Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 92 references

The Impact of Renewable Energy Communities in the Italian Day-Ahead Electricity Market: A Scenario Analysis

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that Renewable Energy Communities in Italy, by simultaneously injecting solar power and removing demand through self-consumption, shift day-ahead market equilibrium quantities by between -0.19% and +1.16% depending on scen

desk verdict A transparent, well-built scenario study whose distinctive winter finding rests on an unvalidated heating assumption; worth refereeing, but treat the seasonal results as conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.13517 v3 pith:OB4RZUX2 submitted 2025-10-15 stat.AP

Maksym Koltunov , Filippo Beltrami , Luigi Grossi , Nicola Blasuttigh This is my paper · ORCID
classification stat.AP
keywords RenewableEnergyCommunitiesDay-aheadelectricitymarketSyntheticcounterfactualMerit-ordereffectSelf-consumptionPhotovoltaicScenarioanalysisItaly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper combines a database of Italian Renewable Energy Communities with an engineering model of hourly solar production and consumption to estimate, via a synthetic counterfactual, how REC deployment changes the Italian day-ahead electricity market equilibrium. It finds small but non-negligible effects: equilibrium quantities rise by up to 1.16% in business-as-usual spring conditions and fall by 0.19% in the January policy scenario. The mechanism is a dual shift: REC self-consumption removes demand from the market while REC injection adds supply, and the net effect depends on season, self-consumption rate, and deployment level. A sympathetic reader would care because it quantifies a systemic benefit—potential wholesale price reduction and reduced grid exchange—that is often asserted but rarely measured.

What carries the argument

The central object is the synthetic counterfactual market equilibrium. The authors reconstruct hourly day-ahead demand and supply curves from public bid data, then shift demand rightward by the volume RECs self-consume and supply leftward by the volume RECs inject, creating a no-REC baseline. The difference between the actual equilibrium and this counterfactual isolates the market impact. The engineering model that produces those hourly volumes—five prosumer categories, seven solar zones, three self-consumption rates—is the load-bearing input.

What would settle it

Compare the engineering model's January hourly self-consumption and injection profiles against smart-meter data from even a few dozen operational Italian RECs; if actual winter self-consumption does not rise relative to injections for public, commercial, and non-profit members, the negative January equilibrium effect should vanish. More directly, a metered January average self-consumption rate below the modeled 45-55% range would falsify the 'REC Winter Effect'.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the impact of RECs on the Italian day-ahead market is real but bounded, and that its sign flips seasonally. In most hours and scenarios, REC deployment increases equilibrium quantities during daylight because injected solar displaces more expensive generation; in cold months, particularly under the 5 GW policy scenario, electrified heating in public, SME, and non-profit buildings raises self-consumption so much that it offsets injections, slightly reducing traded volumes. The paper supports this with a two-stage method: bottom-up engineering profiles for five prosumer/producer categories across seven market zones, then a counterfactual that shifts the observed merit

