Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 26 references

A novel cost-effective fabrication of a flexible neural probe for brain signal recording

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A low-cost flexible neural probe made from Kapton film records local field potentials as faithfully as a commercial tungsten electrode.

desk verdict A promising low-cost flexible probe fabrication, but the in vivo validation compares apples to oranges across birds and needs a same-subject control before the recording claim holds. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.09213 v1 pith:HCTNTEKH submitted 2025-09-11 q-bio.NC

Alireza Irandoost , Amirreza Bahramani , Roya Mohajeri , Faezeh Shahdost-Fard , Ali Ghazizadeh , Mehdi Fardmanesh This is my paper · ORCID
classification q-bio.NC
keywords flexibleneuralprobeKaptonlocalfieldpotentialmicrofabricationgoldmicroelectrodeimpedancespectroscopyzebrafinchSU-8
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates a fabrication route for a flexible multi-electrode neural probe using cheap, readily available materials: a Kapton (polyimide) film substrate, gold microelectrode sites, and SU-8 insulation. The process avoids expensive photosensitive polyimide resins by using cutter plotting and standard photolithography, yielding a four-channel probe with 440 kΩ impedance at 1 kHz, lower than a typical tungsten wire electrode. In vivo recordings from the HVC of an anesthetized zebra finch show LFP responses to song that closely match those obtained with a commercial electrode, supporting the claim that the probe reliably captures neural activity. If correct, this makes flexible, multi-site brain recording probes substantially cheaper to produce.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the combination of a pre-cut Kapton film as a flexible, rough substrate; a thin gold layer deposited directly on it without an adhesion promoter; and SU-8 photoresist used both as an insulating layer over the tracks and as a backside stiffener to aid insertion. The roughness of the Kapton surface is exploited to increase the effective surface area of the gold electrodes, lowering impedance to 440 kΩ at 1 kHz, which is favorable for LFP recording. The fabrication flow replaces expensive photosensitive polyimide with a simple cutter-plotter and standard photolithography, which is the main cost-reduction step.

What would settle it

Insert the fabricated probe and a commercial tungsten electrode side-by-side into the same brain region of the same animal and present the same auditory stimuli; if the LFP responses differ substantially in timing or spectral content, the claim that the probe faithfully records neural activity is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a flexible neural probe fabricated from Kapton film, with four 30-µm gold recording sites, an SU-8 insulating layer, and a stiffening backside coating, can record LFP signals with fidelity comparable to a commercial tungsten electrode. The probe achieves 440 kΩ impedance at 1 kHz, which the authors attribute to the rough Kapton surface increasing the effective gold surface area. In vivo data from the HVC nucleus of a male zebra finch show a mean LFP response to a conspecific song that is nearly identical in pattern to that recorded with a tungsten wire electrode, although the two recordings used different birds, probe positions, and impedances. The authors conclude

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the similarity between the LFP recorded by the new probe from one bird and the LFP recorded by a commercial tungsten electrode from another bird proves the new probe records neural activity properly; if that similarity is instead a generic brain response that any electrode in HVC would capture, the claim of recording fidelity collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A four-channel flexible probe with 440 kΩ impedance at 1 kHz can record LFP signals in vivo.
  • The fabrication method can be reproduced with standard lab equipment, reducing cost and hazardous materials.
  • The use of biocompatible Kapton, gold, and SU-8 makes the probe suitable for chronic implantation.
  • The technique could be adapted to other implantable neural devices.
  • The probe's larger electrode area is suitable for LFP but makes spike detection difficult in vivo.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The validation is cross-animal: the fabricated probe was tested in one bird and the tungsten electrode in another, so the similarity in LFP patterns may reflect generic HVC responses to song rather than probe fidelity; a direct same-animal, same-site comparison would strengthen the claim.
  • The low impedance from surface roughness suggests that further reducing electrode size to favor spike recording could be compensated by nanostructuring the gold surface.
  • If the cost reduction scales, dense multi-channel flexible probes could become disposable for acute experiments, enabling broader use in animal research.
  • The fabrication method could be extended to other flexible substrates with tailored stiffness to tune insertion mechanics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a low-cost fabrication route for a flexible, four-channel neural probe on a Kapton substrate with gold electrodes, SU-8 insulation, and backside stiffening. The authors characterize the electrodes by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (reporting 440 kOhm at 1 kHz), test the probe with a simulated neural signal in saline, and perform acute LFP recordings from HVC of an anesthetized zebra finch presented with song stimuli. The central claim, that the probe is capable of properly recording neural activity, is based on a qualitative comparison between the LFP recorded with the fabricated probe (from one bird) and an LFP previously recorded with a commercial tungsten electrode (from a different bird).

