Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 56 references

Linear and nonlinear optical tuning with Sb$_2$S$_3$-based metasurfaces

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Sb2S3 metasurfaces exhibit high-contrast optical switching at telecom wavelengths, achieving 92% transmission modulation experimentally and 99% in a silicon-hybrid design with lower power.

desk verdict A decent linear-switching demonstration with a muddled energy comparison and an abstract that promises THG results the paper never reports. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.11881 v2 pith:TCEWEMB7 submitted 2025-10-13 physics.optics

Amin Zamani , Meibao Qin , Gabriel Sanderson , Lu Zhang , Sara Moujdi , Qiwei Miao , Ze Zheng , Mohammadhossein Momtazpour
show 6 more authors
Christopher J. Mellor Wending Zhang Ting Mei Zakaria Mansouri Lei Xu Mohsen Rahmani
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords tunablemetasurfacesopticalswitchingphasechangematerialsSb2S3magneticdipoleresonancetelecommunicationwavelengthsthird-harmonicgenerationhybridsiliconmetasurface
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper demonstrates that a simple Sb2S3 nanopillar metasurface supporting a broad magnetic dipole resonance can modulate light transmission by up to 92% at telecommunication wavelengths when the material is partially crystallised by a green laser. It further shows that adding a thin silicon overlayer creates sharper Fano-like resonances, enabling similar experimental modulation (about 90%) with nearly half the laser power, and a simulated modulation depth of 99% with only 3% crystallisation. Additionally, the metasurface's broad resonance tunability and the strong third-order nonlinearity of Sb2S3 are exploited to demonstrate tunable third-harmonic generation over a ~40 nm range. These results matter because they suggest that phase-change metasurfaces for telecom switching do not require high-Q, fabrication-sensitive designs, and that hybridising with silicon can reduce switching energy and boost nonlinear response.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is the magnetic dipole (MD) Mie resonance in Sb2S3 nanopillars, a low-Q mode that nevertheless provides strong near-field confinement and high sensitivity to the refractive index change induced by the amorphous-to-polycrystalline phase transition. In the hybrid design, a thin silicon layer on the nanopillars turns the broadband MD response into high-Q guided-mode resonances with asymmetric Fano lineshapes, which concentrate fields near the Sb2S3/Si interface and amplify the effect of even a small degree of crystallisation. Partial crystallisation is modelled by linear interpolation between the refractive indices of the amorphous and crystalline phases, which links the measu

What would settle it

Measure the actual spatial distribution of crystallinity (e.g., by Raman mapping or electron energy-loss spectroscopy) across the nanopillar volume after laser exposure; if the index profile is not a uniform linear mixture, the mechanistic claim about '3% crystallisation' causing the hybrid's high modulation would be incorrect, even though the switching still works.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the low-Q magnetic dipole Mie resonance in Sb2S3 nanopillars is sufficient to produce a large transmission change upon phase transition: the refractive index contrast of ~0.74 between amorphous and polycrystalline Sb2S3 shifts the resonance by up to ~150 nm, yielding measured modulation depths up to ~92% at 1560 nm. By depositing a 100-nm silicon layer on the metasurface, the design introduces high-Q guided-mode resonances with Fano lineshapes; these are highly sensitive to small index changes, so only ~3% crystallisation is needed in simulation to achieve a 99% transmission conversion, and experimentally the hybrid device reaches ~90% modulation at 1450 nm with

