Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 111 references

Chemical abundances and doppler imaging of the Ap Si/He-wk star HD 100357

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Doppler images of iron and chromium on HD 100357 show ring-shaped depleted regions that the paper interprets as the signature of a magnetic dipole tilted about 90 degrees to the star's rotation axis.

desk verdict Careful abundance work on one more Ap star, but the headline Doppler-imaging ring is under-validated and should be treated as tentative. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20682 v1 pith:33KTYOIS submitted 2025-08-28 astro-ph.SR

Athul Dileep , Santosh Joshi , Sofya Alexeeva , Oleg Kochukhov , Eugene Semenko , Peter De Cat , Sebastián Zúñiga-Fernández , Otto Trust
show 6 more authors
Karen Pollard Lisa Crause Khalid Barkaoui Michaël Gillon Emmanuel Jehin Neeraj Rathore
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords chemicallypeculiarstarsApDopplerimagingabundanceanalysisTESSphotometrystellarmagneticfieldsHe-weakrotationalmodulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This study establishes HD 100357 as a hot Ap silicon/He-weak star and, more importantly, presents Doppler images of its surface that point to a magnetic field geometry. From TESS light curves the paper fixes the rotation period at 1.6279247 days and, with 20 high-resolution spectra, derives an effective temperature of 11,850 K, surface gravity of 4.57, and an axial inclination of 72 degrees. The abundance analysis finds silicon, iron-peak elements, and rare earths strongly overabundant while helium is about 2 dex below solar. The central new result is the Doppler map: iron and chromium show ring-shaped regions of lower abundance that encircle the star, and the authors argue these rings mark the magnetic equator of a dipole tilted roughly 90 degrees to the rotation axis. If this reading holds, abundance tomography can reveal magnetic geometry on stars before direct magnetic detection.

What carries the argument

Two ingredients carry the argument. The first is least-squares deconvolution, which co-adds many metal lines into high-S/N mean profiles so that rotational line-profile variations can be followed with only 20 moderate-S/N spectra. The second is the Doppler-imaging code InversLSD, which inverts the time-resolved Cr and Fe LSD profiles into surface maps of local line strength using a Milne-Eddington local line profile, a Voigt absorption profile, and square-root limb darkening. The product is the ring-shaped underabundance feature; its orientation relative to the stellar equator is the evidence from which the paper infers a magnetic axis tilted about 90 degrees to the rotation axis.

What would settle it

A decisive test is to observe the star spectropolarimetrically across a full rotation cycle. If the ring marks a dipole magnetic equator tilted about 90 degrees to the rotation axis, the measured longitudinal magnetic field should show a characteristic polarity reversal with a time-averaged value near zero; detecting no Zeeman signature above the noise would weaken the magnetic interpretation. Alternatively, re-running the Doppler inversion with the existing phase coverage but a fully stratified, depth-dependent local line profile would show whether the ring persists or is an artifact of the M

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that HD 100357 is a main-sequence chemically peculiar star of the Ap Si/He-wk type with Teff = 11,850 K, log g = 4.57, vsin i = 60 km/s, rotation period 1.6279247 d, and axial inclination 72 degrees. Its photosphere is strongly enriched in Si by about 0.8 dex, iron-peak elements by 1-2 dex, Sr and rare earths by 3-5 dex, and depleted in He by about 2 dex, with line-strength trends indicating vertical stratification of silicon. Restoring surface maps from time-resolved least-squares-deconvolved profiles of Cr and Fe with the InversLSD code, the paper finds that both elements are distributed in ring-shaped patterns of underabundance. Because these rings are i

