Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 112 references

Towards 6G Intelligence: The Role of Generative AI in Future Wireless Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Generative AI is the creative core that turns 6G from a faster network into an ambient-intelligent ecosystem.

desk verdict A competent survey of GenAI for 6G with an over-strong central claim; the AmI framing is useful but the 'foundational' thesis is asserted, not shown. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19495 v1 pith:CTTOQL76 submitted 2025-08-27 cs.DC cs.LGeess.SP

classification cs.DCcs.LGeess.SP
keywords AmbientIntelligenceGenerativeAI6GnetworksSemanticCommunicationsDigitalTwinsGANsVAEsDiffusionModels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that realizing ambient intelligence at global scale requires 6G networks that perceive, reason, and act in real time, and that generative AI is not a supporting tool but the foundational mechanism for those abilities. Its central claim is that because GenAI learns data distributions and can synthesize realistic samples, it closes the gaps that block ambient intelligence: sparse sensor and channel data, bulky intent communication, reactive rather than predictive control, and privacy risks in digital twins. The paper maps four generative architecture families—GANs, VAEs, diffusion models, and generative transformers—to concrete 6G use cases, and argues that edge/fog computing, IoT swarms, intelligent reflecting surfaces, and non-terrestrial networks form the distributed substrate that can host GenAI. A sympathetic reader would take this as a design thesis: 6G should be built with GenAI as a native layer, not as an afterthought.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the generative model's ability to learn a data distribution and draw new samples from it. The paper organizes this around four architecture families: GANs, which synthesize high-fidelity samples through an adversarial generator–discriminator game; VAEs, which learn structured latent spaces for compression and uncertainty-aware estimation; diffusion models, which generate by reversing a gradual noising process and offer stable, diverse, conditionable synthesis; and generative transformers and large language models, which serve as autoregressive planners with few-shot generalization and multimodal reasoning. These four families supply the concrete operations—filling missing data, compressing intent, forecasting states, and updating twins—that carry the paper's argument that GenAI is a native capability layer for 6G.

What would settle it

A head-to-head evaluation on a representative ambient-intelligence task, such as proactive resource allocation or a privacy-preserving digital twin update, where a non-generative baseline (classical optimization or discriminative learning) matches or beats a GenAI pipeline on accuracy, latency, energy, and privacy under the same data budget, would settle the question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that GenAI is the creative core of 6G-based ambient intelligence: it is the mechanism that lets networks perceive, predict, and act in context. By learning data distributions rather than only input–output mappings, generative models can produce realistic synthetic sensor and channel data for under-observed areas, translate user intent into compact semantic messages, forecast future network conditions for proactive control, and refresh digital twins without exposing raw data. The paper argues that these four capabilities are exactly the gaps that separate today's reactive networks from ambient intelligence, and that the four model families—GANs, VAEs, diffusion models, and generative transformers—are complementary tools for filling them. It further claims that the 6G infrastructure of edge and fog computing, IoT swarms, intelligent reflecting surfaces, and non-terrestrial networks can host and accelerate these models, transforming the network from a passive conduit into an adaptive substrate for distributed intelligence.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the needs of ambient intelligence are best met by generative models that synthesize data, rather than by discriminative classifiers, classical optimization, or deterministic control, and the paper asserts this without testing it against alternatives.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under-observed rural, indoor, and non-terrestrial areas could receive synthetic sensor and channel data, improving coverage and link design without exhaustive measurement campaigns.
  • Semantic communication interfaces could carry compressed user intent rather than raw data, reducing bandwidth and latency for ambient services.
  • Proactive control becomes feasible: generative predictors forecast mobility, traffic, and interference, letting beams, intelligent reflecting surfaces, and handovers be pre-configured.
  • Digital twins could be updated continuously from local observations while differential privacy and governance metadata protect raw data.
  • Edge and fog nodes, IoT swarms, reflecting surfaces, and non-terrestrial networks would act as a distributed hosting substrate for GenAI, making the network an adaptive intelligence fabric rather than a transport pipe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the thesis implies a comparative research program—benchmarking GenAI pipelines against discriminative learning and classical optimization on the same ambient-intelligence tasks; if non-generative baselines match them on accuracy, latency, energy, and privacy, the creative-core claim would need to be scaled back.
  • Inference: if the thesis holds, 6G standardization should prioritize semantic interfaces and model-lifecycle hooks before full deployment, because interoperability of generative models across devices, edges, and satellites is the practical bottleneck.
  • Inference: the argument points toward wireless foundation models that few-shot adapt across spectrum, channel, traffic, and user-context tasks, which would shift how wireless datasets are collected, shared, and audited.
  • Inference: a testable extension is to measure whether synthetic data generated by VAEs or diffusion models actually improves downstream ambient-intelligence decisions compared with simply collecting more real data at the same energy cost.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a position survey arguing that Generative AI (GenAI) is not a peripheral tool but the 'creative core' of 6G-enabled ambient intelligence (AmI). It reviews four generative model families—GANs, VAEs, diffusion models, and generative transformers—and maps them to AmI applications such as spectrum sharing, URLLC, intelligent security, and digital twins. It then discusses how edge/fog computing, IoT device swarms, intelligent reflecting surfaces, and non-terrestrial networks can host or accelerate distributed GenAI, and it closes with four open-challenge areas: energy-efficient on-device training, trustworthy synthetic data, federated generative learning under wireless constraints, and AmI-specific standardization. The central thesis is a research vision stated in the Abstract and restated in the Conclusion, supported by selected prior results rather than by new derivations, experiments, or a comparative analysis against non-generative alternatives.

