Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Ferromagnetism vs. Antiferromagnetism in Narrow-Band Systems: Competition Between Quantum Geometry and Band Dispersion

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For a half-filled narrow band, the magnetic ground state is set by the competition between the band's quantum geometry and its dispersion, and this paper derives the exact stability condition.

desk verdict Serious, self-contained derivation of an effective spin model for narrow bands, but the central quantitative phase boundary is not yet justified: the paper's own spin-stiffness calculation gives a different transition, and the main-text formula has a factor-of-2 inconsistency with its appendix. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03575 v2 pith:V3GCCRGJ submitted 2025-09-03 cond-mat.str-el

Haoyu Hu , Oskar Vafek , Kristjan Haule , B. Andrei Bernevig This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords narrowbandsquantumgeometryferromagnetismantiferromagnetismeffectivespinmodelflatHubbardbanddispersion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Half-filled narrow bands can order either ferromagnetically or antiferromagnetically, and this paper gives a single framework that says which and why. It derives an effective spin model from the Hubbard model and finds three contributions to the magnetic coupling: a wavefunction-only term that is ferromagnetic, a dispersion-only term that is antiferromagnetic, and a mixed term of either sign. The central quantitative claim is a Hessian formula: the ferromagnetic state is stable exactly while the band's quantum-geometry tensor outweighs its dispersion tensor in a ratio set by the interaction. The paper tests this criterion on a bilayer square-lattice model and reports that the predicted phase boundary matches Hartree-Fock numerics. If right, it turns a magnetic phase question in moiré and flat-band materials into a band-structure calculation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the pair of tensors Q_mu,nu (quantum geometry: momentum-space curvature and spread of the narrow-band wavefunctions) and M_mu,nu (dispersion: averages of products of band-velocity components). These generate the real-space overlap matrices A, B, and C whose norms feed the spin couplings J1, J2, and J3. The decisive formula is H_mu,nu = A U (Q_mu,nu/8 − M_mu,nu/(4 A^4 U^2)); ferromagnetism survives while H is positive definite. The derivation machinery is an expansion of the Hubbard-model action in the non-local part of the Green's function around a local-moment saddle point, which produces a Berry-phase term plus the spin-spin action.

What would settle it

Run exact diagonalization or quantum Monte Carlo on the paper's bilayer square-lattice toy model at half filling, scanning the bandwidth t and the geometric parameter ζ across the predicted boundary Q = 2D²/U². If the ferromagnet remains stable beyond that line, or collapses before it, the Hessian criterion is not the full story; the paper's spin-stiffness calculation suggests the exact boundary may sit a factor of order A² away. A material analogue would be tuning twist angle or interlayer coupling and watching whether the magnetic ordering wavevector switches where the formula says it should

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that for a half-filled narrow band with local Hubbard repulsion, magnetism is controlled by a three-way decomposition of the effective exchange coupling: a wavefunction-only ferromagnetic term, a dispersion-only antiferromagnetic term, and a mixed term of either sign (Eq. 9). In the single-narrow-band, all-flavors-equivalent case, the ferromagnetic state is stable precisely while the Hessian H = A U (Q/8 − M/(4A⁴U²)) is positive definite, where Q is the band's quantum-geometric tensor and M measures dispersion. In the flat-band limit the only surviving coupling is ferromagnetic, recovering the established mechanism of flat-band ferromagnetism; in the single-orbital atomic li

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative boundary relies on interactions involving more than two spins at a time being negligible, and the paper's own stiffness calculation shows those interactions shift the boundary.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a given material, deciding the magnetic order reduces to computing two band-structure tensors; no empirical exchange constants are needed.
  • A perfectly flat but geometrically non-trivial band is ferromagnetic at half filling, so quantum geometry is not a small correction but the ordering drive.
  • The boundary Q ≈ 2M/(A⁴U²) sets a single dimensionless threshold; pushing a system across it by strain, twist, or pressure should flip the magnetic order.
  • Because the mixed coupling J3 is non-universal in sign, the competition can produce frustration and possibly non-collinear or spiral order where geometry and dispersion are finely balanced.
  • The framework extends beyond the equivalent-flavor case to multi-orbital narrow-band systems, where the same three terms are evaluated from the full Bloch matrices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's two-spin model and its spin-stiffness calculation give different transition lines (Q = 2M/(A⁴U²) versus Q = M/(AU)²); if the stiffness criterion is the physical one, quantitative applications of Eq. 13 will need a factor correction.
  • The same competition should apply to any half-filled narrow band where local moments form, including topological bands, since the criterion uses only the geometric tensor and not the Chern number.
  • A practical design rule follows: materials with large wavefunction spread and curvature but small Fermi velocities are more likely to be ferromagnetic, while dispersive narrow bands lean antiferromagnetic.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unified effective-spin description of magnetism in half-filled narrow bands, starting from a multi-orbital Hubbard model and expanding the exact Hubbard-Stratonovich action in the non-local single-particle Green's function G'. The main result is the spin-spin coupling of Eq. (9), decomposed into a geometry-induced ferromagnetic term, a dispersion-induced antiferromagnetic term, and a non-universal mixed term. From the Hessian of the q=0 spin-wave energy, the paper proposes the quantitative FM-AFM criterion H_{\mu\nu}=AU(Q_{\mu\nu}/8 - M_{\mu\nu}/(4A^4U^2)) (Eq. 13), with FM stable when H is positive definite. The criterion is tested against unrestricted Hartree-Fock on a bilayer square-lattice toy model with independently tunable quantum metric and bandwidth, reporting a phase boundary Q=2D^2/U^2 that agrees with the numerics.

