Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 104 references

Combinatorial decision-making driven by multicomponent surface condensates

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Multicomponent surface condensates can be trained as classifiers.

desk verdict Solid, honest paper that makes a real analytical point about linear boundaries and hidden-species expressivity, but the classification claim rests on an unproven uniqueness-of-steady-state assumption that needs referee attention. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.08100 v2 pith:Q6WMJYMQ submitted 2025-09-09 physics.bio-ph

Aidan Zentner , Ethan V. Halingstad , Cameron Chalk , Michael P. Brenner , Arvind Murugan , Erik Winfree , Krishna Shrinivas This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords biomolecularcondensatesmulticomponentliquidssurfacephaseseparationclassificationbycondensationhiddenspeciesdecisionboundariesdifferentiabletrainingofinteractionslatticeMonteCarlovalidation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a multicomponent liquid sitting on a surface can act as a decision-making device, not just a compartment: surface-bound input molecules determine which output molecule gets concentrated into a condensate, and the sharp phase boundary between condensates is the classification border. In the simplest mixtures with only inputs and outputs, that border is constrained to be a straight line in input-composition space. Adding hidden species—molecules that interact with everything but are not the functional output—is enough to curve, fragment, and XOR-like the border, and many hidden species raise capacity until it saturates. The same trained interaction network can then be redirected to new tasks by changing reservoir concentrations alone, even if the interactions were random. If the claims hold, phase separation gives cells a physical substrate for adaptive, high-dimensional information processing.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Flory-Huggins grand potential of a well-mixed surface exchanging output and hidden species with an infinite reservoir, Ω = βνf(φ,χ) − βμ^res·φ_oh, with Model A relaxation dynamics driving the mixture to steady state. The load-bearing identity is the decision-boundary equation obtained by equating the chemical potentials of the two output species; with no hidden species the boundary reduces to Eq. S30, a linear relation in the input concentrations, and with one hidden species to Eq. S33, whose exponential hidden term permits variable curvature. Training is gradient-based: a log-barrier loss penalizes insufficient enrichment of the desired output and insufficient depl

What would settle it

A direct test: build the two-input/two-output mixture with DNA or protein components, clamp the inputs on a surface, and sweep their ratio while measuring output enrichment; success predicts a sharp jump at the straight boundary computed from the trained interaction matrix, and failure of the no-hidden mixture on an AND/XOR-style task confirms the need for hidden species. A second check is to shrink the reservoir from infinite to finite in simulation or experiment: performance should degrade as reservoir volume decreases, and mobile (unclamped) inputs should blur or destroy the boundary, as th

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a two-input/two-output mixture the decision boundary is derived exactly: at equal output recruitment, the difference in reservoir chemical potentials equals a linear combination of input volume fractions, Δμ_res^out = (χ31−χ41)ϕin,1 + (χ32−χ42)ϕin,2. The paper generalizes this to arbitrary input/output counts and shows the boundary is generically a hyperplane away from multiclass junctions. With one hidden species the boundary becomes nonlinear because the hidden concentration follows a Boltzmann-like relation and feeds back into the deciding equation (Eq. S33); training with several hidden species yields XOR, circle, sine, and checkerboard partitions. Mechanistically, the learned system

Load-bearing premise

The learned design works only if an infinite reservoir can hold output and hidden species at the trained chemical potentials while the surface stays well-mixed with inputs clamped in place; if real reservoirs are finite or inputs can diffuse, the classification is not guaranteed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cells could implement surface classification, such as gene-activating versus silencing condensates, with only pairwise liquid interactions and no dedicated molecular logic circuit.
  • Any observed nonlinear decision boundary in a two-output condensate system implies hidden regulatory species or higher-order interactions beyond the minimal pairwise model.
  • Reprogramming by reservoir tuning means expression-level changes in ambient cofactor concentrations can retrain a fixed molecular interaction network to a new task.
  • Because mean-field trained parameters work in 3D lattice simulations, designed DNA or protein condensates could be built from computed interaction and reservoir-potential matrices.
  • Classification success saturates as hidden species increase, indicating a finite information and capacity limit for this class of liquid computers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the linear-boundary derivation generalizes biologically, then sharply curved or XOR-like behaviors at real cellular surfaces are evidence for hidden regulators playing an active computational role, not just passive scaffolding.
  • The encrypted-phase picture implies that imaging only the functional output, or only the hidden cofactor, can misread a condensate's state; simultaneous imaging of both axes should reveal latent states that predict task identity.
  • Reservoir-only retraining with fixed random interactions suggests a minimal experimental test of adaptation: assemble one DNA or protein condensate repertoire, then change solution composition to switch it between AND, OR, and XOR-style input-output behaviors without altering the components' binding affinities.
  • Closing the reservoir loop—letting condensate formation regulate reservoir species, for example through a genetic feedback circuit—would convert these trained classifiers into autonomously learning systems; this is outside the paper's model but a direct consequence of its reservoir assumption.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper develops a mean-field thermodynamic model of surface-localized multicomponent condensates (Eqs. 5-8). Input species are clamped on the surface; output and hidden species exchange with an infinite reservoir at fixed chemical potentials. The authors train the interaction matrix χ and reservoir potentials μ_res by gradient descent to make the steady-state surface composition satisfy one-hot enrichment/depletion thresholds, and report that (i) input-output mixtures generically yield linear decision boundaries (SI Note 3, Eq. S30); (ii) hidden species enable nonlinear boundaries (AND, XOR, circle, sine, checkerboard) with success saturating as the number of hidden species increases; (iii) the resulting capacity is associated with multiple 'encrypted' phases differing in hidden-species composition; (iv) fixed interaction networks can be reprogrammed by retuning reservoir potentials; and (v) mean-field-trained parameters transfer to a 3D lattice Monte Carlo model. The paper contains an analytical derivation of linearity, extensive simulations, held-out test evaluation, and an explicit discussion of modeling limitations.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a useful step toward a physics-based theory of information processing by condensation. The authors should be credited for a transparent model, a clean analytical result for the linear case that is checked against simulation, held-out evaluation of trained classifiers, public code, and a 3D lattice transfer test that provides a concrete, falsifiable bridge to experiments. The main caveat is that classification is defined through a deterministic ODE that can have multiple steady states; until the authors specify an initialization protocol or prove uniqueness, the 'surface classification by condensation' claim is not fully well-defined. The universal-approximation passage is also explicitly unfinished in the SI. These issues are fixable and do not, in my assessment, invalidate the empirical findings.

