Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 217 references

A Dynamical Systems Framework for Reinforcement Learning Safety and Robustness Verification

T0 review · 5 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that treating an RL agent and its environment as a discrete-time autonomous dynamical system lets Finite-Time Lyapunov Exponent ridges serve as safety barriers, with repelling structures marking unsafe regions and attractin

desk verdict The abstract describes an RL safety framework, but the full text is a different hep-th paper, so there is nothing here to referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15588 v1 pith:I3JFEKNH submitted 2025-08-21 cs.AI

Ahmed Nasir , Abdelhafid Zenati This is my paper
classification cs.AI
keywords reinforcementlearningsafetyFinite-TimeLyapunovExponentLagrangianCoherentStructurespolicyverificationrobustnessmetricsdynamicalsystemsbarrierstrapstates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a learned policy's safety and robustness are not just reward statistics but geometric features of the closed-loop dynamics. By viewing the agent–environment loop as a discrete-time autonomous dynamical system, it uses finite-time Lyapunov exponents to extract Lagrangian Coherent Structures: repelling ridges act as separatrices that shield unsafe regions, while attracting ridges expose convergence behavior and hidden trap states. To make the picture quantitative, the paper introduces three metrics—Mean Boundary Repulsion, Aggregated Spurious Attractor Strength, and Temporally-Aware Spurious Attractor Strength—and argues these measure a policy's safety margin and robustness. If correct, this gives an interpretable, quantifiable safety audit for RL policies in settings where high reward hides critical failure modes.

What carries the argument

The central object is the finite-time Lyapunov exponent (FTLE) field, a per-state number measuring how quickly nearby starting conditions separate over a finite integration window. Ridges of this field are the Lagrangian Coherent Structures (LCS): repelling LCS act as separatrices that separate the state space into safe and unsafe basins, while attracting LCS outline invariant sets and failure traps. The quantitative metrics MBR, ASAS, and TASAS summarize the geometric picture: MBR quantifies how strongly unsafe basins push trajectories away, while ASAS and TASAS quantify the pull of spurious attractors, with TASAS adding dependence on when the attraction acts.

What would settle it

Run the method on a two-dimensional continuous control task with a known unsafe set and a policy trained to avoid it; compute the FTLE field over increasing integration times and perturb the sampling grid. If the resulting repelling ridges shift by more than the local grid scale as the integration window grows, or if the ridge lies outside the true boundary of the basin of attraction of the unsafe set, the claimed one-to-one correspondence between LCS and safety barriers fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the closed-loop system formed by a policy and its environment has an observable geometric skeleton, and that this skeleton carries the safety-relevant information. Repelling Lagrangian Coherent Structures, computed as ridges of the finite-time Lyapunov exponent field, mark the boundaries that separate safe from unsafe regions of state space; attracting LCS reveal the sets toward which the system converges, including spurious attractors that act as traps. The paper further claims that the strength and temporal persistence of these structures can be condensed into scalars—MBR for the repulsion of unsafe boundaries, ASAS and TASAS for aggregated and temporally-aware at

Load-bearing premise

The whole safety-barrier interpretation depends on the finite-time Lyapunov exponent ridges computed from a finite number of sampled trajectories being stable and coinciding with the true safety-relevant boundaries of the closed-loop system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Policies that look identical under reward can be distinguished by the geometry of their repelling and attracting LCS.
  • Repelling LCS give a principled place to enforce safety: staying inside the ridge-bounded safe region should keep the policy away from known failure modes.
  • Attracting LCS identify trap states and convergence failures that would otherwise only surface in long rollouts.
  • MBR, ASAS, and TASAS provide a numeric safety margin that can be tracked during training or used to compare candidate policies.
  • The local stability guarantees and model-uncertainty extension let the verification claim survive a mismatched dynamics model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step the paper does not take is to use the same geometric skeleton online: repelling ridges could seed barrier-function candidates or safety filters that actively prevent the policy from entering unsafe basins during execution.
  • If the true loop is non-autonomous or the policy is stochastic, the discrete-time autonomous assumption becomes a modeling choice; lifting the state to include the randomness source or time index would be needed to keep the FTLE interpretation valid.
  • The safety-margin metrics could be tested as predictors of empirical failure: policies with lower MBR or higher TASAS should fail more often under bounded perturbations, which is a direct quantitative check of the framework.
  • The attractor view also suggests a training-time use: penalizing the strength of spurious attractors (ASAS/TASAS) during reward shaping may remove failure traps that rewards alone do not discourage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 0 minor

Summary. The submission's abstract claims a new dynamical-systems framework for reinforcement-learning safety verification: the agent and environment are modeled as a discrete-time autonomous dynamical system; Finite-Time Lyapunov Exponents and Lagrangian Coherent Structures are used to identify safety barriers and failure modes; and three metrics (MBR, ASAS, TASAS) are introduced to quantify safety margins and robustness, together with local stability guarantees and control experiments. However, the supplied full text is a completely different paper, arXiv:2508.15589, 'Cosmological pole-skipping, shock waves and quantum chaotic dynamics of de Sitter horizons', by different authors and in a different field. None of the RL safety framework, definitions, theorems, algorithms, or experiments described in the abstract appears anywhere in the body. The manuscript is therefore internally inconsistent: the central claim has no supporting text.

Significance. If the abstract's claims were substantiated, the framework would offer an interpretable, quantitative complement to reward-based RL evaluation, potentially identifying unsafe policies that reward alone misses. That is a worthwhile goal. But as submitted, the paper cannot be assessed on that basis: the body contains no definition of the closed-loop dynamical system, no construction of FTLE/LCS fields for an RL loop, no formal definitions or properties of MBR/ASAS/TASAS, and no experimental results. The only technical content is a holographic pole-skipping analysis whose conclusions are explicitly conditional on a holographic dual existing, and that content is irrelevant to the abstract's RL claims. No machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or falsifiable RL predictions are present. The central claim is unverifiable, not merely contestable.

major comments (5)
  1. [Entire manuscript (title through references)] The full text is arXiv:2508.15589, 'Cosmological pole-skipping, shock waves and quantum chaotic dynamics of de Sitter horizons', by Ahn, Grozdanov, Jeong, and Pedraza. It has no section corresponding to the abstract's RL safety framework. The agent-environment map, the FTLE/LCS construction, the definitions of MBR/ASAS/TASAS, the local stability guarantee, and the control experiments are all absent. This is load-bearing: every central claim in the abstract lacks a supporting derivation or evaluation.
  2. [Abstract, first paragraph] The framework's premise is that the RL loop can be represented as a discrete-time autonomous dynamical system whose finite-time Lyapunov exponents yield stable LCS that correspond one-to-one with safety-relevant boundaries. This is asserted, not demonstrated. The body does not define the state space, the policy class, the environment class, or the conditions under which FTLE ridges are not finite-time integration artifacts. In particular, stochastic policies or nonstationary environments would violate the autonomous deterministic approximation, and no treatment is given.
  3. [Abstract, second paragraph (metrics)] MBR, ASAS, and TASAS are named as 'formal' quantitative measures of safety margin and robustness, but their definitions are never given. Without definitions, one cannot determine whether they measure what is claimed, whether they depend on simulation length or trajectory count, or whether they were tuned on known failure cases. The claim 'formally measure' is therefore unsupported.
  4. [Abstract, third paragraph (experiments)] The abstract reports experiments in discrete and continuous control environments and states that the framework 'successfully identifies critical flaws' in policies that appear successful by reward. No environments, baselines, hyperparameters, metrics values, figures, tables, or code are provided in the full text. The experimental claim is not reproducible or auditable.
  5. [Body, Section 5 (Conclusions)] The body's own caveat—that an explicit holographic dual for de Sitter space remains an open theoretical challenge—pertains to the physics paper and does not mitigate the absence of the RL content. The only limitation statement in the manuscript is about a different project; the abstract's framework has no stated limitations or validity conditions because it has no body.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be exhibited: the supplied full text is a different paper, so the claimed RL derivation chain is absent and no equation-level reduction to inputs exists to audit.