Significance. If correct, Eq. (13) is an appealing parameter-free microscopic criterion connecting magnetic order to quantum geometry and band dispersion only. The framework is self-contained, reproduces conventional superexchange in the single-orbital atomic limit (S4), and recovers flat-band ferromagnetism when dispersion vanishes (S5). The supplement contains a detailed derivation and the toy-model Hartree-Fock benchmark is a genuine independent check. However, the quantitative central claim is currently undermined by an internal mismatch between the truncated two-spin model and the paper's own full spin-stiffness calculation, as well as by a factor-of-two inconsistency between the main-text Eq. (9) and the supplement's derivation (S100). These issues are load-bearing and must be resolved before the criterion can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [S6/S7, Eq. (S166) vs Eq. (13)] The paper's own spin-stiffness calculation in S7, performed from the full action Eq. (S34) without the two-spin truncation, gives a Goldstone-mode dispersion E_q \approx UA(Q_{\mu\nu} - M_{\mu\nu}/(AU)^2)q_\mu q_\nu (Eq. S166), hence an FM instability when Q < M/(AU)^2. Eq. (13), derived from the truncated spin model, predicts instability when Q < 2M/(A^4U^2). For the toy model A=1/2 these thresholds differ by a factor of 8. S7 explicitly attributes the difference to multi-spin terms omitted from Eq. (9). Since the main text uses Eq. (13) as the analytic phase boundary in Fig. 2, the truncation is not a parametrically small correction; the central quantitative claim needs either a controlled derivation from the full action or a clear explanation of why the Hessian criterion, rather than the stiffness criterion, determines the HF phase boundary.
  2. [Eq. (9) vs S3/S100] Main-text Eq. (9) is internally inconsistent with the supplement by a factor of two: it lists J^1 = -(U/4)|A|^2 and J^2 = |B|^2/(A^4 U), while the derivation in S3, Eq. (S100), gives -(U/8)|A|^2 and |B|^2/(2A^4 U). The Hessian result Eq. (13) and the phase boundary Q=2D^2/U^2 used in Fig. 2 follow from the supplement coefficients, not from Eq. (9) as printed. Thus the central equations of the main text cannot be used to reproduce Eq. (13). This must be corrected and all prefactors checked for consistency.
  3. [S3/S6, expansion in G'] The expansion in the non-local Green's function G' is not controlled. No small parameter is identified, and in the toy model the inter-layer matrix element A_{R,+;R,-} \sim J_0(\zeta) is O(1) for \zeta \sim 1, so G' between nearby sites is not generally small relative to G_loc. The statement that multi-spin terms are 'expected to be less relevant' is therefore an assumption, and the S7 comparison shows that these omitted terms change the transition by an O(1) factor that depends on A. The manuscript should identify a concrete control parameter or benchmark the truncation against the untruncated action in the regime where Eq. (13) is used.
  4. [S6, Eq. (S135) and eigenvector assumption] The derivation of Eq. (13) relies on two uncontrolled approximations: (i) the lowest eigenvector of J(q=0) is assumed to remain uniform, v_a=1/\sqrt{n_sub}, once dispersion is added (text after Eq. S123); and (ii) the term Q_{\mu\nu}(k)\alpha_k is dropped as higher order in \delta\epsilon/U (Eq. S135). At the transition the two retained terms Q_{\mu\nu}/8 and M_{\mu\nu}/(4A^4U^2) are comparable, so dropping Q\alpha_k is justified only when \delta\epsilon^2/U^2 \ll 1. This condition is not guaranteed by the stated U \gg D regime. These approximations should be stated explicitly and their validity checked against the numerical phase diagram, or the formula revised.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (8) and S92] The second Green's function in the product is printed as G'_{x_j,x_j}, but by definition G' has (1-\delta_{x_i,x_j}), so G'_{x_j,x_j}=0. It should almost certainly be G'_{x_j,x_i}; this typo also appears in S92 and should be corrected.
  2. [S6] The sentence 'where we have ignored the \tau-dependency of , \bar{n}_{x_i} fields' contains a stray comma and a notation artifact; please clean up all such remnants.
  3. [S1/S3] 'Hubbard-Startonovich' is a typo for 'Hubbard-Stratonovich'.
  4. [Fig. 2] The figure caption and main text should state the values of U and v used in the Hartree-Fock calculation (the supplement says U=10, v=50) and indicate how the numerical boundary compares to the analytic curve at larger Q or D where the expansion is expected to degrade.
  5. [Eq. (1)] The kinetic term is written with a sum over R,R' but then uses c^\dagger_{k,a,\sigma} c_{k,b,\sigma}; please make the notation uniform (real-space or momentum-space) to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the effective spin model and Hessian criterion are derived from the microscopic Hubbard model with no fitted parameters; toy-model numerics serve as a benchmark, and self-citations are contextual.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. Starting from the Hubbard–Stratonovich exact action (S1), the paper expands in the non-local Green's function G' (Eq. 5, S2–S3) to obtain the effective spin couplings (Eq. 9 / S100). No parameter is fit: J1, J2, J3 are explicit functions of the non-interacting Bloch wavefunctions and dispersions (A, B, C defined in Eq. 9/S95). The FM–AFM criterion Eq. 13 is obtained in S6 by expanding the momentum-space spin coupling around q=0; Q and M are independent band-structure inputs (Eq. 3), not outputs fitted to the HF data. The toy-model Hartree–Fock phase diagram (Fig. 2/S8) is used to benchmark the analytic boundary, not to fix any coefficient. Self-citations (e.g., Refs [56–59,82,83,112–117,127]) appear as contextual agreement ('consistent with...') and are not load-bearing; the derivation does not invoke a uniqueness theorem or imported ansatz from those works. The paper itself flags a substantive limitation in S7: 'the spin model derived in Eq. (S99) captures only two-body interaction terms, neglecting higher-order spin interactions... As a result, it cannot fully reproduce the exact spin stiffness of the ferromagnetic state.' It concedes that the exact stiffness transition differs from the truncated-model transition. This is an internal consistency/control concern, not a circular reduction: Eq. 13 is an approximation, not an input. There is also a factor-of-2 mismatch between main-text Eq. 9 and the S3/S100 expressions for J1/J2, but both are derived quantities, and neither makes the prediction equal to its own input. No circular step, fitted input mislabeled as prediction, or self-citation chain forcing the result is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation introduces no free parameters fitted to data. It rests on the narrow-band limit, a set of truncations in G' and δϵ/U, and several ad-hoc assumptions about the Hessian calculation. The most fragile are the uncontrolled G' expansion and the neglect of multi-spin terms, which the paper itself shows affects the quantitative transition.

assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper The non-local Green's function G' can be treated as a small expansion parameter.
    The entire gradient expansion (S2-S3) is based on this. No small parameter is identified; for a narrow band with non-trivial quantum geometry, G' between nearby sites is of the same order as G_loc, so the truncation is uncontrolled.
  • domain assumption The narrow-band dispersion satisfies |δϵ_k|/U << 1, allowing expansion to second order in δϵ/U.
    Stated as the strong-coupling regime D << U in the introduction and used in S3 to expand the Green's functions and the spin coupling.
  • domain assumption The local density of states of the narrow band is approximated as ρ_a(ε) ≈ A_a δ(ε).
    S2, Eq. S55. This projects onto the flat-band limit and neglects dispersion in the local Green's function at zeroth order.
  • ad hoc to paper The lowest-energy eigenvector of J(q=0) remains uniform, v_a = 1/√n_sub, when finite dispersion is introduced.
    S6, stated as an expectation for |δϵ|/U << 1; no proof is given, and it is load-bearing for the Hessian calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper The term Q_{μν}(k) α_k is dropped in the Hessian calculation as higher order.
    S6, after Eq. S135. This approximation is valid only in the assumed scaling where Q and δϵ^2/U^2 are of the same order; it is not rigorously controlled.
  • ad hoc to paper Multi-spin interactions beyond two-spin level do not affect the magnetic ordering and can be neglected.
    Main text after Eq. 8 and S3. The paper's own S7 shows these terms change the stiffness and the transition criterion, so this assumption is questionable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ferromagnetism vs. Antiferromagnetism in Narrow-Band Systems: Competition Between Quantum Geometry and Band Dispersion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V3GCCRGJ

