Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 202 references

Extreme Lithium Depletion in Solar Twins: Challenging Non-Standard Mixing Models

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper reports six new solar twins with A(Li) below about 0.5 dex at ages below about 5 Gyr, and argues that early episodic accretion is the most likely explanation.

desk verdict Careful new data, but five of the six new 'solar twins' fall outside the paper's own Teff criterion, so the claimed challenge to mixing models is not yet established. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16513 v1 pith:YZVXESXU submitted 2025-08-22 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EP

classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EP
keywords lithiumdepletionsolartwinsepisodicaccretionbluestragglerstarsstellarabundancesmixingplanetengulfmentberyllium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Six newly found solar twins have almost no lithium left in their atmospheres (A(Li) ≲ 0.5 dex) even though they are only 3–5 Gyr old, far younger than the age at which standard and current non-standard mixing models would remove lithium from Sun-like stars. The paper argues these stars, together with one previously reported anomalous twin, form a distinct population: about 5% of the 150 solar twins surveyed show this extreme depletion. After simulating planet engulfment, inspecting radial velocities for hidden companions, and weighing blue straggler scenarios, the authors conclude that early episodic accretion—violent bursts of mass falling onto the star during its first few million years—is the most likely cause. The reason this matters is that lithium-poor solar twins could become an observable fingerprint of a rare, violent accretion history that leaves no other trace in an otherwise ordinary Sun-like star.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing comparison is an incidence ratio: in the episodic-accretion grid, two of sixty models (about 3%) show strong lithium depletion by a few Myr, and seven of the roughly 150 solar twins in the parent sample (about 5%) show A(Li) below ~0.5 dex. The second tracer is beryllium: lithium burns near 2.5 million K while beryllium survives to about 3.5 million K, so the episodic-accretion models predict strong Li loss with Be intact, matching the two stars with measured Be. Lithium itself is measured by spectral synthesis of the 6707.8 Å Li I feature with 3D non-LTE corrections; ages come from isochrones and are cross-checked with chemical-clock and activity relations. The planet-engul

What would settle it

Measure beryllium in the remaining five low-Li stars (HIP 53087, HIP 91700, HD 221103, HD 236254, HIP 8522). Episodic accretion predicts A(Be) near 0.85–0.99 dex, following the solar-twin trend; a clear beryllium depletion in any of these stars would falsify the episodic-accretion explanation for that star and push it toward a merger or mass-transfer origin.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors identify six previously unknown solar twins—stars with Sun-like temperature, gravity, and metallicity—whose lithium abundance A(Li) is at or below roughly 0.5 dex at ages between roughly 3 and 5 Gyr. Standard stellar models predict these stars should still hold near-primordial lithium, around 3 dex, and known non-standard mixing models do not remove enough lithium this early. Together with the previously reported anomalous twin HIP 8522, the six make seven such objects in a parent sample of 150 solar twins. After ruling out unresolved stellar companions via spectral energy distributions and radial velocities, the authors test three depletion channels. Planet engulfment simulation

Load-bearing premise

The episodic-accretion conclusion assumes the 150-star survey is an unbiased census of solar twins and that the small grid of episodic-accretion models, with only two strongly depleted cases (one below the solar-twin mass range), can be compared directly as a predicted ~3% incidence; if either assumption fails, the quantitative support for episodic accretion over mergers loses its footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Current non-standard mixing models that act only after the zero-age main sequence cannot account for A(Li) below 0.5 dex in stars younger than 5 Gyr; the low-Li twins require a pre-main-sequence depletion episode.
  • If episodic accretion is the mechanism, the remaining unmeasured twins should have normal beryllium, matching the two stars measured; a Be-depleted outlier would point back to a merger or mass-transfer origin.
  • The match between the model-predicted ~3% and observed ~5% incidence means strongly Li-depleting episodic accretion is rare but not exotic, occurring in a few percent of solar-mass stars.
  • The radial-velocity campaign rules out stellar companions and instead finds planetary-mass companions around two low-Li stars, so these systems retain planets despite the history that destroyed their lithium.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step would be to compare the full predicted lithium-abundance distribution from the episodic-accretion models against the survey, rather than only the strong-depletion tail; the paper's incidence match uses two small counts (2/60 models vs 7/150 stars).
  • The same lithium–beryllium diagnostic could be applied to lithium-depleted halo and thick-disk stars below the Spite plateau; any with intact Be would suggest episodic accretion operates beyond solar twins and is not limited to blue-straggler formation.
  • Because the two strongly depleted models in the grid include a 0.735-solar-mass case below the solar-twin mass range, extending the grid to 0.9–1.1 solar masses at solar metallicity would directly test whether the predicted ~3% incidence holds for the stars actually being compared.
  • If confirmed, these stars would transform lithium measurements into a field-star census of protostellar episodic accretion, complementing the luminosity-based statistics from embedded young stellar objects.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports six newly identified low-Li stars from the Inti solar-twin survey, plus the previously known HIP 8522, giving a total of seven extremely Li-poor objects. Using high-resolution spectra from HARPS, HDS, TS23, and MIKE, the authors derive stellar parameters, ages, masses, chemical abundances, and 3D NLTE Li abundances. They then test three Li-depletion scenarios: planet engulfment with MESA simulations, blue-straggler formation via radial-velocity/SED companion searches and chemical-clock age discrepancies, and early episodic accretion using the Baraffe et al. (2017a) model grid. They conclude that early episodic accretion is the most likely explanation, with HIP 91700 possibly explained by planet engulfment, and report two new exoplanet candidates around HIP 53087 and HIP 93858.

