Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 58 references

Real-Time Hardware-Free HIFU Interference Suppression via Teacher-Student Diffusion Framework

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A diffusion model that cleans HIFU interference directly from ultrasound B-mode images can run at real-time frame rates on a standard GPU, without RF data or hardware synchronization.

desk verdict The body is a plausible applied diffusion paper with a real dataset, but the abstract describes a different system whose numbers never appear in the text — as submitted, the headline claim is unsupported, though the underlying work deserves referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01557 v2 pith:SS2WZPAB submitted 2025-09-01 cs.CV

Dejia Cai , Ali Abdollahi , Xi Wang , Kun Yang , Zhaohui Guo , Xiaowei Zhou , Hao Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords HIFUinterferencesuppressionlatentdiffusionmodelultrasoundimagerestorationreal-timeinferenceteacher-studentdistillationVQ-VAEB-modeimage-domaindenoising
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is trying to establish that a diffusion model can remove HIFU-induced acoustic interference from ultrasound images in real time, using only the B-mode images themselves—no proprietary RF data, no extra hardware synchronization. If true, it would let clinicians monitor HIFU treatment continuously while the therapy transducer is firing, instead of pausing therapy to take clean images. The central claim is that an image-domain latent diffusion model, and its distilled one-step successor, can both restore image quality far beyond the standard notch filter and run fast enough for live guidance. The paper builds a large paired dataset across imaging modes, power levels, and phantom, ex vivo, and in vivo tissues, and validates restoration quality with SSIM/PSNR, a radiologist-graded scale, and a downstream entropy-imaging check.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the latent space: a VQ-VAE encoder maps contaminated and clean ultrasound frames into a compact discrete latent representation, where an attention-based U-Net noise predictor runs iterative denoising conditioned on the contaminated frame's latent. DDIM sampling lets the same model trade speed for fidelity by choosing a small or large number of reverse steps. In the teacher-student formulation, a multi-step UNet teacher supplies high-fidelity prior knowledge that is distilled into a one-step student with manifold-constrained hyper-connections, which is what converts the iterative pipeline into a real-time single forward pass.

What would settle it

On a stationary phantom with a fixed geometry, record HIFU-on frames and HIFU-off references at several delays after switch-off, for example 0 ms, 50 ms, and 200 ms. If model outputs compared against the 200-ms settled reference show substantially lower SSIM/PSNR than against the immediate next frame, then part of the reported gain is an artifact of the paired-frame protocol rather than genuine restoration of anatomy.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that HIFU interference—the acoustic contamination that appears on ultrasound guidance images while the therapy transducer is firing—can be suppressed by a diffusion model that works directly on B-mode images, with no need for raw RF data or hardware synchronization. In the full text, the proposed HIFU-ILDiff encodes the contaminated frame into a VQ-VAE latent space, runs a conditional latent diffusion denoising, and decodes a clean frame, reaching 15 frames per second while lifting in-vitro SSIM/PSNR from 0.443/14.42 (notch filter) to 0.796/23.78. The abstract goes further with mHC-Diff, a teacher-student distilled version that runs at roughly 20 FPS on an RTX 4090 and repor