Load-bearing premise

The ring-shaped iron and chromium maps are reliable only if the twenty observed spectra, which leave two rotational-phase gaps (roughly 0.28-0.33 and 0.63-0.84), plus the simplified Milne-Eddington local line-profile model, are enough to determine the surface distributions uniquely.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • HD 100357 should be added to the hot Ap, CP2-class stars whose surface chemical spots appear organized by a magnetic field, even though no Zeeman detection exists yet.
  • The Doppler maps give a specific spectropolarimetric prediction: a dipole-like field with its axis near 90 degrees to the rotation axis should produce a polarity-reversing longitudinal field signature over the 1.63-day rotation cycle.
  • Because the depleted rings coincide with the TESS light minima, photometric rotational modulation can serve as a phase-resolved tracer of surface abundance in future observations.
  • Silicon's abundance decreasing with line strength indicates vertical stratification with Si concentrated deeper in the atmosphere, a structure testable with stratified or NLTE model synthesis of the same lines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the ring pattern is stable across epochs, comparing Doppler maps taken years apart could constrain spot migration driven by magnetic obliquity on a star without a directly measured field.
  • Editorial inference: the same Doppler-imaging pipeline could be applied to other hot Ap/He-weak stars lacking detected magnetic fields; ring-like underabundances would act as a magnetic-field prospector, prioritizing targets for spectropolarimetry.
  • Editorial inference: the near-90-degree obliquity inferred here, if confirmed, is a useful datapoint for models of fossil-field evolution and magnetic braking in intermediate-mass stars, where such large obliquities are not the default outcome.
  • Editorial inference: the demonstrated contamination by a 4-magnitude fainter nearby star suggests that similar pixel-level companion screening should be applied to other chemically peculiar TESS targets before residual frequencies are attributed to pulsation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-wavelength study of the Ap Si/He-weak star HD 100357. It combines TESS and ground-based photometry, high-resolution spectroscopy from SALT, FEROS, and HERCULES, a detailed LTE abundance analysis, and Doppler imaging of Fe and Cr surface distributions. The authors determine Teff = 11,850 K, log g = 4.57, vsini = 60 km/s, inclination i = 72°, and a rotation period of 1.6279247 d. The abundance analysis finds overabundances of Si, iron-peak elements, and rare earths, and a strong He deficiency. Doppler imaging reveals ring-shaped regions of lower Fe and Cr abundance, which the authors interpret as possibly reflecting a magnetic field oriented ~90° to the rotation axis. The paper also carefully identifies and removes contamination from a nearby star in the TESS photometry.

Significance. If the Doppler-imaging ring is a genuine surface feature, the paper provides a valuable new datapoint for hot Ap stars: a well-characterized abundance pattern and a plausible magnetic-field-geometry indicator in a star that has not been detected spectropolarimetrically. The strengths of the paper are the careful treatment of TESS contamination using pixel masks and ground-based confirmation, the use of standard and publicly available analysis tools (ATLAS12, BinMag, InversLSD, VALD3), and the tabulated line-by-line abundances. The central DI result, however, is not yet demonstrated to be reliable, so the significance of the paper depends on the outcome of additional inversion validation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 5, Figs. 10-11] The central new result—the ring-shaped Fe/Cr underabundance maps and the inferred ~90° magnetic field orientation in Sec. 6—rests entirely on the InversLSD Doppler inversions. No synthetic recovery test, regularization sensitivity study, or error map is presented. The inversion uses only 20 LSD profiles with significant phase gaps (Table 3: no data between phases 0.628 and 0.839, and between 0.939 and 0.184), and the local line profile is a Milne-Eddington Voigt profile with square-root limb darkening. Given that ill-posed inversion with Tikhonov smoothing naturally produces smooth large-scale structures, a ring could be an artifact of the algorithm and phase sampling. The qualitative agreement with TESS light minima (Fig. 11) is a useful consistency check but cannot validate the map topology. I ask the authors to: (i) invert synthetic datasets with the same phase sampling and noise to d
  2. [Sec. 3.1 and Sec. 3.4] The effective temperature is not uniquely determined. Sec. 3.1 lists two photometric groups, Torig = 11,900 K and TAp = 11,070 K, and states 'we cannot exclude that the real Teff can be lower by about 1,000 K.' The spectroscopic refinement in Sec. 3.4 to 11,850 ± 150 K uses Hα/Hβ wings with a fixed log g = 4.57. Because Teff enters directly into the abundance analysis (Table 5), the LSD line masks, the radius and inclination (Secs. 3.2-3.3: R = 2.03 ± 0.10 R☉, i = 72° ± 11°), and the Doppler-imaging geometry, a 1000 K cooler model would propagate into all derived quantities. The quoted uncertainties in Table 5 include only line-to-line scatter, not this systematic. Please provide the abundance analysis for the alternative Teff scale, or a quantitative argument demonstrating that the Hα/Hβ wings exclude it. This is a load-bearing issue because the abundance pattern and the DI maps would s
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (1), Table 4, Abstract] The rotation period is given as 1.6279247(7) d in the abstract and Eq. (1), but Table 4 lists 1.6279294(7) d. Please harmonize.
  2. [Eq. (1), Table 4] The zero-point epoch is inconsistent: Eq. (1) gives BJDmax = 2458570.9785(3), while Table 4 lists t0 = 2458570.9743(4). Since rotational phases in Table 3 are computed from t0, this inconsistency affects the phase values used in the Doppler imaging.
  3. [Fig. 2] The bottom-panel axis label 'Resid' should be 'Residuals' for clarity.
  4. [Sec. 4.3 / Abstract] The abstract and conclusions describe 'stratified silicon,' but Sec. 4.3 states that a detailed stratification analysis is beyond the scope of the paper. The stratification claim is based on the line-strength trend in Fig. 8; please phrase this as a tentative detection.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: parameters, abundances, and Doppler maps are derived from independent observations; the ring result is an inversion output, not a re-labeled input.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. Teff, log g, vsini, and inclination are fitted to photometry and hydrogen-line wings; abundances are then fitted to line profiles with those fixed parameters, so the abundance pattern (including the Si stratification trend) is an output, not an input. The Doppler-imaging ring for Fe and Cr is reconstructed by InversLSD from phase-resolved LSD profiles; the TESS light curve is used only to set the ephemeris/rotation period and later as a qualitative cross-check ('the areas of relative underabundance for both elements coincide with the light minima'), so the ring is not fitted to the photometric minima and is not a renamed photometric result. The Milne-Eddington/Voigt local-profile ansatz is adopted explicitly as a forward model, not imported as a uniqueness theorem; any inadequacy would be a model-error or regularization-artifact concern, not circularity. The citations to Kochukhov et al. (2014, 2018, 2019, 2022, 2023) and Semenko et al. (2024) are method/tool citations and analogies to independent DI results on other stars; they do not supply the inference that HD 100357 has a ring, and the magnetic-field-orientation claim is explicitly hedged as 'hypothetical'/'presumably.' No equation or fitted parameter reduces by construction to the claimed result, so the paper has no significant circularity, even though the DI maps would benefit from synthetic-recovery validation (a correctness risk, not circularity).

