Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 63 references

A Near-Infrared Spectral Library of Very Young Brown Dwarfs and Planetary-Mass Objects in the Orion Nebula Cluster

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new medium-resolution JHK spectral library of 25 very young brown dwarfs and planetary-mass objects in the Orion Nebula Cluster confirms their youth and shows that planetary-mass objects drain their disks quickly, within about a million y

desk verdict Genuinely useful spectral library of very young substellar objects, with an accretion-rate conclusion that outruns its calibrations. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.14035 v1 pith:PTGEWPAL submitted 2025-08-19 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

Elena Manjavacas , Mario Gennaro , Sarah Betti , Laurent Pueyo , William Balmer , Massimo Robberto This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EP
keywords browndwarfsplanetary-massobjectsOrionNebulaClusternear-infraredspectroscopyspectrallibrarymassaccretionratesprotoplanetarydiskssurfacegravityindices
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to give studies of very young brown dwarfs and planetary-mass objects what they have lacked: a medium-resolution near-infrared spectral library of objects that are both extremely young (1-3 Myr) and very low in mass (7-76 Jupiter masses). The authors observed 25 such candidates in the Orion Nebula Cluster with Keck/MOSFIRE, typed them against young and field templates (M6.0-L3.0), and used gravity-sensitive spectral indices to confirm that all 25 are very-low-surface-gravity cluster members, not background contaminants. Six objects show hydrogen emission lines (Pa-beta or Br-gamma) that mark accreting protoplanetary disks, and their accretion rates agree with 1-Myr predictions from the CASPAR compilation, supporting the paper's conclusion that planetary-mass objects deplete their disks quickly at young ages. The spectra are released publicly, including a five-object sequence that charts how a 7-10 Jupiter-mass object cools from spectral type L3 to T8 over 200 Myr.

What carries the argument

The analysis runs on two standard tools. Gravity classification uses the Allers & Liu (2013) indices — H-cont (H-band triangularity), K I J (potassium doublet strength), FeH J (iron-hydride absorption) — plus K I pseudo-equivalent widths; a median score of >=1.5 labels a target very-low-gravity (log g < 4). Accretion converts Pa-beta and Br-gamma line luminosities into accretion luminosities via power-law L_acc-L_line relations — stellar (Alcala et al. 2017) for all six accretors, planetary (Aoyama et al. 2021) for the four below the deuterium-burning limit — then M-dot assuming a 5 R* inner disk radius. Masses, temperatures, extinctions come from the empirical isochrones of Robberto et al.

What would settle it

Measure the accretion luminosity of one of the six ONC accretors (e.g., object 262 or 3251) by a route independent of the L_acc-L_line scaling — fitting the full hydrogen line profile, or detecting ultraviolet/optical veiling with JWST — and compare the resulting rate with the CASPAR 1-Myr relation. If it falls off the relation by more than the difference between the stellar and planetary calibrations, the fast-disk-depletion claim weakens. Separately, determining the inner disk radius from SED fitting rather than assuming 5 R* would test the main free parameter of the rate calculation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim: it delivers the first medium-resolution (R~3000) JHK spectral library of very young substellar objects in the Orion Nebula Cluster, masses 7-76 M_Jup. Allers & Liu (2013) gravity diagnostics classify all 25 targets as very-low-gravity, confirming their membership in the 1-3 Myr cluster. Six targets show 3-sigma Pa-beta or Br-gamma emission, unambiguous accretion tracers; converting line to accretion luminosity with stellar (Alcala et al. 2017) and planetary (Aoyama et al. 2021) relations gives accretion rates consistent with 1-Myr CASPAR predictions, so planetary-mass objects deplete their disks quickly. A five-object sequence charts spectral evolution from L3 at 1

