Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

An Uncertainty Visualization Framework for Large-Scale Cardiovascular Flow Simulations: A Case Study on Aortic Stenosis

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spatially resolved uncertainty maps for stenosed-aorta simulations show the turbulent jet downstream is the wobbling region, while the high-shear throat stays stable.

desk verdict Worth a referee for the engineering and validation, but the uncertainty maps rest on a sampling/statistical mismatch that needs correcting before the UQ claims are credible. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15420 v1 pith:2SLBB2XV submitted 2025-08-21 physics.flu-dyn physics.bio-phphysics.comp-ph

Xiao Xue , Tushar M. Athawale , Jon W. S. McCullough , Sharp C. Y. Lo , Ioannis Zacharoudiou , Balint Joo , Antigoni Georgiadou , Peter V. Coveney This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dynphysics.bio-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords uncertaintyquantificationvisualizationlarge-eddysimulationlatticeBoltzmannmethodhemodynamicsaorticstenosiswallshearstressensemble
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds a three-dimensional uncertainty-reporting layer for patient-specific cardiovascular flow simulations, demonstrated on a stenosed aorta. Instead of summarizing ensemble spread with one-dimensional error bars, it computes, for every cell near the vessel, the probability distribution over local isosurface topologies and renders two derived quantities—information-theoretic entropy and isosurface-crossing probability—directly on the anatomy. Two sources of variability are probed: the inlet peak velocity and the coefficient of the subgrid-scale turbulence model. The findings are spatially sharp: inlet-velocity variation produces its greatest uncertainty downstream of the stenosis where the jet turns turbulent; turbulence-coefficient variation barely moves the large-scale pressure field but does raise wall-shear-stress uncertainty in high-shear zones; and the stenosis throat stays low-entropy in all runs. If correct, the framework gives clinicians a direct visual read of where a simulation can be believed, and identifies the elevated wall shear stress at the throat as a robust marker.

What carries the argument

The work is carried by the probabilistic marching-cubes topology distribution. In each grid cell, the eight vertex values across the ensemble are treated as independent Gaussian random variables with the ensemble mean and variance; the 256 sign configurations of a chosen isovalue define a probability distribution over local isosurface topologies. Two scalars are derived from this distribution—information-theoretic entropy (how spread out the topology distribution is) and isosurface-crossing probability (how likely the isosurface passes through the cell)—and rendered directly on the vessel geometry. This turns an ensemble of volume fields into a single spatial map of positional uncertainty.

What would settle it

Run an independent Monte Carlo or quasi-Monte Carlo ensemble of 50–100 full simulations over the same inlet-velocity and turbulence-coefficient ranges on the same stenosis geometry, and recompute the entropy and isosurface-crossing probability maps. If the high-entropy region downstream of the stenosis shifts, shrinks, or disappears, the reported localization is an artifact of the small ensemble; if the low-entropy throat persists, the robust-throat claim survives.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a tractable, spatially resolved uncertainty analysis can be attached to high-Reynolds-number lattice Boltzmann simulations of patient-specific vascular flow. The paper validates its large-eddy-simulation pipeline against experimental and direct-numerical-simulation channel-flow data, then runs two ensembles on a stenosed aorta: one varying the inlet peak velocity, one varying the subgrid-scale viscosity coefficient. For both, it computes, at every grid cell, the distribution over the 256 possible marching-cubes sign patterns of a chosen isosurface and derives entropy and isosurface-crossing probability. The result: inlet-velocity uncertainty localizes downstream of

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the entropy and crossing-probability maps are faithful summaries of variability, which requires the ensemble to be large enough and run as described; however, the paper's sampling description is internally inconsistent—Section II.D.1's formula gives 3 quadrature nodes for the stated one-dimensional second-order case, while Sections IV.B and IV.C report 17 and 6 runs—so with only 6 runs the variance and entropy estimates are statistically noisy