Significance. If the Li anomalies are genuine, this is a valuable sample that challenges standard and non-standard Li-depletion models for Sun-like stars and provides a population-level test of episodic accretion. The observational analysis is careful: differential abundance analysis relative to the Sun, NLTE corrections, independent checks of stellar parameters, a thorough SED/RV companion search, and falsifiable Be predictions for the remaining stars. However, the interpretation currently rests on several load-bearing assumptions that are not fully supported: most targets do not satisfy the paper's own solar-twin definition, the incidence comparison with episodic-accretion models lacks statistical weight, and the Be discriminator is available for only two of seven stars. The significance of the paper is therefore conditional on a reanalysis that establishes the anomaly at the individual stellar parameters.

major comments (3)
  1. [§1 (footnote 18), Table 2, §6/Fig. 3] The six newly reported stars do not satisfy the paper's own solar-twin Teff criterion (5777±100 K): HIP 53087 (5633 K), HIP 91700 (5533 K), HIP 93858 (5671 K), HIP 116937 (5659 K), HD 221103 (5884 K), and HD 236254 (5632 K). Only HIP 8522 (5729 K) lies inside the window. Because PMS Li depletion is strongly mass- and Teff-dependent, the Fig. 3 comparison against the Inti solar-twin Li-age relation is not an adequate null model: a 0.93 M_sun star at 5533 K is expected to burn more Li during the PMS than a 1.0 M_sun twin. The central claim of an unexplained anomaly requires computing standard-model Li expectations at the individual masses and effective temperatures, or at least for the most deviant cases. Without this, the statement that these stars challenge non-standard mixing models is not demonstrated for the six new objects.
  2. [§8.3, §9] The inference that 7/150 ≈ 5% is consistent with the episodic-accretion prediction of 2/60 ≈ 3% has no statistical support. A binomial 95% confidence interval for 7/150 is roughly [1.3%, 8.0%] (or similar width), so the 3% prediction is not meaningfully distinguished from a much wider range of rates. Moreover, one of the two Baraffe et al. (2017a) models with strong Li depletion has a final mass of 0.735 M_sun (Table A2 here), below the inferred mass range of this sample (0.93–1.08 M_sun, Table 2); the only in-range model (0.926 M_sun) yields partial depletion. The paper should quote the effective predicted rate for solar-mass models and give a proper uncertainty interval for the observed 7/150 fraction before using this as quantitative support.
  3. [§8.3, Fig. 8, Table A2, §9] The Be test is the main discriminator offered in favor of episodic accretion over FBSS/merger scenarios, but it is based on only two of the seven stars (HIP 116937 and HIP 93858), and the model extension in Table A2 predicts essentially no Be depletion for the two matched cases (Be/Be0 = 0.85–0.99). With n = 2 and five stars unmeasured, the Be data are at most a consistency check, not a confirmation. The conclusion that episodic accretion is 'the most likely scenario' therefore goes beyond the evidence currently presented. I recommend either rephrasing the conclusion as provisional pending Be measurements for the remaining stars, or substantially strengthening the quantitative model-vs-observation comparison.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Summary, §7.2, Table 5] The second exoplanet is called HIP 116937 b in the Summary but HIP 93858 b in Table 5 and in §7.2. Please correct this inconsistency and ensure the period/mass assignments match throughout.
  2. [§9 and Fig. 8 caption] The labels 'HD 10725' and 'HIP 38909' should be 'HIP 10725' and 'HIP 38908'.
  3. [Table 7 vs §8.1/Table 6] HD 221103 is listed as 'No refractory enrichment' in Table 7, but §8.1 and Table 6 report a significant positive TC slope (10.77 ± 2.46 × 10^-5 dex/K, p = 0.010). This internal contradiction should be reconciled.
  4. [§8.1, Fig. 7] The MESA engulfment masses (30, 265, 1000 M_Earth) are fit parameters tuned to reproduce the observed A(Li) and A(Fe). The text should state explicitly that these simulations are illustrative rather than predictive; the current wording in places implies the engulfment scenario is constrained by the data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Li abundances are measured independently, the model comparisons are based on prior published simulations, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim rests on independent spectroscopic measurements of A(Li), stellar parameters, and isochronal ages/masses. The Li abundances are obtained from spectral synthesis and are not used as inputs to the age or mass determinations, so the comparison of these stars to the Inti solar-twin A(Li)-age distribution is not forced by construction. The episodic accretion conclusion relies on Baraffe et al. (2017a), a prior, published model grid with stated physical assumptions that does not include the present stars; the quoted ~3% is a model-grid fraction and the Be extension is a forward model calculation, not a fit to the measured Be abundances. The planet-engulfment MESA runs do tune engulfed masses to reproduce observed A(Li)/A(Fe), but these are scenario-reproduction tests and are not used to define the anomaly itself. Self-citations (Inti calibration, HIP 8522) are present, but they do not supply the central evidence. Potential concerns about the sample definition (e.g., some stars falling outside the adopted Teff range) are correctness or internal-consistency issues, not circular reductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central lithium anomaly needs no free parameters. Free parameters appear in the scenario tests: engulfed masses are fitted to abundances, and the age calibrations are empirical. No new theoretical entities are introduced; the two planet candidates are observational interpretations.

free parameters (6)
  • Engulfed planet mass for HIP 91700 = ~30 M_Earth
    Chosen in MESA simulation to reproduce both observed A(Li) and A(Fe); not predicted independently.
  • Engulfed planet mass for HD 236254 = ~265 M_Earth
    Matches A(Li) but fails A(Fe); used to judge the engulfment scenario unlikely.
  • Engulfed planet mass for HIP 38908 = >1000 M_Earth
    Required to match both A(Li) and A(Fe), deemed unrealistic.
  • Engulfed planet mass for HD 221103 = >1000 M_Earth
    Required but unrealistic, used to rule out engulfment.
  • Accretion rate for engulfment = 3e-4 M_Earth/yr
    Adopted from Sevilla et al. 2022b and applied at ZAMS.
  • Chemical clock calibration coefficients = Eqs. 1-2 slopes and intercepts
    Fit to the Inti solar twin sample and used to derive alternative ages for FBSS classification.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Kurucz ODFNEW model atmospheres and LTE MOOG synthesis are adequate for stellar parameters and lithium determination
    Used for differential analysis in Sections 3 and 6.
  • domain assumption 3D NLTE corrections from Wang et al. (2021) apply to solar twins
    Applied to all lithium abundances in Section 6.
  • domain assumption Yonsei-Yale isochrones and the q2 Bayesian method give accurate ages and masses
    Ages and masses in Section 5 and Table 2 underpin the claim that the stars are young.
  • domain assumption Baraffe et al. (2017a) cold/hybrid episodic accretion models are representative of field solar-mass star formation
    The favored scenario in Section 8.3 depends on these models.
  • domain assumption Sevilla et al. (2022b) MESA engulfment prescription with bulk Earth composition captures lithium and iron evolution after engulfment
    Used in Section 8.1.
  • domain assumption The quasi-periodic Gaussian Process kernel adequately separates stellar activity from Keplerian signals
    Used for RV planet detection in Section 7.2.
invented entities (2)
  • HIP 53087 b independent evidence
    purpose: Explains a 225 d low-amplitude Keplerian RV signal and supports the conclusion that the star has no stellar companion.
    Predicted orbit is falsifiable with future RVs or transits, but the signal is low-amplitude with K around 2.8 m/s.
  • HIP 93858 b (listed as HIP 116937 b in the Summary) independent evidence
    purpose: Explains a 766 d RV signal; the paper calls it a confirmed planet in Table 7 but gives a different name in the Summary.
    Predicted orbit is falsifiable; the naming inconsistency needs correction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Extreme Lithium Depletion in Solar Twins: Challenging Non-Standard Mixing Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YZVXESXU

