Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Quantum biosensing on a multiplexed functionalized diamond microarray

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a 7×7 DNA microarray on diamond can turn target binding into a multiplexed, label-free quantum readout.

desk verdict Solid building blocks and honest surface chemistry, but the headline claim of 49-plex simultaneous quantum detection is not demonstrated: the array and the T1 readout never meet on the same chip. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.13193 v1 pith:3H6YMKOE submitted 2025-08-15 physics.ins-det physics.bio-phphysics.chem-phquant-ph

Ignacio Chi-Durán , Evan J. Villafranca , David Dang , Rachelle Rosiles , Chun Tung Cheung , Zhiran Zhang , Jason P. Cleveland , Peter C. Maurer This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ins-detphysics.bio-phphysics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords nitrogen-vacancycentersquantumbiosensingDNAmicroarraymultiplexeddetectionT1relaxometryGd3+spinlabelstranddisplacementdiamondsurfacefunctionalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to make quantum biosensing multiplexed. It claims that a 7×7 DNA microarray can be patterned directly onto a diamond chip with a subnanometer antifouling layer, and that binding of an unlabeled target can be read as a change in the spin relaxation time $T_1$ of nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers. The key step is a 15-minute single-step silanization that attaches biotin–PEG to diamond hydroxyl groups, leaving the target DNA only a few nanometers from the sensors. On that layer the authors print 49 DNA spots that are uniform, addressable, and sequence-specific, with non-specific hybridization kept under 6%. To make the readout quantum, a Gd$^{3+}$-labeled reporter strand is displaced by the target, removing magnetic noise and restoring $T_1$ by 93–95%. The paper concludes this combines multiplexing, specificity, and label-free quantum detection in one scalable platform.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the Gd$^{3+}$-DOTA displacement readout coupled to nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers—diamond defects whose spin relaxation time $T_1$ shortens near magnetic noise. Immobilized duplexes carry one strand with 3.4 or 8.5 Gd$^{3+}$-DOTA labels, which shorten $T_1$; hybridization of an unlabeled complementary strand displaces that labeled strand and restores $T_1$. The Gd$^{3+}$ layer is modeled as an infinite two-dimensional spin sheet at distance $d$, giving $1/T_1 \propto \sigma/d^4$, and fitted correlation times $\tau_c$ of 0.67–4.76 ns match known Gd-complex and dye-DNA dynamics. The enabling layer is the biotin–PEG–silane monolayer, which puts DNA within sensing range w

What would settle it

Pattern the actual 7×7 array with Gd$^{3+}$-labeled incumbent strands on every spot, incubate each spot with its complementary target, then measure $T_1$ in a spatially resolved way across the chip: if only some spots regain $T_1$, or non-complementary control spots do, the multiplexing claim fails. A second check is repeating the displacement measurement on a spot at the reported ~27,500 molecules/µm² density rather than on the separate duplex construct, to test whether array-scale crowding suppresses the $T_1$ recovery.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A one-step biotin–PEG–silane coating on diamond forms a 0.28 nm antifouling monolayer in 15 minutes, suppressing non-specific adsorption ~50-fold and supporting ~27,500 ssDNA-streptavidin conjugates per µm². On it, a 7×7 array prints 49 addressable DNA spots on a 2×2 mm² chip with <6% cross-hybridization. In a separate duplex construct, a complementary invader strand displaces Gd$^{3+}$-DOTA-labeled reporters, restoring NV $T_1$ from a 47% or 70% reduction back to 93% or 95% of control, with no recovery for non-complementary DNA. The paper claims this displacement readout, combined with the array, gives a scalable, multiplexed, label-free quantum biosensing platform generalizable to proteins