Significance. If accepted as a position paper, the manuscript offers a useful structured synthesis of a fast-moving area: the taxonomy of generative architectures, the tables mapping 6G design challenges to GenAI levers, and the engagement with concrete standards (3GPP, ITU-T, O-RAN, NIST) are valuable for readers seeking an organized research agenda. The paper is not, however, an empirical demonstration of GenAI's foundational role, and it contains no derivations, machine-checked proofs, or falsifiable predictions. Its main value is in organizing existing work and articulating research directions, provided the strength of the claims is brought in line with the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [§1 and §6] The central claim that GenAI is a 'foundational element' (Abstract) and 'the mechanism that lets networks perceive, predict, and act in context' (§6) is asserted rather than established. The supporting evidence consists of selected examples showing that generative models can be applied to AmI tasks, but the paper does not argue why generative models are necessary rather than merely useful, nor does it compare them against discriminative AI, classical optimization, or deterministic control as alternatives for the same functions. Because the conclusion in §6 is stated unconditionally, the thesis is overclaimed relative to the survey evidence.
  2. [§3.3, Fig. 4] In the sensor-imputation example, the text states that 'the baseline achieves slightly lower mean absolute error' while the generative method 'offers smoother reconstructions and captures the underlying dynamics more robustly.' Since imputation of missing sensor streams is one of the four key AmI gaps named in §1, reporting a quantitative disadvantage on the primary metric and only a qualitative advantage does not support the subsequent claim that diffusion models provide 'a compelling foundation for AmI pipelines.' The authors should either supply quantitative evidence of superiority on the relevant tasks or explicitly present the advantage as qualitative and task-dependent.
  3. [§5 vs. §6] Section 5 identifies four cross-cutting challenges that 'must be addressed' before ambient intelligence becomes pervasive—energy-efficient on-device training, trustworthy synthetic data, federated generative learning under wireless constraints, and AmI-specific standardization. Yet §6 concludes unconditionally that GenAI 'is not a peripheral addition to sixth generation networks. It is the mechanism that lets networks perceive, predict, and act.' These statements are in tension: if the challenges in §5 are genuinely unresolved, the conclusion should be conditional on their resolution or the strength of the conclusion should be reduced. At minimum, the conclusion should explicitly state that the foundational role is prospective and contingent on the §5 challenges being met.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 2] The row header 'F ederated learning' contains a stray space and should read 'Federated learning'; also, the row content reads as a list of techniques rather than a distinct challenge area, so consider aligning it with the other rows.
  2. [References [11] and [15]] References [11] and [15] are the same arXiv preprint (Khoramnejad and Hossain, 'Generative AI for the optimization of next-generation wireless networks'); the duplicate should be removed and the citation numbering adjusted.
  3. [§4.2] The paragraph citing [74] on power–subcarrier allocation with time-sharing in multicarrier NOMA is presented as an 'optimization baseline,' but its connection to distributed GenAI is not explained; please clarify how this baseline informs the GenAI discussion or remove it.
  4. [Figure 2] Figure 2 is reproduced from [21], but the text does not specify the channel emulator, GAN architecture, or evaluation protocol used to compute the BER mismatch; a sentence describing the setup would help the reader judge whether the result transfers to 6G AmI scenarios.
  5. [Introduction and Conclusion] The manuscript oscillates between 'we argue' (Introduction) and 'we demonstrate' (end of Introduction and §6); since the manuscript is a position survey, the verb 'demonstrate' overstates the evidentiary status and should be replaced with 'argue' or 'propose.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: a position survey whose central claim rests on external literature and is explicitly conditional; self-citations are illustrative, not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper is a position survey, not a derivation. Its central claim—that GenAI is “the creative core” of 6G ambient intelligence—is asserted on the basis of cited prior work (e.g., refs [4]–[11]) and illustrated with application examples. No equation in the paper defines a quantity in terms of the conclusion, and no fit parameter is renamed as a prediction. The self-citations (e.g., [8], [19], [48], [51], [74], [77], [79], [81], [86], [87], [96], [98], [99]) are used as examples of GenAI or deep-learning applications in wireless settings; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem, and none carries the argument alone. The paper’s own Section 5 lists open challenges (energy-efficient on-device training, trustworthy synthetic data, federated generative learning under wireless constraints, and AmI-specific standardization) that make the thesis explicitly conditional, reinforcing that the contribution is a research vision rather than a closed formal argument. There is therefore no circular reduction to exhibit.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The thesis rests on the unproven suitability of generative models for AmI tasks, the transferability of cited lab-scale demonstrations to production 6G deployments, and the assumption that 6G will deliver its projected capabilities. No free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Generative models' ability to synthesize realistic data is necessary to close key AmI gaps: under-observed areas, semantic compression, proactive control, and privacy-preserving digital twins.
    This is the load-bearing premise of the thesis. It is asserted in the Introduction and never proven. If discriminative AI or classical optimization could close these gaps, the central claim weakens.
  • domain assumption The cited demonstrations of GenAI in wireless contexts, such as ChannelGAN, VAE channel estimation, diffusion imputation, and LLM planning, transfer to full AmI deployments at scale.
    Section 3 uses these as evidence, but no AmI-scale system is built or evaluated in the chapter.
  • domain assumption 6G will deliver the anticipated extreme data rates, low latency, massive connectivity, and integrated sensing that the AmI-in-6G vision depends on.
    Section 1 frames 6G as the ideal substrate for ambient intelligence, but these 6G capabilities remain part of a vision rather than established facts.
  • standard math The mathematical formulations of GANs, VAEs, diffusion models, and transformers are as stated in the cited foundational papers, including the ELBO objective and the denoising diffusion loss.
    The paper quotes these equations as standard results without derivation, which is acceptable for a review but means the equations are assumed correct.
  • domain assumption Representative figures from prior works, such as Figures 2, 3, and 4, support the qualitative claims without re-analysis.
    The figures are reproduced or referenced to illustrate claims, but their quantitative content is not integrated with the chapter's thesis.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards 6G Intelligence: The Role of Generative AI in Future Wireless Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CTTOQL76