full rationale

The abstract claims a dynamical-systems RL safety framework (FTLE/LCS, MBR/ASAS/TASAS metrics, local stability guarantees, model uncertainty). However, the supplied full text is arXiv:2508.15589, a hep-th paper on pole-skipping in de Sitter horizons, with no definitions of the RL closed-loop system, FTLE/LCS computation, metrics, or experiments. Under the hard rule that circularity must be exhibited by quoting a specific reduction (Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction), no such reduction can be identified from the abstract alone: the metric definitions are absent, so one cannot show that MBR/ASAS/TASAS encode the safety conclusions by construction, nor that the LCS safety barriers are defined in terms of the unsafe regions they are said to reveal. The mismatch is an internal inconsistency / unverifiability, not circularity. The physics text contains toy models explicitly constructed to reproduce superluminal/imaginary butterfly velocities (Sec. 4.4: 'we now develop a microscopic toy model capable of reproducing the enhancement of the butterfly velocity...' and 'we now propose a toy model that can capture the purely imaginary butterfly velocity'), but those are explicitly labeled toy models for future exploration and are not used to derive the pole-skipping/shock-wave results; they do not enter the RL abstract's derivation. Because no derivation chain from the abstract is present in the body, I set score 0, the honest non-finding, rather than guessing at hidden circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Because the full text does not correspond to the abstract, this ledger records the presuppositions of the abstract's framework rather than auditable derivations. The load-bearing assumptions are the dynamical-systems modeling of the RL loop and the interpretive link between LCS and safety barriers. No invented physical entities are claimed in the abstract.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The combination of an RL agent and its environment forms a discrete-time autonomous dynamical system
    Stated as the foundation of the framework in the abstract; a stochastic policy or non-stationary environment would break autonomy. No justification is present in the available text.
  • domain assumption FTLE ridges computed from finite trajectories correspond to Lagrangian Coherent Structures that act as safety barriers around unsafe regions
    This is the interpretive bridge from dynamical-systems observables to safety semantics claimed in the abstract; it requires finite-time estimates to converge to stable geometric structures, which the missing body would need to demonstrate.
  • domain assumption Attracting LCS reveal convergence properties and unintended trap states
    Interpretive claim in the abstract carrying the same verification burden as the repelling-LCS claim; no evidence is supplied.
  • ad hoc to paper The author-defined metrics MBR, ASAS, and TASAS formally measure a policy's safety margin and robustness
    These metrics are introduced in the abstract without definitions; their validity as formal measures is an assumption of the claimed framework and is unverifiable in this manuscript.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Dynamical Systems Framework for Reinforcement Learning Safety and Robustness Verification." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I3JFEKNH

@misc{pith2026250815588,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Dynamical Systems Framework for Reinforcement Learning Safety and Robustness Verification},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I3JFEKNH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15588}
}
read the original abstract

The application of reinforcement learning to safety-critical systems is limited by the lack of formal methods for verifying the robustness and safety of learned policies. This paper introduces a novel framework that addresses this gap by analyzing the combination of an RL agent and its environment as a discrete-time autonomous dynamical system. By leveraging tools from dynamical systems theory, specifically the Finite-Time Lyapunov Exponent (FTLE), we identify and visualize Lagrangian Coherent Structures (LCS) that act as the hidden "skeleton" governing the system's behavior. We demonstrate that repelling LCS function as safety barriers around unsafe regions, while attracting LCS reveal the system's convergence properties and potential failure modes, such as unintended "trap" states. To move beyond qualitative visualization, we introduce a suite of quantitative metrics, Mean Boundary Repulsion (MBR), Aggregated Spurious Attractor Strength (ASAS), and Temporally-Aware Spurious Attractor Strength (TASAS), to formally measure a policy's safety margin and robustness. We further provide a method for deriving local stability guarantees and extend the analysis to handle model uncertainty. Through experiments in both discrete and continuous control environments, we show that this framework provides a comprehensive and interpretable assessment of policy behavior, successfully identifying critical flaws in policies that appear successful based on reward alone.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

217 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,gr-qc/9310026

    G. ’t Hooft,Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,gr-qc/9310026

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Susskind,The World as a hologram,J.Math.Phys.��(1995) 6377–6396, [hep-th/9409089]

    L. Susskind,The World as a hologram,J.Math.Phys.��(1995) 6377–6396, [hep-th/9409089]

    arXiv 1995

  3. [3]

    J. D. Bekenstein,Black holes and the second law,Lett. Nuovo Cim.�(1972) 737–740

    1972

  4. [4]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.��(1975) 199–220

    1975

  5. [5]

    J. M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Adv.Theor.Math.Phys.�(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1998

  6. [6]

    Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP��(2001) 034, [hep-th/0106113]

    A. Strominger,The dS / CFT correspondence,JHEP��(2001) 034, [hep-th/0106113]

    arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Weinberg,Cosmology, vol

    S. Weinberg,Cosmology, vol. 41. Oxford University Press, June, 2009. [8]Supernova Search Teamcollaboration, A. G. Riess et al.,Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,Astron. J.���(1998) 1009–1038, [astro-ph/9805201]. [9]Supernova Cosmology Projectcollaboration, S. Perlmutter et al.,Measurements ofΩ ...

    arXiv 2009

  8. [10]

    Spradlin, A

    M. Spradlin, A. Strominger and A. Volovich,Les Houches lectures on de Sitter space, inLes Houches Summer School: Session 76: Euro Summer School on Unity of Fundamental Physics: Gravity, Gauge Theory and Strings, pp. 423–453, 10, 2001.hep-th/0110007

    arXiv 2001

Show all 217 references
  1. [11]

    Anninos,De Sitter Musings,Int

    D. Anninos,De Sitter Musings,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A��(2012) 1230013, [1205.3855]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [12]

    D. A. Galante,Modave lectures on de Sitter space & holography,PoS����������(2023) 003, [2306.10141]

    2023 arXiv

  3. [13]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking,Cosmological Event Horizons, Thermodynamics, and Particle Creation,Phys. Rev. D��(1977) 2738–2751

    1977

  4. [14]

    Chandrasekaran, R

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,JHEP��(2023) 082, [2206.10780]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [15]

    Witten,Algebras, regions, and observers.,Proc

    E. Witten,Algebras, regions, and observers.,Proc. Symp. Pure Math.���(2024) 247–276, [2303.02837]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [16]

    Bousso,Adventures in de Sitter space, inWorkshop on Conference on the Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology in Honor of Steven Hawking’s 60th Birthday, pp

    R. Bousso,Adventures in de Sitter space, inWorkshop on Conference on the Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology in Honor of Steven Hawking’s 60th Birthday, pp. 539–569, 5, 2002.hep-th/0205177