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 49 fluorescence-verified DNA spots will still produce the Gd$^{3+}$-displacement $T_1$ signal when array patterning and relaxometry are done on the same chip, because the displacement data in Fig. 4 come from a separate, non-array construct while the array in Figs. 2–3 is verified only by fluorescence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because the PEG layer is about 0.3 nm thick and needs no oxide intermediate, the sensing distance is minimized; the model makes $T_1$ contrast scale as $d^{-4}$, so thinner functionalization directly improves sensitivity.
  • The 49-spot array occupies only a fifth of the chip area, so the same chemistry extends to higher spot densities and larger chips.
  • No modification of the target is required: binding is detected by removal of a reporter's magnetic noise, making the readout label-free with respect to the analyte.
  • Sequence discrimination is high in the demonstrated conditions—non-complementary strands contribute under 6% of fluorescence and fail to restore $T_1$—supporting spatially addressable multiplexing.
  • The displacement logic depends only on nucleic-acid hybridization, so replacing the complementary strand with an aptamer should extend the same $T_1$ readout to small molecules and proteins.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I infer the decisive next experiment is the one the paper does not report: pre-loading every spot of the 49-spot array with Gd$^{3+}$-labeled reporters and reading $T_1$ across the array after target incubation, because the current array evidence is fluorescence-only and the displacement evidence comes from a separate construct.
  • I infer that the intrinsically binary readout (label present or displaced) makes the platform naturally suited to presence/absence tests and single-base discrimination; quantitative concentration measurements would likely need calibration curves or staged displacement probes.
  • I infer that a widefield NV imaging version could read all 49 spots' $T_1$ simultaneously rather than sequentially, turning the array into a real-time monitor of displacement kinetics across many targets at once.
  • I infer there is a testable density trade-off: the reported ~26% hybridization yield suggests crowded spots lower binding efficiency, so an optimal DNA density likely exists that balances signal strength against displacement efficiency for $T_1$ contrast.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a diamond surface functionalization with biotin-PEG-silane, patterning of a 7×7 DNA spot array on a 2×2 mm² chip, and a Gd³⁺-DOTA displacement assay that modulates NV-center T₁ relaxation. The authors demonstrate high DNA immobilization density, low nonspecific adsorption, sequence-specific hybridization for four unique ssDNA sequences, and a T₁ reduction/restoration cycle on a non-patterned duplex construct. They argue that these components together constitute a scalable multiplexed quantum biosensor. However, the central claim of simultaneous 49-plex quantum detection is not experimentally supported: the array and the T₁ displacement readout are never combined in a single experiment, and the array hybridization study itself uses only four unique sequences rather than 49 distinct biomolecular features.

