Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

A toroidal current loop around a Schwarzschild black hole can trap charged particles into radiation-belt-like structures whose collective drift current opposes the loop's field, with the charged-particle innermost stable circular orbit sett

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 16:46 UTC pith:KXWWV23J

load-bearing objection Solid, careful extension of charged-particle dynamics to the exact current-loop magnetosphere; the analytical core holds, but the advertised ring-current/radiation-belt conclusion is inferred, not derived, and needs either a real current-density calculation or a softer claim. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2509.11518 v2 pith:KXWWV23J submitted 2025-09-15 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Charged particle dynamics in magnetosphere generated by current loop around Schwarzschild black hole

Martin Kolo\v{s} , David Kofro\v{n} This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.HE PACS 04.70.-s95.30.Sf
keywords charged particle dynamicsSchwarzschild black holecurrent loop magnetosphereradiation beltseffective potentialring currentinnermost stable circular orbitgeneral relativity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that an equatorial current loop around a non-rotating black hole generates a magnetosphere in which charged particles can be trapped, accumulated, and organized into toroidal structures reminiscent of planetary radiation belts. Using an exact general-relativistic solution for the loop's magnetic field, the authors split the dynamics into attractive and repulsive Lorentz-force configurations; in the attractive case the effective potential develops a depression beside the loop and particles accumulate there. They argue that the accumulated particles' collective toroidal drift forms a ring current opposing the loop's magnetic field, so the magnetosphere screens its own source. If correct, the model provides a simple analytic arena for studying charged-particle trapping, magnetic screening, and radiation-belt formation around black holes, and it identifies the charged-particle innermost stable circular orbit as the inner boundary for such belts.

Core claim

The central discovery claimed is that charged test particles can accumulate near an equatorial current loop around a Schwarzschild black hole and collectively generate a ring current that opposes the loop's own magnetic field, creating radiation-belt-like toroidal structures. For attractive Lorentz force (B=qI/m>0) the effective potential has a minimum near the loop, so particles ionized from a neutral disk become trapped on bound orbits around the loop; their toroidal motion adds up to a drift current that reduces the original field. For repulsive Lorentz force (B<0), particles are expelled from the loop and can instead form off-equatorial stable structures above the loop. General relativit

What carries the argument

The engine of the analysis is the closed-form vector potential Aφ(r,θ) for a delta-function equatorial current loop in Schwarzschild spacetime—a Debye-potential solution of Maxwell's equations written in elliptic integrals—together with the charged-test-particle effective potential V_eff(r,θ)=f(r)[1+(L−BAφ)^2/r^2]. The sign of B=qI/m selects the Lorentz-force orientation: attractive toward the loop (B>0) or repulsive away from it (B<0). Because Aφ diverges exactly at the loop, V_eff has an infinite central barrier; the trapping occurs in minima flanking that barrier. Circular-orbit stability is then mapped through the angular-momentum function LC(r), epicyclic frequencies, and the charged-pa

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that macroscopic currents can be inferred from non-interacting test-particle trajectories: Section IV never computes back-reaction, space charge, or the self-field of the trapped particles, so if those effects alter the field configuration the claimed opposing ring current could change in magnitude or sign.