major comments (1)
  1. [Discussion / SI Note 3, 'A potential route...'] The Discussion states that the model is 'in principle ... flexible enough to universally approximate arbitrary decision boundaries' and cites SI Note 3. The SI passage is explicitly a 'rough sketch for a universal approximation theorem'; it lists four assumptions that 'still require rigorous testing,' including behavior near vertices of partitions, WTA stability, preservation of boundaries when adding hidden-output links, and the bounded-χ constraint. Since the paper's expressivity narrative leans on this universality, the main text should either present a theorem with the assumptions stated, or explicitly label the claim as a conjecture. As written, a reader cannot distinguish an established proposition from an untested construction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title] The arXiv title ('Combinatorial decision-making driven by multicomponent surface condensates') and the full-text title ('Information processing driven by multicomponent surface condensates') are inconsistent. Please align them.
  2. [Results: Hidden species expand capacity / SI Note 5] The phase-count estimate in Fig. 4A uses a Marchenko-Pastur threshold that SI Note 5 states may underestimate the phase count; Fig. S12 acknowledges a discrepancy for the checkerboard. The main-text interpretation ('the primary mechanism by which hidden species improve expressivity') should carry this caveat, or the method should be validated on synthetic examples with known phase counts.
  3. [3D lattice transfer / Fig. S14A] The lattice-model success rates in Fig. S14A use the maximally lenient thresholds A_test = B_test = (A+B)/2. The main text cautiously says 'broadly encode similar classification boundaries,' but it would be helpful to state the success rates with the original thresholds and to explain how the presence of coexisting pockets near the decision boundary affects the definition of S_c in the lattice model.
  4. [Model Framework / Eq. 8] The mobility matrix D is described as 'diagonal, identical for solutes,' but SI Note 1's derivation gives a mobility matrix with entries d_i φ_i (Eq. S13/S18). Clarify whether D is intended to be a constant matrix or a composition-dependent one, and whether the steady state is independent of this choice.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: core derivations are self-contained and tested on held-out data; minor overlapping citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

We walked the derivation chain from the model free energy (Eqs. 5-6) through the steady-state dynamics (Eq. 8), the decision-boundary analysis (SI Note 3, Eqs. S26-S33), the training loss (Eqs. 9-13), and the lattice Monte Carlo validation (SI Note 4). The linear-boundary result follows algebraically from the steady-state chemical-potential equalities, and the nonlinear-boundary expression with a hidden species is derived from the same equations rather than fitted to the target outputs. Training and test sets are separate, so classification success is not a re-reporting of the training loss. The universal-approximation passage in SI Note 3 is explicitly labeled a 'rough sketch' and its unverified assumptions are stated, so it is not presented as a closed proof. The lattice simulation is an independent spatial model using parameters transferred from mean-field training, providing external consistency. The manuscript itself flags the reservoir-maintenance assumption (SI Note 7: 'A central assumption of the model is that the trained reservoir potential will be maintained by the cellular milieu') and the possibility of multiple local minima (SI Note 3), but these are limitations and correctness risks, not circularity. The only notable issue is that several background references overlap with the author list (e.g., refs 35, 36, 41); however, those citations are used for standard modeling choices (Fickian mobility, lattice-liquid methodology) and for comparison of MNIST results, and the paper's central claim does not reduce to any of them. Accordingly, the paper receives a low circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a standard mean-field thermodynamic model plus a set of idealizations: an infinite reservoir with arbitrary chemical potentials, clamped and well-mixed inputs, and pairwise interactions. The fitted thresholds A and B, the interaction bound, the per-task hidden species counts, and the lattice temperature are hand-set or empirically chosen and directly affect the reported success rates. The Marchenko-Pastur phase-counting procedure is an auxiliary analysis tool with known limitations.

free parameters (7)
  • A (target enrichment threshold) = 1.1
    Hand-set threshold defining the desired output enrichment in the loss function and in the success metric S_c.
  • B (target depletion threshold) = 0.25
    Hand-set threshold defining allowed depletion of undesired outputs in the loss function and success metric.
  • Maximum interaction strength χmax = 15
    Constraint |χij|<15 to keep energy scales of order kBT; limits the expressivity of trained networks and is used throughout.
  • Output-output repulsion floor = χ>10 for distinct outputs
    Design constraint forcing one-hot output condensates; part of the training conditions.
  • Hidden species count per task = 2, 6, 10, 12, 20 for AND, XOR, circle, sine, checkerboard
    Chosen per benchmark to achieve the target boundary; the capacity scaling and saturation results depend on these counts.
  • Lattice inverse temperature β = 2
    Chosen empirically to sharpen decision boundaries in the 3D lattice transfer; directly affects reported lattice success rates.
  • Dataset-to-concentration scaling φ0 = 0.125 for Iris, 0.5/49 for MNIST
    Maps raw feature values to volume fractions; influences the feasibility and accuracy of the classification benchmarks.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Flory-Huggins mean-field free energy with equal molecular sizes and pairwise interactions
    Eq. 6 assumes equal molecular volumes, pairwise χ interactions, and negligible solute-solvent interactions; the central model is built on this.
  • domain assumption Model A relaxation dynamics to steady state
    Eq. 8 assumes near-equilibrium dynamics driven by chemical potential gradients, with solvent much faster than solutes (SI Note 1).
  • domain assumption Infinite reservoir maintains constant chemical potentials
    Eq. 4 posits an infinite reservoir holding μres fixed for output and hidden species; SI Note 7 acknowledges this as a central, physically non-trivial assumption.
  • domain assumption Input species are clamped, immobile, and well-mixed on the surface
    Inputs are fixed in count and position; SI Note 7 states that if inputs can move within the surface, classifier performance is lost.
  • ad hoc to paper Marchenko-Pastur threshold for phase counting
    The number of distinct phases is inferred from PCA eigenvalues above the Marchenko-Pastur upper bound; the SI acknowledges this can underestimate the true phase count.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Combinatorial decision-making driven by multicomponent surface condensates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q6WMJYMQ

