pith. sign in

arxiv: 2509.07250 · v3 · submitted 2025-09-08 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th

Scale dependence improvement of the quartic scalar field thermal effective potential in the optimized perturbation theory

Lucas G. C\^amara , Marcus Benghi Pinto , Rudnei O. Ramos This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 17:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-th
keywords variational renormalization groupoptimized perturbation theoryrenormalization group improvementthermal effective potentialscalar field theoryfinite temperaturephase transitionsscale dependence
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Combining renormalization group improvement with optimized perturbation theory reduces scale dependence in the thermal effective potential of the quartic scalar field.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a method that merges the renormalization group improvement prescription for the thermal effective potential with the variational resummation of optimized perturbation theory. This combined framework, called the variational renormalization group, is applied to the λφ⁴ scalar theory at finite temperature. The central goal is to reduce the unwanted dependence on the arbitrary renormalization scale that affects both plain perturbation theory and optimized perturbation theory alone. A sympathetic reader would care because stable results for the effective potential, critical temperature, and pressure are needed for reliable predictions of phase transitions in cosmology and condensed matter.

Core claim

The variational renormalization group approach, formed by combining renormalization group improvement with optimized perturbation theory resummation, produces significantly better scale stability than optimized perturbation theory alone when applied to the effective potential, critical temperature, and pressure of the finite-temperature λφ⁴ theory.

What carries the argument

The variational renormalization group, which directly combines the renormalization group improvement prescription for the thermal effective potential with the variational resummation technique of optimized perturbation theory.

Load-bearing premise

The renormalization group improvement prescription can be directly combined with the optimized perturbation theory variational resummation technique without introducing new inconsistencies or artifacts in the thermal effective potential of the λφ⁴ theory.

What would settle it

Numerical evaluation of the effective potential and derived quantities such as the critical temperature at several widely spaced renormalization scales (for example from 0.5T to 2T) to check whether the variation is substantially smaller with the new method than with optimized perturbation theory alone.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.07250 by Lucas G. C\^amara, Marcus Benghi Pinto, Rudnei O. Ramos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Feynman diagrams contributing to the effective po [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The pressure subtracted by the constant vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The pressure subtracted by the constant vacuum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Subtracted effective potential, ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The temperature dependent expectation value normalized by the tree-level vacuum value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The results for ln [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Subtracted effective potential, ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Perturbation theory, as well as most thermal field resummation methods widely used to study finite-temperature quantum field theories, presents a non-negligible renormalization scale dependence. To address this limitation, we propose an alternative method that combines the renormalization group improvement prescription for the thermal effective potential with the optimized perturbation theory variational resummation technique. Here, we apply this new framework, termed variational renormalization group, to evaluate the effective potential of the scalar $\lambda \phi^4$ theory at finite temperatures, which represents a benchmark model for phase transition studies. We show that the proposed approach significantly improves scale stability, compared to the use of optimized perturbation theory alone, across key thermodynamic quantities, including the effective potential, critical temperature, and pressure. These results establish the variational renormalization group as a robust alternative tool for precision studies of thermal phase transitions, with direct implications for cosmological applications (e.g., early-Universe thermodynamics) and condensed matter systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a 'variational renormalization group' framework that combines the renormalization group improvement prescription with optimized perturbation theory (OPT) variational resummation to compute the thermal effective potential of the λφ⁴ theory. The central claim is that this combination yields significantly improved renormalization-scale stability for the effective potential, critical temperature, and pressure relative to OPT alone.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the method could offer a practical route to reduced scale artifacts in thermal resummation calculations for scalar theories, with relevance to early-universe phase transitions and condensed-matter systems. The numerical demonstrations of improved stability constitute the main strength, though the absence of an explicit analytic proof that the combined stationarity condition eliminates residual μ dependence limits the immediate impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Derivation of the combined effective potential and optimization condition] The central claim requires that RG running of couplings can be inserted into the OPT variational procedure without spoiling the principle of minimal sensitivity. No analytic demonstration is given that the stationarity condition ∂V/∂m*=0, imposed after RG improvement of the zero-temperature part, cancels the explicit μ dependence generated by the thermal integrals and Bose functions, especially near Tc where the effective mass vanishes (see the derivation of the variational condition and the discussion of thermal logarithms).
  2. [Numerical results for effective potential, Tc, and pressure] Numerical results are presented showing reduced scale dependence, but the manuscript does not quantify the residual μ variation after optimization (e.g., via explicit dV/dμ or relative variation over a stated μ range) nor compare the size of the improvement against the expected higher-order terms in the OPT expansion.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and setup] Define the running scale μ and the variational mass m* more explicitly in the thermal integrals; clarify whether μ is held fixed during the m* optimization or varied simultaneously.
  2. [Figures and tables] Add a brief comparison table or plot that directly overlays the scale dependence of the pure OPT result versus the combined method for at least one thermodynamic quantity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions have been made or where we maintain our original approach based on the numerical evidence presented.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Derivation of the combined effective potential and optimization condition] The central claim requires that RG running of couplings can be inserted into the OPT variational procedure without spoiling the principle of minimal sensitivity. No analytic demonstration is given that the stationarity condition ∂V/∂m*=0, imposed after RG improvement of the zero-temperature part, cancels the explicit μ dependence generated by the thermal integrals and Bose functions, especially near Tc where the effective mass vanishes (see the derivation of the variational condition and the discussion of thermal logarithms).

