Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

The incidence of magnetism in blue and yellow straggler stars

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first observational evidence that blue and yellow straggler stars possess magnetic fields of the order of a hundred to a few hundred Gauss, measured with HARPSpol spectropolarimetry and least-squares deconvolution.

desk verdict First magnetic field detections in blue and yellow stragglers are credible, but weak membership for half the sample makes the abstract's broad claim overreach. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02304 v1 pith:XO2LJIVI submitted 2025-09-02 astro-ph.SR

S. Hubrig , S. P. Järvinen , I. Ilyin , M. Schöller This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords bluestragglerstarsyellowmagneticfieldsopenclustersspectropolarimetryleast-squaresdeconvolutionZeemansignaturesstellarmergers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Blue straggler stars are cluster stars that appear younger and hotter than the turn-off, believed to form from binary mass transfer or stellar mergers – events that might also generate magnetic fields in stars with radiative envelopes. This paper searches for magnetic fields in five blue and three yellow stragglers from a Gaia-based catalogue using high-resolution spectropolarimetric observations with HARPSpol. Applying least-squares deconvolution, the authors report the first observational evidence that blue and yellow stragglers possess magnetic fields of the order of a hundred to a few hundred Gauss. They find no dependence of field presence or strength on cluster age or metallicity, obtain the first definite magnetic-field detection in a Be-shell star, and reveal that several of the magnetized targets are newly identified binary or triple systems.

What carries the argument

The central technique is least-squares deconvolution (LSD), which combines the information from thousands of individual metal and helium lines in HARPSpol spectra into a single mean profile, greatly increasing the sensitivity to the circularly polarized Zeeman signature from which the mean longitudinal magnetic field ⟨Bz⟩ is measured. Detection significance is set by the false alarm probability (FAP) criterion of Donati et al. (1992): FAP ≤ 10⁻⁵ is a definite detection, 10⁻⁵ < FAP ≤ 10⁻³ is marginal, and larger values are non-detections. The sample is drawn from the Gaia DR2-based catalogue of blue stragglers in open clusters, selecting stars in clusters of different ages and metallicities so that any dependence of magnetism on the cluster environment can be tested.

What would settle it

Check the cluster membership of the eight targets with Gaia DR3 astrometry and radial velocities; if any star with a definite magnetic detection, especially HD 62329 (membership probability 0.5) or HD 101545 (not in the Rain catalogue), turns out to be a field star unassociated with its assigned cluster, then the measured fields belong to ordinary stars and the claim that stragglers host these fields is not supported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that blue straggler and yellow straggler stars host magnetic fields with strengths of roughly one hundred to a few hundred Gauss, comparable to the fields of ordinary magnetic OBA stars. Using the least-squares deconvolution technique on HARPSpol spectra, the authors achieve definite detections of a longitudinal field in four blue stragglers and three yellow stragglers, with a marginal detection in one further blue straggler; measured values include ⟨Bz⟩ = 156±46 G and −582±86 G across different nights. Because blue and yellow stragglers are theorized to be merger products or rejuvenated stars in mass-transfer binaries, the detection of magnetic fields in them is taken as observational support for the idea that strong binary interactions generate or preserve such fields. The paper also reports the first definite magnetic-field detection in a Be-shell star (HD 61954), and notes that two yellow stragglers and one blue straggler in the sample appear to be binary or triple systems.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on all eight measured stars really being blue or yellow stragglers that belong to their assigned open clusters, yet membership probabilities for some targets are as low as 0.5, one star is reclassified as a yellow straggler only from its Gaia colour, and one is absent from the Gaia-based catalogue entirely.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If true, these detections show that binary mass transfer or stellar mergers produce observable magnetic fields in intermediate-mass stars with radiative envelopes, supporting the merger scenario for magnetic field origin.
  • The absence of any detected correlation between field strength or incidence and cluster age or metallicity suggests the magnetic field generation in stragglers is set by the binaries' internal evolution rather than by the cluster environment.
  • Newly discovered binarity and multiplicity among the magnetized targets strengthens the case that stragglers are the missing short-period binaries of magnetic Ap/Bp stars.
  • The first definite magnetic detection in a Be-shell star implies that magnetic fields can also be present in at least some Be-shell objects, with potential consequences for the physics of their circumstellar disks.
  • The paper motivates a wider spectropolarimetric survey of the remaining bright blue and yellow stragglers in the Gaia-based catalogue to measure the true incidence of magnetism in these stars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A detection in seven of eight targets, if it holds in a larger sample, would imply that magnetism is far more common among stragglers than among ordinary OBA stars, where the incidence is about 10–15%; the present sample is too small to establish this, but it suggests stragglers could be a magnetically over-represented population.
  • Because the measured field is the rotation-modulated longitudinal component, the spread between the two epochs for individual stars (e.g., HD 61954, HD 62329) is consistent with oblique rotators like Ap/Bp stars; phase-resolved monitoring could test whether the field geometry is dipolar or more complex, as expected shortly after a merger.
  • A testable extension: search for the same Nd iii and Pr iii rare-earth spot signatures in a larger sample of stragglers; if they appear preferentially in the magnetic targets, it would indicate that the fields are strong enough to drive the chemical spot formation seen in Ap/Bp stars.
  • If the magnetic incidence among stragglers truly exceeds that of normal OBA stars, then the straggler channel could be an important missing piece in explaining the fossil-field fraction in intermediate-mass and massive stars.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents HARPSpol spectropolarimetric observations of eight blue and yellow straggler candidates in five open clusters (NGC 2437, NGC 2447, Trumpler 9, NGC 3114, IC 2944). Using least-squares deconvolution with element-specific line masks, the authors measure mean longitudinal magnetic fields and report definite detections in four blue stragglers and three yellow stragglers, with field strengths of tens to a few hundred Gauss, including the first definite detection in the Be-shell star HD 61954. They further identify several targets as binary or triple systems and find weak Nd III lines in two yellow stragglers. The paper concludes that these observations provide the first evidence that blue and yellow straggler stars can host magnetic fields, supporting merger and mass-transfer origin scenarios.

