Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models

As of 18 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 53 of 53 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2508.16757.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2508.16757 v1

Coverage vector

measured 53 of 53 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.418227Z

measured 54 of 54 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00

measured 1 of 1 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-02T20:27:45.962398Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

53 of 53 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact3
  • verified fuzzy1
  • unresolved49
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation bfa1163e-f440-481a-8aed-1c3d324bc3c3 · outbound

This paper cites RankArena: A Unified Platform for Evaluating Retrieval, Reranking and RAG with Human and LLM Feedback.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models RankArena: A Unified Platform for Evaluating Retrieval, Reranking and RAG with Human and LLM Feedback

Reference 1

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.986360Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.214253Z digest=sha256:6a6a6e46cd2747e50a6e72744547e92e800ce6c897da0f91faac732bef02b8bb

Observation 23bd47cb-e809-4cfb-8e98-82f7510790ba · outbound

This paper cites Generator-Retriever-Generator Approach for Open-Domain Question Answering.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Generator-Retriever-Generator Approach for Open-Domain Question Answering

Reference 2

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.218967Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.218967Z digest=sha256:98a1dfc048f2d6486201afc431aca884bab3489ea6da4bc67e229be66859cd99

Observation 0091b7ee-df6a-4a8b-87b6-025d1e210d23 · outbound

This paper cites Abdelgwad, and Adam Jatowt.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Abdelgwad, and Adam Jatowt

Reference 3

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.216329Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.223773Z digest=sha256:bc670dc7d4dedc5b23fb77f20f4c59e73f3d21149af549e1cc08599c6a6f52c4

Observation 54aa36f5-8d2d-431a-a00d-d2f89cff084f · outbound

This paper cites ASRank: Zero-Shot Re-Ranking with Answer Scent for Document Retrieval.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models ASRank: Zero-Shot Re-Ranking with Answer Scent for Document Retrieval

Reference 4

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.949456Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.227865Z digest=sha256:77f29be26138a3f84be49cc96ecab8a1c5b708ff5cf119ab79699e8320c733a5

Observation 7213cb4a-6e40-4fba-8859-f7306b185329 · outbound

This paper cites Rankify: A Comprehensive Python Toolkit for Retrieval, Re-Ranking, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Rankify: A Comprehensive Python Toolkit for Retrieval, Re-Ranking, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Reference 5

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.232104Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.232104Z digest=sha256:f8e9c2c4439038b417dd8e41cb4e3030465e6a008811449a2bc6349554baa839

Observation 8089e7b7-b184-4a6b-80d2-2e29719e774c · outbound

This paper cites TempRetriever: Fusion-based Temporal Dense Passage Retrieval for Time-Sensitive Questions.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models TempRetriever: Fusion-based Temporal Dense Passage Retrieval for Time-Sensitive Questions

Reference 6

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.236419Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.236419Z digest=sha256:dd9e40eac8cf62a4a546916e638dcf4296176be552341ad53c5ebba3c4ac3b5c

Observation 2ac80b61-252d-4050-b95f-b1f671da9f70 · outbound

This paper cites GPT-4 Technical Report.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models GPT-4 Technical Report

Reference 7

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.240952Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.240952Z digest=sha256:50fa6a072d628ed9a042a9a87a2e4427c37f721d228fd284ad9e9644065562a4

Observation 31aa87bd-e47b-4849-bbc4-81f1d4323bb4 · outbound

This paper cites InPars: Data Augmentation for Information Retrieval using Large Language Models.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models InPars: Data Augmentation for Information Retrieval using Large Language Models

Reference 8

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.244567Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.244567Z digest=sha256:65317344bcc069dd8dd760d33a71f66e169484e1d8b7b6d8f0c70e8cbbbc6487

Observation 9e01a550-a841-47aa-89f4-01b7870c4aa3 · outbound

This paper cites Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questions.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questions

Reference 9

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.248431Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.248431Z digest=sha256:ffde464e5d3e1b6a21ef7cc15a2928bdbe3edd8c0dbd4c65db38fde09502be9d

Observation 05841dfe-128f-40fb-8cb4-7837ea77ed7c · outbound

This paper cites Attention in Large Language Models Yields Efficient Zero-Shot Re-Rankers.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Attention in Large Language Models Yields Efficient Zero-Shot Re-Rankers

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.252429Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.252429Z digest=sha256:0699aee0ff0974064f1741c8032124b92691477ceb45293e3424306cbbc9aaaa

Observation 7ffb1c9a-8245-4a0b-bcec-aef4e54cfadc · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 11

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.202210Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.256484Z digest=sha256:b229ca5b41597040247b560f172aa29d9b268ce1a3c692c7ec97277634fbbd39

Observation f863deb5-4b7b-432d-a8f3-bad916be3ef6 · outbound

This paper cites Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning track.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning track

