Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 6 cited by

On W-algebras and ODE/IM correspondence

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read W-algebra eigenvalues reduce to WKB period integrals on x^K + y^N = 1

desk verdict Solid WKB machinery for W_N quantum KdV charges, but the all-order period-to-eigenvalue dictionary is calibrated at low order and the paper is honest about it; a strong conditional, not a proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20793 v1 pith:U4BWOMBZ submitted 2025-08-28 hep-th math-phmath.MPmath.QA

Matěj Kudrna , Tomáš Procházka This is my paper
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA MSC 81R1081T4034M60
keywords ODE/IMcorrespondenceW-algebrasquantumKdVhierarchyBetherootsWKBperiodsArgyres-Douglasminimalmodelsmirrorcurvetopologicalstring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the eigenvalues of the local conserved charges (quantum KdV Hamiltonians) of Virasoro, W3, and W4 algebras are period integrals of WKB 1-forms on the curve x^K + y^N = 1. Primaries are encoded in the differential operator's behavior at the origin, and descendants appear as Bethe roots that solve the trivial-monodromy condition; the WKB curve itself is unchanged. The identification between the ODE parameters and the CFT zero modes is fixed by matching the first few charges, and then the same formula produces the higher charges. If right, this gives a uniform route from one differential operator to the whole spectral data of the integrable structure, with dual descriptions of the same model agreeing.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the WKB curve W: x^K + y^N = 1, together with the tower of meromorphic 1-forms Y_n dx generated by the Riccati/WKB recursion. Periods are evaluated on lifts of the Pochhammer contour in the mirror curve t = x^K = 1 - y^N, a three-punctured sphere whose cycles carry the homology of W; the integrals reduce to Euler beta functions. The dictionary is completed by the normalization N_n and the identification of the Frobenius indices sigma_j of the differential operator at x = 0 with the zero modes a_j^(cyl) of the free-boson realization, and by the Bethe equations that fix the descendant singularities.

What would settle it

Take the non-self-conjugate primary Delta = -3/7 of the (W3, W4) model, where odd charges are nonzero, and compute the level-2 eigenvalues of I5 and I7 twice: once by direct diagonalization of the W4 modes, once by the period formula evaluated on the W4 Bethe roots. The paper predicts exact agreement; the first mismatch at such an uncompared charge would show that the Frobenius-index dictionary or the normalization factor N_n stops holding beyond the fitted low charges.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, on the paper's own terms, is a precise spectral dictionary. For an Argyres-Douglas minimal model viewed as W_N, the normalized eigenvalues P_n = N_n I_n of local integrals of motion are, up to a fixed triangular normalization, integrals of WKB 1-forms Y_n dx along a Pochhammer contour on the WKB curve x^K + y^N = 1. The primary is represented by the regular singular point at x = 0, and its Frobenius indices are identified with the cylinder-frame free-boson zero modes via sigma_j = sqrt(N(K+N)) a_j^(cyl); descendants are represented by additional apparent singularities whose locations are Bethe roots, fixed by requiring trivial local monodromy. Evaluating the periods yields

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that matching the first few charge values fixes the dictionary between the ODE's local exponents and the CFT's zero modes once and for all; the paper assumes this dictionary extends to all higher charges, and also to dual frames in which no explicit map between Bethe roots is known.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The spectral problem for the whole commuting family of local charges reduces to solving one ODE plus Bethe equations, so all higher charges of a state are fixed by the same Bethe roots rather than by independent matrix diagonalizations at each level.
  • Descendant states deform only the higher 1-forms, not the WKB curve, so the curve's geometry is a state-independent object for the theory.
  • Dual frames that look very different, such as W3 versus W4 or K versus K' under Feigin-Frenkel duality, produce identical periods, so the eigenvalues are triality invariant as the W-infinity algebra predicts.
  • In the large-K,N limit, ground-state eigenvalues are Bernoulli-number weighted and assemble into the MacMahon function's topological-string genus expansion, connecting CFT spectral data to a partition function.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If matching the lowest charges fixes the normalization uniquely, the sharpest open test is to compute the next uncompared charge from the period formula and from direct commutation relations; that test would confirm or break the dictionary beyond the fitted orders.
  • Because all period integrals collapse to beta functions on the mirror curve, the higher-genus WKB curve may be a convenience rather than a necessity; a twisted-cohomology formulation on the three-punctured sphere would plausibly give the same charges for arbitrary N without writing rank-N Bethe equations.
  • The finite list of primaries for which the Fourier-type K-N duality closes after conjugation by a pseudo-differential operator coincides with the irreducible modules; this closure condition could be used as a practical selector that removes the null-state solutions the Bethe equations also admit.
  • The MacMahon-function match is established for the ground state at leading orders; if it survives at subleading orders, the topological-string free energy would literally be a generating function of W_N ground-state Casimir energies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a systematic WKB/period-integral algorithm for computing eigenvalues of local integrals of motion in Virasoro and W_N algebras within the ODE/IM correspondence. For primary states, the dictionary identifies the Frobenius indices of the differential operator at x=0 with cylinder-frame free-boson zero modes (Eq. 5.27) and identifies normalized WKB periods with the local charges (Eq. 5.28), with the normalization N_n fixed by matching the lowest charges (Eqs. 2.46–2.50). Descendant states are encoded by Bethe roots controlling apparent singularities; explicit Bethe equations are derived for W_3 and W_4. The prescription is tested on Lee-Yang and (W_3,W_4) minimal models, including agreement with direct Virasoro mode-expansion diagonalization at several levels and agreement between the W_3 and W_4 descriptions of the same model, and the large–K,N limit is shown to reproduce the genus expansion of the MacMahon function.