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that partial crystallisation of Sb2S3 can be treated as a homogeneous mixture with a refractive index linearly interpolated between the amorphous and crystalline phases, and that the crystallisation fractions (53% for the monolithic, 3% for the hybrid) are reliably read off from matching simulated spectra to measurements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because a low-Q magnetic dipole resonance already gives 92% modulation, fabrication tolerances are relaxed, making Sb2S3 metasurfaces easier to produce at scale.
  • The hybrid Sb2S3/Si design reduces the switching energy density from 7 kJ/cm² to 4.1 kJ/cm² while preserving high modulation depth, pointing toward lower-power all-optical switches.
  • The demonstrated partial-crystallisation control enables gradual, reconfigurable spectral tuning, not just binary switching.
  • The platform supports tunable third-harmonic generation, with a ~40 nm emission shift and a threefold enhancement in the hybrid configuration, suggesting a route to switchable nonlinear light sources.
  • The metasurface shows large incident-angle independence up to 50°, making it compatible with high-numerical-aperture optical systems.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the linear-interpolation model of partial crystallisation is accurate, the energy savings in the hybrid design arise directly from the enhanced sensitivity of high-Q modes; however, if real partial crystallisation is inhomogeneous, the stated crystallisation fractions may not be literally correct, even though the power comparison remains valid.
  • The silicon overlayer approach could be generalised to other high-index dielectrics (e.g., TiO2, GaAs) to tailor resonance Q-factors and operating wavelengths, potentially opening a broader family of hybrid PCM metasurfaces.
  • The combination of Sb2S3's low loss and the THG enhancement suggests that hybrid metasurfaces could serve as tunable nonlinear sources for integrated photonics, and a direct measurement of the nonlinear conversion efficiency versus crystallisation would test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports all-optical switching in Sb2S3 nanopillar metasurfaces, both in a monolithic form and with a deposited silicon overlayer. The monolithic structure is designed to support a magnetic-dipole resonance in the telecom band; laser-induced crystallisation redshifts the resonance, giving an experimental transmission modulation depth of ~92% at 1560 nm. A hybrid Sb2S3/Si structure is claimed to require only ~3% crystallisation for 99% simulated modulation depth and to achieve ~90% experimental modulation at 1450 nm with lower switching power (65 mW vs 110 mW). The abstract additionally claims tunable third-harmonic generation over ~40 nm and a threefold enhancement in the hybrid platform, although the main text contains no THG measurements. The paper concludes that the hybrid design offers a low-loss, CMOS-compatible route to high-contrast, partially non-volatile all-optical switching.

Significance. If the central switching claims are robust, the work demonstrates that a low-Q magnetic-dipole resonance, which is easy to fabricate and tolerant to imperfections, can provide high-contrast transmission modulation in the telecom band. The proposed hybridisation with a silicon overlayer is a conceptually simple route to increasing the resonance Q and reducing the required crystallisation fraction. The paper provides direct experimental transmission spectra and uses RCWA and COMSOL for simulations, which is a strength. However, the quantitative energy-saving mechanism rests on an unvalidated partial-crystallisation model, and the nonlinear claims in the abstract are not supported by data in the submitted text. The significance of the linear-switching result is real but currently overstated in places.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eq. (1)] The quoted energy-density values are numerically inconsistent with Eq. (1). For the monolithic case, the text states 110 mW, 100 µm beam radius, and an exposure of 100 ms, and gives 7 kJ cm^-2; substituting into Eq. (1) yields I(0)*t = 2P/(πw0^2)*t ≈ 70 J cm^-2 for w0 = 100 µm. The values 4.1 kJ cm^-2 (hybrid) and 3.8 kJ cm^-2 (threshold) are consistent with a 10 µm beam radius. Either the monolithic radius is a typo or the energy comparison must be recomputed. This is load-bearing for the 'nearly half switching energy' claim.
  2. [Section 2.2 and Supporting Information Eq. (S1)] The crystallisation fractions of 53% (monolithic) and 3% (hybrid) are not measured but inferred by matching simulated spectra computed with a linear interpolation between amorphous and crystalline Sb2S3 refractive indices. This linear effective-medium assumption is not validated, and no fitting residuals, confidence intervals, or independent characterisation (e.g., Raman, XRD, ellipsometry of the written spots) are provided. Since the claim that the hybrid needs only partial crystallisation and therefore less laser power is the central mechanistic explanation, this load-bearing premise is insufficiently supported.
  3. [Abstract vs. main text] The abstract claims experimental demonstration of tunable third-harmonic generation over a ~40 nm spectral range and a threefold enhancement in the hybrid Sb2S3-Si platform. The main text contains no THG results, no THG experimental setup, and no corresponding figures or tables. The nonlinear claims are either missing from the manuscript or must be removed from the abstract. As written, the manuscript does not support these claims.
  4. [General experimental characterisation] The claimed modulation depths of 92% (monolithic) and ~90% (hybrid) appear to be based on single transmission spectra. No error bars, repeated measurements, or device-to-device statistics are provided. Given that the quantitative comparison in Table 1 and the energy-saving claim depend on these numbers, a representative set of repeated measurements and uncertainty estimates is necessary.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 2c caption] The caption states 'resonances near 1300 and 1400 nm in amorphous' whereas the text says the amorphous resonance is at ~1400 nm. Please clarify whether there are two resonances or a typo.
  2. [Section 4.1] The silicon layer is deposited by PECVD; specify whether it is amorphous, polycrystalline, or crystalline silicon, and state the optical constants used in simulation. The ellipsometry in Figure 1a appears to be for crystalline silicon, which may differ from the PECVD film.
  3. [Equation (2)] Define T_absolute_max clearly. If it is the maximum transmission of the amorphous state only, that should be stated; if it is the overall maximum across both phases, the wording is ambiguous.
  4. [Reference 36] The title in ref. 36 reads 'Sb2S3 and Sb2S3' and should be 'Sb2S3 and Sb2Se3'.
  5. [Section 2.2] The hybrid design is discussed within Section 2.2 without a subsection heading. Adding a subsection (e.g., 2.3) would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Crystallisation fractions are simulation-fit outputs presented as achieved values, but the central modulation/energy measurements are independent; no load-bearing circularity.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2.1 (Eq. S1), Section 2.2, Section 2.3 / Figure 3a inset]
    "for simplicity, a linear interpolation between amorphous and crystalline states was used to estimate the refractive index for intermediate states of crystallisation (Equation S1 in Supporting Information). ... Simulations suggest that achieving this switching functionality requires approximately 53% crystallisation of the PCM. ... Inset: Transmission conversion achieved with 3% crystallisation. ... primarily because the hybrid structure requires only partial crystallisation of the PCM"