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims depend on standard stellar parameter fitting (Teff, log g, v sin i, xi_mic, inclination) and on two key modeling assumptions: LTE spectral synthesis and a Milne-Eddington atmosphere for Doppler imaging. The only invented entity is a hypothetical magnetic field, which has no direct detection and therefore no independent falsifiable handle beyond the map geometry itself.

free parameters (7)
  • Effective temperature Teff = 11850 K (adopted; alternative 11070 K from photometry)
    Determined from hydrogen line wings and photometric calibrations; two groups of photometric values differ by about 1000 K, and the higher value is adopted for the analysis.
  • Surface gravity log g = 4.57 dex
    Fitted from hydrogen line wings and photometric calibrations; the paper notes it 'still appears overestimated'.
  • Projected rotational velocity v sin i = 60 km/s
    Fitted from the widths of LSD profiles; used to compute the inclination angle.
  • Microturbulent velocity xi_mic = 1.0 km/s
    Determined by minimizing the slope in the abundance-equivalent width relationship.
  • Inclination angle i = 72 deg
    Derived from v sin i, radius, and rotation period; has a large uncertainty of 11 degrees and is used as input to Doppler imaging.
  • Rotation period Prot = 1.6279247 d
    Fitted from TESS photometry with a multi-harmonic sinusoidal model and ephemeris fit.
  • Si stratification slope = linear trend in Si abundance vs line strength (not given numerically)
    A linear fit to individual Si II abundances as a function of line strength is used to infer vertical stratification.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption LTE assumption for abundance analysis
    The authors use LTE spectral synthesis with ATLAS12 models; NLTE effects for some lines (e.g., O I, Si II) are ignored, which could bias abundances.
  • ad hoc to paper Milne-Eddington atmosphere for Doppler imaging
    Local spectra in InversLSD assume a Milne-Eddington atmosphere with Voigt profiles and square-root limb darkening, an approximation that may not capture real line formation in Ap stars.
  • domain assumption Adopted solar reference abundances
    All [X/H] values compare against Lodders (2021) solar abundances; different solar scales would shift the absolute values though not the qualitative pattern.
  • domain assumption Companion star contributes only constant flux
    The visual companion (2.55 arcsec, G=12.35) is assumed to be non-variable and contributes a constant 5.7% flux; if it varies, the TESS light curve would be contaminated.
invented entities (1)
  • Hypothetical magnetic field
    purpose: Explains the ring-shaped Fe and Cr underabundance distribution and its orientation relative to the rotation axis.
    No direct spectropolarimetric detection is presented; the field is inferred from the geometry of abundance maps. The paper explicitly labels it 'hypothetical'.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chemical abundances and doppler imaging of the Ap Si/He-wk star HD 100357." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/33KTYOIS

@misc{pith2026250820682,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chemical abundances and doppler imaging of the Ap Si/He-wk star HD 100357},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/33KTYOIS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20682}
}
abstract

