Pith. sign in

REVIEW 38 cited by

Overview of the TREC 2019 deep learning track

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.07820 v2 pith:OOYIO736 submitted 2020-03-17 cs.IR cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.CLcs.LG
keywords deeplearningtrainingdataqueriestracklargereusable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The Deep Learning Track is a new track for TREC 2019, with the goal of studying ad hoc ranking in a large data regime. It is the first track with large human-labeled training sets, introducing two sets corresponding to two tasks, each with rigorous TREC-style blind evaluation and reusable test sets. The document retrieval task has a corpus of 3.2 million documents with 367 thousand training queries, for which we generate a reusable test set of 43 queries. The passage retrieval task has a corpus of 8.8 million passages with 503 thousand training queries, for which we generate a reusable test set of 43 queries. This year 15 groups submitted a total of 75 runs, using various combinations of deep learning, transfer learning and traditional IR ranking methods. Deep learning runs significantly outperformed traditional IR runs. Possible explanations for this result are that we introduced large training data and we included deep models trained on such data in our judging pools, whereas some past studies did not have such training data or pooling.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 38 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 71 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. PLAID-PRF: Pseudo-Relevance Feedback with Centroid-like Tokens in PLAID

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    PLAID-PRF performs pseudo-relevance feedback by treating PLAID's indexing-time centroid codes as semantic terms, selecting diverse reconstructed token vectors to append to the query and rerunning PLAID.

  2. Mutual Linearity in and out of Stationarity for Markov Jump Processes: A Trajectory-Based Approach

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Trajectory-level linear response yields mutual linearity of observables under single-edge rate perturbation for Markov jump processes, including non-stationary state and counting observables.

  3. How Good are LLM-based Rerankers? An Empirical Analysis of State-of-the-Art Reranking Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    On a new benchmark of post-April 2025 queries, LLM rerankers show a 5-15% performance drop compared with familiar benchmarks, and lightweight models match them on efficiency and sometimes accuracy.

  4. The Matryoshka Hypencoder

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Matryoshka-style loss lets one Hypencoder generate Q-Nets of different widths, so a single model can be deployed at multiple efficiency-effectiveness points.

  5. Tool-Adaptive LLM Reranker

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pointwise LLM reranking cast as an agentic MDP with language-preserving warm-up and asymmetric cost-aware RL yields adaptive tool use, SOTA NDCG, and high throughput.

  6. Trie-based Experiment Plans for Efficient IR Pipeline Experiments

    cs.IR 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Trie-based experiment plans reduce the duration of comparative evaluations of IR pipelines by 26% versus linear plans in a BM25-MonoT5-DuoT5 demonstration on MSMARCO v2.

  7. BlitzRank: Principled Zero-shot Ranking Agents with Tournament Graphs

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A tournament-graph framework converts each k-wise comparison into many pairwise edges, infers additional orderings transitively, and cuts LLM reranking token use by 25-40% at equal accuracy.

  8. Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Tasks

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CRUMB is a new benchmark for complex, multi-aspect retrieval tasks on which state-of-the-art retrieval models score poorly, and query rewriting does not rescue the best models.

  9. Evaluating the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation to Adversarial Evidence in the Health Domain

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Misleading health documents in RAG context sharply lower LLM accuracy, and heavily helpful-biased retrieval pools restore it.

  10. Upcycling Candidate Tokens of Large Language Models for Query Expansion

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using unselected top-k candidate tokens from a single LLM decoding pass as extra query terms improves retrieval over standard keyword expansion while using far fewer tokens than document-level methods.

  11. ERank: Fusing Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning for Effective and Efficient Text Reranking

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ERank trains a pointwise reasoning-LLM reranker with fine-grained integer scoring and a listwise reinforcement-learning reward, reporting nDCG@10 of 40.2 on BRIGHT for its 32B variant with BM25 hybrid scoring.

  12. Fashion-AlterEval: A Dataset for Improved Evaluation of Conversational Recommendation Systems with Alternative Relevant Items

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper contributes alternative-item relevance judgments for fashion CRS targets and two meta-simulators that let users switch targets, reporting that alternative-aware evaluation raises measured CRS effectiveness.

  13. Shifting from Ranking to Set Selection for Retrieval Augmented Generation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SETR identifies a query's information requirements with chain-of-thought reasoning and selects a compact passage set, improving multi-hop RAG accuracy over fixed-top-k reranking baselines.

  14. Harnessing Pairwise Ranking Prompting Through Sample-Efficient Ranking Distillation

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pairwise Ranking Distillation trains a pointwise ranker from pairwise LLM teacher labels and matches full-pair distillation using just 2% of pairs on TREC-DL.

  15. JointRank: Rank Large Set with Single Pass

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JointRank partitions candidates into overlapping blocks, ranks each block in parallel with an LLM, and reconstructs a global ranking by aggregating the resulting pairwise comparisons.

  16. Precise Zero-Shot Pointwise Ranking with LLMs through Post-Aggregated Global Context Information

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A summary-based anchor document enables contrastive pointwise scoring that, when averaged with ordinary pointwise scores, improves zero-shot LLM reranking.

  17. Decoding Dense Embeddings: Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting and Discretizing Dense Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Dense retrieval embeddings can be decomposed into interpretable latent concepts that serve both as explanations and as efficient sparse indexing units for retrieval.

