Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 47 references

PyTOD: Programmable Task-Oriented Dialogue with Execution Feedback

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a one-state differential equation model of a molecular switch is exactly solvable and has the convergence and fading-memory properties needed for stable neuromorphic computation.

desk verdict What you need to know: the submitted document is two different papers — PyTOD's abstract paired with a molecular-switch paper's body — so it's unreviewable as-is. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15456 v1 pith:Y5XG2VYW submitted 2025-08-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL MSC 34A0534D2392B20
keywords molecularswitchneuromorphiccomputingexactsolutionfadingmemoryconvergencedynamicalsystemssynapticbehaviorrecurrentneuralnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies a single-equation model of a molecular switch that was built to behave like a brain synapse. It proves the model is exactly solvable, so the device's behavior can be computed in closed form rather than by numerical integration. The paper also shows the model has convergence and fading memory, the two properties that let a nonlinear dynamical system process time-varying signals stably. If correct, this gives theoretical support for using molecular switches as computational units in layered or recurrent neuromorphic architectures, and it opens the door to fitting the same type of exactly solvable model to other physical devices.

What carries the argument

The key object is the input-driven one-state differential equation that is linear in the state and nonlinear in the input. Because the state enters linearly, the equation is exactly solvable: the solution is a convolution-type integral of the nonlinear input against an exponential kernel. This explicit solution is what enables the proofs of convergence and fading memory—the exponential kernel guarantees that old inputs decay in influence, while the nonlinearity, under boundedness and smoothness conditions, keeps the state bounded and drives it to a well-defined response. The machinery thus turns a synapse-like switching device into a well-behaved dynamical system.

What would settle it

Apply a sequence of voltage pulses to the real molecular switch and compare the measured internal state trajectory with the closed-form solution of the one-state model. If the trajectory deviates systematically with input amplitude, or shows a second relaxation timescale, the single-state representation fails. A simpler check: hold the input fixed at several amplitudes and see whether the switch always settles to the same unique steady state; hysteresis or multiple stable states would contradict the convergence property.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the one-state input-driven differential equation—linear in the state, nonlinear in the input—admits an exact closed-form solution, and inherits from that structure the mathematical properties of convergence and fading memory. Convergence means the system's state settles to a well-defined response rather than diverging or becoming chaotic; fading memory means the output is dominated by recent inputs, with older influences decaying over time. Together these properties are precisely what allow nonlinear dynamical systems to handle time-varying inputs without instability. The paper therefore establishes that the molecular switch, originally built as a synapse mimic,

Load-bearing premise

The proofs take as given that the real molecular switch described in reference [11] is faithfully represented by a single one-state equation that is linear in the state and nonlinear in the input; if the physical device has extra internal states, slower timescales, or unmodeled nonlinearities, the convergence and fading-memory guarantees do not transfer to the hardware. The supplied text also does not state the boundedness and smoothness conditions the proofs require.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Molecular switches can be deployed as computational units in deep layered feedforward and recurrent neuromorphic architectures with a theoretical guarantee of stable sequential processing.
  • Because the model is exactly solvable, simulations of large networks built from these switches can be computed directly from closed-form expressions, avoiding costly numerical integration.
  • The convergence and fading-memory properties make the switch suitable for tasks that require stable response to time-varying inputs, such as temporal pattern recognition and sequence learning.
  • The result generalizes to any physical device that can be fitted to the same linear-in-state, nonlinear-in-input form, providing a template for building exactly solvable models of other brain-inspired hardware.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: other two-terminal molecular or memristive devices whose response is naturally linear in an internal state and nonlinear in applied voltage could inherit the same guarantees, so the proof may transfer to a whole class of hardware.
  • The fading-memory property suggests the switch could be used in reservoir-computing schemes as the nonlinear readout layer, letting the recurrent part be replaced by a passive dynamical system with known stability.
  • Since the solution is an integral of the nonlinear input against an exponential kernel, hardware designers could precompute or approximate the nonlinearity to build an efficient analog or digital implementation with guaranteed stability.
  • If the input amplitude exceeds the boundedness conditions assumed in the proofs, the guarantees may fail, so a natural next step is to map the exact input range over which convergence and fading memory hold for the real device.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. Per the submission metadata, the paper under review is 'PyTOD: Programmable Task-Oriented Dialogue with Execution Feedback' (arXiv:2508.15456), whose abstract claims a code-generation agent for dialogue state tracking, with policy/execution feedback and constrained decoding, achieving state-of-the-art accuracy on the SGD benchmark. The supplied full text, however, is the first page of a different paper, arXiv:2508.15451v1, 'A Solvable Molecular Switch Model for Stable Temporal Information Processing' by Nurdin and Nijhuis, a dynamical-systems contribution with no relation to dialogue systems. That excerpt's abstract asserts exact solvability, convergence, and fading memory for a one-state molecular-switch ODE, but the page ends mid-sentence in Section 1. No part of the supplied body concerns task-oriented dialogue, code generation, constrained decoding, execution feedback, or the SGD experiments. As received, the submission therefore contains none of the content needed to evaluate its declared central claim.

