Hierarchical Low-Altitude Wireless Network Empowered Air Traffic Management

Dusit Niyato; Fuhui Zhou; Jia He; Ligang Yuan; Qihui Wu; Qiuming Zhu; Yuanhao Cui; Zhu Han; Ziye Jia

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 15 references

Hierarchical Low-Altitude Wireless Network Empowered Air Traffic Management

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A hierarchical low-altitude wireless network can route dense drone traffic through 3D corridors and avoid collisions using multi-modal monitoring.

desk verdict A coherent, well-organized framework for low-altitude ATM, but its only quantitative validation ignores the wireless impairments its own architecture depends on. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03386 v1 pith:CP2Z423V submitted 2025-09-03 cs.NI

Ziye Jia , Jia He , Yuanhao Cui , Qiuming Zhu , Ligang Yuan , Fuhui Zhou , Qihui Wu , Dusit Niyato

show 1 more author

Zhu Han

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.NI

keywords hierarchicallow-altitudewirelessnetworkaircorridordesigncollisionavoidancemulti-modalmonitoringADS-B5G-Advancedaerialsafetytrafficmanagement

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that low-altitude airspace—below about 3,000 meters—can be managed as a hierarchical wireless network rather than an extension of traditional air traffic control. It argues that dividing the airspace into layered 3D corridors, monitoring aircraft through fused 5G-A, ADS-B, RID, and GNSS feeds, and resolving conflicts with a four-tier avoidance mechanism can make dense mixed drone and eVTOL traffic safe while improving use of the airspace. A simplified simulation at a corridor intersection shows that the envelope-based avoidance can achieve very high success rates for small aircraft counts, with success decreasing as the safety envelope or traffic density grows. The value is a concrete design language—grids, envelopes, corridors, monitoring fusion—for regulators and engineers planning low-altitude operations.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the layered HLWN architecture built on two objects. The first is the 3D grid-discretized air corridor: coarse vertical layers and fine horizontal cubes make airspace a discrete occupancy space with one aircraft per cube, turning conflicts into geometric separations. The second is the dual-envelope aircraft model: an inner physical envelope (true airframe shape) and an outer safety envelope (dynamic buffer). Collision avoidance runs on these through four tiers—single-agent heading/speed/altitude adjustment, local coordinated path changes, corridor switching, and global multi-objective optimization—using velocity-obstacle reasoning and a conflict matrix of angle, heig

What would settle it

In the same 1,000 m × 1,000 m × 400 m intersection scenario, add emulated communication failures—for example, 100–200 ms added latency or 10–20% packet loss on the 5G-A and ADS-B feeds feeding the avoidance tiers—and record the collision-avoidance success probability for four aircraft at a 5 m safety envelope. If the probability drops from the reported 100%, the assumption of uninterrupted low-latency monitoring is falsified. A field version would fly two converging aircraft through an urban canyon with active RID interference and see whether the corridor-switching logic triggers before the sa

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the proposed hierarchical low-altitude wireless network (HLWN) can guarantee safe operation and optimize low-altitude resource utilization through three-dimensional spatial discretization and integrated wireless monitoring. The framework structures airspace into coarse-grained vertical layers and fine-grained horizontal grids that define four corridor types—horizontal, vertical, high-speed, and safety corridors—with one-way traffic, consistent speeds, safe intervals, and one aircraft per grid cube. Each aircraft is wrapped in a dual envelope: a physical envelope matching its true shape and a safety envelope providing a temporal warning buffer. On this geomet