Significance. If the all-order dictionary holds, the paper provides a powerful and explicit bridge between ODE spectral data and the spectra of quantum KdV/BLZ charges for W-algebras, including the first explicit W_4 Bethe equations. The computational work is extensive and largely reproducible: many results are cross-checked in two different W-frames and against direct mode-expansion diagonalization, and the MacMahon-function limit is a striking consistency check. The geometric interpretation of the WKB curve as a three-punctured sphere with Pochhammer cycles is elegant and unifies the period computations. The principal weakness is that the central identification P_n = N_n I_n is calibrated on the lowest charges and then assumed for all n; the higher-order checks all rely on the same dictionary, so they do not independently verify the all-order claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.1, Eqs. (5.26)–(5.28)] The all-order identity P_n = N_n I_n is established only for n = 1,...,4 by matching the explicit charges in Eq. (3.46). The normalization N_n in Eq. (5.18) and the Frobenius-index identification in Eq. (5.27) are both fixed by those low-order matches. All subsequent checks — including the W_3/W_4 examples in Section 7 and the MacMahon limit in Section 8 — use this same dictionary, so they do not independently validate the formula beyond the fitted orders. If the true map requires an n-dependent rescaling beyond N_n or a normal-ordering shift that first appears at n ≥ 5, Eq. (5.28) would fail while all present checks pass. The paper should either (a) prove the all-order statement by deriving a recursion showing that the WKB periods satisfy the same algebraic relations as the local charges, or (b) explicitly label P_n = N_n I_n as a conjecture and restrict the claims to the verified order
  2. [§7.1.3, §7.3] The paper states in Section 7.3 that it does not know an explicit map between Bethe-root solutions in Feigin–Frenkel dual frames, and the W_3/W_4 frame agreement is only demonstrated for the specific low-lying states checked. The abstract's claim of "complete agreement between the calculations in different triality frames" is therefore stronger than what is established. The agreement is certainly a non-trivial test in the cases examined, but the missing general map should be acknowledged in the abstract and conclusions, or the claim should be softened to "agreement in all cases tested."
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2.4, Eq. (2.51)] In the text following Eq. (2.51), the Frobenius indices are stated as "σ = −1 and σ = 24"; the second value should presumably be 2, not 24.
  2. [§8.1] The change of variables is written as "eX = xK+2" and "x = e X K+2", which is garbled. It should be e^X = x^{K+2}, X = (K+2) log x. Also the notation for the Hankel contour H should be defined before use.
  3. [§3.2] The phrase "these quantities are related to quantum intermediate long wave hierarchy" appears to be missing an article; should be "the quantum intermediate long wave hierarchy."
  4. [§7.1.1] At level 4 the two physical Bethe-root solutions are listed with numerical values; the text says the roots satisfy an irreducible polynomial but the connection between the two sets of four roots and the two eigenstates should be made more explicit (which of the 8 roots belongs to which state).

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Period-to-eigenvalue dictionary is partly calibrated on the CFT side: the normalization N_n and the Frobenius-index-to-cylinder-mode scale are fixed by matching low-order charges, so the all-order formula is an extrapolation, though higher-charge and W3/W4 checks give independent support.

  1. fitted input called prediction [§5.1, Eqs. (5.17)–(5.28)]
    "This exactly agrees with the primary charges calculated in (3.46) assuming that we identify e_k(σ_j) ↔ N^{k/2}(K+N)^{k/2}u_k^{(cyl)}. ... In other words, the Frobenius indices agree with free boson zero modes on the cylinder up to an overall rescaling, σ_j ↔ sqrt(N(K+N)) a_j^{(cyl)} ... With this identification we have P_n = N_n I_n."

    The all-order relation P_n = N_n I_n is not derived from the ODE side alone: the normalization N_n in (5.18) is chosen so that the normalized periods are rational, and the scale sqrt(N(K+N)) in (5.27) is fixed by requiring the displayed P_2, P_3, P_4 in (5.21)/(5.25) to match the CFT charges (3.46). Thus the equality at the lowest orders is by construction of the dictionary; using the same dictionary for all higher I_n is an extrapolation of the calibrated identification. This is partial calibration, not full circularity, because the higher charges and the W3/W4 cross-frame checks are evaluated independently and agree.

  2. fitted input called prediction [§2.2.3, Eqs. (2.46)–(2.50)]
    "Comparing these with the highest weight state eigenvalues of the quantities I_{2n−1} evaluated using commutation relations, we find the identification ... This completely fixes the relative normalization between the periods of Y_n(x)dx that we normalized in rather ad hoc way and the standard normalization of higher quantum KdV charges."

    At the Virasoro level the overall normalization between a WKB period and a CFT eigenvalue is fixed by comparing the first few period integrals with eigenvalues computed from the Virasoro commutation relations; equation (2.50) is inferred from the first three matches. The circularity is limited to the normalization/convention: the polynomial dependence in the periods (2.48) is independently reproduced by the Virasoro-mode calculation (2.23)–(2.25), so the functional content of the correspondence is not forced.

full rationale

The paper's central content is not equivalent to its inputs. The WKB periods are computed from the differential operator, and the CFT eigenvalues are computed independently from Virasoro/W∞ commutation relations; the matches at higher charges (e.g. I6, I7, I8), the W3/W4 cross-frame agreement in Section 7, and the large-rank limits are genuine checks. The main caveat is that the dictionary between ODE parameters and CFT data, especially the scale in (5.27) and the normalization in (5.18), is calibrated on the lowest charges and then used all-order; this makes the all-order formula an extrapolation of a fitted ansatz. The paper openly states the ad hoc normalization and the fact that one can fix normalization by comparing a single eigenvalue, so this is a transparency issue and partial calibration rather than a hidden reduction by construction. No load-bearing self-citation circularity or uniqueness-imported-from-authors pattern was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, mediators, forces, or conserved quantities are postulated. The WKB curve (Catalan curve x^K + y^N = 1) and the mirror curve (three-punctured sphere) are geometric objects drawn from prior literature on Catalan curves and the topological vertex. The only novel conceptual objects are reinterpretations (homology cycles labeled by Z_K x Z_N rotations, the Pochhammer-contour basis), not newly invented physical entities.