Significance. If the validation were sound, the work would be of practical interest: it demonstrates a genuinely low-cost, accessible fabrication process for flexible neural probes, avoiding photosensitive polyimide resin and an intermediate adhesion layer, and it provides EIS, simulated-signal, and acute in vivo data. The use of a commercial tungsten electrode as an external benchmark is conceptually appropriate. However, the current validation does not establish the central claim as stated, because the comparison is uncontrolled across animals, positions, and recording sessions, and no quantitative similarity measure is provided. The fabrication and basic characterization are useful, but the load-bearing validation is under-supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.4, Fig. 4(d)–(e)] The central validation is the claimed 'nearly identical' LFP between the fabricated probe (bird A) and a commercial tungsten electrode (bird B). These recordings are from different individuals, different electrode positions, and different recording sessions; the authors explicitly attribute power differences to 'different probe impedances, positions, and two distinct birds.' No correlation, coherence, SNR, or statistical comparison is reported. HVC responses to conspecific song are stereotyped across birds, so the observed similarity may reflect generic auditory-evoked activity rather than faithful recording by the fabricated probe. This is load-bearing for the paper's main claim. A same-subject, same-depth, quantitative comparison (ideally with the two electrodes at or near the same site) is needed, together with error bars and a similarity metric.
  2. [§3.3, Fig. 3(a)–(d)] The saline simulation demonstrates only that the probe can transmit an injected synthetic signal through a conductive medium. It does not establish that in vivo LFPs are faithfully recorded: the stimulus is generated by a simulator and delivered via a wire, so the test does not replicate the local current-source geometry, amplitude, or frequency content of real neural activity. No calibration, signal-to-noise quantification, or comparison with a known electrode in the same setup is given. This limitation should be stated and the claims about in vivo fidelity should rest on a proper in vivo comparison.
  3. [§3.2, Fig. 3(b)] The claim that the 440 kOhm impedance at 1 kHz is 'low' and 'necessary for acquiring LFP signals' is not benchmarked. For a 30-micrometer gold site, this value is plausible, but the manuscript does not compare it with typical LFP electrodes or with the noise requirements of the recording system, nor does it report the phase of the impedance or the variability across the four sites. If the impedance is a selling point, a benchmark or a noise-level calculation should be provided. This is a supporting issue, but it affects the characterization claims in Table 1.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2/§3.3] There are two different figures labeled 'Fig. 3' (EIS in §3.2 and simulated signal in §3.3). This must be renumbered. Also, the reference to 'Fig. 5(f)' in §3.4 is nonexistent; the LFP time-frequency panel is presumably part of Fig. 4. 'Table .1' should be 'Table 1.'
  2. [§2.2] There is corrupted text: 'titaniu006D' should be 'titanium.' Other typos include 'simualted' in §3.3 and 'Scheme. 1' vs 'Scheme 1.' A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  3. [§3.4] Experimental details for the commercial tungsten electrode are missing: model, site diameter/impedance, recording depth, and whether the 'previously recorded' LFP was from the same laboratory or a different study. Also missing: number of birds used for the fabricated probe, exact probe depth, and how many of the four channels were used in the mean. These details are needed for reproducibility.
  4. [General] No raw data or analysis code are provided. For a validation claim of this type, at least the mean LFP traces and trial-by-trial variability should be available; ideally the raw recordings should be deposited.
  5. [References] Reference [5] appears to be a self-citation and is incomplete ('Fabrication of a Low-Cost Multi-Electrode Neural Probe for Brain Signal Recording' with no journal, year, or DOI). Its novelty overlap with the present work should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the probe validation uses an external commercial-electrode benchmark; weaknesses are experimental-control limitations, not circular derivation.