    2002 arXiv

  7. [17]

    Susskind,Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example, JHAP�(2021) 1–22, [2109.14104]

    L. Susskind,Entanglement and Chaos in De Sitter Space Holography: An SYK Example, JHAP�(2021) 1–22, [2109.14104]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [18]

    Shaghoulian,The central dogma and cosmological horizons,JHEP��(2022) 132, [2110.13210]

    E. Shaghoulian,The central dogma and cosmological horizons,JHEP��(2022) 132, [2110.13210]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [19]

    Shaghoulian and L

    E. Shaghoulian and L. Susskind,Entanglement in De Sitter space,JHEP��(2022) 198, [2201.03603]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [20]

    Bousso,The Holographic principle for general backgrounds,Class

    R. Bousso,The Holographic principle for general backgrounds,Class. Quant. Grav.�� (2000) 997–1005, [hep-th/9911002]. – 46 –

    2000 arXiv

  11. [21]

    Banks and W

    T. Banks and W. Fischler,M theory observables for cosmological space-times, hep-th/0102077

    arXiv

  12. [22]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler and S. Paban,Recurrent nightmares? Measurement theory in de Sitter space,JHEP��(2002) 062, [hep-th/0210160]

    2002 arXiv

  13. [23]

    Dyson, J

    L. Dyson, J. Lindesay and L. Susskind,Is there really a de Sitter/CFT duality?,JHEP�� (2002) 045, [hep-th/0202163]

    2002 arXiv

  14. [24]

    Banks, B

    T. Banks, B. Fiol and A. Morisse,Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space,JHEP�� (2006) 004, [hep-th/0609062]

    2006 arXiv

  15. [25]

    Banks and W

    T. Banks and W. Fischler,The holographic spacetime model of cosmology,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D��(2018) 1846005, [1806.01749]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [26]

    Susskind,De Sitter Holography: Fluctuations, Anomalous Symmetry, and Wormholes, Universe�(2021) 464, [2106.03964]

    L. Susskind,De Sitter Holography: Fluctuations, Anomalous Symmetry, and Wormholes, Universe�(2021) 464, [2106.03964]

    2021 arXiv

  17. [27]

    X. Dong, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba,De Sitter Holography and Entanglement Entropy, JHEP��(2018) 050, [1804.08623]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [28]

    Lin and L

    H. Lin and L. Susskind,Infinite Temperature’s Not So Hot,2206.01083

    arXiv

  19. [29]

    Baiguera, R

    S. Baiguera, R. Berman, S. Chapman and R. C. Myers,The cosmological switchback effect, JHEP��(2023) 162, [2304.15008]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [30]

    Lewkowycz, J

    A. Lewkowycz, J. Liu, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba,� �and EE, with implications for (A)dS subregion encodings,JHEP��(2020) 152, [1909.13808]

    2020

  21. [31]

    Coleman, E

    E. Coleman, E. A. Mazenc, V. Shyam, E. Silverstein, R. M. Soni, G. Torroba et al.,De Sitter microstates from T �+Λ � and the Hawking-Page transition,JHEP��(2022) 140, [2110.14670]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [32]

    Anninos, F

    D. Anninos, F. Denef, Y. T. A. Law and Z. Sun,Quantum de Sitter horizon entropy from quasicanonical bulk, edge, sphere and topological string partition functions,JHEP��(2022) 088, [2009.12464]

    2022 arXiv

  23. [33]

    Silverstein,Black hole to cosmic horizon microstates in string/M theory: timelike boundaries and internal averaging,JHEP��(2023) 160, [2212.00588]

    E. Silverstein,Black hole to cosmic horizon microstates in string/M theory: timelike boundaries and internal averaging,JHEP��(2023) 160, [2212.00588]

    2023 arXiv

  24. [34]

    Freivogel, V

    B. Freivogel, V. E. Hubeny, A. Maloney, R. C. Myers, M. Rangamani and S. Shenker, Inflation in AdS/CFT,JHEP��(2006) 007, [hep-th/0510046]

    2006 arXiv

  25. [35]

    D. A. Lowe and S. Roy,Punctuated eternal inflation via AdS/CFT,Phys. Rev. D��(2010) 063508, [1004.1402]

    2010 arXiv

  26. [36]

    Fischetti, D

    S. Fischetti, D. Marolf and A. C. Wall,A paucity of bulk entangling surfaces: AdS wormholes with de Sitter interiors,Class. Quant. Grav.��(2015) 065011, [1409.6754]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [37]

    Anninos and D

    D. Anninos and D. M. Hofman,Infrared Realization of dS � in AdS�,Class. Quant. Grav.�� (2018) 085003, [1703.04622]

    2018 arXiv

  28. [38]

    Anninos, D

    D. Anninos, D. A. Galante and D. M. Hofman,De Sitter horizons & holographic liquids, JHEP��(2019) 038, [1811.08153]

    2019 arXiv

  29. [39]

    Mirbabayi,Uptunneling to de Sitter,JHEP��(2020) 070, [2003.05460]

    M. Mirbabayi,Uptunneling to de Sitter,JHEP��(2020) 070, [2003.05460]

    2020 arXiv

  30. [40]

    Anninos and D

    D. Anninos and D. A. Galante,Constructing AdS � flow geometries,JHEP��(2021) 045, [2011.01944]. – 47 –

    2021 arXiv

  31. [41]

    Grozdanov, K

    S. Grozdanov, K. Schalm and V. Scopelliti,Black hole scrambling from hydrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2018) 231601, [1710.00921]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [42]

    Blake, H

    M. Blake, H. Lee and H. Liu,A quantum hydrodynamical description for scrambling and many-body chaos,JHEP��(2018) 127, [1801.00010]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [43]

    Blake, R

    M. Blake, R. A. Davison, S. Grozdanov and H. Liu,Many-body chaos and energy dynamics in holography,JHEP��(2018) 035, [1809.01169]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [44]

    W. Z. Chua, T. Hartman and W. W. Weng,Replica manifolds, pole skipping, and the butterfly effect,2504.08139

    arXiv

  35. [45]

    Grozdanov, P

    S. Grozdanov, P. K. Kovtun, A. O. Starinets and P. Tadi´ c,The complex life of hydrodynamic modes,JHEP��(2019) 097, [1904.12862]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [46]

    Blake, R

    M. Blake, R. A. Davison and D. Vegh,Horizon constraints on holographic Green ’s functions,JHEP��(2020) 077, [1904.12883]

    2020 arXiv

  37. [47]

    Amado, C

    I. Amado, C. Hoyos-Badajoz, K. Landsteiner and S. Montero,Hydrodynamics and beyond in the strongly coupled N=4 plasma,JHEP��(2008) 133, [0805.2570]

    2008 arXiv

  38. [48]

    Blake and H

    M. Blake and H. Liu,On systems of maximal quantum chaos,JHEP��(2021) 229, [2102.11294]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [49]

    Jeong, K.-Y

    H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and Y.-W. Sun,Bound of diffusion constants from pole-skipping points: spontaneous symmetry breaking and magnetic field,JHEP��(2021) 105, [2104.13084]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [50]

    C. Choi, M. Mezei and G. S´ arosi,Pole skipping away from maximal chaos,2010.08558

    2010 arXiv

  41. [51]

    F. M. Haehl and M. Rozali,Effective Field Theory for Chaotic CFTs,JHEP��(2018) 118, [1808.02898]

    2018 arXiv

  42. [52]