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that public, SME, and non-profit REC members in Italy heat their buildings largely with electricity in winter; if most actually use gas heating, the winter self-consumption surge—and the negative January quantity effect—would weaken or disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At current deployment levels (business-as-usual and half-way scenarios), RECs raise day-ahead traded volumes during daylight in most months, with April weekday increases reaching up to 3%.
  • Under the full 5 GW policy target, RECs reduce traded volumes in January and stay near zero in other months, implying less energy bought through the wholesale market.
  • Higher self-consumption levels, toward 55% or with battery storage, deepen the reduction in equilibrium quantities, from about -0.19% to -0.3% on average.
  • Both positive and negative quantity effects imply downward pressure on wholesale prices, because REC injection displaces expensive generation and self-consumption lowers residual demand.
  • By reducing grid exchanges, REC proliferation can alleviate pressure on distribution infrastructure.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The winter effect depends heavily on the assumed electrification of heating in public, commercial, and non-profit buildings; if gas heating remains dominant in these sectors, the January quantity reduction could become a smaller positive effect, changing the policy narrative.
  • Because the model freezes non-REC renewable capacity and treats each market zone as closed, the reported percentages isolate the marginal REC effect; a growing non-REC solar fleet might crowd out some REC injection gains, making the estimates upper bounds in certain hours.
  • The same synthetic-counterfactual framework could be applied to other EU countries with virtual energy-community schemes, offering a direct test of whether the seasonal sign flip is specific to Italy's building stock and heating mix or a general feature of electrified demand.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper assesses the systemic impact of Renewable Energy Communities (RECs) on the Italian day-ahead electricity market by combining a bottom-up engineering model with a synthetic counterfactual market simulation. The authors first construct a database of 362 Italian RECs, derive representative prosumer categories (residential, public, SME, NPO, standalone PV), and generate hourly PV generation, self-consumption, and grid-injection profiles using PVGIS and nPro load profiles, scaled to 45–50–55% self-consumption targets across seven market zones. These profiles are then projected to three deployment scenarios for 2027 (Policy 5 GW, Half-way 1.47 GW, Business-as-usual 0.119 GW) plus two mixed scenarios. The projected REC injections and self-consumptions are used to shift the observed 2024 GME public bid supply and demand curves in the NORD and CSUD zones, producing counterfactual equilibria. The central quantitative claim is that REC deployment changes day-ahead equilibrium quantities by between -0.19% (January, Policy scenario) and +1.16% (April, BU scenario), with a pronounced 'REC Winter Effect' in which self-consumption dominates injections in cold months, especially in the 5 GW Policy scenario.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper offers a novel and replicable template for country-scale assessment of REC impacts on wholesale markets, combining a real-world REC mapping, public bid data, and a transparent synthetic counterfactual methodology. The publicly available REC database and the traceable use of GME public offers are strengths. The paper also contributes to the sparse empirical literature on REC–market interactions, which is policy-relevant given Italy's 5 GW REC target and the upcoming 2027 deadline. However, the significance is currently tempered by three limitations: only two of seven zones produce valid simulation outcomes; the headline seasonal result rests on an unvalidated electrified-heating assumption; and the claimed price-reduction effect is not quantified anywhere in the results.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2.1, footnote 21; Figure 12] The paper's most distinctive result—the negative January equilibrium-quantity impact and the 'REC Winter Effect'—is not an empirical measurement but a direct consequence of the modeling assumption that public (schools), SME (commercial), and NPO (office) prosumers use electric heating, while residential prosumers only have cooling. Footnote 21 states: 'all prosumers are assumed to own electrical loads related to heating, cooling, and general electricity demand, except for residential prosumers, for which only cooling has been considered.' No sensitivity analysis over heating technology is reported, and Table 4 shows that building types are known for only 43.7% of RECs and self-consumption levels for 22.7%. If a substantial share of Italian public/commercial buildings heat with gas, winter self-consumption would not dominate injections, and the negative January effect—as well as the narra
  2. [Abstract and Section 4.2] The title and abstract claim that REC deployment has 'a potential to reduce wholesale electricity prices,' and the Introduction frames the contribution as measuring the merit-order effect. However, the results report only percentage impacts on equilibrium quantities; no counterfactual price changes, price distributions, or price-related statistics are presented. Since the synthetic framework in Section 3.2 explicitly computes P^synt and P^actual, the price effect is available but never reported. The paper must either present the price impacts and their uncertainty or temper the abstract and conclusions; as written, the headline economic claim is unsupported by the presented evidence.
