Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Dark photon solitons can make up at most a few percent of dark matter, based on the absence of their predicted radio bursts.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review

2026-08-04 20:00 UTC pith:5QTKRCNH

load-bearing objection Novel application of the radio-silence method to dark photon solitons, but the claimed high-coupling exclusion is built on a population that would have already decayed, and the detection-volume conversion is miscalibrated. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.08932 v1 pith:5QTKRCNH submitted 2025-09-10 hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE

Constraining Dark Photon Dark Matter with Radio Silence from Soliton Mergers around Supermassive Black Holes

Dorian W. P. Amaral , Enrico D. Schiappacasse , Hong-Yi Zhang This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
keywords dark photon solitonsultralight vector dark matterparametric resonanceradio transientsfast radio burstssupermassive black hole dark matter spikesradio silence constraintssoliton mergers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that the non-observation of radio bursts from merging dark-photon solitons can be turned into the first quantitative bound on how much of the dark matter can be locked up in these objects. The key calculation is the soliton merger rate inside the steep dark-matter spikes that form around supermassive black holes, combining the spiked density profile with a velocity dispersion from the Jeans equation. For galaxies whose initial halo profile falls as r^-1, the total merger rate is at most about 10^-7 f_DM^2 per cubic megaparsec per day, where f_DM is the solitonic fraction of dark matter. Comparing this with the radio silence of fast radio burst surveys yields f_DM below roughly 10^-1 from the first survey, below 10^-2 from the high-latitude Parkes survey, and projects f_DM below 10^-3 for full CHIME exposure. For larger soliton fractions, the same silence excludes effective dark-photon couplings between about 10^-18 and 10^-8 GeV^-1 for dark photon masses in the range 10^-6 to 10^-4 eV.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the absence of narrowband radio bursts that would follow the merger of two subcritical dark photon solitons into a supercritical one can directly constrain the dark matter fraction stored in solitons. It computes the merger rate in the spiky dark matter halo around a supermassive black hole, using the universal spike profile and the soliton velocity dispersion derived from the spherical Jeans equation. The resulting total merger rate is at most about 10^-7 f_DM^2 Mpc^-3 day^-1, and the Poisson upper limits from fast radio burst surveys translate into f_DM at most about 7x10^-2 from the first fast radio burst study, at most about 3.5x10^-3 from the Parkes hig

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is parametric resonance: a dark photon soliton whose mass exceeds a critical threshold M_c ~ 6x10^-10 solar masses (10^-6 eV/m)(10^-10 GeV^-1/g)^(2/3) coherently converts its field energy into a brief, narrowband radio burst. Subcritical solitons do not resonate, but when two of them merge near a supermassive black hole, the remnant can exceed M_c and emit a detectable signal. The merger rate is built from the SMBH spike density profile, the Jeans-derived Maxwell-Boltzmann relative velocity distribution, and the merger cross section enhanced by gravitational focusing; the Poisson expectation from telescope exposures then converts the absence of bursts into the bound on

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes solitons remain intact and trace the spiky dark-matter distribution all the way down to twice the Schwarzschild radius, with a non-relativistic Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity dispersion from the Jeans equation; if tidal disruption, dynamical heating, or an anisotropic velocity distribution destroys this assumption, the merger rate and the resulting f_DM bounds collapse.