full rationale

This is an experimental fabrication-and-characterization paper with no formal derivation chain, so the circularity burden is low. The central claim—that the fabricated Kapton/Au probe can record LFPs—is supported by three independent checks: electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (Section 3.2), a saline-bath test with a Blackrock neural signal simulator (Section 3.3), and an in vivo comparison with a commercial tungsten electrode (Section 3.4). None of these steps fits a parameter to the outcome being predicted, and no target quantity is defined in terms of the probe's own measurements. The only self-citation, ref. [5], appears in a general introductory list of prior probe developments and is not load-bearing; it does not justify the central validation claim or forbid alternative interpretations. The in vivo validation is indeed weaker than ideal because the commercial-electrode LFP was recorded from a different bird, so the observed 'nearly identical' pattern could reflect stereotyped HVC evoked activity rather than probe fidelity. However, that is an experimental-control and generalizability limitation, not circularity: the comparison is external, the authors explicitly attribute power differences to probe impedance, position, and the use of two distinct birds, and no equation or fitted input reduces to the paper's own outputs. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or known result is smuggled in via self-citation, and no known empirical pattern is merely renamed. Therefore the paper receives a circularity score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its design choices (electrode size, layer thicknesses) are ad hoc hand selections rather than derived from a model. The central assumptions are that material biocompatibility and HVC responsiveness, taken from literature, transfer to this uncharacterized probe. No free parameters are fitted to data in a mathematical sense; the design values are chosen to satisfy qualitative performance goals.

free parameters (5)
  • Electrode diameter 30 um = 30 um
    Chosen by hand to provide 'low impedance' per the paper, but no model or optimization is shown.
  • Electrode spacing 100 um = 100 um
    Chosen for the probe layout; no rationale for the spacing is given.
  • Top SU-8 layer thickness 5 um = 5 um
    Selected for insulation; no electrical or mechanical analysis supports this value.
  • Backside SU-8 thickness 20 um = 20 um
    Added to increase stiffness; the target stiffness is not quantified or tied to insertion performance.
  • Au layer thickness 200 nm = 200 nm
    Used for electrodes and tracks; no analysis of required thickness for conductivity or stability.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Kapton, SU-8, and Au are biocompatible and non-toxic for brain implantation.
    The paper asserts biocompatibility based on references [13-19], but performs no biocompatibility tests itself. The in vivo safety of this specific probe is not demonstrated.
  • domain assumption HVC neurons in anesthetized adult male zebra finches respond to conspecific song with LFP modulation in Delta and Theta bands.
    The interpretation of the recorded LFP as a valid neural response relies on prior findings [24-26]. The paper does not independently verify that the response is stimulus-specific beyond a single example.
  • domain assumption The saline solution with conductivity 12 mS/cm is an appropriate medium for simulated spike transmission.
    Used in the simulated neural spike test; the choice is asserted without control experiments or comparison to tissue conductivity.
  • domain assumption Morse wavelet parameters (gamma=3, time-bandwidth=60) are appropriate for LFP time-frequency analysis.
    The choice is stated without justification or comparison to other analysis methods, and the results depend on this parameterization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A novel cost-effective fabrication of a flexible neural probe for brain signal recording." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HCTNTEKH

@misc{pith2026250909213,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A novel cost-effective fabrication of a flexible neural probe for brain signal recording},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HCTNTEKH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.09213}
}
read the original abstract

This study introduces a novel, flexible, and implantable neural probe using a cost-effective microfabrication process based on a thin polyimide film. Polyimide film, known as Kapton, serves as a flexible substrate for microelectrodes, conductive tracks, and contact pads of the probe, which are made from a thin film of gold (Au). SU-8 is used to cover the corresponding tracks for electrical isolation and to increase the stiffness of the probe for better implantation. To evaluate the performance of the fabricated probe, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and artificial neural signal recording have been used to characterize its properties. The microelectrode dimensions have been carefully chosen to provide low impedance characteristics, which are necessary for acquiring local field potential (LFP) signals. The in vivo LFP data have been obtained from a male zebra finch presented with auditory stimuli. By properly filtering the extracellular recordings and analyzing the data, the obtained results have been validated by comparing them with the signals acquired with a commercial neural electrode. Due to the use of Kapton, SU-8, and Au materials with non-toxic and adaptable properties in the body environment, the fabricated neural probe is considered a promising biocompatible implantable neural probe that may pave the way for the fabrication of other neural implantable devices with commercial aims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.09213 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structure of Kapton (b) Chemical structure of SU-8 photoresist. (c) Isometric view of the designed neural probe (the unit of annotated numbers is in millimeters) (d) optical microscopy image of the probe with embedded four traces connecting microelectrodes to contact pads, (e) four microelectrodes and (f) contact pads and tracks after mounting. The Kapton film with a thickness of 50 µm was cut with a cu… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. The response of the LFP signal to the presented song stimulus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Stimulus presentation can enhance spiking irregularity across subcortical and cortical regions