    Authors: We acknowledge that an explicit analytic demonstration of complete μ cancellation would provide stronger theoretical support. Our construction applies RG improvement to the zero-temperature sector before imposing the OPT stationarity condition ∂V/∂m*=0 on the full thermal potential. This follows the principle of minimal sensitivity, which is intended to minimize residual scale dependence rather than eliminate it exactly in a truncated resummation. The thermal integrals retain some explicit μ dependence through the running couplings and Bose functions, particularly near Tc. Our numerical results across the effective potential, Tc, and pressure nevertheless show substantially reduced variation compared with OPT alone. We have added a clarifying paragraph in the revised manuscript explaining this rationale and the expected limitations of the approximate scheme. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Numerical results for effective potential, Tc, and pressure] Numerical results are presented showing reduced scale dependence, but the manuscript does not quantify the residual μ variation after optimization (e.g., via explicit dV/dμ or relative variation over a stated μ range) nor compare the size of the improvement against the expected higher-order terms in the OPT expansion.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantification strengthens the presentation. In the revised manuscript we now report the maximum relative variation of V, Tc, and the pressure over a concrete interval (μ/Tc ∈ [0.5, 2.0]) both before and after optimization. We also include a brief comparison noting that the observed reduction in scale dependence is of the order expected from the leading OPT resummation relative to the size of omitted higher-order terms in the perturbative expansion. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • An explicit analytic proof that the stationarity condition fully cancels residual μ dependence near Tc.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: combination of RG improvement and OPT remains independently verifiable

full rationale

The paper derives the variational renormalization group effective potential by inserting RG-improved couplings into the OPT variational resummation for the λφ⁴ thermal potential. The optimization condition ∂V/∂m* = 0 is imposed on the combined expression, and scale stability is checked by explicit numerical evaluation of V, Tc, and pressure across μ values. No step reduces by construction to a fitted input or self-citation; the improvement is shown through direct comparison to plain OPT, with the stationarity condition applied after RG running. The derivation is self-contained against the benchmark model and does not rely on unverified uniqueness theorems or renamed empirical patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard thermal field theory assumptions and likely introduces variational parameters whose optimization is central to the method; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • variational parameter(s) in OPT
    Used within optimized perturbation theory to variationally improve the resummation; their specific values are chosen to minimize scale dependence or optimize the potential.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Validity of the effective potential formalism and renormalization group equations at finite temperature in scalar field theory
    Invoked throughout the description of the thermal effective potential and its improvement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5702 in / 1184 out tokens · 46656 ms · 2026-05-18T17:31:32.285926+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale, Finite-temperature field the- ory: Principles and applications, Cambridge University Press, 2011, ISBN 978-0-521-17322-3, 978-0-521-82082-0, 978-0-511-22280-1 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511535130

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511535130 2011

  2. [2]

    J. O. Andersen, E. Braaten and M. Strickland, Screened perturbation theory to three loops, Phys. Rev. D63, 105008 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.105008 [arXiv:hep-ph/0007159 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.105008 2001

  3. [3]