What would settle it

An N-body simulation showing that solitons are tidally disrupted before reaching 2r_Sch in a realistic spike would invalidate the merger-rate calculation. Alternatively, a radio observation of a burst with the predicted narrowband frequency near 200 MHz (for m ~ 10^-6 eV), duration around 20 microseconds, and energy near 10^45 erg would directly contradict the null-detection basis of the constraint.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • If the bounds hold, dark photon solitons cannot be an order-one fraction of dark matter in the probed mass range; at most a few percent of the dark matter can reside in these objects.
  • For soliton fractions above these limits, the effective photon coupling g is excluded over roughly 10^-18 to 10^-8 GeV^-1 for masses 10^-6 to 10^-4 eV, narrowing the viable parameter space for ultralight vector dark matter.
  • Full CHIME exposure would strengthen the bound to f_DM below about 2x10^-3, while a high-exposure high-frequency telescope would probe different dark photon masses and couplings.
  • The predicted signal is too bright and too short to explain the observed fast radio burst population, so the bursts would constitute a distinct class of radio transients with a specific polarization signature that could identify the vector nature of the dark matter.
  • Future low-frequency space-based surveys could extend the same method to dark photon masses below 10^-6 eV, broadening the radio-silence probe of ultralight vector fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quoted bounds assume a conservative initial density profile index gamma = 1; if real galactic centers have steeper spikes, the merger rate rises and the f_DM limits tighten, meaning the constraints are likely stronger than stated for many galaxies.
  • The Jeans treatment assumes a single, isotropic Maxwell-Boltzmann velocity dispersion for solitons inside the spike; an N-body simulation of solitons in a realistic spike could directly test whether tidal heating or an anisotropic velocity distribution changes the rate by orders of magnitude.
  • The same radio-silence logic could be applied to other dense dark matter environments, such as galaxy clusters or primordial minihalos, potentially probing soliton fractions in regimes where SMBH spikes are not present.
  • If full CHIME exposure yields no detection, f_DM below roughly 2x10^-3 would effectively rule out solitons as a dominant macroscopic dark matter component in this mass range, shifting attention to other ultralight structures or formation channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript constrains the dark-photon soliton abundance and dark-photon–photon coupling by combining a new calculation of soliton merger rates in dark-matter spikes around supermassive black holes with the absence of the predicted radio bursts in existing FRB surveys. The merger rate is obtained from a Jeans-equation treatment of the spike velocity dispersion, integrated over the SMBH mass function and redshift 0≤z≤4. The resulting limits are f_DM ≲ 10^-1 from Lorimer et al., f_DM ≲ 10^-2 from Parkes HTRU, and a projected CHIME limit f_DM ≲ 10^-3; for larger f_DM the paper excludes couplings in roughly 10^-18 GeV^-1 ≲ g ≲ 10^-8 GeV^-1 for dark-photon masses 10^-6 eV ≲ m ≲ 10^-4 eV.

Significance. If the calculation is correct, this is a genuinely new probe of ultralight vector dark matter: it uses radio silence rather than direct laboratory searches, and it addresses the soliton population in the dense spike region where rates are enhanced. The Jeans-based velocity dispersion and the resulting flat-then-M_sol^-2 scaling of the merger rate are clearly presented and represent a useful technical improvement over simple halo-averaged estimates. The main caveats are that the quantitative limits depend sensitively on the subcritical/tidal mass window and on the cosmological volume normalization, both of which need revision before the stated constraints can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.B/III.B, Eqs. (6), (10), (19); Fig. 6 and Table III] The rate in Eq. (11) requires initial solitons that are subcritical (M_sol<M_c, Eq. 6) and tidally stable (M_sol>M_tidal, Eq. 10), with 1.4 M_sol>M_c. The paper never imposes M_tidal<M_c on the initial population. For M_SMBH=10^6 M⊙ and m=10^-6 eV, Eq. (6) and Eq. (10) give M_tidal≈3e-9 M⊙ and M_c≈6e-10(1e-10/g)^{2/3} M⊙, so M_tidal<M_c only for g≲1e-11 GeV^-1. Yet Fig. 6 and Table III claim reach up to g~1e-8, and Fig. 7 evaluates fDM at M_sol down to M_tidal even where those masses are supercritical. Eq. (19) is not the missing condition: it uses the EFT upper bound at the tidal mass, not M_c>M_tidal. The high-g exclusion and the low-M_sol parts of the fDM limits should be recomputed imposing the initial window [max(M_tidal, M_c/1.4), M_c).
  2. [Sec. III.D, Eqs. (26)-(27)] The conversion from Γ_TOTAL to event count is not correct. Γ_TOTAL in Eq. (15) is already integrated over 0≤z≤4; multiplying by a single sphere V=(4/3)πD_L^3(z=4) in Eq. (26) double-counts the redshift/volume integration. Moreover, a comoving volume must be built from the comoving distance, not the luminosity distance; using D_L overestimates the volume by a factor ~(1+z)^3 (at z=4, roughly 125 for D_M=D_L/(1+z)), which shifts Γ_lim and fDM by about 125 and sqrt(125) respectively. The expectation should be λ = T_obs (A/4π) ∫_0^{z_max} dV_c/dz Γ_vol(z)/(1+z) (or the equivalent properly normalized integral). The absolute normalization of all limits in Table III therefore needs revision.
  3. [Sec. II.B, Eqs. (13)-(14), Fig. 3] The Jeans solution gives σ_DM=(1+ω)^-1/2(G_N M_SMBH/r)^1/2. At the lower limit r=2r_Sch, this is O(0.1-0.4)c for the ω in Table I, so the non-relativistic Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution in Eq. (A4) used in Eq. (12) is invalid. Since ρ_DM,sp^2 r^2 ∝ r^{2-2ω} with ω≈2, the inner boundary may dominate Γmerg, making the result sensitive to this breakdown. The same applies to the assumption that solitons trace the spike with constant f_DM down to 2r_Sch; tidal stripping and mass segregation could deplete the population. The authors should test sensitivity to the lower cutoff and to a relativistic/truncated velocity distribution.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] Typos: 'Schwarschild' (p.4), 'gravitaional' (p.5), 'Edddington' (p.7), 'correpsonding' (p.10).
  2. [Fig. 10 caption] The caption states 'we take γ=1' in all four panels although the panels are for γ=1,1.25,1.5,1.75; adjust the wording.
  3. [Sec. III.D] Specify the cosmology used for D_L and clearly distinguish luminosity distance from comoving distance; also state whether Γ_TOTAL is per cosmic time or per detector time.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the merger-rate prediction and null-search inference are forward calculations, and self-citations to prior parametric-resonance work are independent published derivations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (i) soliton properties, critical mass, and parametric-resonance signal characteristics are taken from Amin-Long-Schiappacasse [41] (with a coauthor overlap) and from Hertzberg-Li-Schiappacasse [38]; (ii) the new merger rate in SMBH spikes is computed from Eq. (11) using the external spike density profile of Ref. [68] and a Jeans-equation velocity dispersion (Eqs. 13-14); (iii) this rate for f_DM=1 is compared with telescope exposures through the Poisson null limit (Eqs. 26-27), giving f_DM limits via Eq. (28) and g-exclusion bands via the EFT and tidal-stability conditions. Each step is a forward calculation with stated assumptions; the radio non-detection data are external and are not used to fit the signal properties or the merger rate. The self-citations are to parameter-free published derivations of the critical mass and signal characteristics that do not incorporate the present paper's target constraints, so they constitute independent support rather than circularity. A possible physical-consistency concern that the M_sol window in Eq. (11) includes masses below M_c/1.4 (so those mergers would not produce supercritical remnants) is a validity/correctness issue, not a circular reduction: Eq. (11) is not defined in terms of the final f_DM constraint, and the f_DM limits are not obtained by assuming what they set out to prove. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces; the solitons, dark photons, and the parametric-resonance emission mechanism all predate this work. The main free inputs are the spike profile parameters and the chosen initial power-law index γ. The most important unstated premise is that solitons exactly trace the dark matter spike, which is required for the merger-rate integral to make sense.

