Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Control of magnetic transition, metal-semiconductor transition, and magnetic anisotropy in noncentrosymmetric monolayer Cr$_2$Ge$_2$Se$_3$Te$_3$

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that noncentrosymmetric Janus Cr2Ge2Se3Te3 is a ferromagnet whose magnetic order, electronic character, and easy axis are switchable by strain, with electric-field tunable magnetocrystalline anisotropy.

desk verdict Manuscript body is an unrelated astronomy paper; the claimed DFT study of Cr2Ge2Se3Te3 is entirely absent, so the abstract's results have no support. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11899 v1 pith:HLOOFYN2 submitted 2025-08-16 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el

Rui-Qi Wang , Tengfei Cao , Tian-Min Lei , Xie Zhang , Yue-Wen Fang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el
keywords two-dimensionalmagnetsJanusmonolayerCr2Ge2Se3Te3strain-drivenphasetransitionmetal-semiconductormagnetocrystallineanisotropyelectric-fieldcontrolfirst-principlescalculations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's stated goal is to establish, by first-principles calculation, that the Janus monolayer Cr2Ge2Se3Te3—a noncentrosymmetric relative of the known magnet Cr2Ge2Te6—is a ferromagnet whose magnetic order, electronic band character, and magnetic anisotropy can be controlled with strain and electric field. If true, this would matter because it would put two useful controls, switching between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic order and between metallic and semiconducting behavior, plus rotating the magnetic easy axis, into a single atomic layer without an inversion center. The record's attached body, however, is a photometric study of eight contact binary stars; it contains no density-functional-theory method, structure, strain values, field strengths, band structures, or magnetocrystalline anisotropy numbers. The abstract's claims therefore stand as the paper's intended contribution, but the evidence for them is not present in the text supplied.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Janus structure of Cr2Ge2Se3Te3, formed by making the two faces of the layer chemically different (Se on one side, Te on the other), which removes inversion symmetry while keeping the layer two-dimensional. The argument is carried by two computed quantities: the energy difference between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic spin arrangements as a function of strain, which sets the magnetic ground state, and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy (MAE), obtained from spin-orbit coupling, which sets the easy axis. The MAE is further decomposed by orbital channels, and the p orbitals of the Te3 atoms are the decisive term in the paper's explanation of how strain and e

What would settle it

Run a first-principles calculation on the Cr2Ge2Se3Te3 monolayer and compare total energies of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic ordering across the stated strain range, along with the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy and its easy-axis direction. The central claim would be settled by whether the ferromagnetic ground state, the magnetic transition, the metal-semiconductor crossing, and the in-plane-to-out-of-plane anisotropy switch all reproduce; no such results are present in this document.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that replacing one Te layer of Cr2Ge2Te6 with Se produces a Janus ferromagnetic monolayer, Cr2Ge2Se3Te3, that breaks inversion symmetry and remains magnetically ordered. Under different applied strains the same monolayer is said to transform between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic ground states and between metallic and semiconducting electronic states; the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy is modulated by both electric field and strain, and strain can flip the easy axis from in-plane to out-of-plane. The Te3 sites are identified as the dominant source of the anisotropy, with the largest contributions coming from $p_z/p_y$ and $p_x/p_y$ orbita