We present the results of time-resolved photometry, abundance analysis and Doppler imaging of an Ap star, HD 100357. The {\it TESS} photometry revealed rotational modulation with a period of 1.6279247 days. Upon inspecting the residuals after removing the rotational period and its harmonics, we found additional frequencies around 15.8054 d$^{-1}$ which we later confirmed with ground-based observations as originating from a nearby star. Using high-resolution spectroscopy, we identified HD 100357 as an Ap Si/He-wk star exhibiting rotational modulation caused by surface abundance spots. The stellar parameters of HD 100357 were determined as $T_{\rm eff}$ = 11,850 K, $\log g$ = 4.57, $\upsilon\sin i$ = 60 km\,s$^{-1}$, and an inclination angle $i$ = 72$^{\circ}$. The detailed abundance analysis revealed strongly overabundant stratified silicon, an overabundance of iron-peak elements and rare earth elements combined with remarkably deficient helium. Mapping of Fe and Cr abundances revealed the existence of ring-shaped regions with a lower concentration of the elements. Their geometry might reflect the orientation of the hypothetical magnetic field of the star, oriented $\sim$90$^{\circ}$ to the rotational axis. HD 100357, with its strong chemical peculiarities and indications of possible magnetic fields, represents an interesting candidate for follow-up spectropolarimetric observations aimed at investigating its magnetic field topology and stellar activity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20682 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The top panel displays a segment of the TESS light curve with a cadence of 120 seconds. The second panel shows the amplitude spectrum us￾ing the combined light curve from all TESS sectors. The inset in the second panel shows the frequency range from 12 to 18 d−1 , where contaminating signals in the residuals persist after fitting and eliminating 15 successive har￾monics of the fundamental rotational frequency. The t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top panel: The scattered points represent the LSD profile of HD 100357 obtained from SALT spectrum. The solid curve is the best-fit rotationally broadened line profile. The points in the middle, represented by cross symbols, are excluded from the line profile fit. Bottom Panel: The resid￾uals of the best-fit line profile to the observed LSD profile. Pakhomov et al. 2019). We avoided the broad Balmer lines and the in… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The scatter points represent iron abundances as a function of their equivalent widths for HD 100357. The solid straight line is the optimal min￾imised slope of this relationship at ξmic = 1 km s−1 . Theoretical spectra were computed assuming local thermo￾dynamic equilibrium (LTE) using this model atmosphere and atomic data obtained from the VALD3 database (Piskunov et al. 1995; Ryabchikova et al. 2015; Pakhomov et a… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the observed spectrum (black circles) and synthetic spectrum (red line) in the region of Hα (left panel) and Hβ (right panel). The telluric lines near the Hα region were excluded during the fitting. 4.14 4.12 4.10 4.08 4.06 4.04 4.02 4.00 logTeff (K) 1.4 …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Relative photospheric abundance of chemical species of HD 100357 at rotational phase 0.334. The horizontal line at zero denotes the solar reference. There is an excess of Si, Fe-peak elements, and heavier elements, accompanied by a deficiency of light elements and a pr…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Observed He I λ4471 Å (left panel) and He I λ5876 Å (right panel) line profiles for HD 100357 (black circles), compared to synthetic profiles (red and green lines). The red solid lines were obtained assuming the best He abundance A(He) = -3.1. The green dashed lines sh…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The scattered points indicate the individual Si abundances as a function of line strength in the atmosphere of HD 100357. The solid line represents a linear fit to the scattered data points, illustrating the declining abundance trend of Si with line strength, indicativ…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the observed LSD profiles (histograms) and DI model LSD profiles (solid lines) of Cr and Fe. The profiles for different rota￾tional phases are offset vertically. The phase values are shown to the right of the respective profiles. overabundant, ranging fro…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Surface distributions of Cr and Fe reconstructed with DI. The maps are given in terms of the logarithm of the local line strength. The star is shown at five rotational phases, indicated to the right of each column, at the inclination angle i = 72◦ . In each spherical …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The top two panels show the surface distribution of Cr and Fe, respectively, as a 2D plane, where the x-axis gives the rotational phase and the y-axis represent the latitude. The dashed line represents the -72◦ latitude below which the surface of the star is not visib…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  3. [3]

    Alecian G., 2018a, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/sty860 , 477, 2716

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty860

  4. [4]

    J., 2018b, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/sty3003 , 482, 4519

    Alecian G Stift M. J., 2018b, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/sty3003 , 482, 4519

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3003

  5. [5]

    N., et al., 2000, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000BASI...28..251A 28, 251

    Ashoka B. N., et al., 2000, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000BASI...28..251A 28, 251

    2000

  6. [6]

    Auri \`e re M., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...475.1053A 475, 1053

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078189 2007

  7. [7]

    D., Landstreet J

    Bailey J. D., Landstreet J. D., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220671 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...551A..30B 551, A30