Significance. The declared contribution—an execution-aware, code-generating approach to dialogue state tracking with constrained decoding and reported SOTA results on SGD—would be a practically useful, if incremental, contribution to the task-oriented dialogue community if the experiments and method were actually present. However, because the supplied text contains no PyTOD material whatsoever, significance cannot be awarded on the evidence provided. The attached molecular-switch excerpt likewise cannot be credited for its three mathematical claims (exact solvability, convergence, fading memory), which are asserted in its abstract but not demonstrated in the one supplied page. No reproducible code, data, proofs, or parameter-free derivations accompany the submission. Any assessment of significance must be deferred until the correct manuscript is provided.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract vs. Full Text] The submission is self-inconsistent as an object: the title/abstract describe PyTOD (arXiv:2508.15456), a dialogue-state-tracking agent, while the supplied full text is the first page of arXiv:2508.15451v1 ('A Solvable Molecular Switch Model...'), with different authors and a different abstract. Not one sentence of the supplied body concerns task-oriented dialogue, code generation, constrained decoding, execution feedback, or the SGD benchmark. Consequently the abstract's headline claims—state-of-the-art tracking accuracy and robust user goal estimation (Abstract, sentences 4–5)—are entirely unsupported by any method description, experimental setup, table, or figure. This completeness/identity failure blocks all scientific assessment.
  2. [Full Text, Abstract and §1 (arXiv:2508.15451)] Even read as the standalone molecular-switch paper that the supplied text physically is, the excerpt is unverifiable. Its abstract asserts that the one-state, linear-in-state, nonlinear-in-input ODE model is exactly solvable and possesses convergence and fading-memory properties (Full Text, Abstract, sentences 1–2), but the body contains no equations, no theorem statements, no proofs, and no statement of the hypotheses on the input class or the nonlinearity. §1 ends mid-sentence ('...and the references therein'), so the promised derivations are entirely absent. The three mathematical claims are assertions, not demonstrated results, and the claimed transfer to neuromorphic hardware cannot be checked.
  3. [Full Text (overall)] For the declared PyTOD contribution, no empirical or reproducibility evidence is supplied: there are no tables, figures, baselines, ablations, code, or data references. The sentence 'Our experiments show that PyTOD surpasses strong baselines' (Abstract, sentence 5) cannot be tested. The relationship between reference [11] (the experimental molecular-switch device discussed in the attached excerpt, §1, paragraph 2) and the PyTOD system is never explained, so even the 'execution feedback' named in the title has no definition in the submitted text.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Full Text, footer] The arXiv identifier and category on the supplied body (arXiv:2508.15451v1 [cs.LG]) disagree with the header (arXiv:2508.15456, cs.CL); this is the visible symptom of the document mismatch and should be corrected on resubmission.
  2. [Full Text, §1] The excerpt has no reference list, so citations [1]–[11] cannot be resolved; the text also stops abruptly at the bottom of page 1, presumably due to truncation. A complete manuscript is needed before review can proceed.
  3. [Title page / footnotes] The author/affiliation footnotes (Nurdin and Nijhuis, UNSW/Twente) belong to the attached excerpt and are irreconcilable with PyTOD's declared authorship; as with the main text, the title page of the actual submission is required.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation in the supplied text; the full text is a different paper (arXiv:2508.15451) than the declared PyTOD submission (arXiv:2508.15456), so the PyTOD claims cannot be audited.