What would settle it

Take the simulated trapped-particle distribution near the loop as a toroidal current density, solve Maxwell's equations for its magnetic-field perturbation on the Schwarzschild background, and compare the induced field at the loop with the original field. If the induced field is not opposite in sign, or is negligible in magnitude, the claimed screening ring current is not established. A complementary check is a particle-in-cell simulation with a fixed current loop and B≈0.1 to see whether accumulation and field reduction persist when back-reaction is active.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • With an attractive Lorentz force, charged particles ionized from a Keplerian disk accumulate near the current loop, forming toroidal structures analogous to radiation belts.
  • The accumulated particles' collective toroidal drift acts as a ring current that opposes and weakens the current loop's magnetic field.
  • No radiation-belt-like structure can form inside the charged-particle innermost stable circular orbit; the ISCO is a lower bound on belt location.
  • Off-equatorial stable trapping occurs only in the repulsive Lorentz configuration and only outside the loop radius, consistent with the dipole-field approximation there.
  • The idealized zero-width loop produces a divergent vector potential at the loop, so physically realistic models require a finite-width current distribution or a smooth approximating field.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If back-reaction of the trapped particles is included, the magnitude—or even sign—of the screening ring current could change; the paper's test-particle treatment does not settle this.
  • A finite-width loop combined with a self-consistent trapped-particle current might produce stable toroidal plasma pinches, offering an analytic starting point for particle-in-cell simulations of black-hole magnetospheres.
  • Because the accumulation mechanism is not unique to curved spacetime, the cleanest general-relativistic signature of the model is the ISCO boundary and the near-horizon stability windows, which could be searched for in accretion variability or quasi-periodic oscillations.
  • The screening of the loop's field by trapped particles could, over long times, alter the magnetic flux available to accretion or jet-launching dynamics in more complete plasma models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the electromagnetic field of an equatorial current loop around a Schwarzschild black hole using the exact vector potential (14), then analyzes the motion of charged test particles in this field. The authors classify the dynamics as attractive or repulsive according to the sign of the magnetic interaction parameter B = qI/m (42), study the effective potential Veff (44), compute circular-orbit stability and epicyclic frequencies, identify allowed regions that resemble radiation belts, and claim that in the attractive case charged particles accumulate near the loop and form a collective ring current opposing the original field. The field solution is cross-checked against the flat-spacetime limit (27), the uniform-field limit (28), and Petterson's multipole expansion (30).

Significance. If the central ring-current claim were established, the model would provide a valuable analytic setting for charged-particle trapping and diamagnetic screening around black holes, complementing GRMHD/GRPIC simulations. The strengths are the exact field solution, the careful validation against known limits, and the systematic stability/frequency analysis. However, the advertised collective-current result is inferred from single-particle trajectory colors, and no distribution function, current density, or back-reaction calculation is provided. The claim is therefore qualitative and conditional at present, and the manuscript needs substantial additional work to support it.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. IV, Figs. 15-16] The statement that 'their collective motion generates a ring current opposing the current loop' is not derived. The evidence shown is a color map of toroidal displacement along test-particle trajectories. No distribution function, no current density J^mu, no sum over particle species, and no perturbed field delta-B are computed. Since Veff in Eq. (44) is constructed from the unperturbed A_phi, the calculation also omits the back-reaction of accumulated charge/current on the trapping potential. A distribution-level or self-consistent calculation is needed before the strength and sign of the screening current can be claimed.
  2. [Sec. IV and Eq. (42)] There is a sign ambiguity in the 'opposing ring current' conclusion. The magnetic parameter B = qI/m (42) is the only combination that enters the equations of motion. A trajectory with B>0 and positive toroidal displacement could correspond to positive charges moving prograde or negative charges moving retrograde depending on the direction of the loop current. The colors in Figs. 15-16 track u^phi, not the physical current q n u^phi. The assertion that the particle current opposes the loop field requires fixing the sign of q and the loop-current orientation, which the text does not do.
  3. [Sec. IV, Fig. 16] There is an internal inconsistency in the current-direction claims. For weak repulsive Lorentz force (B = -0.01, -0.1) the text says the collective motion 'would produce a ring current aligned with the original current loop', while later in the same section and in the discussion of Fig. 16 it says 'charged particles ... attenuate the original magnetic field through their collective drift motion in all scenarios explored.' These statements cannot both be true. The sign convention and the cases to which each statement refers need to be clarified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eqs. (1) and (42)] The symbol B is used both for the ambient magnetic field magnitude in Eq. (1) and for the magnetic interaction parameter qI/m in Eq. (42). This is confusing and should be renamed (for example, using a calligraphic or subscripted symbol for one of them).
  2. [Sec. I] The introduction says 'The article is separated into three sections', but the paper actually contains five sections (I-V). Please correct.
  3. [Fig. 10 caption] The caption states loop positions r0 in {4, 6, 12}, but the plotted panels show r0 = 2.2, 6, and 12. The caption and the figure labels should be reconciled.
  4. [Sec. IV] The phrase 'both lower sub-figures we the particles toroidal motion' in the Fig. 14 caption is ungrammatical and should be rewritten.
  5. [Sec. II] There is a typo in 'Amp`ere-Maxwell law' (missing accent). More importantly, the theta-function branch-cut discussion would benefit from a brief physical explanation of why the potential is nonetheless smooth, as this is surprising to a reader encountering Eq. (14) for the first time.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the GR field solution is self-cited but independently validated, and particle-dynamics conclusions follow from the stated equations without fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The magnetic field is taken from Kofroň & Kotrlárik (2022), a self-cited exact solution, but the manuscript independently validates it against the flat-spacetime solution (Eq. 11), the uniform-field limit (Eq. 28), Petterson's multipole expansion (Eq. 30), and the dipole limit. The authors do not fit any parameter to a target result: the magnetic parameter B=qI/m is a free input, and the effective potential Veff (Eq. 44), circular-orbit angular momentum LC (Eq. 48), and stability frequencies (Eqs. 51-52) are derived from the standard covariant Lorentz/Hamilton equations. The classification into attractive (B>0) and repulsive (B<0) configurations follows from the sign of the Lorentz force in the given field, not from an ansatz. The radiation-belt/ring-current claim in Sec. IV is an extrapolation from single-particle trajectories and lacks a distribution-function or back-reaction calculation, but this is an evidentiary gap rather than a circular reduction: the conclusion is not identical to any input by construction, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. Self-citations to Refs. [13,21,24] are used for comparison and interpretation and are not load-bearing. The paper's own flagged limitation about the delta-function loop divergence (Sec. V) further supports that the claims are conditional and not forced by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on the Schwarzschild metric, the test-particle approximation, and an idealized infinitesimally thin current loop whose exact field is imported from prior work. The parameters B, r_0, L, and E are hand-chosen to explore the parameter space; they are not fitted to external data. The paper introduces no new physical entities beyond the standard electromagnetic field and a test particle.