    Jensen,Scrambling in nearly thermalized states at large central charge,1906.05852

    K. Jensen,Scrambling in nearly thermalized states at large central charge,1906.05852

    1906 arXiv

  43. [53]

    S. Das, B. Ezhuthachan and A. Kundu,Real time dynamics from low point correlators in 2d BCFT,JHEP��(2019) 141, [1907.08763]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [54]

    F. M. Haehl, W. Reeves and M. Rozali,Reparametrization modes, shadow operators, and quantum chaos in higher-dimensional CFTs,JHEP��(2019) 102, [1909.05847]

    2019 arXiv

  45. [55]

    D. M. Ramirez,Chaos and pole skipping in CFT �,JHEP��(2021) 006, [2009.00500]

    2021 arXiv

  46. [56]

    Natsuume and T

    M. Natsuume and T. Okamura,Nonuniqueness of scattering amplitudes at special points, Phys. Rev. D���(2021) 126007, [2108.07832]

    2021 arXiv

  47. [57]

    Natsuume and T

    M. Natsuume and T. Okamura,Nonuniqueness of Green ’s functions at special points,JHEP ��(2019) 139, [1905.12015]

    2019 arXiv

  48. [58]

    Natsuume and T

    M. Natsuume and T. Okamura,Holographic chaos, pole-skipping, and regularity,PTEP ����(2020) 013B07, [1905.12014]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [59]

    Natsuume and T

    M. Natsuume and T. Okamura,Pole-skipping with finite-coupling corrections,Phys. Rev. D ���(2019) 126012, [1909.09168]

    2019 arXiv

  50. [60]

    Ceplak, K

    N. Ceplak, K. Ramdial and D. Vegh,Fermionic pole-skipping in holography,JHEP�� (2020) 203, [1910.02975]

    2020 arXiv

  51. [61]

    Y. Ahn, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong and K.-Y. Kim,Scrambling in Hyperbolic Black Holes: shock waves and pole-skipping,JHEP��(2019) 257, [1907.08030]. – 48 –

    2019 arXiv

  52. [62]

    Y. Ahn, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, K.-S. Lee and M. Nishida,Pole-skipping of scalar and vector fields in hyperbolic space: conformal blocks and holography,JHEP�� (2020) 111, [2006.00974]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [63]

    Abbasi and S

    N. Abbasi and S. Tahery,Complexified quasinormal modes and the pole-skipping in a holographic system at finite chemical potential,JHEP��(2020) 076, [2007.10024]

    2020 arXiv

  54. [64]

    Liu and A

    Y. Liu and A. Raju,Quantum Chaos in Topologically Massive Gravity,JHEP��(2020) 027, [2005.08508]

    2020 arXiv

  55. [65]

    Y. Ahn, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim, K.-S. Lee and M. Nishida,Classifying pole-skipping points,JHEP��(2021) 175, [2010.16166]

    2021 arXiv

  56. [66]

    Natsuume and T

    M. Natsuume and T. Okamura,Pole-skipping and zero temperature,Phys. Rev. D��� (2021) 066017, [2011.10093]

    2021 arXiv

  57. [67]

    Sil,Pole skipping and chaos in anisotropic plasma: a holographic study,JHEP��(2021) 232, [2012.07710]

    K. Sil,Pole skipping and chaos in anisotropic plasma: a holographic study,JHEP��(2021) 232, [2012.07710]

    2021 arXiv

  58. [68]

    Ceplak and D

    N. Ceplak and D. Vegh,Pole-skipping and Rarita-Schwinger fields,Phys. Rev. D��� (2021) 106009, [2101.01490]

    2021 arXiv

  59. [69]

    Blake and R

    M. Blake and R. A. Davison,Chaos and pole-skipping in rotating black holes,JHEP�� (2022) 013, [2111.11093]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [70]

    D. S. Ageev,Butterfly velocity and chaos suppression in de Sitter space,Theor. Math. Phys. ���(2025) 863–871, [2105.02258]

    2025 arXiv

  61. [71]

    Wang and W.-B

    Y.-T. Wang and W.-B. Pan,Pole-skipping of holographic correlators: aspects of gauge symmetry and generalizations,JHEP��(2023) 174, [2209.04296]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [72]

    Wang and Z.-Y

    D. Wang and Z.-Y. Wang,Pole Skipping in Holographic Theories with Bosonic Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2022) 231603, [2208.01047]

    2022 arXiv

  63. [73]

    M. A. G. Amano, M. Blake, C. Cartwright, M. Kaminski and A. P. Thompson,Chaos and pole-skipping in a simply spinning plasma,JHEP��(2023) 253, [2211.00016]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [74]

    Grozdanov and M

    S. Grozdanov and M. Vrbica,Pole-skipping of gravitational waves in the backgrounds of four-dimensional massive black holes,Eur. Phys. J. C��(2023) 1103, [2303.15921]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [75]

    Jeong, C.-W

    H.-S. Jeong, C.-W. Ji and K.-Y. Kim,Pole-skipping in rotating BTZ black holes,JHEP�� (2023) 139, [2306.14805]

    2023 arXiv

  66. [76]

    Grozdanov, T

    S. Grozdanov, T. Lemut and J. F. Pedraza,Reconstruction of the quasinormal spectrum from pole skipping,Phys. Rev. D���(2023) L101901, [2308.01371]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [77]

    Jeong,Thermal diffusivity and pole-skipping in the incoherent semilocally critical IR, Phys

    H.-S. Jeong,Thermal diffusivity and pole-skipping in the incoherent semilocally critical IR, Phys. Lett. B���(2025) 139591, [2309.13412]

    2025 arXiv

  68. [78]

    Abbasi and K

    N. Abbasi and K. Landsteiner,Pole-skipping as order parameter to probe a quantum critical point,JHEP��(2023) 169, [2307.16716]

    2023 arXiv

  69. [79]

    Pan, Y.-W

    W.-B. Pan, Y.-W. Sun and Y.-T. Wang,Pole-skipping for massive fields and the Stueckelberg formalism,JHEP��(2024) 256, [2404.17354]

    2024

  70. [80]

    Y. Ahn, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong, C.-W. Ji, K.-Y. Kim and M. Nishida,On pole-skipping with gauge-invariant variables in holographic axion theories,JHEP��(2024) 020, [2402.12951]

    2024 arXiv

  71. [81]

    Grozdanov and M

    S. Grozdanov and M. Vrbica,Duality Constraints on Thermal Spectra of 3D Conformal – 49 – Field Theories and 4D Quasinormal Modes,Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2024) 211601, [2406.19790]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [82]

    Grozdanov and M

    S. Grozdanov and M. Vrbica,Duality and four-dimensional black holes: gravitational waves, algebraically special solutions, pole skipping, and the spectral duality relation in holographic thermal CFTs,2505.14229

  73. [83]

    Z. Lu, C. Ran and S.-f. Wu,Bulk Spacetime Encoding via Boundary Ambiguities, 2506.12890

  74. [84]

    Z. Lu, C. Ran and S.-f. Wu,The Algebraic Structure Underlying Pole-Skipping Points, 2507.13306

  75. [85]

    Lilani, D

    N. Lilani, D. Sandhu and S. Mahapatra,Comparative study of the butterfly velocity in holographic QCD models at finite temperature and chemical potential,Phys. Rev. D��� (2025) 046012, [2505.15357]