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A clinician or modeler can point to a region of the anatomy and read off whether the predicted pressure or wall shear stress is stable across plausible input variations.
  • The low-entropy throat suggests that identifying elevated wall shear stress at the stenosis is robust even when inlet velocity and turbulence parameters are uncertain.
  • Because turbulence-coefficient uncertainty acts mainly during accelerating and decelerating phases, single-time-point simulations may understate or miss its effect.
  • The same pipeline generalizes to other vascular domains and flow regimes, so the spatial uncertainty-quantification method is not specific to aortic stenosis.
  • Entropy and crossing-probability maps can replace or supplement one-dimensional error bars for communicating sensitivity to non-experts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Testable extension: a bootstrap or split-half analysis over the existing ensemble members would show whether the reported entropy patterns are stable at 6–17 runs; with so few members the variance estimates are noisy.
  • Implication left implicit: the low-entropy throat result could serve as a cheap quality-control diagnostic—if a patient-specific simulation shows high entropy at the stenosis throat, the mesh or boundary conditions may need refinement before clinical use.
  • The same entropy-on-isosurface machinery could be applied to derived clinical metrics such as oscillatory shear index or time-averaged wall shear stress, not just raw pressure and wall shear stress, to expose where those derived predictions are trustworthy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a framework for uncertainty quantification and visualization of lattice Boltzmann (HemeLB) simulations of high-Reynolds-number aortic flow, demonstrated on a patient-specific stenosed aorta. The workflow uses EasyVVUQ for parameter sampling, executes ensembles on the Frontier supercomputer, and maps entropy and isosurface-crossing probability onto 3D vascular geometries. Two uncertain parameters are studied: inlet peak velocity (17-run ensemble) and the Smagorinsky constant (6-run ensemble). The main findings are that inlet-velocity variation produces high uncertainty downstream of the stenosis, while the Smagorinsky constant has localized effects on WSS; the stenotic throat shows low entropy in both cases. The LES implementation is validated against turbulent channel-flow PIV and DNS data.