free parameters (4)
  • Spike profile fit parameters (a,b,ω,η) for γ=1 = a=-1.612, b=31.35, ω=2.09, η=2.00
    Taken from Ref [68], fitted to N-body simulations of DM spikes; used as input in Eq. (8).
  • Initial DM profile index γ = 1 (fiducial; also 1.25, 1.5, 1.75)
    Chosen by hand to bracket the expected range; the headline constraints use the most conservative γ=1.
  • 95% CL Poisson threshold λ≤3 = 3
    Derived from α=0.05 via λ ≤ -ln α; a statistical choice, not fitted to data.
  • D_L(z=4) = 7332 Mpc = 7332 Mpc
    Used to define the observable volume V=(4π/3)D_L^3 in Eq. (26); appears inconsistent with standard ΛCDM luminosity distances at z=4, which are about 40 Gpc.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Dark photon soliton profile and mass-radius relation (Eqs. 2-5)
    Taken from Refs [29-31]; the paper does not rederive these and assumes their validity.
  • domain assumption Parametric resonance condition and critical mass (Eq. 6)
    Taken from Ref [41]; the radio burst mechanism and its threshold are assumed.
  • domain assumption Merger criterion v_rel ≲ 1.5 km/s (Eq. 7)
    From Refs [38,56], based on negative-total-energy condition for bound soliton mergers.
  • domain assumption Isotropic Maxwell-Boltzmann relative velocity distribution (Eq. A4)
    Assumed for soliton velocities; not derived from first principles and questionable where the dispersion becomes relativistic.
  • domain assumption Jeans equation with SMBH-dominated potential (Eq. 13)
    Assumes the spike is collisionless, isotropic, and that the gravitational potential is dominated by the SMBH, ignoring the spike's self-gravity.
  • domain assumption SMBH mass function from Ref [99]
    Used for the redshift evolution of SMBH abundance; carries the uncertainties of that model.
  • ad hoc to paper Solitons trace the DM spike with fraction f_DM at all radii
    The rate in Eq. (11) assumes solitons are a fixed fraction of the DM density everywhere in the spike, despite finite size, tidal stripping, dynamical friction, and the absence of a formation mechanism actually producing them there.