  18. Disentangling Locality and Entropy in Ranking Distillation

    cs.IR 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under ranking distillation, complex hard-negative sampling pipelines yield little or no benefit over BM25 sampling, while intermediate teacher score entropy improves in-domain effectiveness and the paper's generalizat...

  19. Modeling Ranking Properties with In-Context Learning

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In-context examples that encode a target distribution over document attributes can steer LLM rerankers toward fairness and diversity while roughly preserving relevance on four IR benchmarks.

  20. Don't "Overthink" Passage Reranking: Is Reasoning Truly Necessary?

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Standard pointwise rerankers beat reasoning-based pointwise rerankers under identical training, and removing the reasoning process at inference partially recovers the gap.

  21. Reranking with Compressed Document Representation

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A reranker trained on 8-token PISCO document embeddings plus a short query achieves near-identical nDCG@10 to full-text rerankers on BeIR and TREC-DL while running up to 16x faster.

  22. An Alternative to FLOPS Regularization to Effectively Productionize SPLADE-Doc

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DF-FLOPS, a document-frequency-weighted variant of FLOPS regularization, cuts SPLADE-Doc latency in production Solr from 922 ms to 88-161 ms per query with only a 2.2-point MRR@10 loss in-domain.

  23. Rank-K: Test-Time Reasoning for Listwise Reranking

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rank-K, a reasoning-model-based listwise reranker distilled from DeepSeek R1 traces, beats RankZephyr on several benchmarks but only marginally on TREC DL 2019/2020.

  24. Beyond Sequential Reranking: Reranker-Guided Search Improves Reasoning Intensive Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reranker-Guided-Search, a greedy graph search steered by reranker scores, outperforms sequential top-k reranking under a fixed budget on three reasoning-intensive retrieval benchmarks.

  25. SEAL: Structure and Element Aware Learning to Improve Long Structured Document Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A contrastive fine-tuning recipe that adds HTML structure and element-masking signals improves long structured document retrieval, with reported MRR@10 gains of about four points on BGE-M3.

  26. Does UMBRELA Work on Other LLMs?

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    UMBRELA relevance judgments made with DeepSeek V3 are close to GPT-4o, and even small models preserve leaderboard rankings although per-document agreement with humans drops.

  27. A Comparative Study of Specialized LLMs as Dense Retrievers

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Specialized Qwen2.5 7B models differ in dense retrieval quality: math and long-reasoning variants degrade performance, while coder and vision-language variants improve zero-shot text and code retrieval.

  28. On the Merits of LLM-Based Corpus Enrichment

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-generated, query-biased documents added to a search corpus improve retrieval effectiveness, RAG answer accuracy, and answer attribution in proof-of-concept experiments that use oracle-selected source documents.

  29. Are Optimal Algorithms Still Optimal? Rethinking Sorting in LLM-Based Pairwise Ranking with Batching and Caching

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Under an LLM-inference cost model, Quicksort with batching uses roughly 44% fewer inference calls than Heapsort for pairwise document ranking, reversing the classical comparison-count ordering.

  30. REARANK: Reasoning Re-ranking Agent via Reinforcement Learning

    cs.IR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Training a listwise reranker with reinforcement learning and explicit reasoning on only 179 annotated queries yields reranking quality comparable to GPT-4.

  31. RankLLM: A Python Package for Reranking with LLMs

    cs.IR 2025-05 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    RankLLM is an open-source Python package that modularly supports pointwise, pairwise, and listwise LLM rerankers, with integrated retrieval, evaluation, training, and response analysis, and reproduces results from Ran...

  32. Measuring Hypothesis Testing Errors in the Evaluation of Retrieval Systems

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper adds Type II error metrics to the evaluation of relevance judgment sets and shows that balanced accuracy and Matthews correlation can summarize qrels' discriminative power in one number.

  33. The Next Phase of Scientific Fact-Checking: Advanced Evidence Retrieval from Complex Structured Academic Papers

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a full-paper, evidence-aware retrieval agenda for scientific fact-checking and shows that combining verification feedback with semantic reranking improves evidence recall on SciFact-Open and Check-COVID.

  34. Comparative Analysis of Lion and AdamW Optimizers for Cross-Encoder Reranking with MiniLM, GTE, and ModernBERT

    cs.IR 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Lion and AdamW are compared for reranker fine-tuning, but the reported Lion gains are confounded by a 10x learning-rate difference and an inverted GPU-utilization metric.

  35. GOLFer: Smaller LM-Generated Documents Hallucination Filter & Combiner for Query Expansion in Information Retrieval

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    GOLFer filters hallucinated sentences from small-LM-generated hypothetical documents and reweights the rest into the query, improving retrieval at lower cost than large LLM expansion.

  36. Exp4Fuse: A Rank Fusion Framework for Enhanced Sparse Retrieval using Large Language Model-based Query Expansion

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Exp4Fuse improves sparse retrieval by fusing the ranked lists from the original query and an LLM-expanded query using a modified reciprocal rank fusion.

  37. A New Query Expansion Approach via Agent-Mediated Dialogic Inquiry

    cs.IR 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AMD uses three LLM agents (Socratic questioning, dialogic answering, reflective feedback) to generate and refine pseudo-answers for query expansion, reporting gains over prior methods on BEIR and TREC benchmarks.

  38. The Societal Impact of Foundation Models: Advancing Evidence-based AI Policy

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A dissertation that synthesizes prior work on foundation models into a three-part framework: conceptual framing, empirical measurement (HELM, FMTI), and evidence-based AI policy.

Pith tools