@misc{pith2026250819495,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards 6G Intelligence: The Role of Generative AI in Future Wireless Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CTTOQL76}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19495}
}
read the original abstract

Ambient intelligence (AmI) is a computing paradigm in which physical environments are embedded with sensing, computation, and communication so they can perceive people and context, decide appropriate actions, and respond autonomously. Realizing AmI at global scale requires sixth generation (6G) wireless networks with capabilities for real time perception, reasoning, and action aligned with human behavior and mobility patterns. We argue that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is the creative core of such environments. Unlike traditional AI, GenAI learns data distributions and can generate realistic samples, making it well suited to close key AmI gaps, including generating synthetic sensor and channel data in under observed areas, translating user intent into compact, semantic messages, predicting future network conditions for proactive control, and updating digital twins without compromising privacy. This chapter reviews foundational GenAI models, GANs, VAEs, diffusion models, and generative transformers, and connects them to practical AmI use cases, including spectrum sharing, ultra reliable low latency communication, intelligent security, and context aware digital twins. We also examine how 6G enablers, such as edge and fog computing, IoT device swarms, intelligent reflecting surfaces (IRS), and non terrestrial networks, can host or accelerate distributed GenAI. Finally, we outline open challenges in energy efficient on device training, trustworthy synthetic data, federated generative learning, and AmI specific standardization. We show that GenAI is not a peripheral addition, but a foundational element for transforming 6G from a faster network into an ambient intelligent ecosystem.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.19495 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. An ecosystem showing how sensors, communication infrastructure, computation nodes, and AI [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Bit-Error-Rate (BER) mismatch (%) across channel emulators. The GAN-based approach yields [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Rate–distortion trade-off for learned variational compression (context + hyperprior) compared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Examples of probabilistic time series imputation on healthcare (left) and air quality (right) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    Khoramnejad, E

    F. Khoramnejad, E. Hossain, Generative ai for the optimization of next-generation wireless networks: Basics, state-of-the-art, and open challenges, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17454 (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.17454

  2. [1]

    Privat, N

    G. Privat, N. Streitz, Ambient Intelligence, 2009, pp. 60.1 – 60.17

  3. [2]

    W. Saad, M. Bennis, M. Chen, A vision of 6g wireless systems: Applications, trends, technologies, and open research problems, IEEE Network 34 (3) (2020) 134–142

  4. [3]

    S. Dang, O. Amin, B. Shihada, M.-S. Alouini, What should 6g be?, Nature Electronics 3 (1) (2020) 20–29

  5. [4]

    Y. Yang, Y. Li, W. Zhang, F. Qin, P. Zhu, C.-X. Wang, Generative-adversarial-network-based wireless channel modeling: Challenges and opportunities, IEEE Communications Magazine 57 (3) (2019) 22–

  6. [5]

    Celik, A

    A. Celik, A. M. Eltawil, At the dawn of generative ai era: A tutorial-cum-survey on new frontiers in 6g wireless intelligence, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18587 (2024)

  7. [6]

    Zhong, M

    R. Zhong, M. Zhang, K. B. Letaief, Enabling distributed generative artificial intelligence in 6g: Mobile edge generation, IoT Journal 11 (6) (2024) 5192–5205