    2025 arXiv

  76. [86]

    Kottler, ¨Uber die physikalischen Grundlagen der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie, Annalen Phys.���(1918) 401–462

    F. Kottler, ¨Uber die physikalischen Grundlagen der Einsteinschen Gravitationstheorie, Annalen Phys.���(1918) 401–462

    1918

  77. [87]

    Deser and R

    S. Deser and R. Jackiw,Three-Dimensional Cosmological Gravity: Dynamics of Constant Curvature,Annals Phys.���(1984) 405–416

    1984

  78. [88]

    A. M. Ghezelbash and R. B. Mann,Action, mass and entropy of Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes and the de Sitter / CFT correspondence,JHEP��(2002) 005, [hep-th/0111217]

    2002 arXiv

  79. [89]

    Maldacena, G

    J. Maldacena, G. J. Turiaci and Z. Yang,Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity,JHEP ��(2021) 139, [1904.01911]

    2021 arXiv

  80. [90]

    E. K. Morvan, J. P. van der Schaar and M. R. Visser,On the Euclidean action of de Sitter black holes and constrained instantons,SciPost Phys.��(2023) 022, [2203.06155]

    2023 arXiv

  81. [91]

    Nakarachinda,Effective thermodynamical system of schwarzschild–de sitter black holes from r´ enyi statistics,Physical Review D���(2021)

    R. Nakarachinda,Effective thermodynamical system of schwarzschild–de sitter black holes from r´ enyi statistics,Physical Review D���(2021)

    2021

  82. [92]

    Bousso and S

    R. Bousso and S. W. Hawking,(Anti)evaporation of Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes, Phys. Rev. D��(1998) 2436–2442, [hep-th/9709224]

    1998 arXiv

  83. [93]

    Shankaranarayanan,Temperature and entropy of Schwarzschild-de Sitter space-time, Phys

    S. Shankaranarayanan,Temperature and entropy of Schwarzschild-de Sitter space-time, Phys. Rev. D��(2003) 084026, [gr-qc/0301090]

    2003 arXiv

  84. [94]

    T. R. Choudhury and T. Padmanabhan,Concept of temperature in multi-horizon spacetimes: Analysis of Schwarzschild-de Sitter metric,Gen. Rel. Grav.��(2007) 1789–1811, [gr-qc/0404091]

    2007 arXiv

  85. [95]

    Visser,Area products for stationary black hole horizons,Phys

    M. Visser,Area products for stationary black hole horizons,Phys. Rev. D��(2013) 044014, [1205.6814]

    2013 arXiv

  86. [96]

    Natsuume and T

    M. Natsuume and T. Okamura,Pole skipping in a non-black-hole geometry,Phys. Rev. D ���(2023) 046012, [2306.03930]

    2023 arXiv

  87. [97]

    Kodama, A

    H. Kodama, A. Ishibashi and O. Seto,Brane world cosmology: Gauge invariant formalism for perturbation,Phys. Rev. D��(2000) 064022, [hep-th/0004160]

    2000 arXiv

  88. [98]

    Ueda and A

    K. Ueda and A. Ishibashi,Massive vector field perturbations on extremal and near-extremal static black holes,Phys. Rev. D��(2018) 124050, [1805.02479]

    2018 arXiv

  89. [99]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov,Quasiclassical method in the theory of superconductivity,Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics(1969) . – 50 –

    1969

  90. [100]

    Kukuljan, S

    I. Kukuljan, S. Grozdanov and T. Prosen,Weak Quantum Chaos,Phys. Rev. B��(2017) 060301, [1701.09147]

    2017 arXiv

  91. [101]

    Maldacena, S

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A bound on chaos,JHEP��(2016) 106, [1503.01409]

    2016 arXiv

  92. [102]

    Sekino and L

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind,Fast Scramblers,JHEP��(2008) 065, [0808.2096]

    2008 arXiv

  93. [103]

    D. A. Roberts and D. Stanford,Two-dimensional conformal field theory and the butterfly effect,Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2015) 131603, [1412.5123]

    2015 arXiv

  94. [104]

    Perlmutter,Bounding the Space of Holographic CFTs with Chaos,JHEP��(2016) 069, [1602.08272]

    E. Perlmutter,Bounding the Space of Holographic CFTs with Chaos,JHEP��(2016) 069, [1602.08272]

    2016 arXiv

  95. [105]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford,Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D�� (2016) 106002, [1604.07818]

    2016 arXiv

  96. [106]

    S´ arosi,AdS� holography and the SYK model,PoS����������(2018) 001, [1711.08482]

    G. S´ arosi,AdS� holography and the SYK model,PoS����������(2018) 001, [1711.08482]

    2018 arXiv

  97. [107]

    de Boer, E

    J. de Boer, E. Llabr´ es, J. F. Pedraza and D. Vegh,Chaotic strings in AdS/CFT,Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2018) 201604, [1709.01052]

    2018 arXiv

  98. [108]

    Murata,Fast scrambling in holographic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair,JHEP��(2017) 049, [1708.09493]

    K. Murata,Fast scrambling in holographic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair,JHEP��(2017) 049, [1708.09493]

    2017 arXiv

  99. [109]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. Kundu and R. R. Poojary,Strings, branes, Schwarzian action and maximal chaos,Phys. Lett. B���(2023) 137632, [1809.02090]

    2023 arXiv

  100. [110]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. Kundu and R. Poojary,Maximal Chaos from Strings, Branes and Schwarzian Action,JHEP��(2019) 076, [1811.04977]

    2019 arXiv

  101. [111]

    D. A. Roberts and B. Swingle,Lieb-Robinson Bound and the Butterfly Effect in Quantum Field Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2016) 091602, [1603.09298]

    2016 arXiv

  102. [112]

    Mezei,On entanglement spreading from holography,JHEP��(2017) 064, [1612.00082]

    M. Mezei,On entanglement spreading from holography,JHEP��(2017) 064, [1612.00082]

    2017 arXiv

  103. [113]

    D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford and L. Susskind,Localized shocks,JHEP��(2015) 051, [1409.8180]

    2015 arXiv

  104. [114]

    Alishahiha, A

    M. Alishahiha, A. Davody, A. Naseh and S. F. Taghavi,On Butterfly effect in Higher Derivative Gravities,JHEP��(2016) 032, [1610.02890]

    2016 arXiv

  105. [115]

    Grozdanov,On the connection between hydrodynamics and quantum chaos in holographic theories with stringy corrections,JHEP��(2019) 048, [1811.09641]

    S. Grozdanov,On the connection between hydrodynamics and quantum chaos in holographic theories with stringy corrections,JHEP��(2019) 048, [1811.09641]

    2019 arXiv

  106. [116]

    X. Dong, D. Wang, W. W. Weng and C.-H. Wu,A tale of two butterflies: an exact equivalence in higher-derivative gravity,JHEP��(2022) 009, [2203.06189]

    2022 arXiv

  107. [117]

    Giataganas, U

    D. Giataganas, U. G¨ ursoy and J. F. Pedraza,Strongly-coupled anisotropic gauge theories and holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2018) 121601, [1708.05691]

    2018 arXiv

  108. [118]

    Jahnke,Delocalizing entanglement of anisotropic black branes,JHEP��(2018) 102, [1708.07243]