Significance. The observational methodology is a clear strength: the LSD analysis follows established procedures, null spectra are checked for all measurements, and multiple epochs for some targets (HD 61954, HD 62329, HD 62775, HD 65032) show independent detections. If the target classifications are correct, the result is significant because it connects the straggler phenomenon to magnetic field generation, offering a direct test of fossil-field versus binary-interaction dynamo theories. However, the significance is tempered by the small sample size (eight stars) and, more critically, by the uncertain straggler status of four of the eight targets; the paper would be substantially strengthened by a robustness analysis that restricts the sample to secure cluster members or by a more measured statement of the conclusions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2, Table 2] The central claim that blue and yellow straggler stars possess magnetic fields rests entirely on the eight targets being genuine stragglers of their assigned clusters. Four of the eight have weak or indirect membership/classification: HD 61954 (Rain et al. 2021 membership probability 0.8), HD 62329 (probability 0.5), HD 65032 (reclassified as a YSS from Gaia colors, with the caveat in Sect. 3.3 that the effect of a magnetic field on Gaia colors is unexplored), and HD 101545 (absent from the Rain catalog, membership from Baumgardt et al. 2000 with p=0.83, and a spectral type O9.5Ib that is not a classical blue straggler). The paper acknowledges these limitations but does not show that the headline conclusion survives when only the secure stragglers (e.g., p≥0.9 or independently confirmed membership) are retained. Please provide such a robustness analysis or temper the abstract's claim to reflect the uncertainty in the target identifications.
  2. [Table 2 and Section 3.1] The definite detection for HD 62000 with the Fe mask is listed as ⟨Bz⟩ = -4±29 G, which is consistent with zero field; the only non-zero measurement is a marginal detection from the Ti mask (-111±43 G). As presented, this target does not support the statement that yellow stragglers possess fields of the order of a hundred Gauss, and it is unclear on what basis it is counted among the definite detections. Please clarify whether the Zeeman signature is robust and whether the summary counts should include this target; if the detection is real but the longitudinal field cancels due to geometry or line-blending, that should be explained explicitly.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title] The title contains a typo: 'straggler star s' should read 'straggler stars'.
  2. [Section 2 and Table 2] Section 2 describes the sample as six BSSs and two YSSs, but after the reclassification of HD 65032 as a YSS (Sect. 3.3) the sample becomes five BSSs and three YSSs; the text should be internally consistent about this reclassification.
  3. [Table 2 and Section 3.3] The FAP value for HD 65032 on the first epoch is listed as 0.5×10^-5 and flagged as 'MD', but 0.5×10^-5 = 5×10^-6 is below the 10^-5 threshold for a definite detection defined in Section 3. Please correct this inconsistency or explain the labeling; the same issue appears in the text where this measurement is described as marginal.
  4. [Abstract and Section 4] The statement that no relationship is found between the presence or strength of the magnetic field and cluster characteristics is based on only eight stars with heterogeneous sampling (different line masks, single versus multiple epochs). This null result should be explicitly described as preliminary, as the authors themselves note later in Section 4, rather than stated without qualification in the abstract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is an observational spectropolarimetric survey with externally benchmarked reduction and detection criteria; its central claim does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an empirical detection claim, not a derivation: mean longitudinal magnetic fields are measured from HARPSpol Stokes V spectra via the LSD technique following Donati et al. (1997), with line data from VALD3 and fixed FAP thresholds from Donati et al. (1992). The target selection is independent of the measured quantity: BSS/YSS status comes from the Gaia DR2-based catalogue of Rain et al. (2021) or from earlier external catalogues (Ahumada & Lapasset 2007; Baumgardt et al. 2000), and the magnetic-field measurements use spectral masks and polarimetric signals that do not enter the straggler classification. No parameter is fitted to a subset and then renamed as a prediction, and no target quantity is defined in terms of the result. The paper's own caveats about weak cluster membership or the reclassification of HD 65032 as a YSS from Gaia colours affect the robustness of the astrophysical interpretation, not the logical independence of the measurement from the conclusion. Self-citations to Hubrig et al. (2013, 2023) concern reduction procedures and comparative statements about magnetic binaries; they are methodological or contextual, not load-bearing uniqueness claims, and the main interpretive framework also rests on independent theoretical work (e.g., Schneider et al. 2019; Tout et al. 2008; Ferrario et al. 2009). Consequently, no circularity step can be exhibited with the required specificity, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The paper reports magnetic field measurements of known stars and suggests a speculative connection between Ap-star binaries and BSSs, but postulates no new particles, forces, or conserved quantities. The main load-bearing assumptions are the validity of the LSD method for these stars, the straggler classification, the stellar origin of the Zeeman signatures, and the mutual consistency of the quoted significance estimates.