  3. [Section 4.2, first paragraph; Section 5, first paragraph] The paper states that results are reported 'exclusively for NORD and CSUD zones' because the algorithm 'did not retrieve valid outcomes for the remaining five zones, mainly due to data discontinuities and the low diffusion of RECs in such zones.' Yet the Discussion asserts that REC impacts are 'negligible or absent effects in the other five physical market zones.' This is an overstatement: absence of valid simulation outcomes is not evidence of negligible impact. The claim should be rephrased as an identified limitation, or the authors should provide at least partial evidence for the other zones (e.g., descriptive statistics or a diagnostic of why the algorithm failed). This is load-bearing for the country-scale policy conclusions.
  4. [Section 3.1.2, Eqs. (5)–(6) and load-scaling procedure] The self-consumption scenarios are constructed by vertically scaling nPro load profiles to hit 45/50/55% self-consumption targets, with no calibration to observed Italian consumption patterns beyond the nPro defaults. This means that the central relationship between self-consumption and injection—which drives the sign and magnitude of the equilibrium quantity effects—is, in part, an output of the load-scaling procedure rather than an empirically constrained input. The paper should provide a validation of the scaled load profiles against measured load data (e.g., aggregated zonal demand or smart-meter data) or, at minimum, a sensitivity analysis over alternative load-profile shapes and scaling methods. Without this, the quantitative range of [-0.19%, +1.16%] should be interpreted as conditional on the nPro load-shape assumption.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.1.1, Eqs. (1)–(2)] There is a duplicated introductory sentence: 'The first input parameter can be calculated via the following equation:' appears twice, and Eq. (1) uses inconsistent notation (pPas vs. P_PV). Please unify notation and remove the duplication.
  2. [Section 4.2, Figures 14–23] The smoothing procedure is described as 'selectively applied to positive values, while non-positive entries were left unchanged.' This asymmetric smoothing can bias the visual pattern toward positive excursions; please justify it and consider reporting unsmoothed distributions in an appendix.
  3. [Section 3.2] The closed-zone assumption (each market zone treated independently, ignoring inter-zonal flows) is stated but its implications for the NORD and CSUD results are not discussed. A brief paragraph acknowledging that the effects on zonal equilibrium quantities could be partially absorbed by cross-zonal trading would be helpful.
  4. [Section 4.1, Table 4] Table 4 reports data completeness, but the text does not explain how the missing data (e.g., self-consumption for 77.3% of RECs) are handled in deriving the 45–50–55% range and the building-type distributions. Please clarify whether the available subsample is assumed representative and discuss any selection bias.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the market-impact estimates follow from a transparent counterfactual simulation with exogenous bid data and stated engineering assumptions; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is a scenario simulation, not a circular prediction. The engineering stage uses PVGIS irradiation data and nPro load profiles, explicitly scaled to preset self-consumption targets (45%, 50%, 55%). These targets are inputs, calibrated to an observed average self-consumption level, and the paper clearly labels them as assumptions ("the load profiles were scaled to achieve three predefined self-consumption levels"). The market stage shifts observed GME bid curves by ΔQ_REC,d = E_self and ΔQ_REC,s = E_export, producing a counterfactual equilibrium. The resulting quantity impacts are therefore consequences of the stated assumptions and the exogenous bid data, not a re-import of the target output. The "REC Winter Effect" is explicitly traced to the engineering choice to add electrified heating to public, SME, and NPO load profiles (footnote 21: "all prosumers are assumed to own electrical loads related to heating, cooling, and general electricity demand, except for residential prosumers, for which only cooling has been considered"), so it is an assumption-driven result rather than a hidden circular step; its validity depends on whether that heating assumption holds, which is a robustness/correctness concern, not circularity. Self-citations (Koltunov et al., 2023; Koltunov and De Vidovich, 2025; Koltunov, 2025a,b) appear in the literature review and framing, but the core market simulation does not rest on any uniqueness theorem or ansatz imported from those works. The thin data coverage (e.g., building types for 43.7% of RECs, self-consumption for 22.7%) is a data-quality limitation, not evidence of circularity. Overall, the central claim has independent content and the derivation is self-contained given the clearly stated modeling assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central quantities are driven by self-consumption targets and scenario capacities chosen by the authors; no invented entities are introduced. The market counterfactual is standard, but the headline seasonal pattern is largely an output of load-profile assumptions.