Significance. If the statistical foundation were sound, this would be a valuable demonstration of exascale-scale ensemble UQ combined with spatially interpretable uncertainty visualization for cardiovascular flow. The LES validation against PIV and DNS is a genuine strength, and the use of Frontier for a 17-member hemodynamic ensemble is noteworthy. The proposed framework addresses a real need: moving from 1D UQ summaries to anatomy-linked uncertainty maps. However, the key UQ metrics rest on a sampling and statistical treatment that is internally inconsistent and, as presented, does not support the quantitative claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II.D.1 vs. IV.B/IV.C] The sampling description is internally inconsistent. Section II.D.1 states N_q=(p_o+1)^d; with d=1 and p_o=2 this gives 3 Gauss–Legendre quadrature nodes. Section IV.B reports a 17-run ensemble for v_max, and Section IV.C reports a 6-run ensemble for C_smag, with no explanation for the discrepancy. Every downstream metric (entropy, crossing probability) uses these runs as the ensemble, so it is unclear whether the statistics are based on 3, 6, or 17 samples, or on what node set. This must be resolved before the UQ maps can be interpreted.
  2. [Section II.D.2, Eqs. (10)–(12)] The entropy and isosurface-crossing probability computations treat ensemble members as random samples, using unweighted sample mean and standard deviation. But the runs are generated as deterministic quadrature nodes (Section II.D.1). Unweighted sample statistics do not estimate moments of the uniform input distribution, and the quadrature weights in Eq. (9) are never used in the visualization step. Moreover, with only 3–6 nodes the sample variance is highly noisy, so the statement in Section IV.B that these metrics are 'independent of the number of ensemble runs' is incorrect. The low-entropy-at-throat result and the downstream high-entropy pattern may be sensitive to the particular node set and sample size. Please recompute using a proper Monte Carlo ensemble, or weighted quadrature moments, and provide confidence or convergence checks on the entropy estimates.
  3. [Section II.D.2, Eqs. (10)–(12)] The independent Gaussian model per vertex is a strong assumption that is neither stated as an approximation nor verified. Topology-case probabilities are computed as products of vertex CDFs, which ignores spatial correlation between neighboring vertices. In a hemodynamic flow field, adjacent vertices in high-shear regions are likely correlated, so the 256-case topology distribution may be biased. Since the central qualitative conclusions depend on these entropy and probability maps, a sensitivity analysis (e.g., comparison with covariance-aware methods, or with larger ensembles) is needed to establish that the observed patterns are not artifacts of the independence assumption and small sample size.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section II.A] Minor grammar: 'We employs a three-dimensional...' should be 'We employ'. Also in Section III.A, 'the vertical velocity component u_rms' should likely be v_rms.
  2. [Section IV.A] Typo: 'iso-surface likelyhood' should be 'iso-surface likelihood'.
  3. [Section IV.B] The text describing Fig. 4 contains repeated sentences and minor grammatical issues (e.g., 'Panels (f) show'). A careful editorial pass would improve readability.
  4. [Section II.C] The sponge layer parameters (p_s=1000, w_width) are introduced as fixed; it would be helpful to state explicitly why these are not included as uncertain parameters in the UQ study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: uncertainty metrics are computed directly from ensemble outputs and the LES component is validated against independent DNS/PIV.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The uncertainty maps in Figs. 4–6 are produced by the published probabilistic-isosurface pipeline (Athawale et al.; Pöthkow et al.) directly from the ensemble output fields: per-vertex sample mean/standard deviation, Gaussian CDF (Eq. 10), marching-cubes topology probabilities, entropy E(q) (Eq. 11), and crossing probability I(q) (Eq. 12). No quantity in this chain is fitted to reproduce the reported entropy or crossing-probability maps, and no input parameter is calibrated from these outputs. The LES component is vetted against independent DNS (Kim et al.) and PIV (Ding et al.), providing external grounding beyond the present paper's fitted values. Citations to EasyVVUQ, HemeLB, and the Athawale visualization framework are standard tool/method references by overlapping authors; they are not invoked as uniqueness theorems or as proof of the target claim. The paper's reported ensemble sizes (17 and 6) are inconsistent with the stated PCE quadrature relation N_q=(p_o+1)^d=3 for d=1,p_o=2, and the use of deterministic quadrature nodes as unweighted sample statistics can bias variance estimates; however, these are statistical-validity concerns, not circularity, because the entropy values are still emergent outputs of the ensemble rather than predetermined by the inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of user-chosen parameters (ranges, PCE order, isovalues, resolution) and on standard modeling assumptions (LBM, LES, Gaussian per-vertex statistics). No new physical entities are introduced. The most fragile piece is the PCE order and ensemble sizes, which are not verified to be sufficient.

free parameters (6)
  • Inlet peak velocity range = [0.4, 1.1] m/s
    Chosen to represent clinical variability; not derived from data.
  • Smagorinsky constant range = [0.01, 1.0]
    Spans typical to extreme values; affects the uncertainty magnitude.
  • PCE order p_o = 2
    User-specified; controls number of quadrature nodes and surrogate accuracy.
  • Sponge layer parameters = p_s=1000, w_width
    Set to damp outlet reflections; affects stability and possibly flow near outlets.
  • Isosurface isovalues = p=96 mmHg, tau_w=1.5, 3.0, 0.3
    Chosen for visualization; the conclusions about low entropy at the throat may depend on these values.
  • Lattice resolution = 100 um
    Coarser than the 20 um needed for BGK; the LES model is used to compensate, which could affect accuracy.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Lattice Boltzmann equation and D3Q19 model
    Section II.A presents the governing equations as background.
  • domain assumption Smagorinsky LES with effective viscosity
    Section II.B assumes the Smagorinsky model captures subgrid-scale effects at 100 um.
  • ad hoc to paper Polynomial chaos expansion with order 2 is sufficient
    Sections IV.B and IV.C set p_o=2 without convergence checks.
  • ad hoc to paper Independent Gaussian model per vertex for isosurface probability
    Section II.D.2 assumes the ensemble values at each vertex are independent Gaussians; no spatial correlation is modeled.
  • domain assumption Patient-specific geometry is representative
    The thoracic aorta model [49] is used without sensitivity to geometry.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Uncertainty Visualization Framework for Large-Scale Cardiovascular Flow Simulations: A Case Study on Aortic Stenosis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2SLBB2XV