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Constraining Dark Photon Dark Matter with Radio Silence from Soliton Mergers around Supermassive Black Holes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5QTKRCNH

@misc{pith2026250908932,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Constraining Dark Photon Dark Matter with Radio Silence from Soliton Mergers around Supermassive Black Holes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5QTKRCNH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.08932}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We place the first constraints on the dark matter fraction contained within dark photon solitons using the absence of their predicted radio-frequency signatures, or radio silence, following mergers around supermassive black holes. In these dense environments, spiky dark matter density profiles can form that enhance the soliton merger rate. We present a novel estimate of this rate by incorporating both the steepened dark matter profile and the soliton velocity dispersion via the Jeans equation. For galaxies with an initial profile $\rho_\mathrm{DM} \propto r^{-1}$, we find the total merger rate across redshifts $0 \leq z \leq 4$ to be $\Gamma_{\text{merg}}^{\text{TOTAL}} \lesssim 10^{-7}f^2_{\text{DM}}\,\text{Mpc}^{-3}\,\text{day}^{-1}$, where $f_\mathrm{DM}$ is the solitonic fraction of dark matter. This enhanced rate leads to more major merger events in which the generated soliton has a mass exceeding a critical threshold, leading to its decay via the parametric resonance phenomenon that produces brief, narrowband, and energetic radio bursts detectable by fast radio burst surveys. Comparing our predictions with the non-observation of such events, we already obtain $f_\mathrm{DM} \lesssim 10^{-1}$ from the first fast radio burst study. This constraint is strengthened to $f_\mathrm{DM} \lesssim 10^{-2}$ from the Parkes HTRU survey, with CHIME projected to tighten this to $f_\mathrm{DM} \lesssim 10^{-3}$. For larger $f_\mathrm{DM}$, we instead constrain the effective coupling strength between the dark and visible sectors to lie outside $10^{-18}\,\mathrm{GeV^{-1}} \lesssim g \lesssim 10^{-8}\,\mathrm{GeV^{-1}}$ for dark photon masses in the range $10^{-6}\,\mathrm{eV} \lesssim m \lesssim 10^{-4}\,\mathrm{eV}$. Our results establish astrophysical transients as powerful probes of dark sectors, opening a window onto the detectability of ultralight vector fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.08932 by Dorian W. P. Amaral, Enrico D. Schiappacasse, Hong-Yi Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The merging of two solitons in the spiky dark matter halo around a supermassive black hole, producing a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: The spiky dark matter density profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The soliton merger rate Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The total merger rate of vector solitons in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The supermassive black hole mass function Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The range of the effective couplings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The soliton merger rate for Milky-Way-like [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The integration upper limit of Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: The total merger rate of vector solitons in DM spikes per unit volume Γ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: The 95% confidence level upper limits on the fraction of dark matter that vector solitons can compose [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dipole Radiation and Kinetic Mixing from Dark Photon Solitons

    hep-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dark photon solitons emit photons through external-field dipole radiation and kinetic mixing, offering a novel astrophysical signature for wave-like dark matter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

118 extracted references · 97 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    History of dark matter,

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper, “History of dark matter,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 045002 (2018), arXiv:1605.04909 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    Status of Dark Matter in the Universe,

    K. Freese, “Status of Dark Matter in the Universe,” Int. J. Mod. Phys.1, 325 (2017), arXiv:1701.01840 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  3. [3]

    Dark Matter,

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia, and J. Zupan, “Dark Matter,” (2024), arXiv:2406.01705 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Constraints on MACHO Dark Mat- ter from Compact Stellar Systems in Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxies,

    T. D. Brandt, “Constraints on MACHO Dark Mat- ter from Compact Stellar Systems in Ultra-Faint Dwarf Galaxies,” Astrophys. J. Lett.824, L31 (2016), arXiv:1605.03665 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies,

    N. Dalal and A. Kravtsov, “Excluding fuzzy dark matter with sizes and stellar kinematics of ultrafaint dwarf galaxies,” Phys. Rev. D106, 063517 (2022), arXiv:2203.05750 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    A Lower Bound on Dark Matter Mass,

    M. A. Amin and M. Mirbabayi, “A Lower Bound on Dark Matter Mass,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 221004 (2024), arXiv:2211.09775 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles,

    R. Essiget al., “Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles,” inSnowmass 2013: Snow- mass on the Mississippi(2013) arXiv:1311.0029 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ul- tralight Dark Matter,

    D. Antypaset al., “New Horizons: Scalar and Vector Ul- tralight Dark Matter,” (2022), arXiv:2203.14915 [hep- ex]

    arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Dynamical Role of Light Neutral Leptons in Cosmology,

    S. Tremaine and J. E. Gunn, “Dynamical Role of Light Neutral Leptons in Cosmology,” Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 407 (1979)

    1979

  10. [10]

    A New Light Boson?