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.260444Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.260444Z digest=sha256:3138d421910e65997af7412b8283e522dcd1e7f2fd83a1efc253db68164f0be2

Observation 77276f47-a299-416c-b4f7-ba76b150ad97 · outbound

This paper cites Calibration of Pre-trained Transformers.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Calibration of Pre-trained Transformers

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.264309Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.264309Z digest=sha256:217294193752f99c75f50451dadd702e6d1050fa8e6c5959494cf90bce64ce92

Observation c892fb2f-fef9-4940-93fd-8bd5e4b05bdd · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 14

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.268059Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.268059Z digest=sha256:ae0495fa5826188ac72d865148bbac81f41a7d44b6c7f53e8de6e67e16dcc6ea

Observation 942fec91-8a57-4fbe-8680-c55f2cc687e8 · outbound

This paper cites Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey

Reference 15

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.271643Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.271643Z digest=sha256:65d63e613492602460ed74c6d282fdb7f2648cc67ecc619c77ec3830990cdcf7

Observation 62cde85a-f37c-4ac6-b554-5a848a051b02 · outbound

This paper cites ComplexTempQA:A 100m Dataset for Complex Temporal Question Answering.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models ComplexTempQA:A 100m Dataset for Complex Temporal Question Answering

Reference 16

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.275605Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.275605Z digest=sha256:df63942be1b62cdcf0d6d14e602524ceb4a300e26ef4d8a009dc56cd34ba997b

Observation a88aacd8-5d3b-4c5d-b1d6-7c35231fde31 · outbound

This paper cites LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models LLM-Blender: Ensembling Large Language Models with Pairwise Ranking and Generative Fusion

Reference 17

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.279206Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.279206Z digest=sha256:6008faa8ddd933d2332f15f2b3f7f60f20130a6b54041b3c25fdb1a0f620da3f

Observation a6f757f4-4a98-44fe-a810-32d5771a962a · outbound

This paper cites LongRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Long-context LLMs.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models LongRAG: Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Long-context LLMs

Reference 18

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.283254Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.283254Z digest=sha256:cd735c489175fe465f26cb1ad91be6c56734b79f8d104a700d91a1072dd8c513

Observation 9c9bcc95-5c4a-430f-ae64-403988a1b2d9 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 19

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.287461Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.287461Z digest=sha256:c8682ad7d2206e75263d5189ec418d45366086e5dcfae5f9eaa5f0bb99d23fec

Observation de076d88-154b-45ad-843a-3b8699de1ba7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 20

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.291076Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.291076Z digest=sha256:cc0ebaffe910a364c4fe65eb668be51b781dd0490d078da8eb4341fb01fa783d

Observation c7ad41e8-1f04-46e6-8722-87f661da9613 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 21

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.159811Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.294554Z digest=sha256:0cf29e0eb8f1755033432813bd0ff6a9657d8753eee64c60c3d9ca6d04b68c92

Observation 8426a61a-f140-4c58-acb1-854efb905654 · outbound

This paper cites u ttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rockt \.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models u ttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rockt \

Reference 22

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.298290Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.298290Z digest=sha256:1f868fd679390f3f6ae99d75eb63b316fee232c0e1595348082aa6aaaf61cb26

Observation dd6aacdb-2d54-4a43-95c7-6f3f05ad92b7 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 23

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.135770Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.301994Z digest=sha256:82f72174f80c30730371efd62283232e9e648969572b7d6b80baa86e1b0762ec

Observation a31b9590-6392-410e-9e66-c77f1f0b98e6 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 24

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.121107Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.305541Z digest=sha256:5c5cde917a11e61f376341c1f83c160daab4d2f18d3545efd4e46d2433c83d8b

Observation b03c0e8c-77d2-484a-ac7c-6fd8d1b78cf1 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 25

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.310224Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.310224Z digest=sha256:cdc5d95db4904bb405d0d7e90aab371e2fe603e22ebb462d42cb383da037b80e

Observation a4f180b9-8387-4fef-a57c-b3d0f102b746 · outbound

This paper cites Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with a Large Language Model.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with a Large Language Model

Reference 26

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.313737Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.313737Z digest=sha256:7a552d990daa54b9d8a62994aa78beb12eb295adf3b0ace050c06dd91a8abf9f

Observation 9f5e0e86-2e0f-4747-89b9-79f171d125f2 · outbound

This paper cites RaFe: Ranking Feedback Improves Query Rewriting for RAG.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models RaFe: Ranking Feedback Improves Query Rewriting for RAG

Reference 27

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.317839Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.317839Z digest=sha256:c24e432f4713c30a3d74a69caeb7dde0e7c564d4d9410f6a85c3a3772433770f