@misc{pith2026250903575,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ferromagnetism vs. Antiferromagnetism in Narrow-Band Systems: Competition Between Quantum Geometry and Band Dispersion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V3GCCRGJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03575}
}
read the original abstract

Magnetism in narrow-band systems arises from the interplay between electronic correlations, quantum geometry, and band dispersion. In particular, both ferro and anti-ferro magnets are known to occur as ground states of (different) models featuring narrow bands. This poses the question of which is favored and under what conditions. In this work, we present a unified theoretical framework to investigate spin physics within narrow bands. By deriving an effective spin model, we show that the non-atomic wavefunction of the narrow bands generally favors ferromagnetic ordering, while band dispersion promotes antiferromagnetic correlations. We find that the competition between these effects gives rise to a tunable magnetic phase and rich spin phenomena. Our approach offers a systematic way to study the magnetic properties of narrow-band systems, integrating the roles of wave function, band structure, and correlation effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.03575 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Panel (a) illustrates a narrow-band system, where a narrow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Hartree Fock phase diagram of the toy model defined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Orbital magnetization reveals multiband topology

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The quantum-geometric part of orbital magnetic susceptibility fingerprints multiband Euler topology, providing a proposed doping-dependent experimental probe.

  2. Functional renormalization group for extremely correlated electrons

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Strong-coupling FRG for the U=∞ Hubbard model shows bandwidth and quasiparticle residue decreasing with density, polaronic continua, bad-metal behavior with magnetic correlations, and Luttinger theorem violation above...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [22]

    Evidence for Dirac flat band superconductivity enabled by quantum geometry,

    Haidong Tian, Xueshi Gao, Yuxin Zhang, Shi Che, Tianyi Xu, Patrick Cheung, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Mohit Randeria, Fan Zhang, Chun Ning Lau, and Marc W. Bockrath, “Evidence for Dirac flat band superconductivity enabled by quantum geometry,” Nature 614, 440–444 (2023)

    2023

  2. [23]

    Revealing the Thermal Properties of Super- conducting Magic-Angle Twisted Bilayer Graphene,

    Giorgio Di Battista, Paul Seifert, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Kin Chung Fong, Alessandro Principi, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Revealing the Thermal Properties of Super- conducting Magic-Angle Twisted Bilayer Graphene,” Nano Lett. 22, 6465–6470 (2022)

    2022

  3. [24]

    Spectroscopy of Twisted Bilayer Graphene Correlated Insulators,

    Dumitru C ˘alug˘aru, Nicolas Regnault, Myungchul Oh, Kevin P. Nuckolls, Dillon Wong, Ryan L. Lee, Ali Yazdani, Oskar Vafek, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Spectroscopy of Twisted Bilayer Graphene Correlated Insulators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 117602 (2022)

    2022

  4. [25]

    The marvels of moir ´e materials,

    Eva Y . Andrei, Dmitri K. Efetov, Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, Al- lan H. MacDonald, Kin Fai Mak, T. Senthil, Emanuel Tutuc, Ali Yazdani, and Andrea F. Young, “The marvels of moir ´e materials,” Nat. Rev. Mater.6, 201–206 (2021)

    2021

  5. [26]

    Moir´e Flat Bands in Twisted Double Bilayer Graphene,

    Fatemeh Haddadi, QuanSheng Wu, Alex J. Kruchkov, and Oleg V . Yazyev, “Moir´e Flat Bands in Twisted Double Bilayer Graphene,” Nano Lett. 20, 2410–2415 (2020)

    2020

  6. [27]

    Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir ´e flat bands,

    Leon Balents, Cory R. Dean, Dmitri K. Efetov, and Andrea F. Young, “Superconductivity and strong correlations in moir ´e flat bands,” Nat. Phys. 16, 725–733 (2020)

    2020

  7. [28]

    Cor- related insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices,

    Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Ahmet Demir, Shiang Fang, Spencer L. Tomarken, Jason Y . Luo, Javier D. Sanchez- Yamagishi, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Efthimios Kaxiras, Ray C. Ashoori, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Cor- related insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices,” Nature 556, 80–84 (2018)

    2018

  8. [29]

    Maximized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Alexander Kerelsky, Leo J. McGilly, Dante M. Kennes, Lede Xian, Matthew Yankowitz, Shaowen Chen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, James Hone, Cory Dean, Angel Rubio, and Abhay N. Pasupathy, “Maximized electron interactions at the magic angle in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature 572, 95–100 (2019)

    2019

Show all 110 references
  1. [30]

    Spectroscopic signatures of many-body correlations in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Yonglong Xie, Biao Lian, Berthold J ¨ack, Xiaomeng Liu, Cheng-Li Chiu, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, B. An- drei Bernevig, and Ali Yazdani, “Spectroscopic signatures of many-body correlations in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature 572, 101–105 (2019)

    2019

  2. [31]

    Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Aaron L. Sharpe, Eli J. Fox, Arthur W. Barnard, Joe Finney, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and David Goldhaber-Gordon, “Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene,” Science 365, 605–608 (2019)

    2019

  3. [32]

    Charge order and broken rotational symmetry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Yuhang Jiang, Xinyuan Lai, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Kristjan Haule, Jinhai Mao, and Eva Y . Andrei, “Charge order and broken rotational symmetry in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature 573, 91–95 (2019)

    2019

  4. [33]

    Electronic corre- lations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle,

    Youngjoon Choi, Jeannette Kemmer, Yang Peng, Alex Thom- son, Harpreet Arora, Robert Polski, Yiran Zhang, Hechen Ren, Jason Alicea, Gil Refael, Felix von Oppen, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Stevan Nadj-Perge, “Electronic corre- lations in twisted bilayer graphene near...

    2019

  5. [34]

    Large linear-in-temperature resistivity in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Hryhoriy Polshyn, Matthew Yankowitz, Shaowen Chen, Yux- uan Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Cory R. Dean, and Andrea F. Young, “Large linear-in-temperature resistivity in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nat. Phys. 15, 1011–1016 (2019)

    2019

  6. [35]

    In- trinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moir´e heterostruc- ture,

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y . Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, “In- trinsic quantized anomalous Hall effect in a moir´e heterostruc- ture,” Science 367, 900–903 (2020)

    2020

  7. [36]

    Tun- able correlated Chern insulator and ferromagnetism in a moir´e superlattice,

    Guorui Chen, Aaron L. Sharpe, Eli J. Fox, Ya-Hui Zhang, Shaoxin Wang, Lili Jiang, Bosai Lyu, Hongyuan Li, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Zhiwen Shi, T. Senthil, David Goldhaber-Gordon, Yuanbo Zhang, and Feng Wang, “Tun- able correlated Chern insulator and ferromagnetism in...

