Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 62 references

RAGSR: Regional Attention Guided Diffusion for Image Super-Resolution

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that explicit alignment of regional captions to image regions is what unlocks fine-grained detail in text-guided diffusion super-resolution.

desk verdict Plausible regional-attention recipe for text-guided super-resolution, but the headline SOTA claim rests on an unverified DIV2K-Val row and the region-control ablation gains are smaller than the text claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16158 v1 pith:AH7WPXNC submitted 2025-08-22 cs.CV

Haodong He , Yancheng Bai , Rui Lan , Xu Duan , Lei Sun , Xiangxiang Chu , Gui-Song Xia This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords single-imagesuper-resolutiondiffusionmodelstext-guidedgenerationregionalattentionvision-languageopen-vocabularydetectioncaptionsperceptualquality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

RAGSR is trying to show that the limit of text-guided diffusion super-resolution is not the diffusion prior but the granularity of the text: a single global caption cannot tell the model which description belongs to which object, so small regions come out blurred or semantically wrong. The paper's solution is to extract region-text pairs from the low-resolution input—detect foreground regions, caption each one—and then modify the transformer attention inside the diffusion model so that each region reads only its own caption. On three benchmarks, this yields the best or second-best scores on most fidelity and perceptual metrics, including a 6.5% PSNR and 8.1% LPIPS gain over the second-best method on one benchmark. A reader should care because it identifies a concrete, pluggable cause of failure in text-guided restoration and a mechanism—regional attention masks—that directly targets it.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the regional attention mask Mregion, a binary mask assembled from four blocks—text-to-text (Mt2t), text-to-image (Mt2i), image-to-text (Mi2t), and image-to-image (Mi2i). For each detected box t, the image-to-text block is the outer product of a flattened region mask and its caption mask, so visual tokens inside the box attend only to that region's caption; the text-to-image block is its transpose, and self-attention blocks only connect tokens within the same region plus a background region. The mask is inserted into the attention computation of the pre-trained text-to-image diffusion backbone, turning per-region captions into hard spatial constraints on generati

What would settle it

Run the full model on a degraded image set, then run it again with the regional masks replaced by identity masks, or with region-caption pairs randomly permuted across boxes. If PSNR and LPIPS stay within noise of the full model, the regional alignment is not the cause of the reported gains; if they collapse, the alignment is load-bearing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that explicit regional alignment—not just richer captions—is what lets a pre-trained text-to-image diffusion model reconstruct fine details in super-resolution. The authors argue that previous methods either use tags without descriptive content or global captions that contain no spatial anchors, so the model cannot bind a description to its location. RAGSR makes that binding explicit: an open-vocabulary detector produces bounding boxes for foreground regions, a fine-tuned vision-language model generates a dedicated caption for each box, and a regional attention mask restricts each region's image tokens to attend only to their caption and vice versa. The authors r

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise—which the paper's own Conclusion concedes may fail—is that the detector and the fine-tuned vision-language model reliably find and describe every salient region even in heavily degraded low-resolution images; a miss or mislabel aligns the attention mask to the wrong content.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Regional attention control improves four of eight metrics on RealSR and produces the largest gains on DIV2K-Val, so the mechanism can be added to a fixed diffusion backbone without retraining it from scratch.
  • Fine-tuned caption extraction matters as much as the attention mask: replacing captions with tags or with captions from an unfine-tuned vision-language model consistently lowers fidelity and perceptual scores.
  • Injecting the regional mask for more diffusion steps raises PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS, and FID while slightly lowering no-reference scores, so there is a tunable fidelity-versus-naturalness knob.
  • The method works across benchmark datasets with real degradation, suggesting the regional-alignment recipe transfers beyond synthetic degradation pipelines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If regional alignment is truly the active ingredient, then deliberately shuffling region captions between boxes should degrade LPIPS markedly; this offers a cheap, label-free audit of the mechanism.
  • The fixed five-box budget suggests diminishing returns may set in for scenes with many small objects; testing larger budgets on dense-scene datasets would reveal whether the box count or the detector quality is the bottleneck.
  • The same regional-mask construction could apply to other spatially grounded conditional generation tasks—deblurring, inpainting, or scene text restoration—wherever a local semantic region needs precise guidance.
  • Because the whole pipeline inherits the detector's and vision-language model's failure modes on severe degradation, a natural next step is iterative refinement: use the super-resolved output to re-detect and re-caption, then re-run the regional attention pass.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes RAGSR, a two-stage text-guided single-image super-resolution method. Stage 1 fine-tunes Qwen2.5-VL on degraded LR images and uses LLMDet-generated bounding boxes to produce global and region-specific captions. Stage 2 injects these region-text pairs into Stable Diffusion 2 with ControlNet through a regional attention mask that restricts cross- and self-attention so that each caption interacts only with its corresponding spatial region. Experiments compare against recent SISR methods on DIV2K-Val, RealSR, DrealSR, and RealLR200, with ablations on prompt type, VLM fine-tuning, regional attention control, and injection steps. The central claim is that explicit regional attention alignment improves fine-grained detail reconstruction and yields state-of-the-art performance on the three benchmarks.

