around dense clusters arise without steric interactions, so observed circulation around aggregates in dilute chiral suspensions points toward a perception-based, non-reciprocal mechanism rather than excluded-volume crowding.
  • The transition to hyperuniformity is predicted to be independent of the simulation-box size because it is fixed by the range ratio $d_c/L_p$; larger boxes should show the same transition at the same $d_c$.
  • Active–passive mixtures can be manipulated by a small active fraction: about 5% of quorum-sensing chiral particles suffices to herd passive colloids into dense rotating aggregates, provided the two species collide.
  • The protocol supplies a design principle for programmable active materials: replace forces with perception rules, and choose $d_c$ and $\alpha$ to select the desired collective state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the dense-phase density decreases as $d_c$ grows while clusters enlarge, the aggregates are activity-selected rather than equilibrium droplets; a natural extension is to test whether cluster radius and edge-current strength collapse onto a single scaling curve as functions of $d_c/L_p$ and $P_{th}$.
  • The visual-quorum rule is intrinsically directional and non-reciprocal; extending it to three dimensions or to elongated particles might weaken edge currents, since the cone geometry and body alignment would change how frequently a boundary particle flips chirality.
  • Herding of passive particles requires steric contact, suggesting a threshold repulsion strength; an explicit simulation varying the repulsion amplitude could map the minimal interaction needed for herding and give a sharp experimental handle.
  • The reported exponents—$S(q) \sim q^2$ and variance $\sim l^{-3}$—could serve as fingerprints to search for perception-based hyperuniform-like order in biological swarms, such as fish schools or bacterial clusters, where direct interaction forces are hard to measure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a two-dimensional suspension of self-propelled, chiral Brownian disks whose chirality reverses when the local density of neighbors inside a visual cone exceeds a threshold (quorum-sensing protocol 1; Eq. (3)). Using Brownian dynamics simulations for monodisperse suspensions and for active-passive mixtures, it reports a sequence of collective states upon increasing the sensing range d_c: homogeneous disorder, phase-separated clusters with persistent edge currents, cavity structures with reversed edge currents, and an effective hyperuniform state. The dense-phase density is argued to decrease with d_c and is estimated as rho_c = rho0 L_p/(d_c - sigma) from a mean-field threshold condition. In mixtures, as few as 5% quorum-sensing chiral particles are reported to herd passive particles into dense aggregates. The paper also reports robustness checks showing that the edge currents persist in the absence of steric interactions.

