Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 27 references

Hyper-spectral Imaging with Up-Converted Mid-Infrared Single-Photons

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A photon-pair imaging system records mid-infrared absorption spectra of polymers and biological samples using roughly 40,000 infrared photons per second and room-temperature silicon detectors.

desk verdict A credible room-temperature MIR single-photon hyperspectral imaging demo with a genuine noise-suppression trick, but the spectral calibration is fitted to FTIR and quantitative claims need error bars. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19970 v1 pith:T4WJZRHH submitted 2025-08-27 quant-ph physics.optics

Yijian Meng , Asbj{o}rn Arvad J{o}rgensen , Andreas N{ae}sby Rasmussen , Lasse H{o}gstedt , S{o}ren M. M. Friis , Mikael Lassen This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords mid-infraredhyperspectralimagingsingle-photondetectionspontaneousparametricdown-conversionfrequencyup-conversionsiliconSPADlabel-freebioimagingvibrationalspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims to have built a mid-infrared hyperspectral imaging system that can identify molecular bonds using extremely little light, about 40,000 mid-infrared photons per second, by generating time-correlated photon pairs and shifting the detection problem from the mid-infrared, where detectors are inefficient and often need cryogenic cooling, to visible and near-infrared wavelengths where room-temperature silicon single-photon detectors work well. The platform combines cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion with two nonlinear upconversion stages and coincidence gating to suppress classical intensity noise. It demonstrates chemically specific transmission images of polystyrene, polyethylene, egg yolk, and yeast across the 2.9–3.6 micrometer range, with absorption dips at O–H and C–H vibrational bands that match FTIR reference spectra. If the central claim is correct, label-free chemical imaging at single-photon flux becomes practical for delicate biological samples, without exogenous labels and without the usual detector bottleneck.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the cascaded nonlinear conversion chain built around two fan-out periodically poled lithium niobate crystals. The first crystal sits inside an optical cavity and performs SPDC, generating energy-correlated signal–idler photon pairs; the signal photon is upconverted inside the cavity to 609–650 nm, while the idler photon, tunable over 2.9–3.6 µm, interrogates the sample and is then upconverted in a second crystal to 780–849 nm. The coincidence gating between the two Si-SPADs is what suppresses classical intensity noise, and the specific correction identity used is Eq. (1), which rescales the upconverted idler count by the ratio of the average signal count to the simul

What would settle it

Place two independent standards with known, narrow mid-infrared absorption lines across 2.9–3.6 µm in the beam, for example a polymer film and a gas cell with well-established rovibrational transitions, run the full hyperspectral scan, and compare every measured peak position with the known values. If the linear calibration fitted to polystyrene does not place the second standard's peaks within the stated resolution, or if residuals grow toward the band edges, the spectral-assignment claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claim is that cavity-enhanced SPDC can act as a tunable, ultralow-flux mid-infrared illumination source for hyperspectral imaging when followed by two nonlinear upconversion steps and time-correlated detection. A pump photon is split inside an optical cavity into a near-infrared signal photon and a mid-infrared idler photon; the signal photon is upconverted to visible light and detected by one Si-SPAD, while the idler photon transmits through the sample, is upconverted to near-infrared light in a second nonlinear crystal, and is detected by a second Si-SPAD. Coincidence gating between the two detection arms suppresses uncorrelated background, and a correlation-based res