@misc{pith2026250815420,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Uncertainty Visualization Framework for Large-Scale Cardiovascular Flow Simulations: A Case Study on Aortic Stenosis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2SLBB2XV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15420}
}
read the original abstract

We present a generalizable uncertainty quantification (UQ) and visualization framework for lattice Boltzmann method simulations of high Reynolds number vascular flows, demonstrated on a patient-specific stenosed aorta. The framework combines EasyVVUQ for parameter sampling with large-eddy simulation turbulence modeling in HemeLB, and executes ensembles on the Frontier exascale supercomputer. Spatially resolved metrics, including entropy and isosurface-crossing probability, are used to map uncertainty in pressure and wall shear stress fields directly onto vascular geometries. Two sources of model variability are examined: inlet peak velocity and the Smagorinsky constant. Inlet velocity variation produces high uncertainty downstream of the stenosis where turbulence develops, while upstream regions remain stable. Smagorinsky constant variation has little effect on the large-scale pressure field but increases WSS uncertainty in localized high-shear regions. In both cases, the stenotic throat manifests low entropy, indicative of robust identification of elevated WSS. By linking quantitative UQ measures to three-dimensional anatomy, the framework improves interpretability over conventional 1D UQ plots and supports clinically relevant decision-making, with broad applicability to vascular flow problems requiring both accuracy and spatial insight.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explainable quantum-compressed machine learning for complex fluid flows

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hybrid quantum-classical surrogate compresses the latent time-stepping operator of flow models to as few as 8 trainable parameters and achieves stable long rollouts via exact unitarity, matching a classical baseline...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 12(2), 109--129 (1998)

    Adams, N.A.: Direct numerical simulation of turbulent compression ramp flow. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 12(2), 109--129 (1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 187, 105312 (2020)

    Afrouzi, H.H., Ahmadian, M., Hosseini, M., Arasteh, H., Toghraie, D., Rostami, S.: Simulation of blood flow in arteries with aneurysm: Lattice Boltzmann Approach (LBM) . Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 187, 105312 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    In: 2021 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS)

    Athawale, T.M., Sane, S., Johnson, C.R.: Uncertainty visualization of the marching squares and marching cubes topology cases. In: 2021 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS). pp. 106--110 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 14(6), 2867--2880 (2018)

    Bhati, A.P., Wan, S., Hu, Y., Sherborne, B., Coveney, P.V.: Uncertainty quantification in alchemical free energy methods. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 14(6), 2867--2880 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Physical Review Letters 93(6), 064502 (2004)

    Biferale, L., Boffetta, G., Celani, A., Devenish, B., Lanotte, A., Toschi, F.: Multifractal statistics of Lagrangian velocity and acceleration in turbulence . Physical Review Letters 93(6), 064502 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [6]

    In: Chen, M., Hagen, H., Hansen, C., Johnson, C.R., Kauffman, A

    Bonneau, G., Hege, H., Johnson, C.R., Oliveira, M., Potter, K., Rheingans, P., Schultz, T.: Overview and State-of-the-Art of Uncertainty Visualization . In: Chen, M., Hagen, H., Hansen, C., Johnson, C.R., Kauffman, A. (eds.) Scientific Visualization: Uncertainty, Multifield, Biomedical, and Scalable Visualization, pp. 3--27. Springer London (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    In: Dill, J., Earnshaw, R., Kasik, D., Vince, J., Wong, P.C

    Brodlie, K., Osorio, R.A., Lopes, A.: A review of uncertainty in data visualization. In: Dill, J., Earnshaw, R., Kasik, D., Vince, J., Wong, P.C. (eds.) Expanding the Frontiers of Visual Analytics and Visualization, pp. 81--109. Springer London (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    AIAA journal 17(12), 1293--1313 (1979)

    Chapman, D.R.: Computational aerodynamics development and outlook. AIAA journal 17(12), 1293--1313 (1979)

    work page 1979

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering 29(6), 698--721 (2013)