Observation 6f21cfb0-fbc8-4123-ad5d-c23b3c2d827d · outbound

This paper cites Exploring Hint Generation Approaches in Open-Domain Question Answering.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Exploring Hint Generation Approaches in Open-Domain Question Answering

Reference 28

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.718703Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.321615Z digest=sha256:cf8c6c06b2827437c72571b0ec2a406328ff9417fdff1e2008f3e0c36013dbcd

Observation 8db80740-a756-44dc-9abf-01a303ffdb1c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 29

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.096639Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.325436Z digest=sha256:f2441959f119f7206701925401e030e08df3404e6f2242faf254c2cb6419825f

Observation cfbd882d-01d6-40ea-820a-e161e0b2d502 · outbound

This paper cites Passage Re-ranking with BERT.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Passage Re-ranking with BERT

Reference 30

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.329225Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.329225Z digest=sha256:dd2e81c5d398fceebcc147175289644cb07c8588fd7ef30307043c59ec93cd38

Observation a07b3e0e-c406-4a0f-aa7f-7b44a461ea40 · outbound

This paper cites Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Model.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Document Ranking with a Pretrained Sequence-to-Sequence Model

Reference 31

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.333064Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.333064Z digest=sha256:2680c85d284b00d92eeab62564235eef56b1c6739ac3a401fa707a783298025f

Observation 863a2112-37d2-4c06-8dec-bd05cf731058 · outbound

This paper cites RankVicuna: Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with Open-Source Large Language Models.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models RankVicuna: Zero-Shot Listwise Document Reranking with Open-Source Large Language Models

Reference 32

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.336832Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.336832Z digest=sha256:21013eb26f17ef423db40606e107f1204a314430528d830e95704cd3549d7c31

Observation 7b8c2880-0d3a-4bb2-9f71-4bdd82d095f2 · outbound

This paper cites RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models RankZephyr: Effective and Robust Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking is a Breeze!

Reference 33

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.340516Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.340516Z digest=sha256:3889775632b303ec8503b485b3f0328768bba18ecd2c5d2d7ebf625e4deb8722

Observation b3c644a5-8c76-42e3-8592-f47a90a4098b · outbound

This paper cites Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Prompting.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Prompting

Reference 34

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.344412Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.344412Z digest=sha256:a142cfa8f14899ed2df30c024d8edb87e6f364ab24ce816f7cc69ef7e0c580e8

Observation 7bf3b6e5-7fdc-4612-8616-f1aa84875851 · outbound

This paper cites EcoRank: Budget-Constrained Text Re-ranking Using Large Language Models.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models EcoRank: Budget-Constrained Text Re-ranking Using Large Language Models

Reference 35

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.348348Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.348348Z digest=sha256:4d80c651e5add791b9df42aca3b1b0f38c5f8bacee148374ebfcb219a1422faa

Observation 75dd6802-1c72-4b8e-8606-491611149dea · outbound

This paper cites FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decoding.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models FIRST: Faster Improved Listwise Reranking with Single Token Decoding

Reference 36

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.352432Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.352432Z digest=sha256:2ed6fb4e5b87f4bea83283fd50af4dc9dafc535cf98ca310db85b389f76dd3b2

Observation f71f28c1-f1a6-4e61-ab41-3cdce5021d4b · outbound

This paper cites Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generation.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generation

Reference 37

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.356287Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.356287Z digest=sha256:7a1e83af1f3e6cc52722854308cf5c7b50f2d363a65c4b8a0b08e7119b838fe9

Observation 300c1050-3903-4cd8-a3d5-dc7bee20849e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 38

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.080554Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.360009Z digest=sha256:d1cffb5761ba836973a13be8f90135bd9de3a860052d9c555a6af1dee9888ab4

Observation b22c933a-d9f4-4024-8c0f-bf3f1665e240 · outbound

This paper cites Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agents.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Is ChatGPT Good at Search? Investigating Large Language Models as Re-Ranking Agents

Reference 39

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.363545Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.363545Z digest=sha256:50c031fedbbf4dc551f174e65cf68f0be296c674b485fb97578bc07ccdd461b7

Observation 4ce76377-8243-45a1-aa11-147c6d5c2fd0 · outbound

This paper cites Scaling Down, LiTting Up: Efficient Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking with Seq2seq Encoder-Decoder Models.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Scaling Down, LiTting Up: Efficient Zero-Shot Listwise Reranking with Seq2seq Encoder-Decoder Models

Reference 40

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.367334Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.367334Z digest=sha256:08eb141cae543d47cb3967af6b040c4bc773f9a796e7bda6cbf0e57d2f5812ef

Observation c00d3269-cc29-42a2-83d0-48e167ea6f91 · outbound

This paper cites BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Models

Reference 41

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.371011Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.371011Z digest=sha256:f6a7f6f3874b1e0737de9a70f443d36a47549b437fdea83b7f3aa51add141e63