    J. O. Andersen and M. Strickland, Resummation in hot field theories, Annals Phys.317, 281- 353 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.09.017 [arXiv:hep- ph/0404164 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.09.017 2005

  4. [4]

    A brief overview of hard-thermal-loop perturbation theory

    N. Su, A brief overview of hard-thermal-loop pertur- bation theory, Commun. Theor. Phys.57, 409 (2012) doi:10.1088/0253-6102/57/3/12 [arXiv:1204.0260 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0253-6102/57/3/12 2012

  5. [5]

    Curtin, M

    J. L¨ ofgren, Stop comparing resummation methods, J. Phys. G50, no.12, 125008 (2023) doi:10.1088/1361- 6471/ad074b [arXiv:2301.05197 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1361- 2023

  6. [6]

    J. O. Andersen, M. Strickland and N. Su, Gluon Ther- modynamics at Intermediate Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 122003 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.122003 [arXiv:0911.0676 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.122003 2010

  7. [7]

    J. O. Andersen, L. E. Leganger, M. Strickland and N. Su, Three-loop HTL QCD thermodynamics, JHEP08, 053 (2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2011)053 [arXiv:1103.2528 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep08(2011)053 2011

  8. [8]

    Equation of State of hot and dense QCD: Resummed perturbation theory confronts lattice data

    S. Mogliacci, J. O. Andersen, M. Strickland, N. Su and A. Vuorinen, Equation of State of hot and dense QCD: Resummed perturbation theory confronts lattice data, JHEP12, 055 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2013)055 [arXiv:1307.8098 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep12(2013)055 2013

  9. [9]

    Three-loop HTLpt Pressure and Susceptibilities at Finite Temperature and Density

    N. Haque, J. O. Andersen, M. G. Mustafa, M. Strick- land and N. Su, Three-loop pressure and suscepti- bility at finite temperature and density from hard- thermal-loop perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D89, no.6, 061701 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.061701 [arXiv:1309.3968 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.061701 2014

  10. [10]

    Three-loop HTLpt thermodynamics at finite temperature and chemical potential

    A. Bandyopadhyay, N. Haque, M. G. Mustafa, M. Strick- land and N. Su, Three-Loop HTLpt Thermodynamics at Finite Temperature and Chemical Potential, Springer Proc. Phys.174, 17-21 (2016) doi:10.1007/978-3-319- 25619-1 3 [arXiv:1508.04291 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/978-3-319- 2016

  11. [11]

    Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transi- tions

    D. Croon, O. Gould, P. Schicho, T. V. I. Tenkanen and G. White, Theoretical uncertainties for cosmologi- cal first-order phase transitions, JHEP04, 055 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)055 [arXiv:2009.10080 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)055 2021

  12. [12]

    Athron, C

    P. Athron, C. Bal´ azs, A. Fowlie, L. Morris and L. Wu, Cosmological phase transitions: From perturbative parti- cle physics to gravitational waves, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135, 104094 (2024) doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104094 [arXiv:2305.02357 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104094 2024

  13. [13]

    Hashino and D

    K. Hashino and D. Ueda, RGE effects on new physics searches via gravitational waves, [arXiv:2505.13074 [hep- ph]]

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Gould, Real scalar phase transitions: a non- perturbative analysis, JHEP04, 057 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)057 [arXiv:2101.05528 [hep- ph]]

    O. Gould, Real scalar phase transitions: a non- perturbative analysis, JHEP04, 057 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)057 [arXiv:2101.05528 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)057 2021

  15. [15]

    Gould and T

    O. Gould and T. V. I. Tenkanen, On the perturba- tive expansion at high temperature and implications for cosmological phase transitions, JHEP06, 069 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)069 [arXiv:2104.04399 [hep- ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2021)069 2021

  16. [16]

    Funakubo and E

    K. Funakubo and E. Senaha, Refined renormalization group improvement for thermally resummed effective potential, Phys. Rev. D109, no.5, 056023 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.056023 [arXiv:2308.15876 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.056023 2024

  17. [17]

    Okopinska, NONSTANDARD EXPANSION TECHNIQUES FOR THE EFFECTIVE POTEN- TIAL IN LAMBDA PHI**4 QUANTUM FIELD THEORY, Phys

    A. Okopinska, NONSTANDARD EXPANSION TECHNIQUES FOR THE EFFECTIVE POTEN- TIAL IN LAMBDA PHI**4 QUANTUM FIELD THEORY, Phys. Rev. D35, 1835-1847 (1987) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.35.1835