full rationale

The supplied full text is the first page of 'A Solvable Molecular Switch Model for Stable Temporal Information Processing' by Nurdin and Nijhuis (arXiv:2508.15451), not the declared PyTOD paper (arXiv:2508.15456). Within that supplied text, the derivation chain is a mathematical one: a one-state, linear-in-state, nonlinear-in-input differential equation is shown to be exactly solvable and to possess convergence and fading-memory properties. These are consequences of the model equations, not fitted values, renamed empirical patterns, or restatements of the conclusion. Reference [11] anchors the model to an experimental molecular switch, but it is used as external motivation, not as the source of the mathematical properties; no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, no ansatz is smuggled via citation, and no parameter is fitted to the target claim. The document identity mismatch is a serious completeness/verification defect—PyTOD's state-tracking performance claims are entirely unsupported by this excerpt—but it is not circularity under the defined criteria. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The supplied excerpt provides no equations, so no fitted, hand-chosen, or ad hoc parameters can be enumerated. The central claim rests on the adequacy of the one-state model for the physical switch, on standard dynamical systems background used in exact-solvability and fading-memory arguments, and on unstated input and nonlinearity conditions. No new physical entities are introduced; the molecular switch is an existing experimental device cited as [11].

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The experimentally demonstrated dynamic molecular switch [11] is adequately represented by a one-state, linear-in-state, nonlinear-in-input differential equation model.
    Section 1 says the model was 'initially developed for an experimentally demonstrated dynamic molecular switch.' If the device needs more state variables or different dynamics, the proved properties do not transfer to hardware.
  • standard math Standard existence, uniqueness, and asymptotic theory for driven ordinary differential equations applies, and convergence and fading memory are defined in the classical sense (fading-memory norm).
    The abstract's convergence and fading memory claims rely on the standard functional-analytic framework for input-driven systems, invoked but not stated in the excerpt.
  • domain assumption The time-varying inputs and the model nonlinearity satisfy the boundedness and regularity conditions required for the exact solution to be finite and the fading-memory property to hold.
    Fading memory results normally require bounded inputs and contractive state dynamics; the excerpt states neither the hypotheses nor the proofs, yet the central claim presupposes them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of PyTOD: Programmable Task-Oriented Dialogue with Execution Feedback." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y5XG2VYW

@misc{pith2026250815456,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: PyTOD: Programmable Task-Oriented Dialogue with Execution Feedback},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y5XG2VYW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15456}
}
read the original abstract

Programmable task-oriented dialogue (TOD) agents enable language models to follow structured dialogue policies, but their effectiveness hinges on accurate state tracking. We present PyTOD, an agent that generates executable code to track dialogue state and uses policy and execution feedback for efficient error correction. To this end, PyTOD employs a simple constrained decoding approach, using a language model instead of grammar rules to follow API schemata. This leads to state-of-the-art state tracking performance on the challenging SGD benchmark. Our experiments show that PyTOD surpasses strong baselines in both accuracy and robust user goal estimation as the dialogue progresses, demonstrating the effectiveness of execution-aware state tracking.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [11]

    Yujie Feng, Zexin Lu, Bo Liu, Liming Zhan, and Xiao - Ming Wu. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2023.EMNLP-MAIN.48 Towards llm-driven dialogue state tracking . In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2023, Singapore, December 6-10, 2023 , pages 739--755. Association for Computational Linguistics

  2. [1]

    URL: " 'urlintro :=

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year eprint doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block STRINGS urlintro eprinturl eprintpr...

  3. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  4. [3]

    Ibrahim Taha Aksu, Min-Yen Kan, and Nancy Chen. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-long.252 Prompter: Zero-shot adaptive prefixes for dialogue state tracking domain adaptation . In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4588--4603, Toronto, Canada. Association for Comp...