    2020

  8. [37]

    Cas- cade of electronic transitions in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Dillon Wong, Kevin P. Nuckolls, Myungchul Oh, Biao Lian, Yonglong Xie, Sangjun Jeon, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Ali Yazdani, “Cas- cade of electronic transitions in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature 582, 198–202 (2020)

    2020

  9. [38]

    Tracing out Correlated Chern Insulators in Magic Angle Twisted Bilayer Graphene,

    Youngjoon Choi, Hyunjin Kim, Yang Peng, Alex Thom- son, Cyprian Lewandowski, Robert Polski, Yiran Zhang, Harpreet Singh Arora, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Ja- son Alicea, and Stevan Nadj-Perge, “Tracing out Correlated Chern Insulators in Magic Angle Twisted Bilayer Grap...

    2008 arXiv

  10. [39]

    Strongly correlated Chern insulators in magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Kevin P. Nuckolls, Myungchul Oh, Dillon Wong, Biao Lian, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Ali Yazdani, “Strongly correlated Chern insulators in magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature 588, 610–615 (2020)

    2020

  11. [40]

    Correlation-driven topo- logical phases in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Youngjoon Choi, Hyunjin Kim, Yang Peng, Alex Thom- son, Cyprian Lewandowski, Robert Polski, Yiran Zhang, Harpreet Singh Arora, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Ja- son Alicea, and Stevan Nadj-Perge, “Correlation-driven topo- logical phases in magic-angle twisted bilayer grap...

    2021

  12. [41]

    Hofstadter subband ferromagnetism and symmetry-broken Chern insulators in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Yu Saito, Jingyuan Ge, Louk Rademaker, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Dmitry A. Abanin, and Andrea F. Young, “Hofstadter subband ferromagnetism and symmetry-broken Chern insulators in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nat. Phys. 17, 478–481 (2021)

    2021

  13. [42]

    Tuning electron correlation in magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene using Coulomb screening,

    Xiaoxue Liu, Zhi Wang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Oskar Vafek, and J. I. A. Li, “Tuning electron correlation in magic- angle twisted bilayer graphene using Coulomb screening,” Science 371, 1261–1265 (2021)

    2021

  14. [43]

    Flavour Hund’s cou- pling, Chern gaps and charge diffusivity in moir ´e graphene,

    Jeong Min Park, Yuan Cao, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Flavour Hund’s cou- pling, Chern gaps and charge diffusivity in moir ´e graphene,” Nature 592, 43–48 (2021)

    2021

  15. [44]

    Chern insulators, van Hove singulari- ties and topological flat bands in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Shuang Wu, Zhenyuan Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and Eva Y . Andrei, “Chern insulators, van Hove singulari- ties and topological flat bands in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nat. Mater. 20, 488–494 (2021)

    2021

  16. [45]

    Nematicity and 7 competing orders in superconducting magic-angle graphene,

    Yuan Cao, Daniel Rodan-Legrain, Jeong Min Park, Noah F. Q. Yuan, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Rafael M. Fernan- des, Liang Fu, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Nematicity and 7 competing orders in superconducting magic-angle graphene,” Science 372, 264–271 (2021)

    2021

  17. [46]

    Symmetry-broken Chern insulators and Rashba-like Landau-level crossings in magic- angle bilayer graphene,

    Ipsita Das, Xiaobo Lu, Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Zhi- Da Song, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Symmetry-broken Chern insulators and Rashba-like Landau-level crossings in magic- angle bilayer graphene,” Nat. Phys. 17, 710–714 (2021)

    2021

  18. [47]

    Imaging orbital ferromagnetism in a moir´e Chern insulator,

    C. L. Tschirhart, M. Serlin, H. Polshyn, A. Shragai, Z. Xia, J. Zhu, Y . Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. E. Huber, and A. F. Young, “Imaging orbital ferromagnetism in a moir´e Chern insulator,” Science 372, 1323–1327 (2021)

    2021

  19. [48]

    Unconventional sequence of correlated Chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Andrew T. Pierce, Yonglong Xie, Jeong Min Park, Eslam Kha- laf, Seung Hwan Lee, Yuan Cao, Daniel E. Parker, Patrick R. Forrester, Shaowen Chen, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Ashvin Vishwanath, Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, and Amir Yacoby, “Unconventional sequence of correlated ...

    2021

  20. [49]

    Competing Zero-Field Chern Insulators in Superconducting Twisted Bilayer Graphene,

    Petr Stepanov, Ming Xie, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Xiaobo Lu, Allan H. MacDonald, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Competing Zero-Field Chern Insulators in Superconducting Twisted Bilayer Graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 197701 (2021)

    2021

  21. [50]

    Interaction-driven band flattening and correlated phases in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Youngjoon Choi, Hyunjin Kim, Cyprian Lewandowski, Yang Peng, Alex Thomson, Robert Polski, Yiran Zhang, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jason Alicea, and Stevan Nadj-Perge, “Interaction-driven band flattening and correlated phases in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nat. Phys.17, ...

    2021

  22. [51]

    Fractional Chern insu- lators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Yonglong Xie, Andrew T. Pierce, Jeong Min Park, Daniel E. Parker, Eslam Khalaf, Patrick Ledwith, Yuan Cao, Se- ung Hwan Lee, Shaowen Chen, Patrick R. Forrester, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Ashvin Vishwanath, Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, and Amir Yacoby, “Fractional Chern insu...

    2021

  23. [52]

    Ipsita Das, Cheng Shen, Alexandre Jaoui, Jonah Herzog- Arbeitman, Aaron Chew, Chang-Woo Cho, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Benjamin A. Piot, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Observation of Reentrant Correlated Insulators and Interaction-Driven Fermi-Surface Reco...

    2022

  24. [53]

    Quantum textures of the many-body wavefunctions in magic-angle graphene,

    Kevin P. Nuckolls, Ryan L. Lee, Myungchul Oh, Dillon Wong, Tomohiro Soejima, Jung Pyo Hong, Dumitru C˘alug˘aru, Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, B. Andrei Bernevig, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Nicolas Regnault, Michael P. Zale- tel, and Ali Yazdani, “Quantum textures of the ma...

    2023

  25. [54]

    Spin skyrmion gaps as signatures of strong-coupling insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Jiachen Yu, Benjamin A. Foutty, Yves H. Kwan, Mark E. Bar- ber, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Zhi-Xun Shen, Sid- dharth A. Parameswaran, and Benjamin E. Feldman, “Spin skyrmion gaps as signatures of strong-coupling insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nat....