Load-bearing premise

The only clean reference for a contaminated frame is the frame captured right after HIFU is switched off; if tissue motion or speckle changes the scene during that gap, the reported SSIM/PSNR partly measure temporal consistency rather than true restoration, and the model's additive-noise view of interference is an approximation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ultrasound-guided HIFU can be monitored continuously during sonication, instead of pausing therapy to acquire clean frames.
  • The method works on standard B-mode images, so it can be used with existing ultrasound systems without proprietary RF access or extra hardware synchronization.
  • The sampling-step knob lets clinicians trade a little image quality for higher frame rate, adapting to different latency requirements.
  • The denoised frames retain enough acoustic information for downstream quantitative imaging, such as weighted ultrasound entropy imaging, to delineate the treatment zone.
  • The distilled student achieves a substantial speedup over iterative diffusion baselines, making near-real-time deployment on a single clinical GPU plausible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the paired ground truth is the frame captured right after HIFU is switched off, the model may also be learning to undo motion and speckle decorrelation between those frames; a motion-controlled phantom study would separate true interference suppression from temporal smoothing.
  • The teacher-student distillation result suggests that for this class of restoration, a one-step student can match or exceed the teacher's reported PSNR, implying the bottleneck may be data and pairing quality rather than sampling budget.
  • The same image-domain architecture could be applied to other therapeutic-ultrasound interference sources, such as cavitation or heating artifacts, or to other real-time image restoration tasks where raw RF data is unavailable.
  • If real-time suppression holds across human clinical datasets, the practical workflow of HIFU ablation could shift from intermittent imaging with therapy pauses to continuous ultrasound guidance, pending regulatory validation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The submission's abstract describes a teacher-student distilled diffusion framework, mHC-Diff, for real-time HIFU interference suppression, claiming 26.65 dB PSNR, ~20 FPS on an RTX 4090, and a ~6.8x speedup over iterative diffusion baselines such as HIFU-Diff. The full text, however, describes a different method, HIFU-ILDiff, a VQ-VAE-based latent diffusion model with DDIM sampling at K=5 or K=30. The full text presents a paired dataset of 18,802 ultrasound image pairs from phantoms, ex vivo tissues, and in vivo rabbit, with held-out-subject splits, and reports quantitative gains over a Notch Filter baseline (e.g., SSIM 0.796 vs. 0.443, PSNR 23.780 vs. 14.420 in phantoms). It also reports inference times of 75 ms/frame (K=5) and 342 ms/frame (K=30) and claims real-time processing at 15 FPS. None of the abstract's central elements--mHC-Diff, teacher-student distillation, one-step inference, 26.65 dB, HIFU-Diff, or the 6.8x speedup--appear anywhere in the full text.