  8. [7]

    Z. Tao, H. Zhang, K. B. Letaief, Wireless network digital twin for 6g: Generative ai as a key enabler, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17451 (2024)

Show all 112 references
  1. [8]

    Bashir, M

    A. Bashir, M. A. Mohsin, M. Jazib, H. Iqbal, MINDTwin AI: Multiphysics informed digital-twin for fault localization in induction motor using AI, in: 2023 International Conference on Big Data, Knowledge and Control Systems Engineering, 2023. doi:10.1109/BdKCSE59280.2023.10339747

  2. [9]

    Y. Xu, H. Zhang, K. B. Letaief, Decentralization of generative ai via mixture of experts for wireless networks: A comprehensive survey, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19660 (2025)

  3. [10]

    Q. Cui, Y. Wang, H. Wang, J. Liu, Overview of ai and communication for 6g network: Fundamentals, challenges, and future research opportunities, Science China Information Sciences (2025). doi:10. 1007/s11432-024-4337-1

  4. [12]

    H. Yang, A. Alphones, Z. Xiong, D. Niyato, J. Zhao, K. Wu, Artificial intelligence-enabled intelligent 6g networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.05744 (2019). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.05744

  5. [13]

    K. B. Letaief, Y. Shi, J. Lu, J. Lu, Edge artificial intelligence for 6g: Vision, enabling technologies, and applications, arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12444 (2021). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.12444

  6. [14]

    Z. Chen, Z. Zhang, Z. Yang, Big ai models for 6g wireless networks: Opportunities, challenges, and research directions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06250 (2023). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.06250

  7. [16]

    S. Yang, X. Zheng, J. Xu, J. Li, D. Song, Z. Chen, E. C. H. Ngai, Generative ai for vulnerabil- ity detection in 6g wireless networks: Advances, case study, and future directions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20488 (2025). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20488

  8. [17]

    I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, Y. Ben- 21 gio, Generative adversarial networks (2014). arXiv:1406.2661. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661

  9. [18]

    T. Qiao, J. Zhang, D. Xu, D. Tao, Learn, imagine and create: Text-to-image generation from prior knowledge, in: H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d 'Alch´ e-Buc, E. Fox, R. Garnett (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 32, Curran Associate...

  10. [19]

    M. A. Mohsin, Zero-shot learning via GANs and SAGANs: A performance analysis, in: 2023 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT), 2023, pp. 37–42. doi: 10.1109/FIT60620.2023.00017

  11. [20]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Liu, S. Zhou, J. Bian, J. Huang, X. Li, Z. Xin, Gan-based channel generation and modeling for 6g intelligent iiot communications, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 12 (14) (2025) 26472–26485. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2025.3561058

  12. [21]

    H. Huo, M. Fu, X. Liu, B. Zheng, Dcc-gan-based channel emulator for underwater wire- less optical communication systems, Frontiers in Marine Science Volume 10 - 2023 (2023). doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1149895. URL https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/marine-science/articles/10.338...

  13. [22]

    F. D. Mattia, P. Galeone, M. D. Simoni, E. Ghelfi, A survey on gans for anomaly detection (2021). arXiv:1906.11632. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.11632

  14. [23]

    M. Ring, D. Schl¨ or, D. Landes, A. Hotho, Flow-based network traffic generation using generative adversarial networks, Computers & Security 82 (2019) 156–172. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cose.2018.12.012. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404818308393

  15. [24]

    D. P. Kingma, M. Welling, Auto-encoding variational bayes, arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114 (2013). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114

  16. [25]

    D. J. Rezende, S. Mohamed, Stochastic backpropagation and approximate inference in deep generative models, arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.4082 (2014). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.4082

  17. [26]

    M. Baur, B. Bock, N. Turan, W. Utschick, Variational autoencoder for channel estimation: Real-world measurement insights, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.03450 (2023). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.03450

  18. [27]

    doi:10.1109/MCOM.2019.1800635

  19. [28]

    Y. Bo, Y. Duan, S. Shao, M. Tao, Joint coding-modulation for digital semantic communications via variational autoencoder, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06690 (2023). doi:10.48550/arXiv.2310.06690. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06690

  20. [29]

    Minnen, J

    D. Minnen, J. Ball´ e, G. Toderici, Joint autoregressive and hierarchical priors for learned image com- pression, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2018, pp. 10794–10803. URL https://papers.neurips.cc/paper/8275-joint-autoregressive-and-hierarchi...