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.35.1835 1987

  18. [18]

    Duncan and M

    A. Duncan and M. Moshe, Nonperturbative Physics from Interpolating Actions, Phys. Lett. B215, 352-358 (1988) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91447-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(88)91447-5 1988

  19. [19]

    V. I. Yukalov, Interplay between Approximation The- ory and Renormalization Group, Phys. Part. Nucl. 50, no.2, 141-209 (2019) doi:10.1134/S1063779619020047 [arXiv:2105.12176 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063779619020047 2019

  20. [20]

    F. F. de Souza Cruz, M. B. Pinto and R. O. Ramos, On the transition temperature for weakly interacting homogeneous Bose gases, Phys. Rev. B64, 014515 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.64.014515 [arXiv:cond- mat/0007151 [cond-mat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.64.014515 2001

  21. [21]

    Critical Dopant Concentration in Polyacetylene and Phase Diagram from a Continuous Four-Fermi Model

    H. Caldas, J. L. Kneur, M. B. Pinto and R. O. Ramos, Critical dopant concentration in polyacetylene and phase diagram from a continuous four-Fermi model, Phys. Rev. B77, 205109 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.205109 [arXiv:0804.2675 [cond-mat.soft]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.205109 2008

  22. [22]

    Magnetization of Planar Four-Fermion Systems

    H. Caldas and R. O. Ramos, Magnetization of planar four-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B80, 115428 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.80.115428 [arXiv:0907.0723 [cond-mat.soft]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.115428 2009

  23. [23]

    Y. M. P. Gomes, E. Martins, M. B. Pinto and R. O. Ramos, First-order phase transitions within Weyl type of materials at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. B108, no.8, 085107 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.108.085107 [arXiv:2305.09007 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.085107 2023

  24. [24]

    J. L. Kneur, M. B. Pinto and R. O. Ramos, Thermody- namics and Phase Structure of the Two-Flavor Nambu– Jona-Lasinio Model Beyond Large-N c, Phys. Rev. C81, 065205 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.065205 [arXiv:1004.3815 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.81.065205 2010

  25. [25]

    J. L. Kneur, M. B. Pinto, R. O. Ramos and E. Staudt, Vector-like contributions from Optimized Perturbation in the Abelian Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model for cold and dense quark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E21, 1250017 (2012) doi:10.1142/S0218301312500176 [arXiv:1201.2860 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218301312500176 2012

  26. [26]

    T. E. Restrepo, J. C. Macias, M. B. Pinto and G. N. Ferrari, Dynamical Generation of a Repulsive Vector Contribution to the Quark Pressure, Phys. Rev. D91, 065017 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.065017 [arXiv:1412.3074 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.065017 2015

  27. [27]

    D. C. Duarte, R. L. S. Farias, P. H. A. Manso and R. O. Ramos, Optimized perturbation theory applied to the study of the thermodynamics and BEC-BCS crossover in the three-color Nambu–Jona- Lasinio model, Phys. Rev. D96, no.5, 056009 (2017) 18 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.056009 [arXiv:1705.10920 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.056009 2017

  28. [28]

    K. G. Klimenko, Nonlinear optimized expansion and the Gross-Neveu model, Z. Phys. C60, 677-682 (1993) doi:10.1007/BF01558396

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01558396 1993

  29. [29]

    M. B. Pinto and R. O. Ramos, High temperature re- summation in the linear delta expansion, Phys. Rev. D60, 105005 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.105005 [arXiv:hep-ph/9903353 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.105005 1999

  30. [30]

    M. B. Pinto and R. O. Ramos, A Nonpertur- bative study of inverse symmetry breaking at high temperatures, Phys. Rev. D61, 125016 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.125016 [arXiv:hep- ph/9912273 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.61.125016 2000

  31. [31]

    J. L. Kneur, M. B. Pinto, R. O. Ramos and E. Staudt, Updating the phase diagram of the Gross- Neveu model in 2+1 dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 657, 136-142 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.10.013 [arXiv:0705.0673 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2007.10.013 2007