    Chen, P., Quarteroni, A., Rozza, G.: Simulation-based uncertainty quantification of human arterial network hemodynamics. International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering 29(6), 698--721 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    In: AIP Conference Proceedings

    Chiappini, D., Xue, X., Falcucci, G., Sbragaglia, M.: Ligament break-up simulation through pseudo-potential lattice B oltzmann method. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. vol. 1978, p. 420003. AIP Publishing (2018)

    1978

  3. [11]

    Physics of Fluids 24(1), 011702 (2012)

    Choi, H., Moin, P.: Grid-point requirements for large eddy simulation: Chapman's estimates revisited. Physics of Fluids 24(1), 011702 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Tukey's Exploratory Data Analysis

    Church, R.M.: How to look at data: A review of John W. Tukey's Exploratory Data Analysis . J Exp Anal Behav 31(3), 433--440 (May 1979). doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.31-433

    1979 doi

  5. [13]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 379(2197), 20200409 (2021)

    Coveney, P.V., Groen, D., Hoekstra, A.G.: Reliability and reproducibility in computational science: Implementing validation, verification and uncertainty quantification in silico . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 379(2197), 20200409 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Oxford University Press (2025)

    Coveney, P.V., Wan, S.: Molecular Dynamics: Probability and Uncertainty. Oxford University Press (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Physics of Fluids 33(3) (2021)

    Ding, G., Choi, K.S., Ma, B., Kato, T., Yuan, W.: Transitional pulsatile flows with stenosis in a two-dimensional channel. Physics of Fluids 33(3) (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Nature Computational Science 1(2), 128--135 (2021)

    Edeling, W., Arabnejad, H., Sinclair, R., Suleimenova, D., Gopalakrishnan, K., Bosak, B., Groen, D., Mahmood, I., Crommelin, D., Coveney, P.V.: The impact of uncertainty on predictions of the covidsim epidemiological code. Nature Computational Science 1(2), 128--135 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Handbook of numerical analysis 7, 713--1018 (2000)

    Eymard, R., Gallou \"e t, T., Herbin, R.: Finite volume methods. Handbook of numerical analysis 7, 713--1018 (2000)

    2000

  10. [18]

    Scientific Reports 10(1), 9508 (2020)

    Feiger, B., Gounley, J., Adler, D., Leopold, J.A., Draeger, E.W., Chaudhury, R., Ryan, J., Pathangey, G., Winarta, K., Frakes, D., et al.: Accelerating massively parallel hemodynamic models of coarctation of the aorta using neural networks. Scientific Reports 10(1), 9508 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Computer Physics Communications 283, 108596 (2023)

    Groen, D., Arabnejad, H., Suleimenova, D., Edeling, W., Raffin, E., Xue, Y., Bronik, K., Monnier, N., Coveney, P.V.: Fabsim3: An automation toolkit for verified simulations using high performance computing. Computer Physics Communications 283, 108596 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Frontiers in Physiology 9, 721 (2018)

    Groen, D., Richardson, R.A., Coy, R., Schiller, U.D., Chandrashekar, H., Robertson, F., Coveney, P.V.: Validation of patient-specific cerebral blood flow simulation using transcranial doppler measurements. Frontiers in Physiology 9, 721 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    In: Fluid Dynamics Conference

    Guo, Y., Kleiser, L., Adams, N.: A comparison study of an improved temporal DNS and spatial DNS of compressible boundary layer transition. In: Fluid Dynamics Conference. p. 2371 (1994)

    1994

  14. [22]

    Pattern formation and lattice gas automata pp

    Hou, S., Sterling, J., Chen, S., Doolen, G.: A lattice B oltzmann subgrid model for high R eynolds number flows. Pattern formation and lattice gas automata pp. 151--166 (1995)

    1995

  15. [23]

    IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 23(5), 6--10 (Sept-Oct 2003)

    Johnson, C.R., Sanderson, A.R.: A next step: Visualizing errors and uncertainty. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 23(5), 6--10 (Sept-Oct 2003). doi:10.1109/MCG.2003.1231171

    2003 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Journal of Visualization 24(5), 861--890 (May 2021)