  21. [30]

    J. Shin, Y. Kang, Y.-S. Jeon, Vector quantization for deep-learning-based csi feedback in massive mimo systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07355 (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.07355 22

  22. [31]

    Q. Li, Z. Xiang, P. Ren, Variational autoencoder based receiver for orthogonal time frequency space modulation, Digital Signal Processing 117 (2021) 103170. doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103170. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103170

  23. [32]

    J. Ho, A. Jain, P. Abbeel, Denoising diffusion probabilistic models, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239

  24. [33]

    Sohl-Dickstein, E

    J. Sohl-Dickstein, E. A. Weiss, N. Maheswaranathan, S. Ganguli, Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2015. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.03585

  25. [34]

    Nichol, P

    A. Nichol, P. Dhariwal, Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.09672 (2021). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.09672

  26. [35]

    Dhariwal, A

    P. Dhariwal, A. Nichol, Diffusion models beat GANs on image synthesis, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05233

  27. [36]

    Y. Song, S. Ermon, Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.05600

  28. [37]

    Y. Song, J. Sohl-Dickstein, D. P. Kingma, A. Kumar, S. Ermon, B. Poole, Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations, in: International Conference on Learning Repre- sentations, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.13456

  29. [38]

    Tashiro, J

    Y. Tashiro, J. Song, S. Ermon, CSDI: Conditional score-based diffusion models for probabilistic time series imputation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03502 (2021). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03502

  30. [39]

    J. Ho, T. Salimans, Classifier-free diffusion guidance, arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598 (2022). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.12598

  31. [40]

    Karras, M

    T. Karras, M. Aittala, T. Aila, S. Laine, Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00364

  32. [41]

    Vaswani, N

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, I. Polosukhin, Attention is all you need, arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03762 (2017). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762

  33. [42]

    T. B. Brown, B. Mann, N. Ryder, M. Subbiah, J. Kaplan, P. Dhariwal, A. Neelakantan, P. Shyam, G. Sastry, et al., Language models are few-shot learners, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165

  34. [43]

    Ouyang, J

    L. Ouyang, J. Wu, X. Jiang, D. Almeida, C. L. Wainwright, P. Mishkin, C. Zhang, S. Agarwal, K. Slama, A. Ray, J. Schulman, et al., Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. URL https://proc...

  35. [44]

    Achiam, S

    OpenAI, J. Achiam, S. Adler, S. Agarwal, et al., Gpt-4 technical report, arXiv preprint 23 arXiv:2303.08774 (2023). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774

  36. [45]

    Touvron, L

    H. Touvron, L. Martin, K. Stone, P. Albert, A. Almahairi, Y. Babaei, N. Bashlykov, S. Batra, P. Bhargava, S. Bhosale, et al., Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09288 (2023). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09288

  37. [46]

    G. O. Boateng, P. K. Jayaraman, et al., A survey on large language models for communication networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19823 (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19823

  38. [47]

    Liang, H

    L. Liang, H. Ye, Y. Sheng, O. Wang, J. Wang, S. Jin, G. Y. Li, Large language models for wireless communications: From adaptation to autonomy, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21524 (2025). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.21524

  39. [48]

    W. Lee, J. Park, Llm-empowered resource allocation in wireless communications systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02944 (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02944

  40. [49]

    M. A. Mohsin, A. Bilal, S. Bhattacharya, J. M. Cioffi, Retrieval augmented generation with multi- modal LLM framework for wireless environments, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Confer- ence on Communications (ICC), Montreal, Canada, 2025, also available as open-acces...

  41. [50]

    Cheng, W

    J. Cheng, W. Chen, J. Xu, Y. Guo, L. Li, B. Ai, Swin transformer-based csi feedback for massive mimo, arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.06435 (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06435

  42. [51]

    Tian, et al., Multimodal transformers for wireless communications, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11811 (2023)

    Y. Tian, et al., Multimodal transformers for wireless communications, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11811 (2023). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.11811

  43. [52]

    M. Umer, M. A. Mohsin, A. Ul-Hasan, F. Shafait, Pyramidtabnet: Transformer-based table recog- nition in image-based documents, in: G. A. Fink, R. Jain, K. Kise, R. Zanibbi (Eds.), Document Analysis and Recognition - ICDAR 2023, Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2023, pp. 420–437

  44. [53]

    Cao, et al., Tempo: Prompt-based generative pre-trained transformer for time series, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04948 (2023)

    D. Cao, et al., Tempo: Prompt-based generative pre-trained transformer for time series, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.04948 (2023). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04948

  45. [54]

    Bonomi, R

    F. Bonomi, R. Milito, J. Zhu, S. Addepalli, Fog computing and its role in the internet of things, in: Proceedings of the First MCC Workshop on Mobile Cloud Computing, ACM, 2012, pp. 13–16. doi:10.1145/2342509.2342513. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2342509.2342513

  46. [55]

    Y. Mao, C. You, J. Zhang, K. Huang, K. B. Letaief, A survey on mobile edge computing: The communication perspective, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 19 (4) (2017) 2322–2358. doi:10.1109/COMST.2017.2745201. URL https://ira.lib.polyu.edu.hk/bitstream/10397/96185/1/Survey...