free parameters (3)
  • Period normalization N_n = Eq. (2.47)/(5.18): N_n = (-1)^n (K+N)^(n/2-1) (1-e^(-2 pi i (n-1)/K)) (1-e^(-2 pi i (n-1)/N)) B(-(n-1)/K, -(n-1)/N)
    Chosen ad hoc so that the period integrals match the CFT-side eigenvalues; the paper says 'we normalized in rather ad hoc way' (Section 2.2.3). The matching (2.49)-(2.50) calibrates the dictionary and fixes the overall scale of each charge.
  • Dictionary scale sqrt(N(K+N)) = sigma_j <-> sqrt(N(K+N)) a_j^(cyl) (Eq. 5.27)
    The scale in (5.27) is fixed by comparing the first few normalized periods with the explicit primary charges (3.46) and then assumed to hold for all higher charges.
  • Large-K Hankel normalization factor = -(2n-1)/2 (Eq. 8.32)
    The paper admits the relative normalization in (8.32) is fixed by comparing one state's eigenvalue, so equality with the Hankel-contour integral could always be imposed.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption ODE/IM correspondence for W_N as established in [29,30,31,32,15]
    The paper builds on the correspondence rather than proving it; introduced in Sections 2.2 and 5.1 ('the general prescription is already known from [30,31,32]').
  • domain assumption Apparent singularities with Frobenius indices {-1,1,2,...,N-2,N} (Eq. 5.39) lead to complete Bethe equations
    Follows the prescription of [31] (their formula 5.21); the resulting Bethe equations are derived in Section 6, but the index choice is taken from prior work, not derived here.
  • domain assumption Formal WKB expansion (5.6) is an asymptotic series whose period integrals give the true spectral data
    The WKB ansatz is used throughout (Sections 2.2.2 and 5.1); convergence, Borel summability, and the relation of the formal series to exact monodromy data are not addressed.
  • domain assumption Physical Bethe roots form full Z_{K+N} orbits
    Used in the orbifold reduction (Sections 2.2.5 and 6.1); justified by the Symanzik rotation symmetry of the ODE, not by an independent proof that all physical solutions are orbit-invariant.
  • ad hoc to paper Parameter identification sigma_j <-> sqrt(N(K+N)) a_j^(cyl) (Eq. 5.27)
    Fixed by matching the first few charges (5.26); the same identification is used to compare all higher charges, with low-order verification only.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On W-algebras and ODE/IM correspondence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U4BWOMBZ

@misc{pith2026250820793,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On W-algebras and ODE/IM correspondence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U4BWOMBZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20793}
}
abstract

We study the ODE/IM correspondence for two-dimensional conformal field theories with Virasoro and $\mathcal{W}_N$ symmetry. Building on earlier work establishing the correspondence, we develop a systematic algorithm for calculating the eigenvalues of local integrals of motion in terms of the Bethe roots using formal WKB expansions of wave functions associated to the differential operators. The method is demonstrated explicitly for Virasoro, $\mathcal{W}_3$, and $\mathcal{W}_4$ algebras, yielding closed expressions for the eigenvalues of the first few local quantum KdV Hamiltonians. A key geometric structure emerging from our analysis is the mirror curve, a three-punctured sphere that is naturally covered by the WKB curve. We show how the algebraic properties of the $\mathcal{W}$-symmetry algebras are reflected in the geometry of these curves, and how period integrals on these curves reproduce the spectral data of the integrable system. Applications to Argyres-Douglas minimal models allow us to test the prescription both analytically and numerically and we find complete agreement between the calculations in different triality frames. Finally, we examine large rank limits of ground state eigenvalues and show that they match the genus expansion of the topological string partition function on $\mathbb{C}^3$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20793 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The basic combinatorial object underlying the representation theory of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Asymptotic Young diagram corresponding to ground state of ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Three-dimensional projection of genus 3 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The WKB curve x K + y N = 1 (in this case K = 4, N = 3) together with its projections to x-plane, y-plane and to t-plane (the mirror curve). The x-plane is a K-sheeted branched covering of M with respect to τx with a ramification point at x = 0 (red) and x = ∞. Analogo…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Complex plot of the t(z) in the case of (A2, A3) model, i.e. a plot where the color corresponds to the phase of t. We see that the function respects the symmetries of the tiling, i.e. is indeed an automorphic function. independent anti-holomorphic 1-forms which togethe…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Illustration of counting of holomorphic differentials for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Projections of the basic homology cycles on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Some of the geodesics representing the homology classes in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Pochhammer contour in t-plane. The red arrow corresponds to the point where we start the description of the contour. i.e. both in the interval (0, 1) with x near x = 0 and y near y = 1. This specifies the initial point of a lift of the Pochhammer contour from the t-pla…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Uniformization procedure that we use to find the constant curvature metric on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p107_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Tiling of the hyperbolic disk as an image of analytic continuation of the Schwarz triangle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p114_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Construction of the circles representing the sides of the polygon and the geodesics generating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p122_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Tiling corresponding to parameters (N, K) = (2, 3) of Lee-Yang model. In this case the genus of W is one so the universal covering space is simply the flat complex plane and this is tiled by Euclidean triangles of angles π 6 , π 2 and π 3 . 3. it is the intersection o…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The image of the geodesic arcs parametrizing the curve [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p125_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Limiting large K and N picture showing the sides of the fundamental polygon (red) and 6 segments of the generating geodesic in the upper half plane model (in τ coordinate). All the curves shown in this figure are euclidean circles with center on the real axis, i.e. ge…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Parametrization of the Pochhammer contour using modular [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p127_16.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. The ODE/IM Correspondence between $C(2)^{(2)}$-type Linear Problems and 2d $\mathcal{N}=1$ SCFT

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    WKB periods from the C(2)^{(2)} linear problem match eigenvalues of local integrals of motion in the Neveu-Schwarz sector of 2d N=1 SCFTs up to sixth order.

  2. Modular Properties of Symplectic Fermion Generalised Gibbs Ensemble

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Exact modular S-transforms are derived for GGEs in the symplectic fermion theory, agreeing with conjectures for the W3 zero mode and mirroring free-fermion results for the KdV subset.

  3. On the Integrable Structure of the SU(2) Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten Model

    hep-th 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new family of commuting local conserved charges in the SU(2) WZNW model is constructed for the first four spins and shown to agree with Bethe-ansatz and ODE/quantum-field-theory predictions.

  4. Integrals of motion in $WE_6$ CFT and the ODE/IM correspondence

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Period integrals from the E6 ODE WKB expansion match eigenvalues of WE6 CFT integrals of motion up to sixth order.

  5. Integrals of motion in $WE_6$ CFT and the ODE/IM correspondence

    hep-th 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The WKB periods of the E_6^(1) linear problem agree with the integrals of motion of the W E6 CFT on highest-weight states up to spin 6 under the standard parameter dictionary.