  32. [32]

    J. L. Kneur, M. B. Pinto, R. O. Ramos and E. Staudt, Emergence of tricritical point and liquid- gas phase in the massless 2+1 dimensional Gross- Neveu model, Phys. Rev. D76, 045020 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.045020 [arXiv:0705.0676 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.045020 2007

  33. [33]

    R. L. S. Farias, G. Krein and R. O. Ramos, Applicabil- ity of the Linear delta Expansion for the lambda phi**4 Field Theory at Finite Temperature in the Symmetric and Broken Phases, Phys. Rev. D78, 065046 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.065046 [arXiv:0809.1449 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.065046 2008

  34. [34]

    R. L. S. Farias, R. O. Ramos and D. S. Rosa, Symmetry breaking patterns for two coupled com- plex scalar fields at finite temperature and in an external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D104, no.9, 096011 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.096011 [arXiv:2109.03671 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.096011 2021

  35. [35]

    M. C. Silva, R. O. Ramos and R. L. S. Farias, Phase transition patterns for coupled complex scalar fields at finite temperature and density, Phys. Rev. D107, no.3, 036019 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.036019 [arXiv:2301.12621 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.036019 2023

  36. [36]

    Martins, Y

    E. Martins, Y. M. P. Gomes, M. B. Pinto and R. O. Ramos, Testing the equivalence between the planar Gross-Neveu and Thirring models at N=1, Phys. Rev. D110, no.5, 056048 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.056048 [arXiv:2407.03480 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.056048 2024

  37. [37]

    W. R. Tavares, R. O. Ramos, R. L. S. Farias and S. S. Avancini, Charged scalars at finite electric field and temperature in the optimized perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D110, no.11, 116024 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.116024 [arXiv:2409.05967 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.116024 2024

  38. [38]

    J. L. Kneur, M. B. Pinto and R. O. Ramos, Conver- gent resummed linear delta expansion in the critical O(N) (phi**2(i))**2(3-d) model, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 210403 (2002) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.210403 [arXiv:cond- mat/0207089 [cond-mat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.210403 2002

  39. [39]

    D. S. Rosa, R. L. S. Farias and R. O. Ramos, Reliability of the optimized perturbation theory in the 0-dimensional O(N) scalar field model, Physica A464, 11-26 (2016) doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.07.067 [arXiv:1604.00537 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physa.2016.07.067 2016

  40. [40]

    D. C. Duarte, R. L. S. Farias and R. O. Ramos, Optimized perturbation theory for charged scalar fields at finite temperature and in an external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D84, 083525 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.083525 [arXiv:1108.4428 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.083525 2011

  41. [41]

    J. L. Kneur and A. Neveu, Renormalization Group Im- proved Optimized Perturbation Theory: Revisiting the Mass Gap of the O(2N) Gross-Neveu Model, Phys. Rev. D81, 125012 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.125012 [arXiv:1004.4834 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.125012 2010

  42. [42]

    J. L. Kneur and A. Neveu, Lambda(MS-bar) from renor- malization group optimized perturbation, PoSEPS- HEP2011, 307 (2011) doi:10.22323/1.134.0307

    work page doi:10.22323/1.134.0307 2011

  43. [43]

    J. L. Kneur and A. Neveu,α S fromF π and Renormalization Group Optimized Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. D88, no.7, 074025 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.074025 [arXiv:1305.6910 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.074025 2013

  44. [44]

    J. L. Kneur and A. Neveu, Chiral condensate from renormalization group optimized pertur- bation, Phys. Rev. D92, no.7, 074027 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.074027 [arXiv:1506.07506 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.074027 2015

  45. [45]

    J. L. Kneur and M. B. Pinto, Renormalization Group Optimized Perturbation Theory at Finite Temper- atures, Phys. Rev. D92, no.11, 116008 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.116008 [arXiv:1508.02610 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.116008 2015

  46. [46]

    J. L. Kneur and M. B. Pinto, Scale Invari- ant Resummed Perturbation at Finite Tempera- tures, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.3, 031601 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.031601 [arXiv:1507.03508 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.031601 2016

  47. [47]

    Fernandez and J

    L. Fernandez and J. L. Kneur, Renormalization group optimizedλϕ 4 pressure at next-to-next-to- leading order, Phys. Rev. D104, no.9, 096012 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.096012 [arXiv:2107.13328 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.096012 2021