Load-bearing premise

The entire spectral axis of every sample is calibrated by a linear rescale fitted to a single polystyrene FTIR reference, with the same correction applied uniformly from 2.9 to 3.6 µm; if the true wavelength relation is nonlinear or sample-dependent, all reported O–H and C–H peak positions would shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Label-free mid-infrared chemical imaging becomes possible at roughly 2 fW of illumination, low enough to avoid photodamage in sensitive biological specimens.
  • Room-temperature Si-SPADs can replace cryogenic mid-infrared detectors, lowering system cost and operational complexity for hyperspectral imaging.
  • The 2.9–3.6 µm tuning window covers O–H, N–H, and C–H stretching vibrations, so the platform can in principle distinguish lipids, proteins, and water by intrinsic absorption without labels.
  • Coincidence-based rescaling pushes intensity noise toward the shot-noise limit at low photon flux, improving sensitivity in exactly the low-light regime where conventional MIR imaging struggles.
  • The demonstrated agreement with FTIR on polymer and biological samples indicates the single-photon spectra are quantitatively usable, not merely qualitative contrast maps.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves implicit is that the same room-temperature upconversion detection chain could be extended to other mid-infrared windows by redesigning the poling structures, potentially broadening chemical coverage beyond the demonstrated 2.9–3.6 µm band.
  • The paper notes that a megahertz pump laser could accelerate imaging by up to three orders of magnitude; a testable extension would check whether coincidence gating and correlation rescaling retain their noise suppression at those higher count rates.
  • The spectral calibration rests on a single polystyrene reference; an independent check with a second known standard across the full band would test whether the linear wavelength map holds for all samples, as the paper assumes.
  • Because egg yolk and yeast were already distinguished by O–H and C–H contrast, a natural next step is time-lapse metabolic imaging, tracking chemical composition changes over time if acquisition speed can be improved.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a mid-infrared hyperspectral imaging platform based on cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) followed by nonlinear up-conversion of both the NIR signal and the MIR idler photons, with detection by room-temperature Si-SPADs and time-correlated coincidence gating. The authors characterize the source, demonstrate correlation-based intensity-noise suppression, and present normalized transmission spectra and spatial contrast images of polystyrene, low-density polyethylene, egg yolk, and yeast over the 2.9–3.6 µm range. The central claim is chemically specific, label-free single-photon MIR hyperspectral imaging at roughly 40,000 MIR photons/s, with potential for low-perturbation biological imaging.

Significance. If substantiated, the system is a useful step toward practical room-temperature single-photon MIR imaging: it replaces cryogenic MIR detectors with Si-SPADs and uses the SPDC photon-pair correlation to reject classical background and excess intensity noise. The demonstration of hyperspectral contrast on biological and polymer samples at ~2 fW illumination is notable, as is the correlation-based rescaling in Eq. (1). The main weaknesses are the lack of an independent wavelength calibration and the absence of uncertainty quantification, both of which are directly load-bearing for the chemical-specificity and near-shot-noise claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Spectral calibration, Eqs. (2)–(3), Fig. 3b] The wavelength axis is assigned by fitting a three-parameter model (a, b, R) to a single polystyrene FTIR spectrum, and this correction is then applied uniformly to all samples. This does not establish that the fan-out poling position / upconversion phase-matching mapping is affine across the full 2.9–3.6 µm range, nor that the correction is sample-independent. The agreement with FTIR shown in Figs. 4–5 is therefore not an independent check. Please provide a direct calibration validation—e.g., multiple reference absorption lines spanning the range, or an independent wavelength probe—and report residuals/uncertainties. Without this, the O–H and C–H peak assignments in egg yolk and yeast (Fig. 5) could be systematically shifted.
  2. [Figs. 4–5 and Methods, Data Processing and Analysis] Transmission spectra and contrast images are presented without error bars or confidence intervals, despite the claim of near-shot-noise-limited operation. The noise-suppression evidence in Fig. 2 is quantified at selected wavelengths only. To support both 'near shot-noise-limited hyperspectral imaging' and 'strong agreement with FTIR,' the authors should propagate counting statistics and the calibration uncertainty into the displayed spectra, and provide a quantitative noise floor across the whole spectral range.
  3. [Hyperspectral imaging of Polymer samples; Methods] There is an inconsistency between the claimed spectral resolution and the actual sampling. The imaging scan uses 50 nm wavelength steps (20 planes over 2900–3600 nm), while the text claims ~8 cm⁻¹ spectral resolution. At 3 µm, 50 nm corresponds to ~55 cm⁻¹, which is much coarser than 8 cm⁻¹. The Methods statement '8 µm⁻¹' is a units typo (should be cm⁻¹). Please clarify the actual spectral bandwidth per point, the step size, and whether the 20-point hyperspectral cube can resolve the features claimed. If the underlying resolution is 8 cm⁻¹ but the sampling is 50 nm, the spectra are undersampled and the stated resolution is misleading.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 3b caption and text] The caption describes 'solid green trace' and 'dashed trace' but the text refers to 'grey line' and 'dashed orange line'. Please make the description consistent.
  2. [Fig. 4a text] Typo: 'polystyerene' should be 'polystyrene'.
  3. [Methods, Data Processing and Analysis] '8 µm⁻¹' should be '8 cm⁻¹'.
  4. [Author contributions] The contributions list 'Y.L.' and 'L.M.', but these initials do not match the author list. Please correct.
  5. [Eq. (1)] The superscript/subscript notation for N^c_up,s and N^c_up,i is not defined. Please define c as gated counts and clarify the averaging window.
  6. [Fig. 4e–h and Fig. 5e–h] The color scale for contrast images is not described. Please add a color bar and explain how the contrast metric is computed from the transmission images.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Wavelength calibration is fitted to an FTIR reference and the same reference is then used as validation; the imaging platform itself remains independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Results, 'Spectral calibration' (Eqs. 2–3, Fig. 3b); validation in 'Hyperspectral imaging of Polymer samples' (Fig. 4) and 'Hyperspectral imaging of egg yolk and yeast cells' (Fig. 5); Discussion]
    "To ensure more accurate spectral calibration, we employed a polystyrene (PS) standard reference sample. ... was aligned with the FTIR reference spectrum by calibrating the wavelength axis using a fitting function derived from the Beer–Lambert law. ... We fit ... to the FTIR reference spectrum using three free parameters: a, b, and R. ... the same set of wavelength correction was applied uniformly to all acquired spectra and images during the calibration process."