  6. The ODE/IM Correspondence between $C(2)^{(2)}$-type Linear Problems and 2d $\mathcal{N}=1$ SCFT

    hep-th 2026-04 accept novelty 5.5 of 10

    WKB periods of the fully diagonalized C(2)^{(2)} Lax operator coincide with NS-sector local IoM eigenvalues of N=1 SCFT up to sixth order under a fixed parameter dictionary.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

129 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two- Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,

    A. A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite Conformal Symmetry in Two- Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 241, pp. 333–380, 1984

    1984

  2. [2]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Senechal, Conformal Field Theory . Graduate Texts in Con- temporary Physics, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1997

    1997

  3. [3]

    W symmetry in conformal field theory,

    P. Bouwknegt and K. Schoutens, “W symmetry in conformal field theory,” Phys. Rept., vol. 223, pp. 183–276, 1993, hep-th/9210010

    arXiv 1993

  4. [4]

    An AdS3 Dual for Minimal Model CFTs,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “An AdS3 Dual for Minimal Model CFTs,” Phys. Rev. , vol. D83, p. 066007, 2011, 1011.2986. 19Here we slightly differ with respect to equation (2.21) in [59] but we are consistent with equations stated in [93, 94]. 137

    arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Symmetries of Holographic Minimal Models,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and T. Hartman, “Symmetries of Holographic Minimal Models,” JHEP, vol. 05, p. 031, 2011, 1101.2910

    arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Duality in N=2 Minimal Model Holography,

    C. Candu and M. R. Gaberdiel, “Duality in N=2 Minimal Model Holography,” JHEP, vol. 02, p. 070, 2013, 1207.6646

    arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    Integrable structure of conformal field theory, quantum KdV theory and thermodynamic Bethe ansatz,

    V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Integrable structure of conformal field theory, quantum KdV theory and thermodynamic Bethe ansatz,” Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 177, pp. 381–398, 1996, hep-th/9412229

    arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    Integrable structure of conformal field theory. 2. Q operator and DDV equation,

    V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Integrable structure of conformal field theory. 2. Q operator and DDV equation,” Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 190, pp. 247–278, 1997, hep-th/9604044

    arXiv 1997

Show all 129 references
  1. [9]

    Integrable quantum field theories in finite volume: Excited state energies,

    V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Integrable quantum field theories in finite volume: Excited state energies,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 489, pp. 487–531, 1997, hep-th/9607099

    1997 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Integrable structure of conformal field theory. 3. The Yang-Baxter relation,

    V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Integrable structure of conformal field theory. 3. The Yang-Baxter relation,” Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 200, pp. 297–324, 1999, hep-th/9805008

    1999 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Anharmonic oscillators, the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, and nonlinear integral equations,

    P. Dorey and R. Tateo, “Anharmonic oscillators, the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz, and nonlinear integral equations,” J. Phys. A , vol. 32, pp. L419–L425, 1999, hep-th/9812211

    1999 arXiv

  4. [12]

    On the relation between Stokes multipliers and the T-Q systems of conformal field theory,

    P. Dorey and R. Tateo, “On the relation between Stokes multipliers and the T-Q systems of conformal field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 563, pp. 573–602, 1999, hep-th/9906219. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 603, 581–581 (2001)]

    1999 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Spectral equivalences, Bethe Ansatz equations, and reality properties in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,

    P. Dorey, C. Dunning, and R. Tateo, “Spectral equivalences, Bethe Ansatz equations, and reality properties in PT-symmetric quantum mechanics,” J. Phys. A , vol. 34, pp. 5679–5704, 2001, hep- th/0103051

    2001

  6. [14]

    The ODE/IM Correspondence,

    P. Dorey, C. Dunning, and R. Tateo, “The ODE/IM Correspondence,” J. Phys. A , vol. 40, p. R205, 2007, hep-th/0703066

    2007 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Geometric aspects of the ODE/IM correspondence,

    P. Dorey, C. Dunning, S. Negro, and R. Tateo, “Geometric aspects of the ODE/IM correspondence,” J. Phys. A , vol. 53, no. 22, p. 223001, 2020, 1911.13290

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting,

    N. A. Nekrasov, “Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , vol. 7, pp. 831–864, 2004, hep-th/0206161

    2004 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories,

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto, and Y. Tachikawa, “Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories,” Lett. Math. Phys. , vol. 91, pp. 167–197, 2010, 0906.3219. 138

    2010 arXiv

  10. [18]

    On combinatorial expansion of the conformal blocks arising from AGT conjecture,

    V. A. Alba, V. A. Fateev, A. V. Litvinov, and G. M. Tarnopolskiy, “On combinatorial expansion of the conformal blocks arising from AGT conjecture,” Lett. Math. Phys. , vol. 98, pp. 33–64, 2011, 1012.1312

    2011 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, W. Peelaers, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “Infinite Chiral Symmetry in Four Dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 336, no. 3, pp. 1359–1433, 2015, 1312.5344

    2015 arXiv

  12. [20]

    The Topological vertex,

    M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Marino, and C. Vafa, “The Topological vertex,” Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 254, pp. 425–478, 2005, hep-th/0305132

    2005 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Topological strings and integrable hierarchies,

    M. Aganagic, R. Dijkgraaf, A. Klemm, M. Marino, and C. Vafa, “Topological strings and integrable hierarchies,” Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 261, pp. 451–516, 2006, hep-th/0312085

    2006 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Quantum Calabi-Yau and classical crystals,

    A. Okounkov, N. Reshetikhin, and C. Vafa, “Quantum Calabi-Yau and classical crystals,” Progr. Math., vol. 244, p. 597, 2006, hep-th/0309208

    2006 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Quantum foam and topological strings,

    A. Iqbal, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, and C. Vafa, “Quantum foam and topological strings,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 011, 2008, hep-th/0312022

    2008 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Quantum continuous gl∞ : Semiinfinite construction of representations,

    B. Feigin, E. Feigin, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and E. Mukhin, “Quantum continuous gl∞ : Semiinfinite construction of representations,” Kyoto J. Math. , vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 337–364, 2011

    2011

  17. [25]