    The 53% and 3% crystallisation values are outputs of the same linear-interpolation model (Eq. S1): they are the x values that make simulated transmission spectra match measured spectra, not independently measured material fractions. These fitted x values are then quoted as 'achieved' crystallisation and used as the mechanistic explanation for the hybrid's lower switching power ('primarily because ... only partial crystallisation'). The measured 92% modulation and the 110 vs 65 mW power comparison are direct and remain independent, so this is a model-bound interpretation rather than a full circular derivation.

full rationale

The central experimental chain is self-contained: Sb2S3 and Si refractive indices come from spectroscopic ellipsometry; transmission spectra are measured directly; modulation depth is computed from measured T values via Eq. 2; laser powers and energy densities are separate measurements. No uniqueness theorem or load-bearing self-citation is invoked. The only mild circular element is the use of simulated spectra with Eq. S1's linear interpolation to assign crystallisation fractions (53% monolithic, 3% hybrid) and then use those fitted fractions to rationalise the energy saving. This does not make the modulation-depth or power claim definitionally forced; it only means the stated partial-crystallisation mechanism should be treated as model-dependent until confirmed by independent structural characterisation. The energy-density arithmetic also needs checking (the 7 kJ/cm2 number appears inconsistent with the stated 100 µm radius and Eq. 1), but that is a numerical/correctness concern, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on measured optical constants, standard electromagnetic simulation, and an assumed linear model for partial crystallisation. No entirely new physics or entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Metasurface geometry (radius, height, periodicity) = r = 325 nm, h = 300 nm, p = 900 nm
    Optimised to place the magnetic-dipole resonance in the telecom band via parametric simulation; no first-principles derivation of these values is given.
  • Silicon overlayer thickness = 100 nm
    Chosen by parametric simulation (Figure S4) to maximise hybrid modulation depth in the telecom range.
  • Intermediate crystallisation fraction f = f ≈ 0.53 (monolithic), f ≈ 0.03 (hybrid)
    Used with linear refractive-index interpolation (Equation S1) to reproduce measured transmission spectra; not directly measured.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Linear interpolation between amorphous and crystalline Sb2S3 permittivity for partial crystallisation states (Equation S1)
    The crystallisation fractions 53% and 3% are inferred from this model; no microstructural or X-ray validation is provided.
  • domain assumption Spectroscopic ellipsometry gives accurate refractive indices for Sb2S3 and Si in the telecom band
    The low-loss claim (k < 1e-4) and all simulated modulations depend on these measured optical constants.
  • standard math RCWA and FEM simulations accurately represent the fabricated structures
    Simulation and experiment agree in resonance position, but exact fabricated dimensions and material dispersion are inputs; SEM is shown but dimensional variation is not quantified.
  • domain assumption Laser exposure does not change the silicon layer's optical response
    Supported only for the 61-65 mW range in Figure 4b; the claimed insulation effect that lowers the Sb2S3 crystallisation threshold is inferred, not directly measured.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Linear and nonlinear optical tuning with Sb$_2$S$_3$-based metasurfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TCEWEMB7

@misc{pith2026251011881,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Linear and nonlinear optical tuning with Sb$_2$S$_3$-based metasurfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TCEWEMB7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.11881}
}
abstract