@misc{pith2026250908100,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Combinatorial decision-making driven by multicomponent surface condensates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q6WMJYMQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08100}
}
read the original abstract

Living organisms rely on molecular networks, such as gene circuits and signaling pathways, for information processing and robust decision-making in crowded, noisy environments. Recent advances show that interacting biomolecules self-organize by phase transitions into coexisting spatial compartments called condensates, often on cellular surfaces such as chromatin and membranes. In this paper, we demonstrate that multicomponent fluids can be designed to recruit distinct condensates to surfaces with differing compositions, performing a form of surface classification by condensation. We draw an analogy to multidimensional classification in machine learning and explore how hidden species, analogous to hidden nodes, expand the expressivity and capacity of these interacting ensembles to facilitate complex decision boundaries. By simply changing levels of individual species, we find that the same molecular repertoire can be reprogrammed to solve new tasks. Together, our findings suggest that the physical processes underlying biomolecular condensates can encode and drive adaptive information processing beyond compartmentalization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08100 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (A) The model is motivated by multiple cellular condensates that form on surfaces such as DNA and bilayers. Species that are localized primarily to the surface, such as transcription factors (DNA) and membrane proteins (bilayer), are modeled as input species (black and gray). Other species, such as coactivators (DNA) or kinases (bilayer), freely exchange between the surface and the cellular environment, or reservoir… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (A) The target linear decision boundary is shown, with each axis being the concentration of one of the input species. Green and pink denote regions where we desire condensates enriched in the green and pink component, respectively. (B) Predictions from the trained model for different input compositions in the test set. The axes depict the input concentrations while each dot is a test input condition, colored by the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (A) Hidden species, depicted in cyan in the interaction matrix and analogous to hidden nodes in Boltzmann machines, shape emergent overall phase behavior by interacting with input and output species but cannot directly drive output function. (B) Using only 2 hidden species (gold and cyan), we train for parameters to form an AND-like upper quadrant decision boundary in the mean-field limit. (C) Predictions from the t… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (A) The scaling of the test set classification success Sc (left) and the number of phases averaged across multiple training trajectories (right) as a function the number of hidden species in the model. (B) When defined in terms of output species composition alone, the …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (A) Given the previously-trained interaction network with Nh = 6 and reservoir potential vector that solve a XOR decision boundary (left), the same interaction network can also solve an AND decision boundary (middle) and OR decision boundary (right) by selectively tuni…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (A) Solving classification of the MNIST dataset involves embedding pixel grayscale values into many input species concentrations, then training interaction parameters and reservoir concentrations for the formation of condensates enriched in 1 of 10 output species. (B) …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (A) Schematic of 3D lattice liquid. Inputs are clamped to lattice positions, and output and hidden species can exchange freely. On the right is the evolution of a lattice from initial to final configurations. (B) Analog 3D lattice liquid classification using mapped mea…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    CRC Press, July 2019

    Uri Alon.An Introduction to Systems Biology: Design Principles of Biological Circuits. CRC Press, July 2019. ISBN 978-1-000-00132-7. Google-Books-ID: Lg3MDwAAQBAJ

    2019

  2. [2]

    Hartwell, John J

    Leland H. Hartwell, John J. Hopfield, Stanislas Leibler, and Andrew W. Mur- ray. From molecular to modular cell biology.Nature, 402(6761):C47–C52, December 1999. ISSN 1476-4687. doi:10.1038/35011540. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    doi:10.1038/35011540 1999

  3. [3]

    Lim, Connie M

    Wendell A. Lim, Connie M. Lee, and Chao Tang. Design Principles of Regula- tory Networks: Searching for the Molecular Algorithms of the Cell.Molecular Cell, 49(2):202–212, January 2013. ISSN 1097-2765. doi:10.1016/j.molcel. 2012.12.020. Publisher: Elsevier

    work page doi:10.1016/j.molcel 2013

  4. [4]

    Jacob Parres-Gold, Matthew Levine, Benjamin Emert, Andrew Stuart, and Michael B. Elowitz. Contextual computation by competitive protein dimeriza- tion networks.Cell, 188(7):1984–2002.e17, April 2025. ISSN 1097-4172. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.01.036

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.01.036 1984

  5. [5]

    M. Conrad. Self-assembly as a mechanism of molecular computing. InIm- ages of the Twenty-First Century. Proceedings of the Annual International En- gineering in Medicine and Biology Society,, pages 1354–1355 vol.4, Novem- ber 1989. doi:10.1109/IEMBS.1989.96236

    work page arXiv 1989

  6. [6]

    Levine, and Itamar Willner

    Johann Elbaz, Oleg Lioubashevski, Fuan Wang, Françoise Remacle, Raphael D. Levine, and Itamar Willner. DNA computing circuits using libraries of DNAzyme subunits.Nature Nanotechnology, 5(6):417–422, June 2010. ISSN 1748-3395. doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.88. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.88 2010

  7. [7]

    Brenner, and Stanislas Leibler

    Arvind Murugan, Zorana Zeravcic, Michael P . Brenner, and Stanislas Leibler. Multifarious assembly mixtures: Systems allowing retrieval of diverse stored structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(1):54–59, January 2015. ISSN 0027-8424, 1091-6490. doi:10.1073/pnas.1413941112

    doi:10.1073/pnas.1413941112 2015

  8. [8]

    Schwab, and Arvind Murugan

    Weishun Zhong, David J. Schwab, and Arvind Murugan. Associative Pat- tern Recognition Through Macro-molecular Self-Assembly.Journal of Statis- tical Physics, 167(3):806–826, May 2017. ISSN 1572-9613. doi:10.1007/ s10955-017-1774-2

    2017

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    Diverse and robust molecular algorithms using re- programmable DNA self-assembly.Nature, 567(7748):366–372, March 2019

    Damien Woods, David Doty, Cameron Myhrvold, Joy Hui, Felix Zhou, Peng Yin, and Erik Winfree. Diverse and robust molecular algorithms using re- programmable DNA self-assembly.Nature, 567(7748):366–372, March 2019. ISSN 1476-4687. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1014-9. Publisher: Nature...