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the attached text is the paper described in the abstract; the abstract's claims about Cr2Ge2Se3Te3 rest entirely on first-principles calculations that do not appear anywhere in the supplied body, so if those calculations are missing the central claim has no evidentiary support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single monolayer of Cr2Ge2Se3Te3 would let strain choose between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic order, so a mechanical handle could replace magnetic-field switching in a two-dimensional device.
  • The same strain range would also cross a metal-semiconductor transition, coupling the magnetic order parameter to the electronic transport in one material.
  • Electric field and strain both tune the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy, giving electrostatic control over the magnetization direction.
  • Rotating the easy axis from in-plane to out-of-plane under strain makes the monolayer a candidate for voltage- or stress-controlled magnetic memory bits.
  • Identifying Te3 p orbitals as the anisotropy source offers a concrete substitution site for alloying or chemical design of stronger or differently oriented anisotropy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A reader cannot test these claims from this record: the attached text supplies none of the density-functional-theory data, so the first step is to recover or reproduce the original calculations.
  • If the strain-driven ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic and metal-semiconductor transitions survive more rigorous treatment, the same Janus design could generalize to other members of the Cr2Ge2Te6 family.
  • The claimed in-plane to out-of-plane easy-axis switch is a sharp signature that could be checked experimentally in exfoliated or grown flakes by measuring anisotropic magnetoresistance or using torque magnetometry as a function of strain, although no such measurement is reported here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The abstract announces first-principles predictions for a noncentrosymmetric Janus monolayer Cr2Ge2Se3Te3: strain-driven ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic and metal-semiconductor transitions, electric-field/strain-tunable magnetocrystalline anisotropy, and an in-plane-to-out-of-plane easy-axis switch, attributed mainly to Te3 orbitals. The full text supplied with the submission is, however, an unrelated observational astronomy paper, 'BSN-II: The First Light Curve Study of Eight Total Eclipsing Contact Binary Stars with Shallow Fillout Factors.' That body contains no DFT method, no structural model of Cr2Ge2Se3Te3, no strain or electric-field ranges, no band structures, no MAE values, no orbital-resolved analysis, and no discussion of the claimed material in any section, equation, table, or figure. The central claims therefore have no in-text derivation or evidentiary support.

Significance. If substantiated, the abstract's claims would be of genuine interest to the 2D magnetism and spintronics communities, since noncentrosymmetric Janus ferromagnets with strain-tunable magnetic order and anisotropy are actively sought. However, as submitted the manuscript contains none of the promised calculations. There are no reproducible code, machine-checked proofs, parameter-free derivations, or falsifiable predictions for Cr2Ge2Se3Te3 that can be assessed. The submitted text is an astronomy paper with a different title, abstract, authors, and subject matter. Consequently, the paper's significance cannot be evaluated beyond the abstract, and the abstract itself is unsupported by the body.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract vs. Full Text] The abstract reports first-principles calculations for monolayer Cr2Ge2Se3Te3, but the manuscript body is an astronomy paper on eight contact binary systems. No section, equation, table, or figure in the body pertains to Cr2Ge2Se3Te3, DFT, strain, electric fields, magnetic transitions, or MAE. The central claims — FM-AFM transition, metal-semiconductor transition, MAE modulation, and easy-axis switching — have zero in-text derivation. This is a load-bearing structural failure, not a missing detail.
  2. [Sections 2–5 (body)] The body's methods and results are entirely photometric: observations, O-C analysis, PHOEBE light-curve fits, and Gaia-based absolute parameters. There is no computational setup for the claimed material — no exchange-correlation functional, pseudopotential, cutoff energy, k-mesh, van der Waals treatment, or convergence criteria — and no results such as band structures, density of states, magnetic moments, or MAE curves. The claimed findings cannot be reproduced, checked, or even located in the manuscript.
  3. [Internal consistency] The title and abstract of the submission are inconsistent with the body's own abstract, keywords, and content. This is not a divergence from consensus or a subtle interpretive issue; it is a complete mismatch between the paper's stated claims and its evidentiary text. As a result, the referee cannot assess soundness beyond noting the absence of support for every substantive claim, including the specific orbital decomposition of MAE attributed to Te3 p_z/p_y and p_x/p_y states.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Structure] The manuscript has no conclusions section for the DFT study. The body ends with acknowledgments and references belonging to the astronomy paper, leaving the abstract's claims completely unclosed.
  2. [Title/Abstract mismatch] The submission's title and abstract should match the body. As written, the paper reads as an astronomy preprint (apparently arXiv:2508.11901) mistakenly paired with a condensed-matter abstract.
  3. [Self-containment] Even the abstract's qualifying statement that 'Te3 atoms play a key role' is not supported by any figure or table in the body. A reader should be able to trace each claimed result to a specific numerical or graphical result; none exists here.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the manuscript body contains no DFT derivation for Cr2Ge2Se3Te3, so there is no reduction chain to audit.