Load-bearing premise

The disk-depletion conclusion stands on converting hydrogen line brightness into accretion rate using scaling relations calibrated on stars and a fixed 5-stellar-radius inner disk, applied to masses from an empirically adjusted isochrone; if these conversions do not hold for 7-13 Jupiter-mass objects, the rates and the depletion timing would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 25 released JHK spectra become age-benchmark templates: objects whose gravity indices fall on the ONC track can be aged near 1-3 Myr, and older field contaminants can be excluded.
  • The gravity results validate the photometric water-band selection and the empirically adjusted isochrones of Robberto et al. (2020) as a way to find planetary-mass cluster members down to ~7 M_Jup.
  • The six detections show active accretion at masses as low as 7 M_Jup; because rates match 1-Myr CASPAR predictions, these disks must be short-lived, and the ~25% disk fraction is a lower bound since cold disks are invisible in the near-infrared.
  • The L3-to-T8 object sequence (473, 2M1207b, PSO 318-22, GU Psc b, Ross 458c) gives an empirical cooling track for a 7-10 M_Jup body over ~200 Myr, a direct input for atmospheric and evolutionary models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper reports that spectral types do not always track the Robberto et al. (2020) effective temperatures; if the masses carry the same systematic offsets, the position of the six accretors on the accretion-rate-mass diagram could shift when better models arrive.
  • The paper notes Betti et al. (2023) showed stellar L_acc-L_line relations may not hold for brown dwarfs; applying the planetary relations to all six accretors (not just the four sub-deuterium objects) is a direct test of whether the fast-disk-depletion conclusion survives.
  • The fourteen targets whose K-band excess resists both disk-blackbody and extinction fits may trace dust-cloud properties unique to very low gravity; mid-infrared spectroscopy of these objects could discriminate warm inner disks from atmospheric dust.
  • Extending the same gravity-index and accretion analysis to older clusters (Upper Scorpius, alpha Persei) with the same instrumentation would complete the empirical age track that this sample only begins.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a medium-resolution (R~3000) JHK MOSFIRE spectral library of 25 young substellar objects in the Orion Nebula Cluster, with masses 7-76 M_Jup and spectral types M6.0-L3.0. The authors derive spectral types by template matching, confirm youth and cluster membership via Allers & Liu (2013) gravity indices and alkali equivalent widths, and identify six objects with Pa-beta or Br-gamma emission that they interpret as accreting protoplanetary disks. They convert line luminosities to accretion luminosities using Alcala et al. (2017) and Aoyama et al. (2021) scalings, derive mass accretion rates, and compare them with the CASPAR archive, concluding that planetary-mass objects deplete their disks quickly at young ages. They also assemble a 1-200 Myr spectral evolution sequence for a 7-10 M_Jup object. The spectra are released as data behind the figures.