    The affine wavelength correction λ'=aλ+b and the exponent R are free parameters fitted to the polystyrene FTIR reference. This same calibration is then imposed on all spectra and images. Consequently, the later claims that 'the strong agreement with FTIR spectra confirms the fidelity of our measurements' and that single-photon spectra 'show good agreement with FTIR reference data' are not independent confirmations: the wavelength positions were adjusted to match the FTIR reference in the first place. The biological O–H/C–H peak assignments and the polymer peak positions therefore inherit the untested assumption that the correction is affine and uniform across 2.9–3.6 µm. The imaging contrast and correlation-based noise suppression do not depend on this calibration and remain independent ev

full rationale

The paper's central experimental demonstration—cavity-enhanced SPDC with upconversion, coincidence gating, noise suppression, and hyperspectral contrast images—does not reduce to its inputs and is not supported by a self-citation chain. The identified circularity is confined to the spectral-validation loop: the wavelength axis is calibrated with free parameters a, b, and R using a polystyrene FTIR spectrum, and the same FTIR-based comparison is subsequently offered as proof of spectral fidelity for polymer and biological samples. This makes the agreement in peak positions partially forced and leaves the affine, sample-independent calibration assumption untested. This is a real but partial circularity; it does not invalidate the image contrast or single-photon sensitivity claims. Score 4 accordingly.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central demonstration relies on standard nonlinear optics plus several domain assumptions about background subtraction, linear wavelength calibration, and common-mode noise normalization. The only explicit fitted quantities are the wavelength calibration coefficients and thickness-scaling parameters used to compare with FTIR.