Significance. Explicit region-level text alignment is a reasonable and timely extension of text-guided super-resolution, and the paper presents a clear architecture, explicit mask equations, a broad metric suite, and useful appendix details on training and inference speed. If the DIV2K-Val result can be validated under a consistent evaluation protocol, the reported 1.63 dB PSNR improvement over the second-best method would be substantial. However, the paper's own tables show mixed results on the real-world benchmarks, the controlled ablation of the key component is small and inconsistent across no-reference metrics, and the evaluation protocol for DIV2K-Val is unspecified. The contribution is plausible but not yet convincingly demonstrated.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.1, Table 1] The evaluation protocol for DIV2K-Val is not specified. The text states that training pairs use the Real-ESRGAN degradation pipeline and that evaluation 'follows previous works' for ×4 SISR, but it does not state which degradation is used to generate LR inputs for DIV2K-Val, RealSR, or DrealSR. Table 1 reports PSNR 23.37 for RAGSR versus 21.94 for the next best baseline, a 1.63 dB gap that is unusually large and could be an artifact of LR-degradation mismatch if baseline numbers were taken from papers using a different protocol. Please specify the exact validation degradation, report whether the same LR inputs were used for all methods, and state the provenance of every baseline number.
  2. [§4.2, Table 1] The central 'state-of-the-art' claim is not supported by the table itself. On RealSR, RAGSR's PSNR (24.88) is below SeeSR (25.18) and R-ESRGAN (25.69), and its LPIPS (0.3082) is worse than SeeSR (0.3009) and MMSR (0.2952). On DrealSR, R-ESRGAN leads PSNR by 1.31 dB and SeeSR leads LPIPS (0.3174 vs 0.3376). No-reference metrics are also mixed: on RealSR, MUSIQ is 70.00 for RAGSR versus 71.33 for MMSR, and on DrealSR, MANIQA is 0.6189 for RAGSR versus 0.6301 for MMSR. The SOTA claim should be restricted to the specific metric subsets where RAGSR actually leads, with per-dataset statements rather than a blanket claim.
  3. [§4.3, Table 2] The ablation of the paper's key component, regional attention control, shows small and statistically unconvincing gains. Comparing rows 1 and 4, regional control improves PSNR by only 0.06 dB, SSIM by 0.0026, LPIPS by 0.0025, and DISTS by 0.0014, while NIQE, MANIQA, MUSIQ, and CLIPIQA all degrade. No error bars or multiple-seed results are reported, and the experiment is on a single dataset (RealSR). This is too weak to support the 'critical' role claimed in the text and Figure 5. Please provide variance estimates, multiple runs, or additional benchmarks before claiming that regional attention control is the source of the observed gains.
  4. [§5] The Conclusion concedes that LLMDet may miss objects and the fine-tuned Qwen2.5-VL may generate inaccurate captions under severe degradation. Because the entire pipeline depends on accurate region-text pairs, this limitation directly affects the credibility of the quantitative results on real-world benchmarks. Please quantify how often the region-text extraction pipeline succeeds on the test sets used in Table 1 (e.g., detection and caption accuracy on RealSR/DrealSR), and discuss how failures affect the reported averages. As written, the main quantitative claims cover exactly the regime the paper admits is unreliable.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] References [6] and [7] appear to be duplicates: both are listed as 'Generative pretraining from pixels' by Chen et al. Please merge or disambiguate.
  2. [§3.1] 'LLaV A-Cap' should be 'LLaVA-Cap' in the dataset list.
  3. [Table 1 note] The table note says 'the code of MMSR has not been open-sourced'; check the spelling/formatting of 'MMSR' for consistency with the method name.
  4. [Appendix A.3] Minor typographical issue: '4 × super-resolution' should be '4× super-resolution'.
  5. [General] No code or model weights are mentioned. Given the reliance on fine-tuned Qwen2.5-VL, LLMDet, and the custom attention injection, releasing the fine-tuned VLM and training/inference scripts would substantially aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claim is evaluated on external benchmarks and the regional attention design is explicitly credited to an external prior work.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The caption-extraction model is trained with Eq. (1), a cross-entropy loss against ground-truth annotations from external datasets, not against the SR outputs, so the captions are not statistically forced to produce the reported SR gains. The regional attention mask in Sec. 3.2 is explicitly credited to [4] (Chen et al., 2024), an external source, and the masks are constructed from detected boxes and captions rather than from the evaluation metrics. The headline SOTA claim is assessed on DIV2K-Val, RealSR, DrealSR, and RealLR200 against published baselines, with paired metrics (PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS/DISTS/FID) that are not by construction equal to the method's inputs. The only author-overlapping citations ([25], [49], and earlier [11]-[12] in a survey list) appear in generic enumerations of generative backbones and are not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or fitted interpolation is imported to force the choice. The skeptic's concern about the unspecified LR degradation protocol for DIV2K-Val is a measurement-validity issue, not a circular reduction, and under the stated rules it does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical or conceptual entities. Regional attention masks are a mechanism constructed from existing attention operations. The main assumptions are about the reliability of upstream detection and captioning modules and the transferability of the regional prompting technique.