free parameters (4)
  • self-consumption targets = 45%, 50%, 55% (central 50% based on observed average 49.1%)
    The engineering model scales nPro load profiles so that self-consumed energy equals the target share of PV production; the whole scenario grid and seasonal results depend on these targets (Section 3.1.2).
  • scenario total REC capacity = 5 GW (Policy), 1.47 GW (HW), 0.119 GW (BU)
    Chosen from the Italian 2027 policy target and extrapolations of 2024 deployment; capacity levels directly scale all market impacts (Table 3).
  • load scaling factor per prosumer category/zone/scenario = not reported
    A constant multiplier on nPro demand is iteratively tuned to hit the self-consumption ratio; its values are not given, so the resulting hourly injection profiles are not fully reproducible.
  • average PV capacity per prosumer category per zone = values in Figure 8 (e.g., public CNORD ~285.5 kW from small samples)
    Estimated from self-collected database with small zone-level samples; used to scale PVGIS yields and number of plants.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Observed DA bids with RECs already exclude self-consumption and include REC injections, so removing them is a pure horizontal shift of exogenous curves.
    This underpins the synthetic counterfactual in Section 3.2; strategic bidding responses are assumed away.
  • domain assumption Each market zone is a closed system with no inter-zonal flows.
    Explicitly assumed to justify zonal counterfactual; Section 3.2.
  • ad hoc to paper 2027 wholesale market conditions (bid curves, other RES capacity, demand) are identical to 2024.
    Stated in Section 3: 'we assume the wholesale market conditions in 2027 to be identical to those of 2024 for simplification purposes.'
  • domain assumption Non-residential prosumers (public, SME, NPO) have electrified heating and cooling loads from nPro default profiles.
    Drives the 'REC Winter Effect'; Section 4.2.1 and surrounding text.
  • domain assumption No battery storage is modeled; all non-self-consumed PV is injected.
    3.6% of RECs plan BESS; self-consumption scenarios up to 55% approximate storage, Section 3.1.2.
  • standard math Market equilibrium is given by intersection of aggregate demand/supply curves (uniform-price auction).
    Standard day-ahead market model used in the synthetic approach; Section 3.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Impact of Renewable Energy Communities in the Italian Day-Ahead Electricity Market: A Scenario Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OB4RZUX2