@misc{pith2026250816513,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Extreme Lithium Depletion in Solar Twins: Challenging Non-Standard Mixing Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YZVXESXU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16513}
}
abstract

Lithium (Li) is a powerful tracer of stellar mixing, gradually depleted in solar twins by non-standard transport below the convective zone. Here, we identify six new solar twins with exceptionally low Li levels that are not explained by current non-standard mixing models and, together with our previously reported anomalous solar twin HIP 8522, suggest a distinct population marked by a violent evolutionary past. Employing high-resolution spectra ($R=60,000 - 165,000$), we infer precise stellar parameters and chemical compositions, including Li abundances. We consider possible scenarios generating enhanced mixing, including planetary engulfment, blue straggler stars (BSSs), and early episodic accretion. Our planet engulfment simulations indicate that only one star may have engulfed an exoplanet, rapidly depleting Li via thermohaline convection. In the BSS scenario, radial velocity data rule out binary mass transfer, revealing no stellar companions but instead two new exoplanets. If these stars are field BSSs, a binary merger is likely though uncertain given that current BSS models focus mostly on stars in open clusters. Using pre-main-sequence episodic accretion models, we find that solar-mass stars can experience enhanced Li depletion without significant beryllium (Be) depletion. This is consistent with the Be abundances measured in two of our stars and represents the most plausible scenario, pending Be measurements for the remaining stars. These unique stars, together with HIP 8522, represent exceptional cases for testing stellar evolution models and probing internal mixing processes in Sun-like stars.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

202 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2023, ARA&A, 61, 329, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-103508

    Aigrain, S., & Foreman-Mackey, D. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 329, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-103508

  2. [2]

    2011, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2011, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 448, 16th Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun, ed. C. Johns-Krull, M. K. Browning, & A. A. West, 91, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1011.5405

  3. [3]

    1989, GeoCoA, 53, 197, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X Andr´ assy, R., & Spruit, H

    Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, GeoCoA, 53, 197, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X Andr´ assy, R., & Spruit, H. C. 2015, A&A, 579, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526029

  4. [4]

    1975, A&A, 42, 55

    Arnould, M., & Norgaard, H. 1975, A&A, 42, 55

  5. [5]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

  6. [6]

    A., & Hawley, J

    Balbus, S. A., & Hawley, J. F. 1998, Reviews of Modern Physics, 70, 1, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1

  7. [7]

    2010, A&A, 521, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014979

    Baraffe, I., & Chabrier, G. 2010, A&A, 521, A44, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014979

  8. [8]

    2009, ApJL, 702, L27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/L27

    Baraffe, I., Chabrier, G., & Gallardo, J. 2009, ApJL, 702, L27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/L27

Show all 202 references
  1. [9]

    G., Vorobyov, E

    Baraffe, I., Elbakyan, V. G., Vorobyov, E. I., & Chabrier, G. 2017a, A&A, 597, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629303

  2. [10]

    2017b, ApJL, 845, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa82ff Barrag´ an, O., Aigrain, S., Rajpaul, V

    Baraffe, I., Pratt, J., Goffrey, T., et al. 2017b, ApJL, 845, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa82ff Barrag´ an, O., Aigrain, S., Rajpaul, V. M., & Zicher, N. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 866, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2889 Barrag´ an, O., Gandolfi, D., & Antoniciello, G. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 1017,...

  3. [12]

    2008b, A&A, 492, 277, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810395

    Bayo, A., Rodrigo, C., Barrado Y Navascu´ es, D., et al. 2008b, A&A, 492, 277, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810395

  4. [13]

    R., Lanzoni, B., & Bellazzini, M

    Beccari, G., Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B., & Bellazzini, M. 2006, ApJL, 652, L121, doi: 10.1086/510019

  5. [14]

    Howard, A. W. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 2969, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad745

  6. [15]

    R., & Lin, D

    Bell, K. R., & Lin, D. N. C. 1994, ApJ, 427, 987, doi: 10.1086/174206

  7. [16]

    2014, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1403.5237, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1403.5237

    Benitez, N., Dupke, R., Moles, M., et al. 2014, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1403.5237, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1403.5237

  8. [17]

    Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., & Oey, M. S. 2014, A&A, 562, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322631

  9. [18]

    A., Gunnels, S

    Bernstein, R., Shectman, S. A., Gunnels, S. M., Mochnacki, S., & Athey, A. E. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4841, Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, ed. M. Iye & A. F. M. ...