full rationale

The supplied full text is an unrelated astronomy paper, 'BSN-II: The First Light Curve Study of Eight Total Eclipsing Contact Binary Stars with Shallow Fillout Factors.' It contains no first-principles methodology, no structural model of Cr2Ge2Se3Te3, no strain or electric-field ranges, no band structures, and no magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy values. The abstract's claims about strain-driven magnetic transitions and MAE tuning are therefore unsupported by the manuscript body. However, circularity requires demonstrating that a claimed prediction reduces by construction to its own inputs or to a self-citation chain. Here, there is no derivation chain at all to reduce; the problem is an absence of evidence, not circularity. Under the hard rules, circularity may only be flagged when a specific reduction can be quoted from the paper. None exists, so the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests entirely on unshown DFT calculations. No free parameters can be extracted because no methods or values appear in the manuscript. The only recoverable assumptions are the generic reliability of DFT for such magnets and the stability of the proposed monolayer, neither of which is evidenced in the text.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption DFT with an appropriate functional reliably predicts magnetic ground states, band gaps, and MAE of 2D magnets.
    The abstract's claims depend on first-principles accuracy; no validation is provided in the text.
  • domain assumption The abstract's monolayer Cr2Ge2Se3Te3 is a structurally stable Janus layer accessible in calculations.
    No structural or formation-energy data appear in the provided manuscript.
invented entities (1)
  • Monolayer Cr2Ge2Se3Te3 Janus ferromagnet
    purpose: Proposed noncentrosymmetric 2D magnet with strain/electric-field tunable order and anisotropy
    It is predicted in the abstract, but no synthesis, experimental data, or falsifiable handle is provided in the text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Control of magnetic transition, metal-semiconductor transition, and magnetic anisotropy in noncentrosymmetric monolayer Cr$_2$Ge$_2$Se$_3$Te$_3$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HLOOFYN2

@misc{pith2026250811899,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Control of magnetic transition, metal-semiconductor transition, and magnetic anisotropy in noncentrosymmetric monolayer Cr$_2$Ge$_2$Se$_3$Te$_3$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HLOOFYN2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11899}
}
abstract

Recent advances in two-dimensional materials have greatly expanded the family of ferromagnetic materials. The well-known 2D ferromagnets, such as CrI$_3$, Cr$_2$Ge$_2$Te$_6$, and Fe$_3$GeTe$_2$ monolayers, are characterized by centrosymmetric crystal structures. In contrast, ferromagnetic ordering in 2D noncentrosymmetric materials remains an underexplored area. Here we report a Janus ferromagnet, Cr$_2$Ge$_2$Se$_3$Te$_3$ with inversion symmetry breaking, through first-principles calculations. This monolayer can undergo a ferromagnetic-antiferromagnetic transformation and a metal-semiconductor transition under different strains. Additionally, the strength of magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy (MAE) can be modulated by electric field or strain. In particular, the magnetization easy axis can be altered from in-plane to out-of-plane under strain. We find that Te$_3$ atoms play a key role in determining the MAE, where contributions are primarily from $p_z / p_y$ and $p_x / p_y$ orbitals. This study of Janus ferromagnetic materials has provided a promising platform for the research on the control of magnetism by strain or electric field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. OmniD: Generalizable Robot Manipulation Policy via Image-Based BEV Representation

    cs.RO 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-camera robot policy that builds a bird's-eye-view representation with deformable attention reportedly improves in-distribution, out-of-distribution, and few-shot manipulation performance by 11%, 17%, and 84% o...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2000, AJ, 119, 1901, doi: 10.1086/301321

    Akerlof, C., Amrose, S., Balsano, R., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 1901, doi: 10.1086/301321

    work page doi:10.1086/301321 2000

  2. [2]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Barlow, T., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 068003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab0c2a

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab0c2a 2019

  3. [3]

    1970, Vistas in Astronomy, 12, 217, doi: 10.1016/0083-6656(70)90041-3

    Binnendijk, L. 1970, Vistas in Astronomy, 12, 217, doi: 10.1016/0083-6656(70)90041-3

    doi:10.1016/0083-6656(70)90041-3 1970

  4. [4]

    W., West, R

    Butters, O. W., West, R. G., Anderson, D. R., et al. 2010, A&A, 520, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015655

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015655 2010

  5. [5]

    Castelli, F., & Kurucz, R. L. 2004, A&A, 419, 725, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040079

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20040079 2004

  6. [6]

    2018, ApJS, 237, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aad32b

    Chen, X., Wang, S., Deng, L., de Grijs, R., & Yang, M. 2018, ApJS, 237, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aad32b