free parameters (4)
  • Wavelength calibration slope a = not stated
    Linear wavelength correction lambda' = a*lambda + b fitted to FTIR reference (Eq. 2); applied uniformly to all spectra and images.
  • Wavelength calibration offset b = not stated
    Zero-order wavelength correction in Eq. (2); fitted to FTIR reference.
  • Absorption thickness exponent R = not stated
    Free parameter in Eq. (2) accounting for exponential thickness dependence; fitted to FTIR reference and used in FTIR comparison curves.
  • Sample thickness scaling (effective x or R*x) = not stated
    In Figs. 4-5, one free parameter accounts for the sample thickness variation when comparing single-photon spectra with FTIR.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Energy and momentum conservation in SPDC and SFG fix signal and idler wavelengths from the 1064 nm pump.
    Used in Fig. 1 insets and cascaded processes to relate pump, signal, and idler wavelengths.
  • domain assumption The measured count ratio (sample/reference) equals sample transmission after gating and reference normalization.
    Data Processing and Analysis: transmission is computed as the ratio of sample counts to reference counts; assumes background, dark counts, and drift are fully corrected.
  • domain assumption Beer-Lambert law with an effective thickness exponent describes absorption (Eq. 3).
    Used in spectral calibration and in rescaling FTIR comparison spectra; assumes homogeneous samples and linear absorption.
  • domain assumption The wavelength mapping is linear across the full 2.9-3.6 um range after applying lambda' = a*lambda + b, calibrated once on polystyrene.
    Spectral calibration; weakest assumption, because the same correction is applied to all samples and wavelengths.
  • domain assumption The signal channel is a faithful common-mode reference for intensity noise, so rescaling by Eq. (1) reduces noise without adding bias.
    Source characterization and Eq. (1); requires the signal and idler arms to share the same intensity fluctuations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hyper-spectral Imaging with Up-Converted Mid-Infrared Single-Photons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T4WJZRHH

@misc{pith2026250819970,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hyper-spectral Imaging with Up-Converted Mid-Infrared Single-Photons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T4WJZRHH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19970}
}
read the original abstract

Hyperspectral imaging in the mid-infrared (MIR) spectral range provides unique molecular specificity by probing fundamental vibrational modes of molecular bonds, making it highly valuable for biomedical and biochemical applications. However, conventional MIR imaging techniques often rely on high-intensity illumination that can induce photodamage in sensitive biological tissues. Single-photon MIR imaging offers a label-free, non-invasive alternative, yet its adoption is hindered by the lack of efficient, room-temperature MIR single-photon detectors. We present a single-photon hyperspectral imaging platform that combines cavity-enhanced spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) with nonlinear frequency up-conversion. This approach enables MIR spectral imaging using cost-effective, visible-wavelength silicon single-photon avalanche diodes (Si-SPADs), supporting room-temperature, low-noise, and high-efficiency operation. Time-correlated photon pairs generated via SPDC suppress classical intensity noise, enabling near shot-noise-limited hyperspectral imaging. We demonstrate chemically specific single-photon imaging across the \SIrange{2.9}{3.6}{\micro\meter} range on biological (egg yolk, yeast) and polymeric (polystyrene, polyethylene) samples. The system delivers high-contrast, label-free imaging at ultralow photon flux, overcoming key limitations of current MIR technologies. This platform paves the way toward scalable, quantum-enabled MIR imaging for applications in molecular diagnostics, environmental sensing, and biomedical research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.19970 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental setup for MIR single-photon hyperspectral imaging based on time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Characterization of noise reduction and stability enhancement via signal-idler corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Normalizing and calibrating the spectroscopy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mid-infrared (MIR) absorption analysis of polymers: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: MIR transmission analysis of biological samples: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Molecularpathologyviairandramanspectralimaging

    Max Diem, Antonella Mazur, Kathleen Lenau, Jen Schubert, Ben Bird, Milo Miljković, ChristophKrafft, andJürgenPopp. Molecularpathologyviairandramanspectralimaging. Journal of biophotonics, 6(11-12):855–886, 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Label-free biomedical optical imaging.Nature photonics, 17(12):1031–1041, 2023

    Natan T Shaked, Stephen A Boppart, Lihong V Wang, and Jürgen Popp. Label-free biomedical optical imaging.Nature photonics, 17(12):1031–1041, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Viewing life without labels under optical micro- scopes

    Biswajoy Ghosh and Krishna Agarwal. Viewing life without labels under optical micro- scopes. Communications Biology, 6(1):559, 2023. 10

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Vibrational biospectroscopy: from plants to animals to humans

    R Anthony Shaw and Henry H Mantsch. Vibrational biospectroscopy: from plants to animals to humans. a historical perspective. Journal of molecular structure, 480:1–13, 1999

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    Hydrogenbondingintheelectronicexcitedstate

    Guang-JiuZhaoandKe-LiHan. Hydrogenbondingintheelectronicexcitedstate. Accounts of chemical research, 45(3):404–413, 2012