free parameters (2)
  • num_boxes_per_image = 5
    Set to 5 based on the observed average (approximately 4) and median (3) of LLMDet detections in the training set. Fewer boxes are padded with zeros and empty captions.
  • detection_confidence_threshold = 0.4
    Bounding boxes with confidence below 0.4 are filtered out. This threshold is chosen without a reported sensitivity analysis.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Regional attention masking, as defined by equations (3)-(6), improves text-to-image alignment and transfers from diffusion transformers to Stable Diffusion 2 with ControlNet.
    The paper adopts the mask construction from reference [4] without re-deriving it and assumes it remains effective when applied to the SD2 architecture and the super-resolution task.
  • domain assumption LLMDet provides reliable object bounding boxes on low-resolution degraded images.
    The paper uses LLMDet without fine-tuning and relies on its detections to define regional masks. The conclusion admits LLMDet may miss objects in heavily degraded images.
  • domain assumption The fine-tuned Qwen2.5-VL generates accurate region-specific captions for low-resolution images.
    The method depends on the VLM's captions for each detected region. The conclusion notes the fine-tuned model may still produce inaccurate captions under severe degradation.
  • domain assumption The two-stage attention (global then regional) rather than explicit fusion enables the model to learn the relative contribution of global and regional features.
    The paper asserts this design choice avoids manual weight tuning, but provides no theoretical justification or controlled comparison against explicit fusion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of RAGSR: Regional Attention Guided Diffusion for Image Super-Resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AH7WPXNC

@misc{pith2026250816158,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: RAGSR: Regional Attention Guided Diffusion for Image Super-Resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AH7WPXNC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16158}
}
read the original abstract

