pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.05354 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-06 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Quasinormal modes of Kerr-Newman black holes: revisiting the Dudley-Finley approximation

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 08:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords quasinormal modesKerr-Newman black holesperturbation decouplingzero-damped modesnear-extremal limitgravitoelectromagnetic perturbationsblack hole quasinormal spectrum
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

The Dudley-Finley approximation reproduces Kerr-Newman quasinormal frequencies to within 10 percent real and 1 percent imaginary for low modes while mapping zero-damped regions near extremality.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests how well a decoupling trick works for the ringing frequencies of charged spinning black holes. The trick freezes one of the perturbation fields and solves for the other, avoiding the full coupled equations. For the modes with angular numbers two two zero, two two one, and three three zero the results stay close to the exact coupled calculation across most of the allowed spin and charge values. In the near-extremal corner of parameter space the approximation shows that some parts support only the long-lived zero-damped modes while neighboring parts also support damped modes, and it supplies exact expressions for the dividing curves. The work also follows how the modes with many overtones move through the complex frequency plane.

Core claim

In the Dudley-Finley approximation the decoupled equations yield quasinormal frequencies that agree with the full coupled gravitoelectromagnetic system to roughly 10 percent for the real part and 1 percent for the imaginary part when applied to the (2,2,0), (2,2,1) and (3,3,0) modes throughout the subextremal domain. The near-extremal regime divides into subregions that contain exclusively zero-damped modes and subregions that contain both zero-damped modes and modes with nonzero damping; analytic formulas locate the boundaries between these subregions. The zero-damped modes in the approximation are related to the near-horizon and photon-sphere modes of the complete theory, while the quadrup

What carries the argument

The Dudley-Finley approximation obtained by freezing one of the gravitational or electromagnetic perturbation fields to its background value, thereby decoupling the otherwise coupled system of equations.

Load-bearing premise

Freezing one perturbation field to its background value continues to represent the dynamics of the full coupled gravitoelectromagnetic system for all subextremal spins and charges.

What would settle it

A numerical computation of the full coupled system at a near-extremal spin-charge value lying inside one of the predicted subregions that reveals a different number of zero-damped modes than the number expected from the analytic boundary.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.05354 by Hector O. Silva, Sagnik Saha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Logarithmic absolute error between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Logarithmic absolute error between the quasinormal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Logarithmic absolute error between the quasinormal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: we show the variation of δ 2 and F 2 s over the ex￾tremal quarter circle, a 2 ext = 1 4 − q 2 ext, for s = −2 and (ℓ, m) = (2, 2) and (2, 1) in the top and bottom panels, respectively. In the former case, as we increase the value of aext, the functions δ 2 and F 2 −2 cross over to positive values at slightly different values of the spin. In the lat￾ter case, δ 2 and F 2 −2 remain negative for all values of… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison between the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Numerical evaluation of the logarithm of the radial continued fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Numerical evaluation of the logarithm of the radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Numerical evaluation of the logarithm of the radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Numerical evaluation of the logarithm of Leaver’s radial continued fraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Predictions of the matched-asymptotic expansion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Predictions of Eqs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Trajectories of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Trajectories of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. The real part of the quasinormal frequencies of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. The potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive study of the Kerr-Newman quasinormal mode spectrum in the Dudley-Finley approximation, where the linear gravitoelectromagnetic perturbations are decoupled by "freezing" either one of the fields to its background value. First, we reassess the accuracy of this approximation by comparing it to calculations that solve the coupled system of gravitoelectromagnetic perturbation equations across the subextremal spin-charge parameter space. We find that for the $(\ell,m,n) = (2,2,0)$, $(2,2,1)$, and $(3,3,0)$ modes, the agreement is typically within $10\%$ and $1\%$ for the real and imaginary parts of the frequencies, respectively. Next, we investigate the spectrum in the near-extremal limit, and study the family of long-lived ("zero-damped") gravitational modes. We find that the near-extremal parameter space consists of subregions containing either only zero-damped modes, or zero-damped modes alongside modes that retain nonzero damping. We derive analytic expressions for the boundaries between these regions. Moreover, we discuss the connection between the zero-damped and damped modes in the Dudley-Finley approximation and the "near-horizon/photon-sphere" modes of the full Kerr-Newman spectrum. Finally, we analyze the behavior of the quadrupolar gravitational modes with large overtone numbers $n$, and study their trajectories in the complex plane.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies quasinormal modes of Kerr-Newman black holes in the Dudley-Finley approximation, which decouples linear gravitoelectromagnetic perturbations by freezing one field to its background value. It first reassesses the approximation's accuracy by direct numerical comparison to solutions of the full coupled system for the (ℓ,m,n)=(2,2,0), (2,2,1), and (3,3,0) modes across the subextremal (a,Q) domain, reporting typical agreement within 10% for real parts and 1% for imaginary parts of the frequencies. The work then examines the near-extremal limit, identifies subregions containing only zero-damped modes or zero-damped modes together with damped modes, derives analytic expressions for the boundaries between these regions, discusses connections to near-horizon/photon-sphere modes of the full spectrum, and analyzes trajectories of quadrupolar gravitational modes at large overtone numbers n in the complex plane.