Significance. The spectral library itself is a valuable community resource: it triples the number of very young (<3 Myr) substellar objects with medium-resolution near-infrared coverage, extends spectral classification to the planetary-mass boundary in a young cluster, and provides quantitative gravity indices that strengthen the empirical basis for youth diagnostics. The public release of the calibrated spectra and the clear template-matching methodology are strengths. If the accretion-rate analysis is corrected and its caveats properly incorporated, the paper would offer a useful benchmark for disk evolution in the lowest-mass regime. The current overstatement of the disk-depletion conclusion and internal inconsistencies in the emission-line identifications prevent the paper from being accepted in its present form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.1 vs Section 6.2/Table 5/Fig. 15] There is a direct contradiction about which objects show Br-gamma. Section 5.1 (K-band bullet) states that the Br-gamma line is seen 'only in object 1549', while Section 6.2, Table 5, and Fig. 15 identify object 473 as the Br-gamma source and object 469 as a Pa-beta source; the Conclusion (item 2) repeats the Table 5 assignment. This matters because the accretion luminosity for object 473 is computed from Br-gamma using different scaling coefficients than Pa-beta (Eq. 1 and Table 5). The identification must be corrected and the consequent accretion-rate values re-derived for 473 and 469.
  2. [Section 6.2, Eqs. (1)-(2), and Fig. 16] The conclusion that ONC planetary-mass objects 'deplete their disks quickly' rests on Mdot values obtained by applying L_acc-L_line scalings from Alcala et al. (2017) and Aoyama et al. (2021) with an assumed Rin=5R*. The CASPAR comparison in Fig. 16 is not an independent validation, because CASPAR is built from the same family of calibrations and the same inner-radius assumption. The paper itself notes (Section 6.2) that Betti et al. (2023) found the stellar relations may not hold for brown dwarfs. To keep the claim, the authors should either (i) provide a calibration-independent comparison (e.g., line luminosity versus mass directly), or (ii) explicitly restrict the conclusion to line-flux-based evidence and reframe the Fig. 16 agreement as a consistency check rather than confirmation.
  3. [Section 2 and Section 8; Table 1/Fig. 16 mass axis] The masses and effective temperatures used for the x-axis of Fig. 16 and for the planetary-mass classification come from Robberto et al. (2020) empirically adjusted isochrones, in a regime where the authors acknowledge BT-Settl models fail for objects below ~45 M_Jup. The paper notes the resulting 'significant uncertainties' (Section 2) and that masses may be over- or underestimated (Section 8), but the accretion-rate versus mass comparison in Fig. 16 is plotted without propagating these uncertainties. At minimum, the paper should state how the mass uncertainty affects the placement of the four planetary-mass points relative to the 1 Myr CASPAR track, and whether the 'quick depletion' conclusion would survive a factor-of-two mass shift.
  4. [Table 4] Table 4 includes object 365, which Section 2 explicitly removes from the final sample ('objects 3382, 363, 367, 365, ...'), and the table contains 26 entries while the final sample has 25 objects. This is an internal inconsistency that complicates the gravity-score summary; it should be corrected so that Table 4 matches the final sample.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The notation 'Bra-gamma' in the abstract and elsewhere should be standardized to 'Br-gamma' (e.g., 'Pa-beta' is used consistently but 'Bra' is not).
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] Typo: 'thrid field' should be 'third field'.
  3. [Section 8] Typo: 'circusmstellar disks' should be 'circumstellar disks'.
  4. [Section 5.1] The K-band bullet says Br-gamma appears only in object 1549; this is part of the contradiction listed in the major comments, but even if corrected, the sentence should be re-checked for consistency with Table 2.
  5. [Section 5.2] The phrase 'we aimed at spectral typing' is awkward; consider 'we determined spectral types by comparing'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectral library and gravity-index analysis are independent; the accretion comparison has a shared-calibration caveat but does not reduce to its own inputs.

full rationale

The core deliverables of this paper are new MOSFIRE JHK spectra, line identifications, spectral types obtained by matching external literature templates, and gravity indices computed with the Allers & Liu (2013) methodology. These are all measured quantities benchmarked against outside data, and no equation in the paper is defined in terms of the quantity it purports to establish. The accretion-rate derivation uses Eq. (1) (Alcalá+2017 stellar and Aoyama+2021 planetary L_acc–L_line calibrations) and Eq. (2) (with R_in=5R*), and the resulting Mdot values are compared to the CASPAR 1 Myr relations from Betti+2023. This is not circular in the strict sense: the ONC line fluxes are new data, the CASPAR relations are an external empirical archive, and the paper does not fit any parameter to its own targets and then rename that fit a prediction. The manuscript itself flags the main weakness: “Betti et al. (2023) has shown empirically that these [stellar relations] might not hold for brown dwarfs,” and because CASPAR is co-authored by Betti and likely draws on the same L_acc–L_line calibration family, the Fig. 16 agreement is weaker than an independent test of the disk-depletion conclusion. That is a correctness/limitation concern, not a circular reduction. The heavy reliance on Robberto+2020 masses and effective temperatures (co-authored by the present team) is an inherited systematic uncertainty, explicitly acknowledged in the text, rather than a self-definitional step. The same-author citations to Manjavacas+ template spectra and Betti+2022/2023 are used as data or benchmarks, not as unverified uniqueness theorems or smuggled ansätze. An internal inconsistency exists between Section 5.1 (Br-gamma only in object 1549) and Section 6.2/Table 5 (Br-gamma for object 473), but that is an error affecting one of the four planetary-mass points, not circularity. Overall, the library and its youth/membership confirmation are self-contained; the accretion-rate comparison carries a shared-calibration caveat but does not reduce by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's conclusions rest on standard astrophysical assumptions and on masses/Teff from the companion Robberto et al. (2020) catalog. The only parameters fitted in this paper are two blackbody disk temperatures used to reproduce K-band excess for two objects. No new physical entities are introduced; the possible disks are inferred from emission lines and K-band excess, and the 'unique atmospheric properties' hypothesis for 12 objects is speculation, not an invented entity.