Significance. If the integrated experiment were added, the platform would be a valuable contribution to NV-based biosensing. The reported surface chemistry is a useful advance: the 15-minute biotin-PEG-silane functionalization produces a thin (0.28 nm dry) layer with strong biotin-streptavidin specificity, as shown by the 24-fold silane dependence and 50-fold nonspecific-adsorption suppression in Fig. 1c. The hybridization specificity matrix in Fig. 3b, with cross-talk below 6%, is a credible demonstration of sequence selectivity. The T₁ displacement mechanism in Fig. 4 is a plausible and potentially generalizable transduction scheme, and the non-complementary control establishes specificity. The missing link is the experiment that combines the patterned array with the T₁ readout; without it, the paper presents two disconnected proof-of-principle demonstrations rather than the unified platform claimed in the abstract. The gap is fixable within the manuscript's scope by a straightforward integrated measurement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Quantum sensing experiments; Fig. 4] The central claim of 'simultaneous detection of 49 distinct biomolecular features' via quantum readout is not demonstrated. The T₁ displacement experiment is performed on a non-patterned duplex construct (Fig. 4b,c), not on the 7×7 array. No T₁ measurement is taken from an array spot after Gd³⁺-labeled strand displacement. Since the stated ~20 μm T₁ excitation area is compatible with the 150 μm spot size, the integrated experiment is straightforward and should be included. Without it, the abstract's headline claim is an extrapolation.
  2. [Results: DNA microarray; Fig. 3] The paper claims a 7×7 array enabling 'detection of 49 distinct biomolecular features,' but the hybridization experiment in Fig. 3 uses only four unique ssDNA sequences arranged in four spatially distinct regions. Fig. 2 demonstrates spot patterning and binary mixtures, not 49 distinct probes or 49 distinct targets. The array is a 49-addressable format, not a demonstrated 49-plex assay. The text and abstract should be revised to distinguish addressable positions from demonstrated multiplexed detection, or the authors should add an experiment showing at least several distinct sequences read out on the same chip.
  3. [Fig. 4b,c] The T₁ recovery data lack reported sample sizes. The box plots in Fig. 4b indicate distributions, but no N is stated and no statistical test is provided for the 93% and 95% recovery values versus the non-complementary control. Without replication and a significance test, the robustness of the displacement-induced T₁ restoration is not quantified. This is directly relevant to the claim that the mechanism produces a reliable binary quantum readout.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract; Conclusion] The term 'simultaneous detection' is misleading because the T₁ readout is a point measurement with a ~20 μm excitation area; even an array readout would be sequential spot-by-spot. 'Multiplexed addressable detection' or 'parallel on-chip array' would be more accurate.
  2. [Quantum sensing experiments; Eq. (2)] The spin-dynamics interpretation in Fig. 4d is underdetermined: d is set to 7+h nm with h varied over 2.5–8.5 nm, and τc is then fitted. The resulting τc values span 0.67–4.76 ns, an order-of-magnitude range. The authors should state explicitly that h and τc are degenerate in this analysis and that the consistency with literature values is illustrative rather than a precise measurement.
  3. [Introduction; Abstract] The assay is described as 'label-free,' but the reporter strand carries a Gd³⁺-DOTA label. The target is unlabeled, which is an advantage, but the terminology should be clarified to avoid implying that no labels are used anywhere in the detection scheme.
  4. [Fig. 1e] The PEG layer is described as 'subnanometer' based on a dry AFM thickness of 0.28 ± 0.08 nm. Under hydrated conditions the layer may swell; the authors should qualify the claim as dry thickness or provide a hydrated measurement.
  5. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption for Fig. 3d states that 'the four resulting images are assigned different colors and overlaid,' but the panel is described in the text as a false-color image. Clarify the relationship between the grayscale images in Fig. 3c and the false-color overlay in Fig. 3d.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's key claims rest on direct measurements and external controls, with only a minor consistency fit that is not presented as a prediction.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is self-contained. Surface functionalization is verified by XPS, AFM, and fluorescence binding controls; the 7x7 array is characterized by fluorescence patterning and hybridization specificity against non-complementary controls; and the Gd3+-displacement T1 mechanism is demonstrated by direct relaxometry with complementary and non-complementary invader strands. The spin-dynamics analysis (Eqs. 1–2) is not circular: B_perp^2 is computed from independently measured AFM thickness and assumed Gd density, and tau_c is explicitly fitted to the observed 1/T1 data. Because tau_c is a fitted parameter, the subsequent statement that it is 'consistent with previous reports' is a consistency check, not a prediction forced by construction. The paper's central claims do not depend on a self-citation chain: prior work by the same group (e.g., Refs. 21, 22) is used as inspiration and context, but the experiments reported here are new and directly support the conclusions. The main weakness is that the array patterning and the T1 displacement assay are not demonstrated on the same chip, but that is an omitted experiment, not a circular derivation. Hence no significant circularity is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is experimental and rests on surface chemistry and T1 measurements; no new physical entities are introduced. The quantitative model uses two effective parameters (h and tau_c) that are not independently fixed, making the spin-dynamics section a consistency check rather than a predictive derivation.

free parameters (2)
  • tau_c (Gd3+ spin correlation time) = 0.67-4.76 ns depending on h
    Fit from 1/T1 vs B2perp in Eq. 1-2 and Fig 4d; not independently measured.
  • h (hydrated NV-Gd separation offset) = 2.5-8.5 nm range
    Chosen by hand to bracket expected hydration swelling of the PEG/streptavidin layer; dry AFM thickness is only 0.28-2.5 nm.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption T1 relaxation rate follows 1/T1 = 1/T1bulk + (3 gamma_e^2 B2_perp) * tau_c/(1 + omega0^2 tau_c^2)
    Taken from refs 45,46; standard for Gd3+ spin noise but assumes Lorentzian spectral density and no surface charge contributions.
  • domain assumption Gd3+ ensemble can be modeled as an infinite 2D uniform spin sheet
    Edge effects neglected because feature area is four orders of magnitude larger than sensing spot; uniform density assumed.
  • domain assumption NV center depth is 7 +/- 2 nm from implantation-energy correlations
    From ref 47; not measured per chip; strongly affects d and hence B2_perp.
  • domain assumption Complementary invader strand displaces the shorter Gd3+-labeled incumbent strand from the surface duplex
    Inferred indirectly from T1 recovery; no direct fluorescence observation of displaced labeled strand is reported.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum biosensing on a multiplexed functionalized diamond microarray." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3H6YMKOE