    S. Weinberg, “A New Light Boson?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (1978)

    1978

  11. [11]

    Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,

    F. Wilczek, “Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  12. [12]

    The landscape of QCD axion models,

    L. Di Luzio, M. Giannotti, E. Nardi, and L. Visinelli, “The landscape of QCD axion models,” Phys. Rept. 870, 1 (2020), arXiv:2003.01100 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    String Axiverse,

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, “String Axiverse,” Phys. Rev. D 81, 123530 (2010), arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Axions and Axion-Like Particles,

    A. Ringwald, “Axions and Axion-Like Particles,” in 49th Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Inter- actions and Unified Theories(2014) pp. 223–230, arXiv:1407.0546 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  15. [15]

    Ultra-light dark matter,

    E. G. M. Ferreira, “Ultra-light dark matter,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev.29, 7 (2021), arXiv:2005.03254 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    A force beyond the Standard Model - Status of the quest for hidden photons,

    J. Jaeckel, “A force beyond the Standard Model - Status of the quest for hidden photons,” Frascati Phys. Ser.56, 172 (2012), arXiv:1303.1821 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  17. [17]

    The Dark Photon,

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, “The Dark Photon,” (2020), 10.1007/978-3-030-62519- 1, arXiv:2005.01515 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Dark photon limits: A handbook,

    A. Caputo, A. J. Millar, C. A. J. O’Hare, and E. Vitagliano, “Dark photon limits: A handbook,” Phys. Rev. D104, 095029 (2021), arXiv:2105.04565 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Vec- tor Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations,

    P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, “Vec- tor Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. D93, 103520 (2016), arXiv:1504.02102 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Vector dark matter production at the end of inflation,

    M. Bastero-Gil, J. Santiago, L. Ubaldi, and R. Vega- Morales, “Vector dark matter production at the end of inflation,” JCAP04, 015 (2019), arXiv:1810.07208 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Completely dark photons from gravitational particle production during the infla- tionary era,

    E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, “Completely dark photons from gravitational particle production during the infla- tionary era,” JHEP03, 283 (2021), arXiv:2009.03828 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Vector dark matter, infla- tion, and non-minimal couplings with gravity,

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato, “Vector dark matter, infla- tion, and non-minimal couplings with gravity,” JCAP 06, 003 (2024), arXiv:2310.03862 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Relic Abundance of Dark Pho- ton Dark Matter,

    P. Agrawal, N. Kitajima, M. Reece, T. Sekiguchi, and F. Takahashi, “Relic Abundance of Dark Pho- ton Dark Matter,” Phys. Lett. B801, 135136 (2020), arXiv:1810.07188 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Dark Photon Dark Matter Produced by Axion Oscillations,

    R. T. Co, A. Pierce, Z. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, “Dark Photon Dark Matter Produced by Axion Oscillations,” Phys. Rev. D99, 075002 (2019), arXiv:1810.07196 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Parametric Resonance Production of Ultralight Vector Dark Mat- ter,

    J. A. Dror, K. Harigaya, and V. Narayan, “Parametric Resonance Production of Ultralight Vector Dark Mat- ter,” Phys. Rev. D99, 035036 (2019), arXiv:1810.07195 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  26. [26]

    Dark Photon Dark Matter from a Network of Cosmic Strings,

    A. J. Long and L.-T. Wang, “Dark Photon Dark Matter from a Network of Cosmic Strings,” Phys. Rev. D99, 063529 (2019), arXiv:1901.03312 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    Dark photon dark matter from an oscillating dilaton,

    P. Adshead, K. D. Lozanov, and Z. J. Weiner, “Dark photon dark matter from an oscillating dilaton,” Phys. Rev. D107, 083519 (2023), arXiv:2301.07718 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Dark photon dark matter from flattened axion potentials,

    H.-Y. Zhang, P. Arias, A. Cheek, E. D. Schiap- pacasse, L. Visinelli, and L. Roszkowski, “Dark photon dark matter from flattened axion potentials,” (2025), arXiv:2507.20484 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Polarized solitons in higher- spin wave dark matter,

    M. Jain and M. A. Amin, “Polarized solitons in higher- spin wave dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D105, 056019 (2022), arXiv:2109.04892 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Polarized vector oscillons,

    H.-Y. Zhang, M. Jain, and M. A. Amin, “Polarized vector oscillons,” Phys. Rev. D105, 096037 (2022), arXiv:2111.08700 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Unified view of scalar and vec- tor dark matter solitons,

    H.-Y. Zhang, “Unified view of scalar and vec- tor dark matter solitons,” JHEP04, 174 (2025), arXiv:2406.05031 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Dark photon stars: formation and role as dark matter substructure,