Significance. If the full text's HIFU-ILDiff results are valid, the underlying contribution is potentially useful: an image-domain latent diffusion approach that avoids RF data and hardware synchronization, supported by a sizeable multi-subject, multi-modality dataset and public code. The held-out-subject evaluation and the consistent visual and quantitative improvements over the Notch Filter are notable strengths. However, the submission as a whole is built around the abstract's mHC-Diff claim, which is entirely unsupported by the body. The mismatch is not a minor presentational issue; it changes the claimed architecture, training paradigm, and performance numbers. As submitted, the central claim of the paper is not verifiable from the manuscript's content, and the full text's own real-time claim is internally inconsistent. The body might form the basis of a legitimate separate paper, but the current submission does not support its stated headline contribution.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract vs. full text] The abstract describes 'mHC-Diff' with 'Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections', a two-stage teacher-student distillation, a one-step student, 26.65 dB PSNR, ~20 FPS on an RTX 4090, and a ~6.8x speedup over 'HIFU-Diff'. None of these terms, numbers, or architectural components appear in the full text. The full text defines HIFU-ILDiff in Section 2.3, uses DDIM with K=5 or K=30, and reports best PSNR 24.562 dB (Table 4) and inference times 75/342 ms/frame (Section 3.4, Fig. 9). The abstract's central claim is therefore unsupported by any experiment or derivation in the body. This is a load-bearing inconsistency: the contribution claimed in the abstract cannot be validated by the manuscript's content.
  2. [Section 3.4 / Fig. 9 / Discussion] The full text claims real-time processing at 15 frames per second (Abstract, Section 4, Section 5), but Section 3.4 reports 75 ms/frame for K=5, which is 13.3 FPS, below the 15 FPS acquisition rate for Diverging Wave and Line Scan imaging (Section 2.5). Even the body's own 15 FPS claim is contradicted by its reported inference time. This undermines the central 'real-time' assertion independent of the abstract mismatch.
  3. [Section 2.5] Paired training/evaluation assumes the HIFU-off frame immediately following two HIFU-on frames is the ground truth for those contaminated frames. Over the 200 ms HIFU-off interval, in vivo respiratory/cardiac motion and speckle decorrelation change the underlying scene; the reference is not the true clean version of the contaminated frame. The Discussion concedes the additive-noise degradation model is approximate, but it does not address the temporal pairing issue. Reported SSIM/PSNR values therefore partly measure temporal mismatch rather than pure restoration accuracy. A sensitivity analysis (e.g., evaluating against a different HIFU-off frame, or using synthetic data with known ground truth) is needed to support the claimed restoration quality.
  4. [Section 2.8 / Table 4] The only quantitative baseline is the Notch Filter, and Section 2.8 justifies this by stating that existing deep-learning methods rely on RF data. However, references [10]-[12] describe learnable methods, and Section 4 asserts superiority over 'previous methods' without quantitative comparison. For a claim of state-of-the-art suppression, at least one comparison to an image-domain or diffusion-based method (or a clear scoping of the claim) is necessary. As it stands, the 'significantly outperforms' claim is supported only against a classical signal-processing baseline.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.6 vs. Abstract] The abstract in the full text (and Introduction contributions) states 18,872 image pairs, but Section 2.6 and Table 1 report 18,802 frames. The discrepancy should be resolved.
  2. [Section 2.4] The attention equation is garbled: 'SoftmaxU𝑄𝐾4-𝑑5W𝑉' should be formatted properly. Also, 'attention head channels of 32' in Section 2.7 is unclear; specify number of heads or head dimension.
  3. [Section 3.4] The text references 'Fig. 11' for inference time comparison, but the manuscript contains only Fig. 9. Check cross-references.
  4. [Table 6] The checkmark/backslash notation is ambiguous, especially for Method 1 (VQ-VAE with backslash in noise-predictor column). Clarify what backslash means; also the reported inference times (4 ms, 11 ms) seem to conflict with Section 3.4 values; explain whether these are VQ-VAE-only timings.
  5. [Section 3.2 / Table 4] Bootstrap confidence intervals are mentioned, but no implementation details (number of resamples, stratification) are given. The 'variance below 0.1' statement in Section 4 needs a clearer definition, as PSNR/SSIM variances are not reported in Table 4.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity; the core restoration result rests on physically paired HIFU-on/HIFU-off data, not on self-referential definitions. Minor self-citations ([12], [29]) are non-load-bearing; the abstract/body mismatch is an integrity concern, not circularity.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is empirical and self-contained. HIFU-ILDiff is trained on 18,802 paired frames where the last two HIFU-on frames are paired with the immediately following HIFU-off frame (Sec. 2.5), and evaluation is against those physically separate HIFU-off references (Sec. 2.8). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: K=5/K=30 are user-chosen DDIM sampling steps, not fitted from the test set. The diffusion formulation (Sec. 2.1) is standard DDPM/LDM with external citations (Ho et al., Rombach et al., Razavi et al.); the model does not invoke a uniqueness theorem or an ansatz smuggled in via self-citation. The paper does cite its own prior work: [12] for the SR-style formulation of HIFU suppression, and [29] for WUE validation of 'retained acoustic properties.' Both are peer-reviewed prior results and neither by itself forces the reported PSNR/SSIM; the WUE claim is a downstream qualitative check, not the source of the restoration numbers. The abstract's mHC-Diff/teacher-student/26.65 dB/20 FPS/6.8x claims do not appear in the body (body reports HIFU-ILDiff with K=5 at 75 ms/frame = 13.3 FPS and best PSNR 24.562); this is a serious internal inconsistency/missing-support issue, but it is not a circular derivation. The reader-identified weakness about the ~40-200 ms gap between HIFU-on and HIFU-off reference frames is a data-quality limitation, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on: standard diffusion/DDIM machinery taken as unproved background; an additive-degradation model for HIFU interference that the authors themselves flag as approximate; the temporal pairing of HIFU-on frames with the immediately following HIFU-off frame as clean references; and the use of HIFU-off images as the evaluation ground truth. Several free hyperparameters (timesteps, noise schedule, sampling steps, loss weights) were fitted or hand-tuned on the same validation distribution used for the headline numbers. No new physical entities are introduced, so the invented-entities ledger is empty.