Significance. If the reported numerical agreement holds under more detailed scrutiny, the results would be useful for efficient computation of Kerr-Newman quasinormal modes and for mapping the near-extremal spectrum, including the distribution of long-lived zero-damped modes. The analytic boundary expressions constitute a concrete advance, and the direct comparison to the coupled system (rather than an untested decoupling assumption) strengthens the central validation. This could inform studies of charged rotating black holes in gravitational-wave astrophysics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the accuracy assessment states agreement 'typically within 10% and 1%' for real and imaginary parts but supplies no error bars, convergence tests, or explicit description of the numerical method used to solve the full coupled gravitoelectromagnetic system, leaving the central validation claim only partially substantiated.
  2. [Near-extremal analysis] Near-extremal analysis section: the analytic expressions for the boundaries separating regions with only zero-damped modes from those containing both zero-damped and damped modes are derived within the Dudley-Finley approximation; the manuscript should quantify how these boundaries may shift when the full coupled system is solved in the same near-extremal regime.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Numerical comparison] The manuscript would benefit from a brief table or figure summarizing the exact (a,Q) values at which the 10%/1% agreement levels were verified for the three quoted modes.
  2. [Methods] Clarify the precise implementation of 'freezing' one field in the Dudley-Finley decoupling (e.g., which field is held fixed and at what background value) when presenting the decoupled equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the accuracy assessment states agreement 'typically within 10% and 1%' for real and imaginary parts but supplies no error bars, convergence tests, or explicit description of the numerical method used to solve the full coupled gravitoelectromagnetic system, leaving the central validation claim only partially substantiated.

    Authors: We agree that the central validation would be strengthened by additional details. In the revised manuscript we will expand the methods section to include an explicit description of the numerical scheme used to solve the coupled gravitoelectromagnetic system, report convergence tests with respect to grid resolution and truncation order, and attach error bars (or estimated uncertainties) to the quoted agreement percentages. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Near-extremal analysis] Near-extremal analysis section: the analytic expressions for the boundaries separating regions with only zero-damped modes from those containing both zero-damped and damped modes are derived within the Dudley-Finley approximation; the manuscript should quantify how these boundaries may shift when the full coupled system is solved in the same near-extremal regime.

    Authors: The analytic boundary expressions are indeed obtained inside the Dudley-Finley approximation. While we have already compared the approximation against the coupled system for representative modes over the full subextremal domain, a systematic quantification of the boundary shifts in the near-extremal regime would require a separate, computationally intensive campaign of coupled-system calculations at high spin and charge. We regard this as a valuable direction for follow-up work rather than an extension that can be completed within the present study. In the revision we will add a short paragraph noting this limitation and the expected direction of any corrections. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper's core claims rest on direct numerical comparisons between the Dudley-Finley decoupled equations and independent solutions of the full coupled gravitoelectromagnetic system for specific (ℓ,m,n) modes across the subextremal domain, plus derivations of analytic boundary expressions performed entirely within the approximation. These steps do not reduce to self-defined quantities, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations; the accuracy assessment uses external full-system benchmarks rather than quantities constructed from the approximation itself. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external numerical validation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The study rests on standard assumptions of linear black-hole perturbation theory and the validity of the Dudley-Finley decoupling; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linear perturbation theory is sufficient to describe gravitoelectromagnetic excitations of the Kerr-Newman background.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the framework for both the approximation and the full coupled system.
  • domain assumption Freezing one field to its background value yields a useful decoupling of the perturbation equations.
    Central premise of the Dudley-Finley approximation being reassessed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5799 in / 1483 out tokens · 42200 ms · 2026-05-18T08:51:31.745982+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 25 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    [19] and are publicly available at [44]