The rich textual information of large vision-language models (VLMs) combined with the powerful generative prior of pre-trained text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models has achieved impressive performance in single-image super-resolution (SISR). However, existing methods still face significant challenges in generating clear and accurate regional details, particularly in scenarios involving multiple objects. This challenge primarily stems from a lack of fine-grained regional descriptions and the models' insufficient ability to capture complex prompts. To address these limitations, we propose a Regional Attention Guided Super-Resolution (RAGSR) method that explicitly extracts localized fine-grained information and effectively encodes it through a novel regional attention mechanism, enabling both enhanced detail and overall visually coherent SR results. Specifically, RAGSR localizes object regions in an image and assigns fine-grained caption to each region, which are formatted as region-text pairs as textual priors for T2I models. A regional guided attention is then leveraged to ensure that each region-text pair is properly considered in the attention process while preventing unwanted interactions between unrelated region-text pairs. By leveraging this attention mechanism, our approach offers finer control over the integration of text and image information, thereby effectively overcoming limitations faced by traditional SISR techniques. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that our approach exhibits superior performance in generating perceptually authentic visual details while maintaining contextual consistency compared to existing approaches.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.16158 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. RAGSR leverages both global textual captions and regional textual captions to infuse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of RAGSR. (a) The framework for fine-grained information extraction. We [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The outputs of Qwen2.5-VL with and without fine-tuning. The fine-tuned model extracts [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative comparisons of RAGSR and other SISR methods. RAGSR demonstrates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Ablation of regional attention control. Two identical RAGSR models are provided with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Super-resolution results of RAGSR on real-world images with varying resolutions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    Training-free regional prompting for diffusion transformers

    Anthony Chen, Jianjin Xu, Wenzhao Zheng, Gaole Dai, Yida Wang, Renrui Zhang, Haofan Wang, and Shanghang Zhang. Training-free regional prompting for diffusion transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02395, 2024. 5

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study

    Eirikur Agustsson and Radu Timofte. Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 126–135, 2017. 2, 6

    work page 2017

  3. [2]

    Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, et al. Qwen2. 5-vl technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923, 2025. 2, 3, 4, 7

    arXiv 2025

  4. [3]

    Toward real-world single image super-resolution: A new benchmark and a new model

    Jianrui Cai, Hui Zeng, Hongwei Yong, Zisheng Cao, and Lei Zhang. Toward real-world single image super-resolution: A new benchmark and a new model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3086–3095, 2019. 2, 6

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Real-world blind super-resolution via feature matching with implicit high-resolution priors

    Chaofeng Chen, Xinyu Shi, Yipeng Qin, Xiaoming Li, Xiaoguang Han, Tao Yang, and Shihui Guo. Real-world blind super-resolution via feature matching with implicit high-resolution priors. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 1329–1338, 2022. 7

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Generative pretraining from pixels

    Mark Chen, Alec Radford, Rewon Child, Jeffrey Wu, Heewoo Jun, David Luan, and Ilya Sutskever. Generative pretraining from pixels. In Hal Daumé III and Aarti Singh, editors, Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 119 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1691–1703. PMLR, 13–18 Jul 2020. 2

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Generative pretraining from pixels

    Mark Chen, Alec Radford, Rewon Child, Jeffrey Wu, Heewoo Jun, David Luan, and Ilya Sutskever. Generative pretraining from pixels. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1691–1703. PMLR, 2020. 2

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Activating more pixels in image super-resolution transformer, 2023

    Xiangyu Chen, Xintao Wang, Jiantao Zhou, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Activating more pixels in image super-resolution transformer, 2023. 3

    work page 2023

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    Dual aggregation transformer for image super-resolution, 2023

    Zheng Chen, Yulun Zhang, Jinjin Gu, Linghe Kong, Xiaokang Yang, and Fisher Yu. Dual aggregation transformer for image super-resolution, 2023. 3

    2023

  2. [10]

    Masked- attention mask transformer for universal image segmentation

    Bowen Cheng, Ishan Misra, Alexander G Schwing, Alexander Kirillov, and Rohit Girdhar. Masked- attention mask transformer for universal image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1290–1299, 2022. 3

    2022

  3. [11]