free parameters (3)
  • Disk blackbody temperature for object 3251 = 250 K
    Fitted in Section 5.3 to reproduce the K-band excess when added to the OTS 44 template.
  • Disk blackbody temperature for object 3311 = 1800 K
    Fitted in Section 5.3 to reproduce the K-band excess when added to the 2MASS J11085497-763240 template.
  • Inner disk radius R_in/R* = 5
    Assumed to be 5 R* following Gullbring et al. (1998) and others, used in the mass accretion rate equation (Section 6.2). Chosen by hand, not measured.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Distance to the ONC is d=414±7 pc (Menten et al. 2007)
    Used in Section 6.2 to convert line fluxes to luminosities.
  • domain assumption Extinction law of Cardelli et al. (1989) with R_V=3.1 applies to the ONC lines of sight
    Used in Section 5.2 to deredden spectra before spectral typing.
  • domain assumption The cluster is 1-3 Myr old (Jeffries et al. 2011) and gravity indices calibrated by Allers & Liu (2013) correctly distinguish very-low-gravity young objects
    Basis for confirming youth and membership in Section 6.1.
  • domain assumption Mass and effective temperature estimates from Robberto et al. (2020), based on BT-Settl evolutionary models with an empirical isochrone adjustment, are accurate enough for the claims
    Used throughout to assign masses and compare with spectral types; the paper itself notes the models fail below 45 M_Jup and the isochrones were empirically adjusted.
  • domain assumption L_acc-L_line scaling relations from Alcala et al. (2017) and Aoyama et al. (2021) apply to substellar and planetary-mass accretors
    Used in Section 6.2 to estimate accretion luminosities; the paper cites Betti et al. (2023) showing these may not hold for brown dwarfs, but proceeds with the assumption.
  • domain assumption The spectral type templates from the cited literature are correct and can be applied to ONC objects after dereddening
    Used in Section 5.2 for spectral typing.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Near-Infrared Spectral Library of Very Young Brown Dwarfs and Planetary-Mass Objects in the Orion Nebula Cluster." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PTGEWPAL

@misc{pith2026250814035,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Near-Infrared Spectral Library of Very Young Brown Dwarfs and Planetary-Mass Objects in the Orion Nebula Cluster},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PTGEWPAL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14035}
}
read the original abstract