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    Pattern recognition in the nucleation kinetics of non-equilibrium self-assembly

    Constantine Glen Evans, Jackson O’Brien, Erik Winfree, and Arvind Murugan. Pattern recognition in the nucleation kinetics of non-equilibrium self-assembly. Nature, 625(7995):500–507, January 2024. ISSN 1476-4687. doi:10.1038/ s41586-023-06890-z. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2024

  3. [11]

    Jeff Hasty, David McMillen, and J. J. Collins. Engineered gene circuits.Na- ture, 420(6912):224–230, November 2002. ISSN 1476-4687. doi:10.1038/ nature01257. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2002

  4. [12]

    Timothy Frei, Ching-Hsiang Chang, Maurice Filo, Asterios Arampatzis, and Mustafa Khammash. A genetic mammalian proportional–integral feedback control circuit for robust and precise gene regulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(24):e2122132119, June 2022....

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Klosin, F

    A. Klosin, F . Oltsch, T. Harmon, A. Honigmann, F . Jülicher, A. A. Hyman, and C. Zechner. Phase separation provides a mechanism to reduce noise in cells. Science, 367(6476):464–468, January 2020. doi:10.1126/science.aav6691. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement...

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    Banani, Hyun O

    Salman F . Banani, Hyun O. Lee, Anthony A. Hyman, and Michael K. Rosen. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry.Nature Re- views. Molecular Cell Biology, 18(5):285–298, May 2017. ISSN 1471-0080. doi:10.1038/nrm.2017.7. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    Brangwynne

    Y ongdae Shin and Clifford P . Brangwynne. Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease.Science, 357(6357):eaaf4382, September 2017. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf4382. Publisher: American Association for the Advance- ment of Science

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    Lyon, William B

    Andrew S. Lyon, William B. Peeples, and Michael K. Rosen. A framework for understanding the functions of biomolecular condensates across scales. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, pages 1–21, November 2020. ISSN 1471-0080. doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00303-z. Publisher: Nature ...

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    Holehouse, and Rohit V

    Jeong-Mo Choi, Alex S. Holehouse, and Rohit V. Pappu. Physical Principles Underlying the Complex Biology of Intracellular Phase Transitions.Annual Review of Biophysics, 49(Volume 49, 2020):107–133, May 2020. ISSN 1936- 122X, 1936-1238. doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-121219-081629...

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Frank Jülicher and Christoph A. Weber. Droplet Physics and Intracellu- lar Phase Separation.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 15 (Volume 15, 2024):237–261, March 2024. ISSN 1947-5454, 1947-5462. doi: 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031720-032917. Publisher: Annual Reviews

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    Y oung, Arup K

    Denes Hnisz, Krishna Shrinivas, Richard A. Y oung, Arup K. Chakraborty, and Phillip A. Sharp. A Phase Separation Model for Transcriptional Control.Cell, 169(1):13–23, March 2017. ISSN 0092-8674. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.007

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    Sabari, Eliot L

    Krishna Shrinivas, Benjamin R. Sabari, Eliot L. Coffey, Isaac A. Klein, Ann Boija, Alicia V. Zamudio, Jurian Schuijers, Nancy M. Hannett, Phillip A. Sharp, Richard A. Y oung, and Arup K. Chakraborty. Enhancer Features that Drive Formation of Transcriptional Condensates.Molecul...

    2019 doi

  13. [21]

    Kemp, Marco Tarzia, Victoria E

    Woonyung Hur, James P . Kemp, Marco Tarzia, Victoria E. Deneke, William F . Marzluff, Robert J. Duronio, and Stefano Di Talia. CDK-Regulated Phase Sep- aration Seeded by Histone Genes Ensures Precise Growth and Function of Histone Locus Bodies.Developmental Cell, 54(3):379–394...

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    Morin, Sina Wittmann, Sandeep Choubey, Adam Klosin, Stefan Golfier, Anthony A

    Jose A. Morin, Sina Wittmann, Sandeep Choubey, Adam Klosin, Stefan Golfier, Anthony A. Hyman, Frank Jülicher, and Stephan W. Grill. Sequence- dependent surface condensation of a pioneer transcription factor on DNA.Na- ture Physics, 18(3):271–276, March 2022. ISSN 1745-2481. do...

    2022

  15. [23]

    RNA polymerase II clusters form in line with surface condensation on regulatory chromatin.Molecular Systems Biology, 17(9):e10272, 2021

    Agnieszka Pancholi, Tim Klingberg, Weichun Zhang, Roshan Prizak, Irina Ma- montova, Amra Noa, Marcel Sobucki, Andrei Yu Kobitski, Gerd Ulrich Nien- haus, Vasily Zaburdaev, and Lennart Hilbert. RNA polymerase II clusters form in line with surface condensation on regulatory chro...

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    Bond and Archa H

    Charles S. Bond and Archa H. Fox. Paraspeckles: nuclear bodies built on long noncoding RNA.The Journal of Cell Biology, 186(5):637–644, September

  17. [25]

    Snead, Mary K

    Wilton T. Snead, Mary K. Skillicorn, Krishna Shrinivas, and Amy S. Gladfelter. Immiscible proteins compete for RNA binding to order condensate layers.Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(32):e2504778122, Au- gust 2025. doi:10.1073/pnas.2504778122. Publisher: ...