free parameters (1)
  • LSD line mask selection = Multiple element masks per star (Fe, Ti, Si, HeCSi, FeTi, SiCr, HeC, CNNeSi, HeNOSi, He), chosen post hoc
    Different masks yield different Bz values and detection flags (e.g., HD 62000: -4±29 G with Fe vs -111±43 G with Ti; HD 101545: 69±17 G with HeNOSi vs 82±16 G with He). The choice of mask is an analyst degree of freedom that affects the reported central result.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The LSD technique with VALD3 line masks recovers the mean longitudinal magnetic field under the weak-field approximation.
    Invoked in Sect. 3 to extract Bz from all stars; the assumption that the Zeeman signal is a scaled first moment of the line profile is standard but is not independently verified for these specific targets.
  • domain assumption The targets are genuine blue or yellow stragglers belonging to the stated open clusters.
    Target selection follows Rain et al. (2021) and Ahumada & Lapasset (2007); membership probabilities for HD 61954 (0.8) and HD 62329 (0.5) are not conclusive, and HD 65032 is reclassified as a YSS from Gaia colors (Sect. 2, 3.3).
  • domain assumption Observed Stokes V signatures are stellar in origin rather than artifacts of unresolved binarity, pulsation, or instrument.
    Null spectra are checked and non-detections are reported, but for single-epoch targets (HD 87222, HD 87266, HD 62000) the absence of variability checks leaves room for phase-dependent or companion-related contamination (Sect. 3).
  • domain assumption The quoted FAP values and Bz error bars are mutually consistent and correctly computed.
    Table 2 contains apparent contradictions: HD 65032 has FAP=0.5e-5 flagged MD while the criterion defines FAP<=1e-5 as definite; HD 87222 has Bz=-133±7 G (a 19-sigma value) but FAP=8.8e-4, flagged MD. The reported significances therefore do not align with the stated thresholds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The incidence of magnetism in blue and yellow straggler stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XO2LJIVI