    Quantum continuous gl∞ : Tensor products of fock modules and Wn -characters,

    B. Feigin, E. Feigin, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and E. Mukhin, “Quantum continuous gl∞ : Tensor products of fock modules and Wn -characters,” Kyoto J. Math. , vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 365–392, 2011

    2011

  18. [26]

    Quantum toroidal gl1-algebra: Plane partitions: plane partitions,

    B. Feigin, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and E. Mukhin, “Quantum toroidal gl1-algebra: Plane partitions: plane partitions,” Journal of mathematics of Kyoto University , vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 621–659, 2012

    2012

  19. [27]

    Quantum Groups and Quantum Cohomology,

    D. Maulik and A. Okounkov, “Quantum Groups and Quantum Cohomology,” 2012, arXiv:1211.1287

    2012 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Cherednik algebras, W-algebras and the equivariant cohomology of the moduli space of instantons on A2,

    O. Schiffmann and E. Vasserot, “Cherednik algebras, W-algebras and the equivariant cohomology of the moduli space of instantons on A2,” Publications math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 213–342, 2013, arXiv:1202.2756

    2013 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Higher level eigenvalues of Q op- erators and Schroedinger equation,

    V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Higher level eigenvalues of Q op- erators and Schroedinger equation,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 711–725, 2003, hep-th/0307108

    2003 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Pseudo-differential equations, and the Bethe ansatz for the classical Lie algebras,

    P. Dorey, C. Dunning, D. Masoero, J. Suzuki, and R. Tateo, “Pseudo-differential equations, and the Bethe ansatz for the classical Lie algebras,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 772, pp. 249–289, 2007, hep- th/0612298

    2007

  23. [31]

    Quantization of soliton systems and Langlands duality,

    B. Feigin and E. Frenkel, “Quantization of soliton systems and Langlands duality,” 5 2007, 0705.2486. 139

    2007 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Opers for higher states of quantum KdV models,

    D. Masoero and A. Raimondo, “Opers for higher states of quantum KdV models,” Commun. Math. Phys., vol. 378, no. 1, pp. 1–74, 2020, 1812.00228

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Lectures on nonlinear integrable equations and their solutions,

    A. Zabrodin, “Lectures on nonlinear integrable equations and their solutions,” 2018, 1812.11830

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Spectral determinants for Schrodinger equation and Q operators of conformal field theory,

    V. V. Bazhanov, S. L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Spectral determinants for Schrodinger equation and Q operators of conformal field theory,” J. Statist. Phys. , vol. 102, pp. 567–576, 2001, hep-th/9812247

    2001 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Counting monster potentials,

    R. Conti and D. Masoero, “Counting monster potentials,” JHEP, vol. 02, p. 059, 2021, 2009.14638

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    ExploringW∞ in the quadratic basis,

    T. Proch´ azka, “ExploringW∞ in the quadratic basis,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 116, 2015, 1411.7697

    2015 arXiv

  29. [37]

    W -symmetry, topological vertex and affine Yangian,

    T. Proch´ azka, “W -symmetry, topological vertex and affine Yangian,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 077, 2016, 1512.07178

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    W-Algebras and Integrability,

    T. Proch´ azka, “W-Algebras and Integrability,” in15th International Workshop on Lie Theory and Its Applications in Physics , 2 2024, 2402.10016

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Triality in Minimal Model Holography,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar, “Triality in Minimal Model Holography,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 127, 2012, 1205.2472

    2012 arXiv

  32. [40]

    SCFT/VOA correspondence via Ω-deformation,

    S. Jeong, “SCFT/VOA correspondence via Ω-deformation,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 171, 2019, 1904.00927

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    BPS structure of Argyres-Douglas superconformal theories,

    A. D. Shapere and C. Vafa, “BPS structure of Argyres-Douglas superconformal theories,” 10 1999, hep-th/9910182

    1999 arXiv

  34. [42]

    A Holographic computation of the central charges of d=4, N=2 SCFTs,

    O. Aharony and Y. Tachikawa, “A Holographic computation of the central charges of d=4, N=2 SCFTs,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 037, 2008, 0711.4532

    2008 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Central charges of N=2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions,

    A. D. Shapere and Y. Tachikawa, “Central charges of N=2 superconformal field theories in four dimensions,” JHEP, vol. 09, p. 109, 2008, 0804.1957

    2008 arXiv

  36. [44]

    R-Twisting and 4d/2d Correspondences,

    S. Cecotti, A. Neitzke, and C. Vafa, “R-Twisting and 4d/2d Correspondences,” 6 2010, 1006.3435

    2010 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Irregular singularities in Liouville theory and Argyres-Douglas type gauge theories, I,

    D. Gaiotto and J. Teschner, “Irregular singularities in Liouville theory and Argyres-Douglas type gauge theories, I,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 050, 2012, 1203.1052

    2012 arXiv

  38. [46]

    General Argyres-Douglas Theory,

    D. Xie, “General Argyres-Douglas Theory,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 100, 2013, 1204.2270

    2013 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Tachikawa, N=2 supersymmetric dynamics for pedestrians , vol

    Y. Tachikawa, N=2 supersymmetric dynamics for pedestrians , vol. 890. 12 2013, 1312.2684

    2013 arXiv

  40. [48]

    The N = 2 superconformal bootstrap,

    C. Beem, M. Lemos, P. Liendo, L. Rastelli, and B. C. van Rees, “The N = 2 superconformal bootstrap,” JHEP, vol. 03, p. 183, 2016, 1412.7541

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    On the superconformal index of Argyres–Douglas theories,

    M. Buican and T. Nishinaka, “On the superconformal index of Argyres–Douglas theories,” J. Phys. A, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 015401, 2016, 1505.05884. 140

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories,

    C. Cordova and S.-H. Shao, “Schur Indices, BPS Particles, and Argyres-Douglas Theories,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 040, 2016, 1506.00265

    2016 arXiv

  43. [51]

    N =1 Lagrangians for generalized Argyres-Douglas theo- ries,

    P. Agarwal, A. Sciarappa, and J. Song, “ N =1 Lagrangians for generalized Argyres-Douglas theo- ries,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 211, 2017, 1707.04751

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Argyres-Douglas Theories, Chiral Algebras and Wild Hitchin Characters,