    V. Jahnke,Delocalizing entanglement of anisotropic black branes,JHEP��(2018) 102, [1708.07243]

    2018 arXiv

  109. [119]

    G¨ ursoy, M

    U. G¨ ursoy, M. J¨ arvinen, G. Nijs and J. F. Pedraza,On the interplay between magnetic field and anisotropy in holographic QCD,JHEP��(2021) 180, [2011.09474]

    2021 arXiv

  110. [120]

    Kats and P

    Y. Kats and P. Petrov,Effect of curvature squared corrections in AdS on the viscosity of the dual gauge theory,JHEP��(2009) 044, [0712.0743]. – 51 –

    2009 arXiv

  111. [121]

    Brigante, H

    M. Brigante, H. Liu, R. C. Myers, S. Shenker and S. Yaida,Viscosity Bound Violation in Higher Derivative Gravity,Phys. Rev. D��(2008) 126006, [0712.0805]

    2008 arXiv

  112. [122]

    Brigante, H

    M. Brigante, H. Liu, R. C. Myers, S. Shenker and S. Yaida,The Viscosity Bound and Causality Violation,Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2008) 191601, [0802.3318]

    2008 arXiv

  113. [123]

    X. O. Camanho, J. D. Edelstein and M. F. Paulos,Lovelock theories, holography and the fate of the viscosity bound,JHEP��(2011) 127, [1010.1682]

    2011 arXiv

  114. [124]

    Erdmenger, P

    J. Erdmenger, P. Kerner and H. Zeller,Non-universal shear viscosity from Einstein gravity, Phys. Lett. B���(2011) 301–304, [1011.5912]

    2011 arXiv

  115. [125]

    Rebhan and D

    A. Rebhan and D. Steineder,Violation of the Holographic Viscosity Bound in a Strongly Coupled Anisotropic Plasma,Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2012) 021601, [1110.6825]

    2012 arXiv

  116. [126]

    Jahnke, A

    V. Jahnke, A. S. Misobuchi and D. Trancanelli,Holographic renormalization and anisotropic black branes in higher curvature gravity,JHEP��(2015) 122, [1411.5964]

    2015 arXiv

  117. [127]

    Grozdanov and A

    S. Grozdanov and A. O. Starinets,Second-order transport, quasinormal modes and zero-viscosity limit in the Gauss-Bonnet holographic fluid,JHEP��(2017) 166, [1611.07053]

    2017 arXiv

  118. [128]

    X. O. Camanho and J. D. Edelstein,Causality constraints in AdS/CFT from conformal collider physics and Gauss-Bonnet gravity,JHEP��(2010) 007, [0911.3160]

    2010 arXiv

  119. [129]

    Buchel, J

    A. Buchel, J. Escobedo, R. C. Myers, M. F. Paulos, A. Sinha and M. Smolkin,Holographic GB gravity in arbitrary dimensions,JHEP��(2010) 111, [0911.4257]

    2010 arXiv

  120. [130]

    Qi and Z

    X.-L. Qi and Z. Yang,Butterfly velocity and bulk causal structure,1705.01728

    arXiv

  121. [131]

    Fischler, V

    W. Fischler, V. Jahnke and J. F. Pedraza,Chaos and entanglement spreading in a non-commutative gauge theory,JHEP��(2018) 072, [1808.10050]

    2018 arXiv

  122. [132]

    Eccles, W

    S. Eccles, W. Fischler, T. Guglielmo, J. F. Pedraza and S. Racz,Speeding up the spread of quantum information in chaotic systems,JHEP��(2021) 019, [2108.12688]

    2021 arXiv

  123. [133]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Black holes and the butterfly effect,JHEP��(2014) 067, [1306.0622]

    2014 arXiv

  124. [134]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Multiple Shocks,JHEP��(2014) 046, [1312.3296]

    2014 arXiv

  125. [135]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Stringy effects in scrambling,JHEP��(2015) 132, [1412.6087]

    2015 arXiv

  126. [136]

    Dray and G

    T. Dray and G. ’t Hooft,The Gravitational Shock Wave of a Massless Particle,Nucl. Phys. B���(1985) 173–188

    1985

  127. [137]

    ’t Hooft,Graviton Dominance in Ultrahigh-Energy Scattering,Phys

    G. ’t Hooft,Graviton Dominance in Ultrahigh-Energy Scattering,Phys. Lett. B���(1987) 61–63

    1987

  128. [138]

    Cornalba, M

    L. Cornalba, M. S. Costa, J. Penedones and R. Schiappa,Eikonal Approximation in AdS/CFT: From Shock Waves to Four-Point Functions,JHEP��(2007) 019, [hep-th/0611122]

    2007 arXiv

  129. [139]

    Hotta and M

    M. Hotta and M. Tanaka,Shock wave geometry with nonvanishing cosmological constant, Class. Quant. Grav.��(1993) 307–314

    1993

  130. [140]

    Hotta and M

    M. Hotta and M. Tanaka,Gravitational shock waves and quantum fields in the de Sitter space,Phys. Rev. D��(1993) 3323–3329. – 52 –

    1993

  131. [141]

    Sfetsos,On gravitational shock waves in curved space-times,Nucl

    K. Sfetsos,On gravitational shock waves in curved space-times,Nucl. Phys. B���(1995) 721–745, [hep-th/9408169]

    1995 arXiv

  132. [142]

    R. R. Poojary,BTZ dynamics and chaos,JHEP��(2020) 048, [1812.10073]

    2020 arXiv

  133. [143]

    Jahnke, K.-Y

    V. Jahnke, K.-Y. Kim and J. Yoon,On the Chaos Bound in Rotating Black Holes,JHEP ��(2019) 037, [1903.09086]

    2019 arXiv

  134. [144]

    Cotler and K

    J. Cotler and K. Jensen,A theory of reparameterizations for AdS � gravity,JHEP��(2019) 079, [1808.03263]

    2019 arXiv

  135. [145]

    A. Kitaev,A simple model of quantum holography, (2014) http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/, http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/, Talks at KITP, April 7, 2015 and May 27, (2015)

    2014

  136. [146]

    Jensen,Chaos in AdS � Holography,Phys

    K. Jensen,Chaos in AdS � Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2016) 111601, [1605.06098]

    2016 arXiv

  137. [147]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,PTEP����(2016) 12C104, [1606.01857]

    2016 arXiv

  138. [148]

    Engels¨ oy, T

    J. Engels¨ oy, T. G. Mertens and H. Verlinde,An investigation of AdS � backreaction and holography,JHEP��(2016) 139, [1606.03438]

    2016 arXiv

  139. [149]

    Gu, X.-L

    Y. Gu, X.-L. Qi and D. Stanford,Local criticality, diffusion and chaos in generalized Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models,JHEP��(2017) 125, [1609.07832]

    2017 arXiv

  140. [150]

    Yuan, X.-H

    H. Yuan, X.-H. Ge, K.-Y. Kim, C.-W. Ji and Y. Ahn,Pole-skipping points in 2D gravity and SYK model,JHEP��(2023) 157, [2303.04801]

    2023 arXiv

  141. [151]

    Susskind,Addendum to Fast Scramblers,1101.6048

    L. Susskind,Addendum to Fast Scramblers,1101.6048

    arXiv

  142. [152]

    Geng,Non-local entanglement and fast scrambling in de-Sitter holography,Annals Phys

    H. Geng,Non-local entanglement and fast scrambling in de-Sitter holography,Annals Phys. ���(2021) 168402, [2005.00021]

    2021 arXiv

  143. [153]