@misc{pith2026250813193,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum biosensing on a multiplexed functionalized diamond microarray},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3H6YMKOE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.13193}
}
abstract

Quantum sensing with nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond promises to revolutionize biological research and medical diagnostics. Thanks to their high sensitivity, NV sensors could, in principle, detect specific binding events with metabolites and proteins in a massively parallel and label-free way, avoiding the complexity of mass spectrometry. Realizing this vision has been hindered by the lack of quantum sensor arrays that unite high-density spatial multiplexing with uncompromising biochemical specificity. Here, we introduce a scalable quantum biosensing platform that overcomes these barriers by integrating the first multiplexed DNA microarray directly onto a subnanometer antifouling diamond surface. The 7x7 DNA array, patterned onto a diamond chip, enables simultaneous detection of 49 distinct biomolecular features with high spatial resolution and reproducibility, as verified by fluorescence microscopy. Molecular recognition is converted into a quantum signal via a target-induced displacement mechanism in which hybridization removes a Gd$^{3+}$-tagged DNA strand, restoring NV center spin relaxation times (T$_1$) and producing a binary quantum readout. This platform establishes a new paradigm for high-throughput, multiplexed quantum biosensing and opens the door to advanced molecular diagnostics and large-scale quantum sensor networks operable in complex biological environments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.13193 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. a) Surface functionalization steps to immobilize a high density DNA. b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a) Scheme of DNA microarray fabrication using a picoliter dispensing robot. b) 7x7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. a) Scheme of hybridization of Cy3-labeled cDNA strands on diamond surface. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) Displacement of a short Gd3+-DOTA labeled complementary (incumbent) strand by a fully complementary (invader) strand. b) T1 values in each functionalization step. The boxes represent the statistical distribution of each group, where the central horizontal bar denote…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Patterning programmable spin arrays on DNA origami for quantum technologies

    quant-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DNA origami on diamond surfaces preserves nitrogen-vacancy center coherence and enables NV-based readout of programmable Gd3+ spin density with linear response.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R.; Stanwix, P

    Maze, J. R.; Stanwix, P. L.; Hodges, J. S.; Hong, S.; Taylor, J. M.; Cappellaro, P.; Jiang, L.; Dutt, M. V. G.; Togan, E.; Zibrov, A. S.; Yacoby, A.; Walsworth, R. L.; Lukin, M. D. Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an individual electronic spin in diamond. Nature 2008, 455, 644--647

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    Y.; Kolesov, R.; Al-Hmoud, M.; Tisler, J.; Shin, C.; Kim, C.; Wojcik, A.; Hemmer, P

    Balasubramanian, G.; Chan, I. Y.; Kolesov, R.; Al-Hmoud, M.; Tisler, J.; Shin, C.; Kim, C.; Wojcik, A.; Hemmer, P. R.; Krueger, A.; Hanke, T.; Leitenstorfer, A.; Bratschitsch, R.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J. Nanoscale imaging magnetometry with diamond spins under ambient conditions. Nature 2008, 455, 648--651

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    A.; Reinhard, F.; Wrachtrup, J

    Staudacher, T.; Shi, F.; Pezzagna, S.; Meijer, J.; Du, J.; Meriles, C. A.; Reinhard, F.; Wrachtrup, J. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy on a (5-Nanometer) ^3 Sample Volume. Science 2013, 339, 561--563

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    Loretz, M.; Pezzagna, S.; Meijer, J.; Degen, C. L. Nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance with a 1.9-nm-deep nitrogen-vacancy sensor. Applied Physics Letters 2014, 104, 033102

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    I.; Futamura, L.; Fox, C.; Cambria, M

    Rovny, J.; Yuan, Z.; Fitzpatrick, M.; Abdalla, A. I.; Futamura, L.; Fox, C.; Cambria, M. C.; Kolkowitz, S.; de Leon, N. P. Nanoscale covariance magnetometry with diamond quantum sensors. Science 2022, 378, 1301--1305