    2023 arXiv

  26. [55]

    Fege as a building block for the kagome 1:1, 1:6:6, and 1:3:5 families: Hidden d-orbital decoupling of flat band sectors, effective models, and interaction hamiltoni- ans,

    Yi Jiang, Haoyu Hu, Dumitru C ˘alug˘aru, Claudia Felser, San- tiago Blanco-Canosa, Hongming Weng, Yuanfeng Xu, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Fege as a building block for the kagome 1:1, 1:6:6, and 1:3:5 families: Hidden d-orbital decoupling of flat band sectors, effective models, a...

    2025

  27. [56]

    Superfluid weight bounds from symmetry and quantum geometry in flat bands,

    Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Valerio Peri, Frank Schindler, Se- bastian D. Huber, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Superfluid weight bounds from symmetry and quantum geometry in flat bands,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 087002 (2022)

    2022

  28. [57]

    Ferromagnetic ground states for the hub- bard model on line graphs,

    Andreas Mielke, “Ferromagnetic ground states for the hub- bard model on line graphs,” Journal of Physics A: Mathemati- cal and General 24, L73 (1991)

    1991

  29. [58]

    Ferromagnetism in the hubbard model on line graphs and further considerations,

    Andreas Mielke, “Ferromagnetism in the hubbard model on line graphs and further considerations,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 24, 3311 (1991)

    1991

  30. [59]

    Exact ground states for the hubbard model on the kagome lattice,

    A Mielke, “Exact ground states for the hubbard model on the kagome lattice,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Gen- eral 25, 4335 (1992)

    1992

  31. [60]

    Topological flat bands in frustrated kagome lattice CoSn,

    Mingu Kang, Shiang Fang, Linda Ye, Hoi Chun Po, Jonathan Denlinger, Chris Jozwiak, Aaron Bostwick, Eli Rotenberg, Efthimios Kaxiras, Joseph G. Checkelsky, and Riccardo Comin, “Topological flat bands in frustrated kagome lattice CoSn,” Nature Communications 11, 4004 (2020), pub...

    2020

  32. [61]

    Observation of Topological Flat Bands in the Kagome Semiconductor Nb3Cl8,

    Zhenyu Sun, Hui Zhou, Cuixiang Wang, Shiv Kumar, Daiyu Geng, Shaosheng Yue, Xin Han, Yuya Haraguchi, Kenya Shi- mada, Peng Cheng, Lan Chen, Youguo Shi, Kehui Wu, Sheng Meng, and Baojie Feng, “Observation of Topological Flat Bands in the Kagome Semiconductor Nb3Cl8,” Nano Lette...

    2022

  33. [62]

    Non-Fermi liquid behaviour in a correlated flat-band py- rochlore lattice,

    Jianwei Huang, Lei Chen, Yuefei Huang, Chandan Setty, Bin Gao, Yue Shi, Zhaoyu Liu, Yichen Zhang, Turgut Yilmaz, Elio Vescovo, Makoto Hashimoto, Donghui Lu, Boris I. Yakob- son, Pengcheng Dai, Jiun-Haw Chu, Qimiao Si, and Ming Yi, “Non-Fermi liquid behaviour in a correlated fl...

    2024

  34. [63]

    Catalogue of flat-band stoichiometric materials,

    Nicolas Regnault, Yuanfeng Xu, Ming-Rui Li, Da-Shuai Ma, Milena Jovanovic, Ali Yazdani, Stuart S. P. Parkin, Claudia Felser, Leslie M. Schoop, N. Phuan Ong, Robert J. Cava, Luis Elcoro, Zhi-Da Song, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Catalogue of flat-band stoichiometric materials,” Nat...

    2022

  35. [64]

    General construction and topological classification of crys- talline flat bands,

    Dumitru C ˘alug˘aru, Aaron Chew, Luis Elcoro, Yuanfeng Xu, Nicolas Regnault, Zhi-Da Song, and B Andrei Bernevig, “General construction and topological classification of crys- talline flat bands,” Nature Physics 18, 185–189 (2022)

    2022

  36. [65]

    Topological flat bands in twisted trilayer graphene,

    Zhen Ma, Shuai Li, Ya-Wen Zheng, Meng-Meng Xiao, Hua Jiang, Jin-Hua Gao, and X. C. Xie, “Topological flat bands in twisted trilayer graphene,” Science Bulletin 66, 18–22 (2021)

    2021

  37. [66]

    FeGe as a building block for the kagome 1:1, 1:6:6, and 1:3:5 families: Hidden $d$-orbital decoupling of flat band sectors, effective models, and interaction Hamil- tonians,

    Yi Jiang, Haoyu Hu, Dumitru C ˘alug˘aru, Claudia Felser, San- tiago Blanco-Canosa, Hongming Weng, Yuanfeng Xu, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “FeGe as a building block for the kagome 1:1, 1:6:6, and 1:3:5 families: Hidden $d$-orbital decoupling of flat band sectors, effective models,...

    2025

  38. [67]

    Artificial flat band systems: from lattice models to experiments,

    Daniel Leykam, Alexei Andreanov, and Sergej Flach, “Artificial flat band systems: from lattice models to experiments,” Advances in Physics: X 3, 1473052 (2018), publisher: Taylor & Francis eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2018.1473052

    2018

  39. [68]

    Band touching from real-space topology in frustrated hopping mod- els,

    Doron L. Bergman, Congjun Wu, and Leon Balents, “Band touching from real-space topology in frustrated hopping mod- els,” Physical Review B 78, 125104 (2008), publisher: Amer- ican Physical Society

    2008

  40. [69]

    De- coding flat bands from compact localized states,

    Yuge Chen, Juntao Huang, Kun Jiang, and Jiangping Hu, “De- coding flat bands from compact localized states,” Science Bul- letin 68, 3165–3171 (2023). 8

    2023

  41. [70]

    Twisted bilayer graphene. I. Matrix elements, ap- proximations, perturbation theory, and a⃗k·⃗ ptwo-band model,

    B. Andrei Bernevig, Zhi-Da Song, Nicolas Regnault, and Biao Lian, “Twisted bilayer graphene. I. Matrix elements, ap- proximations, perturbation theory, and a⃗k·⃗ ptwo-band model,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 205411 (2021)

    2021

  42. [71]

    All Magic Angles in Twisted Bi- layer Graphene are Topological,

    Zhida Song, Zhijun Wang, Wujun Shi, Gang Li, Chen Fang, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “All Magic Angles in Twisted Bi- layer Graphene are Topological,” Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 036401 (2019)

    2019

  43. [72]

    Topological flat band models with arbitrary Chern numbers,

    Shuo Yang, Zheng-Cheng Gu, Kai Sun, and S. Das Sarma, “Topological flat band models with arbitrary Chern numbers,” Physical Review B 86, 241112 (2012), publisher: American Physical Society

    2012

  44. [73]