Age-benchmark brown dwarfs' and planetary-mass objects' spectroscopy is key to characterize substellar evolution. In this paper we present the JHK medium resolution (R~3000) spectra of 25 7-75 M_Jup (spectral types L3.0-M6.0) brown dwarfs and planetary-mass objects in the Orion Nebula Cluster obtained with MOSFIRE installed at the W. M. Keck I telescope. We obtained the spectral types of the targets in our sample using template brown dwarf and planetary-mass objects' spectra. We confirmed their extreme youth (<5 Myr) and membership to the cluster using spectral indices, and the diversity of their spectra even for targets with similar spectral types. Six of our targets presented Pa-beta and Bra-gamma emission lines, suggesting the existence of accreting protoplanetary disks to objects with masses as low as 7 M_Jup. After analyzing the emission lines of those objects, and measuring their accretion rates, we compared them to those of stars, brown dwarfs and planetary-mass objects, confirming that planetary-mass young objects deplete their disks quickly at young ages. Finally, we illustrate the spectral evolution of a 7-10 M_Jup planetary-mass object through its life from 1-3 Myr to 200 Myr old using one of our latest spectra type targets, and other targets from the literature with older age, but similar estimated masses. The spectra are publicly available for the community's use as data behind the figures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.14035 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Region files (purple) with the three fields observed (red squares) with MOSFIRE showing the positions of the objects overplotted over the ONC HST/WFC3 image from Robberto et al. (2020). The objects in black indicate our science targets, and the objects in red are stars used for aligning the MOSFIRE mask. tra in each band. Finally, we divided the spectra of the telluric star by a black body SED with the same effectiv… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Region file for the thrid field observed on the 2021 November 12 in the ONC. The objects in black indicate our science targets, and the objects in red are stars used for aligning the MOSFIRE mask. 5.1. Identification of Spectral Lines and Molecular Bands We observe the following spectral characteristics typ￾ical of brown dwarfs: • In the J band, we observe the K I doublet at around 1.169 and 1.177 µm, and at 1.2430 … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Region file for the second field observed on the 2021 October 28 in the ONC. The objects in black indicate our science targets, and the objects in red are stars used for aligning the MOSFIRE mask. the colors of each object can be observed, are shown in the Appendix A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (20 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: J-band spectra of the high-mass brown dwarfs with masses between 41 and 76 MJup. See main body dis￾cussion for significance of identified lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: H-band spectra of the high-mass brown dwarfs with masses between 41 and 76 MJup. See main body dis￾cussion for significance of identified lines. light grey line), and the Bra-γ line only in object 1549 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: H-band spectra of the intermediate-mass brown dwarfs with masses between 14 and 40 MJup.See main body discussion for significance of identified lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: J-band spectra of the planetary-mass brown dwarfs with masses between 7 and 13 MJup. See main body discussion for significance of identified lines. extinction law from Cardelli et al. (1989). After remov￾ing the extinction of the ONC cloud, we aimed at spec￾tral typin…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: K-band spectra of the intermediate-mass brown dwarfs with masses between 14 and 40 MJup. See main body discussion for significance of identified lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: H-band spectra of the planetary-mass brown dwarfs with masses between 7 and 13 MJup. See main body discussion for significance of identified lines. above in all J-, H-, and K-band simultaneously. Four￾teen of the targets had overluminous K-bands, indicat￾ing either a …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Pseudo equivalent widths (left) and spectral indices (right) calculated for our targets (red stars) following the methodology presented in Allers & Liu (2013). We include the same indices calculated for brown dwarfs and low-mass stars that are members of young moving …
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: NIR emission lines for the six accreting objects. Five show accretion from Pa-β, while one (Obj 473) shows accretion in Bra-γ (gray spectrum) In Section 5.2 we obtained spectral types spanning L3 and M6.0 for all targets using young brown dwarf and planetary-mass obje…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Mass accretion rate vs mass for the six ONC accretors (gold diamonds). The four objects with masses below the deuterium burning limit have accretion rates calculated using planetary Lacc − Lline scaling relations (gold stars). The black circles indicate the stars, bro…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: J-band spectra of the L3-T8 planetary-mass objects with masses between 7 and 10 MJup. In red is the spectrum of target 473 of our sample (1–3 Myr old). In orange is the JWST/NIRSpec spectrum of the L6 spectral type planet, 2M1207b (∼10 Myr old). In purple we show the …
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: K-band spectra of the L3-T8 planetary-mass objects with masses between 7 and 10 MJup. In red is the spectrum of target 473 of our sample (1–3 Myr old). In orange is the JWST/NIRSpec spectrum of the L6 spectral type planet, 2M1207b (∼10 Myr old). In purple we show the …
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: JHK MOSFIRE spectra of all the high-mass brown dwarfs in our sample with masses between 41 and 76 MJup [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: JHK MOSFIRE spectra of all the high-mass brown dwarfs in our sample with masses between 14 and 40 MJup [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: JHK MOSFIRE spectra of all the high-mass brown dwarfs in our sample with masses between 7 and 13 MJup [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: J-band MOSFIRE spectra of the objects showing spurious emission features before being removed (left-hand side plot), and after (right-hand side plot), and the sky lines expected overlapped to show that some of those might be introduced by an incomplete sky line remova…
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: H-band MOSFIRE spectra of the objects showing spurious emission features before being removed (left-hand side plot), and after (right-hand side plot), and the sky lines expected overlapped to show that some of those might be introduced by an incomplete sky line remova…
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: K-band MOSFIRE spectra of the objects showing spurious emission features before being removed (left-hand side plot), and after (right-hand side plot), and the sky lines expected overlapped to show that some of those might be introduced by an incomplete sky line remova…
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Best matches of our targets with templates from the literature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Best matches of our targets with templates from the literature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_27.png]
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Best matches of our targets with templates from the literature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_28.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M., Natta, A., Manara, C