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    Case, Jonathon A

    Lindsay B. Case, Jonathon A. Ditlev, and Michael K. Rosen. Regulation of Transmembrane Signaling by Phase Separation.Annual Review of Bio- physics, 48(1):465–494, 2019. doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115534. _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115534

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    Zhao and Hong Zhang

    Y an G. Zhao and Hong Zhang. Phase Separation in Membrane Biology: The Interplay between Membrane-Bound Organelles and Membraneless Con- densates.Developmental Cell, 55(1):30–44, 2020. ISSN 18781551. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.06.033. Publisher: Elsevier Inc

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    Wilton T. Snead. Condensate-membrane interactions shape membranes, tune cytoskeletal assembly, and localize mRNAs.Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 95:102540, August 2025. ISSN 0955-0674. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2025.102540

    2025

  21. [29]

    Sear and José A

    Richard P . Sear and José A. Cuesta. Instabilities in Complex Mixtures with a Large Number of Components.Physical Review Letters, 91(24):245701, December 2003. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.245701. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2003 doi

  22. [30]

    Predicting phase equilibria in polydisperse systems.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14(3):R79, December 2001

    Peter Sollich. Predicting phase equilibria in polydisperse systems.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 14(3):R79, December 2001. ISSN 0953-8984. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/14/3/201

    2001 doi

  23. [31]

    Jacobs and Daan Frenkel

    William M. Jacobs and Daan Frenkel. Predicting phase behavior in multicom- ponent mixtures.Journal of Chemical Physics, 139(2):024108, July 2013. ISSN 00219606. doi:10.1063/1.4812461. Publisher: American Institute of PhysicsAIP

    2013 doi

  24. [32]

    William M. Jacobs. Self-Assembly of Biomolecular Condensates with Shared Components.Physical Review Letters, 126(25):258101, June 2021. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.126.258101. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2021

  25. [33]

    Fan Chen and William M. Jacobs. Programmable phase behavior in fluids with designable interactions.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 158(21):214118, June 2023. ISSN 0021-9606. doi:10.1063/5.0147211

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    Evolved interactions stabilize many coexist- ing phases in multicomponent liquids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(28):e2201250119, July 2022

    David Zwicker and Liedewij Laan. Evolved interactions stabilize many coexist- ing phases in multicomponent liquids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(28):e2201250119, July 2022. doi:10.1073/pnas.2201250119. Publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    Krishna Shrinivas and Michael P . Brenner. Multiphase coexistence capacity in complex fluids, October 2022. Pages: 2022.10.19.512909 Section: New Results

    2022

  28. [36]

    Krishna Shrinivas and Michael P . Brenner. Phase separation in fluids with many interacting components.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(45), November 2021. ISSN 0027-8424, 1091-6490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108551118. Publisher: National Academy of Sciences Sect...

    2021 doi

  29. [37]

    Scaling of phase Zentneret al

    Yicheng Qiang, Chengjie Luo, and David Zwicker. Scaling of phase Zentneret al. 13 count in multicomponent liquids, May 2024. arXiv:2405.01138 [cond-mat, physics:physics]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Veatch, and Benjamin B

    Mason Rouches, Sarah L. Veatch, and Benjamin B. Machta. Surface densities prewet a near-critical membrane.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(40), October 2021. ISSN 0027-8424, 1091-6490. doi:10.1073/ pnas.2103401118. Publisher: National Academy of Sciences Se...

    2021

  31. [39]

    Haataja, and Andrej Košmrlj

    Sheng Mao, Derek Kuldinow, Mikko P . Haataja, and Andrej Košmrlj. Phase behavior and morphology of multicomponent liquid mixtures.Soft Matter, 15 (6):1297–1311, 2019. doi:10.1039/C8SM02045K. Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Liquid Hopfield model: Retrieval and localization in multicomponent liquid mixtures

    Rodrigo Braz Teixeira, Giorgio Carugno, Izaak Neri, and Pablo Sartori. Liquid Hopfield model: Retrieval and localization in multicomponent liquid mixtures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(48):e2320504121, November 2024. doi:10.1073/pnas.2320504121. Publish...

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    Learning and Inference in a Lattice Model of Multicomponent Con- densates

    Cameron Chalk, Salvador Buse, Krishna Shrinivas, Arvind Murugan, and Erik Winfree. Learning and Inference in a Lattice Model of Multicomponent Con- densates. InDROPS-IDN/v2/document/10.4230/LIPIcs.DNA.30.5. Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2024. doi:10.4230/L...

    2024 doi

  34. [42]

    Nucleic acid liquids.Reports on Progress in Physics, 87(6):066601, May 2024

    Gabrielle R Abraham, Aria S Chaderjian, Anna B N Nguyen, Sam Wilken, and Omar A Saleh. Nucleic acid liquids.Reports on Progress in Physics, 87(6):066601, May 2024. ISSN 0034-4885. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad4662. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    Engineering DNA-based synthetic condensates with programmable mate- rial properties, compositions, and functionalities.Science Advances, 8(41): eabj1771, October 2022

    Sungho Do, Chanseok Lee, Taehyun Lee, Do-Nyun Kim, and Y ongdae Shin. Engineering DNA-based synthetic condensates with programmable mate- rial properties, compositions, and functionalities.Science Advances, 8(41): eabj1771, October 2022. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj1771. Publisher: ...

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    Tang, Melissa Ann Klocke, Martin Vin- cent Gobry, Giacomo Fabrini, Lorenzo Di Michele, Paul W

    Jaimie Marie Stewart, Shiyi Li, Anli A. Tang, Melissa Ann Klocke, Martin Vin- cent Gobry, Giacomo Fabrini, Lorenzo Di Michele, Paul W. K. Rothemund, and Elisa Franco. Modular RNA motifs for orthogonal phase separated compart- ments.Nature Communications, 15(1):6244, July 2024....

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    Tang, Reece McCoy, Róisín M

    Giacomo Fabrini, Nada Farag, Sabrina Pia Nuccio, Shiyi Li, Jaimie Marie Stewart, Anli A. Tang, Reece McCoy, Róisín M. Owens, Paul W. K. Rothe- mund, Elisa Franco, Marco Di Antonio, and Lorenzo Di Michele. Co- transcriptional production of programmable RNA condensates and synth...