@misc{pith2026250902304,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The incidence of magnetism in blue and yellow straggler stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XO2LJIVI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02304}
}
read the original abstract

Our understanding of the generation of magnetic fields in intermediate-mass and massive OBA stars remains limited. Some theories have proposed that their magnetic fields could be a result of strong binary interactions, including stellar mergers. Blue stragglers, which lie well beyond the main sequence turn-off point on the colour-magnitude diagram of stellar clusters, are widely theorised to be merger products or interacting binaries and therefore can be considered excellent test targets to get insights into the origin of magnetic fields in stars with radiative envelopes. We search for the presence of magnetic fields in a sample of blue and yellow stragglers listed in the Gaia DR2-based catalogue of blue stragglers in open clusters. We measured the mean longitudinal magnetic field from HARPSpol spectra of five blue stragglers and three yellow stragglers using the least-squares deconvolution technique. We present the first observational evidence that blue and yellow stragglers possess magnetic fields of the order of a hundred to a few hundred Gauss. The targets in our sample belong to open clusters of very different ages and metallicities, but we do not detect any relationship between the presence or strength of the detected magnetic field and the cluster characteristics. For the first time, using high-resolution spectropolarimetric observations, a definite detection of a magnetic field is achieved in a Be-shell star, HD61954. The two yellow stragglers, HD62329 and HD65032, appear to be members in binary systems, whereas the blue straggler HD62775 is possibly a triple system. HD62329 and HD65032 exhibit in their spectra weak Nd III 6145 lines, which are usually prominent in magnetic Ap and Bp stars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02304 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Line profiles of various lines observed in the HARPSpol spectra of HD 61954 obtained on two different nights. −0.01 0.00 0.01 2xN/IC Si −0.01 0.00 0.01 2xV/IC −50 0 50 100 Velocity [km s−1] 0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 I/IC HD 61954 H 2024−01−02 −0.01 0.00 0.01 2xN/IC HeCSi −0.01 0.00 0.01 2xV/IC −50 0 50 100 150 200 Velocity [km s−1] 0.88 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 I/IC HD 61954 H 2024−01−06 [PITH_FULL_IM… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. LSD analysis results, Stokes I, V, and diagnostic null N spec￾tra, obtained for different line masks using HARPSpol observations of HD 61954 on two different nights in January 2024. The identified Zee￾man signatures are presented in a blue colour. 4840 4860 4880 4900 4920 Wavelength [Å] 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Normalised Flux Hβ 4861 Å Fe II 4924 Å 5180 5182 5184 5186 5188 5190 5192 Wavelength [Å] 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Normal… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. As [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: As [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: As [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: As [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Spectra of our late-B and A-type targets in the spectral regions containing the spectral lines Nd iii 6145.1 and Priii 6195.6. For compar￾ison, we show in the bottom the spectrum of the typical Ap star γ Equ. Importantly, magnetic A and late-B type stars, generally ca…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Something new under the Sun: A magnetically driven CH/CN anti-correlation

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The solar magnetic cycle produces a CH/CN anti-correlation in the integrated solar spectrum, which the authors scale up to argue that surface magnetism could mimic globular cluster multi-population signatures.

  2. Examining the stellar-merger origin of the blue main sequence in the open cluster NGC\,3532 with N-body simulations

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    N-body models of NGC 3532 produce only 0-8 stellar mergers, too few to explain the cluster's ~37% blue main-sequence population, disfavoring the merger origin for its slow rotators.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Abt, H. A. 1985, ApJ, 294, L103

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    & Lapasset, E

    Ahumada, J. & Lapasset, E. 1995, A&AS, 109, 375

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Ahumada, J. A. & Lapasset, E. 2007, A&A, 463, 789

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    S., Zorec, J., & Panei, J