    M. Gorghetto, E. Hardy, J. March-Russell, N. Song, and S. M. West, “Dark photon stars: formation and role as dark matter substructure,” JCAP08, 018 (2022), arXiv:2203.10100 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Small- scale structure in vector dark matter,

    M. A. Amin, M. Jain, R. Karur, and P. Mocz, “Small- scale structure in vector dark matter,” JCAP08, 014 (2022), arXiv:2203.11935 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    i-SPin: an integrator for multicomponent Schr¨ odinger-Poisson systems with self- interactions,

    M. Jain and M. A. Amin, “i-SPin: an integrator for multicomponent Schr¨ odinger-Poisson systems with self- interactions,” JCAP04, 053 (2023), arXiv:2211.08433 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  35. [35]

    Kinetic relaxation and Bose-star for- mation in multicomponent dark matter,

    M. Jain, M. A. Amin, J. Thomas, and W. Wanich- wecharungruang, “Kinetic relaxation and Bose-star for- mation in multicomponent dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 043535 (2023), arXiv:2304.01985 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Integrator for gen- eral spin-s Gross-Pitaevskii systems,

    M. Jain, M. A. Amin, and H. Pu, “Integrator for gen- eral spin-s Gross-Pitaevskii systems,” Phys. Rev. E108, 055305 (2023), arXiv:2305.01675 [cond-mat.quant-gas]. 20

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Novel structures and col- lapse of solitons in nonminimally gravitating dark mat- ter halos,

    J. Chen and H.-Y. Zhang, “Novel structures and col- lapse of solitons in nonminimally gravitating dark mat- ter halos,” JCAP10, 005 (2024), arXiv:2407.09265 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    Merger of Dark Matter Axion Clumps and Res- onant Photon Emission,

    M. P. Hertzberg, Y. Li, and E. D. Schiappacasse, “Merger of Dark Matter Axion Clumps and Res- onant Photon Emission,” JCAP07, 067 (2020), arXiv:2005.02405 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    Soliton merger rates and enhanced axion dark matter decay,

    X. Du, D. J. E. Marsh, M. Escudero, A. Benson, D. Blas, C. K. Pooni, and M. Fairbairn, “Soliton merger rates and enhanced axion dark matter decay,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 043019 (2024), arXiv:2301.09769 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Axion star explosions: A new source for axion indirect detection,

    M. Escudero, C. K. Pooni, M. Fairbairn, D. Blas, X. Du, and D. J. E. Marsh, “Axion star explosions: A new source for axion indirect detection,” Phys. Rev. D109, 043018 (2024), arXiv:2302.10206 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Photons from dark photon solitons via parametric res- onance,

    M. A. Amin, A. J. Long, and E. D. Schiappacasse, “Photons from dark photon solitons via parametric res- onance,” JCAP05, 015 (2023), arXiv:2301.11470 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Vec- tor dark matter halo: From polarization dynamics to direct detection,

    J. Chen, L. H. Nguyen, and D. J. E. Marsh, “Vec- tor dark matter halo: From polarization dynamics to direct detection,” Phys. Rev. D111, 043031 (2025), arXiv:2407.17315 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Electromagnetic Bursts from Mergers of Oscillons in Axion-like Fields,

    M. A. Amin and Z.-G. Mou, “Electromagnetic Bursts from Mergers of Oscillons in Axion-like Fields,” JCAP 02, 024 (2021), arXiv:2009.11337 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  44. [44]

    The swing: parametric resonance,

    A. Seyranian, “The swing: parametric resonance,” Jour- nal of applied mathematics and mechanics68, 757 (2004)

    2004

  45. [45]

    Tunable modulational instability sidebands via parametric resonance in pe- riodically tapered optical fibers,

    A. Armaroli and F. Biancalana, “Tunable modulational instability sidebands via parametric resonance in pe- riodically tapered optical fibers,” Optics Express20, 25096 (2012), arXiv:1208.3484 [physics.optics]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Parametric amplification in optical fi- bre with longitudinally varying dispersion,

    Y. A. Mazhirina, L. A. Mel’nikov, A. A. Sysoliatin, A. I. Konyukhov, K. S. Gochelashvili, D. Venkitesh, and S. Sarkar, “Parametric amplification in optical fi- bre with longitudinally varying dispersion,” Quantum Electronics51, 692 (2021)

    2021

  47. [47]

    Vector modulational instability induced by parametric resonance in period- ically tapered highly birefringent optical fibers,

    A. Armaroli and F. Biancalana, “Vector modulational instability induced by parametric resonance in period- ically tapered highly birefringent optical fibers,” Phys. Rev. A87, 063848 (2013)

    2013

  48. [48]