Load-bearing premise

The central safety claim assumes the multi-modal wireless monitoring (5G-A, ADS-B, RID, and GNSS) always provides accurate, current aircraft positions fast enough for the avoidance tiers to act; if coverage gaps, interference, or latency break that data stream, the corridor separation and envelope-based avoidance logic can fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Low-altitude airspace becomes regulatable as a road network: one-way corridors, entry/exit rules, speed norms, and buffer zones can be defined and enforced through geofences and monitoring.
The dual-envelope model gives a common geometric language for collision-risk calculation across aircraft with very different shapes, from small drones to eVTOLs.
Multi-modal monitoring coverage and data-rate gaps can be closed by switching among RID, ADS-B, 5G-A, and satellite links, making situational awareness available in both dense urban and remote areas.
The success-probability tradeoff with envelope size implies an operational tuning knob: smaller safety envelopes allow more aircraft per corridor, but only while monitoring accuracy is high.
The four-tier avoidance hierarchy lets immediate local maneuvers handle fast conflicts while reserving global rerouting for deadlocks, so safety actions scale with traffic density.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's safety numbers assume the monitoring feeds are accurate and timely; a natural extension is to rerun the converging-trajectory simulation with stochastic latency, packet loss, or sensor noise on the 5G-A/ADS-B channels, which the paper does not model.
The 'one aircraft per cube' rule implies a corridor capacity bound that the paper does not compute; it could be derived from cube dimensions, safety envelope, and required spacing to quantify density limits.
The envelope-size tradeoff could be turned into a control problem: choose the minimal safety envelope per aircraft class given localization error and response latency, a synthesis the paper leaves open.
The HLWN framework could be stress-tested against the failure of one monitoring modality (e.g., RID interference or GNSS outage) to see whether redundancy alone preserves the avoidance guarantee; this is not tested in the case study.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know this paper is a system architecture proposal, not a results paper. It puts a hierarchical low-altitude wireless network (HLWN) at the center of low-altitude ATM, combining stratified corridor design, multi-modal monitoring (5G-A, ADS-B, RID, GNSS), envelope-based safety, and a four-tier collision avoidance stack. The integration of those pieces is the genuinely new part; individually they are known in the corridor and UTM literature, and the paper says so. As a synthesis, it is clearly organized and reads as a competent framework-plus-taxonomy. The figures are helpful.

What it does well: it identifies real challenges, structures the airspace into corridor types, defines flight rules and envelopes, and lays out a plausible division of labor between local and global conflict resolution. That is a useful reference for anyone building a low-altitude network.

The soft spot is the case study. Section IV-C is the only quantitative validation, and it validates none of the wireless layer. Aircraft follow predefined trajectories that converge at a single waypoint; the collision-avoidance probabilities in Fig. 5 are geometric counting under perfect state information. The radio parameters in that section are listed but never coupled to the avoidance simulation. No latency, packet loss, sensor noise, or coverage gaps enter the model, even though Section IV-A explicitly names those as challenges. So the abstract's phrase "guarantee safe operation" is not supported. The stress-test note put it correctly: the central mechanism is absent from the only numerical experiment. This is a real weakness, but it doesn't sink the paper if the authors reframe it as a system description with an illustrative scenario rather than a validated safety result.

The soundness issue is proportionality. The framework claims are qualitative; the math is simple. There are no error bars, no baseline, and no statistical variation, but that is consistent with a positioning paper. The authors are transparent in the open issues section and do not overcite their own work in a problematic way.

Who is this for? Researchers working on low-altitude ATM and UAV corridor design who want a structured architecture to react to. It deserves a serious referee, with the expectation of a major revision: temper the guarantee language, either connect the case study to a communication model or call it a demonstration, and add a comparison to at least one existing corridor proposal.

I'd accept it for peer review. It is coherent, new in its integration, and useful to a niche but growing community.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a Hierarchical Low-Altitude Wireless Network (HLWN) framework for low-altitude air traffic management. The framework combines 3D spatial discretization into air corridors, multi-modal wireless monitoring (GNSS, 5G-A, ADS-B, RID), aircraft envelope-based safety models, a four-tier collision avoidance mechanism, and open research directions. The authors report a MATLAB case study at a 3D corridor intersection, presenting probabilities of successful collision avoidance as a function of safety-envelope size and aircraft number, and comparing range/data rate of the monitoring modes.