    S. Fayaz, M. Fakharian, and A. Ghazizadeh, “Stimulus presentation can enhance spiking irregularity across subcortical and cortical regions.” Dryad, p. 8952225 bytes, Jun. 06, 2022. doi: 10.5061/DRYAD.0CFXPNW2C

    work page doi:10.5061/dryad.0cfxpnw2c 2022

  2. [2]

    A 32-site neural recording probe fabricated by DRIE of SOI substrates,

    P. Norlin, M. Kindlundh, A. Mouroux, K. Yoshida, and U. G. Hofmann, “A 32-site neural recording probe fabricated by DRIE of SOI substrates,” J. Micromechanics Microengineering, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 414–419, Jul. 2002, doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/12/4/312

    work page doi:10.1088/0960-1317/12/4/312 2002

  3. [3]

    A novel method of fabricating convoluted shaped electrode arrays for neural and retinal prostheses,

    R. Bhandari, S. Negi, L. Rieth, R. A. Normann, and F. Solzbacher, “A novel method of fabricating convoluted shaped electrode arrays for neural and retinal prostheses,” Sens. Actuators Phys., vol. 145–146, pp. 123–130, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.sna.2007.10.072

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sna.2007.10.072 2008

  4. [4]

    Thermal and optical characterization of micro-LED probes for in vivo optogenetic neural stimulation,

    N. McAlinden et al., “Thermal and optical characterization of micro-LED probes for in vivo optogenetic neural stimulation,” Opt. Lett., vol. 38, no. 6, p. 992, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1364/OL.38.000992

    work page doi:10.1364/ol.38.000992 2013

  5. [5]

    Fabrication of a Low-Cost Multi-Electrode Neural Probe for Brain Signal Recording

    M. A. Irandoost, R. Mohajeri, M. A. Bahramani, M. A. GhaziZadeh, and M. Fardmanesh, “Fabrication of a Low-Cost Multi-Electrode Neural Probe for Brain Signal Recording”

  6. [6]

    Flexible Neural Probes with Electrochemical Modified Microelectrodes for Artifact-Free Optogenetic Applications,

    B. Guo et al., “Flexible Neural Probes with Electrochemical Modified Microelectrodes for Artifact-Free Optogenetic Applications,” Int. J. Mol. Sci., vol. 22, no. 21, p. 11528, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijms222111528

    work page doi:10.3390/ijms222111528 2021

  7. [7]

    Recent Progress on Microelectrodes in Neural Interfaces,

    G. Kim et al., “Recent Progress on Microelectrodes in Neural Interfaces,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 10, p. 1995, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.3390/ma11101995

    work page doi:10.3390/ma11101995 1995

  8. [8]

    A Flexible Depth Probe Using Liquid Crystal Polymer,

    Sung Eun Lee et al., “A Flexible Depth Probe Using Liquid Crystal Polymer,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 2085–2094, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2196274

    arXiv

Show all 26 references
  1. [9]

    Self-assembled multifunctional neural probes for precise integration of optogenetics and electrophysiology

    L. Zou, “Self-assembled multifunctional neural probes for precise integration of optogenetics and electrophysiology”

  2. [10]

    Acute in vivo testing of a conformal polymer microelectrode array for multi-region hippocampal recordings,

    H. Xu, A. W. Hirschberg, K. Scholten, T. W. Berger, D. Song, and E. Meng, “Acute in vivo testing of a conformal polymer microelectrode array for multi-region hippocampal recordings,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 15, no. 1, p. 016017, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa9451

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    High‐Density Stretchable Electrode Grids for Chronic Neural Recording,

    K. Tybrandt et al., “High‐Density Stretchable Electrode Grids for Chronic Neural Recording,” Adv. Mater., vol. 30, no. 15, p. 1706520, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1002/adma.201706520

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    A review on mechanical considerations for chronically- implanted neural probes,

    A. Lecomte, E. Descamps, and C. Bergaud, “A review on mechanical considerations for chronically- implanted neural probes,” J. Neural Eng., vol. 15, no. 3, p. 031001, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1088/1741- 2552/aa8b4f

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    A flexible neural implant with ultrathin substrate for low-invasive brain–computer interface applications,

    Z. Guo et al., “A flexible neural implant with ultrathin substrate for low-invasive brain–computer interface applications,” Microsyst. Nanoeng., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 133, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41378-022-00464-1