  48. [48]

    T. E. Restrepo, J. L. Kneur, C. Providˆ encia and M. B. Pinto, Comparing strange and non-strange quark stars within resummed QCD at NLO, [arXiv:2501.14935 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  49. [49]

    L. S. Brown, Quantum field theory, Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 1994, ISBN 978-0-521-46946-3

    work page 1994

  50. [50]

    P. M. Stevenson, Optimized Perturbation Theory, Phys. Rev. D23, 2916 (1981) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.2916

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.2916 1981

  51. [51]

    Seznec and J

    R. Seznec and J. Zinn-Justin, Summation of Diver- gent Series by Order Dependent Mappings: Applica- tion to the Anharmonic Oscillator and Critical Expo- nents in Field Theory, J. Math. Phys.20, 1398 (1979) doi:10.1063/1.524247

    work page doi:10.1063/1.524247 1979

  52. [52]

    H. D. Politzer, Stevenson’s Optimized Perturbation Theory Applied to Factorization and Mass Scheme Dependence, Nucl. Phys. B194, 493-512 (1982) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90022-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(82)90022-0 1982

  53. [53]

    Okopinska, Nonstandard Perturbative Methods for the Effective Potential inλϕ 4 QFT, Phys

    A. Okopinska, Nonstandard Perturbative Methods for the Effective Potential inλϕ 4 QFT, Phys. Rev. D36, 2415 (1987) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.36.2415

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.36.2415 1987

  54. [54]

    G. A. Hajj and P. M. Stevenson, Finite Temperature Ef- fects on the Gaussian Effective Potential, Phys. Rev. D 37, 413 (1988) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.413

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.37.413 1988

  55. [55]

    Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Symmetry Behavior at Fi- nite Temperature, Phys. Rev. D9, 3320-3341 (1974) 19 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3320

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.3320 1974

  56. [56]

    Jackiw, Functional evaluation of the effec- tive potential, Phys

    R. Jackiw, Functional evaluation of the effec- tive potential, Phys. Rev. D9, 1686 (1974) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.1686

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.1686 1974

  57. [57]

    Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature

    S. Weinberg, Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature, Phys. Rev. D9, 3357-3378 (1974) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3357

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.3357 1974

  58. [58]

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov and I. L. Shapiro, Ef- fective action in quantum gravity,

    work page

  59. [59]

    Kleinert and V

    H. Kleinert and V. Schulte-Frohlinde, Critical properties of phi**4-theories,

    work page

  60. [61]

    B. M. Kastening, Renormalization group improvement of the effective potential in massive phi**4 theory, Phys. Lett. B283, 287-292 (1992) doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(92)90021-U

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1992

  61. [62]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo, N. Maekawa and H. Nakano, Im- proving the effective potential, Phys. Lett. B301, 83-89 (1993) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90725-W [arXiv:hep- ph/9210228 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90725-w 1993

  62. [63]

    C. Ford, D. R. T. Jones, P. W. Stephenson and M. B. Einhorn, The Effective potential and the renormalization group, Nucl. Phys. B395, 17- 34 (1993) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90206-5 [arXiv:hep- lat/9210033 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90206-5 1993

  63. [64]

    Improving the Effective Potential:Multi-Mass-Scale Case

    M. Bando, T. Kugo, N. Maekawa and H. Nakano, Improving the effective potential: Multimass scale case, Prog. Theor. Phys.90, 405-418 (1993) doi:10.1143/PTP.90.405 [arXiv:hep-ph/9210229 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1143/ptp.90.405 1993

  64. [65]

    Ford, Multiscale renormalization group improvement of the effective potential, Phys

    C. Ford, Multiscale renormalization group improvement of the effective potential, Phys. Rev. D50, 7531- 7537 (1994) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.50.7531 [arXiv:hep- th/9404085 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.7531 1994

  65. [66]

    A Multi-scale Subtraction Scheme and Partial Renormalization Group Equations in the $O(N)$-symmetric $\phi^4$-theory

    C. Ford and C. Wiesendanger, A Multiscale subtrac- tion scheme and partial renormalization group equa- tions in the O(N) symmetric phi**4 theory, Phys. Rev. D55, 2202-2217 (1997) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.2202 [arXiv:hep-ph/9604392 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.55.2202 1997