    Fast, accurate and lightweight super- resolution with neural architecture search

    Xiangxiang Chu, Bo Zhang, Hailong Ma, Ruijun Xu, and Qingyuan Li. Fast, accurate and lightweight super- resolution with neural architecture search. In 2020 25th International conference on pattern recognition (ICPR), pages 59–64. IEEE, 2021. 3

    2020

  4. [12]

    Multi-objective reinforced evolution in mobile neural architecture search

    Xiangxiang Chu, Bo Zhang, and Ruijun Xu. Multi-objective reinforced evolution in mobile neural architecture search. In european conference on computer vision workshops, pages 99–113. Springer, 2020. 3

    2020

  5. [13]

    Coco (2017): An informational approach on life after death

    Hans Contreras-Pulache, Lucía Gomez-Saenz, Anie S Soriano-Abal, Alonso Zorrilla, and MOYA Jeel. Coco (2017): An informational approach on life after death. Director, 2017. 6

    2017

  6. [14]

    Second-order attention network for single image super-resolution

    Tao Dai, Jianrui Cai, Yongbing Zhang, Shu-Tao Xia, and Lei Zhang. Second-order attention network for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 11065–11074, 2019. 3

    2019

  7. [15]

    Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity

    Keyan Ding, Kede Ma, Shiqi Wang, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: Unifying structure and texture similarity. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 44(5):2567–2581,

  8. [16]

    Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution

    Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution. pages 184–199, 2014. 3

    2014

  9. [17]

    Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks

    Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 38(2):295–307,

  10. [18]

    Llmdet: Learning strong open-vocabulary object detectors under the supervision of large language models

    Shenghao Fu, Qize Yang, Qijie Mo, Junkai Yan, Xihan Wei, Jingke Meng, Xiaohua Xie, and Wei-Shi Zheng. Llmdet: Learning strong open-vocabulary object detectors under the supervision of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18954, 2025. 2, 3, 4

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Generative adversarial networks.Communications of the ACM, 63(11):139– 144, 2020

    Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. Generative adversarial networks.Communications of the ACM, 63(11):139– 144, 2020. 3

    2020

  12. [20]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 6

    2017

  13. [21]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685,

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gqa: A new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering

    Drew A Hudson and Christopher D Manning. Gqa: A new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6700–6709, 2019. 6

    2019

  15. [23]

    A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks

    Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4401–4410, 2019. 6

    2019

  16. [24]

    Musiq: Multi-scale image quality transformer

    Junjie Ke, Qifei Wang, Yilin Wang, Peyman Milanfar, and Feng Yang. Musiq: Multi-scale image quality transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 5148–5157, 2021. 6

    2021

  17. [25]

    Flux-text: A simple and advanced diffusion transformer baseline for scene text editing, 2025

    Rui Lan, Yancheng Bai, Xu Duan, Mingxing Li, Lei Sun, and Xiangxiang Chu. Flux-text: A simple and advanced diffusion transformer baseline for scene text editing, 2025. 2

    2025

  18. [26]

    Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer

    Bo Li, Yuanhan Zhang, Dong Guo, Renrui Zhang, Feng Li, Hao Zhang, Kaichen Zhang, Peiyuan Zhang, Yanwei Li, Ziwei Liu, et al. Llava-onevision: Easy visual task transfer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03326,

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Multi-scale residual network for image super-resolution

    Juncheng Li, Faming Fang, Kangfu Mei, and Guixu Zhang. Multi-scale residual network for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 517–532,

  20. [28]

    Lsdir: A large scale dataset for image restoration

    Yawei Li, Kai Zhang, Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Ce Liu, Rui Gong, Yulun Zhang, Hao Tang, Yun Liu, Denis Demandolx, et al. Lsdir: A large scale dataset for image restoration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1775–1787...