  10. [19]

    2021, waqasbhatti/astrobase: astrobase v0.5.3, v0.5.3, Zenodo Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4445344

    Bhatti, W., Bouma, L., Joshua, et al. 2021, waqasbhatti/astrobase: astrobase v0.5.3, v0.5.3, Zenodo Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4445344

  11. [20]

    2017, ApJS, 230, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053

    Bianchi, L., Shiao, B., & Thilker, D. 2017, ApJS, 230, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7053

  12. [21]

    2005a, ApJS, 157, 402, doi: 10.1086/427924

    Nave, G. 2005a, ApJS, 157, 402, doi: 10.1086/427924

  13. [22]

    J., Toner, A., Hibbert, A., Webb, J., & Ivarsson, S

    Blackwell-Whitehead, R. J., Toner, A., Hibbert, A., Webb, J., & Ivarsson, S. 2005b, MNRAS, 364, 705, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09597.x

  14. [23]

    2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz549

    Blanco-Cuaresma, S. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz549

  15. [24]

    2014, A&A, 569, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423945

    Blanco-Cuaresma, S., Soubiran, C., Heiter, U., & Jofr´ e, P. 2014, A&A, 569, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423945

  16. [25]

    Boesgaard, A. M. 2007, ApJ, 667, 1196, doi: 10.1086/521075

  17. [26]

    Boesgaard, A. M. 2023, ApJ, 943, 40, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca0a4

  18. [27]

    Lambert, D. L. 1998, ApJ, 492, 727, doi: 10.1086/305059

  19. [28]

    M., Lum, M

    Boesgaard, A. M., Lum, M. G., Chontos, A., & Deliyannis, C. P. 2022, ApJ, 927, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4eef 28 Winnick et al

  20. [29]

    M., & Tripicco, M

    Boesgaard, A. M., & Tripicco, M. J. 1986, ApJL, 302, L49, doi: 10.1086/184635

  21. [30]

    1992, ApJL, 401, L31, doi: 10.1086/186663

    Bonnell, I., & Bastien, P. 1992, ApJL, 401, L31, doi: 10.1086/186663

  22. [31]

    A., & Owen, J

    Booth, R. A., & Owen, J. E. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 5079, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa578

  23. [32]

    2024, A&A, 691, A142, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451321

    Borisov, S., Prantzos, N., & Charbonnel, C. 2024, A&A, 691, A142, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451321

  24. [33]

    2015, ApJS, 216, 29, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29

    Bovy, J. 2015, ApJS, 216, 29, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29

  25. [34]

    Bruning, D. H. 1984, ApJ, 281, 830, doi: 10.1086/162162

  26. [35]

    M., Burbidge, G

    Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. 1957, Reviews of Modern Physics, 29, 547, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547

  27. [36]

    M., & Turner, M

    Burles, S., Nollett, K. M., & Turner, M. S. 1999, arXiv e-prints, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9903300

  28. [37]

    Cameron, A. G. W. 1955, ApJ, 121, 144, doi: 10.1086/145970

  29. [38]

    Cameron, A. G. W., & Fowler, W. A. 1971, ApJ, 164, 111, doi: 10.1086/150821

  30. [39]

    E., & Mel´ endez, J

    Carlos, M., Nissen, P. E., & Mel´ endez, J. 2016, A&A, 587, A100, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527478

  31. [40]

    2019, MNRAS, 485, 4052, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz681

    Carlos, M., Mel´ endez, J., Spina, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 4052, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz681

  32. [41]

    W., Latham, D

    Carney, B. W., Latham, D. W., & Laird, J. B. 2005, AJ, 129, 466, doi: 10.1086/426566

  33. [42]

    2025, ApJL, 983, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc382

    Carvalho-Silva, G., Mel´ endez, J., Rathsam, A., et al. 2025, ApJL, 983, L31, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc382

  34. [43]

    D., et al

    Casagrande, L., Lin, J., Rains, A. D., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 2684, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2304

  35. [44]

    Castelli, F., & Kurucz, R. L. 2003, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres, ed. N. Piskunov, W. W. Weiss, & D. F. Gray, A20

  36. [45]

    J., Moles, M., Crist´ obal-Hornillos, D., et al

    Cenarro, A. J., Moles, M., Crist´ obal-Hornillos, D., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A176, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833036

  37. [46]

    Chaboyer, B., Demarque, P., & Pinsonneault, M. H. 1995, ApJ, 441, 865, doi: 10.1086/175408

  38. [47]

    2005, Science, 309, 2189, doi: 10.1126/science.1116849

    Charbonnel, C., & Talon, S. 2005, Science, 309, 2189, doi: 10.1126/science.1116849

  39. [48]

    A., Sills, A., & Glebbeek, E

    Chatterjee, S., Rasio, F. A., Sills, A., & Glebbeek, E. 2013, ApJ, 777, 106, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/106

  40. [49]

    G., Christlieb, N., Qian, Y

    Cohen, J. G., Christlieb, N., Qian, Y. Z., & Wasserburg, G. J. 2003, ApJ, 588, 1082, doi: 10.1086/374269

  41. [50]

    S., & Danziger, I

    Conti, P. S., & Danziger, I. J. 1966, ApJ, 146, 383, doi: 10.1086/148902

  42. [51]

    R., & Y¨ uce, K

    Cowley, C. R., & Y¨ uce, K. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 3684, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac637

  43. [52]

    2017, AJ, 153, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5b86 da Silva, R., Porto de Mello, G

    Steinhauer, A. 2017, AJ, 153, 128, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa5b86 da Silva, R., Porto de Mello, G. F., Milone, A. C., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, A84, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118751

  44. [53]

    1984, A&A, 138, 431

    Dantona, F., & Mazzitelli, I. 1984, A&A, 138, 431

  45. [54]

    Danziger, I. J. 1967, ApJ, 150, 733, doi: 10.1086/149377 De Marco, O., Shara, M. M., Zurek, D., et al. 2005, ApJ, 632, 894, doi: 10.1086/444372

  46. [55]

    Demarque, P., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y.-C., & Yi, S. K. 2004, ApJS, 155, 667, doi: 10.1086/424966

  47. [56]

    2010, ApJ, 716, 1269, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1269 Do Nascimento, Jr., J

    Newsham, G. 2010, ApJ, 716, 1269, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1269 Do Nascimento, Jr., J. D., Castro, M., Mel´ endez, J., et al. 2009, A&A, 501, 687, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911935 dos Santos, L. A., Mel´ endez, J., do Nascimento, J.-D., et al. 2016, A&A, 592, A156, doi: 10...