Significance. If the framework and its quantitative claims were rigorously supported, the paper would be relevant to the emerging low-altitude economy and the design of future air-traffic-management systems. Its strength is the comprehensive taxonomy of components — corridor types, dual envelopes, monitoring modes, and hierarchical avoidance tiers — and the identification of open problems such as environmental complexity, multi-modal cooperation, and security. The paper does not provide machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations; its contribution is conceptual and architectural. The main quantitative validation, however, is currently decoupled from the wireless mechanisms that are central to the framework, so the safety claims are not established.

major comments (3)

[Section IV-C, Fig. 5] The collision-avoidance probability is not well-defined. The text reports percentages such as 100% for N=4 at small envelopes, but gives no model of the probability, no number of simulation runs, no statistical variation, and no baseline comparison. The scenario uses predefined trajectories that exactly converge at one waypoint, so the percentages appear to be deterministic outcomes of a single geometric experiment. As the only quantitative support for the abstract's 'guarantee safe operation' claim, this is load-bearing. Please either derive the probability model, provide confidence intervals, or explicitly reframe the numbers as illustrative rather than empirical validation.
[Section IV-A vs. Section IV-C] The simulation assumes perfect wireless monitoring. Section IV-A lists real impairments — 5G-A obstruction by urban infrastructure, satellite latency, RID interference — yet none of these enter the case study. The radio parameters listed in Section IV-C (frequencies, powers, bandwidths) are never connected to the avoidance simulation; no packet loss, latency, sensor noise, update interval, or measurement error is modeled. Since multi-modal monitoring is the core enabler of the HLWN safety architecture, the validation is decoupled from the mechanism it claims to validate. At minimum, state that the results are ideal upper bounds under perfect state information, and ideally add a sensitivity study with realistic communication non-idealities.
[Section IV-B, Fig. 4] The four-tier collision avoidance mechanism is described only qualitatively. Terms such as 'consensus-based optimization', 'multi-objective combinatorial optimization', and 'conflict matrix' are introduced without formal problem statements, algorithmic details, or properties (e.g., convergence, deadlock avoidance, safety guarantees). The paper's wording that HLWN can 'guarantee secure, orderly, and scalable air traffic management' (Section II) is therefore not supported by analysis. If the paper is intended as a vision/architecture paper, the claims should be tempered; if it claims a technical contribution, the mechanisms need formalization.

minor comments (6)

[Throughout] The plural 'aircrafts' should be 'aircraft' throughout the manuscript.
[Abstract] The term 'HLAN' appears in the last sentence; it should be 'HLWN'.
[Fig. 2] 'devision' is a typo for 'division'.
[Fig. 5] The 'Critical safety envelope' line is not explained in the text. Please define how it is determined.
[Fig. 6] The mapping from bars to monitoring modes is ambiguous. Specify which bar corresponds to RID, 5G-A, ADS-B, and SAT, and state whether the data rates are from standards or representative values.
[Section II] 'the 5th generation advanced (5G-A)' would be more standard as '5G-Advanced (5G-A)'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the case study is a self-contained simulation, and self-citations are background only.