Significance. If the reported observations are fully supported, the paper makes a valuable contribution to active-matter pattern formation: it demonstrates a perception-based, non-reciprocal mechanism that produces large-scale circulation and effective hyperuniformity without attractive interactions, and it shows that a small fraction of chiral quorum-sensing particles can organize passive components. Strengths of the paper include extensive Brownian dynamics simulations with long time averaging, several system sizes, parameter sweeps over alpha, omega0, d_c, and delta, and explicit checks with epsilon = 0 confirming that edge currents do not require steric repulsion. The main quantitative weakness is that the analytic estimates for the dense-phase density and for the hyperuniform-onset boundary are consistency relations built on a uniform mean-field sensing function, and their status as tested predictions is not fully established. Because the qualitative phenomenology is robustly demonstrated, this concern is addressable with additional analysis rather than fatal.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model, Eq. (3); Monodisperse suspensions] The relation rho_c = rho0 L_p/(d_c - sigma), and with it the inferred hyperuniform onset d_c - sigma >= L_p, is obtained by equating the uniform-suspension mean-field sensing function bar{P}(d_c) = (alpha/pi) rho0 (d_c - sigma) with the threshold P_th, and then replacing rho0 by rho_c inside the dense cluster. The manuscript does not test whether Eq. (2) evaluated inside the dense phase has this mean-field form; crowded-cluster correlations and the finite cone aperture could change both the prefactor and the effective cutoff, and the authors themselves state that the argument is 'less accurate for small clusters.' Since these estimates are used to support quantitative claims that the dense-phase density decreases with d_c and that the hyperuniform transition occurs at d_c/L_p >= 1.3, I ask for a direct simulation of the conditional sensing function P_i(d_c) for particles in the dense phase, or for an independent determination of rho_c and of the hyperuniform boundary that does not assume the mean-field form.
  2. [Monodisperse suspensions; Edge currents and hyperuniformity, Fig. 2(e)] The paper asserts that the cluster-to-cavity transition appears for d_c values independent of the system size and that the transition to hyperuniformity is expected to be independent of the simulation box size, but the first assertion is made without displaying a finite-size scaling study, and the second is derived from the same mean-field argument rather than from a systematic size sweep. The only finite-size comparison shown is the inset of Fig. 2(e), which reports the vorticity peak radius r_c for N = 3*10^3 and N = 6*10^3; this does not establish the location of the hyperuniform transition. Please add a systematic finite-size analysis of the d_c values for the cluster-cavity and hyperuniform boundaries, or explicitly reclassify the box-size-independence statements as predictions that remain to be tested.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Model, after Eq. (3)] The mean-field expression bar{P}(d_c) = (alpha/pi) rho0 (d_c - sigma) is stated without derivation; a one-line derivation showing how the visual-cone area and the sigma cutoff enter would make the threshold choice easier to assess.
  2. [Figure captions and Materials and Methods] The box size L is never listed in a figure caption; although Materials and Methods says L is fixed by N, bar{phi}, and r0, stating L explicitly in each caption would aid reproducibility.
  3. [Chiral-passive mixtures] In the sentence 'The QS threshold of Eq.(2) should now be interpreted as follows,' the reference should be to Eq. (3), since Eq. (2) defines the sensing function rather than the threshold.
  4. [References] The reference list contains formatting artifacts, including a typographically distorted author name in Ref. [3] and an apparently incomplete author entry in Ref. [16]; please correct these before publication.
  5. [Abstract and Discussion] Because the structure factor S(q -> 0) is small but finite, the term 'hyperuniformity' should be consistently qualified as 'effective hyperuniformity' in the abstract and in all summary statements to avoid overclaiming.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor self-consistency in analytic phase-boundary estimates; central simulation findings remain independent.

  1. self definitional [Model section after Eq. (3); Monodisperse suspensions following Fig. 1(i)]
    "for a uniform suspension the sensing function of Eq. (2) is approximatively P¯(dc) = (α/π)ρ0(dc−σ). ... Particles inside large clusters [0.6<dc/Lp < 1 in Fig. 1(h)], look uniformly distributed, so that ρc can be estimated by equating P¯(dc) with Pth, hence ρc = ρ0Lp/(dc−σ) ... By the same token we anticipate that for dc−σ ≳ Lp local particle density inhomogeneities are no longer required for the tagged particle to satisfy the QS condition Eq. (3). This yields a working estimate for the dc value where two-phase configurations disappear and HU sets in"

    Equating the mean-field sensing function P¯(dc) = (α/π)ρ0(dc−σ) with the protocol threshold Pth = (α/π)ρ0Lp cancels the common prefactor (α/π)ρ0, reducing the phase-boundary condition to dc−σ = Lp. Solving the same equation for ρc after replacing ρ0 by ρc gives ρc = ρ0Lp/(dc−σ). Thus the analytic estimates of the dense-phase density and of the hyperuniform-onset boundary are algebraic restatements of the threshold definition, not independent derivations. They do not by themselves establish the transitions; the simulation measurements of P(ρ), S(q), ⟨δρ²(l)⟩, and ϖ(r) carry that argument.