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220671 2013

  8. [8]

    K., Kurtz D

    Baldry I. K., Kurtz D. W., Bedding T. R., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.00039.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.300L..39B 300, L39

    arXiv 1998

Show all 111 references
  1. [9]

    S., Koen C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AcA....71..113B 71, 113

    Baran A. S., Koen C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021AcA....71..113B 71, 113

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Bernhard K., H \"u mmerich S., Paunzen E., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa462 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.493.3293B 493, 3293

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    S., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316598 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000PASP..112..961B 112, 961

    Bessell M. S., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316598 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000PASP..112..961B 112, 961

    2000 doi

  4. [12]

    M., Tkachenko A., Van Reeth T., et al

    Bowman D. M., Tkachenko A., Van Reeth T., et al. 2022, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stac923 , 513, 526

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abf93c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...42B 254, 42

    Brandt T. D., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abf93c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..254...42B 254, 42

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

    1989 doi

  7. [15]

    Castelli F., 2005, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MSAIS...8...25C 8, 25

    2005

  8. [16]

    D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..102C 823, 102

    Choi J., Dotter A., Conroy C., Cantiello M., Paxton B., Johnson B. D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..102C 823, 102

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    M., et al., 2010, in Silva D

    Crawford S. M., et al., 2010, in Silva D. R., Peck A. B., Soifer B. T., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 7737, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III. p. 773725, @doi 10.1117/12.857000

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    Diaz-Cordoves J., Gimenez A., 1992, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992A&A...259..227D 259, 227

    1992

  11. [19]

    Dileep A., et al., 2025, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/staf361 , 538, 1747

    2025 doi

  12. [20]

    F., 1997, , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1997A

    Donati J.-F., Brown S. F., 1997, , http://cdsads.u-strasbg.fr/abs/1997A

    1997

  13. [21]

    Donati J.-F., et al., 2006, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10558.x , 370, 629

    2006

  14. [22]

    Dotter A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..222....8D 222, 8

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    G., Kurtz D

    Elkin V. G., Kurtz D. W., Nitschelm C., Unda-Sanzana E., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2009.00783.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.401L..44E 401, L44

    2010

  16. [24]

    V., Mason B

    Fabricius C., H g E., Makarov V. V., Mason B. D., Wycoff G. L., Urban S. E., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011822 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...384..180F 384, 180

    2002 doi

  17. [25]

    Fleck Jr. R. C., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/158225 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...240..218F 240, 218

    1980 doi

  18. [26]

    D., Folsom C

    Fr \'e our L., Neiner C., Landstreet J. D., Folsom C. P., Wade G. A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2104 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.520.3201F 520, 3201

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...616A...1G 616, A1

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2021, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A...1G 649, A1

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    J., Timmermans M., Pozuelos F

    Garcia L. J., Timmermans M., Pozuelos F. J., Ducrot E., Gillon M., Delrez L., Wells R. D., Jehin E., 2022, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stab3113 , 509, 4817

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    A., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sty1912 , 480, 2953

    Ghazaryan S., Alecian G., Hakobyan A. A., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/sty1912 , 480, 2953

    2018 doi

  24. [32]

    Giarrusso M., Cecconi M., Cosentino R., Munari M., Ghedina A., Ambrosino F., Boschin W., Leone F., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1488 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.514.3485G 514, 3485

    2022 doi

  25. [33]

    Gillon M., Jehin E., Magain P., Chantry V., Hutsem \' e kers D., Manfroid J., Queloz D., Udry S., 2011, @doi [ EPJ Web of Conferences] 10.1051/epjconf/20101106002 , 11, 06002

    2011

  26. [34]

    O., Corbally Christopher J., 2009, Stellar Spectral Classification

    Gray R. O., Corbally Christopher J., 2009, Stellar Spectral Classification

    2009

  27. [35]

    B., Barnes S

    Hearnshaw J. B., Barnes S. I., Kershaw G. M., Frost N., Graham G., Ritchie R., Nankivell G. R., 2002, @doi [Experimental Astronomy] 10.1023/A:1023770225275 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ExA....13...59H 13, 59

    2002 doi

  28. [36]

    P., 1975, University of Michigan Catalogue of two-dimensional spectral types for the HD stars

    Houk N., Cowley A. P., 1975, University of Michigan Catalogue of two-dimensional spectral types for the HD stars. Volume I. Declinations -90\_ to -53\_ 0

    1975

  29. [37]

    Jehin E., et al., 2011, The Messenger, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Msngr.145....2J 145, 2

    2011

  30. [38]