    Junyeong Ahn, Sungjoon Park, and Bohm-Jung Yang, “Fail- ure of Nielsen-Ninomiya Theorem and Fragile Topology in Two-Dimensional Systems with Space-Time Inversion Sym- metry: Application to Twisted Bilayer Graphene at Magic An- gle,” Phys. Rev. X9, 021013 (2019)

    2019

  45. [74]

    Pseudo Landau level representation of twisted bilayer graphene: Band topology and implications on the correlated insulating phase,

    Jianpeng Liu, Junwei Liu, and Xi Dai, “Pseudo Landau level representation of twisted bilayer graphene: Band topology and implications on the correlated insulating phase,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 155415 (2019)

    2019

  46. [75]

    Band structure of twisted bilayer graphene: Emergent sym- metries, commensurate approximants, and Wannier obstruc- tions,

    Liujun Zou, Hoi Chun Po, Ashvin Vishwanath, and T. Senthil, “Band structure of twisted bilayer graphene: Emergent sym- metries, commensurate approximants, and Wannier obstruc- tions,” Phys. Rev. B98, 085435 (2018)

    2018

  47. [76]

    Faithful tight-binding models and fragile topology of magic- angle bilayer graphene,

    Hoi Chun Po, Liujun Zou, T. Senthil, and Ashvin Vishwanath, “Faithful tight-binding models and fragile topology of magic- angle bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. B99, 195455 (2019)

    2019

  48. [77]

    Landau level of fragile topology,

    Biao Lian, Fang Xie, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Landau level of fragile topology,” Phys. Rev. B102, 041402(R) (2020)

    2020

  49. [78]

    Landau lev- els in twisted bilayer graphene and semiclassical orbits,

    Kasra Hejazi, Chunxiao Liu, and Leon Balents, “Landau lev- els in twisted bilayer graphene and semiclassical orbits,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 035115 (2019)

    2019

  50. [79]

    Contrasting lattice geometry dependent versus independent quantities: Ramifica- tions for berry curvature, energy gaps, and dynamics,

    Steven H. Simon and Mark S. Rudner, “Contrasting lattice geometry dependent versus independent quantities: Ramifica- tions for berry curvature, energy gaps, and dynamics,” Phys. Rev. B 102, 165148 (2020)

    2020

  51. [80]

    Quantum-geometric dipole: a topologi- cal boost to flavor ferromagnetism in flat bands,

    Lei Chen, Sayed Ali Akbar Ghorashi, Jennifer Cano, and Valentin Cr ´epel, “Quantum-geometric dipole: a topologi- cal boost to flavor ferromagnetism in flat bands,” (2025), arXiv:2506.22417 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025

  52. [81]

    Magic-Angle Twisted Bilayer Graphene as a Topological Heavy Fermion Problem,

    Zhi-Da Song and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Magic-Angle Twisted Bilayer Graphene as a Topological Heavy Fermion Problem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 047601 (2022)

    2022

  53. [82]

    Twisted bilayer graphene. III. Interacting Hamil- tonian and exact symmetries,

    B. Andrei Bernevig, Zhi-Da Song, Nicolas Regnault, and Biao Lian, “Twisted bilayer graphene. III. Interacting Hamil- tonian and exact symmetries,” Phys. Rev. B 103, 205413 (2021)

    2021

  54. [83]

    Twisted bi- layer graphene. V. Exact analytic many-body excitations in Coulomb Hamiltonians: Charge gap, Goldstone modes, and absence of Cooper pairing,

    B. Andrei Bernevig, Biao Lian, Aditya Cowsik, Fang Xie, Nicolas Regnault, and Zhi-Da Song, “Twisted bi- layer graphene. V. Exact analytic many-body excitations in Coulomb Hamiltonians: Charge gap, Goldstone modes, and absence of Cooper pairing,” Phys. Rev. B103, 205415 (2021)

    2021

  55. [84]

    Quantum geometry and stability of moir ´e flatband ferromagnetism,

    Fengcheng Wu and S Das Sarma, “Quantum geometry and stability of moir ´e flatband ferromagnetism,” Physical Review B 102, 165118 (2020)

    2020

  56. [85]

    Flat bands, strange metals and the Kondo effect,

    Joseph G. Checkelsky, B. Andrei Bernevig, Piers Coleman, Qimiao Si, and Silke Paschen, “Flat bands, strange metals and the Kondo effect,” Nature Reviews Materials 9, 509–526 (2024), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2024

  57. [86]

    Magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene as a topological heavy fermion problem,

    Zhi-Da Song and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene as a topological heavy fermion problem,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 047601 (2022)

    2022

  58. [87]

    Theory of Superconductivity in LaRu$ 3$Si$ 2$ and Predic- tions of New Kagome Flat Band Superconductors,

    Junze Deng, Yi Jiang, Tiago F. T. Cerqueira, Haoyu Hu, Eeli O. Lamponen, Dumitru C ˘alug˘aru, Hanqi Pi, Zhijun Wang, Maia G. Vergniory, Emilia Morosan, Titus Neupert, S. Blanco-Canosa, Claudia Felser, Kristjan Haule, Miguel A. L. Marques, P ¨aivi T ¨orm¨a, and B. Andrei Bernev...

    2025 arXiv

  59. [88]

    Emergent flat band and topo- logical Kondo semimetal driven by orbital-selective correla- tions,

    Lei Chen, Fang Xie, Shouvik Sur, Haoyu Hu, Silke Paschen, Jennifer Cano, and Qimiao Si, “Emergent flat band and topo- logical Kondo semimetal driven by orbital-selective correla- tions,” Nature Communications 15, 5242 (2024), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2024

  60. [89]

    Metallic quantum criti- cality enabled by flat bands in a kagome lattice,

    Lei Chen, Fang Xie, Shouvik Sur, Haoyu Hu, Silke Paschen, Jennifer Cano, and Qimiao Si, “Metallic quantum criti- cality enabled by flat bands in a kagome lattice,” (2025), arXiv:2307.09431 [cond-mat]

    2025 arXiv

  61. [90]

    Evidence for Dirac flat band superconductivity enabled by quantum geometry,

    Haidong Tian, Xueshi Gao, Yuxin Zhang, Shi Che, Tianyi Xu, Patrick Cheung, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Mohit Randeria, Fan Zhang, Chun Ning Lau, and Marc W. Bockrath, “Evidence for Dirac flat band superconductivity enabled by quantum geometry,” Nature 614, 440–444 (2023...