free parameters (4)
  • Diffusion timestep count T = 1000
    Selected by ablation (Table 5): T=1000 gives the best validation SSIM/PSNR; T=500 and T=2000 degrade. Tuned on the same data distribution later used for headline numbers.
  • Linear noise schedule endpoints = 0.0015 to 0.0155
    Section 2.7: 'determined through extensive tuning'; no independent or theoretical justification.
  • Sampling steps K = 5 or 30
    Hand-chosen trade-off between speed and quality (Section 2.3); K=5 gives 75 ms/frame and K=30 gives 342 ms/frame (Table 6), which drives the real-time claim.
  • VQ-VAE loss weights (perceptual + adversarial) = not specified
    Section 2.7 mentions a custom loss with perceptual and adversarial components but gives no weights or discriminator details; reconstruction fidelity depends on these choices.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption HIFU interference is adequately modeled as an additive degradation D(x)+n that a super-resolution-style diffusion inversion can remove
    Section 2.1 formalizes x_d = D(x_c) + n; the Discussion concedes 'the model assumes that HIFU interference can be effectively modeled as noise, but real-world interference may involve more complex and dynamic patterns'.
  • domain assumption The HIFU-off frame captured immediately after the HIFU-on frames is a valid ground truth for those contaminated frames
    Section 2.5: 'the last two frames with HIFU-on were paired with the immediately following frame with HIFU-off'; respiration and cardiac motion in in vivo data make this temporal correspondence approximate.
  • standard math Standard diffusion forward process and DDIM sampling correctly enable conditional denoising in a VQ-VAE latent space
    Equations in Sections 2.1 to 2.3; standard results (Ho et al. [13], Rombach et al. [17]) assumed without proof.
  • domain assumption The HIFU-off B-mode image is the right reference for SSIM/PSNR, and those metrics track clinically relevant restoration
    Section 2.8 uses HIFU-off frames as the quantitative reference; no evidence that SSIM/PSNR correlate with diagnostic structure beyond one radiologist's categorical grading (Table 3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Real-Time Hardware-Free HIFU Interference Suppression via Teacher-Student Diffusion Framework." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SS2WZPAB

@misc{pith2026250901557,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Real-Time Hardware-Free HIFU Interference Suppression via Teacher-Student Diffusion Framework},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SS2WZPAB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01557}
}
read the original abstract

High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is a non-invasive therapy, yet its safety is often degraded by severe acoustic interference during continuous ultrasound guidance. Conventional HIFU interference suppression methods heavily rely on proprietary raw Radio-Frequency (RF) data or complex hardware synchronization, limiting their clinical utility and preventing real-time implementation. To address this limitation, we propose Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections Diffusion (mHC-Diff), an image-domain diffusion framework for real-time interference suppression without specialized hardware synchronization, disentangling complex interference from anatomical structures while ensuring high reconstruction fidelity. To achieve clinical real-time application, our approach employs a two-stage strategy: (i) anatomy-aware prior acquisition, where a diffusion model is trained with multi-step UNet as a highfidelity Teacher; and (ii) efficiency distillation, where this prior is distilled into a one-step Student via knowledge distillation to achieve real-time throughput. Extensive validation on a clinically representative dataset across diverse therapeutic scenarios shows that mHC-Diff achieves superior restoration (26.65 dB PSNR), while enabling real-time inference (~20 FPS) on a single NVIDIA RTX 4090, providing a ~6.8x speedup over iterative diffusion baselines (e.g., HIFU-Diff). By eliminating the requirement for specialized hardware synchronization and proprietary RF access, this image-domain framework ensures compatibility and facilitates real-time interference suppression during ultrasound-guided HIFU interventions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01557 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental setup for acquiring the HIFU interference dataset [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Timing control diagram for ultrasound signal acquisition and HIFU switching. 2.6 Distribution of the Image-based Dataset The dataset includes three commonly used clinical imaging modalities and four power levels typically employed in HIFU therapy, covering a variety of experimental subjects, including in vitro phantoms, ex vivo tissues, and in vivo tissues, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [10]