    Blommaert,Searching for butterflies in dS JT gravity,JHEP��(2023) 122, [2010.14539]

    A. Blommaert,Searching for butterflies in dS JT gravity,JHEP��(2023) 122, [2010.14539]

    2023 arXiv

  144. [154]

    Aalsma and G

    L. Aalsma and G. Shiu,Chaos and complementarity in de Sitter space,JHEP��(2020) 152, [2002.01326]

    2020 arXiv

  145. [155]

    Gao and R

    S. Gao and R. M. Wald,Theorems on gravitational time delay and related issues,Class. Quant. Grav.��(2000) 4999–5008, [gr-qc/0007021]

    2000 arXiv

  146. [156]

    P. Gao, D. L. Jafferis and A. C. Wall,Traversable Wormholes via a Double Trace Deformation,JHEP��(2017) 151, [1608.05687]

    2017 arXiv

  147. [157]

    Maldacena, D

    J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Diving into traversable wormholes,Fortsch. Phys. ��(2017) 1700034, [1704.05333]

    2017 arXiv

  148. [158]

    Berkooz, M

    M. Berkooz, M. Isachenkov, V. Narovlansky and G. Torrents,Towards a full solution of the large N double-scaled SYK model,JHEP��(2019) 079, [1811.02584]

    2019 arXiv

  149. [159]

    Susskind,Scrambling in Double-Scaled SYK and De Sitter Space,2205.00315

    L. Susskind,Scrambling in Double-Scaled SYK and De Sitter Space,2205.00315

    arXiv

  150. [160]

    H. W. Lin,The bulk Hilbert space of double scaled SYK,JHEP��(2022) 060, [2208.07032]

    2022 arXiv

  151. [161]

    Susskind,De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit,2209.09999

    L. Susskind,De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit,2209.09999

    arXiv

  152. [162]

    A. A. Rahman,dS JT Gravity and Double-Scaled SYK,2209.09997. – 53 –

    arXiv

  153. [163]

    Narovlansky and H

    V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde,Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter Holography,2310.16994

    arXiv

  154. [164]

    Verlinde,Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity,JHEP��(2025) 076, [2402.00635]

    H. Verlinde,Double-scaled SYK, chords and de Sitter gravity,JHEP��(2025) 076, [2402.00635]

    2025 arXiv

  155. [165]

    Bhattacharjee, P

    B. Bhattacharjee, P. Nandy and T. Pathak,Krylov complexity in large q and double-scaled SYK model,JHEP��(2023) 099, [2210.02474]

    2023 arXiv

  156. [166]

    A. Goel, V. Narovlansky and H. Verlinde,Semiclassical geometry in double-scaled SYK, JHEP��(2023) 093, [2301.05732]

    2023 arXiv

  157. [167]

    Rabinovici, A

    E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,A bulk manifestation of Krylov complexity,JHEP��(2023) 213, [2305.04355]

    2023 arXiv

  158. [168]

    Blommaert, T

    A. Blommaert, T. G. Mertens and S. Yao,Dynamical actions and q-representation theory for double-scaled SYK,JHEP��(2024) 067, [2306.00941]

    2024 arXiv

  159. [169]

    Ambrosini, E

    M. Ambrosini, E. Rabinovici, A. S´ anchez-Garrido, R. Shir and J. Sonner,Operator K-complexity in DSSYK: Krylov complexity equals bulk length,2412.15318

    arXiv

  160. [170]

    Xu,Von Neumann Algebras in Double-Scaled SYK,2403.09021

    J. Xu,Von Neumann Algebras in Double-Scaled SYK,2403.09021

    arXiv

  161. [171]

    Xu,On chord dynamics and complexity growth in double-scaled SYK,JHEP��(2025) 259, [2411.04251]

    J. Xu,On chord dynamics and complexity growth in double-scaled SYK,JHEP��(2025) 259, [2411.04251]

    2025 arXiv

  162. [172]

    M. P. Heller, J. Papalini and T. Schuhmann,Krylov spread complexity as holographic complexity beyond JT gravity,2412.17785

  163. [173]

    Chapman, D

    S. Chapman, D. A. Galante and E. D. Kramer,Holographic complexity and de Sitter space, JHEP��(2022) 198, [2110.05522]

    2022 arXiv

  164. [174]

    Reynolds and S

    A. Reynolds and S. F. Ross,Complexity in de Sitter Space,Class. Quant. Grav.��(2017) 175013, [1706.03788]

    2017 arXiv

  165. [175]

    Jørstad, R

    E. Jørstad, R. C. Myers and S.-M. Ruan,Holographic complexity in dS d�� ,JHEP�� (2022) 119, [2202.10684]

    2022 arXiv

  166. [176]

    Galante,Geodesics, complexity and holography in (A)dS �,PoS���������(2022) 359

    D. Galante,Geodesics, complexity and holography in (A)dS �,PoS���������(2022) 359

    2022

  167. [177]

    Auzzi, G

    R. Auzzi, G. Nardelli, G. P. Ungureanu and N. Zenoni,Volume complexity of dS bubbles, Phys. Rev. D���(2023) 026006, [2302.03584]

    2023 arXiv

  168. [178]

    Anegawa, N

    T. Anegawa, N. Iizuka, S. K. Sake and N. Zenoni,Is action complexity better for de Sitter space in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity?,JHEP��(2023) 213, [2303.05025]

    2023 arXiv

  169. [179]

    Anegawa and N

    T. Anegawa and N. Iizuka,Shock waves and delay of hyperfast growth in de Sitter complexity,JHEP��(2023) 115, [2304.14620]

    2023 arXiv

  170. [180]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, M. P. Heller and S. Van der Schueren,Complexity equals anything can grow forever in de Sitter space,Phys. Rev. D���(2024) 066009, [2305.11280]

    2024 arXiv

  171. [181]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, A. K. Patra and J. F. Pedraza,Entangled universes in dS wedge holography,JHEP��(2023) 156, [2308.05666]

    2023 arXiv

  172. [182]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, S. Baiguera and N. Zenoni,Holographic complexity of the extended Schwarzschild-de Sitter space,JHEP��(2024) 201, [2402.01357]

    2024 arXiv

  173. [183]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez,Towards complexity in de Sitter space from the doubled-scaled Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,JHEP��(2024) 107, [2403.13186]. – 54 –

    2024 arXiv

  174. [184]

    Allen and A

    B. Allen and A. Folacci,The Massless Minimally Coupled Scalar Field in De Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. D��(1987) 3771

    1987

  175. [185]

    D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu,Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon, 2411.08090

    arXiv

  176. [186]

    Emparan, J

    R. Emparan, J. F. Pedraza, A. Svesko, M. Tomaˇ sevi´ c and M. R. Visser,Black holes in dS�, JHEP��(2022) 073, [2207.03302]

    2022 arXiv

  177. [187]

    Yuan, X.-H

    H. Yuan, X.-H. Ge and K.-Y. Kim,Pole-skipping in two-dimensional de Sitter spacetime and double-scaled SYK model in the classical limit,2408.12330

    arXiv

  178. [188]

    Giataganas,Chaotic Motion near Black Hole and Cosmological Horizons,Fortsch

    D. Giataganas,Chaotic Motion near Black Hole and Cosmological Horizons,Fortsch. Phys. ��(2022) 2200001, [2112.02081]

    2022 arXiv

  179. [189]