    Aidelman, Y ., Cidale, L. S., Zorec, J., & Panei, J. A. 2015, A& A, 577, A45

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    D., Mason, E., et al

    Bagnulo, S., Landstreet, J. D., Mason, E., et al. 2006, A&A, 4 50, 777

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    & Chalonge, D

    Barbier, D. & Chalonge, D. 1941, Annales d’Astrophysique, 4 , 30

    work page 1941

  7. [7]

    J., Corti, M

    Baume, G., Rodríguez, M. J., Corti, M. A., Carraro, G., & Pane i, J. A. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 411

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    2000, A&AS, 146, 25 1

    Baumgardt, H., Dettbarn, C., & Wielen, R. 2000, A&AS, 146, 25 1

    work page 2000

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Cannon, A. J. & Pickering, E. C. 1993

    1993

  2. [10]

    2002, A&A, 394, 1 51

    Carrier, F., North, P ., Udry, S., & Babel, J. 2002, A&A, 394, 1 51

    2002

  3. [11]

    & Divan, L

    Chalonge, D. & Divan, L. 1952, Annales d’Astrophysique, 15, 201

    1952

  4. [12]

    S., Monteiro, H., Moitinho, A., et al

    Dias, W. S., Monteiro, H., Moitinho, A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 5 04, 356

    2021

  5. [13]

    F., Semel, M., Carter, B

    Donati, J. F., Semel, M., Carter, B. D., Rees, D. E., & Collier Cameron, A. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 658

    1997

  6. [14]

    F., Semel, M., & Rees, D

    Donati, J. F., Semel, M., & Rees, D. E. 1992, A&A, 265, 669

    1992

  7. [15]

    E., Tout, C

    Ferrario, L., Pringle, J. E., Tout, C. A., & Wickramasinghe, D. T. 2009, MNRAS, 400, L71

    2009

  8. [16]

    J., Sana, H., Mahy, L., et al

    Frost, A. J., Sana, H., Mahy, L., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 21 4 Gaia Collaboration. 2022

    2024

  9. [17]

    Ghazaryan, S., Alecian, G., & Hakobyan, A. A. 2019, MNRAS, 48 7, 5922 González, J. F. & Lapasset, E. 2001, AJ, 121, 2657

    2019

  10. [18]

    2009, Astronomische Nachrichten, 330, 317

    Hubrig, S., Briquet, M., De Cat, P ., et al. 2009, Astronomische Nachrichten, 330, 317

    2009

  11. [19]

    2008, A&A, 488, 287

    Hubrig, S., Briquet, M., Morel, T., et al. 2008, A&A, 488, 287

    2008

  12. [20]

    F., Ilyin, I., et al

    Hubrig, S., González, J. F., Ilyin, I., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, A90

    2012

  13. [21]

    2013, Astr onomische Nachrichten, 334, 1093

    Hubrig, S., Ilyin, I., Schöller, M., & Lo Curto, G. 2013, Astr onomische Nachrichten, 334, 1093

    2013

  14. [22]

    P ., Ilyin, I., & Schöller, M

    Hubrig, S., Järvinen, S. P ., Ilyin, I., & Schöller, M. 2022, A pJ, 933, 27

    2022

  15. [23]

    P ., Ilyin, I., Schöller, M., & Jayar aman, R

    Hubrig, S., Järvinen, S. P ., Ilyin, I., Schöller, M., & Jayar aman, R. 2023, MN- RAS, 521, 6228

    2023

  16. [24]

    P ., Madej, J., et al

    Hubrig, S., Järvinen, S. P ., Madej, J., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 47 7, 3791

    2018

  17. [25]

    & Mathys, G

    Hubrig, S. & Mathys, G. 1995, Comments on Astrophysics, 18, 1 67

    1995

  18. [26]

    P ., et al

    Hubrig, S., Schöller, M., Järvinen, S. P ., et al. 2024, A&A, 6 86, L4

    2024

  19. [27]

    V ., Pogodin, M., Schöller, M., & Peters , G

    Hubrig, S., Y udin, R. V ., Pogodin, M., Schöller, M., & Peters , G. J. 2007, As- tronomische Nachrichten, 328, 1133

    2007

  20. [28]

    Jadhav, V . V . & Subramaniam, A. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 1699 Järvinen, S. P ., Hubrig, S., Mathys, G., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 4 99, 2734