free parameters (4)
  • magnetic interaction parameter B = qI/m = varied, e.g., +/-0.001, +/-0.01, +/-0.1, +/-1, +/-10
    Hand-chosen ratio of Lorentz to gravitational coupling; sign distinguishes attractive (B>0) and repulsive (B<0) configurations.
  • current loop radius r_0 = varied: 2.2, 4, 6, 12
    Location of the toroidal current in the equatorial plane; chosen to represent the loop above or below the neutral ISCO at r=6.
  • particle angular momentum L = varied, e.g., 1, 5, 7, 10, 12
    Specific axial angular momentum, conserved; chosen to probe different effective potential shapes.
  • particle energy E = varied, e.g., 0.75, 0.9, 0.92, 0.996
    Specific energy; bounds the allowed regions in radiation belt plots (Fig. 11).
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Schwarzschild metric describes the background spacetime
    The field and particle motion are computed in a non-rotating Schwarzschild BH spacetime (Eq. 2).
  • domain assumption The exact four-potential (14) from Kofroň and Kotlařík 2022 is the magnetic field of an equatorial toroidal current loop
    Used as the starting point; cross-checked against the flat limit, the uniform field limit, and Petterson's multipole expansion.
  • ad hoc to paper The current loop is infinitesimally thin (delta-function current)
    Produces the divergent vector potential at r=r_0; the paper acknowledges that a finite width is needed but does not implement it.
  • domain assumption Test-particle approximation: charged particles do not back-react on the electromagnetic field or spacetime
    The Lorentz equation (36) and Hamiltonian (37) treat the field as fixed; collective currents inferred from the ensemble ignore back-reaction.
  • domain assumption Thin Keplerian disk ionization model: neutral particles on circular geodesics are ionized with unchanged mechanical momenta
    Used in Sec. IV to set initial conditions for the ionized particle trajectories.
  • standard math Hamiltonian dynamics and the epicyclic frequency formalism are valid for charged particle motion
    Standard tool for describing charged particle motion in stationary axisymmetric spacetimes.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21251 in / 19133 out tokens · 203320 ms · 2026-08-04T16:46:50.501652+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a theoretical study of the magnetic field generated by a toroidal current loop situated in the equatorial plane of a non-rotating Schwarzschild black hole, based on the dynamics of charged particles. Using the exact general relativistic solution for the magnetic field, we analyze particle motion both analytically and numerically, identifying regions of stable and unstable orbits. In particular, we classify charged particle dynamics into attractive and repulsive Lorentz force configurations and show that in the attractive case, charged particles can accumulate near the current loop, forming collective currents that oppose the original current loop magnetic field. We demonstrate that charged particle accumulation can lead to the formation of toroidal structures analogous to radiation belts in the BH magnetosphere. We compare the curved spacetime solution to flat spacetime analogs and highlight general relativistic effects such as the existence of the innermost stable circular orbit for charged particles, which sets a lower bound for radiation belt formation. The divergence of the vector potential at the loop location in the idealized infinitesimal loop model is addressed, and we argue that a physically realistic model must consider a finite-width current distribution to avoid unphysical divergences in the effective potential.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.11518 by David Kofro\v{n}, Martin Kolo\v{s}.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Magnetic field lines generated by an electric current [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Contour of density for electromagnetic four-potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Multipole expansion of the magnetic field generated by current loop (black dot) in equatorial plane as obtained by [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Two examples of the effective potential as a function of coordinates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Effective potential for charged particle dynamic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Charged particle motion in BH magnetosphere above the current loop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Charged particle dynamic in BH magnetosphere below the current loop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Charged particle dynamic in BH magnetosphere close to the current loop [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Angular momentum for charged particle circular orbit as a function of radius [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Fundamental frequencies of charged particle oscillation on a circular orbit in the equatorial plane. We chose three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Positions and sizes of allowed regions (radiation belts) for charged particle dynamic in BH magnetosphere generated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Region of radially stable circular orbits, Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Regions admitting the existence of off–equatorial circular orbits exist only for repulsive Lorentz force [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Ionization of thin Keplerian accretion disks around Schwarzschild BH with magnetic current loop in equatorial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Visualization of the probability density distribution of charged particles originating from an ionized Keplerian disk, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Visualization of the probability density distribution of charged particle trajectories originating from an ionized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_16.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. QPO-Based Bayesian Constraints on Charged Particle Dynamics Around Magnetized Schwarzschild Black Holes

    gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper derives Bayesian constraints on magnetic field strength and dipole coupling in magnetized Schwarzschild black holes by fitting QPO frequencies from stellar-mass to supermassive systems within the relativisti...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 23 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    + 4rp(didj + ¯di ¯dj) + 1 # (14) with (neitherinorjare summation indices) ls = r−r p sin2(θ/2) sin2(θ/2) (15) lc = r−r p cos2(θ/2) cos2(θ/2) (16) ei = 1 2 (2r−r p) cosθ+ rp 2 −i q r(r−r p) sinθ ,(17) ej = 1 2 (2r−r p) cosθ− rp 2 −i q r(r−r p) sinθ ,(18) ri = rp 2 +i q r0(r0 −r p),(19) and di = ¯ei −r i , d j =e j + ¯ri , d=d i ¯di ,(20) m= di ¯di−dj ¯dj d...

  2. [2]

    Uniform magnetic field In the limitr 0 → ∞(while increasing the current with the distance), we get a homogeneous magnetic field. The four-vector potential for the uniform magnetic field with an asymptotic value of the strengthBand the field lines orthogonal to the BH’s equatorial plane in the Schwarzschild metric has the only non-zero component AU ϕ =B U ...

  3. [3]

    One could na ¨ ıvely expect to recover a magnetic field of the magnetic dipole AD ϕ =B D h ln 1− rp r + rp r 1 + rp 2r i r2 sin2 θ,(29) but it isnotthe case

    Dipole magnetic field In contrast to the previous case, it is not possible to proceed with the limitr 0 →0, for the four-potential (14) of the current loop, as already discussed in [20], since it is forbidden to lower the current loop under the BH horizon. One could na ¨ ıvely expect to recover a magnetic field of the magnetic dipole AD ϕ =B D h ln 1− rp ...