full rationale

The paper's central framework is a design/architecture proposal, not a derivation chain that reduces to its inputs. The self-citations ([4], [8], [9], [15]) are used for background statements such as 'high collision risks', '5G-A networks deliver ultra-low latency', and 'complex electromagnetic interference environment'. These are not load-bearing derivations; the framework does not rely on an unverified uniqueness theorem or a fitted parameter from the authors' prior work. The quantitative case study (Section IV-C) is a MATLAB simulation with predefined converging trajectories and a defined safety envelope. The reported collision-avoidance probabilities are computed from the simulated geometry and the proposed avoidance logic, not fitted to data. The monotonic decrease of success probability with envelope size is a direct consequence of the envelope definition, but the actual probability values are simulation outputs rather than equations that are identical to the inputs by construction. The paper does not 'predict' an external quantity from a fitted parameter; it demonstrates the mechanism on a toy scenario. One genuine weakness is that the case study omits the wireless non-idealities the paper itself acknowledges in Section IV-A ('signals of 5G-A may be obstructed by urban infrastructures, satellite communications suffer latency issues, and the frequencies of RID experience serious interferences'), and the simulation uses 'identical sets of the environmental factors'. That is a validity/support gap, not circularity. No circular step satisfying the quoted-evidence requirement was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The framework rests on a set of idealized domain assumptions about airspace structurability, aircraft discipline, and wireless reliability. The paper does not empirically validate these assumptions. No free parameters are fitted, but the simulation settings are chosen arbitrarily. The HLWN framework itself is an invented conceptual entity without independent evidence.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Low-altitude airspace (below 3,000 m) can be stratified into layers and fine-grained 3D grid units to separate air traffic.
This is the foundational assumption of the corridor model, stated in Section III-A and Figure 2, but never validated with real airspace data or regulatory constraints.
domain assumption Aircraft in a corridor maintain consistent velocity and one-way traffic, and each grid cube can hold only one aircraft at a time.
These corridor flight rules are specified in Section III-B, and the simulation implicitly relies on them for collision avoidance, but real aircraft maneuverability and navigation errors would violate these idealized rules.
domain assumption The multi-modal wireless monitoring system provides accurate real-time state information with negligible latency and no data loss.
Section IV-A describes the monitoring model as providing real-time situational awareness, but the paper acknowledges signal obstruction, latency, and interference as challenges; the simulation does not model these effects.
domain assumption In the case study, multiple aircraft have predefined trajectories that precisely converge at a single collision waypoint at the same arrival time.
This scenario, stated in Section IV-C, is a highly idealized collision condition and does not reflect typical airspace encounters with variable speeds, turns, or uncertainties.
domain assumption Safety envelopes can be modeled as simple geometric shapes that trigger evasive actions before physical contact.
Section III-C defines physical and safety envelopes, but the paper does not validate envelope sizes for different aircraft types or account for system uncertainties in the simulation.

invented entities (1)

Hierarchical Low-Altitude Wireless Network (HLWN) framework
purpose: To organize low-altitude airspace into layers, corridors, and monitoring capabilities for safe and efficient traffic management.
The HLWN is a conceptual architecture introduced by this paper. It is only illustrated and simulated in a simple scenario; no real-world deployment or independent empirical evidence is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hierarchical Low-Altitude Wireless Network Empowered Air Traffic Management." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CP2Z423V

@misc{pith2026250903386,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hierarchical Low-Altitude Wireless Network Empowered Air Traffic Management},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CP2Z423V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03386}
}

read the original abstract

As the increasing development of low-altitude aircrafts, the rational design of low-altitude networks directly impacts the aerial safety and resource utilization. To address the challenges of environmental complexity and aircraft diversity in the traffic management, we propose a hierarchical low-altitude wireless network (HLWN) framework. Empowered by the threedimensional spatial discretization and integrated wireless monitoring mechanisms in HLWN, we design low-altitude air corridors to guarantee safe operation and optimization. Besides, we develop the multi-dimensional flight risk assessment through conflict detection and probabilistic collision analysis, facilitating dynamic collision avoidance for heterogeneous aircrafts. Finally, the open issues and future directions are investigated to provide insights into HLAN development.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03386 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** An illustration of HLWN framework, composed of multiple layers, crossed corridors, heterogeneous aircrafts, sup [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** The grid segmentation based corridor design, including the vertical coarse-grained mesh division, and horizontal fine [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Collaborative monitoring for HLWN, supported by the low-altitude multi-modal monitoring and multi-dimensional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Collision avoidance based trajectory mechanisms for HLWN, including the base collision avoidance, local coordina [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Performance of collision avoidance. 1.77 km 7.66 km 27.57 km 472.06 km 1 Mbps 100 Mbps 450 bps 10 kbps RID 5G-A ADS-B SAT Monitoring modes 100 101 102 103 Effective range (km) 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 Data rate (bps) RID range 5G-A range ADS-B range SAT range Da…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Effective range/data rate versus monitoring mode. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

15 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

[1]

Unmanned aerial vehicles based low-altitude economy with lifecycle techno-economic-environmental analysis for sustainable and smart cities,

Y . Zhou, “Unmanned aerial vehicles based low-altitude economy with lifecycle techno-economic-environmental analysis for sustainable and smart cities,” J. Cleaner Prod. , vol. 499, p. 145050, Mar. 2025

work page 2025
[2]

Unauthorized UA V countermeasure for low-altitude economy: Joint communications and jamming based on MIMO cellular systems,