    2023

  21. [29]

    Details or artifacts: A locally discriminative learning approach to realistic image super-resolution

    Jie Liang, Hui Zeng, and Lei Zhang. Details or artifacts: A locally discriminative learning approach to realistic image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5657–5666, 2022. 2, 3, 7

    2022

  22. [30]

    Efficient and degradation-adaptive network for real-world image super-resolution

    Jie Liang, Hui Zeng, and Lei Zhang. Efficient and degradation-adaptive network for real-world image super-resolution. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 574–591. Springer, 2022. 7

    2022

  23. [31]

    Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution

    Bee Lim, Sanghyun Son, Heewon Kim, Seungjun Nah, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 136–144, 2017. 3

    2017

  24. [32]

    Diffbir: Toward blind image restoration with generative diffusion prior

    Xinqi Lin, Jingwen He, Ziyan Chen, Zhaoyang Lyu, Bo Dai, Fanghua Yu, Yu Qiao, Wanli Ouyang, and Chao Dong. Diffbir: Toward blind image restoration with generative diffusion prior. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 430–448. Springer, 2024. 3, 7

    2024

  25. [33]

    The power of context: How multimodality improves image super-resolution

    Kangfu Mei, Hossein Talebi, Mojtaba Ardakani, Vishal M Patel, Peyman Milanfar, and Mauricio Del- bracio. The power of context: How multimodality improves image super-resolution. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14503, 2025. 2, 3, 7 11

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Flickr30k entities: Collecting region-to-phrase correspondences for richer image-to-sentence models

    Bryan A Plummer, Liwei Wang, Chris M Cervantes, Juan C Caicedo, Julia Hockenmaier, and Svetlana Lazebnik. Flickr30k entities: Collecting region-to-phrase correspondences for richer image-to-sentence models. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision...

    2015

  27. [35]

    Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis

    Dustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Jonas Müller, Joe Penna, and Robin Rombach. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Xpsr: Cross-modal priors for diffusion-based image super-resolution

    Yunpeng Qu, Kun Yuan, Kai Zhao, Qizhi Xie, Jinhua Hao, Ming Sun, and Chao Zhou. Xpsr: Cross-modal priors for diffusion-based image super-resolution. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 285–303. Springer, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  29. [37]

    You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection

    Joseph Redmon, Santosh Divvala, Ross Girshick, and Ali Farhadi. You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 779–788, 2016. 3

    2016

  30. [38]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2

    2022

  31. [39]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Björn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 3, 6, 7

    2022

  32. [40]

    Fashion customization: Image generation based on editing clue

    Dan Song, Jian-Hao Zeng, Min Liu, Xuan-Ya Li, and An-An Liu. Fashion customization: Image generation based on editing clue. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 34(6):4434–4444,

  33. [41]

    Exploring clip for assessing the look and feel of images

    Jianyi Wang, Kelvin CK Chan, and Chen Change Loy. Exploring clip for assessing the look and feel of images. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 37, pages 2555–2563,

  34. [42]

    Exploit- ing diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution

    Jianyi Wang, Zongsheng Yue, Shangchen Zhou, Kelvin CK Chan, and Chen Change Loy. Exploit- ing diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution. International Journal of Computer Vision , 132(12):5929–5949, 2024. 3, 7

    2024

  35. [43]

    Real-esrgan: Training real-world blind super- resolution with pure synthetic data

    Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Chao Dong, and Ying Shan. Real-esrgan: Training real-world blind super- resolution with pure synthetic data. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 1905–1914, 2021. 2, 3, 6, 7

    1905

  36. [44]

    Esrgan: Enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks

    Xintao Wang, Ke Yu, Shixiang Wu, Jinjin Gu, Yihao Liu, Chao Dong, Yu Qiao, and Chen Change Loy. Esrgan: Enhanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) workshops, pages 0–0, 2018. 2

    2018

  37. [45]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004. 2, 6

    2004

  38. [46]

    Component divide-and-conquer for real-world image super-resolution

    Pengxu Wei, Ziwei Xie, Hannan Lu, Zongyuan Zhan, Qixiang Ye, Wangmeng Zuo, and Liang Lin. Component divide-and-conquer for real-world image super-resolution. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part VIII 16, pag...