full rationale

The main claims of the paper—disorder-to-phase-separation-to-hyperuniformity transitions, persistent edge currents, and herding of passive particles—are established by direct numerical simulation (Figs. 1–3, S(q), ⟨δρ²(l)⟩, vorticity ϖ(r)), not by fitting a parameter to a target result. The only self-referential element is the analytic estimate in the Model/Monodisperse section: equating the uniform-suspension mean-field sensing function P¯(dc) = (α/π)ρ0(dc−σ) to the protocol threshold Pth = (α/π)ρ0Lp yields ρc = ρ0Lp/(dc−σ) and the HU-onset criterion dc−σ ≳ Lp. Because Pth contains the same prefactor (α/π)ρ0, these formulas are algebraic restatements of the threshold definition; the paper explicitly labels them a 'working estimate' and notes reduced accuracy for small clusters, so they are heuristic consistency relations rather than independent first-principles predictions. The transitions themselves remain genuine simulation findings: the emergence of the dense peak in P(ρ) at dc≃5.3, the measured scaling S(q→0)∼q² and ⟨δρ²(l→∞)⟩∼l⁻³, and the vorticity reversal between clusters and cavities are direct measurements not implied by the threshold condition alone. The citation of the same group's prior work [33] for the threshold form Pth is a modeling choice, not a load-bearing uniqueness claim, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The claimed box-size independence of the HU transition is extrapolated from the same mean-field estimate rather than a full finite-size scaling study, but the HU scaling itself is measured directly. Overall, the circularity is minor and confined to a supporting analytic estimate, not the core results. Score 2/10.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the assumed visual QS rule and the standard active Brownian particle model. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The only hand-chosen length scale entering the threshold is L_p, which is a model parameter rather than a fitted constant. The mean-field sensing approximation and the hyperuniformity criteria are background tools whose validity is partially tested by the simulations but not proven.

free parameters (1)
  • L_p (threshold defining range) = 10 (reduced units)
    L_p enters the threshold P_th = (alpha/pi)rho0 L_p and sets the dimensionless control ratio d_c/L_p. It is a hand-chosen model parameter, not fitted to data, but all reported phase boundaries are expressed in units of L_p.
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Particles respond to local density via the sensing function P_i(d_c) = Sum_{j in V^dc_i} 1/(2*pi*r_ij) (Eq. 2).
    This specific non-reciprocal visual perception rule drives all reported collective states; no experimental or independent theoretical calibration is given for this functional form.
  • ad hoc to paper Chirality switches instantaneously between +omega0 and -omega0 according to the threshold P_th = (alpha/pi)rho0 L_p (Eq. 3, protocol 1).
    Protocol 1 defines the sign-reversal dynamics; the threshold is taken from the authors' earlier model (Ref 33) and is a modeling choice, not derived from experiments.
  • domain assumption The suspension is athermal, with overdamped Langevin dynamics and angular white noise only; hydrodynamic interactions and translational thermal fluctuations are neglected (Eq. 1, Materials and Methods).
    Standard active Brownian particle modeling. The paper explicitly states that reciprocal and hydrodynamic interactions are neglected, so the observed phenomena are only shown to exist in this reduced model.
  • domain assumption WCA steric repulsion, when present, is the only finite-size effect, and it can be switched off (epsilon = 0) to realize pointlike particles (Model section, Discussion).
    The claim that edge currents are a genuine non-reciprocal effect without steric interactions depends on the epsilon = 0 simulation faithfully representing the pointlike limit.
  • standard math For a uniform suspension, Pbar(d_c) = (alpha/pi)rho0(d_c - sigma), used to estimate cluster density and the hyperuniformity onset (Model section).
    Mean-field estimate of the sensing function assuming a uniform neighbor distribution and an excluded-volume cutoff at sigma. It is standard but approximate and is the basis for several quantitative predictions.
  • standard math Hyperuniformity is diagnosed by S(q->0) ~ q^2 and <delta_rho^2(l)> ~ l^-3 (Fig. 2h,i).
    Standard hyperuniformity criteria from Refs 26,27, applied here with the authors' explicit caveat that the measured state is only 'effective' hyperuniformity because S(q->0) is small but finite.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large-scale dynamics in visual quorum sensing chiral suspensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ULWSXKDM

@misc{pith2026250811254,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large-scale dynamics in visual quorum sensing chiral suspensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ULWSXKDM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11254}
}
read the original abstract