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    W.; Nöbauer, T.; Rempp, F.; Balasubramanian, G.; Wolf, T.; Reinhard, F.; Hollenberg, L

    Dolde, F.; Fedder, H.; Doherty, M. W.; Nöbauer, T.; Rempp, F.; Balasubramanian, G.; Wolf, T.; Reinhard, F.; Hollenberg, L. C. L.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J. Electric-field sensing using single diamond spins. Nat. Phys. 2011, 7, 459--463

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Nanoscale electric-field imaging based on a quantum sensor and its charge-state control under ambient condition

    Bian, K.; Zheng, W.; Zeng, X.; Chen, X.; Stöhr, R.; Denisenko, A.; Yang, S.; Wrachtrup, J.; Jiang, Y. Nanoscale electric-field imaging based on a quantum sensor and its charge-state control under ambient condition. Nat. Communications 2021, 12

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    X.; Yacoby, A

    Qiu, Z.; Hamo, A.; Vool, U.; Zhou, T. X.; Yacoby, A. Nanoscale electric field imaging with an ambient scanning quantum sensor microscope. Npj Quantum Inf. 2022, 8, 1--7

    work page 2022

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    C.; Yao, N

    Kucsko, G.; Maurer, P. C.; Yao, N. Y.; Kubo, M.; Noh, H. J.; Lo, P. K.; Park, H.; Lukin, M. D. Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell. Nature 2013, 500, 54--58

    2013

  2. [10]

    H.; Suter, D.; Sumiya, H.; Isoya, J.; Wrachtrup, J

    Neumann, P.; Jakobi, I.; Dolde, F.; Burk, C.; Reuter, R.; Waldherr, G.; Honert, J.; Wolf, T.; Brunner, A.; Shim, J. H.; Suter, D.; Sumiya, H.; Isoya, J.; Wrachtrup, J. High-Precision Nanoscale Temperature Sensing Using Single Defects in Diamond. Nano Letters 2013, 13, 2738--27...

    2013

  3. [11]

    M.; de las Casas, C

    Toyli, D. M.; de las Casas, C. F.; Christle, D. J.; Dobrovitski, V. V.; Awschalom, D. D. Fluorescence thermometry enhanced by the quantum coherence of single spins in diamond. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013, 110, 8417--8421

    2013

  4. [12]

    S.; Bezinge, L.; Gliddon, H

    Miller, B. S.; Bezinge, L.; Gliddon, H. D.; Huang, D.; Dold, G.; Gray, E. R.; Heaney, J.; Dobson, P. J.; Nastouli, E.; Morton, J. J. L.; McKendry, R. A. Spin-enhanced nanodiamond biosensing for ultrasensitive diagnostics. Nature 2020, 587, 588–593

    2020

  5. [13]

    Multiplexed sensing of biomolecules with optically detected magnetic resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond

    Kayci, M.; Fan, J.; Bakirman, O.; Herrmann, A. Multiplexed sensing of biomolecules with optically detected magnetic resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2021, 118, e2112664118

    2021

  6. [14]

    SARS - CoV -2 quantum sensor based on nitrogen-vacancy centers in Diamond

    Li, C.; Soleyman, R.; Kohandel, M.; Cappellaro, P. SARS - CoV -2 quantum sensor based on nitrogen-vacancy centers in Diamond. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 43--49

    2022

  7. [15]

    Diamond magnetometry detection of biological targets

    Rampersaud, A.; Rampersaud, I.; Flectcher, C.; Forren, M. Diamond magnetometry detection of biological targets. US Patent 20240254567:A1. 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    P.; Holczer, K.; J., V.-H

    Cleveland, J. P.; Holczer, K.; J., V.-H. B. P. U . S . Patent No. 10,481,155. US Patent 10,481,155 2019,

    2019

  9. [17]

    S.; Henning, A.; Heindl, M

    Liu, K. S.; Henning, A.; Heindl, M. W.; Allert, R. D.; Bartl, J. D.; Sharp, I. D.; Rizzato, R.; Bucher, D. B. Surface NMR using quantum sensors in diamond. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2022, 119, e2111607119

    2022

  10. [18]