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Com- putational DNA Droplets Recognizing miRNA Sequence Inputs Based on Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation.Advanced Functional Materials, 32(37): 2202322, 2022

    Jing Gong, Nozomi Tsumura, Yusuke Sato, and Masahiro Takinoue. Com- putational DNA Droplets Recognizing miRNA Sequence Inputs Based on Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation.Advanced Functional Materials, 32(37): 2202322, 2022. ISSN 1616-3028. doi:10.1002/adfm.202202322. _eprint: http...

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    DNA droplets for intelligent and dynamical artificial cells: from the viewpoint of computation and non-equilibrium systems.Interface Focus, 13(5):20230021, August 2023

    Masahiro Takinoue. DNA droplets for intelligent and dynamical artificial cells: from the viewpoint of computation and non-equilibrium systems.Interface Focus, 13(5):20230021, August 2023. doi:10.1098/rsfs.2023.0021. Publisher: Royal Society

    2023

  40. [48]

    DNA Droplets: Intelligent, Dynamic Fluid.Advanced Biology, 7(3):2200180,

    Hirotake Udono, Jing Gong, Yusuke Sato, and Masahiro Takinoue. DNA Droplets: Intelligent, Dynamic Fluid.Advanced Biology, 7(3):2200180,

  41. [49]

    Dufresne

    Arvind Murugan, David Zwicker, Charlotta Lorenz, and Eric R. Dufresne. Could Living Cells Use Phase Transitions to Process Information?arXiv, July 2025. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2507.23384. arXiv:2507.23384 [physics]

    2025 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    P . C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin. Theory of dynamic critical phenom- ena.Reviews of Modern Physics, 49(3):435–479, July 1977. doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.49.435. Publisher: American Physical Society

    1977

  43. [51]

    JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs

    James Bradbury, Roy Frostig, Peter Hawkins, Matthew James Johnson, Chris Leary, Dougal Maclaurin, George Necula, Adam Paszke, Jake VanderPlas, Skye Wanderman-Milne, and Qiao Zhang. JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs. 2018. URL: http://github.com/google/jax

    2018

  44. [52]

    The DeepMind JAX Ecosystem

    DeepMind, Igor Babuschkin, Kate Baumli, Alison Bell, Surya Bhupatiraju, Jake Bruce, Peter Buchlovsky, David Budden, Trevor Cai, Aidan Clark, Ivo Danihelka, Antoine Dedieu, Claudio Fantacci, Jonathan Godwin, Chris Jones, Ross Hemsley, Tom Hennigan, Matteo Hessel, Shaobo Hou, St...

    2020

  45. [53]

    Ackley, Geoffrey E

    David H. Ackley, Geoffrey E. Hinton, and Terrence J. Sejnowski. A learning algorithm for boltzmann machines.Cognitive Science, 9(1):147–169, January

  46. [54]

    V. A. Mar ˇcenko and L. A. Pastur. Distribution of eigenvalues for some sets of random matrices.Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik, 1(4):457, April 1967. ISSN 0025-5734. doi:10.1070/SM1967v001n04ABEH001994. Publisher: IOP Publishing

    1967 doi

  47. [55]

    Random Features for Large-Scale Kernel Machines

    Ali Rahimi and Benjamin Recht. Random Features for Large-Scale Kernel Machines. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 20, pages 1177–1184. Curran Associates, Inc., 2007

    2007

  48. [56]

    Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: A review.Neural Networks, 115:100–123, July 2019

    Gouhei Tanaka, Toshiyuki Y amane, Jean Benoit Héroux, Ryosho Nakane, Naoki Kanazawa, Seiji Takeda, Hidetoshi Numata, Daiju Nakano, and Akira Hirose. Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: A review.Neural Networks, 115:100–123, July 2019. ISSN 0893-6080. doi:10.1016/j...

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    Su, Arvind Murugan, James M

    Christina J. Su, Arvind Murugan, James M. Linton, Akshay Y eluri, Justin Bois, Heidi Klumpe, Matthew A. Langley, Y aron E. Antebi, and Michael B. Elowitz. Ligand-receptor promiscuity enables cellular addressing.Cell Systems, 13 (5):408–425.e12, May 2022. ISSN 2405-4712, 2405-4...

    2022 doi

  50. [58]

    Learning Without Neurons in Phys- ical Systems.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 14(Volume 14, 2023):417–441, March 2023

    Menachem Stern and Arvind Murugan. Learning Without Neurons in Phys- ical Systems.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 14(Volume 14, 2023):417–441, March 2023. ISSN 1947-5454, 1947-5462. doi:10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-040821-113439. Publisher: Annual Reviews

    2023

  51. [59]

    Rocks, and Andrea J

    Menachem Stern, Daniel Hexner, Jason W. Rocks, and Andrea J. Liu. Super- vised Learning in Physical Networks: From Machine Learning to Learning Ma- chines.Physical Review X, 11(2):021045, May 2021. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX. 11.021045. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2021 doi

  52. [60]

    Palmer, and Arvind Murugan

    Menachem Stern, Chukwunonso Arinze, Leron Perez, Stephanie E. Palmer, and Arvind Murugan. Supervised learning through physical changes in a me- chanical system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(26): 14843–14850, June 2020. doi:10.1073/pnas.2000807117. Publis...

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    Cherry and Lulu Qian

    Kevin M. Cherry and Lulu Qian. Scaling up molecular pattern recognition with DNA-based winner-take-all neural networks.Nature, 559(7714):370–376, July

  54. [62]

    Phase transitions in biological systems with many components.Biophysical Journal, 112(4):683–691, 2017

    William M Jacobs and Daan Frenkel. Phase transitions in biological systems with many components.Biophysical Journal, 112(4):683–691, 2017

    2017

  55. [63]

    Vazirani.Approximation Algorithms

    Vijay V. Vazirani.Approximation Algorithms. Springer Science & Business Media, March 2013. ISBN 978-3-662-04565-7. Google-Books-ID: bJmq- CAAAQBAJ

    2013

  56. [64]

    Gaofeng Pei, Heankel Lyons, Pilong Li, and Benjamin R. Sabari. Tran- scription regulation by biomolecular condensates.Nature Reviews Molec- ular Cell Biology, 26(3):213–236, March 2025. ISSN 1471-0080. doi: 10.1038/s41580-024-00789-x. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2025 doi

  57. [65]

    Antebi, James M

    Y aron E. Antebi, James M. Linton, Heidi Klumpe, Bogdan Bintu, Mengsha Gong, Christina Su, Reed McCardell, and Michael B. Elowitz. Combinatorial Signal Perception in the BMP Pathway.Cell, 170(6):1184–1196.e24, Septem- ber 2017. ISSN 10974172. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.08.015. Pu...