Motility induced phase separation is an efficient aggregation mechanism of active matter, yet biological systems exhibit richer organization through communication among constituents. We investigate suspensions of active particles that change chirality when neighbor density within their visual cone exceeds a threshold, a communication based non-reciprocal interaction akin to quorum sensing. Tuning the visual cone triggers programmable transitions: from disorder to phase separation to hyper-uniformity. Notably, phase separation triggers large-scale circulation, with robust edge currents persistently flowing around dense clusters, while particle distributions inside become effectively hyper-uniform. These are genuine non-reciprocal effects which occur even in the absence of steric interactions. Remarkably, in active-passive mixtures, only 5% quorum-sensing chiral particles suffice to induce collective circulation. Thus, simple perception-based rules can generate life-like order, offering design principles for programmable active materials and micro-robotic swarms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.11254 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Configurations of a chiral suspension of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Edge currents in two-phase configurations of a chiral suspension of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Aggregation of passive particles by chiral particles under QS protocol 1 of Eq. (3) (implemented as explained in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Kinetic and Hydrodynamic Theories of Chiral Intruder Dynamics in Nonequilibrium Baths

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An intruder in a chiral nonequilibrium bath acquires shape-chirality ratchet torques in the dilute limit and edge-current-generated odd drag and torque in the dense limit.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Jiang and S

    S. Jiang and S. Granick, Janus particle synthesis, self- assembly and applications (RSC Publishing, Cambridge, 2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Walther and A

    A. Walther and A. H. E. M¨ uller, Janus particles: Synthe- sis, self-assembly, physical properties, and applications, Chem. Rev. 113, 5194 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrody- namics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013)

    2013

  4. [4]

    Jayaram, Y

    R. Jayaram, Y. Jie, L. Zhao, and H. I. Andersson, Clus- tering of inertial spheres in evolving Taylor-Green vortex flow, Phys. Fluids 32, 043306 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Y. Li, Y. Zhou, F. Marchesoni, and P. K. Ghosh, Col- loidal clustering and diffusion in a convection cell array, Soft Matter 18, 4778 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    P. K. Ghosh, Y. Zhou, Y. Li, F. Marchesoni, and F. Nori, Binary mixtures in linear convection arrays, ChemPhysChem 24, e202200471 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Y. Duan, J. Agudo-Canalejo, R. Golestanian, and B. Mahault, Dynamical pattern formation without self- attraction in quorum-sensing active matter: The inter- play between nonreciprocity and motility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 148301 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Fily and M

    Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with no alignment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 235702 (2012)

    2012

Show all 38 references
  1. [10]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase sepa- ration, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 219 (2015)

    2015

  2. [11]

    M. B. Miller and B. L. Bassler, Quorum sensing in bac- teria, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 55, 165 (2001)

    2001

  3. [12]

    M. R. Parsek and E. P. Greenberg, Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms, Trends Microbiol. 13, 27 (2005)

    2005

  4. [13]

    B¨ auerle, A

    T. B¨ auerle, A. Fischer, T. Speck, and C. Bechinger, Self- organization of active particles by quorum sensing rules, Nat. Commun. 9, 3232 (2018)

    2018

  5. [14]

    F. A. Lavergne, H. Wendehenne, T. B¨ auerle, and C. Bechinger, Group formation and cohesion of active particles with visual perception–dependent motility, Sci- ence 364, 6435 (2019)

    2019

  6. [15]

    Barberis and F

    L. Barberis and F. Peruani, Large-scale patterns in a minimal cognitive flocking model: Incidental leaders, ne- matic patterns, and aggregates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 248001 (2016)

    2016

  7. [16]

    B¨ auerle, L

    T. B¨ auerle, L. R. C, and C. Bechinger, Formation of sta- ble and responsive collective states in suspensions of ac- tive colloids, Nat. Commun. 11, 2547 (2020)

    2020

  8. [17]

    Thapa, B.-E

    S. Thapa, B.-E. Pinchasik, and Y. Shokef, Emergent clus- tering due to quorum sensing in active matter, New J. Phys. 26, 023010 (2024)

    2024

  9. [18]

    Y. Zhou, Y. Li, and F. Marchesoni, A quorum sensing active matter in a confined geometry, Chin. Phys. Lett. 40, 100505 (2023)

    2023

  10. [19]

    Saavedra, G

    R. Saavedra, G. Gompper, and M. Ripoll, Swirling due to misaligned perception-dependent motility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 268301 (2024)

    2024

  11. [20]

    R. S. Negi, R. G. Winkler, and G. Gompper, Emergent collective behavior of active brownian particles with vi- sual perception, Soft Matter 18, 6167 (2022)