@misc{pith2026251013517,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Impact of Renewable Energy Communities in the Italian Day-Ahead Electricity Market: A Scenario Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OB4RZUX2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.13517}
}
read the original abstract

This paper evaluates the economic impact of Renewable Energy Communities (RECs) on the Italian wholesale power market. Combining a bottom-up engineering approach with a short-run economic impact assessment, the study begins by mapping existing and emerging RECs in Italy. We identify key characteristics of RECs, such as average installed capacity, institutional profiles of members, types of renewable systems used, and transmission across Italy's electricity market zones. This mapping yields representative REC configurations, which are employed within a bottom-up engineering model to generate energy injection and self-consumption profiles for different REC prosumer and producer categories (residential, public, small and medium enterprise, non-profit organization, and standalone installation), considering the different levels of solar irradiance in Italy based on latitude. These zonal results, aggregated on an hourly basis, inform the implementation of the synthetic counterfactual approach, which develops alternative scenarios (e.g., 5 GW target for REC-driven capacity set by Italian policy for 2027) to assess the impact of REC-driven injection and self-consumption on the Italian day-ahead power market. The findings suggest that REC deployment can increase equilibrium quantities during daylight in most of the time, while decreasing equilibrium quantities mostly during the cold months, as electrified heating drives greater self-consumption and offsets lower grid injections. Both positive and negative effects on equilibrium quantities suggest that REC deployment also has a potential to reduce wholesale electricity prices. Moreover, by reducing grid exchanges through higher self-consumption, REC proliferation can alleviate pressure on the distribution system.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.13517 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Economic benefit to members of RECs in Italy (excl. explicit capital subsidy). We apply an innovative mixed-model strategy in our study. In the first stage of analysis, we design a bottom-up engineering model that simulates the hourly behavior of various typical prosumers and pro￾ducers within a REC. Then, we project the model’s results onto several scenarios based on the actual REC deployment status in 2024 and the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Graphical representation of the prosumer energy modeling framework used to simulate hourly energy flows for different prosumer/producer categories. The flowchart illustrates the input data (PV production and load profiles), the modeling process for each prosumer/producer category (residential, school, commercial, office, standalone), and the generation of annual hourly datasets for energy production, self-consumptio… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows an example of the time profiles explained in the previous paragraphs for Milan (NORD). In particular, the annual hourly energy profiles for four different categories of prosumer users are presented. In each subplot, three key variables are shown over the full time horizon of one year. The yellow curve represents the electricity generated by the PV system, while the blue line indicates the hourly electricity co… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (22 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Graphical representation of the market equilibrium taking into account the effect of RECs. The curves Dactual and Sactual represent the actual demand and supply with RECs, leading to a market equilibrium at price P ractual and quantity Qactual. The dashed curves Dsynt …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows that most RECs are situated in the NORD market zone (63.8%) and the Central￾South zone (19.1%). In contrast, RECs are scarcely present in the rest of Italy. This deployment pattern may be associated with the general distribution of economic activity across the co…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of RECs across prosumer/producer categories represented by municipal buildings. Standalone systems are reported for 61 RECs, while rooftop in￾stallations owned by SMEs and residential prosumers are reported for 42 and 36 RECs, respectively. In contrast, on…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Average capacity shares of all categories of prosumers/producers across market zones, Sha p,z gle photovoltaic plant varies across market zones. For public and SME prosumers, the average capacity in the NORD and Central zones (CNORD, CSUD) is significantly higher than …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Average PV capacity per one Prosumer/Producer, P a.one p,z . Note: The number after the zone name indicates the sample size (REC observations). 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Building/installation types by prosumer/producer categories. Note 1: The numbers after building types indicate the number of individual buildings. Note 2: “Others” in the Public category include police stations, autodromes, waste management companies, cemeteries, publi…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Hourly impact on equilibrium quantities by RECs in the North market zone. in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Daily self-consumption rates for all prosumer categories in 12 months of the year [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison between NORD and CSUD: hourly percentage impact of RECs on equilibrium quantities, by assuming a homogeneous 45% self-consumption rate for all categories of prosumers. Month: January 2024. Scenario: sc45.2027 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Profile of average hourly impact on quantities by RECs in NORD for both actual and counter￾factual scenarios, assuming a homogeneous 45% self-consumption rate for all categories of prosumers. Periods: January and April 2024. Scenario: sc45.HW.2027. 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAG…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Percentage relative difference of average hourly impact on quantities from RECs in the NORD. The outcomes are disentangled by settlement period, and displayed by month for each designed scenario [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Percentage relative difference between actual and counterfactual average hourly quantities in the NORD for each month, by hour. Scenario: sc45.BU.2027 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Percentage relative difference between actual and counterfactual average hourly quantities in the NORD for each month, by hour. Scenario: sc45.HW.2027. 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Percentage relative difference between actual and counterfactual average hourly quantities in the NORD for each month, by hour. Scenario: sc45.2027. 30 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Percentage relative difference between actual and counterfactual average hourly quantities in NORD for each month during weekdays. Scenario: sc45.BU.2027. These latter findings carry important policy implications, particularly in light of the growing elec￾tricity dema…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Percentage relative difference between actual and counterfactual average hourly quantities in NORD for each month during weekends. Scenario: sc45.BU.2027. 5 Discussion, policy implications, and future research direc￾tions. Italy allocated €5.7 billion to support REC d…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Percentage relative difference between actual and counterfactual average hourly quantities in NORD for each month during weekdays. Scenario: sc45.HW.2027. their study is the scenario with low demand and excess RES generation. It leads to increased aggre￾gate demand du…
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Percentage relative difference between actual and counterfactual average hourly quantities in NORD for each month during weekends. Scenario: sc45.HW.2027 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Percentage relative difference between actual and counterfactual average hourly quantities in NORD for each month during weekdays. Scenario: sc45.2027. 34 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Percentage relative difference between actual and counterfactual average hourly quantities in NORD for each month during weekends. Scenario: sc45.2027. could also reduce the need for costly investments in grid infrastructure. This finding aligns with the conclusions b…
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Profile of average hourly quantities in NORD for both actual and counterfactual scenarios. Period: January 2024. Comparison between mixed scenarios: sc mix1.2027 vs. sc mix2.2027. enrich the discussions about policies for the REC deployment in a system-efficient welfa…
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Hourly percentage impact on equilibrium quantities by RECs: comparison between mixed scenar￾ios: sc mix1.2027 vs sc mix2.2027 for NORD. Period: January 2024. policy scenario due to the dominance of self-consumption patterns. Main factors behind this trend are the lowe…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , author Mcgregor, P

    author Allan, G. , author Mcgregor, P. , author Swales, K. , year 2011 . title The Importance of Revenue Sharing for the Local Economic Impacts of a Renewable Energy Project : A Social Accounting Matrix Approach . journal Regional Studies volume 45 , pages 1171--1186 . :10.1080/00343404.2010.497132

    arXiv 2011

  2. [2]

    title Testo integrato delle disposizioni dellautorita di regolazione per energia reti e ambiente per la regolazione dellautoconsumo diffuso

    author ARERA , year 2022 . title Testo integrato delle disposizioni dellautorita di regolazione per energia reti e ambiente per la regolazione dellautoconsumo diffuso . https://www.arera.it/fileadmin/allegati/docs/22/727-22TIAD.pdf

    2022

  3. [3]

    , author Zwickl-Bernhard, S

    author Backe, S. , author Zwickl-Bernhard, S. , author Schwabeneder, D. , author Auer, H. , author Korpås, M. , author Tomasgard, A. , year 2022 . title Impact of energy communities on the European electricity and heating system decarbonization pathway: Comparing local and global flexibility responses . journal Applied Energy volume 323 , pages 119470 . h...