    Alcal´ a, J. M., Natta, A., Manara, C. F., et al. 2014, A&A, 561, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322254 Alcal´ a, J. M., Manara, C. F., Natta, A., et al. 2017, A&A, 600, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629929

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322254 2014

  2. [2]

    2012, Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 370, 2765, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0269

    Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2012, Royal Society of London Philosophical Transactions Series A, 370, 2765, doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0269

    arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    N., & Liu, M

    Allers, K. N., & Liu, M. C. 2007, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 39, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 103.15

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    N., & Liu, M

    Allers, K. N., & Liu, M. C. 2013, ApJ, 772, 79, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/79

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/79 2013

  5. [5]

    N., Jaffe, D

    Allers, K. N., Jaffe, D. T., Luhman, K. L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 657, 511, doi: 10.1086/510845

    doi:10.1086/510845 2007

  6. [6]

    2021, ApJL, 917, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac19bd

    Aoyama, Y., Marleau, G.-D., Ikoma, M., & Mordasini, C. 2021, ApJL, 917, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac19bd

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac19bd 2021

  7. [7]

    2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2011.06608, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.06608 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Aoyama, Y., Marleau, G.-D., Mordasini, C., & Ikoma, M. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2011.06608, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2011.06608 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/...

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.06608 2020

  8. [8]

    Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. 2002, A&A, 382, 563, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011638

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011638 2002

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    2016, extinction v0.3.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.804967

    Barbary, K. 2016, extinction v0.3.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.804967

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    K., Follette, K

    Betti, S. K., Follette, K. B., Ward-Duong, K., et al. 2022, ApJL, 935, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac85ef —. 2023, AJ, 166, 262, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad06b8

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    2014, A&A, 562, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118270

    Bonnefoy, M., Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A.-M., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118270

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    2010, A&A, 512, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912688

    Bonnefoy, M., Chauvin, G., Rojo, P., et al. 2010, A&A, 512, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912688

    2010 doi

  5. [13]

    2013, A&A, 555, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220838

    Bonnefoy, M., Boccaletti, A., Lagrange, A.-M., et al. 2013, A&A, 555, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220838

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    B., Lunine, J

    Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., & Liebert, J. 2001, Reviews of Modern Physics, 73, 719, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.719

    2001 doi

  7. [15]

    A., de Burgos, A., Alonso-Floriano, F

    Caballero, J. A., de Burgos, A., Alonso-Floriano, F. J., et al. 2019, A&A, 629, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935987

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  9. [17]

    M., Dumas, C., et al

    Chauvin, G., Lagrange, A. M., Dumas, C., et al. 2005, A&A, 438, L25, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200500116

    2005 doi

  10. [18]

    L., Faherty, J., Kirkpatrick, D., & Burgasser, A

    Cruz, K. L., Faherty, J., Kirkpatrick, D., & Burgasser, A. J. 2007, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical

    2007

  11. [19]

    C., Rayner, J

    Cushing, M. C., Rayner, J. T., & Vacca, W. D. 2005, ApJ, 623, 1115, doi: 10.1086/428040

    2005 doi

  12. [20]

    C., Marley, M

    Cushing, M. C., Marley, M. S., Saumon, D., et al. 2008, ApJ, 678, 1372, doi: 10.1086/526489