    Advances in neural information processing systems 33, 6840--6851 (2020)

    Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems 33, 6840--6851 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [12]

    J Pak Med Assoc 68(9), 1378--80 (2018)

    Imankulov, S., Tuganbekov, T., Razbadauskas, A., Seidagaliyeva, Z.: Hifu treatment for fibroadenoma-a clinical study at national scientific research centre, astana, kazakhstan. J Pak Med Assoc 68(9), 1378--80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [1]

    JAMA Neurology 74(12), 1412--1418 (2017)

    Bond, A.E., Shah, B.B., Huss, D.S., Dallapiazza, R.F., Warren, A., Ma, J., Kassell, N.F., Elias, W.J.: Safety and efficacy of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for patients with medication-refractory, tremor-dominant parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurology 74(12), 1412--1418 (2017)

    work page 2017

  4. [2]

    In: IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint Symposium (UFFC-JS)

    Cai, D., Yang, K., Liu, X., Xu, J., Ran, Y., Xu, Y., Zhou, X.: A novel diffusion-based deep learning model to suppress acoustic interference for real-time monitoring in ultrasound-guided hifu surgery. In: IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint Symposium (UFFC-JS). pp. 1--4. IEEE (2024). doi:10.1109/UFFC-JS60046.2024.10793861

    arXiv 2024

  5. [3]

    Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 254, 108304 (2024)

    Cai, D., Yang, K., Liu, X.B., Xu, J., Ran, Y., Xu, Y., Zhou, X.: Suppressing the hifu interference in ultrasound guiding images with a diffusion-based deep learning model. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 254, 108304 (2024)

    work page 2024

  6. [4]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops

    Cao, H., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Jiang, D., Zhang, X., Tian, Q., Wang, M.: Swin-unet: Unet-like pure transformer for medical image segmentation. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops. pp. 205--218. Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)

    Chen, L., Chu, X., Zhang, X., Sun, J.: Simple baselines for image restoration. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). pp. 17--33. Springer (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [6]

    International Journal of Hyperthermia 39(1), 466--474 (2022)

    Chen, Z., Cheng, L., Zhang, W., He, W.: Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation for hyperparathyroidism: current status and prospects. International Journal of Hyperthermia 39(1), 466--474 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 58 references
  1. [7]

    Advances in neural information processing systems 34, 8780--8794 (2021)

    Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A.: Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. Advances in neural information processing systems 34, 8780--8794 (2021)

    2021

  2. [8]

    International Journal of Hyperthermia 41(1), 2299479 (2024)

    Dou, Y., Zhang, L., Liu, Y., He, M., Wang, Y., Wang, Z.: Long-term outcome and risk factors of reintervention after high intensity focused ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Hyperthermia 41(1), 2299479 (2024)

    2024

  3. [9]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Esser, P., Rombach, R., Ommer, B.: Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 12873--12883 (2021)

    2021

  4. [11]

    Medical Physics 20(1), 107--115 (1993)

    Hynynen, K., Darkazanli, A., Unger, E., Schenck, J.F.: Mri-guided noninvasive ultrasound surgery. Medical Physics 20(1), 107--115 (1993)

    1993

  5. [14]

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging 41(4), 915--924 (2021)

    Lee, S.A., Konofagou, E.E.: Fus-net: U-net-based fus interference filtering. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 41(4), 915--924 (2021)