Z. Li, Z. Gao, K. Wang, Y . Mei, C. Zhu, L. Chen, X. Wu, and D. Niyato, “Unauthorized UA V countermeasure for low-altitude economy: Joint communications and jamming based on MIMO cellular systems,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 6659–6672, Mar. 2025

work page 2025
[3]

Multi-objective optimization for multi-UA V-assisted mobile edge computing,

G. Sun, Y . Wang, Z. Sun, Q. Wu, J. Kang, D. Niyato, and V . C. M. Leung, “Multi-objective optimization for multi-UA V-assisted mobile edge computing,” IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. , vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 14 803– 14 820, Aug. 2024

work page 2024
[4]

Three- dimension collision-free trajectory planning of UA Vs based on ADS-B information in low-altitude urban airspace,

C. Dong, Y . Zhang, Z. Jia, Y . Liao, L. Zhang, and Q. Wu, “Three- dimension collision-free trajectory planning of UA Vs based on ADS-B information in low-altitude urban airspace,” Chin. J. Aeronaut. , vol. 38, no. 2, p. 103170, Feb. 2025

work page 2025
[5]

Air corridors: Concept, design, sim- ulation, and rules of engagement,

S. I. Muna, S. Mukherjee, K. Namuduri, M. Compere, M. I. Akbas, P. Molnár, and R. Subramanian, “Air corridors: Concept, design, sim- ulation, and rules of engagement,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 1–18, Nov. 2021

work page 2021
[6]

Invited paper: Ground-based communication support for air corridors,

K. Prabhath, X. Sun, S. K. Jayaweera, D. Manu, K. Kakaraparty, S. Pallav, I. Mahbub, J. S. Mandapaka, S. Das Rochi, M. Meraz, and K. Namuduri, “Invited paper: Ground-based communication support for air corridors,” in IEEE 34th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) , Toronto, Canada, Sep. 2023

work page 2023
[7]

Optimizing cellular networks for UA V corridors via quantization theory,

S. Karimi-Bidhendi, G. Geraci, and H. Jafarkhani, “Optimizing cellular networks for UA V corridors via quantization theory,” IEEE Trans. Wire- less Commun. , vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 14 924–14 939, Jul. 2024

work page 2024
[8]

Sparse bayesian learning-based hierarchical construction for 3D radio environment maps incorporating channel shadowing,

J. Wang, Q. Zhu, Z. Lin, J. Chen, G. Ding, Q. Wu, G. Gu, and Q. Gao, “Sparse bayesian learning-based hierarchical construction for 3D radio environment maps incorporating channel shadowing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 14 560–14 574, Jul. 2024

work page 2024

Show all 15 references

[9]

From ground to sky: Architectures, applications, and challenges shaping low-altitude wireless networks,

W. Yuan, Y . Cui, J. Wang, F. Liu, G. Sun, T. Xiang, J. Xu, S. Jin, D. Niyato, S. Coleri, S. Sun, S. Mao, A. Jamalipour, D. I. Kim, M.-S. Alouini, and X. Shen, “From ground to sky: Architectures, applications, and challenges shaping low-altitude wireless networks,” https://arx...

2025 arXiv
[10]

A fixed air corridor model for UAS traffic management in urban areas,

A. E. Asslouj, H. Uppaluru, M. Ramezani, E. Atkins, and H. Rastgoftar, “A fixed air corridor model for UAS traffic management in urban areas,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. , vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 5651–5662, Oct. 2024

2024
[11]

Evaluating the impact of air corridors on the environment and public interests,

S. Wang, H. Liu, M. Rinaldi, and Y . P. Tsang, “Evaluating the impact of air corridors on the environment and public interests,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment , vol. 143, p. 104732, Jun. 2025

2025
[12]

Air corridor planning for urban drone delivery: Complexity analysis and comparison via multi- commodity network flow and graph search,

X. He, L. Li, Y . Mo, Z. Sun, and S. J. Qin, “Air corridor planning for urban drone delivery: Complexity analysis and comparison via multi- commodity network flow and graph search,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review , vol. 193, p. 103859, Jan. 2025

2025
[13]