    Numerical results:These were obtained in Ref. [19] and are publicly available at [44]. This data cor- responds to the( ℓ, m, n) = (2 , 2, 0)mode com- puted along the line a = q. The Schwarzschild and extremal limits correspond toa = q = 0and a=q= (2 √ 2)−1 ≈0.35, respectively

  2. [2]

    Re”) and imaginary (“Im

    Bayesian fitting formulas:These were presented in Ref. [21], and provide accurate fits for the (ℓ, m, n) = (2 , 2, 0),(2 , 2, 1), and(3 , 3, 0)modes computed over the spin-charge parameter space. WequantifytheaccuracyoftheDudley–Finleyequation through the logarithmic absolute error: ∆ωℓmn = log10 |ωDF ℓmn −ω KN ℓmn|,(16) betweengravitational, s = −2,quasi...

  3. [3]

    7, we show our results for the( ℓ, m) = (2, 2)mode with θ = 10 ◦

    In Fig. 7, we show our results for the( ℓ, m) = (2, 2)mode with θ = 10 ◦. Far from extremality (ϵ≳ 10−3), we identify only a single branch of quasinormal modes with|Im ω|> 0(left and middle panels). Closer to extremality (ϵ≲ 10−3), these modes transition into ZDMs, with|Im ω| → 0(right panel). For instance, whenϵ = 10−3, the ZDMs are localized atReω≈ 1.92...

  4. [4]

    eigenvalue repulsion

    We then repeat the same analysis for(ℓ, m) = (2, 1), with θ = 10◦. In this case, both ZDMs and DMs exist in the near-extremal limit. Forϵ = 10−6, the ZDMs are shown in Fig. 8 (bottom panel), while the 10 0.5 1.0 1.5 Re ω −1.0 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 Im ω (ℓ, m, ϵ, θ) = (2 , 2, 10−6, 60◦) −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 0.5 1.0 1.5 Re ω −1.0 −0.8 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 Im ω (ℓ, m, ϵ...

  5. [5]

    The branches that emerge at small values ofa ex- hibit a distinctive behavior: oscillatory along the 13 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Re ω −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 Im ω a = 0 .05 0.1 0.2 0.3 a = 0 .4 (2, 2, 10) Kerr Kerr–Newman 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Re ω −10 −8 −6 −4 −2 Im ω a = 0 .05 0.1 0.2 0.3 a = 0 .4 (2, 2, 20) Kerr Kerr–Newman 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Re ω −6 −5 −4 −3 ...

  6. [6]

    For the m > 0modes, the overall shape of the trajectory appears to be largely determined by the azimuthal index m, with the overtone numbern in- troducing only minor variations; compare the panels across the two rows in Fig. 14

  7. [7]

    intermediate asymptotic

    The m < 0modes seem to be more sensitive to the overtone number n; for instance, the spiraling be- havior of them = −1modes is significantly affected by the specific choice ofn. Note how the number of whirls increases as we go from overtone number n= 20ton= 30in the top row of Fig. 15. We now turn to an investigation of the validity of two expressions sho...