  4. [4]

    R. A. Daly, Black Hole Spin and Accretion Disk Mag- netic Field Strength Estimates for More Than 750 Active Galactic Nuclei and Multiple Galactic Black Holes, The Astrophysical Journal886, 37 (2019), arXiv:1905.11319 20 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Nakamura, K

    M. Nakamura, K. Asada, K. Hada, H. Pu, S. Noble, C. Tseng, K. Toma, M. Kino, H. Nagai, K. Takahashi, J.-C. Algaba, M. Orienti, K. Akiyama, A. Doi, G. Gio- vannini, M. Giroletti, M. Honma, S. Koyama, R. Lico, K. Niinuma, and F. Tazaki, Parabolic Jets from the Spin- ning Black Hole in M87, The Astrophysical Journal868, 146 (2018), arXiv:1810.09963 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    J. A. Petterson, Stationary axisymmetric electromag- netic fields around a rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2218 (1975)

    1975

  7. [7]

    D. M. Chitre and C. V. Vishveshwara, Electromagnetic field of a current loop around a Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D12, 1538 (1975)

    1975

  8. [8]

    I. G. Moss, Black holes with current loops revisited, Phys. Rev. D83, 124046 (2011), arXiv:1102.3022 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  9. [9]

    R. M. Wald, Black hole in a uniform magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D10, 1680 (1974)

    1974

  10. [10]

    R. D. Blandford and R. L. Znajek, Electromagnetic ex- traction of energy from Kerr black holes, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society179, 433 (1977)

    1977

  11. [11]

    Tchekhovskoy, R

    A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, and J. C. McKinney, Black Hole Spin and The Radio Loud/Quiet Dichotomy of Active Galactic Nuclei, The Astrophysical Journal 711, 50 (2010), arXiv:0911.2228 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  12. [12]

    Koloˇ s and A

    M. Koloˇ s and A. Janiuk, Simulations of black hole ac- cretion torus in various magnetic field configurations, inRAGtime 20-22: Workshops on black holes and neu- tron stars, edited by S. Hled ´ ık and Z. Stuchl ´ ık (2020) p. 153–164, arXiv:2004.07535 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  13. [13]

    Janiuk and B

    A. Janiuk and B. James, Magnetically arrested accretion disks launching structured jets in application to GRB and AGN engines, Astronomy and Astrophysics668, A66 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Parfrey, A

    K. Parfrey, A. Philippov, and B. Cerutti, First-Principles Plasma Simulations of Black-Hole Jet Launching, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 035101 (2019), arXiv:1810.03613 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Crinquand, B

    B. Crinquand, B. Cerutti, G. Dubus, K. Parfrey, and A. Philippov, Synthetic gamma-ray light curves of Kerr black hole magnetospheric activity from particle-in-cell simulations, Astronomy and Astrophysics650, A163 (2021), arXiv:2012.09733 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Koloˇ s, Z

    M. Koloˇ s, Z. Stuchl ´ ık, and A. Tursunov, Quasi- harmonic oscillatory motion of charged particles around a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in a uniform mag- netic field, Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 165009 (2015), arXiv:1506.06799 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  17. [17]

    Tursunov, Z

    A. Tursunov, Z. Stuchl ´ ık, M. Koloˇ s, N. Dadhich, and B. Ahmedov, Supermassive Black Holes as Possible Sources of Ultrahigh-energy Cosmic Rays, The Astro- physical Journal895, 14 (2020), arXiv:2004.07907 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    V. P. Frolov and A. A. Shoom, Motion of charged parti- cles near a weakly magnetized Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D82, 084034 (2010), arXiv:1008.2985 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  19. [19]

    H. E. J. Koskinen and E. K. J. Kilpua,Physics of Earth’s Radiation Belts; Theory and Observations(Springer Cham, 2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Koloˇ s, A

    M. Koloˇ s, A. Tursunov, and Z. Stuchl ´ ık, Radiative Pen- rose process: Energy gain by a single radiating charged particle in the ergosphere of rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D103, 024021 (2021), arXiv:2010.09481 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Kofroˇ n and P

    D. Kofroˇ n and P. Kotlaˇ r ´ ık, Debye superpotential for charged rings or circular currents around Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D106, 104022 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd Edition (Wiley, 1998)

    1998

  23. [23]

    Punsly,Black Hole Gravitohydromagnetics, Vol

    B. Punsly,Black Hole Gravitohydromagnetics, Vol. 355 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009) se- ries Title: Astrophysics and Space Science Library

    2009

  24. [24]

    J. Vrba, M. Koloˇ s, and Z. Stuchl ´ ık, Charged particles in dipole magnetosphere of neutron stars: epicyclic oscilla- tions in and off-equatorial plane, The European Physical Journal Plus140, 98 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    Koloˇ s, Magnetic field generated by current loop in flat spacetime, inRAGtime 17-19: Workshops on Black Holes and Neutron Stars(2017) pp