    2021

  21. [29]

    V ., Piskunov, A

    Kharchenko, N. V ., Piskunov, A. E., Hubrig, S., & Schöller, M . 2022, MNRAS, 515, 3094

    2022

  22. [30]

    & Kondo, M

    Kitamura, M. & Kondo, M. 1978, Ap&SS, 56, 341 Article number, page 8 of 9 S. Hubrig et al.: Magnetic blue and yellow stragglers

    1978

  23. [31]

    L., & V AMDC Collaboration

    Kupka, F., Dubernet, M. L., & V AMDC Collaboration. 2011, Baltic Astronomy, 20, 503

    2011

  24. [32]

    & Malaroda, S

    Levato, H. & Malaroda, S. 1975, AJ, 80, 807

    1975

  25. [33]

    Lloyd, C., Stickland, D., & Walborn, N. R. 1995, PASP , 107, 1030

    1995

  26. [34]

    M., Seggewiss, W., & Tueg, H

    Maitzen, H. M., Seggewiss, W., & Tueg, H. 1981, A&A, 96, 174

    1981

  27. [35]

    1988, The Messenger, 53, 39

    Mathys, G. 1988, The Messenger, 53, 39

    1988

  28. [36]

    2017, A&A, 601, A14

    Mathys, G. 2017, A&A, 601, A14

    2017

  29. [37]

    McCrea, W. H. 1964, MNRAS, 128, 147

    1964

  30. [38]

    & Fabrycky, D

    Naoz, S. & Fabrycky, D. C. 2014, ApJ, 793, 137

    2014

  31. [39]

    Negueruela, I., Simón-Díaz, S., de Burgos, A., Casasbuenas , A., & Beck, P . G. 2024, A&A, 690, A176

    2024

  32. [40]

    & Przybilla, N

    Nieva, M.-F. & Przybilla, N. 2014, A&A, 566, A7

    2014

  33. [41]

    M., et al

    Paunzen, E., Netopil, M., Maitzen, H. M., et al. 2014, A&A, 56 4, A42

    2014

  34. [42]

    Pendl, E. S. & Seggewiss, W. 1976, in IAU Colloq. 32: Physics o f Ap Stars, ed. W. W. Weiss, H. Jenkner, & H. J. Wood, 357

    1976

  35. [43]

    J., Ahumada, J

    Rain, M. J., Ahumada, J. A., & Carraro, G. 2021, A&A, 650, A67

    2021

  36. [44]

    & Manfroid, J

    Renson, P . & Manfroid, J. 2009, A&A, 498, 961

    2009

  37. [45]

    B., Wehlau, W

    Rice, J. B., Wehlau, W. H., & Holmgren, D. E. 1997, A&A, 326, 98 8

    1997

  38. [46]

    2006, A&A, 459, 137

    Rivinius, T., Štefl, S., & Baade, D. 2006, A&A, 459, 137

    2006

  39. [47]

    2011, MNRAS, 416, 817

    Sana, H., James, G., & Gosset, E. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 817

    2011

  40. [48]

    B., Lacour, S., et al

    Sana, H., Le Bouquin, J. B., Lacour, S., et al. 2014, ApJS, 215 , 15

    2014

  41. [49]

    Schneider, F. R. N., Ohlmann, S. T., Podsiadlowski, P ., et al . 2019, Nature, 574, 211

    2019

  42. [50]

    A., Wickramasinghe, D

    Tout, C. A., Wickramasinghe, D. T., Liebert, J., Ferrario, L ., & Pringle, J. E. 2008, MNRAS, 387, 897

    2008

  43. [51]

    Tutukov, A. V . & Fedorova, A. V . 2010, Astronomy Reports, 54,156

    2010

  44. [52]

    Walborn, N. R. 1979, PASP , 91, 442

    1979

  45. [53]

    2020, ApJ, 88 8, L12

    Wang, C., Langer, N., Schootemeijer, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 88 8, L12

    2020

  46. [54]

    & Ryu, T

    Wang, C. & Ryu, T. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.10314

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    T., Tout, C

    Wickramasinghe, D. T., Tout, C. A., & Ferrario, L. 2014, MNRA S, 437, 675 Article number, page 9 of 9

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.