Here, we experimentally demonstrate the unique properties of Sb$_2$S$_3$ metasurfaces on monolithic and hybridised Sb$_2$S$_3$-Si platforms. Their advantages are particularly pronounced in the telecommunication spectral range, where both phases remain nearly lossless together with a large and stable refractive index contrast compared to other counterparts. The monolithic metasurface enables transmission modulation depths of up to 92\% and resonance shifts as large as $\sim$150~nm at the telecommunication wavelengths through laser-induced phase transitions from amorphous to $\sim$ 50\% polycrystalline states. Furthermore, we demonstrate that integrating a silicon overlayer introduces high-Q hybrid resonances with enhanced near-field confinement, enabling comparable modulation, experimentally, with nearly half the laser switching power required as compared to the monolithic structure. Beyond linear optical switching, the broad resonance tunability of the Sb$_2$S$_3$ metasurface, together with the strong third-order nonlinearity of these materials, provides a promising platform for tunable nonlinear light generation. By exciting the Sb$_2$S$_3$ metasurfaces with a fixed broadband pump, we experimentally demonstrate tunable third-harmonic generation emission over a $\sim$40~nm spectral range through phase-change transition. Such tunability provides a versatile route for integrating Sb$_2$S$_3$ with intrinsically highly nonlinear materials to enable the combination of large optical tunability and efficient nonlinear light generation. We have proven this concept via our hybrid Sb$_2$S$_3$-Si platform, which shows a threefold enhancement in tunable THG emission arising from the combined nonlinear responses of Sb$_2$S$_3$ and silicon, and benefiting from enhanced electromagnetic field confinement enabled by the metasurface's high-Q resonances.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Rise of Optical Switching,

    Bishop, D. J. Giles, C. R. and S. R. Das, “The Rise of Optical Switching,” Scientific American 284, no. 1 (2001): 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0101-882. Sasikala, V. and K. Chitra, “All Optical Switching and Associated Technologies: A Review,” Journal of Optics 47, no. 3 (2018): 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-018-0452-3

    work page doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0101-882 2001

  2. [3]

    A Review of Silicon‐Based Integrated Optical Switches,

    X. Chen, J. Lin, and K. Wang, “A Review of Silicon‐Based Integrated Optical Switches,” Laser & Photonics Reviews 17, no. 4 (2023): 2200571. https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.202200571

    work page doi:10.1002/lpor.202200571 2023

  3. [4]

    Silicon photonics for telecom and data- com applications,

    K. Asakawa, Y. Sugimoto, and S. Nakamura, “Silicon photonics for telecom and data- com applications,” Opto-Electronic Advances 3, no. 10 (2020): 200011-1. https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2020.200011

    arXiv 2020

  4. [5]

    All-Optical Switching in Silicon-on-Insulator Photonic Wire Nano–Cavities,

    Belotti, M. Galli, M. Gerace, D. Andreani, L. C. Guizzetti, G. Md Zain, A. R. Johnson, N. P. Sorel, M. and R. M. De La Rue, “All-Optical Switching in Silicon-on-Insulator Photonic Wire Nano–Cavities,” Optics Express 18, no. 2 (2010): 1450–1461. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.001450

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.18.001450 2010

  5. [6]

    Dual-channel optical switch, refractive index sensor and slow light device based on a graphene metasurface

    Jiang, Xinpeng, Dingbo Chen, Zhaojian Zhang, Jie Huang, Kui Wen, Jie He, and Junbo Yang. "Dual-channel optical switch, refractive index sensor and slow light device based on a graphene metasurface." Optics Express 28, no. 23 (2020): 34079-34092. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.412442

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.412442 2020

  6. [7]

    Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction,

    N. Yu, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, F. Aieta, J.-P. Tetienne, F. Capasso, and Z. Gaburro, “Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction,” Science 334, no. 6054 (2011): 333–337. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210713 14

    doi:10.1126/science.1210713 2011

  7. [8]

    Blazed binary subwavelength gratings with efficiencies larger than those of conventional échelette gratings,

    Lalanne, P. Astilean, S. Chavel, P. Cambril, E. Launois, H., “Blazed binary subwavelength gratings with efficiencies larger than those of conventional échelette gratings,” Optics Letters 23, no. 14 (1998): 1081–1083. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.23.001081

    doi:10.1364/ol.23.001081 1998

  8. [9]

    Ultrafast Plasmonic Optical Switching Structures and Devices,

    X. Zhang and J. Yang, “Ultrafast Plasmonic Optical Switching Structures and Devices,” Frontiers in Physics 7 (2019): 190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2019.00190

    arXiv 2019

Show all 56 references
  1. [10]

    Tunable Electro- and All-Optical Switch Based on Epsilon-Near-Zero Metasurface,

    Xie, Z. T. Wu, J. Fu, H. Y. and Q. Li, “Tunable Electro- and All-Optical Switch Based on Epsilon-Near-Zero Metasurface,” IEEE Photonics Journal 12, no. 4 (2020): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2020.3010284

    2020

  2. [11]

    All-Optical Ultrafast Polarization Switching with Nonlinear Plasmonic Metasurfaces,