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    Influence of Surface Texture in Additively Manufactured Biocompatible Materials and Triboelectric Behavior,

    P. I. Brăileanu and N. E. Pascu, “Influence of Surface Texture in Additively Manufactured Biocompatible Materials and Triboelectric Behavior,” Materials, vol. 18, no. 14, p. 3366, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.3390/ma18143366

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    Damage and degradation of mechanical properties of polyimide-based materials under atomic oxygen attack: A molecular dynamics simulation study,

    D. Wei, F. Zeng, and J. Cui, “Damage and degradation of mechanical properties of polyimide-based materials under atomic oxygen attack: A molecular dynamics simulation study,” Comput. Mater. Sci., vol. 243, p. 113110, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.113110

    2024

  8. [16]

    In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility and chondro-inductive potential of Kapton® for cartilage tissue engineering,

    M. Andrani et al., “In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility and chondro-inductive potential of Kapton® for cartilage tissue engineering,” Res. Vet. Sci., vol. 193, p. 105755, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105755

    2025

  9. [17]

    A bio-enabled maximally mild layer-by-layer Kapton surface modification approach for the fabrication of all-inkjet-printed flexible electronic devices,

    Y . Fang, J. G. D. Hester, W. Su, J. H. Chow, S. K. Sitaraman, and M. M. Tentzeris, “A bio-enabled maximally mild layer-by-layer Kapton surface modification approach for the fabrication of all-inkjet-printed flexible electronic devices,” Sci. Rep., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 39909, Dec...

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    Biocompatibility of SU-8 and Its Biomedical Device Applications,

    Z. Chen and J.-B. Lee, “Biocompatibility of SU-8 and Its Biomedical Device Applications,” Micromachines, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 794, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.3390/mi12070794

    2021 doi

  11. [19]

    In vitro and in vivo evaluation of SU-8 biocompatibility,

    K. V . Nemani, K. L. Moodie, J. B. Brennick, A. Su, and B. Gimi, “In vitro and in vivo evaluation of SU-8 biocompatibility,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 4453–4459, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.001

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    The neural tissue around SU-8 implants: A quantitative in vivo biocompatibility study,

    G. Márton et al., “The neural tissue around SU-8 implants: A quantitative in vivo biocompatibility study,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, vol. 112, p. 110870, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110870

    2020

  13. [21]

    Study of cellular behaviors on concave and convex microstructures fabricated from elastic PDMS membranes,

    J. Y . Park, D. H. Lee, E. J. Lee, and S.-H. Lee, “Study of cellular behaviors on concave and convex microstructures fabricated from elastic PDMS membranes,” Lab. Chip, vol. 9, no. 14, p. 2043, 2009, doi: 10.1039/b820955c

    doi

  14. [22]

    Fabrication of Circuits on Flexible Substrates Using Conductive SU -8 for Sensing Applications,

    C. Gerardo, E. Cretu, and R. Rohling, “Fabrication of Circuits on Flexible Substrates Using Conductive SU -8 for Sensing Applications,” Sensors, vol. 17, no. 6, p. 1420, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.3390/s17061420

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    An ultra-sparse code underliesthe generation of neural sequences in a songbird,

    R. H. R. Hahnloser, A. A. Kozhevnikov, and M. S. Fee, “An ultra-sparse code underliesthe generation of neural sequences in a songbird,” Nature, vol. 419, no. 6902, pp. 65–70, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1038/nature00974

    2002 doi

  16. [24]

    Temporal and Spectral Sensitivity of Complex Auditory Neurons in the Nucleus HVc of Male Zebra Finches,

    F. E. Theunissen and A. J. Doupe, “Temporal and Spectral Sensitivity of Complex Auditory Neurons in the Nucleus HVc of Male Zebra Finches,” J. Neurosci., vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 3786–3802, May 1998, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-10-03786.1998

    1998

  17. [25]

    Temporal and harmonic combination-sensitive neurons in the zebra finch’s HVc,

    D. Margoliash and E. Fortune, “Temporal and harmonic combination-sensitive neurons in the zebra finch’s HVc,” J. Neurosci., vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 4309–4326, Nov. 1992, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-11-04309.1992

    1992

  18. [26]

    J. T. Sakata, S. C. Woolley, R. R. Fay, and A. N. Popper, Eds., The Neuroethology of Birdsong, vol. 71. in Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol. 71. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-34683-6

    2020 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.