    L. Fredrickson, D. Pei, W. Yan, and K. Ye, “Argyres-Douglas Theories, Chiral Algebras and Wild Hitchin Characters,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 150, 2018, 1701.08782

    2018 arXiv

  45. [53]

    ODE/IM correspondence and the Argyres-Douglas theory,

    K. Ito and H. Shu, “ODE/IM correspondence and the Argyres-Douglas theory,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 071, 2017, 1707.03596

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Vertex operator algebras of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5- branes,

    J. Song, D. Xie, and W. Yan, “Vertex operator algebras of Argyres-Douglas theories from M5- branes,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 123, 2017, 1706.01607

    2017 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Holographic Duals of Argyres-Douglas Theories,

    I. Bah, F. Bonetti, R. Minasian, and E. Nardoni, “Holographic Duals of Argyres-Douglas Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 127, no. 21, p. 211601, 2021, 2105.11567

    2021 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Carath´ eodory,Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable, Vol 1, vol

    C. Carath´ eodory,Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable, Vol 1, vol. 97. American Mathematical Soc., 1954

    1954

  49. [57]

    Topics in complex function theory, vol. 1: Elliptic functions and uniformization theory,

    C. L. Siegel, “Topics in complex function theory, vol. 1: Elliptic functions and uniformization theory,” 1969

    1969

  50. [58]

    J. J. Gray, Linear differential equations and group theory from Riemann to Poincar´ e . Springer, 2008

    2008

  51. [59]

    Opers for higher states of the quantum Boussinesq model,

    D. Masoero and A. Raimondo, “Opers for higher states of the quantum Boussinesq model,” 8 2019, 1908.11559

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    On Bethe equations of 2d conformal field theory,

    T. Proch´ azka and A. Watanabe, “On Bethe equations of 2d conformal field theory,”JHEP, vol. 09, p. 115, 2024, 2301.05147

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Instanton R-matrix andW-symmetry,

    T. Proch´ azka, “Instanton R-matrix andW-symmetry,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 099, 2019, 1903.10372

    2019 arXiv

  54. [62]

    A Mathematica package for computing operator product expansions,

    K. Thielemans, “A Mathematica package for computing operator product expansions,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. C , vol. 2, pp. 787–798, 1991

    1991

  55. [63]

    Virasoro Algebra, Vertex Operators, Quantum Sine-Gordon and Solv- able Quantum Field Theories,

    R. Sasaki and I. Yamanaka, “Virasoro Algebra, Vertex Operators, Quantum Sine-Gordon and Solv- able Quantum Field Theories,” Adv. Stud. Pure Math. , vol. 16, pp. 271–296, 1988

    1988

  56. [64]

    Deformations of Conformal Field Theories and Soliton Equations,

    T. Eguchi and S.-K. Yang, “Deformations of Conformal Field Theories and Soliton Equations,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 224, pp. 373–378, 1989

    1989

  57. [65]

    Thermal Correlation Functions of KdV Charges in 2D CFT,

    A. Maloney, G. S. Ng, S. F. Ross, and I. Tsiares, “Thermal Correlation Functions of KdV Charges in 2D CFT,” JHEP, vol. 02, p. 044, 2019, 1810.11053. 141

    2019 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Geometrical loci and CFTs via the Virasoro symmetry of the mKdV-SG hierarchy: An Excursus,

    D. Fioravanti, “Geometrical loci and CFTs via the Virasoro symmetry of the mKdV-SG hierarchy: An Excursus,” Phys. Lett. B , vol. 609, pp. 173–179, 2005, hep-th/0408079

    2005 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Marino, Advanced topics in quantum mechanics

    M. Marino, Advanced topics in quantum mechanics . Cambridge University Press, 2021

    2021

  60. [68]

    Introduction to Seiberg-Witten theory and its stringy origin,

    W. Lerche, “Introduction to Seiberg-Witten theory and its stringy origin,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl., vol. 55, pp. 83–117, 1997, hep-th/9611190

    1997 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Nekrasov Functions and Exact Bohr-Zommerfeld Integrals,

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, “Nekrasov Functions and Exact Bohr-Zommerfeld Integrals,” JHEP, vol. 04, p. 040, 2010, 0910.5670

    2010 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Nekrasov Functions from Exact BS Periods: The Case of SU(N),

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, “Nekrasov Functions from Exact BS Periods: The Case of SU(N),” J. Phys. A , vol. 43, p. 195401, 2010, 0911.2396

    2010 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Double quantization of Seiberg-Witten geometry and W-algebras,

    T. Kimura, “Double quantization of Seiberg-Witten geometry and W-algebras,” Proc. Symp. Pure Math., vol. 100, pp. 405–431, 2018, 1612.07590

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Seiberg-Witten period relations in Omega background,

    J.-E. Bourgine and D. Fioravanti, “Seiberg-Witten period relations in Omega background,” JHEP, vol. 08, p. 124, 2018, 1711.07570

    2018 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Non-perturbative approaches to the quantum Seiberg-Witten curve,

    A. Grassi, J. Gu, and M. Mari˜ no, “Non-perturbative approaches to the quantum Seiberg-Witten curve,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 106, 2020, 1908.07065

    2020 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Ito and H

    K. Ito and H. Shu, ODE/IM Correspondence and Quantum Periods , vol. 51 of SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics. Springer, 2025

    2025

  67. [75]

    On spectrum of IL W hierarchy in conformal field theory,

    A. V. Litvinov, “On spectrum of IL W hierarchy in conformal field theory,” JHEP, vol. 11, p. 155, 2013, 1307.8094

    2013 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Q-functions for lambda opers,

    D. Masoero, E. Mukhin, and A. Raimondo, “ Q-functions for lambda opers,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.08842, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Infinite Additional Symmetries in Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Infinite Additional Symmetries in Two-Dimensional Conformal Quantum Field Theory,” Theor. Math. Phys. , vol. 65, pp. 1205–1213, 1985. [Teor. Mat. Fiz.65,347(1985)]

    1985

  70. [78]

    W algebras of negative rank,

    K. Hornfeck, “W algebras of negative rank,” Phys. Lett. , vol. B343, pp. 94–102, 1995, hep- th/9410013

    1995

  71. [79]