  8. [8]

    E. T. Newman, R. Couch, K. Chinnapared, A. Exton, A. Prakash, and R. Torrence, Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass, J. Math. Phys.6, 918 (1965)

  9. [9]

    P. O. Mazur, Proof of uniqueness of the kerr-newman black hole solution, J. Phys. A15, 3173 (1982)

  10. [10]

    Newman and R

    E. Newman and R. Penrose, An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients, J. Math. Phys. 3, 566 (1962)

  11. [11]

    Chandrasekhar, The Gravitational Perturbations of the Kerr Black Hole

    S. Chandrasekhar, The Gravitational Perturbations of the Kerr Black Hole. I. The Perturbations in the Quantities which Vanish in the Stationary State, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A358, 421 (1978)

  12. [12]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturba- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 1114 (1972)

  13. [13]

    S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations, Astrophys. J.185, 635 (1973)

  14. [14]

    Chandrasekhar, On the equations governing the per- turbations of the Reissner-Nordström black hole, Proc

    S. Chandrasekhar, On the equations governing the per- turbations of the Reissner-Nordström black hole, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A365, 453 (1979)

  15. [15]

    R. M. Wald, Construction of Metric and Vector Potential Perturbations of a Reissner-Nordström Black Hole, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A369, 67 (1979)

  16. [16]

    J. M. Bardeen and W. H. Press, Radiation fields in the Schwarzschild background, J. Math. Phys.14, 7 (1973)

  17. [17]

    P.Pani, E.Berti,andL.Gualtieri,Gravitoelectromagnetic Perturbations of Kerr-Newman Black Holes: Stability and Isospectrality in the Slow-Rotation Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 241103 (2013), arXiv:1304.1160 [gr-qc]

  18. [18]

    P. Pani, E. Berti, and L. Gualtieri, Scalar, Electromag- netic and Gravitational Perturbations of Kerr-Newman Black Holes in the Slow-Rotation Limit, Phys. Rev. D88, 064048 (2013), arXiv:1307.7315 [gr-qc]

  19. [19]

    J. L. Blázquez-Salcedo and F. S. Khoo, Quasinormal modes of slowly rotating Kerr-Newman black holes using the double series method, Phys. Rev. D107, 084031 (2023), arXiv:2212.00054 [gr-qc]

  20. [20]

    Z. Mark, H. Yang, A. Zimmerman, and Y. Chen, Quasinor- mal modes of weakly charged Kerr-Newman spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D91, 044025 (2015), arXiv:1409.5800 [gr-qc]

  21. [21]

    A. L. Dudley and J. D. Finley, Separation of Wave Equa- tions for Perturbations of General Type-D Space-Times, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1505 (1977)

  22. [22]

    A. L. Dudley and J. D. Finley, III, Covariant Perturbed Wave Equations in Arbitrary TypeD Backgrounds, J. Math. Phys.20, 311 (1979)

  23. [23]

    K. D. Kokkotas, Quasinormal modes of the Kerr-Newman black hole, Nuovo Cim. B108, 991 (1993)

  24. [24]

    Quasinormal modes of Kerr-Newman black holes: coupling of electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations

    E. Berti and K. D. Kokkotas, Quasinormal modes of Kerr-Newman black holes: Coupling of electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations, Phys. Rev. D71, 124008 (2005), arXiv:gr-qc/0502065

  25. [25]

    Damped and zero-damped quasinormal modes of charged, nearly extremal black holes

    A. Zimmerman and Z. Mark, Damped and zero-damped quasinormal modes of charged, nearly extremal black holes, Phys. Rev. D93, 044033 (2016), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 93, 089905 (2016)], arXiv:1512.02247 [gr-qc]

  26. [26]

    O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, and J. E. Santos, Linear Mode Stability of the Kerr-Newman Black Hole and Its Quasinormal Modes, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 151101 (2015), arXiv:1501.04625 [gr-qc]

  27. [27]

    O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, J. E. Santos, G. Carullo, W. Del Pozzo, and D. Laghi, Eigenvalue repulsions in the quasinormal spectra of the Kerr-Newman black hole, Phys. Rev. D105, 084044 (2022), arXiv:2109.13949 [gr-qc]

  28. [28]

    Carullo, D

    G. Carullo, D. Laghi, N. K. Johnson-McDaniel, W. Del Pozzo, O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, and J. E. Santos, Constraints on Kerr-Newman black holes from merger-ringdown gravitational-wave observations, Phys. Rev. D105, 062009 (2022), arXiv:2109.13961 [gr-qc]

  29. [29]

    O. J. C. Dias, M. Godazgar, and J. E. Santos, Eigen- value repulsions and quasinormal mode spectra of Kerr-Newman: an extended study, JHEP07, 076, arXiv:2205.13072 [gr-qc]