    Two resonances of para- metric time varying circuit (review),

    N. Biryuk and A. Krivtsov, “Two resonances of para- metric time varying circuit (review),” Radioelectron. Commun. Syst.62, 431 (2019)

    2019

  49. [49]

    Reheating after inflation,

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3195 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9405187

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  50. [50]

    Uni- verse reheating after inflation,

    Y. Shtanov, J. Traschen, and R. Brandenberger, “Uni- verse reheating after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D51, 5438 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9407247 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  51. [51]

    Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review,

    M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser, and J. Karouby, “Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating After Inflation: A Review,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1530003 (2014), arXiv:1410.3808 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  52. [52]

    FRBCAT: The Fast Radio Burst Cat- alogue,

    E. Petroff, E. D. Barr, A. Jameson, E. F. Keane, M. Bailes, M. Kramer, V. Morello, D. Tabbara, and W. van Straten, “FRBCAT: The Fast Radio Burst Cat- alogue,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.33, e045 (2016), arXiv:1601.03547 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    Fast radio bursts,

    J. I. Katz, “Fast radio bursts,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 103, 1 (2018), arXiv:1804.09092 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Fast Radio Bursts,

    E. Petroff, J. W. T. Hessels, and D. R. Lorimer, “Fast Radio Bursts,” Astron. Astrophys. Rev.27, 4 (2019)

    2019

  55. [55]

    Dark Matter Axion Clump Resonance of Photons,

    M. P. Hertzberg and E. D. Schiappacasse, “Dark Matter Axion Clump Resonance of Photons,” JCAP11, 004 (2018), arXiv:1805.00430 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  56. [56]

    Dark Spin-2 Field Soli- tons as a Source of Electromagnetic Radiation,

    E. D. Schiappacasse, “Dark Spin-2 Field Soli- tons as a Source of Electromagnetic Radiation,” JCAP08(2025), 10.1088/1475-7516/2025/08/085, arXiv:2503.12569 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Scalar field dark matter: Nonspherical collapse and late-time behavior,

    A. Bernal and F. S. Guzm´ an, “Scalar field dark matter: Nonspherical collapse and late-time behavior,” Phys. Rev. D74, 063504 (2006)

    2006

  58. [58]

    Interference pattern in the collision of structures in the bose-einstein conden- sate dark matter model: Comparison with fluids,

    J. A. Gonz´ alez and F. S. Guzm´ an, “Interference pattern in the collision of structures in the bose-einstein conden- sate dark matter model: Comparison with fluids,” Phys. Rev. D83, 103513 (2011)

    2011

  59. [59]

    Interference of bose condensates,

    M. Naraschewski, H. Wallis, A. Schenzle, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, “Interference of bose condensates,” Phys. Rev. A54, 2185 (1996)

    1996

  60. [60]

    Transition from phase locking to the interference of independent bose condensates: Theory versus exper- iment,

    A. R¨ ohrl, M. Naraschewski, A. Schenzle, and H. Wal- lis, “Transition from phase locking to the interference of independent bose condensates: Theory versus exper- iment,” Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 4143 (1997)

    1997

  61. [61]

    Dynamical Family Properties and Dark Halo Scaling Relations of Giant Elliptical Galaxies,

    O. Gerhard, A. Kronawitter, R. P. Saglia, and R. Ben- der, “Dynamical Family Properties and Dark Halo Scaling Relations of Giant Elliptical Galaxies,” The Astronomical Journal121, 1936 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0012381 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 1936

  62. [62]

    The Universal Rotation Curve of Spiral Galaxies. 2. The Dark Matter Distribution out to the Virial Radius,

    P. Salucci, A. Lapi, C. Tonini, G. Gentile, I. Yegorova, and U. Klein, “The Universal Rotation Curve of Spiral Galaxies. 2. The Dark Matter Distribution out to the Virial Radius,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.378, 41 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0703115

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  63. [63]

    Measuring the mass and concen- tration of dark matter halos from the velocity dispersion profile of their stars,

    S. Bose and A. Loeb, “Measuring the mass and concen- tration of dark matter halos from the velocity dispersion profile of their stars,” Astrophys. J.912, 114 (2021), arXiv:2010.15123 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Inward Bound—The Search For Supermassive Black Holes In Galactic Nu- clei,

    J. Kormendy and D. Richstone, “Inward Bound—The Search For Supermassive Black Holes In Galactic Nu- clei,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 33, 581 (1995)

    1995

  65. [65]

    Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies,

    J. Kormendy and L. C. Ho, “Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics51, 511 (2013), arXiv:1304.7762 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  66. [66]

    Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center,

    P. Gondolo and J. Silk, “Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center,” Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1719 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9906391

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  67. [67]