    A.; Rizzato, R.; Pershin, A.; Schepp, M

    Freire-Moschovitis, F. A.; Rizzato, R.; Pershin, A.; Schepp, M. R.; Allert, R. D.; Todenhagen, L. M.; Brandt, M. S.; Gali, A.; Bucher, D. B. The Role of Electrolytes in the Relaxation of Near-Surface Spin Defects in Diamond. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 10474--10485, PMID: 37212793

    2023

  11. [19]

    A.; Jayich, A

    Ariyaratne, A.; Bluvstein, D.; Myers, B. A.; Jayich, A. C. B. Nanoscale electrical conductivity imaging using a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond. Nature Communications 2018, 9

    2018

  12. [20]

    C.; Zhou, J.; Williams, V.; Li, S.; Lu, H.; Djugba, D.; Wang, H.; Flebus, B.; Ni, N.; Du, C

    Huang, M.; Green, J. C.; Zhou, J.; Williams, V.; Li, S.; Lu, H.; Djugba, D.; Wang, H.; Flebus, B.; Ni, N.; Du, C. R. Layer-dependent magnetism and spin fluctuations in atomically thin van der Waals magnet CrPS4 . Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 8099--8105

    2023

  13. [21]

    Xie, M.; Yu, X.; Rodgers, L. V. H.; Xu, D.; Chi-Durán, I.; Toros, A.; Quack, N.; de Leon, N. P.; Maurer, P. C. Biocompatible surface functionalization architecture for a diamond quantum sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2022, 119, e2114186119

    2022

  14. [22]

    Rodgers, L. V. H. et al. Diamond surface functionalization via visible light-driven C - H activation for nanoscale quantum sensing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2024, 121, e2316032121

    2024

  15. [23]

    J.; Blum, A

    Gidi, Y.; Bayram, S.; Ablenas, C. J.; Blum, A. S.; Cosa, G. Efficient one-step PEG -silane passivation of glass surfaces for single-molecule fluorescence studies. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 39505--39511

    2018

  16. [24]

    Sangtawesin, S. et al. Origins of Diamond surface noise probed by correlating single-spin measurements with surface spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. X. 2019, 9, 031052

    2019

  17. [25]

    A.; El-Azazy, M.; Luyt, A

    Issa, A. A.; El-Azazy, M.; Luyt, A. S. Kinetics of alkoxysilanes hydrolysis: An empirical approach. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 17624

    2019

  18. [26]

    Review: 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane ( APTES ) deposition methods on oxide surfaces in solution and vapor phases for biosensing applications

    Sypabekova, M.; Hagemann, A.; Rho, D.; Kim, S. Review: 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane ( APTES ) deposition methods on oxide surfaces in solution and vapor phases for biosensing applications. Biosensors (Basel) 2022, 13, 36

    2022

  19. [27]

    Z.; Chen, W

    Zhu, M.; Lerum, M. Z.; Chen, W. How to prepare reproducible, homogeneous, and hydrolytically stable aminosilane-derived layers on silica. Langmuir 2012, 28, 416--423

    2012

  20. [28]

    Digital magnetic detection of biomolecular interactions with single nanoparticles

    Chen, S.; Sun, Z.; Li, W.; Yu, P.; Shi, Q.; Kong, F.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Shi, F.; Du, J. Digital magnetic detection of biomolecular interactions with single nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2023, 23, 2636--2643

    2023

  21. [29]

    G.; Mane, A

    Rozyyev, V.; Shevate, R.; Pathak, R.; Murphy, J. G.; Mane, A. U.; Sibener, S. J.; Elam, J. W. Vapor-phase grafting of functional silanes on atomic layer deposited Al2O3 . J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2023, 41, 032408

    2023

  22. [30]

    H.; Schreifels, J

    Williams, E. H.; Schreifels, J. A.; Rao, M. V.; Davydov, A. V.; Oleshko, V. P.; Lin, N. J.; Steffens, K. L.; Krylyuk, S.; Bertness, K. A.; Manocchi, A. K.; Koshka, Y. Selective streptavidin bioconjugation on silicon and silicon carbide nanowires for biosensor applications. J. ...