  66. [67]

    Nakkagawa and H

    H. Nakkagawa and H. Yokota, RG improvement of the effective potential at finite temperature, Mod. Phys. Lett. A11, 2259-2269 (1996) doi:10.1142/S0217732396002253

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732396002253 1996

  67. [68]

    J. M. Chung and B. K. Chung, Renormalization group improvement of the effective potential in mas- sive phi**4 theory, Phys. Rev. D60, 105001 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.105001 [arXiv:hep-th/9905086 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.105001 1999

  68. [69]

    J. M. Chung and B. K. Chung, Renormalization group improvement of the effective potential in massive phi**4 theory: Next-next-next-to-leading logarithm resumma- tion, J. Korean Phys. Soc.39, 971-979 (2001) [arXiv:hep- th/9911196 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2001

  69. [70]

    Zinn-Justin, Quantum field theory and critical phe- nomena, Int

    J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum field theory and critical phe- nomena, Int. Ser. Monogr. Phys.77, 1-914 (1989) Oxford University Press, 2021, ISBN 978-0-19-850923-3, 978-0- 19-883462-5

    work page 1989

  70. [71]

    Scaling and Density of Lee-Yang Zeroes in the Four Dimensional Ising Model

    R. Kenna and C. B. Lang, Scaling and density of Lee- Yang zeros in the four-dimensional Ising model, Phys. Rev. E49, 5012 (1994) doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.49.5012 [arXiv:hep-lat/9311029 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physreve.49.5012 1994

  71. [72]

    J. P. Blaizot, A. Ipp, R. Mendez-Galain and N. Wschebor, Perturbation theory and non-perturbative renormalization flow in scalar field theory at fi- nite temperature, Nucl. Phys. A784, 376-406 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.11.139 [arXiv:hep- ph/0610004 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.11.139 2007

  72. [73]

    J. P. Blaizot, A. Ipp and N. Wschebor, Calculation of the pressure of a hot scalar theory within the Non- Perturbative Renormalization Group, Nucl. Phys. A 849, 165-181 (2011) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.10.007 [arXiv:1007.0991 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.10.007 2011

  73. [74]

    Banerjee and S

    N. Banerjee and S. Mallik, Critical temperature in a Higgs scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D43, 3368-3375 (1991) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3368

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.3368 1991

  74. [75]

    Parisi, Statiscal Field Theory, Addison-Wesley Publ

    G. Parisi, Statiscal Field Theory, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., USA, 1988

    work page 1988

  75. [76]

    Broken phase effective potential in the two-loop Phi-derivable approximation and nature of the phase transition in a scalar theory

    G. Marko, U. Reinosa and Z. Szep, Broken Phase Ef- fective Potential in the Two-Loop Phi-Derivable Ap- proximation and Nature of the Phase Transition in a Scalar Theory, Phys. Rev. D86, 085031 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.085031 [arXiv:1205.5356 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.085031 2012

  76. [77]

    M. L. Bellac, Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2011, ISBN 978-0-511-88506-8, 978-0-521- 65477-7 doi:10.1017/CBO9780511721700

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511721700 2011

  77. [78]

    F. G. Gardim and F. M. Steffens, Thermodynamics of quasi-particles, Nucl. Phys. A797, 50-66 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.09.006 [arXiv:0709.3853 [nucl-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.09.006 2007

  78. [79]

    R. R. Parwani, Resummation in a hot scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D45, 4695 (1992) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D48, 5965 (1993)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.4695 [arXiv:hep- ph/9204216 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.45.4695 1992

  79. [80]

    J. O. Andersen, E. Braaten and M. Strickland, The Massive thermal basketball diagram, Phys. Rev. D62, 045004 (2000) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.62.045004 [arXiv:hep-ph/0002048 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.62.045004 2000

  80. [81]

    Fradkin, Quantum Field Theory: An Integrated Ap- proach, Princeton University Press, 2021, ISBN 978-0- 691-14908-0

    E. Fradkin, Quantum Field Theory: An Integrated Ap- proach, Princeton University Press, 2021, ISBN 978-0- 691-14908-0

    work page 2021