    2017 doi

  58. [66]

    Klumpe, Matthew A

    Heidi E. Klumpe, Matthew A. Langley, James M. Linton, Christina J. Su, Y aron E. Antebi, and Michael B. Elowitz. The context-dependent, combina- torial logic of BMP signaling.Cell Systems, 13(5):388–407.e10, May 2022. ISSN 2405-4712. doi:10.1016/j.cels.2022.03.002

    2022 doi

  59. [67]

    Cotten, Jonggul Kim, Michael K

    Kamal Bhandari, Michael A. Cotten, Jonggul Kim, Michael K. Rosen, and Jeremy D. Schmit. Structure–Function Properties in Disordered Condensates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 125(1):467–476, January 2021. ISSN 1520-6106. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c11057. Publisher: American...

    2021 doi

  60. [68]

    A phase-field model for solutions of DNA-made particles.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 162(19):194901, May 2025

    Marco Cappa, Francesco Sciortino, and Lorenzo Rovigatti. A phase-field model for solutions of DNA-made particles.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 162(19):194901, May 2025. ISSN 0021-9606. doi:10.1063/5.0257265

    2025 doi

  61. [69]

    Walls, Athanassios Z

    Ushnish Rana, Ke Xu, Amal Narayanan, Mackenzie T. Walls, Athanassios Z. Panagiotopoulos, José L. Avalos, and Clifford P . Brangwynne. Asymmetric oligomerization state and sequence patterning can tune multiphase conden- sate miscibility.Nature Chemistry, 16(7):1073–1082, July 2...

    2024

  62. [70]

    Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79 (8):2554–2558, April 1982

    J J Hopfield. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79 (8):2554–2558, April 1982. doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554. Publisher: Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences

    1982 doi

  63. [71]

    On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural Networks.arXiv, June

    Maithra Raghu, Ben Poole, Jon Kleinberg, Surya Ganguli, and Jascha Sohl- Dickstein. On the Expressive Power of Deep Neural Networks.arXiv, June

  64. [72]

    Foley and Margaret E

    Samuel L. Foley and Margaret E. Johnson. Membrane-associated self- assembly for cellular decision making.arXiv, 2025

    2025

  65. [73]

    Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton

    Daniel A Fletcher and R Dyche Mullins. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature, 463(7280):485–492, 2010

    2010

  66. [74]

    Buskohl, Andrew Gillman, Todd D

    Hiromi Y asuda, Philip R. Buskohl, Andrew Gillman, Todd D. Mur- phey, Susan Stepney, Richard A. Vaia, and Jordan R. Raney. Me- chanical computing.Nature, 598(7879):39–48, October 2021. ISSN 1476-4687. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03623-y. Bandiera_abtest: a Cg_type: Nature Research ...

    2021 doi

  67. [75]

    Deterministic function com- putation with chemical reaction networks.Natural Computing, 13(4):517–534, 2014

    Ho-Lin Chen, David Doty, and David Soloveichik. Deterministic function com- putation with chemical reaction networks.Natural Computing, 13(4):517–534, 2014

    2014

  68. [76]

    Com- putation with finite stochastic chemical reaction networks.Natural Computing, 7(4):615–633, 2008

    David Soloveichik, Matthew Cook, Erik Winfree, and Jehoshua Bruck. Com- putation with finite stochastic chemical reaction networks.Natural Computing, 7(4):615–633, 2008

    2008

  69. [77]

    Limits on the computational expressivity of non-equilibrium biophys- ical processes.Nature Communications, 16(1):7184, 2025

    Carlos Floyd, Aaron R Dinner, Arvind Murugan, and Suriyanarayanan Vaikun- tanathan. Limits on the computational expressivity of non-equilibrium biophys- ical processes.Nature Communications, 16(1):7184, 2025

    2025

  70. [78]

    Jones, Thomas E

    William Poole, Andrés Ortiz-Muñoz, Abhishek Behera, Nick S. Jones, Thomas E. Ouldridge, Erik Winfree, and Manoj Gopalkrishnan. Chemi- cal Boltzmann Machines. In Robert Brijder and Lulu Qian, editors,DNA Computing and Molecular Programming, pages 210–231, Cham, 2017. Springer I...

    2017

  71. [79]

    Detailed Balanced Chemical Reaction Networks as Generalized Boltzmann Machines.arXiv, May 2022

    William Poole, Thomas Ouldridge, Manoj Gopalkrishnan, and Erik Win- free. Detailed Balanced Chemical Reaction Networks as Generalized Boltzmann Machines.arXiv, May 2022. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2205.06313. arXiv:2205.06313 [q-bio]

    2022 doi arXiv

  72. [80]

    Jacobs and W

    William M. Jacobs and W. Benjamin Rogers. Assembly of Complex Col- loidal Systems Using DNA.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 16 (Volume 16, 2025):443–463, March 2025. ISSN 1947-5454, 1947-5462. doi: 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-032922-113138. Publisher: Annual Reviews

    2025 doi

  73. [81]

    Engineering synthetic biomolecular condensates.Nature Reviews Bioengineering, 1(7):466–480, July 2023

    Yifan Dai, Lingchong Y ou, and Ashutosh Chilkoti. Engineering synthetic biomolecular condensates.Nature Reviews Bioengineering, 1(7):466–480, July 2023. ISSN 2731-6092. doi:10.1038/s44222-023-00052-6. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2023 doi

  74. [82]

    Synthetic protein condensates for cellular and metabolic engineering.Nature Chemical Biol- ogy, 18(12):1330–1340, December 2022

    Zhi-Gang Qian, Sheng-Chen Huang, and Xiao-Xia Xia. Synthetic protein condensates for cellular and metabolic engineering.Nature Chemical Biol- ogy, 18(12):1330–1340, December 2022. ISSN 1552-4469. doi:10.1038/ s41589-022-01203-3. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2022

  75. [83]

    Shimobayashi, Y ongdae Shin, Amy R

    Ming-Tzo Wei, Yi-Che Chang, Shunsuke F . Shimobayashi, Y ongdae Shin, Amy R. Strom, and Clifford P . Brangwynne. Nucleated transcriptional con- densates amplify gene expression.Nature Cell Biology, 22(10):1187–1196, October 2020. ISSN 1476-4679. doi:10.1038/s41556-020-00578-6....