    2021

  6. [15]

    Frontiers in Physiology 16, 1602866 (2025)

    Liu, Z., Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Wan, X., Huang, X.: Machine learning-based predictive analysis of energy efficiency factors necessary for the hifu treatment of adenomyosis. Frontiers in Physiology 16, 1602866 (2025). doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1602866

    2025

  7. [16]

    IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 70(2), 492--504 (2024)

    Niu, A., Pham, T.X., Zhang, K., Sun, J., Zhu, Y., Yan, Q., Kweon, I.S., Zhang, Y.: Acdmsr: Accelerated conditional diffusion models for single image super-resolution. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 70(2), 492--504 (2024)

    2024

  8. [17]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 43(4), 1594--1604 (2023)

    Payen, T., Crouzet, S., Guillen, N., Chen, Y., Chapelon, J.Y., Lafon, C., Catheline, S.: Passive elastography for clinical hifu lesion detection. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 43(4), 1594--1604 (2023)

    2023

  9. [18]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 45(4), 4713--4726 (2022)

    Saharia, C., Ho, J., Chan, W., Salimans, T., Fleet, D.J., Norouzi, M.: Image super-resolution via iterative refinement. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 45(4), 4713--4726 (2022)

    2022

  10. [19]

    IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 69(4), 1370--1381 (2022)

    Shen, C.C., Lin, R.C., Wu, N.H.: Golay-encoded ultrasound monitoring of simultaneous high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment: a phantom study. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 69(4), 1370--1381 (2022)

    2022

  11. [20]

    Ultrasonics 138, 107224 (2024)

    Shen, C.C., Wu, N.H.: Ultrasound monitoring of simultaneous high-intensity focused ultrasound (hifu) therapy using minimum-peak-sidelobe coded excitation. Ultrasonics 138, 107224 (2024)

    2024

  12. [21]

    IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 61(9), 1580--1587 (2014)

    Song, J.H., Chang, J.H.: Correspondence-an effective pulse sequence for simultaneous hifu insonation and monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control 61(9), 1580--1587 (2014)

    2014

  13. [23]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology 69(7), 075006 (2024)

    Yang, K., Li, Q., Liu, H., Zeng, Q., Cai, D., Xu, J., Zhou, Y., Tsui, P.H., Zhou, X.: Suppressing hifu interference in ultrasound images using 1d u-net-based neural networks. Physics in Medicine & Biology 69(7), 075006 (2024)

    2024

  14. [24]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 43(8), 3001--3012 (2024)

    Yang, K., Li, Q., Xu, J., Tang, M.X., Wang, Z., Tsui, P.H., Zhou, X.: Frequency-domain robust pca for real-time monitoring of hifu treatment. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 43(8), 3001--3012 (2024)

    2024

  15. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision

    Zhang, K., Liang, J., Van Gool, L., Timofte, R.: Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision. pp. 4791--4800 (2021)

    2021

  16. [27]

    International Journal of Hyperthermia , volume=

    Long-term outcome and risk factors of reintervention after high intensity focused ultrasound ablation for uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis , author=. International Journal of Hyperthermia , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  17. [28]

    J Pak Med Assoc , volume=

    HIFU treatment for fibroadenoma-a clinical study at National Scientific Research Centre, Astana, Kazakhstan , author=. J Pak Med Assoc , volume=

  18. [29]

    Frontiers in Physiology , volume=

    Machine learning-based predictive analysis of energy efficiency factors necessary for the HIFU treatment of adenomyosis , author=. Frontiers in Physiology , volume=. 2025 , doi=

    2025

  19. [30]

    Ultrasonics Sonochemistry , volume=

    The interaction of shockwaves with a vapour bubble in boiling histotripsy: The shock scattering effect , author=. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  20. [31]

    Annals of Medicine and Surgery , volume=

    Histotripsy: an innovative approach for minimally invasive tumour and disease treatment , author=. Annals of Medicine and Surgery , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  21. [32]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , volume=