    Universal two-parameter W∞-algebra and vertex algebras of type W(2, 3, . . . , N),

    A. R. Linshaw, “Universal two-parameter W∞-algebra and vertex algebras of type W(2, 3, . . . , N),” 2017, 1710.02275

    2017 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Webs of W-algebras,

    T. Proch´ azka and M. Rapˇ c´ ak, “Webs of W-algebras,” 2017, 1711.06888

    2017 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Plane partitions with a “pit

    M. Bershtein, B. Feigin, and G. Merzon, “Plane partitions with a “pit”: generating functions and representation theory,” Selecta, vol. Math., no. 24, pp. 21–62, 2018

    2018

  74. [82]

    Vertex Algebras at the Corner,

    D. Gaiotto and M. Rapˇ c´ ak, “Vertex Algebras at the Corner,” 2017, 1703.00982. 142

    2017 arXiv

  75. [83]

    W-algebra Modules, Free Fields, and Gukov-Witten Defects,

    T. Proch´ azka and M. Rapˇ c´ ak, “W-algebra Modules, Free Fields, and Gukov-Witten Defects,” 2018, 1808.08837

    2018 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Cylindric partitions, Wr characters and the Andrews–Gordon–Bressoud identities,

    O. Foda and T. A. Welsh, “Cylindric partitions, Wr characters and the Andrews–Gordon–Bressoud identities,” J. Phys. A , vol. 49, no. 16, p. 164004, 2016, 1510.02213

    2016 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Yangian associated with 2D N = 1 SCFT,

    R.-D. Zhu and Y. Matsuo, “Yangian associated with 2D N = 1 SCFT,” PTEP, vol. 2015, no. 9, p. 093A01, 2015, 1504.04150

    2015 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Lectures on Liouville theory and matrix models,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov and A. Zamolodchikov, “Lectures on Liouville theory and matrix models,” Google Scholar, 2007

    2007

  79. [87]

    A quantitative version of Siegel’s theorem: integral points on elliptic curves and Catalan curves.,

    J. H. Silverman, “A quantitative version of Siegel’s theorem: integral points on elliptic curves and Catalan curves.,” 1987

    1987

  80. [88]

    Hodge cycles on the Jacobian variety of the Catalan curve,

    F. Hazama, “Hodge cycles on the Jacobian variety of the Catalan curve,” Compositio Mathematica, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 339–353, 1997

    1997

  81. [89]

    Torsion points on Fermat quotients of the form yn = xd + 1,

    V. Arul, “Torsion points on Fermat quotients of the form yn = xd + 1,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.14251, 2019

    1910 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Sato–Tate Distributions of Catalan Curves,

    H. Goodson, “Sato–Tate Distributions of Catalan Curves,” Journal de th´ eorie des nombres de Bordeaux, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 87–113, 2023

    2023

  83. [91]

    Miranda, Algebraic curves and Riemann surfaces , vol

    R. Miranda, Algebraic curves and Riemann surfaces , vol. 5. American Mathematical Soc., 1995

    1995

  84. [92]

    Integrable structure of W3 conformal field theory, quantum Boussinesq theory and boundary affine Toda theory,

    V. V. Bazhanov, A. N. Hibberd, and S. M. Khoroshkin, “Integrable structure of W3 conformal field theory, quantum Boussinesq theory and boundary affine Toda theory,” Nucl. Phys., vol. B622, pp. 475–547, 2002, hep-th/0105177

    2002 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Integrable structure of higher spin CFT and the ODE/IM correspondence,

    S. K. Ashok, S. Parihar, T. Sengupta, A. Sudhakar, and R. Tateo, “Integrable structure of higher spin CFT and the ODE/IM correspondence,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 179, 2024, 2405.12636

    2024 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Thermal correlators and currents of the W3 algebra,

    S. K. Ashok, S. Parihar, T. Sengupta, A. Sudhakar, and R. Tateo, “Thermal correlators and currents of the W3 algebra,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 154, 2025, 2410.11748

    2025 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Intersection theory for twisted cycles,

    M. Kita and M. Yoshida, “Intersection theory for twisted cycles,” Mathematische Nachrichten , vol. 166, no. 1, pp. 287–304, 1994

    1994

  88. [96]

    Aomoto, Theory of hypergeometric functions

    K. Aomoto, Theory of hypergeometric functions . Springer, 2011

    2011

  89. [97]

    Monodromy relations from twisted homology,

    E. Casali, S. Mizera, and P. Tourkine, “Monodromy relations from twisted homology,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 087, 2019, 1910.08514

    2019 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Excited states by analytic continuation of TBA equations,

    P. Dorey and R. Tateo, “Excited states by analytic continuation of TBA equations,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 482, pp. 639–659, 1996, hep-th/9607167. 143

    1996 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Exponential Networks, WKB and Topological String,

    A. Grassi, Q. Hao, and A. Neitzke, “Exponential Networks, WKB and Topological String,” SIGMA, vol. 19, p. 064, 2023, 2201.11594

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Chern-Simons theory, matrix models, and topological strings,

    M. Marino, “Chern-Simons theory, matrix models, and topological strings,” Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys., vol. 131, pp. 1–197, 2005

    2005

  93. [101]

    Appendix: the Mellin transform and other useful analytic techniques,

    D. Zagier, “Appendix: the Mellin transform and other useful analytic techniques,” 2006

    2006

  94. [102]

    Integrals of motion in conformal field theory with W-symmetry and the ODE/IM correspondence,

    K. Ito and M. Zhu, “Integrals of motion in conformal field theory with W-symmetry and the ODE/IM correspondence,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 1010, p. 116756, 2025, 2408.12917

    2025 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Diagonalization of GL(N ) invariant transfer matrices and quantum N wave system (Lee model),

    P. P. Kulish and N. Y. Reshetikhin, “Diagonalization of GL(N ) invariant transfer matrices and quantum N wave system (Lee model),” J. Phys. A , vol. 16, pp. L591–L596, 1983

    1983

  96. [104]

    Classical Yang-Baxter equations and quantum integrable systems,

    B. Jurco, “Classical Yang-Baxter equations and quantum integrable systems,” J. Math. Phys. , vol. 30, pp. 1289–1293, 1989

    1989

  97. [105]