    2020 doi

  76. [84]

    Veettil, Prashant Pradhan, Christy Fornero, Nancy De La Cruz, Keiichi Ito, Mikayla Eppert, Robert G

    Heankel Lyons, Reshma T. Veettil, Prashant Pradhan, Christy Fornero, Nancy De La Cruz, Keiichi Ito, Mikayla Eppert, Robert G. Roeder, and Benjamin R. Sabari. Functional partitioning of transcriptional regulators by patterned charge blocks.Cell, 186(2):327–345.e28, January 2023...

    2023 doi

  77. [85]

    Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators.Neural Networks, 2(5):359–366, Jan- uary 1989

    Kurt Hornik, Maxwell Stinchcombe, and Halbert White. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators.Neural Networks, 2(5):359–366, Jan- uary 1989. ISSN 0893-6080. doi:10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8

    1989 doi

  78. [86]

    Duda, Peter E

    Richard O. Duda, Peter E. Hart, and David G. Stork.Pattern Classification. John Wiley & Sons, November 2012. ISBN 978-1-118-58600-6. Google- Books-ID: Br33IRC3PkQC

    2012

  79. [87]

    Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure.ACM Comput

    Franz Aurenhammer. Voronoi diagrams—a survey of a fundamental geometric data structure.ACM Comput. Surv., 23(3):345–405, September 1991. ISSN 0360-0300. doi:10.1145/116873.116880

    1991

  80. [88]

    R. O. Duda and H. Fossum. Pattern Classification by Iteratively Determined Linear and Piecewise Linear Discriminant Functions.IEEE Transactions on Electronic Computers, EC-15(2):220–232, April 1966. ISSN 0367-7508. doi: 10.1109/PGEC.1966.264302

    1966

  81. [89]

    Neural Network Computation by In Vitro Transcriptional Circuits

    Jongmin Kim, John Hopfield, and Erik Winfree. Neural Network Computation by In Vitro Transcriptional Circuits. InAdvances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, volume 17. MIT Press, 2004

    2004

  82. [90]

    Linton, Shiyu Xia, Xinwen Fan, Dingchen Yu, Jinglin Wang, Ronghui Zhu, and Michael B

    Zibo Chen, James M. Linton, Shiyu Xia, Xinwen Fan, Dingchen Yu, Jinglin Wang, Ronghui Zhu, and Michael B. Elowitz. A synthetic protein-level neu- ral network in mammalian cells.Science, 386(6727):1243–1250, December

  83. [91]

    Genot, Teruo Fujii, and Y annick Rondelez

    Anthony J. Genot, Teruo Fujii, and Y annick Rondelez. Computing with Com- petition in Biochemical Networks.Physical Review Letters, 109(20):208102, November 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.208102. Publisher: American Physical Society

    2012 doi

  84. [92]

    Genot, Teruo Fujii, and Y annick Rondelez

    Anthony J. Genot, Teruo Fujii, and Y annick Rondelez. Scaling down DNA cir- cuits with competitive neural networks.Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 10(85):20130212, August 2013. doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0212. Publisher: Royal Society

    2013

  85. [93]

    Jared A. M. Bard and D. Allan Drummond. Chaperone regulation of biomolec- ular condensates.Frontiers in Biophysics, 2, May 2024. ISSN 2813-7183. doi: 10.3389/frbis.2024.1342506. Publisher: Frontiers

    2024

  86. [94]

    A first order phase transition mech- anism underlies protein aggregation in mammalian cells.eLife, 8:e39695, February 2019

    Arjun Narayanan, Anatoli Meriin, J Owen Andrews, Jan-Hendrik Spille, Michael Y Sherman, and Ibrahim I Cisse. A first order phase transition mech- anism underlies protein aggregation in mammalian cells.eLife, 8:e39695, February 2019. ISSN 2050-084X. doi:10.7554/eLife.39695. Pub...

    2019 doi

  87. [95]

    performance

    Josiah Willard Gibbs. On the Equilibrium of Heterogeneous Substances. Other, 1879. Volume: 2. Zentneret al. 15 Supplementary Information: Information processing driven by multicomponent surface condensates Supplementary Note 1: Model A Dynamics Deriving Mean-Field Dynamics In ...

  88. [103]

    The final concentration of the desired output species should be above some threshold valueϕ max =A/N, whereN is the total number of particle species andAis a value to be specified

  89. [104]

    client" (output) and

    The final concentrations of the undesired output species should be below some thresholdϕ min =B/N, whereBis a value to be specified. These two criteria in turn enforce that the ratio of desired to undesired outputs should be above a set thresholdA/B, and that this ratio is att...

  90. [1985]

    doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(85)80012-4

    ISSN 0364-0213. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(85)80012-4

    doi

  91. [2009]

    doi:10.1083/jcb.200906113

    ISSN 0021-9525. doi:10.1083/jcb.200906113

    doi

  92. [2017]

    also appears in: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.1606.05336. also appears in: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning. 14 Zentneret al

    doi arXiv

  93. [2018]

    doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0289-6

    ISSN 1476-4687. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0289-6. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    doi

  94. [2023]

    doi:10.1002/adbi.202200180

    ISSN 2701-0198. doi:10.1002/adbi.202200180. _eprint: https://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/adbi.202200180

    doi

  95. [2024]

    Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    doi:10.1126/science.add8468. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    doi

  96. [4349]

    Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    doi:10.1038/s41557-024-01456-6. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.