    2008 doi

  13. [21]

    2012, A&A, 548, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219984

    Delorme, P., Gagn´ e, J., Malo, L., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219984

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    K., Rice, E

    Faherty, J. K., Rice, E. L., Cruz, K. L., Mamajek, E. E., & N´ u˜ nez, A. 2013, AJ, 145, 2, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/145/1/2

    2013 doi

  15. [23]

    K., Riedel, A

    Faherty, J. K., Riedel, A. R., Cruz, K. L., et al. 2016, ApJS, 225, 10, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/225/1/10

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    2020, ApJ, 896, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab911a

    Gennaro, M., & Robberto, M. 2020, ApJ, 896, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab911a

    2020 doi

  17. [25]

    2010, MNRAS, 405, 1140, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16524.x

    Greiner, J. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 1140, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16524.x

    2010

  18. [26]

    I., Meyer, M

    Gorlova, N. I., Meyer, M. R., Rieke, G. H., & Liebert, J. 2003, ApJ, 593, 1074, doi: 10.1086/376730

    2003 doi

  19. [27]

    1998, ApJ, 492, 323, doi: 10.1086/305032

    Gullbring, E., Hartmann, L., Brice˜ no, C., & Calvet, N. 1998, ApJ, 492, 323, doi: 10.1086/305032

    1998 doi

  20. [28]

    J., & Hillenbrand, L

    Herczeg, G. J., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2008, ApJ, 681, 594, doi: 10.1086/586728

    2008 doi

  21. [29]

    D., Littlefair, S

    Jeffries, R. D., Littlefair, S. P., Naylor, T., & Mayne, N. J. 2011, MNRAS, 418, 1948, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19613.x

    2011

  22. [30]

    2021, A&A, 650, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039899

    Kubiak, K., Muˇ zi´ c, K., Sousa, I., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039899

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    C., Dupuy, T

    Liu, M. C., Dupuy, T. J., & Allers, K. N. 2016, ApJ, 833, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/96

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    C., Magnier, E

    Liu, M. C., Magnier, E. A., Deacon, N. R., et al. 2013, ApJL, 777, L20, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/L20

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    2008, in Star Formation Across the Milky Way Galaxy

    Lodieu, N. 2008, in Star Formation Across the Milky Way Galaxy

    2008

  26. [34]

    C., Jameson, R

    Lodieu, N., Hambly, N. C., Jameson, R. F., & Hodgkin, S. T. 2008, MNRAS, 383, 1385, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12676.x

    2008

  27. [35]

    R., B´ ejar, V

    Lodieu, N., Zapatero Osorio, M. R., B´ ejar, V. J. S., & Pe˜ na Ram´ ırez, K. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 2020, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2279

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    J., Pascucci, I., et al

    Long, F., Herczeg, G. J., Pascucci, I., et al. 2017, ApJ, 844, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa78fc

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    Luhman, K. L. 2007, ApJS, 173, 104, doi: 10.1086/520114

    2007 doi

  30. [38]

    L., Alves de Oliveira, C., Baraffe, I., et al

    Luhman, K. L., Alves de Oliveira, C., Baraffe, I., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, 162, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b19 23

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    L., Hern´ andez, J., Downes, J

    Luhman, K. L., Hern´ andez, J., Downes, J. J., Hartmann, L., & Brice˜ no, C. 2008, ApJ, 688, 362, doi: 10.1086/592264

    2008 doi

  32. [40]

    L., Herrmann, K

    Luhman, K. L., Herrmann, K. A., Mamajek, E. E., Esplin, T. L., & Pecaut, M. J. 2018, AJ, 156, 76, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aacc6d

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    L., & Mamajek, E

    Luhman, K. L., & Mamajek, E. E. 2012, ApJ, 758, 31, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/758/1/31

    2012 doi

  34. [42]

    L., Tremblin, P., Birkmann, S

    Luhman, K. L., Tremblin, P., Birkmann, S. M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 949, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acd635