  47. [56]

    rep., ETSI White Paper No

    Mobile edge computing, a key technology towards 5g, Tech. rep., ETSI White Paper No. 11 (2015). URL https://www.etsi.org/images/files/ETSIWhitePapers/etsi_wp11_mec_a_key_ technology_towards_5g.pdf

  48. [57]

    Y. Kang, J. Hauswald, C. Gao, A. Rovinski, T. N. Mudge, J. Mars, L. Tang, Neurosurgeon, collabo- 24 rative intelligence between the cloud and mobile edge, in: Proceedings of ASPLOS 2017, ACM, 2017, pp. 615–629. doi:10.1145/3037697.3037698. URL https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/30...

  49. [58]

    Kairouz, H

    P. Kairouz, H. B. McMahan, et al., Advances and open problems in federated learning, Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning 14 (1) (2021) 1–210. doi:10.1561/2200000083. URL https://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/MAL-083

  50. [59]

    E. J. Hu, Y. Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y. Li, L. Wang, W. Chen, Lora, low rank adaptation of large language models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685 (2021). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09685

  51. [60]

    Salimans, J

    T. Salimans, J. Ho, Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00512 (2022). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.00512

  52. [61]

    Y. Song, C. Meng, S. Ermon, Consistency models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.01469 (2023). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.01469

  53. [62]

    J. Heek, D. Choi, et al., Multistep consistency models, arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.06807 (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.06807

  54. [63]

    Zhong, M

    R. Zhong, M. Zhang, K. B. Letaief, Enabling distributed generative artificial intelligence in 6g, mobile edge generation, IEEE Internet of Things JournalPreprint (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05870

  55. [64]

    Lin, W.-M

    J. Lin, W.-M. Chen, Y. Lin, J. Cohn, C. Gan, S. Han, Mcunet: Tiny deep learning on iot devices, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/file/86c51678350f656dcc7f490a43946ee5-Paper. pdf

  56. [65]

    M. M. Amiri, D. G¨ und¨ uz, Federated learning over wireless fading channels, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 19 (5) (2020) 3546–3557. doi:10.1109/TWC.2020.2974748. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09769

  57. [66]

    G. Zhu, Y. Wang, K. Huang, Broadband analog aggregation for low latency federated edge learning, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 19 (1) (2020) 491–506. doi:10.1109/TWC.2019. 2946245

  58. [67]

    Zhu, Y.-F

    G. Zhu, Y.-F. Xu, K. Huang, Q. Yin, J. Zeng, P. You, One bit over the air aggregation for commu- nication efficient federated learning, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 20 (3) (2021) 1935–1949. doi:10.1109/TWC.2020.3039309

  59. [68]

    Nishio, R

    T. Nishio, R. Yonetani, Client selection for federated learning with heterogeneous resources in mobile edge, in: Proceedings of ICC 2019 Workshops, 2019. arXiv:1804.08333. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.08333

  60. [69]

    S. Wang, T. Tuor, T. Salonidis, K. K. Leung, C. Makaya, T. He, K. Chan, Adaptive federated learning in resource constrained edge computing systems, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 37 (6) (2019) 1205–1221. doi:10.1109/JSAC.2019.2904348

  61. [70]

    X. Duan, J. Wang, N. British, X. Zhang, M. Chen, K. Xu, Combined federated and split learning in edge computing for ubiquitous intelligence in iot, Sensors 22 (16) (2022) 5983. doi:10.3390/ s22165983. URL https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/16/5983

  62. [71]

    H. Xing, O. Simeone, S. Bi, Decentralized federated learning via sgd over wireless d2d networks, arXiv 25 preprint arXiv:2002.12507 (2020). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.12507

  63. [72]

    Z. Yang, M. Chen, K.-K. Wong, H. V. Poor, S. Cui, Federated learning for 6g: Applications, challenges, and opportunities, China Communications 19 (8) (2022) 144–166. doi:10.23919/JCC.2022.08.012. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.01338

  64. [73]

    Abualigah, D

    L. Abualigah, D. Yousri, M. Abd Elaziz, et al., Swarm intelligence to face iot challenges, Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience (2023). doi:10.1155/2023/5593103. URL https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10241578/

  65. [74]

    X. Zhao, L. You, R. Cao, Y. Shao, L. Fu, Broadband digital over-the-air computation for asynchronous federated edge learning (2021). arXiv:2111.10508. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.10508

  66. [75]

    Bhattacharya, K

    S. Bhattacharya, K. Rajabalifardi, M. A. Mohsin, J. M. Cioffi, Optimum power-subcarrier allocation and time-sharing in multicarrier noma uplink, in: ICASSP 2025 - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2025, pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109...

  67. [76]

    Q. Wu, S. Zhang, B. Zheng, C. You, R. Zhang, Intelligent reflecting surface-aided wireless com- munications: A tutorial, IEEE Transactions on Communications 69 (5) (2021) 3313–3351. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2021.3051897. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2021.3051897

  68. [77]

    Di Renzo, A

    M. Di Renzo, A. Zappone, M. Debbah, M.-S. Alouini, C. Yuen, J. de Rosny, S. Tretyakov, Smart radio environments empowered by reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: How it works, state of research, and road ahead, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 38 (11) (2020) 24...