    Wang, H. Hu, Z. Deng, J. Zhang, X. Chen, J. Li, K. and G. Li, “All-Optical Ultrafast Polarization Switching with Nonlinear Plasmonic Metasurfaces,” Science Advances 10, no. 8 (2024): eadk3882. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk3882

    2024 doi

  3. [12]

    Spin-Controlled Generation of a Complete Polarization Set with Randomly-Interleaved Plasmonic Metasurfaces,

    Im, S. Deng, Y. Bozhevolnyi, S. I. and F. Ding, “Spin-Controlled Generation of a Complete Polarization Set with Randomly-Interleaved Plasmonic Metasurfaces,” Opto- Electronic Advances 7, no. 8 (2024): 240076-1. https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2024.240076

    2024

  4. [13]

    Ultrafast All- Optical Switching with Magnetic Resonances in Nonlinear Dielectric Nanostructures,

    M. R. Shcherbakov, P. P. Vabishchevich, A. S. Shorokhov, et al., “Ultrafast All- Optical Switching with Magnetic Resonances in Nonlinear Dielectric Nanostructures,” Nano Letters 15, no. 10 (2015): 6985–6990. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02989

    2015 doi

  5. [14]

    Reversible Thermal Tuning of All‐Dielectric Metasurfaces,

    M. Rahmani, L. Xu, A. E. Miroshnichenko, et al., “Reversible Thermal Tuning of All‐Dielectric Metasurfaces,” Advanced Functional Materials 27, no. 31 (2017): 1700580. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201700580

    2017 doi

  6. [15]

    Metasurface with Nanostructured Ge₂Sb₂Te₅ as a Platform for Broadband-Operating Wavefront Switch,

    Choi, C. Lee, S.-Y. Mun, S.-E. Lee, G.-Y. Sung, J. Yun, H. Yang, J.-H. Kim, H.-O. Hwang, C.-Y. and B. Lee, “Metasurface with Nanostructured Ge₂Sb₂Te₅ as a Platform for Broadband-Operating Wavefront Switch,” Advanced Optical Materials 7, no. 12 (2019): 1900171. https://doi.org/...

    2019 doi

  7. [16]

    Electrically Tunable VO₂–Metal Metasurface for Mid-Infrared Switching, Limiting and Nonlinear Isolation,

    King, J. Wan, C. Park, T. J. Deshpande, S. Zhang, Z. Ramanathan, S. and M. A. Kats, “Electrically Tunable VO₂–Metal Metasurface for Mid-Infrared Switching, Limiting and Nonlinear Isolation,” Nature Photonics 18, no. 1 (2024): 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01324-8 15

    2024 doi

  8. [17]

    Reconfigurable Metasurfaces with Mechanical Actuations: Towards Flexible and Tunable Photonic Devices,

    Z. Guanxing, Z. Liu, W. Deng, and W. Zhu, “Reconfigurable Metasurfaces with Mechanical Actuations: Towards Flexible and Tunable Photonic Devices,” Journal of Optics 23, no. 1 (2020): 013001. https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/abcc52

    2020 doi

  9. [18]

    Electrically Programmable Solid- State Metasurfaces via Flash Localised Heating,

    K. Zangeneh Kamali, L. Xu, N. Gagrani, et al., “Electrically Programmable Solid- State Metasurfaces via Flash Localised Heating,” Light: Science & Applications 12, no. 1 (2023): 40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023-01078-6

    2023 doi

  10. [19]

    Temperature-Controlled Optical Switch Metasurface with Large Local Field Enhancement Based on FW-BIC,

    Wang, X. Wang, Q. Ren, H. Cai, J. Xin, Y. Lang, X. Xiao, Z. Lan, J. You, and W. E. I. Sha, “Temperature-Controlled Optical Switch Metasurface with Large Local Field Enhancement Based on FW-BIC,” Frontiers in Nanotechnology 5 (2023): 1112100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2023.1112100

    2023

  11. [20]

    Electrical Tuning of Phase-Change Antennas and Metasurfaces,

    Wang, Y. Landreman, P. Schoen, D. Okabe, K. Marshall, A. Celano, U. Wong, H.-S. P. Park, J. and M. L. Brongersma, “Electrical Tuning of Phase-Change Antennas and Metasurfaces,” Nature Nanotechnology 16, no. 6 (2021): 667–672. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00882-8

    2021 doi

  12. [21]

    Magnetic Tuning of Liquid Crystal Dielectric Metasurfaces,

    Y. V. Izdebskaya, Z. Yang, M. Liu, et al., “Magnetic Tuning of Liquid Crystal Dielectric Metasurfaces,” Nanophotonics 11, no. 17 (2022): 3895–3900. https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2022-0101

    2022 doi

  13. [22]