Observation 541b3d8c-4e6f-4aff-bfd4-9d8b13b59ff5 · outbound

This paper cites Do Large Language Models Rank Fairly? An Empirical Study on the Fairness of LLMs as Rankers.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Do Large Language Models Rank Fairly? An Empirical Study on the Fairness of LLMs as Rankers

Reference 42

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.374649Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.374649Z digest=sha256:5d45f394888b03d505615ebfb47fb8b2cfc6d4aeb553c497fae51fb0bbcdbd6f

Observation 4f6309a1-76d3-4938-86b5-2c7f69e84060 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 43

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.066691Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.380223Z digest=sha256:b12e0c26d7e21ebd19594f6962acc4410209a20cd1ae4e0e3282beb5d6e00dd7

Observation 7e34c48b-04aa-41d8-ac88-5faa755c050a · outbound

This paper cites ListT5: Listwise Reranking with Fusion-in-Decoder Improves Zero-shot Retrieval.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models ListT5: Listwise Reranking with Fusion-in-Decoder Improves Zero-shot Retrieval

Reference 44

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.383780Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.383780Z digest=sha256:56d5f85cc90d22de9709af47fdf1d4e13de495e4dfb62c18c1e5a70406ced69f

Observation a07d5f22-9a29-422a-af58-ffd4a220a242 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 45

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.387516Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.387516Z digest=sha256:de1aeec0ae9e702f98ca6fe9b37210c42e3bee8315eeb49bbee1bdaad994db1c

Observation 47abec7d-6c94-45f0-9274-fff2a78206eb · outbound

This paper cites Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generators.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Generate rather than Retrieve: Large Language Models are Strong Context Generators

Reference 46

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.391228Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.391228Z digest=sha256:e64f1fd97dc94c26a8c684e7c2a6c2f8306cb7eb9cf5860b0d09ba94068fb9d6

Observation ee1e32b8-0349-492d-be3e-5dbd0034c27c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 47

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.051641Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.395055Z digest=sha256:a0af5cb8108b4e699b52a3dfb8becbad01ee5355c1ec70214dfb47915565a107

Observation 6b9a6a77-7eb3-4206-af5b-52b8f33acfd8 · outbound

This paper cites Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Survey.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Survey

Reference 48

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.398507Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.398507Z digest=sha256:bebc2934e24f1a1ecdc979c72b25fbc2435078fdc6aeb934f2d9e43a66ef452c

Observation f7294ef5-c64b-44ff-9152-1ecf1040aba2 · outbound

This paper cites Beyond Yes and No: Improving Zero-Shot LLM Rankers via Scoring Fine-Grained Relevance Labels.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Beyond Yes and No: Improving Zero-Shot LLM Rankers via Scoring Fine-Grained Relevance Labels

Reference 49

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.402548Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.402548Z digest=sha256:ab47ed3af14048f324b23dfa6e1de85dc4621cb1934635e8b4f5e620daaa0c1f

Observation 1639bbfe-9ead-4b95-a795-289404d194c3 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 50

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.036075Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.406387Z digest=sha256:bb56173fa5736c51b4915b54ee542309366cb84b762242a3e10a35985a200d8a

Observation 58334d42-7bc1-4e68-8801-000eb0c85a65 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models Unresolved cited work

Reference 51

Resolution
unresolved
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:16.021669Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-18T06:34:40.430872+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.410192Z digest=sha256:dfc660f91a372d837c3b565510e5323f040b19dd1f45840250df1217b4c793cd

Observation 3652fe1e-2724-45fd-9a8e-87e84b16ae1e · outbound

This paper cites online" 'onlinestring :=.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models online" 'onlinestring :=

Reference 52

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.414061Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.414061Z digest=sha256:08ac289cac226cb45b30dcd6453ec049544e3d167f7c5b1ec2958bdfd2425e72

Observation ec2ac2bb-17e1-47cf-95a9-af91958392db · outbound

This paper cites write newline.

How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models write newline

Reference 53

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T17:15:15.418227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-05T17:15:15.418227Z digest=sha256:807b4f3f40773a5ecac764cbc507d78d246c35af2bcbb8826be3200ce2395078

Pith citing papers

Observation aa2ebf22-f909-4802-990e-d4fe29397e0d · inbound

Scaling Search Relevance: Augmenting App Store Ranking with LLM-Generated Judgments cites this paper.

Scaling Search Relevance: Augmenting App Store Ranking with LLM-Generated Judgments How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models

Reference 1

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-02T20:27:45.962398Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-02T20:27:45.962398Z digest=sha256:244effaf8e2fb98def20f02eaf2257fba38f34ec2bfea71f22a49d9d14bc50e6