A traffic control framework for uncrewed aircraft systems,

A. V . Gupta, A. P. Kattekola, A. V . Gupta, D. V . Abhiram, K. Namuduri, and R. Subramanian, “A traffic control framework for uncrewed aircraft systems,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications , Denver, CO, Jun. 2024, pp. 4518–4523

2024
[14]

Merging in air corridors using vehicle-to-vehicle communica- tions,

B. Dalloul, J. S. Mandapaka, L. McCorkendale, S. Nicoll, and K. Na- muduri, “Merging in air corridors using vehicle-to-vehicle communica- tions,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications , Denver, CO, Jun. 2024

2024
[15]

Embodied AI- empowered low altitude economy: Integrated sensing, communications, computation, and control (ISC3),

Y . Yang, Y . Chen, J. Wang, G. Sun, and D. Niyato, “Embodied AI- empowered low altitude economy: Integrated sensing, communications, computation, and control (ISC3),” https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.19996, Dec. 2024

2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Unmanned aerial vehicles based low-altitude economy with lifecycle techno-economic-environmental analysis for sustainable and smart cities,

Y . Zhou, “Unmanned aerial vehicles based low-altitude economy with lifecycle techno-economic-environmental analysis for sustainable and smart cities,” J. Cleaner Prod. , vol. 499, p. 145050, Mar. 2025

work page 2025

[2] [2]

Unauthorized UA V countermeasure for low-altitude economy: Joint communications and jamming based on MIMO cellular systems,

Z. Li, Z. Gao, K. Wang, Y . Mei, C. Zhu, L. Chen, X. Wu, and D. Niyato, “Unauthorized UA V countermeasure for low-altitude economy: Joint communications and jamming based on MIMO cellular systems,” IEEE Internet Things J. , vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 6659–6672, Mar. 2025

work page 2025

[3] [3]

Multi-objective optimization for multi-UA V-assisted mobile edge computing,

G. Sun, Y . Wang, Z. Sun, Q. Wu, J. Kang, D. Niyato, and V . C. M. Leung, “Multi-objective optimization for multi-UA V-assisted mobile edge computing,” IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. , vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 14 803– 14 820, Aug. 2024

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Three- dimension collision-free trajectory planning of UA Vs based on ADS-B information in low-altitude urban airspace,

C. Dong, Y . Zhang, Z. Jia, Y . Liao, L. Zhang, and Q. Wu, “Three- dimension collision-free trajectory planning of UA Vs based on ADS-B information in low-altitude urban airspace,” Chin. J. Aeronaut. , vol. 38, no. 2, p. 103170, Feb. 2025

work page 2025

[5] [5]

Air corridors: Concept, design, sim- ulation, and rules of engagement,

S. I. Muna, S. Mukherjee, K. Namuduri, M. Compere, M. I. Akbas, P. Molnár, and R. Subramanian, “Air corridors: Concept, design, sim- ulation, and rules of engagement,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 1–18, Nov. 2021

work page 2021

[6] [6]

Invited paper: Ground-based communication support for air corridors,

K. Prabhath, X. Sun, S. K. Jayaweera, D. Manu, K. Kakaraparty, S. Pallav, I. Mahbub, J. S. Mandapaka, S. Das Rochi, M. Meraz, and K. Namuduri, “Invited paper: Ground-based communication support for air corridors,” in IEEE 34th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) , Toronto, Canada, Sep. 2023

work page 2023

[7] [7]

Optimizing cellular networks for UA V corridors via quantization theory,

S. Karimi-Bidhendi, G. Geraci, and H. Jafarkhani, “Optimizing cellular networks for UA V corridors via quantization theory,” IEEE Trans. Wire- less Commun. , vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 14 924–14 939, Jul. 2024

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Sparse bayesian learning-based hierarchical construction for 3D radio environment maps incorporating channel shadowing,

J. Wang, Q. Zhu, Z. Lin, J. Chen, G. Ding, Q. Wu, G. Gu, and Q. Gao, “Sparse bayesian learning-based hierarchical construction for 3D radio environment maps incorporating channel shadowing,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 14 560–14 574, Jul. 2024

work page 2024