    Kamal, A., Dhakal, P., Javaid, A.Y., Devabhaktuni, V.K., Kaur, D., Zaientz, J., Marinier, R.: Recent advances and challenges in uncertainty visualization: a survey. Journal of Visualization 24(5), 861--890 (May 2021). doi:10.1007/s12650-021-00755-1

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    EPL (Europhysics Letters) 47(2), 182 (1999)

    Karlin, I.V., Ferrante, A., \"O ttinger, H.C.: Perfect entropy functions of the lattice B oltzmann method. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 47(2), 182 (1999)

    1999

  18. [26]

    Journal of fluid mechanics 177, 133--166 (1987)

    Kim, J., Moin, P., Moser, R.: Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low reynolds number. Journal of fluid mechanics 177, 133--166 (1987)

    1987

  19. [27]

    Journal of biomechanics 46(2), 299--306 (2013)

    Kim, S.K., Na, Y., Kim, J.I., Chung, S.K.: Patient specific CFD models of nasal airflow: overview of methods and challenges . Journal of biomechanics 46(2), 299--306 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 94(3), 495--512 (2015)

    Koda, Y., Lien, F.S.: The lattice B oltzmann method implemented on the gpu to simulate the turbulent flow over a square cylinder confined in a channel. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 94(3), 495--512 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    Physical review E 61(6), 6546 (2000)

    Lallemand, P., Luo, L.S.: Theory of the lattice B oltzmann method: Dispersion, dissipation, isotropy, G alilean invariance, and stability. Physical review E 61(6), 6546 (2000)

    2000

  22. [30]

    Journal of the Royal Society Interface 21(213), 20230656 (2024)

    Lo, S.C., McCullough, J.W., Xue, X., Coveney, P.V.: Uncertainty quantification of the impact of peripheral arterial disease on abdominal aortic aneurysms in blood flow simulations. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 21(213), 20230656 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 446, 118185 (2025)

    Lo, S.C., Zingaro, A., McCullough, J.W., Xue, X., Gonzalez-Martin, P., Joo, B., V \'a zquez, M., Coveney, P.V.: A multi-component, multi-physics computational model for solving coupled cardiac electromechanics and vascular haemodynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics a...

    2025

  24. [32]

    Computer Physics Communications 178(12), 894--914 (2008)

    Mazzeo, M.D., Coveney, P.V.: HemeLB: A high performance parallel lattice-Boltzmann code for large scale fluid flow in complex geometries . Computer Physics Communications 178(12), 894--914 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    Scientific Reports 13(1), 21665 (2023)

    McCullough, J.W., Coveney, P.V.: High resolution simulation of basilar artery infarct and flow within the circle of Willis . Scientific Reports 13(1), 21665 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Physical Review E 89(2), 023303 (2014)

    Nash, R.W., Carver, H.B., Bernabeu, M.O., Hetherington, J., Groen, D., Kr \"u ger, T., Coveney, P.V.: Choice of boundary condition for lattice-Boltzmann simulation of moderate-Reynolds-number flow in complex domains . Physical Review E 89(2), 023303 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Trends in Food Science & Technology 17(11), 600--620 (2006)

    Norton, T., Sun, D.W.: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)--an effective and efficient design and analysis tool for the food industry: a review . Trends in Food Science & Technology 17(11), 600--620 (2006)

    2006

  28. [36]

    Computers & Fluids 268, 106108 (2024)

    O’Connor, J., Laizet, S., Wynn, A., Edeling, W., Coveney, P.V.: Quantifying uncertainties in direct numerical simulations of a turbulent channel flow. Computers & Fluids 268, 106108 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    In: Computer Graphics Forum

    P \"o thkow, K., Weber, B., Hege, H.C.: Probabilistic marching cubes. In: Computer Graphics Forum. vol. 30, pp. 931--940. Wiley Online Library (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    In: Dienstfrey, A.M., Boisvert, R.F

    Potter, K., Rosen, P., Johnson, C.R.: From quantification to visualization: A taxonomy of uncertainty visualization approaches. In: Dienstfrey, A.M., Boisvert, R.F. (eds.) Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Computing, pp. 226--249. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Hei...