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    , author Gotchev, B

    author Bauwens, T. , author Gotchev, B. , author Holstenkamp, L. , year 2016 . title What drives the development of community energy in Europe ? the case of wind power cooperatives . journal Energy Research and Social Science volume 13 , pages 136--147 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016, :10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.016 2016

  5. [5]

    , year 2024

    author Beltrami, F. , year 2024 . title The impact of hydroelectric storage in Northern Italy ’s power market . journal Energy Policy volume 191 , pages 114192 . :https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114192

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    , author Fontini, F

    author Beltrami, F. , author Fontini, F. , author Grossi, L. , year 2021 . title The value of carbon emission reduction induced by Renewable Energy Sources in the Italian power market . journal Ecological Economics volume 189 , pages 107149 . :10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107149

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    , author Jones, C

    author Bere, J. , author Jones, C. , author Jones, S. , year 2015 . title The economic and social impacts of small and community Hydro in Wales , pages 1--39 http://arxiv.org/abs/432412 arXiv:432412

    2015

  8. [8]

    , author Hernandez-Matheus, A

    author Berg, K. , author Hernandez-Matheus, A. , author Aragüés-Peñalba, M. , author Bullich-Massagué, E. , author Farahmand, H. , year 2024 . title Load configuration impact on energy community and distribution grid: Quantifying costs, emissions and grid exchange . journal Applied Energy volume 363 , pages 123060 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/a...

    arXiv 2024

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    , author Creamer, E

    author Berka, A.L. , author Creamer, E. , year 2018 . title Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda . journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews volume 82 , pages 3400--3419 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017...

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    , author Hesamzadeh, M.R

    author Biggar, D. , author Hesamzadeh, M.R. , year 2022 . title 8 - Energy communities: Challenges for regulators and policymakers , in: editor Löbbe, S. , editor Sioshansi, F. , editor Robinson, D. (Eds.), booktitle Energy Communities . publisher Academic Press , pp. pages 13...

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    , author Negri, S

    author Blasuttigh, N. , author Negri, S. , author Massi Pavan, A. , year 2025 . title Optimal ATECO -based clustering and photovoltaic system sizing for industrial users in renewable energy communities . journal Energies volume 18 , pages 763 . https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/1...

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    , author Goetz, R

    author Boccard, N. , author Goetz, R. , year 2025 . title Power Trading within an Energy Community : Applying a fair unequal sharing rule of photovoltaic energy . journal Energy Economics volume 150 , pages 108822 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014098832500649...

    2025

  5. [13]

    , year 2018

    author Brummer, V. , year 2018 . title Community energy – benefits and barriers: A comparative literature review of Community Energy in the UK , Germany and the USA , the benefits it provides for society and the barriers it faces . journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Revi...

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    , author Rognli, J

    author Brummer, V. , author Rognli, J. , author Gericke, N. , author Blazejewski, S. , year 2017 . title Conflict handling in Renewable Energy Cooperatives Organizational effects and member well-being , pages 1--18

    2017

  7. [15]

    , author Härtel, P

    author Böttger, D. , author Härtel, P. , year 2022 . title On wholesale electricity prices and market values in a carbon-neutral energy system . journal Energy Economics volume 106 , pages 105709 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140988321005600, :10.1016/j.enec...

    2022

  8. [16]

    title D.l

    author Camera dei deputati , year 2025 . title D.l. 45/2025: attuazione del pnrr e avvio dell’anno scolastico 2025/2026 -- documentazione parlamentare . https://temi.camera.it/leg19/provvedimento/decreto-legge-n-45-del-2025-attuazione-del-pnrr-e-avvio-dellanno-scolastico-2025-...

    2025

  9. [17]

    , author Ruggieri, G

    author Candelise, C. , author Ruggieri, G. , year 2017 . title Community Energy in Italy : Heterogeneous institutional characteristics and citizens engagement

    2017

  10. [18]

    , author Barchi, G

    author Casalicchio, V. , author Barchi, G. , author Calabria, F. , author Manzolini, G. , author Prina, M.G. , author Moser, D. , year 2025 . title Advancing renewable energy community planning through integrated sector-coupling and economies of scale . journal Applied Energy ...