  30. [30]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

    E. Bertiet al., Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment (2025), arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

  31. [31]

    H. Yang, F. Zhang, A. Zimmerman, D. A. Nichols, E. Berti, and Y. Chen, Branching of quasinormal modes for nearly extremal Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D87, 041502 (2013), arXiv:1212.3271 [gr-qc]

  32. [32]

    H. Yang, A. Zimmerman, A. Zenginoğlu, F. Zhang, E. Berti, and Y. Chen, Quasinormal modes of nearly extremal Kerr spacetimes: spectrum bifurcation and power-law ringdown, Phys. Rev. D88, 044047 (2013), arXiv:1307.8086 [gr-qc]

  33. [33]

    Spectroscopy of Extremal (and Near-Extremal) Kerr Black Holes

    M. Casals and L. F. Longo Micchi, Spectroscopy of ex- tremal and near-extremal Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D 99, 084047 (2019), arXiv:1901.04586 [gr-qc]

  34. [34]

    Asymptotic quasinormal modes of Reissner-Nordstr\"om and Kerr black holes

    E. Berti and K. D. Kokkotas, Asymptotic quasinormal modes of Reissner-Nordstrom and Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D68, 044027 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0303029

  35. [35]

    Highly damped quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, K. D. Kokkotas, and H. Onozawa, Highly damped quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D68, 124018 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0307013

  36. [36]

    Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes (1985)

    S. Chandrasekhar,The mathematical theory of black holes (1985)

  37. [37]

    Giorgi, Electromagnetic-gravitational perturbations 18 of Kerr–Newman spacetime: The Teukolsky and Regge–Wheeler equations, J

    E. Giorgi, Electromagnetic-gravitational perturbations 18 of Kerr–Newman spacetime: The Teukolsky and Regge–Wheeler equations, J. Hyperbol. Diff. Equat.19, 1 (2022), arXiv:2002.07228 [math.AP]

  38. [38]

    J. F. Plebanski and M. Demianski, Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity, Annals Phys.98, 98 (1976)

  39. [39]

    H. O. Silva, J.-W. Kim, and M. V. S. Saketh, Kerr- Newman quasinormal modes and Seiberg-Witten theory, Phys. Rev. D111, 104021 (2025), arXiv:2502.17488 [gr- qc]

  40. [40]

    Casals and R

    M. Casals and R. T. da Costa, Hidden Spectral Symme- tries and Mode Stability of Subextremal Kerr(-de Sitter) Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys.394, 797 (2022), arXiv:2105.13329 [gr-qc]

  41. [41]

    Aminov, A

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi, and Y. Hatsuda, Black Hole Quasi- normal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory, Annales Henri Poincaré23, 1951 (2022), arXiv:2006.06111 [hep-th]

  42. [42]

    Hatsuda, An alternative to the Teukolsky equation, Gen

    Y. Hatsuda, An alternative to the Teukolsky equation, Gen. Rel. Grav.53, 93 (2021), arXiv:2007.07906 [gr-qc]

  43. [43]

    W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, Perturbations of a Rotating Black Hole. II. Dynamical Stability of the Kerr Metric, Astrophys. J.185, 649 (1973)

  44. [44]

    E. D. Fackerell and R. G. Crossman, Spin-weighted angu- lar spheroidal functions, Journal of Mathematical Physics 18, 1849 (1977)

  45. [45]

    Seidel, A Comment on the Eigenvalues of Spin Weighted Spheroidal Functions, Class

    E. Seidel, A Comment on the Eigenvalues of Spin Weighted Spheroidal Functions, Class. Quant. Grav.6, 1057 (1989)

  46. [46]

    Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin-weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and M. Casals, Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin-weighted spheroidal harmon- ics in four and higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. D73, 024013 (2006), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 73, 109902 (2006)], arXiv:gr-qc/0511111

  47. [47]

    E. W. Leaver, An analytic representation for the quasi- normal modes of Kerr black holes, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A402, 285 (1985)

  48. [48]

    Nollert, Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild black holes: The determination of quasinormal frequencies with very large imaginary parts, Phys