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aad32b 2018

  7. [7]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9cae

    Chen, X., Wang, S., Deng, L., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9cae

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab9cae 2020

  8. [8]

    E., Kochoska, A., Hey, D., et al

    Conroy, K. E., Kochoska, A., Hey, D., et al. 2020, ApJS, 250, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb4e2

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abb4e2 2020

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Cox, A. N. 2000, Allen’s astrophysical quantities (New York: AIP Press; Springer)

    2000

  2. [10]

    J., Graham, M

    Drake, A. J., Graham, M. J., Djorgovski, S. G., et al. 2014, ApJS, 213, 9, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/213/1/9

    2014 doi

  3. [11]

    Eastman, J., Siverd, R., & Gaudi, B. S. 2010, PASP, 122, 935, doi: 10.1086/655938

    2010 doi

  4. [12]

    2006, MNRAS, 373, 1483, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11073.x

    Eker, Z., Demircan, O., Bilir, S., & Karata¸ s, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1483, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11073.x

    2006

  5. [13]

    2018, MNRAS, 479, 5491, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1834

    Eker, Z., Bakı¸ s, V., Bilir, S., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 5491, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1834

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    Flower, P. J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 355, doi: 10.1086/177785 Gaia Collaboration, Montegriffo, P., Bellazzini, M., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243709

    1996 doi

  7. [15]

    J., Geske, M

    Gettel, S. J., Geske, M. T., & McKay, T. A. 2006, AJ, 131, 621, doi: 10.1086/498016

    2006 doi

  8. [16]

    2000, A&AS, 141, 371, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000126

    Girardi, L., Bressan, A., Bertelli, G., & Chiosi, C. 2000, A&AS, 141, 371, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000126

    2000 doi

  9. [17]

    2019, ApJ, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    Finkbeiner, D. 2019, ApJ, 887, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5362

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    W., King, D

    Hilditch, R. W., King, D. J., & McFarlane, T. M. 1989, MNRAS, 237, 447, doi: 10.1093/mnras/237.2.447

    1989 doi

  11. [19]

    I., Harrison, T

    Hoffman, D. I., Harrison, T. E., & McNamara, B. J. 2009, AJ, 138, 466, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/138/2/466

    2009 doi

  12. [20]

    S., Stanek, K

    Jayasinghe, T., Kochanek, C. S., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2018a, MNRAS, 477, 3145, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty838 —. 2018b, MNRAS, 477, 3145, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty838

    doi

  13. [21]

    2012, MNRAS, 421, 2769, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20323.x

    Jiang, D., Han, Z., Ge, H., Yang, L., & Li, L. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2769, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20323.x

    2012

  14. [22]

    Kuiper, G. P. 1941, Astrophysical Journal, vol. 93, p. 133, 93, 133

    1941

  15. [23]

    Kwee, K. K. 1958, BAN, 14, 131

    1958

  16. [24]

    K., & van Woerden, H

    Kwee, K. K., & van Woerden, H. 1956, BAN, 12, 327

    1956

  17. [25]

    2022, AJ, 164, 202, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac8ff2

    Li, K., Gao, X., Liu, X.-Y., et al. 2022, AJ, 164, 202, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac8ff2

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    2020, The Astronomical Journal, 159, 189, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab7cda

    Li, K., Kim, C.-H., Xia, Q.-Q., et al. 2020, The Astronomical Journal, 159, 189, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab7cda

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    Li, K., & Qian, S. B. 2013, NewA, 21, 46, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2012.11.003

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    2021, AJ, 162, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abfc53

    Li, K., Xia, Q.-Q., Kim, C.-H., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abfc53

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    2008, MNRAS, 387, 97, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12736.x

    Li, L., Zhang, F., Han, Z., Jiang, D., & Jiang, T. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 97, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12736.x

    2008

  22. [30]

    2003, ChJA&A, 3, 142, doi: 10.1088/1009-9271/3/2/142

    Liu, Q.-Y., & Yang, Y.-L. 2003, ChJA&A, 3, 142, doi: 10.1088/1009-9271/3/2/142

    2003 doi

  23. [31]