    P. C. Aichelburg and R. U. Sexl,On the gravitational field of a massless particle,General Relativity and Gravitation�(Dec, 1971) 303–312

    1971

  180. [190]

    Dray and G

    T. Dray and G. ’t Hooft,The gravitational shock wave of a massless particle,Nuclear Physics B���(1985) 173–188

    1985

  181. [191]

    Hotta and M

    M. Hotta and M. Tanaka,Shock-wave geometry with nonvanishing cosmological constant, Classical and Quantum Gravity��(Feb., 1993) 307–314

    1993

  182. [192]

    Hotta,Gravitational shock waves and quantum fields in de sitter space,Physical Review D��(1993) 3323–3329

    M. Hotta,Gravitational shock waves and quantum fields in de sitter space,Physical Review D��(1993) 3323–3329

    1993

  183. [193]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez,C=Anything and the switchback effect in Schwarzschild-de Sitter space,JHEP��(2024) 062, [2309.05848]

    2024 arXiv

  184. [194]

    Dyson, M

    L. Dyson, M. Kleban and L. Susskind,Disturbing implications of a cosmological constant, JHEP��(2002) 011, [hep-th/0208013]

    2002 arXiv

  185. [195]

    Susskind,Black Holes Hint towards De Sitter Matrix Theory,Universe�(2023) 368, [2109.01322]

    L. Susskind,Black Holes Hint towards De Sitter Matrix Theory,Universe�(2023) 368, [2109.01322]

    2023 arXiv

  186. [196]

    Bhattacharya,Particle creation by de Sitter black holes revisited,Phys

    S. Bhattacharya,Particle creation by de Sitter black holes revisited,Phys. Rev. D��(2018) 125013, [1810.13260]

    2018 arXiv

  187. [197]

    Bousso,Holography in general space-times,JHEP��(1999) 028, [hep-th/9906022]

    R. Bousso,Holography in general space-times,JHEP��(1999) 028, [hep-th/9906022]

    1999 arXiv

  188. [198]

    Chang-Young, M

    E. Chang-Young, M. Eune, K. Kimm and D. Lee,Schwarzschild-de Sitter black hole from entropic viewpoint,Mod. Phys. Lett. A��(2011) 1975–1983, [1011.3960]

    2011 arXiv

  189. [199]

    Huhtamo,Elements of screenology: Toward an archaeology of the screen, vol

    E. Huhtamo,Elements of screenology: Toward an archaeology of the screen, vol. 7. Japan Society of Image Arts and Sciences Kyoto, 2004

    2004

  190. [200]

    Belisle,The dimensional image: Overlaps in stereoscopic, cinematic, and digital depth, Film Criticism�����(2013) 117–137

    B. Belisle,The dimensional image: Overlaps in stereoscopic, cinematic, and digital depth, Film Criticism�����(2013) 117–137

    2013

  191. [201]

    an opportunity to grapple with the picture plane

    E. Polonyi,“an opportunity to grapple with the picture plane. . . ”: The stereo-illusion ’s history of frustration, inArt and Artifice in Visual Culture, pp. 155–171. Routledge, 2024

    2024

  192. [202]

    Polonyi,Try to Hold Your Gaze Steady —exhibition 2/19 - 5/2, 2019, Curated by Viola Lukacs, Radiator Gallery, New York, New York, USA, 2019

    E. Polonyi,Try to Hold Your Gaze Steady —exhibition 2/19 - 5/2, 2019, Curated by Viola Lukacs, Radiator Gallery, New York, New York, USA, 2019

    2019

  193. [203]

    J. M. Maldacena,Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,JHEP��(2003) 021, [hep-th/0106112]

    2003 arXiv

  194. [204]

    Faulkner, H

    T. Faulkner, H. Liu and M. Rangamani,Integrating out geometry: Holographic Wilsonian RG and the membrane paradigm,JHEP��(2011) 051, [1010.4036]. – 55 –

    2011 arXiv

  195. [205]

    Guijosa, Y

    A. Guijosa, Y. D. Olivas and J. F. Pedraza,Holographic coarse-graining: correlators from the entanglement wedge and other reduced geometries,JHEP��(2022) 118, [2201.01786]

    2022 arXiv

  196. [206]

    S. E. Aguilar-Gutierrez and J. Xu,Geometry of Chord Intertwiner, Multiple Shocks and Switchback in Double-Scaled SYK,2506.19013

  197. [207]

    Y. Gu, A. Lucas and X.-L. Qi,Energy diffusion and the butterfly effect in inhomogeneous Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev chains,SciPost Phys.�(2017) 018, [1702.08462]

    2017 arXiv

  198. [208]

    Y. Chen, H. Zhai and P. Zhang,Tunable Quantum Chaos in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model Coupled to a Thermal Bath,JHEP��(2017) 150, [1705.09818]

    2017 arXiv

  199. [209]

    Jian and H

    S.-K. Jian and H. Yao,Solvable Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models in higher dimensions: from diffusion to many-body localization,Phys. Rev. Lett.���(2017) 206602, [1703.02051]

    2017 arXiv

  200. [210]

    Mezei and G

    M. Mezei and G. S´ arosi,Chaos in the butterfly cone,JHEP��(2020) 186, [1908.03574]

    2020 arXiv

  201. [211]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,Stringy effects in scrambling,Journal of High Energy Physics����(May, 2015) 132

    2015

  202. [212]

    Gharibyan, M

    H. Gharibyan, M. Hanada, B. Swingle and M. Tezuka,Quantum Lyapunov Spectrum,JHEP ��(2019) 082, [1809.01671]

    2019 arXiv

  203. [213]

    M. F. Shlesinger, G. M. Zaslavsky and U. Frisch, eds.,L´ evy Flights and Related Topics in Physics, vol. 450 ofLecture Notes in Physics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1995, 10.1007/BFb0104804

    1995 doi

  204. [214]

    Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001.hep-th/0106109

    E. Witten,Quantum gravity in de Sitter space, inStrings 2001: International Conference, 6, 2001.hep-th/0106109

    2001 arXiv

  205. [215]

    Bousso, A

    R. Bousso, A. Maloney and A. Strominger,Conformal vacua and entropy in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D��(2002) 104039, [hep-th/0112218]

    2002 arXiv

  206. [216]

    Balasubramanian, J

    V. Balasubramanian, J. de Boer and D. Minic,Notes on de Sitter space and holography, Class. Quant. Grav.��(2002) 5655–5700, [hep-th/0207245]

    2002 arXiv

  207. [217]

    Anninos, T

    D. Anninos, T. Hartman and A. Strominger,Higher Spin Realization of the dS/CFT Correspondence,Class. Quant. Grav.��(2017) 015009, [1108.5735]

    2017 arXiv

  208. [218]

    Abdalla, K

    E. Abdalla, K. H. C. Castello-Branco and A. Lima-Santos,Support of dS / CFT correspondence from space-time perturbations,Phys. Rev. D��(2002) 104018, [hep-th/0208065]

    2002 arXiv

  209. [219]

    Lopez-Ortega,Quasinormal modes of D-dimensional de Sitter spacetime,Gen

    A. Lopez-Ortega,Quasinormal modes of D-dimensional de Sitter spacetime,Gen. Rel. Grav.��(2006) 1565–1591, [gr-qc/0605027]. – 56 –

    2006 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.