  48. [57]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 3592, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1692

    Elsworth, Y. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3592, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1692

  49. [58]

    1999, A&A, 349, 236

    Epchtein, N., Deul, E., Derriere, S., et al. 1999, A&A, 349, 236

  50. [59]

    R., Johnson, J

    Epstein, C. R., Johnson, J. A., Dong, S., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 447, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/447

  51. [60]

    W., Irwin, M

    Evans, D. W., Irwin, M. J., & Helmer, L. 2002, A&A, 395, 347, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021285

  52. [61]

    M., Jørgensen, J

    Evans, Neal J., I., Dunham, M. M., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2009, ApJS, 181, 321, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321

  53. [62]

    R., Lanzoni, B., & Dalessandro, E

    Ferraro, F. R., Lanzoni, B., & Dalessandro, E. 2020, Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, 31, 19, doi: 10.1007/s12210-020-00873-2

  54. [63]

    R., Sabbi, E., Gratton, R., et al

    Ferraro, F. R., Sabbi, E., Gratton, R., et al. 2006, ApJL, 647, L53, doi: 10.1086/507327

  55. [64]

    D., Olive, K

    Fields, B. D., Olive, K. A., Yeh, T.-H., & Young, C. 2020, JCAP, 2020, 010, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/03/010

  56. [65]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 10016, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3714 Fouqu´ e, P., Chevallier, L., Cohen, M., et al

    Flores, M., Yana Galarza, J., Miquelarena, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 10016, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3714 Fouqu´ e, P., Chevallier, L., Cohen, M., et al. 2000, A&AS, 141, 313, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000123

  57. [66]

    G., & Steffen, M

    Freytag, B., Ludwig, H. G., & Steffen, M. 1996, A&A, 313, 497 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

  58. [67]

    Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. 1992, Statistical Science, 7, 457, doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136

  59. [68]

    L., Bono, G., Edmonds, P

    Gilliland, R. L., Bono, G., Edmonds, P. D., et al. 1998, ApJ, 507, 818, doi: 10.1086/306363 29

  60. [69]

    M., Brasseur, C

    Ginsburg, A., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., Brasseur, C. E., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aafc33

  61. [70]

    W., Pritchet, C

    Glaspey, J. W., Pritchet, C. J., & Stetson, P. B. 1994, AJ, 108, 271, doi: 10.1086/117067

  62. [71]

    Glebbeek, E., Gaburov, E., Portegies Zwart, S., & Pols, O. R. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 3497, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1268

  63. [72]

    L., & Richardson, R

    Greenstein, J. L., & Richardson, R. S. 1951, ApJ, 113, 536, doi: 10.1086/145424

  64. [73]

    J., Kawaler, S

    Hansen, C. J., Kawaler, S. D., & Trimble, V. 2004, Stellar interiors : physical principles, structure, and evolution

  65. [74]

    Hartmann, L., & Kenyon, S. J. 1985, ApJ, 299, 462, doi: 10.1086/163713

  66. [75]

    Hatzes, A. P. 2020, The Doppler method for the detection of exoplanets, doi: 10.1088/2514-3433/ab46a3

  67. [76]

    D., Collier Cameron, A., Queloz, D., et al

    Haywood, R. D., Collier Cameron, A., Queloz, D., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2517, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1320

  68. [77]

    Herbig, G. H. 1965, ApJ, 141, 588, doi: 10.1086/148147

  69. [78]

    1990, ApJ, 356, 359, doi: 10.1086/168845

    Hernquist, L. 1990, ApJ, 356, 359, doi: 10.1086/168845

  70. [79]

    G., & Day, C

    Hills, J. G., & Day, C. A. 1976, Astrophys. Lett., 17, 87

  71. [80]

    M., Iben, Jr., I., & Pilachowski, C

    Hobbs, L. M., Iben, Jr., I., & Pilachowski, C. 1989, ApJ, 347, 817, doi: 10.1086/168171

  72. [81]

    M., & Mathieu, R

    Hobbs, L. M., & Mathieu, R. D. 1991, PASP, 103, 431, doi: 10.1086/132837 Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al. 2000, A&A, 357, 367 H¨ uhn, L. A., & Bitsch, B. 2023, A&A, 676, A87, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346604

  73. [82]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

  74. [83]

    2010, A&A, 514, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913811

    Ishihara, D., Onaka, T., Kataza, H., et al. 2010, A&A, 514, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913811

  75. [84]

    D., Jackson, R

    Jeffries, R. D., Jackson, R. J., Sun, Q., & Deliyannis, C. P. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 1158, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3141

  76. [85]

    D., Jackson, R

    Jeffries, R. D., Jackson, R. J., Franciosini, E., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 1456, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2458 Jos´ e, J., & Hernanz, M. 1998, ApJ, 494, 680, doi: 10.1086/305244

  77. [86]

    Kelson, D. D. 2003, PASP, 115, 688, doi: 10.1086/375502

  78. [87]

    2000, ApJ, 531, 159, doi: 10.1086/308445

    Franx, M. 2000, ApJ, 531, 159, doi: 10.1086/308445

  79. [88]

    D., Williams, R

    Kelson, D. D., Williams, R. J., Dressler, A., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, 110, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/110

  80. [89]

    J., Gomez, M., Marzke, R

    Kenyon, S. J., Gomez, M., Marzke, R. O., & Hartmann, L. 1994, AJ, 108, 251, doi: 10.1086/117064

  81. [90]

    J., & Hartmann, L

    Kenyon, S. J., & Hartmann, L. 1995, ApJS, 101, 117, doi: 10.1086/192235

  82. [91]

    J., Hartmann, L

    Kenyon, S. J., Hartmann, L. W., Strom, K. M., & Strom, S. E. 1990, AJ, 99, 869, doi: 10.1086/115380

  83. [92]

    Kharchenko, N. V. 2001, Kinematika i Fizika Nebesnykh Tel, 17, 409

  84. [93]

    Khatri, R., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2011, Astronomy Letters, 37, 367, doi: 10.1134/S1063773711060041

  85. [94]

    Z., Fuhr, J

    Klose, J. Z., Fuhr, J. R., & Wiese, W. L. 2002, Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 31, 217, doi: 10.1063/1.1448482