    Lucy, L. B. 1967, ZA, 65, 89 —. 1968a, ApJ, 151, 1123, doi: 10.1086/149510 —. 1968b, ApJ, 153, 877, doi: 10.1086/149712

    1967 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Laher, R

    Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac

    2019 doi

  25. [33]

    Mochnacki, S. W. 1981, The Astrophysical Journal, 245, 650, doi: 10.1086/158845

    1981 doi

  26. [34]

    A., & Mead, R

    Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. 1965, The computer journal, 7, 308 16 O’Connell, D. J. K. 1951, Publications of the Riverview College Observatory, 2, 85

    1965

  27. [35]

    Paki, E., Poro, A., & Moosavi Rowzati, M. D. 2025, Galaxies, 13, 74, doi: 10.3390/galaxies13040074

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    2013, AJ, 146, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/101

    Palaversa, L., Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Eyer, L., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/101

    2013 doi

  29. [37]

    2024a, PASP, 136, 024201, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ad1ed3

    Poro, A., Tanriver, M., Michel, R., & Paki, E. 2024a, PASP, 136, 024201, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ad1ed3

    doi

  30. [38]

    2024b, AJ, 168, 272, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad8345

    Poro, A., Li, K., Michel, R., et al. 2024b, AJ, 168, 272, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad8345

    doi

  31. [39]

    2024c, NewA, 110, 102227, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102227

    Poro, A., Hedayatjoo, M., Nastaran, M., et al. 2024c, NewA, 110, 102227, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2024.102227

    2024

  32. [40]

    2025, MNRAS, 537, 3160, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf222 Prˇ sa, A., Conroy, K

    Poro, A., Li, K., Paki, E., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 3160, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf222 Prˇ sa, A., Conroy, K. E., Horvat, M., et al. 2016, ApJS, 227, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/227/2/29

    2025 doi

  33. [41]

    2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 163, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/163

    Qian, S.-B., Zhu, L.-Y., Liu, L., et al. 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 163, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/163

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    B., Liu, N

    Qian, S. B., Liu, N. P., Li, K., et al. 2013, ApJS, 209, 13, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/13

    2013 doi

  35. [43]

    B., Wang, J

    Qian, S. B., Wang, J. J., Zhu, L. Y., et al. 2014, ApJS, 212, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/4

    2014 doi

  36. [44]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 Ruci´ nski, S. M. 1969, AcA, 19, 245 S´ anchez-S´ aez, P., Arredondo, J., Bayo, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A195, do...

    2015 doi

  37. [45]

    J., Prieto, J

    Shappee, B. J., Prieto, J. L., Grupe, D., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/48

    2014 doi

  38. [46]

    2024, NewA, 105, 102112, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2023.102112

    Soomandar, S., & Poro, A. 2024, NewA, 105, 102112, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2023.102112

    2024

  39. [47]

    S., & Vivekananda Rao, P

    Sriram, K., Malu, S., Choi, C. S., & Vivekananda Rao, P. 2017, AJ, 153, 231, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6893

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    2006, AcA, 56, 199, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0510464

    Stepien, K. 2006, AcA, 56, 199, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0510464

    2006 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Terrell, D., & Wilson, R. E. 2005, Ap&SS, 296, 221, doi: 10.1007/s10509-005-4449-4

    2005 doi

  42. [50]

    1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tody, D. 1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford, 733, doi: 10.1117/12.968154

    1986 doi

  43. [51]

    2010, AJ, 140, 1158, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1158

    Torres, G. 2010, AJ, 140, 1158, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1158

    2010 doi

  44. [52]

    V., Dremova, G

    Tutukov, A. V., Dremova, G. N., & Svechnikov, M. A. 2004, Astronomy Reports, 48, 219, doi: 10.1134/1.1687015

    2004 doi

  45. [53]

    Yakut, K., & Eggleton, P. P. 2005, ApJ, 629, 1055, doi: 10.1086/431300

    2005 doi

  46. [54]

    2013, MNRAS, 430, 2029, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt028

    Yildiz, M., & Do˘ gan, T. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2029, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt028

    2013 doi

  47. [55]

    2020, MNRAS, 492, 4112, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa079

    Zhang, X.-D., Qian, S.-B., & Liao, W.-P. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 4112, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa079

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.