    2013

  23. [31]

    G.; Prince, K

    Meroni, D.; Lo Presti, L.; Di Liberto, G.; Ceotto, M.; Acres, R. G.; Prince, K. C.; Bellani, R.; Soliveri, G.; Ardizzone, S. A close look at the structure of the TiO2 - APTES interface in hybrid nanomaterials and its degradation pathway: An experimental and theoretical study. ...

    2017

  24. [32]

    [74] Spectrophotometric determination of avidin and biotin

    Green, N. [74] Spectrophotometric determination of avidin and biotin. Methods in Enzymology 1970, 18, 418--424

    1970

  25. [33]

    D.; Eslamizar, L.; Filanoski, B

    Hirsch, J. D.; Eslamizar, L.; Filanoski, B. J.; Malekzadeh, N.; Haugland, R. P.; Beechem, J. M.; Haugland, R. P. Easily reversible desthiobiotin binding to streptavidin, avidin, and other biotin-binding proteins: uses for protein labeling, detection, and isolation. Anal. Bioch...

    2002

  26. [34]

    J.; Romovacek, H.; Finn, F

    Hofmann, K.; Zhang, W. J.; Romovacek, H.; Finn, F. M.; Bothner-By, A. A.; Mishra, P. K. Syntheses of biotinylated and dethiobiotinylated insulins. Biochemistry 1984, 23, 2547--2553

    1984

  27. [35]

    A.; Finn, F

    Hofmann, K.; Titus, G.; Montibeller, J. A.; Finn, F. M. Avidin binding of carboxyl-substituted biotin and analogues. Biochemistry 1982, 21, 978--984

    1982

  28. [36]

    J.; Valden, M.; Hytönen, V

    Hynninen, V.; Vuori, L.; Hannula, M.; Tapio, K.; Lahtonen, K.; Isoniemi, T.; Lehtonen, E.; Hirsimäki, M.; Toppari, J. J.; Valden, M.; Hytönen, V. P. Improved antifouling properties and selective biofunctionalization of stainless steel by employing heterobifunctional silane-pol...

    2016

  29. [37]

    S.; Hlady, V.; Gölander, C.-G

    Lin, Y. S.; Hlady, V.; Gölander, C.-G. The surface density gradient of grafted poly (ethylene glycol): preparation, characterization and protein adsorption. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 1994, 3, 49--62

    1994

  30. [38]

    B.; Fee, C

    Damodaran, V. B.; Fee, C. J.; Popat, K. C. Modeling of PEG grafting and prediction of interfacial force profile using X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy: Modeling of PEG grafting and prediction of interfacial force profile. Surf. Interface Anal. 2012, 44, 144--149

    2012

  31. [39]

    C.; Ohlendorf, D

    Weber, P. C.; Ohlendorf, D. H.; Wendoloski, J. J.; Salemme, F. R. Structural origins of high-affinity biotin binding to streptavidin. Science 1989, 243, 85--88

    1989

  32. [40]

    E.; Lybrand, T

    Le Trong, I.; Wang, Z.; Hyre, D. E.; Lybrand, T. P.; Stayton, P. S.; Stenkamp, R. E. Streptavidin and its biotin complex at atomic resolution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2011, 67, 813--821

    2011

  33. [41]

    Binding of streptavidin to surface-attached biotin with different spacer thicknesses

    Li, Y.; Zhang, H. Binding of streptavidin to surface-attached biotin with different spacer thicknesses. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. (Mater. Sci. Ed.) 2015, 30, 1304--1309

    2015

  34. [42]

    B.; Herne, T

    Steel, A. B.; Herne, T. M.; Tarlov, M. J. Electrochemical quantitation of DNA immobilized on gold. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 4670--4677

    1998

  35. [43]

    M.; Mirkin, C

    Demers, L. M.; Mirkin, C. A.; Mucic, R. C.; Reynolds, R. A., 3rd; Letsinger, R. L.; Elghanian, R.; Viswanadham, G. A fluorescence-based method for determining the surface coverage and hybridization efficiency of thiol-capped oligonucleotides bound to gold thin films and nanopa...