    Frequency-Domain robust PCA for Real-Time monitoring of HIFU treatment , author=. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  22. [33]

    IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , volume=

    Golay-encoded ultrasound monitoring of simultaneous high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment: a phantom study , author=. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  23. [34]

    IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , volume=

    Correspondence-An effective pulse sequence for simultaneous HIFU insonation and monitoring , author=. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  24. [35]

    Ultrasonics , volume=

    Ultrasound monitoring of simultaneous high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy using minimum-peak-sidelobe coded excitation , author=. Ultrasonics , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  25. [36]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , volume=

    Passive elastography for clinical HIFU lesion detection , author=. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  26. [37]

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging , volume=

    FUS-Net: U-Net-based FUS interference filtering , author=. IEEE transactions on medical imaging , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  27. [38]

    Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=

    Suppressing HIFU interference in ultrasound images using 1D U-Net-based neural networks , author=. Physics in Medicine & Biology , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  28. [39]

    Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine , volume=

    Suppressing the HIFU interference in ultrasound guiding images with a diffusion-based deep learning model , author=. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  29. [40]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  30. [41]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  31. [42]

    IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , volume=

    Image super-resolution via iterative refinement , author=. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  32. [43]

    IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting , volume=

    ACDMSR: Accelerated conditional diffusion models for single image super-resolution , author=. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  33. [44]

    Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages=

    Simple Baselines for Image Restoration , author=. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  34. [45]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  35. [46]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

    Taming transformers for high-resolution image synthesis , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

  36. [47]

    Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

    Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind image super-resolution , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

  37. [48]

    IEEE transactions on medical imaging , year=

    Mri super-resolution with partial diffusion models , author=. IEEE transactions on medical imaging , year=

  38. [49]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04677 , year=

    Live avatar: Streaming real-time audio-driven avatar generation with infinite length , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.04677 , year=

    arXiv

  39. [50]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.05242 , year=

    GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.05242 , year=

    arXiv

  40. [51]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00364 , year=

    Elucidating the Design Space of Diffusion-Based Generative Models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00364 , year=. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2206.00364 , publisher=

    doi arXiv

  41. [52]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18828 , year=

    One-step Diffusion with Distribution Matching Distillation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.18828 , year=. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2311.18828 , publisher=

    doi arXiv

  42. [53]

    IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint Symposium (UFFC-JS) , pages=

    A Novel Diffusion-Based Deep Learning Model to Suppress Acoustic Interference for Real-Time Monitoring in Ultrasound-Guided HIFU Surgery , author=. IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control Joint Symposium (UFFC-JS) , pages=. 2024 , doi=

    2024

  43. [54]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15127 , year=

    Gsco: Towards generalizable ai in medicine via generalist-specialist collaboration , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15127 , year=

    arXiv

  44. [55]

    Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

    Synergizing motion and appearance: Multi-scale compensatory codebooks for talking head video generation , author=. Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference , pages=

  45. [56]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24880 , year=

    mhc: Manifold-constrained hyper-connections , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.24880 , year=

    arXiv

  46. [57]

    IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , year=

    MRI Super-Resolution with Partial Diffusion Models , author=. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging , year=

  47. [58]

    JAMA Neurology , volume=

    Safety and efficacy of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for patients with medication-refractory, tremor-dominant Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial , author=. JAMA Neurology , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  48. [59]

    International Journal of Hyperthermia , volume=

    Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation for hyperparathyroidism: current status and prospects , author=. International Journal of Hyperthermia , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  49. [60]

    Medical Physics , volume=

    MRI-guided noninvasive ultrasound surgery , author=. Medical Physics , volume=. 1993 , publisher=

    1993

  50. [61]

    European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops , pages=

    Swin-Unet: Unet-like Pure Transformer for Medical Image Segmentation , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) Workshops , pages=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.