    H.-P. Nollert, Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild black holes: The determination of quasinormal frequencies with very large imaginary parts, Phys. Rev. D47, 5253 (1993)

  49. [49]

    D. E. Muller, A method for solving algebraic equations using an automatic computer, Math. Tables Aids Comput. 10, 208 (1956)

  50. [50]

    W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery,Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

  51. [51]

    https://pages.jh.edu/eberti2/ringdown

  52. [52]

    S. L. Detweiler, Resonant oscillations of a rapidly rotating black hole, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A352, 381 (1977)

  53. [53]

    Andersson and S

    N. Andersson and S. Linnæus, Quasinormal modes of a Schwarzschild black hole: Improved phase-integral treat- ment, Phys. Rev. D46, 4179 (1992)

  54. [54]

    An analytical computation of asymptotic Schwarzschild quasinormal frequencies

    L. Motl, An Analytical computation of asymptotic Schwarzschild quasinormal frequencies, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.6, 1135 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0212096

  55. [55]

    Asymptotic black hole quasinormal frequencies

    L. Motl and A. Neitzke, Asymptotic black hole quasinor- mal frequencies, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7, 307 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0301173

  56. [56]

    The asymptotic quasinormal mode spectrum of non-rotating black holes

    N. Andersson and C. J. Howls, The Asymptotic quasi- normal mode spectrum of nonrotating black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.21, 1623 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0307020

  57. [57]

    On the Classification of Asymptotic Quasinormal Frequencies for d-Dimensional Black Holes and Quantum Gravity

    J. Natário and R. Schiappa, On the classification of asymp- totic quasinormal frequencies for d-dimensional black holes and quantum gravity, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 8, 1001 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0411267

  58. [58]

    Quasinormal modes of nearly extreme Reissner-Nordstrom black holes

    N. Andersson and H. Onozawa, Quasinormal modes of nearly extreme Reissner-Nordstrom black holes, Phys. Rev. D54, 7470 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9607054

  59. [59]

    Analytic Study of Rotating Black-Hole Quasinormal Modes

    U. Keshet and S. Hod, Analytic study of rotating black- hole quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. D76, 061501 (2007), arXiv:0705.1179 [gr-qc]

  60. [60]

    Quasinormal Modes of Kerr Black Holes in Four and Higher Dimensions

    H.-c. Kao and D. Tomino, Quasinormal Modes of Kerr Black Holes in Four and Higher Dimensions, Phys. Rev. D77, 127503 (2008), arXiv:0801.4195 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    R. G. Daghigh, M. D. Green, and B. W. Mulligan, Asymp- totic Spectrum of Kerr Black Holes in the Small Angu- lar Momentum Limit, Phys. Rev. D83, 044001 (2011), arXiv:1009.4632 [gr-qc]

  62. [62]

    Highly Damped Quasinormal Modes of Kerr Black Holes: A Complete Numerical Investigation

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and S. Yoshida, Highly damped quasinormal modes of Kerr black holes: A Complete numerical investigation, Phys. Rev. D69, 124018 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0401052

  63. [63]

    Bohr's Correspondence Principle and The Area Spectrum of Quantum Black Holes

    S. Hod, Bohr’s correspondence principle and the area spectrum of quantum black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 4293 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9812002

  64. [64]

    Quasinormal Modes, the Area Spectrum, and Black Hole Entropy

    O. Dreyer, Quasinormal modes, the area spectrum, and black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 081301 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0211076

  65. [65]

    The physical interpretation of the spectrum of black hole quasinormal modes

    M. Maggiore, The Physical interpretation of the spectrum of black hole quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 141301 (2008), arXiv:0711.3145 [gr-qc]

  66. [66]

    G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen, and J. E. Santos, Extremal Kerr Black Holes as Amplifiers of New Physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 091402 (2023), arXiv:2303.07358 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    G. T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G. N. Remmen, and J. E. Santos, Sudden breakdown of effective field the- ory near cool Kerr-Newman black holes, JHEP05, 122, arXiv:2403.00051 [hep-th]

  68. [68]

    W. L. Boyce and J. E. Santos, EFT Corrections to Charged Black Hole Quasinormal Modes (2025), arXiv:2506.10074 [hep-th]