    2025

  11. [19]

    , author Di Corato, L

    author Castellini, M. , author Di Corato, L. , author Moretto, M. , author Vergalli, S. , year 2021 . title Energy exchange among heterogeneous prosumers under price uncertainty . journal Energy Economics volume 104 , pages 105647 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/articl...

    2021

  12. [20]

    title Regulatory Aspects of Self-Consumption and Energy Communities

    author CEER , year 2019 . title Regulatory Aspects of Self-Consumption and Energy Communities . https://www.ceer.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/C18-CRM9_DS7-05-03_Report-on-Regulatory-Aspects-of-Self-Consumption-and-Energy-Communities_final.pdf

    2019

  13. [21]

    , author Gao, M

    author Chen, L. , author Gao, M. , year 2024 . title A novel model for rural household photovoltaic market trading: Utilizing cooperative alliances within a peer-to-peer framework . journal Journal of Environmental Management volume 370 , pages 122988 . https://www.sciencedire...

    2024

  14. [22]

    , author Tanaka, M

    author Chen, Y. , author Tanaka, M. , author Takashima, R. , year 2023 a. title Death spiral, transmission charges, and prosumers in the electricity market . journal Applied Energy volume 332 , pages 120488 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0306261922017457, :10....

    2023

  15. [23]

    , author Tanaka, M

    author Chen, Y. , author Tanaka, M. , author Takashima, R. , year 2023 b. title Recovering fixed costs in the presence of prosumers . journal International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems volume 154 , pages 109418 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S01...

    2023

  16. [24]

    , author Damoun, A

    author Ciarreta, A. , author Damoun, A. , author Espinosa, M.P. , year 2024 . title A synthetic bids simulation for power market deregulation . journal Energy Policy volume 192 , pages 114202

    2024

  17. [25]

    , author Espinosa, M.P

    author Ciarreta, A. , author Espinosa, M.P. , year 2010 . title Market power in the spanish electricity auction . journal Journal of Regulatory Economics volume 37 , pages 42--69

    2010

  18. [26]

    , author Montesano, G

    author Del Pizzo, A. , author Montesano, G. , author Papa, C. , author Artipoli, M. , author Di Napoli, M. , year 2022 . title 18 - Italian energy communities from a DSO 's perspective , in: editor Löbbe, S. , editor Sioshansi, F. , editor Robinson, D. (Eds.), booktitle Energy...

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    , author Ippolito, M.G

    author Di Silvestre, M.L. , author Ippolito, M.G. , author Sanseverino, E.R. , author Sciumè, G. , author Vasile, A. , year 2021 . title Energy self-consumers and renewable energy communities in Italy : New actors of the electric power systems . journal Renewable and Sustainab...

    2021

  20. [28]

    , author Li, J

    author Dong, J. , author Li, J. , year 2024 . title Incentivizing sustainable practices: Game-theoretic approach to peer-to-peer energy trading in the green transition era . journal Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks volume 39 , pages 101472 . https://www.sciencedirect.com...

    2024

  21. [29]

    , author Roberts, D

    author Entwistle, G. , author Roberts, D. , author Xu, Y. , year 2014 . title Measuring the Local Economic Impact of Community-Owned Energy Projects , pages 1--52

    2014

  22. [30]

    , author Pizarro-Irizar, C

    author Espinosa, M.P. , author Pizarro-Irizar, C. , year 2018 . title Is renewable energy a cost-effective mitigation resource? an application to the spanish electricity market . journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews volume 94 , pages 902--914

    2018

  23. [31]

    title Directive ( EU ) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources ( RED II )

    author European Union , year 2018 . title Directive ( EU ) 2018/2001 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources ( RED II ) . howpublished Official Journal of the European Union, L 328

    2018

  24. [32]

    title Directive ( EU ) 2019/944 on common rules for the internal market for electricity ( Recast )

    author European Union , year 2019 . title Directive ( EU ) 2019/944 on common rules for the internal market for electricity ( Recast ) . howpublished Official Journal of the European Union, L 158

    2019

  25. [33]

    , author Pinto, T

    author Faia, R. , author Pinto, T. , author Vale, Z. , author Corchado, J.M. , year 2021 . title Prosumer Community Portfolio Optimization via Aggregator : The Case of the Iberian Electricity Market and Portuguese Retail Market . journal Energies volume 14 , pages 3747 . https...