    2000

  36. [44]

    W.; Heaton, R

    Peterson, A. W.; Heaton, R. J.; Georgiadis, R. M. The effect of surface probe density on DNA hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, 5163--5168

    2001

  37. [45]

    Spin relaxometry of single nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond nanocrystals for magnetic noise sensing

    Tetienne, J.-P.; Hingant, T.; Rondin, L.; Cavaillès, A.; Mayer, L.; Dantelle, G.; Gacoin, T.; Wrachtrup, J.; Roch, J.-F.; Jacques, V. Spin relaxometry of single nitrogen-vacancy defects in diamond nanocrystals for magnetic noise sensing. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 235436

    2013

  38. [46]

    R.; Ream, B.; Waugh, S

    Lu, S.; Fowler, C. R.; Ream, B.; Waugh, S. M.; Russell, T. M.; Rohloff, J. C.; Gold, L.; Cleveland, J. P.; Stoll, S. Magnetically detected protein binding using spin-labeled slow off-rate modified aptamers. ACS Sens. 2023, 8, 2219--2227

    2023

  39. [47]

    Creation efficiency of nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond

    Pezzagna, S.; Naydenov, B.; Jelezko, F.; Wrachtrup, J.; Meijer, J. Creation efficiency of nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond. New J. Phys. 2010, 12, 065017

    2010

  40. [48]

    Different fluorophore labeling strategies and designs affect millisecond kinetics of DNA hairpins

    Hartmann, A.; Krainer, G.; Schlierf, M. Different fluorophore labeling strategies and designs affect millisecond kinetics of DNA hairpins. Molecules 2014, 19, 13735--13754

    2014

  41. [49]

    E.; Connolly, B

    Sanborn, M. E.; Connolly, B. K.; Gurunathan, K.; Levitus, M. Fluorescence properties and photophysics of the sulfoindocyanine Cy3 linked covalently to DNA . J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 11064--11074

    2007

  42. [50]

    R.; Gokulrangan, G.; Lushington, G

    Unruh, J. R.; Gokulrangan, G.; Lushington, G. H.; Johnson, C. K.; Wilson, G. S. Orientational dynamics and dye- DNA interactions in a dye-labeled DNA aptamer. Biophys. J. 2005, 88, 3455--3465

    2005

  43. [51]

    A.; Muller, R

    Granato, L.; Laurent, S.; Vander Elst, L.; Djanashvili, K.; Peters, J. A.; Muller, R. N. The Gd3+ complex of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid mono(p-isothiocyanatoanilide) conjugated to inulin: a potential stable macromolecular contrast agent for MRI. C...

    2011

  44. [52]

    N.; Laurent, S

    Granato, L.; Vander Elst, L.; Henoumont, C.; Muller, R. N.; Laurent, S. Optimizing Water Exchange Rates and Rotational Mobility for High-Relaxivity of a Novel Gd-DO3A Derivative Complex Conjugated to Inulin as Macromolecular Contrast Agents for MRI. Chemistry & Biodiversity 20...

    2018

  45. [53]

    Li, H.; Meade, T. J. Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Gd(III)-Based Contrast Agents: Challenges and Key Advances. J Am Chem Soc 2019, 141, 17025--17041

    2019

  46. [54]

    H.; Belorizky, E.; Borel, A.; Helm, L.; Merbach, A

    Rast, S.; Fries, P. H.; Belorizky, E.; Borel, A.; Helm, L.; Merbach, A. E. A general approach to the electronic spin relaxation of Gd( III ) complexes in solutions. Monte Carlo simulations beyond the Redfield limit. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 7554--7563

    2001

  47. [55]

    A.; Rizzato, R.; Pershin, A.; Schepp, M

    Freire-Moschovitis, F. A.; Rizzato, R.; Pershin, A.; Schepp, M. R.; Allert, R. D.; Todenhagen, L. M.; Brandt, M. S.; Gali, A.; Bucher, D. B. The role of electrolytes in the relaxation of near-surface spin defects in Diamond. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 10474--10485

    2023

  48. [56]

    Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Gd(III)-Based Contrast Agents: Challenges and Key Advances

    Bucher, D. B.; Aude Craik, D. P. L.; Backlund, M. P.; Turner, M. J.; Ben Dor, O.; Glenn, D. R.; Walsworth, R. L. Quantum diamond spectrometer for nanoscale NMR and ESR spectroscopy. Nature Protocols 2019, 14, 2707--2747 mcitethebibliography achemso-demo.tex00006640000000000000...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.