  69. [78]

    M. Umer, M. A. Mohsin, M. Gidlund, H. Jung, S. A. Hassan, Analysis of STAR-RIS-assisted downlink CoMP-NOMA multi-cell networks under nakagami- m fading, IEEE Communications Letters 28 (5) (2024) 1009–1013. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2024.3374456

  70. [79]

    C. Pan, H. Ren, K.-K. Wang, W. Xu, M. Elkashlan, A. Nallanathan, L. Hanzo, Reconfigurable intelli- gent surfaces for 6g systems: Principles, applications, and research directions, IEEE Communications Surveys & TutorialsPreprint (2020). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.04300

  71. [80]

    M. Umer, M. A. Mohsin, S. A. Hassan, H. Jung, H. Pervaiz, Performance analysis of STAR-RIS enhanced CoMP-NOMA multi-cell networks, in: Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2023, pp. 2000–2005. doi:10.1109/GCWkshps58843.2023.10464446

  72. [81]

    D. Wang, A. Bazzi, M. Chafii, Ris-enabled integrated sensing and communication for 6g systems (2023). arXiv:2401.00444. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00444

  73. [82]

    M. Umer, M. A. Mohsin, A. Mahmood, K. Dev, H. Jung, M. Gidlund, S. A. Hassan, Deep re- inforcement learning for trajectory and phase shift optimization of aerial ris in comp-noma net- works, in: GLOBECOM 2024 - 2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2024, pp. 79–84. doi:1...

  74. [83]

    X. Pei, H. Yin, L. Tan, L. Cao, Z. Li, K. Wang, K. Zhang, E. Bj¨ ornson, RIS-aided wireless commu- nications: Prototyping, adaptive beamforming, and indoor/outdoor field trials, IEEE Transactions 26 on Communications 69 (12) (2021) 8627–8640, open-access preprint: https://arxi...

  75. [84]

    H. Zhou, H. Yin, X. Pei, Z. Li, K. Zhang, K. Wang, E. Bj¨ ornson, A survey on model-based, heuristic, and machine learning optimization for RIS, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (2024). doi: 10.1109/COMST.2023.3340099. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2023.3340099

  76. [85]

    Zhou, et al., Conditional GAN empowered channel estimation and pilot design for RIS-assisted sensing and communication, arXiv preprint (2025)

    Y. Zhou, et al., Conditional GAN empowered channel estimation and pilot design for RIS-assisted sensing and communication, arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:2502.17128. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17128

  77. [86]

    Y. Wang, Y. Xu, C. Zhang, Z. Chen, X. Ou, M. Dai, M. Tao, W. Zhang, Channel estimation for ris-assisted mmwave systems via diffusion models, arXiv preprint (2025). arXiv:2506.07770. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07770

  78. [87]

    M. A. Mohsin, S. M. Jameel, H. Rizwan, M. Iqbal, T. Ashraf, J.-Y. Pan, Transformer-based distributed machine learning for downlink channel estimation in ris-aided networks, in: 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Workshops (ICASSPW), ...

  79. [88]

    Bhattacharya, M

    S. Bhattacharya, M. A. Mohsin, K. Rajabalifardi, J. M. Cioffi, Successive interference cancellation- aided diffusion models for joint channel estimation and data detection in low rank channel scenarios, in: ICASSP 2025 - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech ...

  80. [89]

    F. C. Okogbaa, et al., Design and application of intelligent reflecting surface for 5g and beyond: A survey, Sensors 22 (7) (2022) 2699. doi:10.3390/s22072699. URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9003338/

  81. [90]

    3GPP, Solutions for nr to support non terrestrial networks (ntn), Tech. Rep. TR 38.821 V16.0.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) (2019). URL https://www.atis.org/wp-content/uploads/3gpp-documents/Specs/38-series/ 38821-f00.pdf

  82. [91]

    X. Lin, S. Rommer, S. Euler, E. A. Yavuz, R. S. Karlsson, 5g from space: An overview of 3gpp non terrestrial networks, IEEE Communications Standards Magazine 5 (4) (2021) 147–153. doi: 10.1109/MCOMSTD.011.2100038. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.011.2100038

  83. [92]

    M. M. Azari, S. Solanki, S. Chatzinotas, O. Kodheli, H. Sallouha, A. Colpaert, J. F. Mendoza Mon- toya, S. Pollin, A. Haqiqatnejad, A. Mostaani, E. Lagunas, B. Ottersten, Evolution of non terrestrial networks from 5g to 6g: A survey, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 24 ...