    2022

  12. [21]

    Q. Lei, M. P. Ciamarra, and R. Ni, Nonequilibrium strongly hyperuniform fluids of circle active particles with large local density fluctuations, Sci. Adv. 5, eaau7423 (2019)

    2019

  13. [22]

    Lauga and T

    E. Lauga and T. R. Powers, The hydrodynamics of swimming microorganisms, Rep. Prog. Phys. 72, 096601 (2009). 7

    2009

  14. [23]

    Liao and S

    G.-J. Liao and S. H. L. Klapp, Clustering and phase sep- aration of circle swimmers dispersed in a monolayer, Soft Matter 14, 7873 (2018)

    2018

  15. [24]

    Ma and R

    Z. Ma and R. Ni, Dynamical clustering interrupts motility-induced phase separation in chiral active brow- nian particles, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 021102 (2022)

    2022

  16. [25]

    Lei and R

    Q. Lei and R. Ni, Hydrodynamics of random-organizing hyperuniform fluids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 116, 22983 (2019)

    2019

  17. [26]

    Torquato and F

    S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger, Local density fluctua- tions, hyperuniformity, and order metrics, Phys. Rev. E 68, 041113 (2003)

    2003

  18. [27]

    Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Phys

    S. Torquato, Hyperuniform states of matter, Phys. Rep 745, 1 (2018)

    2018

  19. [28]

    J. D. Weeks, D. Chandler, and H. C. Andersen, Role of repulsive forces in determining the equilibrium structure of simple liquids, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 5237 (1971)

    1971

  20. [29]

    X. Yang, C. Liu, Y. Li, F. Marchesoni, P. H¨ anggi, and H. P. Zhang, Hydrodynamic and entropic effects on col- loidal diffusion in corrugated channels, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 9564 (2017)

    2017

  21. [30]

    Takagi, J

    D. Takagi, J. Palacci, A. B. Braunschweig, M. J. Shelley, and J. Zhang, Hydrodynamic capture of microswimmers into sphere-bound orbits, Soft Matter 10, 1784 (2014)

    2014

  22. [31]

    Berlinger, M

    F. Berlinger, M. Gauci, and R. Nagpal, Implicit coordi- nation for 3d underwater collective behaviors in a fish- inspired robot swarm, Sci Robot. 6, eabd8668 (2021)

    2021

  23. [32]

    Jiang, A

    M. Jiang, A. Zhou, R. Chen, Y. Yang, H. Dong, and W. Wang, Collective motions of fish originate from balanced local perceptual interactions and individual stochastic, Phys. Rev. E 107, 024411 (2023)

    2023

  24. [33]

    Y. Zhou, Y. Li, and F. Marchesoni, Clustering of quorum sensing colloidal particles, Natl. Sci. Open 3, 20230081 (2024)

    2024

  25. [34]

    Okabe and K

    A. Okabe and K. Sugihara, Spatial Tessellations: Con- cepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams (2nd ed. (Wiley, New York), 2000)

    2000

  26. [35]

    G. S. Redner, M. F. Hagan, and A. Baskaran, Structure and dynamics of a phase-separating active colloidal fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 055701 (2013)

    2013

  27. [36]

    Nayak, P

    S. Nayak, P. Bag, P. K. Ghosh, Y. Li, Y. Zhou, Q. Yin, F. Marchesoni, and F. Nori, Diffusion transients in motility-induced phase separation, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013153 (2025)

    2025

  28. [37]

    P. K. Ghosh, V. R. Misko, F. Marchesoni, and F. Nori, Self-propelled janus particles in a ratchet: Numerical simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 268301 (2013)

    2013

  29. [38]

    van Teeffelen and H

    S. van Teeffelen and H. L¨ owen, Dynamics of a brownian circle swimmer, Phys. Rev. E 78, 020101 (2008)

    2008

  30. [39]

    P. E. Kloeden and E. Platen, Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations (Springer, Berlin, 1992). Acknowledgements F unding: This work is supported by National Natu- ral Science Foundation of China grant 12375037 (LYY), National Natural Science Foundation of China...

    1992

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.