    C., 2015, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-015-9327-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JApA...36...33J 36, 33

    Joshi S., Joshi Y. C., 2015, @doi [Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy] 10.1007/s12036-015-9327-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015JApA...36...33J 36, 33

    2015 doi

  31. [40]

    L., Martinez P., Kurtz D

    Joshi S., Mary D. L., Martinez P., Kurtz D. W., Girish V., Seetha S., Sagar R., Ashoka B. N., 2006, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20064970 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...455..303J 455, 303

    2006 doi

  32. [41]

    L., Chakradhari N

    Joshi S., Mary D. L., Chakradhari N. K., Tiwari S. K., Billaud C., 2009, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912382 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...507.1763J 507, 1763

    2009 doi

  33. [42]

    K., Chakradhari N

    Joshi S., Ryabchikova T., Kochukhov O., Sachkov M., Tiwari S. K., Chakradhari N. K., Piskunov N., 2010, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15725.x , 401, 1299

    2010

  34. [43]

    Joshi S., et al., 2012, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21340.x , 424, 2002

    2012

  35. [44]

    Joshi S., et al., 2016, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527242 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...590A.116J 590, A116

    2016 doi

  36. [45]

    C., Sachkov M., Singh H

    Joshi S., Semenko E., Moiseeva A., Sharma K., Joshi Y. C., Sachkov M., Singh H. P., Yerra B. K., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stx087 , 467, 633

    2017 doi

  37. [46]

    Joshi S., et al., 2022, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stab3158 , 510, 5854

    2022 doi

  38. [47]

    Kaufer A., Stahl O., Tubbesing S., N rregaard P., Avila G., Francois P., Pasquini L., Pizzella A., 1999, The Messenger, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Msngr..95....8K 95, 8

    1999

  39. [48]

    Kervella P., Arenou F., Th \'e venin F., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A...7K 657, A7

    2022 doi

  40. [49]

    Y., Gvaramadze V

    Kniazev A. Y., Gvaramadze V. V., Berdnikov L. N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw889 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459.3068K 459, 3068

    2016 doi

  41. [50]

    Y., Gvaramadze V

    Kniazev A. Y., Gvaramadze V. V., Berdnikov L. N., 2017, in Balega Y. Y., Kudryavtsev D. O., Romanyuk I. I., Yakunin I. A., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 510, Stars: From Collapse to Collapse. p. 480 ( @eprint arXiv 1612.00292 ), @doi 10.48550/...

    2017 doi arXiv

  42. [51]

    914, Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag

    Kochukhov O., 2016, in Rozelot J.-P., Neiner C., eds, , Vol. 914, Lecture Notes in Physics, Berlin Springer Verlag. pp 177--204, @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-24151-7_9

    2016 doi

  43. [52]

    Kochukhov O., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629768 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...597A..58K 597, A58

    2017 doi

  44. [53]

    Kochukhov O., 2018, BinMag: Widget for comparing stellar observed with theoretical spectra , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1805.015 ( @eprint ascl 1805.015 )

    2018

  45. [54]

    Kochukhov O., Ryabchikova T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010726 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...374..615K 374, 615

    2001 doi

  46. [55]

    A., Sangalli L., Piskunov N., Landstreet J

    Kochukhov O., Bagnulo S., Wade G. A., Sangalli L., Piskunov N., Landstreet J. D., Petit P., Sigut T. A. A., 2004, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031611 , 414, 613

    2004 doi

  47. [56]

    Kochukhov O., Makaganiuk V., Piskunov N., 2010, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...524A...5K 524, A5

    2010 doi

  48. [57]

    Kochukhov O., L \"u ftinger T., Neiner C., Alecian E., MiMeS Collaboration 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423472 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A

    2014 doi

  49. [58]

    Kochukhov O., Shultz M., Neiner C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834279 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...621A..47K 621, A47

    2019 doi

  50. [59]

    Kochukhov O., Papakonstantinou N., Neiner C., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac066 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.5821K 510, 5821

    2022 doi

  51. [60]

    u rsoytrak Mutlay H., Amarsi A. M., Petit P., Mutlay I., G \

    Kochukhov O., G \"u rsoytrak Mutlay H., Amarsi A. M., Petit P., Mutlay I., G \"u rol B., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad720 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.3480K 521, 3480

    2023 doi

  52. [61]

    Krti c ka J., Mikul \'a s ek Z., L \"u ftinger T., Jagelka M., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425097 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...576A..82K 576, A82

    2015 doi

  53. [62]

    L., Nicolet B., 1997, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supplement] 10.1051/aas:1997291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&AS..122...51K 122, 51