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Mid-infrared metabolic imaging with vibrational probes.Nature methods, 17(8):844–851, 2020

    Lixue Shi, Xinwen Liu, Lingyan Shi, H Ted Stinson, Jeremy Rowlette, Lisa J Kahl, Christo- pher R Evans, Chaogu Zheng, Lars EP Dietrich, and Wei Min. Mid-infrared metabolic imaging with vibrational probes.Nature methods, 17(8):844–851, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Fundamental developments in infrared spectroscopic imaging for biomedical applications.Chemical Society reviews, 45(7):1935–1957, 2016

    Michael Pilling and Peter Gardner. Fundamental developments in infrared spectroscopic imaging for biomedical applications.Chemical Society reviews, 45(7):1935–1957, 2016

    1935

  8. [8]

    Vibrational spectroscopic mapping and imaging of tissues and cells

    Elizabeth A Carter, Koman K Tam, Robert S Armstrong, and Peter A Lay. Vibrational spectroscopic mapping and imaging of tissues and cells. Biophysical reviews, 1:95–103, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 27 references
  1. [9]

    Vi- brational spectroscopy for identification of metabolites in biologic samples

    Kevin V Hackshaw, Joseph S Miller, Didem P Aykas, and Luis Rodriguez-Saona. Vi- brational spectroscopy for identification of metabolites in biologic samples. Molecules, 25(20):4725, 2020

    2020

  2. [10]

    Spatially offset raman spectroscopy for biomedical applications.Chemical Society Reviews, 50(1):556–568, 2021

    Fay Nicolson, Moritz F Kircher, Nick Stone, and Pavel Matousek. Spatially offset raman spectroscopy for biomedical applications.Chemical Society Reviews, 50(1):556–568, 2021

    2021

  3. [11]

    Recent applications of quantitative analytical ftir spectroscopy in pharmaceu- tical, biomedical, and clinical fields: A brief review

    Khairi Mustafa Fahelelbom, Abdullah Saleh, Moawia MA Al-Tabakha, and Akram A Ashames. Recent applications of quantitative analytical ftir spectroscopy in pharmaceu- tical, biomedical, and clinical fields: A brief review. Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 41(1):21–33, 2022

    2022

  4. [12]

    Accurate and fast identification of minimally prepared bacteria phenotypes using raman spectroscopy assisted by machine learning.Scientific reports, 12(1):16436, 2022

    Benjamin Lundquist Thomsen, Jesper B Christensen, Olga Rodenko, Iskander Usenov, Rasmus Birkholm Grønnemose, Thomas Emil Andersen, and Mikael Lassen. Accurate and fast identification of minimally prepared bacteria phenotypes using raman spectroscopy assisted by machine learnin...

    2022

  5. [13]

    Circumventing photodamage in live-cell mi- croscopy

    Valentin Magidson and Alexey Khodjakov. Circumventing photodamage in live-cell mi- croscopy. Methods in cell biology, 114:545–560, 2013

    2013

  6. [14]

    Light-induced cell damage in live-cell super-resolution microscopy.Scientific reports, 5(1):15348, 2015

    Sina Wäldchen, Julian Lehmann, Teresa Klein, Sebastian Van De Linde, and Markus Sauer. Light-induced cell damage in live-cell super-resolution microscopy.Scientific reports, 5(1):15348, 2015

    2015

  7. [15]

    Advances in mid- infrared single-photon detection

    Stefano Dello Russo, Arianna Elefante, Daniele Dequal, Deborah Katia Pallotti, Luigi Santamaria Amato, Fabrizio Sgobba, and Mario Siciliani de Cumis. Advances in mid- infrared single-photon detection. InPhotonics, volume 9, page 470. MDPI, 2022

    2022

  8. [16]

    Advances in mid-infrared detection and imaging: a key issues review.Reports on Progress in Physics, 77(8):082401, 2014

    Manijeh Razeghi and Binh-Minh Nguyen. Advances in mid-infrared detection and imaging: a key issues review.Reports on Progress in Physics, 77(8):082401, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Sensing infrared photons at room temperature: from bulk materials to atomic layers.Small, 15(46):1904396, 2019