    2012 doi

  31. [39]

    New York 27(14) (1993)

    Reddy, J.N.: An introduction to the finite element method. New York 27(14) (1993)

    1993

  32. [40]

    Journal of Open Research Software 8(1) (2020)

    Richardson, R.A., Wright, D.W., Edeling, W., Jancauskas, V., Lakhlili, J., Coveney, P.V.: Easyvvuq: a library for verification, validation and uncertainty quantification in high performance computing. Journal of Open Research Software 8(1) (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 16(1), 2142--2155 (2022)

    Shao, X., Santasmasas, M.C., Xue, X., Niu, J., Davidson, L., Revell, A.J., Yao, H.D.: Near-wall modeling of forests for atmosphere boundary layers using lattice B oltzmann method on GPU . Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 16(1), 2142--2155 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    the basic experiment

    Smagorinsky, J.: General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. the basic experiment. Monthly Weather Review 91(3), 99--164 (1963)

    1963

  35. [43]

    In: 30th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit

    Spalart, P., Allmaras, S.: A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In: 30th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. p. 439 (1992)

    1992

  36. [44]

    SIAM (2004)

    Strikwerda, J.C.: Finite difference schemes and partial differential equations. SIAM (2004)

    2004

  37. [45]

    Oxford University Press (2001)

    Succi, S.: The L attice B oltzmann E quation for F luid D ynamics and B eyond. Oxford University Press (2001)

    2001

  38. [46]

    In: 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition

    Tracey, B., Duraisamy, K., Alonso, J.: Application of supervised learning to quantify uncertainties in turbulence and combustion modeling. In: 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition. p. 259 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 379(2197), 20200082 (2021)

    Wan, S., Sinclair, R.C., Coveney, P.V.: Uncertainty quantification in classical molecular dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 379(2197), 20200082 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25(9), 2853--2872 (2019)

    Wang, J., Hazarika, S., Li, C., Shen, H.W.: Visualization and visual analysis of ensemble data: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25(9), 2853--2872 (2019). doi:10.1109/TVCG.2018.2853721

    2019

  41. [49]

    Journal of Medical Devices 7(4) (12 2013)

    Wilson, N.M., Ortiz, A.K., Johnson, A.B.: The Vascular Model Repository: A Public Resource of Medical Imaging Data and Blood Flow Simulation Results . Journal of Medical Devices 7(4) (12 2013). doi:10.1115/1.4025983, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025983

    2013 doi

  42. [50]

    In: International Conference on Computational Science

    Xue, X., McCullough, J.W., Lo, S.C., Zacharoudiou, I., Jo \'o , B., Coveney, P.V.: The lattice Boltzmann based large eddy simulations for the stenosis of the aorta . In: International Conference on Computational Science. pp. 408--420. Springer Nature Switzerland (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Physical Review E 98(1), 012802 (2018)

    Xue, X., Sbragaglia, M., Biferale, L., Toschi, F.: Effects of thermal fluctuations in the fragmentation of a nanoligament. Physical Review E 98(1), 012802 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Communications Physics 7(1), 338 (2024)

    Xue, X., Wang, S., Yao, H.D., Davidson, L., Coveney, P.V.: Physics informed data-driven near-wall modelling for lattice Boltzmann simulation of high Reynolds number turbulent flows . Communications Physics 7(1), 338 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Physics of Fluids 34(5), 055118 (2022)

    Xue, X., Yao, H.D., Davidson, L.: Synthetic turbulence generator for lattice B oltzmann method at the interface between RANS and LES . Physics of Fluids 34(5), 055118 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Physics of Fluids 33(1), 015108 (2021)

    Yang, X.I., Griffin, K.P.: Grid-point and time-step requirements for direct numerical simulation and large-eddy simulation. Physics of Fluids 33(1), 015108 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Computer Physics Communications 282, 108548 (2023)

    Zacharoudiou, I., McCullough, J., Coveney, P.: Development and performance of a HemeLB GPU code for human-scale blood flow simulation . Computer Physics Communications 282, 108548 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.