  5. [4]

    Hyundong Cho, Andrea Madotto, Zhaojiang Lin, Khyathi Chandu, Satwik Kottur, Jing Xu, Jonathan May, and Chinnadhurai Sankar. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.235 Continual dialogue state tracking via example-guided question answering . In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3873--38...

  6. [5]

    Hyundong Cho, Chinnadhurai Sankar, Christopher Lin, Kaushik Sadagopan, Shahin Shayandeh, Asli Celikyilmaz, Jonathan May, and Ahmad Beirami. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.391 Know thy strengths: Comprehensive dialogue state tracking diagnostics . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, pages 5345--5...

  7. [6]

    Zhao, Yanping Huang, Andrew M

    Hyung Won Chung, Le Hou, Shayne Longpre, Barret Zoph, Yi Tay, William Fedus, Yunxuan Li, Xuezhi Wang, Mostafa Dehghani, Siddhartha Brahma, Albert Webson, Shixiang Shane Gu, Zhuyun Dai, Mirac Suzgun, Xinyun Chen, Aakanksha Chowdhery, Alex Castro - Ros, Marie Pellat, Kevin Robinson, Dasha Valter, Sharan Narang, Gaurav Mishra, Adams Yu, Vincent Y. Zhao, Yanp...

  8. [7]

    Alexandru Coca, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Jinghong Chen, Weizhe Lin, Weixuan Zhang, Tisha Anders, and Bill Byrne. 2023 a . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.sigdial-1.42 Grounding description-driven dialogue state trackers with knowledge-seeking turns . In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 444--456...

Show all 47 references
  1. [8]

    Alexandru Coca, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Weizhe Lin, and Bill Byrne. 2023 b . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-eacl.106 More robust schema-guided dialogue state tracking via tree-based paraphrase ranking . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EACL 202...

  2. [9]

    Xiaoyu Dong, Yujie Feng, Zexin Lu, Guangyuan Shi, and Xiao-Ming Wu. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.485 Zero-shot cross-domain dialogue state tracking via context-aware auto-prompting and instruction-following contrastive decoding . In Proceedings of the 2024...

  3. [10]

    Michelle Elizabeth, Morgan Veyret, Miguel Couceiro, Ondrej Dusek, and Lina Maria Rojas - Barahona. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2412.01262 Do large language models with reasoning and acting meet the needs of task-oriented dialogue? CoRR, abs/2412.01262

  4. [12]

    Finch and Jinho D

    James D. Finch and Jinho D. Choi. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.731 Diverse and effective synthetic data generation for adaptable zero-shot dialogue state tracking . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, pages 12527--...

  5. [13]

    Haoyu Gao, Ting - En Lin, Hangyu Li, Min Yang, Yuchuan Wu, Wentao Ma, Fei Huang, and Yongbin Li. 2024. https://aclanthology.org/2024.lrec-main.1269 Self-explanation prompting improves dialogue understanding in large language models . In Proceedings of the 2024 Joint Internatio...

  6. [14]

    Raghav Gupta, Harrison Lee, Jeffrey Zhao, Yuan Cao, Abhinav Rastogi, and Yonghui Wu. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2022.NAACL-MAIN.336 Show, don't tell: Demonstrations outperform descriptions for schema-guided task-oriented dialogue . In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference ...

  7. [15]

    Michael Heck, Nurul Lubis, Benjamin Ruppik, Renato Vukovic, Shutong Feng, Christian Geishauser, Hsien-chin Lin, Carel van Niekerk, and Milica Gasic. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.81 C hat GPT for zero-shot dialogue state tracking: A solution or an opportunit...

  8. [16]

    Smith, and Mari Ostendorf

    Yushi Hu, Chia - Hsuan Lee, Tianbao Xie, Tao Yu, Noah A. Smith, and Mari Ostendorf. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2022.FINDINGS-EMNLP.193 In-context learning for few-shot dialogue state tracking . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, Ab...

  9. [17]

    Vojt e ch Hude c ek and Ondrej Dusek. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.sigdial-1.21 Are large language models all you need for task-oriented dialogue? In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 216--228, Pragu...