    Introduction to the nested algebraic Bethe ansatz,

    N. A. Slavnov, “Introduction to the nested algebraic Bethe ansatz,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , vol. 19, p. 1, 2020, 1911.12811

    2020 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Kondo line defects and affine Gaudin models,

    D. Gaiotto, J. H. Lee, B. Vicedo, and J. Wu, “Kondo line defects and affine Gaudin models,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 175, 2022, 2010.07325

    2022 arXiv

  99. [107]

    The matrix-extendedW1+∞ algebra,

    L. Eberhardt and T. Proch´ azka, “The matrix-extendedW1+∞ algebra,” JHEP, vol. 12, p. 175, 2019, 1910.00041

    2019 arXiv

  100. [108]

    The Grassmannian VOA,

    L. Eberhardt and T. Proch´ azka, “The Grassmannian VOA,”JHEP, vol. 09, p. 150, 2020, 2006.02422

    2020 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories,

    N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili, “Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories,” in 16th International Congress on Mathematical Physics , pp. 265–289, 2010, 0908.4052

    2010 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Quantization of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equa- tion,

    K. K. Kozlowski, E. Sklyanin, and A. Torrielli, “Quantization of the Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equa- tion,” Theor. Math. Phys. , vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 1162–1183, 2017, 1607.07685

    2017 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Six-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories, quantum cohomology of instanton moduli spaces and gl(N) Quantum Intermediate Long Wave Hydrodynamics,

    G. Bonelli, A. Sciarappa, A. Tanzini, and P. Vasko, “Six-dimensional supersymmetric gauge theories, quantum cohomology of instanton moduli spaces and gl(N) Quantum Intermediate Long Wave Hydrodynamics,” JHEP, vol. 07, p. 141, 2014, 1403.6454

    2014 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Gauge/Bethe correspondence from quiver BPS algebras,

    D. Galakhov, W. Li, and M. Yamazaki, “Gauge/Bethe correspondence from quiver BPS algebras,” JHEP, vol. 11, p. 119, 2022, 2206.13340

    2022 arXiv

  105. [113]

    On the Instanton R-matrix,

    A. Smirnov, “On the Instanton R-matrix,” Commun. Math. Phys. , vol. 345, no. 3, pp. 703–740, 2016, 1302.0799

    2016 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Finite type modules and Bethe ansatz equations,

    B. Feigin, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and E. Mukhin, “Finite type modules and Bethe ansatz equations,” in Annales Henri Poincar´ e, vol. 18, pp. 2543–2579, Springer, 2017. 144

    2017

  107. [115]

    Finite type modules and Bethe ansatz for quantum toroidal gl1,

    B. Feigin, M. Jimbo, T. Miwa, and E. Mukhin, “Finite type modules and Bethe ansatz for quantum toroidal gl1,” Communications in Mathematical Physics , vol. 356, no. 1, pp. 285–327, 2017

    2017

  108. [116]

    TBA equations and resurgent Quantum Mechanics,

    K. Ito, M. Mari˜ no, and H. Shu, “TBA equations and resurgent Quantum Mechanics,”JHEP, vol. 01, p. 228, 2019, 1811.04812

    2019 arXiv

  109. [117]

    WKB periods for higher order ODE and TBA equations,

    K. Ito, T. Kondo, K. Kuroda, and H. Shu, “WKB periods for higher order ODE and TBA equations,” JHEP, vol. 10, p. 167, 2021, 2104.13680

    2021 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Wall-crossing of TBA equations and WKB periods for the third order ODE,

    K. Ito, T. Kondo, and H. Shu, “Wall-crossing of TBA equations and WKB periods for the third order ODE,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 979, p. 115788, 2022, 2111.11047

    2022 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz in Relativistic Models. Scaling Three State Potts and Lee-yang Models,

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, “Thermodynamic Bethe Ansatz in Relativistic Models. Scaling Three State Potts and Lee-yang Models,” Nucl. Phys. B , vol. 342, pp. 695–720, 1990

    1990

  112. [120]

    Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approx- imation,

    D. Gaiotto, G. W. Moore, and A. Neitzke, “Wall-crossing, Hitchin systems, and the WKB approx- imation,” Adv. Math., vol. 234, pp. 239–403, 2013, 0907.3987

    2013 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Opers and TBA,

    D. Gaiotto, “Opers and TBA,” 3 2014, 1403.6137

    2014 arXiv

  114. [122]

    T-systems and Y-systems in integrable systems,

    A. Kuniba, T. Nakanishi, and J. Suzuki, “T-systems and Y-systems in integrable systems,” J. Phys. A, vol. 44, p. 103001, 2011, 1010.1344

    2011 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Modular properties of characters of the W 3 algebra,

    N. J. Iles and G. M. T. Watts, “Modular properties of characters of the W 3 algebra,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 089, 2016, 1411.4039

    2016 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Free fermions, KdV charges, generalised Gibbs ensembles and modular transforms,

    M. Downing and G. M. T. Watts, “Free fermions, KdV charges, generalised Gibbs ensembles and modular transforms,” JHEP, vol. 06, p. 036, 2022, 2111.13950

    2022 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Chiral deformations of conformal field theories,

    R. Dijkgraaf, “Chiral deformations of conformal field theories,” Nucl. Phys. B, vol. 493, pp. 588–612, 1997, hep-th/9609022

    1997 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Free fermions, KdV charges, generalised Gibbs ensembles, modular transforms and line defects,

    M. Downing and G. M. T. Watts, “Free fermions, KdV charges, generalised Gibbs ensembles, modular transforms and line defects,” JHEP, vol. 01, p. 041, 2024, 2311.04564

    2024 arXiv

  119. [127]

    Limit shapes, real and imagined,

    A. Okounkov, “Limit shapes, real and imagined,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 187–216, 2016

    2016

  120. [128]

    Topological Strings from Quantum Mechanics,

    A. Grassi, Y. Hatsuda, and M. Marino, “Topological Strings from Quantum Mechanics,” Annales Henri Poincare, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3177–3235, 2016, 1410.3382

    2016 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Spectral theory and mirror symmetry.,

    M. Marino, “Spectral theory and mirror symmetry.,” Proc. Symp. Pure Math., vol. 98, p. 259, 2018, 1506.07757. 145

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.