  86. [95]

    2010, Mem

    Koester, D. 2010, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 81, 921

  87. [96]

    E., Wood, M

    Lawler, J. E., Wood, M. P., Den Hartog, E. A., et al. 2014, ApJS, 215, 20, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/215/2/20

  88. [97]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 661, 210, doi: 10.1086/514330

    Leigh, N., Sills, A., & Knigge, C. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 661, 210, doi: 10.1086/514330

  89. [98]

    2020, MNRAS, 496, 1819, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1670

    Perna, R. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 1819, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1670

  90. [99]

    2018, ApJ, 860, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac50f

    Li, C., Zhao, G., Zhai, M., & Jia, Y. 2018, ApJ, 860, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac50f

  91. [100]

    Lin, D. N. C., & Papaloizou, J. 1985, in Protostars and Planets II, ed. D. C. Black & M. S. Matthews, 981–1072

  92. [101]

    2024, Nature, 627, 501, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07091-y

    Liu, F., Ting, Y.-S., Yong, D., et al. 2024, Nature, 627, 501, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07091-y

  93. [102]

    Lodato, G., & Rice, W. K. M. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 630, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07811.x

  94. [103]

    2003, ApJ, 591, 1220, doi: 10.1086/375492

    Lodders, K. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220, doi: 10.1086/375492

  95. [104]

    S., Rasio, F

    Lombardi, James C., J., Warren, J. S., Rasio, F. A., Sills, A., & Warren, A. R. 2002, ApJ, 568, 939, doi: 10.1086/339060

  96. [105]

    Lorenzo-Oliveira, D., Mel´ endez, J., Ponte, G., & Galarza, J. Y. 2020, MNRAS, 495, L61, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa057

  97. [106]

    C., Mel´ endez, J., et al

    Lorenzo-Oliveira, D., Freitas, F. C., Mel´ endez, J., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629294

  98. [107]

    R., et al

    Lovisi, L., Mucciarelli, A., Ferraro, F. R., et al. 2010, ApJL, 719, L121, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/L121

  99. [108]

    R., Schiavon, R

    Majewski, S. R., Schiavon, R. P., Frinchaboy, P. M., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa784d

  100. [109]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 3217, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1177

    Martos, G., Mel´ endez, J., Rathsam, A., & Carvalho Silva, G. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 3217, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1177

  101. [110]

    2003, The Messenger, 114, 20

    Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., et al. 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20

  102. [111]

    McCrea, W. H. 1964, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 128, 147, doi: 10.1093/mnras/128.2.147

  103. [112]

    McDonough, W., & s. Sun, S. 1995, Chemical Geology, 120, 223, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(94)00140-4

  104. [113]

    2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed

    McKinney, W. 2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed. S. van der Walt & J. Millman, 51 – 56

  105. [114]

    1998, AJ, 115, 1640, doi: 10.1086/300289 30 Winnick et al

    McWilliam, A. 1998, AJ, 115, 1640, doi: 10.1086/300289 30 Winnick et al. Mel´ endez, J., Asplund, M., Gustafsson, B., & Yong, D. 2009, ApJL, 704, L66, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/L66 Mel´ endez, J., Dodds-Eden, K., & Robles, J. A. 2006, ApJL, 641, L133, doi: 10.1086/503898 Me...

  106. [115]

    1971, A&A, 15, 337

    Meneguzzi, M., Audouze, J., & Reeves, H. 1971, A&A, 15, 337

  107. [116]

    Merchant, A. E. 1966, ApJ, 143, 336, doi: 10.1086/148516

  108. [117]

    2004, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Michaud, G. 2004, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 224, The A-Star Puzzle, ed. J. Zverko, J. Ziznovsky, S. J. Adelman, & W. W. Weiss, 173–183, doi: 10.1017/S1743921304004533

  109. [118]

    E., Mathieu, R

    Milliman, K. E., Mathieu, R. D., & Schuler, S. C. 2015, AJ, 150, 84, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/84

  110. [119]

    1975, PASJ, 27, 533

    Miyamoto, M., & Nagai, R. 1975, PASJ, 27, 533

  111. [120]

    R., Mel´ endez, J., Ram ´ ırez, I., et al

    Monroe, T. R., Mel´ endez, J., Ram ´ ırez, I., et al. 2013, ApJL, 774, L32, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/774/2/L32

  112. [121]

    2007, PASJ, 59, S369, doi: 10.1093/pasj/59.sp2.S369

    Murakami, H., Baba, H., Barthel, P., et al. 2007, PASJ, 59, S369, doi: 10.1093/pasj/59.sp2.S369

  113. [122]

    F., Frenk, C

    Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. 1996, ApJ, 462, 563, doi: 10.1086/177173

  114. [123]

    2021, AJ, 162, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac1bb5

    Netto, Y., Lorenzo-Oliveira, D., Mel´ endez, J., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 160, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac1bb5

  115. [124]

    C., Mathieu, R

    Nine, A. C., Mathieu, R. D., Schuler, S. C., & Milliman, K. E. 2024, ApJ, 970, 187, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad534b

  116. [125]

    Nissen, P. E. 2015, A&A, 579, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526269

  117. [126]

    E., Silva Aguirre, V., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., et al

    Nissen, P. E., Silva Aguirre, V., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731845

  118. [127]

    2002, PASJ, 54, 855, doi: 10.1093/pasj/54.6.855

    Noguchi, K., Aoki, W., Kawanomoto, S., et al. 2002, PASJ, 54, 855, doi: 10.1093/pasj/54.6.855

  119. [128]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 23, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000169

    Ochsenbein, F., Bauer, P., & Marcout, J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 23, doi: 10.1051/aas:2000169

  120. [129]

    Offner, S. S. R., Klein, R. I., & McKee, C. F. 2008, ApJ, 686, 1174, doi: 10.1086/590238

  121. [130]

    2015, A&A, 580, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526413

    Paunzen, E. 2015, A&A, 580, A23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526413

  122. [131]

    2011, ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

  123. [132]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

  124. [133]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

  125. [134]