    2023 doi

  35. [43]

    Mamajek, E. E. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1385, doi: 10.1086/468181

    2005 doi

  36. [44]

    E., & Bell, C

    Mamajek, E. E., & Bell, C. P. M. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2169, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1894

    2014 doi

  37. [45]

    F., Testi, L., Herczeg, G

    Manara, C. F., Testi, L., Herczeg, G. J., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630147

    2017 doi

  38. [46]

    Manjavacas, E., Lodieu, N., B´ ejar, V. J. S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 5925, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3441

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    E., et al

    Manjavacas, E., Bonnefoy, M., Schlieder, J. E., et al. 2014, A&A, 564, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323016

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    M., et al

    Manjavacas, E., Goldman, B., Alcal´ a, J. M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 1341, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2048

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    2024, AJ, 167, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad2938

    Manjavacas, E., Tremblin, P., Birkmann, S., et al. 2024, AJ, 167, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad2938

    2024 doi

  42. [50]

    C., Lucas, P

    Marocco, F., Day-Jones, A. C., Lucas, P. W., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 372, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2463 Mart´ ın, E. C., Mace, G. N., McLean, I. S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838, 73, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6338

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    R., Kirkpatrick, J

    McGovern, M. R., Kirkpatrick, J. D., McLean, I. S., et al. 2004, ApJ, 600, 1020, doi: 10.1086/379849

    2004 doi

  44. [52]

    S., McGovern, M

    McLean, I. S., McGovern, M. R., Burgasser, A. J., et al. 2003, ApJ, 596, 561, doi: 10.1086/377636

    2003 doi

  45. [53]

    M., Reid, M

    Menten, K. M., Reid, M. J., Forbrich, J., & Brunthaler, A. 2007, A&A, 474, 515, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078247

    2007 doi

  46. [54]

    A., Lada, C

    Muench, A. A., Lada, C. J., Luhman, K. L., Muzerolle, J., & Young, E. 2007, AJ, 134, 411, doi: 10.1086/518560

    2007 doi

  47. [55]

    2014, ApJ, 787, 5, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/5

    Naud, M.-E., Artigau, ´E., Malo, L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 787, 5, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/5

    2014 doi

  48. [56]

    2024, A&A, 686, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347327

    Piscarreta, L., Muˇ zi´ c, K., Almendros-Abad, V., & Scholz, A. 2024, A&A, 686, A37, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347327

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    X., Hennawi, J., Cooke, R., et al

    Prochaska, J. X., Hennawi, J., Cooke, R., et al. 2019, pypeit/PypeIt: Releasing for DOI, 0.11.0.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3506873 —. 2020, pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0, v1.0.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.3743493

    2019 doi

  50. [58]

    2012, A&A, 548, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219832

    Rigliaco, E., Natta, A., Testi, L., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219832

    2012 doi

  51. [59]

    M., & Espaillat, C

    Rilinger, A. M., & Espaillat, C. C. 2021, ApJ, 921, 182, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac09e5

    2021 doi

  52. [60]

    G., et al

    Robberto, M., Gennaro, M., Ubeira Gabellini, M. G., et al. 2020, ApJ, 896, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab911e

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    P., Todorov, K

    Stolker, T., Quanz, S. P., Todorov, K. O., et al. 2020, A&A, 635, A182, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937159 Su´ arez, G., Vos, J. M., Metchev, S., Faherty, J. K., & Cruz, K. 2023, ApJL, 954, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acec4b

    2020 doi

  54. [62]

    M., Allers, K

    Vos, J. M., Allers, K. N., & Biller, B. A. 2017, ApJ, 842, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa73cf

    2017 doi

  55. [63]

    J., Lucas, P

    Weights, D. J., Lucas, P. W., Roche, P. F., Pinfield, D. J., & Riddick, F. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 817, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14096.x 24 APPENDIX A.ALL MOSFIRE SPECTRA OF OUR SAMPLE Here we show all the MOSFIRE spectra that we obtained in our sample. Some of the spectra were...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.