    M. Koloˇ s, Magnetic field generated by current loop in flat spacetime, inRAGtime 17-19: Workshops on Black Holes and Neutron Stars(2017) pp. 91–98

    2017

  26. [26]

    M. A. Abramowicz and P. C. Fragile, Foundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory, Living Reviews in Relativity16, 1 (2013), arXiv:1104.5499 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  27. [27]

    Koloˇ s, M

    M. Koloˇ s, M. Shahzadi, and A. Tursunov, Charged particle dynamics in parabolic magnetosphere around Schwarzschild black hole, European Physical Journal C 83, 323 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Stella and M

    L. Stella and M. Vietri, kHz Quasiperiodic Oscillations in Low-Mass X-Ray Binaries as Probes of General Relativ- ity in the Strong-Field Regime, Physical Review Letters 82, 17 (1999), astro-ph/9812124

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  29. [29]

    Tursunov, Z

    A. Tursunov, Z. Stuchl ´ ık, and M. Koloˇ s, Circular orbits and related quasi-harmonic oscillatory motion of charged particles around weakly magnetized rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D93, 084012 (2016), arXiv:1603.07264 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Koloˇ s, A

    M. Koloˇ s, A. Tursunov, and Z. Stuchl ´ ık, Possible sig- nature of the magnetic fields related to quasi-periodic oscillations observed in microquasars, European Physi- cal Journal C77, 860 (2017), arXiv:1707.02224 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  31. [31]

    P´ anis, M

    R. P´ anis, M. Koloˇ s, and Z. Stuchl ´ ık, Determi- nation of chaotic behaviour in time series gen- erated by charged particle motion around magne- tized Schwarzschild black holes, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1905.01186 (2019), arXiv:1905.01186 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1905

  32. [32]

    Kenzhebayeva, S

    S. Kenzhebayeva, S. Toktarbay, A. Tursunov, and M. Koloˇ s, Black hole in a combined magnetic field: Ionized accretion disks in the jetlike and looplike configurations, Phys. Rev. D109, 063005 (2024), arXiv:2402.16529 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Stuchl ´ ık and M

    Z. Stuchl ´ ık and M. Koloˇ s, Acceleration of the charged particles due to chaotic scattering in the combined black hole gravitational field and asymptotically uniform mag- netic field, European Physical Journal C76, 32 (2016), arXiv:1511.02936 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    Kop´ aˇ cek and V

    O. Kop´ aˇ cek and V. Karas, Near-horizon Structure of Escape Zones of Electrically Charged Particles around Weakly Magnetized Rotating Black Hole, The Astrophys- ical Journal853, 53 (2018), arXiv:1801.01576 [astro- ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Kop´ aˇ cek and V

    O. Kop´ aˇ cek and V. Karas, Near-horizon Structure of Escape Zones of Electrically Charged Particles around Weakly Magnetized Rotating Black Hole. II. Accelera- tion and Escape in the Oblique Magnetosphere, The As- trophysical Journal900, 119 (2020), arXiv:2008.04630 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Kozlowski, M

    M. Kozlowski, M. Jaroszynski, and M. A. Abramowicz, The analytic theory of fluid disks orbiting the Kerr black hole., Astronomy and Astrophysics63, 209 (1978). 21

    1978

  37. [37]

    Sapountzis and A

    K. Sapountzis and A. Janiuk, The MRI Imprint on the Short-GRB Jets, The Astrophysical Journal873, 12 (2019), arXiv:1802.02786 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Janiuk, B

    A. Janiuk, B. James, and I. Palit, Variability of Magnetically Dominated Jets from Accreting Black Holes, The Astrophysical Journal917, 102 (2021), arXiv:2105.13624 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Bransgrove, B

    A. Bransgrove, B. Ripperda, and A. Philippov, Magnetic Hair and Reconnection in Black Hole Magnetospheres, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 055101 (2021), arXiv:2109.14620 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Meringolo, F

    C. Meringolo, F. Camilloni, and L. Rezzolla, Electromag- netic Energy Extraction from Kerr Black Holes: Ab- Initio Calculations, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.08942 (2025), arXiv:2507.08942 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025