    Kunzli M., North P., Kurucz R. L., Nicolet B., 1997, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supplement] 10.1051/aas:1997291 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&AS..122...51K 122, 51

    1997 doi

  54. [63]

    W., 2000, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.531 , 38, 531

    Kurtz D. W., 2000, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.531 , 38, 531

    2000 doi

  55. [64]

    Kurtz D., 2022, in Annual Conference and General Assembly of the. p. 1 ( @eprint arXiv 2201.11629 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2201.11629

    2022 doi arXiv

  56. [65]

    L., 2005, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MSAIS...8...14K 8, 14

    Kurucz R. L., 2005, Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana Supplementi, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MSAIS...8...14K 8, 14

    2005

  57. [66]

    L., Babusiaux C., Cox N

    Lallement R., Vergely J. L., Babusiaux C., Cox N. L. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142846 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...661A.147L 661, A147

    2022 doi

  58. [67]

    D., Bagnulo S., Andretta V., Fossati L., Mason E., Silaj J., Wade G

    Landstreet J. D., Bagnulo S., Andretta V., Fossati L., Mason E., Silaj J., Wade G. A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077343 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...470..685L 470, 685

    2007 doi

  59. [68]

    Lenz P., Breger M., 2005, @doi [CoAst] 10.1553/cia146s53 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005CoAst.146...53L 146, 53

    2005 doi

  60. [69]

    Lenz P., Breger M., 2014, Period04: Statistical analysis of large astronomical time series , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1407.009 ( @eprint ascl 1407.009 )

    2014

  61. [70]

    Lightkurve Collaboration et al., 2018, Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library ( @eprint Astrophysics Source Code Library 1812.013 )

    2018

  62. [71]

    Lodders K., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-021-00825-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021SSRv..217...44L 217, 44

    2021 doi

  63. [72]

    Martinez P., et al., 2001, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010432 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...371.1048M 371, 1048

    2001 doi

  64. [73]

    D., Wycoff G

    Mason B. D., Wycoff G. L., Hartkopf W. I., Douglass G. G., Worley C. E., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323920 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122.3466M 122, 3466

    2001 doi

  65. [74]

    Mathys G., 2017, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629584 , 601, A14

    2017 doi

  66. [75]

    L., Giarrusso M., Kurtz D

    Mathys G., Holdsworth D. L., Giarrusso M., Kurtz D. W., Catanzaro G., Leone F., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451437 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A.186M 691, A186

    2024 doi

  67. [76]

    C., Mermilliod M., Hauck B., 1997, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supplement] 10.1051/aas:1997197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&AS..124..349M 124, 349

    Mermilliod J. C., Mermilliod M., Hauck B., 1997, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics, Supplement] 10.1051/aas:1997197 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&AS..124..349M 124, 349

    1997 doi

  68. [77]

    Michaud G., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1086/150459 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970ApJ...160..641M 160, 641

    1970 doi

  69. [78]

    A., 2007, @doi [Communications in Asteroseismology] 10.1553/cia151s48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CoAst.151...48M 151, 48

    Miglio A., Montalb \'a n J., Dupret M. A., 2007, @doi [Communications in Asteroseismology] 10.1553/cia151s48 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007CoAst.151...48M 151, 48

    2007 doi

  70. [79]

    L., Bernhard K., Krti c ka J., Jan \' k J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243622 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A.159M 668, A159

    Mikul \'a s ek Z., Semenko E., Paunzen E., H \"u mmerich S., North P. L., Bernhard K., Krti c ka J., Jan \' k J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243622 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...668A.159M 668, A159

    2022 doi

  71. [80]

    E., Hatzes A

    Mkrtichian D. E., Hatzes A. P., Kanaan A., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.07002.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.345..781M 345, 781

    2003

  72. [81]

    Munari U., Zwitter T., 1997, Astronomy and Astrophysics, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&A...318..269M 318, 269

    1997

  73. [82]

    Napiwotzki R., Schoenberner D., Wenske V., 1993, Astronomy and Astrophysics, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A&A...268..653N 268, 653

    1993

  74. [83]

    M., North P., Hubrig S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810325 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...491..545N 491, 545

    Netopil M., Paunzen E., Maitzen H. M., North P., Hubrig S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810325 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...491..545N 491, 545

    2008 doi

  75. [84]

    Norris J., 1971, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/190255 , 23, 213

    1971 doi

  76. [85]

    V., Ryabchikova T

    Pakhomov Y. V., Ryabchikova T. A., Piskunov N. E., 2019, @doi [Astronomy Reports] 10.1134/S1063772919120047 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ARep...63.1010P 63, 1010