    Nanosecond Laser Switching of Phase‐Change Random Metasurfaces with Tunable ON‐State,

    M. Alvarez‐Alegria, J. Siegel, M. Garcia‐Pardo et al., “Nanosecond Laser Switching of Phase‐Change Random Metasurfaces with Tunable ON‐State,” Advanced Optical Materials 10, no. 3 (2022): 2101405. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202101405

    2022 doi

  14. [23]

    Polarization-Multiplexed Metasurface- Based Retroreflective and Specular Reflection Enabling High-Efficient Optical Switch,

    Li, H. Zou, X. Lu, C. Wang, and S.-S. Lee, “Polarization-Multiplexed Metasurface- Based Retroreflective and Specular Reflection Enabling High-Efficient Optical Switch,” in Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Opto-Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC) (2024): 1–3. https://d...

    2024

  15. [24]

    Design and Optimization of a Thermally Tunable Vanadium Dioxide-Based Metasurface Optical Switch for Mid-Infrared Applications,

    A. Parveen, A. Irshad, D. Tyagi, M. Alam, A. Kazim, F. Ahmad, K. Tao, and Z. Ouyang, “Design and Optimization of a Thermally Tunable Vanadium Dioxide-Based Metasurface Optical Switch for Mid-Infrared Applications,” Silicon (2025): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-025-03425-1 16

    2025 doi

  16. [25]

    MEMS technology in optical switching,

    Plander and M. Stepanovsky, “MEMS technology in optical switching,” in Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 14th International Scientific Conference on Informatics (2017): 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFORMATICS.2017.8327264

    2017

  17. [26]

    Reconfigurable Nanophotonic Cavities with Nonvolatile Response,

    J. Von Keitz, J. Feldmann, N. Gruhler, et al., “Reconfigurable Nanophotonic Cavities with Nonvolatile Response,” ACS Photonics 5, no. 11 (2018): 4644–4649. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.8b01127

    2018 doi

  18. [27]

    Phase-Change Materials for Non-Volatile Photonic Applications,

    M. Wuttig, H. Bhaskaran, and T. Taubner, “Phase-Change Materials for Non-Volatile Photonic Applications,” Nature Photonics 11, no. 8 (2017): 465–476. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.126

    2017 doi

  19. [28]

    Wavelength-Selective 2×2 Optical Switch Based on a Ge₂Sb₂Te₅-Assisted Microring,

    C. Zhang, M. Zhang, Y. Xie, et al., “Wavelength-Selective 2×2 Optical Switch Based on a Ge₂Sb₂Te₅-Assisted Microring,” Photonics Research 8, no. 7 (2020): 1171–1176. https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.393513

    2020 doi

  20. [29]

    Contra-Directional Switching Enabled by Si-GST Grating,

    H. Hu, H. Zhang, L. Zhou, et al., “Contra-Directional Switching Enabled by Si-GST Grating,” Optics Express 28, no. 2 (2020): 1574–1584. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.381502

    2020 doi

  21. [30]

    Linear Optical Switch Metasurface Composed of Cross-Shaped Nano-Block and Ge₂Sb₂Te₅ Film,

    Q. Zhu, S. Shi, J. Wang, Q. Fang, M. Li, and J. Dong, “Linear Optical Switch Metasurface Composed of Cross-Shaped Nano-Block and Ge₂Sb₂Te₅ Film,” Optics Communications 498 (2021): 127222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2021.127222

    2021

  22. [31]

    Multi‐Level Optical Switching by Amorphization in Single‐ and Multi‐Phase Change Material Structures,

    S. Wredh, Y. Wang, J. K. W. Yang, and R. E. Simpson, “Multi‐Level Optical Switching by Amorphization in Single‐ and Multi‐Phase Change Material Structures,” Advanced Optical Materials 12, no. 5 (2024): 2301835. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202301835

    2024 doi

  23. [32]

    All-Optical Switch and Logic Gates Based on Hybrid Silicon-Ge₂Sb₂Te₅ Metasurfaces,

    Zhang, Z. Yang, J. Bai, W. Han, Y. He, X. Huang, J. Chen, D. Xu, S. and W. Xie, “All-Optical Switch and Logic Gates Based on Hybrid Silicon-Ge₂Sb₂Te₅ Metasurfaces,” Applied Optics 58, no. 27 (2019): 7392–7396. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.58.007392

    2019 doi

  24. [33]

    Broadband Transparent Optical Phase Change Materials for High-Performance Nonvolatile Photonics,

    Y. Zhang, J. B. Chou, J. Li, et al., “Broadband Transparent Optical Phase Change Materials for High-Performance Nonvolatile Photonics,” Nature Communications 10, no. 1 (2019): 4279. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12196-4 17