    2020

  39. [47]

    Seesr: Towards semantics-aware real-world image super-resolution

    Rongyuan Wu, Tao Yang, Lingchen Sun, Zhengqiang Zhang, Shuai Li, and Lei Zhang. Seesr: Towards semantics-aware real-world image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 25456–25467, 2024. 2, 3, 4, 6, 7

    2024

  40. [48]

    Desra: detect and delete the artifacts of gan-based real-world super-resolution models

    Liangbin Xie, Xintao Wang, Xiangyu Chen, Gen Li, Ying Shan, Jiantao Zhou, and Chao Dong. Desra: detect and delete the artifacts of gan-based real-world super-resolution models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02457, 2023. 2, 3

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Scalar: Scale-wise controllable visual autoregressive learning

    Ryan Xu, Dongyang Jin, Yancheng Bai, Rui Lan, Xu Duan, Lei Sun, and Xiangxiang Chu. Scalar: Scale-wise controllable visual autoregressive learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.19946, 2025. 2

    2025

  42. [50]

    Maniqa: Multi-dimension attention network for no-reference image quality assessment

    Sidi Yang, Tianhe Wu, Shuwei Shi, Shanshan Lao, Yuan Gong, Mingdeng Cao, Jiahao Wang, and Yujiu Yang. Maniqa: Multi-dimension attention network for no-reference image quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, page...

  43. [51]

    Pixel-aware stable diffusion for realistic image super-resolution and personalized stylization

    Tao Yang, Rongyuan Wu, Peiran Ren, Xuansong Xie, and Lei Zhang. Pixel-aware stable diffusion for realistic image super-resolution and personalized stylization. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 74–91. Springer, 2024. 2, 3, 7

    2024

  44. [52]

    Scaling up to excellence: Practicing model scaling for photo-realistic image restoration in the wild

    Fanghua Yu, Jinjin Gu, Zheyuan Li, Jinfan Hu, Xiangtao Kong, Xintao Wang, Jingwen He, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Scaling up to excellence: Practicing model scaling for photo-realistic image restoration in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and ...

    2024

  45. [53]

    Resshift: Efficient diffusion model for image super- resolution by residual shifting

    Zongsheng Yue, Jianyi Wang, and Chen Change Loy. Resshift: Efficient diffusion model for image super- resolution by residual shifting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:13294–13307,

  46. [54]

    Cat-dm: Con- trollable accelerated virtual try-on with diffusion model

    Jianhao Zeng, Dan Song, Weizhi Nie, Hongshuo Tian, Tongtong Wang, and An-An Liu. Cat-dm: Con- trollable accelerated virtual try-on with diffusion model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8372–8382, 2024. 2

    2024

  47. [55]

    Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution

    Kai Zhang, Jingyun Liang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 4791–4800, 2021. 2, 3, 7

    2021

  48. [56]

    A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator

    Lin Zhang, Lei Zhang, and Alan C Bovik. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 24(8):2579–2591, 2015. 6

    2015

  49. [57]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847,

  50. [58]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shechtman, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 586–595, 2018. 6

    2018

  51. [59]

    Efficient long-range attention network for image super-resolution

    Xindong Zhang, Hui Zeng, Shi Guo, and Lei Zhang. Efficient long-range attention network for image super-resolution. In European conference on computer vision, pages 649–667. Springer, 2022. 3

    2022

  52. [60]

    Recognize anything: A strong image tagging model

    Youcai Zhang, Xinyu Huang, Jinyu Ma, Zhaoyang Li, Zhaochuan Luo, Yanchun Xie, Yuzhuo Qin, Tong Luo, Yaqian Li, Shilong Liu, et al. Recognize anything: A strong image tagging model. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1724...

    2024

  53. [61]

    Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks

    Yulun Zhang, Kunpeng Li, Kai Li, Lichen Wang, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 286–301, 2018. 3

    2018

  54. [62]

    Please generate a very short description for the image

    Yulun Zhang, Yapeng Tian, Yu Kong, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Residual dense network for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2472–2481, 2018. 3 13 A Appendix A.1 Additional Experiments We evaluate the p...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.