    2019 doi

  77. [86]

    Paxton B., Bildsten L., Dotter A., Herwig F., Lesaffre P., Timmes F., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..192....3P 192, 3

    2011 doi

  78. [87]

    Paxton B., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..208....4P 208, 4

    2013 doi

  79. [88]

    Paxton B., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..220...15P 220, 15

    2015 doi

  80. [89]

    Paxton B., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..234...34P 234, 34

    2018 doi

  81. [90]

    E., Kupka F., Ryabchikova T

    Piskunov N. E., Kupka F., Ryabchikova T. A., Weiss W. W., Jeffery C. S., 1995, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A&AS..112..525P 112, 525

    1995

  82. [91]

    W., 1974, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.aa.12.090174.001353 , 12, 257

    Preston G. W., 1974, @doi [Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1146/annurev.aa.12.090174.001353 , 12, 257

    1974

  83. [92]

    Richard O., Michaud G., Richer J., 2001, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/322455 , 558, 377

    2001 doi

  84. [93]

    R., Winn J

    Ricker G. R., Winn J. N., Vanderspek R., et al. 2015, @doi [JATIS] 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003 , 1, 014003

    2015 doi

  85. [94]

    I., Semenko E

    Romanyuk I. I., Semenko E. A., Kudryavtsev D. O., Moiseeva A. V., Yakunin I. A., 2013, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341313030063 , 68, 300

    2013 doi

  86. [95]

    R., Kochukhov O., Monier R., Wahlgren G

    Ryabchikova T., 2014, in Mathys G., Griffin E. R., Kochukhov O., Monier R., Wahlgren G. M., eds, Putting A Stars into Context: Evolution, Environment, and Related Stars. pp 220--228

    2014

  87. [96]

    W., Kochukhov O., St \"u tz C., 2004, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361:20035899 , 423, 705

    Ryabchikova T., Nesvacil N., Weiss W. W., Kochukhov O., St \"u tz C., 2004, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361:20035899 , 423, 705

    2004 doi

  88. [97]

    Ryabchikova T., Ryabtsev A., Kochukhov O., Bagnulo S., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065367 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...456..329R 456, 329

    2006 doi

  89. [98]

    L., Stempels H

    Ryabchikova T., Piskunov N., Kurucz R. L., Stempels H. C., Heiter U., Pakhomov Y., Barklem P. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/054005 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhyS...90e4005R 90, 054005

    2015 doi

  90. [99]

    Saio H., 2005, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09189.x , 360, 1022

    2005

  91. [100]

    Semenko E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2503 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.535.2812S 535, 2812

    2024 doi

  92. [101]

    A., Rivinius T., Sikora J., Oksala M

    Shultz M., Wade G. A., Rivinius T., Sikora J., Oksala M. E., Bohlender D., Neiner C., 2019, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/mnras/stz2476 , 490, 274

    2019 doi

  93. [102]

    A., Power J., Neiner C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2895 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.3127S 483, 3127

    Sikora J., Wade G. A., Power J., Neiner C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2895 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.3127S 483, 3127

    2019 doi

  94. [103]

    W., Pollard K

    Skuljan J., 2004, in Kurtz D. W., Pollard K. R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 310, IAU Colloq. 193: Variable Stars in the Local Group. p. 575

    2004

  95. [104]

    C., Stumpe M

    Smith J. C., Stumpe M. C., Van Cleve J. E., et al. 2012, @doi [PASP] 10.1086/667697 , 124, 1000

    2012 doi

  96. [105]

    Stibbs D. W. N., 1950, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/110.4.395 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1950MNRAS.110..395S 110, 395

    1950 doi

  97. [106]

    W., Winn J

    Sullivan P. W., Winn J. N., Berta-Thompson Z. K., et al. 2015, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/77 , 809, 77

    2015 doi

  98. [107]

    Torres G., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/140/5/1158 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....140.1158T 140, 1158

    2010 doi

  99. [108]

    O., Romanyuk I

    Tsymbal V., Ryabchikova T., Sitnova T., 2019, in Kudryavtsev D. O., Romanyuk I. I., Yakunin I. A., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 518, Physics of Magnetic Stars. pp 247--252

    2019

  100. [109]

    Tyas L. M. G., 2012, PhD thesis, Durham University, UK

    2012

  101. [110]

    Vauclair S., Vauclair G., 1975, A&A, 45, 233

    1975

  102. [111]

    L., Lallement R., Cox N

    Vergely J. L., Lallement R., Cox N. L. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243319 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...664A.174V 664, A174

    2022 doi

  103. [112]

    Zboril M., North P., 1997, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 318, 950

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.