    Annihilation radiation from a dark matter spike at the galactic center,

    G. Bertone, G. Sigl, and J. Silk, “Annihilation radiation from a dark matter spike at the galactic center,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.337, 98 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0203488

    arXiv 2002

  68. [68]

    Universal Den- sity and Velocity Distributions of Dark Matter around Massive Black Holes,

    Z.-C. Zhang, H.-C. Yuan, and Y. Tang, “Universal Den- sity and Velocity Distributions of Dark Matter around Massive Black Holes,” (2025), arXiv:2503.02573 [astro- ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    The First Robust Evidence Showing a Dark Matter Density Spike Around the Su- permassive Black Hole in OJ 287,

    M. H. Chan and C. M. Lee, “The First Robust Evidence Showing a Dark Matter Density Spike Around the Su- permassive Black Hole in OJ 287,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 962, L40 (2024), arXiv:2402.03751 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Either neutralino dark matter or cuspy dark halos,

    P. Gondolo, “Either neutralino dark matter or cuspy dark halos,” Physics Letters B494, 181 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0002226 [hep-ph]. 21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  71. [71]

    Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess from Dark Matter Annihi- lation: Is There A Black Hole Spike?

    B. D. Fields, S. L. Shapiro, and J. Shelton, “Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess from Dark Matter Annihi- lation: Is There A Black Hole Spike?” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151302 (2014), arXiv:1406.4856 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Unique probe of dark matter in the core of M87 with the Event Horizon Telescope,

    T. Lacroix, M. Karami, A. E. Broderick, J. Silk, and C. Boehm, “Unique probe of dark matter in the core of M87 with the Event Horizon Telescope,” Phys. Rev. D 96, 063008 (2017), arXiv:1611.01961 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [73]

    Search for gamma-ray line signals around the black hole at the galactic center with DAMPE observation,

    T.-C. Liu, J.-G. Cheng, Y.-F. Liang, and E.-W. Liang, “Search for gamma-ray line signals around the black hole at the galactic center with DAMPE observation,” Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy65, 269512 (2022), arXiv:2203.08078 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Dark matter spikes around Sgr A* inγ-rays,

    S. Balaji, D. Sachdeva, F. Sala, and J. Silk, “Dark matter spikes around Sgr A* inγ-rays,” JCAP08, 063 (2023), arXiv:2303.12107 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    A bright millisecond radio burst of extragalactic origin,

    D. R. Lorimer, M. Bailes, M. A. McLaughlin, D. J. Narkevic, and F. Crawford, “A bright millisecond radio burst of extragalactic origin,” Science318, 777 (2007), arXiv:0709.4301 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  76. [76]

    A search for rotating radio transients and fast radio bursts in the Parkes high-latitude pulsar survey,

    A. Rane, D. R. Lorimer, S. D. Bates, N. McMann, M. A. McLaughlin, and K. Rajwade, “A search for rotating radio transients and fast radio bursts in the Parkes high-latitude pulsar survey,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society455, 2207 (2016), arXiv:1505.00834 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  77. [77]

    Limits on the ultra-bright Fast Radio Burst population from the CHIME Pathfinder,

    M. Amiriet al.(CHIME Scientific), “Limits on the ultra-bright Fast Radio Burst population from the CHIME Pathfinder,” Astrophys. J.844, 161 (2017), arXiv:1702.08040 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  78. [78]

    The dispersion-brightness relation for fast radio bursts from a wide-field survey,

    R. M. Shannon, J. P. Macquart, K. W. Bannister, R. D. Ekers, C. W. James, S. Os lowski, H. Qiu, M. Sam- mons, A. W. Hotan, M. A. Voronkov, R. J. Beres- ford, M. Brothers, A. J. Brown, J. D. Bunton, A. P. Chippendale, C. Haskins, M. Leach, M. Marquarding, D. McConnell, M. A. Pilawa, E. M. Sadler, E. R. Troup, J. Tuthill, M. T. Whiting, J. R. Allison, C. S....

    2018

  79. [79]

    Highest Frequency Detection of FRB 121102 at 4–8 GHz Using the Breakthrough Listen Dig- ital Backend at the Green Bank Telescope,

    V. Gajjaret al., “Highest Frequency Detection of FRB 121102 at 4–8 GHz Using the Breakthrough Listen Dig- ital Backend at the Green Bank Telescope,” Astrophys. J.863, 2 (2018), arXiv:1804.04101 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [80]

    Gravitational microlensing by dark matter in extended structures,

    D. Croon, D. McKeen, and N. Raj, “Gravitational microlensing by dark matter in extended structures,” Phys. Rev. D101, 083013 (2020), arXiv:2002.08962 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.