  84. [93]

    E. Juan, M. Lauridsen, J. Wigard, P. Mogensen, 5g new radio mobility performance in leo based non terrestrial networks, in: 2020 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2020, pp. 1–6. doi: 27 10.1109/GCWkshps50303.2020.9367419. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/GCWkshps50303.2020.9367419

  85. [94]

    Guidotti, A

    A. Guidotti, A. Vanelli-Coralli, A. Mengali, S. Cioni, Architectures, standardisation, and procedures for 5g satellite communications: A survey, Computer Networks 183 (2021) 107461. doi:10.1016/j. comnet.2020.107461. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S13891...

  86. [95]

    Guidotti, A

    A. Guidotti, A. Vanelli-Coralli, A. Mengali, S. Cioni, Non terrestrial networks: Link budget analysis, in: ICC 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2020, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/ICC40277.2020.9149179. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC40277.2020.9149179

  87. [96]

    E. Juan, M. Lauridsen, J. Wigard, P. Mogensen, Handover solutions for 5g low earth orbit satellite networks, IEEE Access 10 (2022) 93309–93325. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3203189. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3203189

  88. [97]

    Kodheli, N

    O. Kodheli, N. Maturo, S. Chatzinotas, S. Andrenacci, F. Zimmer, Nb iot via leo satellites, an efficient resource allocation strategy for uplink data transmission, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9 (7) (2022) 5094–5107. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2021.3135060. URL https://doi.org/10.110...

  89. [98]

    M. Umer, M. A. Mohsin, A. A. Nasir, H. Abou-Zeid, S. A. Hassan, Intelligent spectrum sharing in inte- grated tn-ntns: A hierarchical deep reinforcement learning approach, IEEE Wireless Communications 32 (3) (2025) 64–71. doi:10.1109/MWC.001.2400421

  90. [99]

    M. A. Mohsin, H. Rizwan, M. Jazib, M. Iqbal, M. Bilal, T. Ashraf, M. F. Khan, J.-Y. Pan, Deep reinforcement learning optimized intelligent resource allocation in active ris-integrated tn-ntn net- works, in: 2025 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 20...

  91. [100]

    M. Umer, M. A. Mohsin, A. Kaushik, Q. U. A. Nadeem, A. A. Nasir, S. A. Hassan, Reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted aerial nonterrestrial networks, an intelligent synergy with deep reinforce- ment learning, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine 20 (1) (2025) 55–64. doi:10....

  92. [101]

    H. Cai, C. Gan, S. Han, Once for all: Train one network and specialize it for efficient deployment, in: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2020. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=HylxE1HKwS

  93. [102]

    Strubell, A

    E. Strubell, A. Ganesh, A. McCallum, Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP, in: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2019, pp. 3645–3650. doi:10.18653/v1/P19-1355. URL https://aclanthology.org/P19-1355/

  94. [103]

    Hayes, L

    J. Hayes, L. Melis, G. Danezis, E. D. Cristofaro, Logan: Membership inference attacks against gener- ative models (2018). arXiv:1705.07663. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07663

  95. [104]

    Dettmers, A

    T. Dettmers, A. Pagnoni, A. Holtzman, L. Zettlemoyer, QLoRA: Efficient finetuning of quantized LLMs, in: Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023. URL https://openreview.net/forum?id=OUIFPHEgJU

  96. [105]

    Abadi, A

    M. Abadi, A. Chu, I. Goodfellow, H. B. McMahan, I. Mironov, K. Talwar, L. Zhang, Deep learning with differential privacy, in: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and 28 Communications Security (CCS), 2016, pp. 308–318. doi:10.1145/2976749.2978318. URL htt...

  97. [106]

    Carlini, J

    N. Carlini, J. Hayes, M. Nasr, M. Jagielski, V. Sehwag, F. Tram` er, B. Balle, D. Ippolito, E. Wallace, Extracting training data from diffusion models (2023). arXiv:2301.13188. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.13188

  98. [107]

    S. P. Karimireddy, S. Kale, M. Mohri, S. J. Reddi, S. Stich, A. T. Suresh, Scaffold: Stochastic controlled averaging for federated learning, in: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Vol. 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 2...

  99. [108]

    H. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, B. A. y Arcas, Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data, in: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), Vol. 54 of Proceedings of Machine...

  100. [109]

    URL https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.3172-201906-I

    ITU-T, Architectural framework for machine learning in future networks including imt-2020 (2019). URL https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.3172-201906-I

  101. [110]

    T. Li, A. K. Sahu, M. Zaheer, M. Sanjabi, A. Talwalkar, V. Smith, Federated optimization in hetero- geneous networks (2020). arXiv:1812.06127. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06127

  102. [111]

    rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology (2023)

    NIST, Artificial intelligence risk management framework (ai rmf 1.0), Tech. rep., National Institute of Standards and Technology (2023). URL https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework 29

  103. [112]

    O-RAN ALLIANCE, Ai/ml workflow description and requirements, Tech. Rep. O-RAN.WG2.AIML- MLF-v02.00, O-RAN Alliance (2022). URL https://www.o-ran.org/specifications

  104. [2672]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2022.3199901

    doi:10.1109/COMST.2022.3199901. URL https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2022.3199901

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.