    2019 doi

  25. [34]

    Silicon Waveguide Optical Switch with Embedded Phase Change Material,

    K. J. Miller, K. A. Hallman, R. F. Haglund Jr., and S. M. Weiss, “Silicon Waveguide Optical Switch with Embedded Phase Change Material,” Optics Express 25, no. 22 (2017): 26527–26536. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.026527

    2017 doi

  26. [35]

    Electrically Controllable Optical Switch Metasurface Based on Vanadium Dioxide,

    Y. Ma, H. Zhou, Y. Huang, et al., “Electrically Controllable Optical Switch Metasurface Based on Vanadium Dioxide,” Optics Letters 48, no. 15 (2023): 3885–3888. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.492350

    2023 doi

  27. [36]

    A New Family of Ultralow Loss Reversible Phase‐Change Materials for Photonic Integrated Circuits: Sb2S3 and Sb2S3,

    M. Delaney, I. Zeimpekis, D. Lawson, D. W. Hewak, and O. L. Muskens, “A New Family of Ultralow Loss Reversible Phase‐Change Materials for Photonic Integrated Circuits: Sb2S3 and Sb2S3,” Advanced Functional Materials 30, no. 36 (2020): 2002447. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202002447

    2020 doi

  28. [37]

    Enhanced Meta-Displays Using Advanced Phase-Change Materials,

    O. Hemmatyar, S. Abdollahramezani, I. Zeimpekis, et al., “Enhanced Meta-Displays Using Advanced Phase-Change Materials,” arXiv arXiv:2107.12159 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Non‐Volatile Optical Switch Element Enabled by Low‐Loss Phase Change Material,

    X. Yang, L. Lu, Y. Li, et al.,“Non‐Volatile Optical Switch Element Enabled by Low‐Loss Phase Change Material,” Advanced Functional Materials 33, no. 42 (2023): 2304601. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202304601

    2023 doi

  30. [39]

    Sb2S3-Based Optical Switch Exploiting the Brewster Angle Phenomenon,

    D. Pérez-Francés, G. Santos, J. Resl, M. Losurdo, Y. Gutiérrez, and F. Moreno, “Sb2S3-Based Optical Switch Exploiting the Brewster Angle Phenomenon,” Optical Materials Express 13, no. 12 (2023): 3677–3687. https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.502327

    2023 doi

  31. [40]

    Visible Metasurface Using an Sb2S3 Nanodisk Structure for Stretchable Color Application,

    H. Li, B. Long, T. Wang, F. Zhou, Y. Xu, and Z. Zhang, “Visible Metasurface Using an Sb2S3 Nanodisk Structure for Stretchable Color Application,” Optics Communications 554 (2024): 130205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2023.130205

    2024

  32. [41]

    Phase-Change Nonlocal Metasurfaces for Dynamic Wavefront Manipulation,

    T. Liu, D. Zhang, W. Liu, et al., “Phase-Change Nonlocal Metasurfaces for Dynamic Wavefront Manipulation,” Physical Review Applied 21, no. 4 (2024): 044004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.044004

    2024 doi

  33. [42]

    Non-volatile dynamically switchable color display via chalcogenide stepwise cavity resonators,

    K. Liu, Z. Lin, B. Han, M. Hong, and T. Cao, “Non-volatile dynamically switchable color display via chalcogenide stepwise cavity resonators,” Opto-Electronic Advances 7, no. 1 (2024): 230033-1. https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2024.230033 18

    2024

  34. [43]

    Visible-Band Chiroptical Meta-Devices with Phase-Change Adjusted Optical Chirality,

    Zhang, L. Gao, K. Lu, F. Xu, L. Rahmani, M. Sun, L. Gao, F. Zhang, W. and T. Mei, “Visible-Band Chiroptical Meta-Devices with Phase-Change Adjusted Optical Chirality,” Nano Letters 22, no. 18 (2022): 7628–7635. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.2c02739

    2022 doi

  35. [44]

    Intermediate Phase‐Change States with Improved Cycling Durability of Sb₂S₃ by Femtosecond Multi‐Pulse Laser Irradiation,

    Gao, K. Du, K. Tian, S. Wang, H. Zhang, L. Guo, Y. Luo, B. Zhang, W. and T. Mei, “Intermediate Phase‐Change States with Improved Cycling Durability of Sb₂S₃ by Femtosecond Multi‐Pulse Laser Irradiation,” Advanced Functional Materials 31, no. 35 (2021): 2103327. https://doi.org...