  10. [18]

    L \'e o Jacqmin. 2022. https://aclanthology.org/2022.jeptalnrecital-recital.1 « est-ce que tu me suis ? » : une revue du suivi de l ' \'e tat du dialogue ( `` do you follow me ?'' : a review of dialogue state tracking ) . In Actes de la 29e Conf \'e rence sur le Traitement Aut...

  11. [19]

    Brendan King and Jeffrey Flanigan. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.344 Diverse retrieval-augmented in-context learning for dialogue state tracking . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 5570--5585, Toronto, Canada. A...

  12. [20]

    Atharva Kulkarni, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, Joel Ruben Antony Moniz, Dhivya Piraviperumal, Hong Yu, and Shruti Bhargava. 2024. https://aclanthology.org/2024.eacl-long.120/ S ynth DST : Synthetic data is all you need for few-shot dialog state tracking . In Proceedings of the 18th Confer...

  13. [21]

    Chia - Hsuan Lee, Hao Cheng, and Mari Ostendorf. 2024 a . https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2410.18209 Correctionlm: Self-corrections with SLM for dialogue state tracking . CoRR, abs/2410.18209

  14. [22]

    Chia-Hsuan Lee, Hao Cheng, and Mari Ostendorf. 2024 b . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.79 O rchestra LLM : Efficient orchestration of language models for dialogue state tracking . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Associati...

  15. [23]

    Harrison Lee, Raghav Gupta, Abhinav Rastogi, Yuan Cao, Bin Zhang, and Yonghui Wu. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1609/AAAI.V36I10.21341 SGD-X: A benchmark for robust generalization in schema-guided dialogue systems . In Thirty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2...

  16. [24]

    Seanie Lee, Jianpeng Cheng, Joris Driesen, Alexandru Coca, and Anders Johannsen. 2024 c . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.6 Effective and efficient conversation retrieval for dialogue state tracking with implicit text summaries . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conferen...

  17. [25]

    Zekun Li, Zhiyu Chen, Mike Ross, Patrick Huber, Seungwhan Moon, Zhaojiang Lin, Xin Dong, Adithya Sagar, Xifeng Yan, and Paul A. Crook. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2024.ACL-LONG.471 Large language models as zero-shot dialogue state tracker through function calling . In Pr...

  18. [26]

    Zekun Li, Baolin Peng, Pengcheng He, Michel Galley, Jianfeng Gao, and Xifeng Yan. 2023. http://papers.nips.cc/paper\_files/paper/2023/hash/c5601d99ed028448f29d1dae2e4a926d-Abstract-Conference.html Guiding large language models via directional stimulus prompting . In Advances i...

  19. [27]

    Zhaojiang Lin, Bing Liu, Andrea Madotto, Seungwhan Moon, Zhenpeng Zhou, Paul Crook, Zhiguang Wang, Zhou Yu, Eunjoon Cho, Rajen Subba, and Pascale Fung. 2021 a . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.622 Zero-shot dialogue state tracking via cross-task transfer . In Proce...

  20. [28]

    Zhaojiang Lin, Bing Liu, Seungwhan Moon, Paul Crook, Zhenpeng Zhou, Zhiguang Wang, Zhou Yu, Andrea Madotto, Eunjoon Cho, and Rajen Subba. 2021 b . https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.448 Leveraging slot descriptions for zero-shot cross-domain dialogue S tate T racking ...

  21. [29]

    Jiarui Lu, Thomas Holleis, Yizhe Zhang, Bernhard Aumayer, Feng Nan, Felix Bai, Shuang Ma, Shen Ma, Mengyu Li, Guoli Yin, Zirui Wang, and Ruoming Pang. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2408.04682 Toolsandbox: A stateful, conversational, interactive evaluation benchmark for ...

  22. [30]

    Johannes E. M. Mosig, Shikib Mehri, and Thomas Kober. 2020. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11853 STAR: A schema-guided dialog dataset for transfer learning . CoRR, abs/2010.11853

  23. [31]

    OpenAI. 2022. Introducing ChatGPT . https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt

  24. [32]

    Alec Radford, Jeff Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners

  25. [33]

    Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2020. http://jmlr.org/papers/v21/20-074.html Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer . J. Mach. Learn. Res., ...