    2023

  62. [91]

    Fragile Topology and Flat-Band Superconduc- tivity in the Strong-Coupling Regime,

    Valerio Peri, Zhi-Da Song, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Sebas- tian D. Huber, “Fragile Topology and Flat-Band Superconduc- tivity in the Strong-Coupling Regime,” Physical Review Let- ters 126, 027002 (2021), publisher: American Physical Soci- ety

    2021

  63. [92]

    Heavy-fermion representation for twisted bilayer graphene systems,

    Hao Shi and Xi Dai, “Heavy-fermion representation for twisted bilayer graphene systems,” Phys. Rev. B 106, 245129 (2022)

    2022

  64. [93]

    Twisted bilayer graphene as topological heavy fermion: II. Analytical approximations of the model parameters,

    Dumitru C ˘alug˘aru, Maksim Borovkov, Liam L. H. Lau, Piers Coleman, Zhi-Da Song, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Twisted bilayer graphene as topological heavy fermion: II. Analytical approximations of the model parameters,” Low Temp. Phys. 49, 640–654 (2023)

    2023

  65. [94]

    Electronic Compress- ibility of Magic-Angle Graphene Superlattices,

    S. L. Tomarken, Y . Cao, A. Demir, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and R. C. Ashoori, “Electronic Compress- ibility of Magic-Angle Graphene Superlattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 046601 (2019)

    2019

  66. [95]

    Strange metal in magic-angle graphene with near planckian dissipation,

    Yuan Cao, Debanjan Chowdhury, Daniel Rodan-Legrain, Oriol Rubies-Bigorda, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, T. Senthil, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Strange metal in magic-angle graphene with near planckian dissipation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 076801 (2020)

    2020

  67. [96]

    Cas- cade of phase transitions and Dirac revivals in magic-angle graphene,

    U. Zondiner, A. Rozen, D. Rodan-Legrain, Y . Cao, R. Queiroz, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y . Oreg, F. von Op- pen, Ady Stern, E. Berg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and S. Ilani, “Cas- cade of phase transitions and Dirac revivals in magic-angle graphene,” Nature 582, 203–208 (2020)

    2020

  68. [97]

    Observation of flat bands in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Simone Lisi, Xiaobo Lu, Tjerk Benschop, Tobias A. de Jong, Petr Stepanov, Jose R. Duran, Florian Margot, Ir `ene Cuc- chi, Edoardo Cappelli, Andrew Hunter, Anna Tamai, Vik- tor Kandyba, Alessio Giampietri, Alexei Barinov, Johannes Jobst, Vincent Stalman, Maarten Leeuwenhoek, K...

    2021

  69. [98]

    Measuring local moir´e lattice heterogene- ity of twisted bilayer graphene,

    Tjerk Benschop, Tobias A. de Jong, Petr Stepanov, Xiaobo Lu, Vincent Stalman, Sense Jan van der Molen, Dmitri K. Efetov, and Milan P. Allan, “Measuring local moir´e lattice heterogene- ity of twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013153 (2021). 9

    2021

  70. [99]

    Heating freezes electrons in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Biao Lian, “Heating freezes electrons in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature 592, 191–193 (2021)

    2021

  71. [100]

    Entropic evidence for a Pomeranchuk effect in magic- angle graphene,

    Asaf Rozen, Jeong Min Park, Uri Zondiner, Yuan Cao, Daniel Rodan-Legrain, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Yuval Oreg, Ady Stern, Erez Berg, Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, and Shahal Ilani, “Entropic evidence for a Pomeranchuk effect in magic- angle graphene,” Nature 592, 214–219 (2021)

    2021

  72. [101]

    Isospin Pomeranchuk effect in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Yu Saito, Fangyuan Yang, Jingyuan Ge, Xiaoxue Liu, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, J. I. A. Li, Erez Berg, and An- drea F. Young, “Isospin Pomeranchuk effect in twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature 592, 220–224 (2021)

    2021

  73. [102]

    Multiple flat bands and topological Hofs- tadter butterfly in twisted bilayer graphene close to the second magic angle,

    Xiaobo Lu, Biao Lian, Gaurav Chaudhary, Benjamin A. Piot, Giulio Romagnoli, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Mar- tino Poggio, Allan H. MacDonald, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Multiple flat bands and topological Hofs- tadter butterfly in twisted bilayer graphen...

    2021

  74. [103]

    Observation of interband collective excitations in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Niels C. H. Hesp, Iacopo Torre, Daniel Rodan-Legrain, Pietro Novelli, Yuan Cao, Stephen Carr, Shiang Fang, Petr Stepanov, David Barcons-Ruiz, Hanan Herzig Sheinfux, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Dmitri K. Efetov, Efthimios Kaxi- ras, Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, Marco Polini,...

    2021

  75. [104]

    Symmetry- broken Josephson junctions and superconducting diodes in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    J. D ´ıez-M´erida, A. D´ıez-Carl´on, S. Y . Yang, Y .-M. Xie, X.-J. Gao, J. Senior, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Lu, A. P. Hig- ginbotham, K. T. Law, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Symmetry- broken Josephson junctions and superconducting diodes in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene...

    2023

  76. [105]

    Nonlin- ear intensity dependence of photogalvanics and photoconduc- tance induced by terahertz laser radiation in twisted bilayer graphene close to magic angle,

    S. Hubmann, P. Soul, G. Di Battista, M. Hild, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. K. Efetov, and S. D. Ganichev, “Nonlin- ear intensity dependence of photogalvanics and photoconduc- tance induced by terahertz laser radiation in twisted bilayer graphene close to magic angle,” Phys. R...

    2022

  77. [106]

    Breakdown of semiclassical descrip- tion of thermoelectricity in near-magic angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Bhaskar Ghawri, Phanibhusan S. Mahapatra, Manjari Garg, Shinjan Mandal, Saisab Bhowmik, Aditya Jayaraman, Rad- hika Soni, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, H. R. Kr- ishnamurthy, Manish Jain, Sumilan Banerjee, U. Chandni, and Arindam Ghosh, “Breakdown of semiclassical descrip...

    2022

  78. [107]

    Quantum critical behaviour in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Alexandre Jaoui, Ipsita Das, Giorgio Di Battista, Jaime D ´ıez- M´erida, Xiaobo Lu, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Hiroaki Ishizuka, Leonid Levitov, and Dmitri K. Efetov, “Quantum critical behaviour in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nat. Phys. 18, 633–638 (2022)

    2022

  79. [108]

    Interaction-driven giant thermopower in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Arup Kumar Paul, Ayan Ghosh, Souvik Chakraborty, Uj- jal Roy, Ranit Dutta, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Animesh Panda, Adhip Agarwala, Subroto Mukerjee, Sumilan Baner- jee, and Anindya Das, “Interaction-driven giant thermopower in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nat. Phys...

    2022

  80. [109]

    Chern mosaic and Berry- curvature magnetism in magic-angle graphene,

    Sameer Grover, Matan Bocarsly, Aviram Uri, Petr Stepanov, Giorgio Di Battista, Indranil Roy, Jiewen Xiao, Alexan- der Y . Meltzer, Yuri Myasoedov, Keshav Pareek, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Binghai Yan, Ady Stern, Erez Berg, Dmitri K. Efetov, and Eli Zeldov, “Chern mo...