    2021 doi

  36. [45]

    Phase Change Material Enabled 2×2 Silicon Nonvolatile Optical Switch,

    X. Yang, M. S. Nisar, W. Yuan, et al., “Phase Change Material Enabled 2×2 Silicon Nonvolatile Optical Switch,” Optics Letters 46, no. 17 (2021): 4224–4227. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.435552

    2021 doi

  37. [46]

    A Review of Integrated Photonic Devices Using Sb₂Se₃,

    X. Chen, J. Lin, and K. Wang, “A Review of Integrated Photonic Devices Using Sb₂Se₃,” Advanced Physics Research 4, no. 1 (2025): 2400080. https://doi.org/10.1002/apxr.202400080

    2025 doi

  38. [47]

    Reconfigurable Free Form Silicon Photonics by Phase Change Waveguides,

    S. Gao, R. Haonan, P. Jingzhe, et al., “Reconfigurable Free Form Silicon Photonics by Phase Change Waveguides,” Advanced Optical Materials 13, no. 15 (2025): 2402997. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202402997

    2025 doi

  39. [48]

    Low-Loss Optical Switching Based on Phase- Change Material Sb₂Se₃ in a Micro-Ring Resonator,

    Q. Zhang, Q. Hong, and Z. Zhu, “Low-Loss Optical Switching Based on Phase- Change Material Sb₂Se₃ in a Micro-Ring Resonator,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2597, no. 1 (2023): 012020. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2597/1/012020

    2023 doi

  40. [49]

    Optimized Wideband and Compact Multifunctional Photonic Device Based on Sb2S3 Phase Change Material,

    S. Zhou, Z. Wang, J. Nong, et al., “Optimized Wideband and Compact Multifunctional Photonic Device Based on Sb2S3 Phase Change Material,” Optics Express 32, no. 6 (2024): 8506–8519. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.507769

    2024 doi

  41. [50]

    Magnetic Light,

    Kuznetsov, A. I. Miroshnichenko, A. E. Fu, Y. H. Zhang, J. and B. Luk’yanchuk, “Magnetic Light,” Scientific Reports 2, no. 1 (2012): 492. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00492

    2012 doi

  42. [51]

    Multipolar Nonlinear Nanophotonics,

    Smirnova, D. and Y. S. Kivshar, “Multipolar Nonlinear Nanophotonics,” Optica 3, no. 11 (2016): 1241–1255. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.001241 19

    2016 doi

  43. [52]

    Optically Resonant Dielectric Nanostructures,

    Kuznetsov, A. I. Miroshnichenko, A. E. Brongersma, M. L. Kivshar, Y. S. and B. Luk’yanchuk, “Optically Resonant Dielectric Nanostructures,” Science 354, no. 6314 (2016): aag2472. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2472

    2016 doi

  44. [53]

    Broadband Infrared Imaging Governed by Guided-Mode Resonance in Dielectric Metasurfaces,

    Z. Zheng, D. Smirnova, G. Sanderson, et al., “Broadband Infrared Imaging Governed by Guided-Mode Resonance in Dielectric Metasurfaces,” Light: Science & Applications 13, no. 1 (2024): 249. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-024-01535-w

    2024 doi

  45. [54]

    Boosting Second-Harmonic Generation in the LiNbO₃ Metasurface Using High-Q Guided Resonances and Bound States in the Continuum,

    Z. Zheng, L. Xu, L. Huang, et al., “Boosting Second-Harmonic Generation in the LiNbO₃ Metasurface Using High-Q Guided Resonances and Bound States in the Continuum,” Physical Review B 106, no. 12 (2022): 125411. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.125411

    2022 doi

  46. [55]

    Tuning and Switching Effects of Quasi-BIC States Combining Phase Change Materials with All-Dielectric Metasurfaces,

    A. Barreda, C. Zou, A. Sinelnik, et al., “Tuning and Switching Effects of Quasi-BIC States Combining Phase Change Materials with All-Dielectric Metasurfaces,” Optical Materials Express 12, no. 8 (2022): 3132–3142. https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.462695

    2022 doi

  47. [56]

    Third-Harmonic Generation and Imaging with Resonant Si Membrane Metasurface,

    Zheng, Z. Xu, L. Huang, L. Smirnova, D. Zangeneh Kamali, K. Yousefi, A. Deng, F. et al., “Third-Harmonic Generation and Imaging with Resonant Si Membrane Metasurface,” Opto-Electronic Advances 6, no. 8 (2023): 220174. https://doi.org/10.29026/oea.2023.220174

    2023

  48. [57]

    Analysis of Guided Resonances in Photonic Crystal Slabs,

    Fan, S. and J. D. Joannopoulos, “Analysis of Guided Resonances in Photonic Crystal Slabs,” Physical Review B 65, no. 23 (2002): 235112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.235112

    2002 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.