    Peng Wang, Hui Xia, Qing Li, Fang Wang, Lili Zhang, Tianxin Li, Piotr Martyniuk, Antoni Rogalski, and Weida Hu. Sensing infrared photons at room temperature: from bulk materials to atomic layers.Small, 15(46):1904396, 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Quantum imaging with undetected photons

    Gabriela Barreto Lemos, Victoria Borish, Garrett D Cole, Sven Ramelow, Radek Lap- kiewicz, and Anton Zeilinger. Quantum imaging with undetected photons. Nature, 512(7515):409–412, 2014. 11

    2014

  11. [19]

    Infrared spectroscopy with visible light.Nature Photonics, 10(2):98–101, 2016

    Dmitry A Kalashnikov, Anna V Paterova, Sergei P Kulik, and Leonid A Krivitsky. Infrared spectroscopy with visible light.Nature Photonics, 10(2):98–101, 2016

    2016

  12. [20]

    Microscopy with undetected photons in the mid-infrared

    Inna Kviatkovsky, Helen M Chrzanowski, Ellen G Avery, Hendrik Bartolomaeus, and Sven Ramelow. Microscopy with undetected photons in the mid-infrared. Science Advances, 6(42):eabd0264, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Room- temperature mid-infrared single-photon spectral imaging.Nature photonics, 6(11):788–793, 2012

    Jeppe Seidelin Dam, Peter Tidemand-Lichtenberg, and Christian Pedersen. Room- temperature mid-infrared single-photon spectral imaging.Nature photonics, 6(11):788–793, 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    Wide-field mid-infrared single-photon upconversion imaging.Nature communications, 13(1):1077, 2022

    Kun Huang, Jianan Fang, Ming Yan, E Wu, and Heping Zeng. Wide-field mid-infrared single-photon upconversion imaging.Nature communications, 13(1):1077, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Quantum entanglement and inter- ference at 3µm

    Zheng Ge, Zhao-Qi-Zhi Han, Fan Yang, Xiao-Hua Wang, Yin-Hai Li, Yan Li, Ming-Yuan Gao, Ren-Hui Chen, Su-Jian Niu, Meng-Yu Xie, et al. Quantum entanglement and inter- ference at 3µm. Science Advances, 10(10):eadm7565, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Video-rate, mid-infrared hyperspectral upconversion imaging.Optica, 6(6):702–708, 2019

    Saher Junaid, S Chaitanya Kumar, Morgan Mathez, Michael Hermes, Nicholas Stone, Neil Shepherd, Majid Ebrahim-Zadeh, Peter Tidemand-Lichtenberg, and Christian Pedersen. Video-rate, mid-infrared hyperspectral upconversion imaging.Optica, 6(6):702–708, 2019

    2019

  17. [25]

    Mid-infrared coincidence measurements on twin photons at room temperature.Nature communications, 8(1):15184, 2017

    M Mancinelli, A Trenti, S Piccione, G Fontana, Jeppe Seidelin Dam, Peter Tidemand- Lichtenberg, Christian Pedersen, and L Pavesi. Mid-infrared coincidence measurements on twin photons at room temperature.Nature communications, 8(1):15184, 2017

    2017

  18. [26]

    High-speed scanless entire bandwidth mid-infrared chemical imaging.Nature Communica- tions, 14(1):3929, 2023

    Yue Zhao, Shota Kusama, Yuji Furutani, Wei-Hong Huang, Chih-Wei Luo, and Takao Fuji. High-speed scanless entire bandwidth mid-infrared chemical imaging.Nature Communica- tions, 14(1):3929, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    PlasticTrace

    M Hermes, R Brandstrup Morrish, Laurent Huot, Lichun Meng, Saher Junaid, J Tomko, GR Lloyd, WT Masselink, Peter Tidemand-Lichtenberg, Christian Pedersen, et al. Mid- ir hyperspectral imaging for label-free histopathology and cytology. Journal of Optics, 20(2):023002, 2018. 12 ...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.