    2022

  81. [110]

    Coexistence of recon- structed and unreconstructed structures in the structural tran- sition regime of twisted bilayer graphene,

    Xiao-Feng Zhou, Yi-Wen Liu, Chen-Yue Hao, Chao Yan, Qi Zheng, Ya-Ning Ren, Ya-Xin Zhao, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Lin He, “Coexistence of recon- structed and unreconstructed structures in the structural tran- sition regime of twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. ...

    2023

  82. [111]

    Nonlocal moments and mott semimetal in the chern bands of twisted bilayer graphene,

    Patrick J. Ledwith, Junkai Dong, Ashvin Vishwanath, and Eslam Khalaf, “Nonlocal moments and mott semimetal in the chern bands of twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. X 15, 021087 (2025)

    2025

  83. [112]

    Strong Coupling Phases of Par- tially Filled Twisted Bilayer Graphene Narrow Bands,

    Jian Kang and Oskar Vafek, “Strong Coupling Phases of Par- tially Filled Twisted Bilayer Graphene Narrow Bands,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 246401 (2019)

    2019

  84. [113]

    Geometric Origin of Superflu- idity in the Lieb-Lattice Flat Band,

    Aleksi Julku, Sebastiano Peotta, Tuomas I. Vanhala, Dong- Hee Kim, and P ¨aivi T¨orm¨a, “Geometric Origin of Superflu- idity in the Lieb-Lattice Flat Band,” Physical Review Letters 117, 045303 (2016), publisher: American Physical Society

    2016

  85. [114]

    Band geometry, Berry curva- ture, and superfluid weight,

    Long Liang, Tuomas I. Vanhala, Sebastiano Peotta, Topi Siro, Ari Harju, and P ¨aivi T ¨orm¨a, “Band geometry, Berry curva- ture, and superfluid weight,” Physical Review B 95, 024515 (2017)

    2017

  86. [115]

    Revisiting flat band superconductivity: Dependence on minimal quantum metric and band touchings,

    Kukka-Emilia Huhtinen, Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Aaron Chew, Bogdan A. Bernevig, and P ¨aivi T ¨orm¨a, “Revisiting flat band superconductivity: Dependence on minimal quantum metric and band touchings,” Physical Review B 106, 014518 (2022), publisher: American Physical Society

    2022

  87. [116]

    Superfluid Weight Bounds from Symmetry and Quantum Geometry in Flat Bands,

    Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Valerio Peri, Frank Schindler, Se- bastian D. Huber, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Superfluid Weight Bounds from Symmetry and Quantum Geometry in Flat Bands,” Physical Review Letters 128, 087002 (2022), publisher: American Physical Society

    2022

  88. [117]

    Many-Body Superconductivity in Topological Flat Bands,

    Jonah Herzog-Arbeitman, Aaron Chew, Kukka-Emilia Huhti- nen, P ¨aivi T ¨orm¨a, and B. Andrei Bernevig, “Many-Body Superconductivity in Topological Flat Bands,” (2022), arXiv:2209.00007 [cond-mat]

    2022 arXiv

  89. [118]

    Superfluidity in topolog- ically nontrivial flat bands,

    Sebastiano Peotta and P ¨aivi T¨orm¨a, “Superfluidity in topolog- ically nontrivial flat bands,” Nature Communications 6, 8944 (2015), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2015

  90. [119]

    Superconductivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems,

    P ¨aivi T ¨orm¨a, Sebastiano Peotta, and Bogdan A. Bernevig, “Superconductivity, superfluidity and quantum geometry in twisted multilayer systems,” Nature Reviews Physics 4, 528– 542 (2022), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2022

  91. [120]

    Geometric and conventional contribution to the superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene,

    Xiang Hu, Timo Hyart, Dmitry I. Pikulin, and Enrico Rossi, “Geometric and conventional contribution to the superfluid weight in twisted bilayer graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 237002 (2019)

    2019

  92. [121]

    Quantum metric and correlated states in two- dimensional systems,

    Enrico Rossi, “Quantum metric and correlated states in two- dimensional systems,” Current Opinion in Solid State and Ma- terials Science 25, 100952 (2021)

    2021

  93. [122]

    Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?

    P ¨aivi T¨orm¨a, “Essay: Where can quantum geometry lead us?” Physical Review Letters 131, 240001 (2023)

    2023

  94. [123]

    Quantum geometry in quantum materials,

    Jiabin Yu, B. Andrei Bernevig, Raquel Queiroz, Enrico Rossi, P¨aivi T ¨orm¨a, and Bohm-Jung Yang, “Quantum geometry in quantum materials,” (2025), arXiv:2501.00098 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2025 arXiv

  95. [124]

    Alexander Altland and Ben D Simons, Condensed matter field theory (Cambridge university press, 2010)

    2010

  96. [125]

    Naoto Nagaosa, Quantum field theory in strongly correlated electronic systems (Springer Science & Business Media, 1999)

    1999

  97. [126]

    Quantum spin fluctua- tions in an itinerant antiferromagnet,

    Avinash Singh and Zlatko Te ˇsanovi´c, “Quantum spin fluctua- tions in an itinerant antiferromagnet,” Phys. Rev. B41, 11457– 11465 (1990)

    1990

  98. [127]

    Particle-Hole Duality, Emergent Fermi Liquids, and Frac- tional Chern Insulators in Moir ´e Flatbands,

    Ahmed Abouelkomsan, Zhao Liu, and Emil J. Bergholtz, “Particle-Hole Duality, Emergent Fermi Liquids, and Frac- tional Chern Insulators in Moir ´e Flatbands,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 106803 (2020). 10

    2020

  99. [128]

    Heuristic bounds on superconduc- tivity and how to exceed them,

    Johannes S. Hofmann, Debanjan Chowdhury, Steven A. Kivelson, and Erez Berg, “Heuristic bounds on superconduc- tivity and how to exceed them,” npj Quantum Materials 7, 83 (2022)

    2022

  100. [129]

    Superconductivity, charge density wave, and supersolidity in flat bands with a tunable quantum metric,

    Johannes S. Hofmann, Erez Berg, and Debanjan Chowdhury, “Superconductivity, charge density wave, and supersolidity in flat bands with a tunable quantum metric,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 226001 (2023)

    2023

  101. [130]

    On how to count gold- stone bosons,

    Holger Bech Nielsen and S Chadha, “On how to count gold- stone bosons,” Nuclear Physics B 105, 445–453 (1976)

    1976

  102. [131]

    Unified descrip- tion of nambu-goldstone bosons without lorentz invariance,

    Haruki Watanabe and Hitoshi Murayama, “Unified descrip- tion of nambu-goldstone bosons without lorentz invariance,” Physical Review Letters 108, 251602 (2012). 11 Supplementary Materials CONTENTS References 5 S1. Model and effective action 12 S2. Interacting narrow bands 14 S3...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.