    B., et al

    Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8

  126. [135]

    2019, ApJS, 243, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    Paxton, B., Smolec, R., Schwab, J., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

  127. [136]

    Perets, H. B. 2015, in Astrophysics and Space Science

  128. [138]

    B., & Fabrycky, D

    Perets, H. B., & Fabrycky, D. C. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1048, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1048

  129. [139]

    2008, A&A, 487, L45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810223

    Pfalzner, S., Tackenberg, J., & Steinhausen, M. 2008, A&A, 487, L45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810223

  130. [140]

    1989, ApJ, 338, 424, doi: 10.1086/167210 Portegies Zwart, S., & Leigh, N

    Demarque, P. 1989, ApJ, 338, 424, doi: 10.1086/167210 Portegies Zwart, S., & Leigh, N. W. C. 2019, ApJL, 876, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1b75

  131. [141]

    Preston, G. W. 1994, AJ, 108, 2267, doi: 10.1086/117239

  132. [142]

    Preston, G. W. 2015, in Astrophysics and Space Science

  133. [143]

    413, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ed

    Library, Vol. 413, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ed. H. M. J. Boffin, G. Carraro, & G. Beccari, 65, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44434-4 4

  134. [144]

    W., & Sneden, C

    Preston, G. W., & Sneden, C. 2000, AJ, 120, 1014, doi: 10.1086/301472

  135. [145]

    2020, adrn/gala: v1.3, v1.3 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4159870

    Price-Whelan, A., Sip˝ ocz, B., Lenz, D., et al. 2020, adrn/gala: v1.3, v1.3 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4159870

  136. [146]

    Price-Whelan, A. M. 2017, The Journal of Open Source Software, 2, doi: 10.21105/joss.00388

  137. [147]

    Pringle, J. E. 1981, ARA&A, 19, 137, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.19.090181.001033

  138. [148]

    J., & Glaspey, J

    Pritchet, C. J., & Glaspey, J. W. 1991, ApJ, 373, 105, doi: 10.1086/170029

  139. [149]

    X., & McWilliam, A

    Prochaska, J. X., & McWilliam, A. 2000, ApJL, 537, L57, doi: 10.1086/312749

  140. [150]

    McWilliam, A., & Wolfe, A. M. 2000, AJ, 120, 2513, doi: 10.1086/316818

  141. [151]

    2015, MNRAS, 452, 2269, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1428 Ram ´ ırez, I., Allende Prieto, C., & Lambert, D

    Roberts, S. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2269, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1428 Ram ´ ırez, I., Allende Prieto, C., & Lambert, D. L. 2007, A&A, 465, 271, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066619 Ram ´ ırez, I., Asplund, M., Baumann, P., Mel´ endez, J., &

  142. [152]

    2010, A&A, 521, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014456 Ram ´ ırez, I., Mel´ endez, J., Bean, J., et al

    Bensby, T. 2010, A&A, 521, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014456 Ram ´ ırez, I., Mel´ endez, J., Bean, J., et al. 2014, A&A, 572, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424244

  143. [153]

    2023, MNRAS, 525, 4642, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2589 31

    Rathsam, A., Mel´ endez, J., & Carvalho Silva, G. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 4642, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2589 31

  144. [154]

    Rathsam, A., Mel´ endez, J., & Karakas, A. I. 2025, A&A, 693, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451197

  145. [155]

    A., & Hoyle, F

    Reeves, H., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. 1970, Nature, 226, 727, doi: 10.1038/226727a0

  146. [156]

    2025, ApJ, 984, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc43e

    Reggiani, H., Yana Galarza, J., Lorenzo-Oliveira, D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc43e

  147. [157]

    N., & Hawley, S

    Reid, I. N., & Hawley, S. L. 2000, New light on dark stars. Red dwarfs, low-mass stars, brown dwarfs

  148. [158]

    2021, A&A, 653, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141340

    Romano, D., Magrini, L., Randich, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 653, A72, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141340

  149. [159]

    G., Kajino, T., Beers, T

    Ryan, S. G., Kajino, T., Beers, T. C., et al. 2001, ApJ, 549, 55, doi: 10.1086/319048

  150. [160]

    H., & Osten, R

    Saar, S. H., & Osten, R. A. 1997, MNRAS, 284, 803, doi: 10.1093/mnras/284.4.803

  151. [161]

    J., & Boothroyd, A

    Sackmann, I. J., & Boothroyd, A. I. 1992, ApJL, 392, L71, doi: 10.1086/186428

  152. [162]

    Sandage, A. R. 1953, AJ, 58, 61, doi: 10.1086/106822

  153. [163]

    M., Despain, K

    Scalo, J. M., Despain, K. H., & Ulrich, R. K. 1975, ApJ, 196, 805, doi: 10.1086/153471

  154. [164]

    I., et al

    Schirbel, L., Mel´ endez, J., Karakas, A. I., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A116, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527303

  155. [165]

    1999, A&A, 347, 272

    Schlattl, H., & Weiss, A. 1999, A&A, 347, 272

  156. [166]

    Schneider, F. R. N., Ohlmann, S. T., Podsiadlowski, P., et al. 2019, Nature, 574, 211, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1621-5 Sch¨ onrich, R. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 274, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21631.x Sch¨ onrich, R., Binney, J., & Dehnen, W. 2010, MNRAS, 403, 1829, doi: 10.1111/j.1...