  26. [34]

    Abhinav Rastogi, Xiaoxue Zang, Srinivas Sunkara, Raghav Gupta, and Pranav Khaitan. 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.05855 Towards scalable multi-domain conversational agents: The schema-guided dialogue dataset . CoRR, abs/1909.05855

  27. [35]

    Abhinav Rastogi, Xiaoxue Zang, Srinivas Sunkara, Raghav Gupta, and Pranav Khaitan. 2020. http://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01359 Schema-guided dialogue state tracking task at DSTC8 . CoRR, abs/2002.01359

  28. [36]

    Vishal Vivek Saley, Rocktim Jyoti Das, Dinesh Raghu, and Mausam . 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.320 Synergizing in-context learning with hints for end-to-end task-oriented dialog systems . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natura...

  29. [37]

    Raphael Shu, Elman Mansimov, Tamer Alkhouli, Nikolaos Pappas, Salvatore Romeo, Arshit Gupta, Saab Mansour, Yi Zhang, and Dan Roth. 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09946 Dialog2api: Task-oriented dialogue with API description and example programs . CoRR, abs/2212.09946

  30. [38]

    Joe Stacey, Jianpeng Cheng, John Torr, Tristan Guigue, Joris Driesen, Alexandru Coca, Mark Gaynor, and Anders Johannsen. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-srw.8 LUCID : LLM -generated utterances for complex and interesting dialogues . In Proceedings of the 2024 Conf...

  31. [39]

    Armand Stricker and Patrick Paroubek. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.sigdial-1.50 A few-shot approach to task-oriented dialogue enhanced with chitchat . In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 590--602, K...

  32. [40]

    Ryuichi Takanobu, Qi Zhu, Jinchao Li, Baolin Peng, Jianfeng Gao, and Minlie Huang. 2020. https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2020.SIGDIAL-1.37 Is your goal-oriented dialog model performing really well? empirical analysis of system-wise evaluation . In Proceedings of the 21th Annual Me...

  33. [41]

    Xin Tian, Liankai Huang, Yingzhan Lin, Siqi Bao, Huang He, Yunyi Yang, Hua Wu, Fan Wang, and Shuqi Sun. 2021. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.nlp4convai-1.8 Amendable generation for dialogue state tracking . In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Natural Language Processing fo...

  34. [42]

    Thomas Wolf, Lysandre Debut, Victor Sanh, Julien Chaumond, Clement Delangue, Anthony Moi, Pierric Cistac, Tim Rault, R \' e mi Louf, Morgan Funtowicz, and Jamie Brew. 2019. http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.03771 Huggingface's transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing...

  35. [43]

    Yuxiang Wu, Guanting Dong, and Weiran Xu. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2023.FINDINGS-EMNLP.741 Semantic parsing by large language models for intricate updating strategies of zero-shot dialogue state tracking . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ...

  36. [44]

    Hongyan Xie, Haoxiang Su, Shuangyong Song, Hao Huang, Bo Zou, Kun Deng, Jianghua Lin, Zhihui Zhang, and Xiaodong He. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.56 Correctable- DST : Mitigating historical context mismatch between training and inference for improved dialo...

  37. [45]

    Xiaoying Zhang, Baolin Peng, Kun Li, Jingyan Zhou, and Helen Meng. 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.09067 SGP-TOD: building task bots effortlessly via schema-guided LLM prompting . CoRR, abs/2305.09067

  38. [46]

    Jeffrey Zhao, Yuan Cao, Raghav Gupta, Harrison Lee, Abhinav Rastogi, Mingqiu Wang, Hagen Soltau, Izhak Shafran, and Yonghui Wu. 2023. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.1006 A ny TOD : A programmable task-oriented dialog system . In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference ...

  39. [47]

    Jeffrey Zhao, Raghav Gupta, Yuan Cao, Dian Yu, Mingqiu Wang, Harrison Lee, Abhinav Rastogi, Izhak Shafran, and Yonghui Wu. 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08904 Description-driven task-oriented dialog modeling . CoRR, abs/2201.08904

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.