  157. [168]

    2022b, MNRAS, 516, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2436

    Sevilla, J., Behmard, A., & Fuller, J. 2022b, MNRAS, 516, 3354, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2436

  158. [169]

    M., Saffer, R

    Shara, M. M., Saffer, R. A., & Livio, M. 1997, ApJL, 489, L59, doi: 10.1086/310952

  159. [170]

    A., & Johns, M

    Shectman, S. A., & Johns, M. 2003, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 4837, Large Ground-based Telescopes, ed. J. M. Oschmann & L. M. Stepp, 910–918, doi: 10.1117/12.457909

  160. [171]

    2024, A&A, 690, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449669

    Shejeelammal, J., Mel´ endez, J., Rathsam, A., & Martos, G. 2024, A&A, 690, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449669

  161. [172]

    H., Adams, F

    Shu, F. H., Adams, F. C., & Lizano, S. 1987, ARA&A, 25, 23, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.25.090187.000323

  162. [173]

    2010, MNRAS, 407, 277, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16876.x

    Sills, A., & Glebbeek, E. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 277, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16876.x

  163. [174]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

  164. [175]

    1972, ApJ, 171, 565, doi: 10.1086/151310

    Skumanich, A. 1972, ApJ, 171, 565, doi: 10.1086/151310

  165. [176]

    V., & Lambert, D

    Smith, V. V., & Lambert, D. L. 1989, ApJL, 345, L75, doi: 10.1086/185556

  166. [177]

    V., & Lambert, D

    Smith, V. V., & Lambert, D. L. 1990, ApJL, 361, L69, doi: 10.1086/185829

  167. [178]

    W., & Cowan, J

    Sneden, C., Preston, G. W., & Cowan, J. J. 2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 592, 504, doi: 10.1086/375705

  168. [179]

    Sneden, C. A. 1973, PhD thesis, THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN

  169. [180]

    I., et al

    Spina, L., Mel´ endez, J., Karakas, A. I., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 2580, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2938

  170. [181]

    1982, Nature, 297, 483, doi: 10.1038/297483a0

    Spite, M., & Spite, F. 1982, Nature, 297, 483, doi: 10.1038/297483a0

  171. [182]

    W., Sparks, W

    Starrfield, S., Truran, J. W., Sparks, W. M., & Arnould, M. 1978, ApJ, 222, 600, doi: 10.1086/156175

  172. [183]

    2007, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 57, 463, doi: 10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140437

    Steigman, G. 2007, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 57, 463, doi: 10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140437

  173. [184]

    Tassis, K., & Mouschovias, T. C. 2005, ApJ, 618, 783, doi: 10.1086/424480

  174. [185]

    P., & Vogelaar, M

    Terlouw, J. P., & Vogelaar, M. G. R. 2015, Kapteyn Package, version 2.3, Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Groningen Th´ eado, S., & Vauclair, S. 2012a, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi, 22, 221 Th´ eado, S., & Vauclair, S. 2012b, ApJ, 744, 123, doi: 10.108...

  175. [186]

    1986, in Proc

    Tody, D. 1986, in Proc. SPIE, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford, 733, doi: 10.1117/12.968154 Tucci Maia, M., Mel´ endez, J., Castro, M., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, L10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425357

  176. [187]

    G., MacQueen, P

    Tull, R. G., MacQueen, P. J., Sneden, C., & Lambert, D. L. 1995, PASP, 107, 251, doi: 10.1086/133548 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., & Varoquaux, G. 2011, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 22, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37

  177. [188]

    I., Baraffe, I., Harries, T., & Chabrier, G

    Vorobyov, E. I., Baraffe, I., Harries, T., & Chabrier, G. 2013, A&A, 557, A35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321775

  178. [189]

    I., & Basu, S

    Vorobyov, E. I., & Basu, S. 2005, ApJL, 633, L137, doi: 10.1086/498303

  179. [190]

    I., & Basu, S

    Vorobyov, E. I., & Basu, S. 2006, ApJ, 650, 956, doi: 10.1086/507320

  180. [191]

    I., & Basu, S

    Vorobyov, E. I., & Basu, S. 2010, ApJ, 719, 1896, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1896

  181. [192]

    V., Fowler, W

    Wagoner, R. V., Fowler, W. A., & Hoyle, F. 1967, ApJ, 148, 3, doi: 10.1086/149126 32 Winnick et al

  182. [193]

    Wallerstein, G., & Conti, P. S. 1969, ARA&A, 7, 99, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.07.090169.000531

  183. [194]

    H., & Conti, P

    Wallerstein, G., Herbig, G. H., & Conti, P. S. 1965, ApJ, 141, 610, doi: 10.1086/148148

  184. [195]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.10314, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.10314

    Wang, C., & Ryu, T. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.10314, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.10314

  185. [196]

    X., Nordlander, T., Asplund, M., et al

    Wang, E. X., Nordlander, T., Asplund, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 2159, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3381

  186. [197]

    W., Roellig, T

    Werner, M. W., Roellig, T. L., Low, F. J., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 1, doi: 10.1086/422992

  187. [198]

    Haxton, W. C. 1990, ApJ, 356, 272, doi: 10.1086/168839

  188. [199]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

  189. [201]

    2007b, ChA&A, 31, 244, doi: 10.1016/j.chinastron.2007.06.010 Yana Galarza, J., L´ opez-Valdivia, R., Mel´ endez, J., &

    Xiong, D.-r., & Deng, L.-c. 2007b, ChA&A, 31, 244, doi: 10.1016/j.chinastron.2007.06.010 Yana Galarza, J., L´ opez-Valdivia, R., Mel´ endez, J., &

  190. [202]

    2021a, ApJ, 922, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2362 Yana Galarza, J., Mel´ endez, J., Karakas, A

    Lorenzo-Oliveira, D. 2021a, ApJ, 922, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2362 Yana Galarza, J., Mel´ endez, J., Karakas, A. I., Asplund, M., & Lorenzo-Oliveira, D. 2021b, MNRAS, 502, L104, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slab010 Yana Galarza, J., Mel´ endez, J., Ram ´ ırez, I., et al. 2016a, A...

  191. [203]

    2001, ApJS, 136, 417, doi: 10.1086/321795

    Yi, S., Demarque, P., Kim, Y.-C., et al. 2001, ApJS, 136, 417, doi: 10.1086/321795

  192. [204]

    Zappala, R. R. 1972, ApJ, 172, 57, doi: 10.1086/151328

  193. [205]

    2009, ApJ, 694, 1045, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1045

    Zhu, Z., Hartmann, L., & Gammie, C. 2009, ApJ, 694, 1045, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1045

  194. [206]

    1976, ApJ, 209, 734, doi: 10.1086/154772

    Zinn, R., & Searle, L. 1976, ApJ, 209, 734, doi: 10.1086/154772

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.