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    , author Pferschy, U

    author Frieß, N. , author Pferschy, U. , author Raese, D. , author Schauer, J. , year 2025 . title Assessing the potential of forecast-based optimization in renewable energy communities with flexible electricity, heat and mobility resources . journal Applied Energy volume 401 ...

    2025

  27. [35]

    , author Sauma, E

    author Fuentes González, F. , author Sauma, E. , author family=Weijde, given=A H, p.d.u. , year 2022 . title Community energy projects in the context of generation and transmission expansion planning . journal Energy Economics volume 108 . https://www.scopus.com/inward/record....

    2022

  28. [36]

    , author Rossetto, N

    author Glachant, J.M. , author Rossetto, N. , year 2021 . title New transactions in electricity: Peer-to-peer and peer-to- X . journal Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy volume 10 , pages 41--55 . https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85114436095&doi=10.5547

    2021

  29. [37]

    , author Fell, M.J

    author Hahnel, U.J.J. , author Fell, M.J. , year 2022 . title Pricing decisions in peer-to-peer and prosumer-centred electricity markets: Experimental analysis in Germany and the United Kingdom . journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews volume 162 . https://www.scopus....

    2022

  30. [38]

    , author Herberz, M

    author Hahnel, U.J.J. , author Herberz, M. , author Pena-Bello, A. , author Parra, D. , author Brosch, T. , year 2020 . title Becoming prosumer: Revealing trading preferences and decision-making strategies in peer-to-peer energy communities . journal Energy Policy volume 137 ....

    2020

  31. [39]

    , author Sáez, L

    author Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. , author Sáez, L. , author Allur, E. , author Morandeira, J. , year 2018 . title The emergence of renewable energy cooperatives in Spain : A review . journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews volume 94 , pages 1036--1043 . https://www.scop...

    2018

  32. [40]

    , author Born, P.H.S

    author Hochstetler, R.L. , author Born, P.H.S. , year 2022 . title 19 - Community energy design models in Brazil : From niches to mainstream , in: editor Löbbe, S. , editor Sioshansi, F. , editor Robinson, D. (Eds.), booktitle Energy Communities . publisher Academic Press , pp...

    2022 doi

  33. [41]

    , author Kahla, F

    author Holstenkamp, L. , author Kahla, F. , year 2016 . title What are community energy companies trying to accomplish? An empirical investigation of investment motives in the German case . journal Energy Policy volume 97 , pages 112--122 . https://www.scopus.com/inward/record...

    2016

  34. [42]

    title Co-operatives in Finland – What They Are Like and How They Operate

    author K.Huntala , year 2016 . title Co-operatives in Finland – What They Are Like and How They Operate

    2016

  35. [43]

    , year 2022

    author Kolesar, M. , year 2022 . title 7 - Energy communities: A North American perspective , in: editor Löbbe, S. , editor Sioshansi, F. , editor Robinson, D. (Eds.), booktitle Energy Communities . publisher Academic Press , pp. pages 107--130 . https://www.sciencedirect.com/...

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    , year 2025 a

    author Koltunov, M. , year 2025 a. title The economic impact of energy communities on the electricity system and its agents , in: booktitle Towards an Effective, Efficient, and Just Energy Transition . publisher EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste . https://www.openstarts.units...

    2025

  37. [45]

    , year 2025 b

    author Koltunov, M. , year 2025 b. title ENERGY COMMUNITIES : INSTITUTIONS , FINANCING , ECONOMICS . type Phd dissertation . address Trieste, Italy . https://arts.units.it/retrieve/10db9b8a-db7f-45f3-b01f-a182d1a40d49/DISSERTATION

    2025

  38. [46]

    , author Bisello, A

    author Koltunov, M. , author Bisello, A. , year 2021 . title Multiple Impacts of Energy Communities : Conceptualization Taxonomy and Assessment Examples , in: editor Bevilacqua, C. , editor Calabrò, F. , editor Della Spina, L. (Eds.), booktitle New Metropolitan Perspectives . ...

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    , author De Vidovich, L

    author Koltunov, M. , author De Vidovich, L. , year 2025 . title Energy communities in social sciences: A bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review . journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews volume 220 , pages 115871 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retri...

    2025

  40. [48]

    , author Pezzutto, S

    author Koltunov, M. , author Pezzutto, S. , author Bisello, A. , author Lettner, G. , author Hiesl, A. , author Van Sark, W. , author Louwen, A. , author Wilczynski, E. , year 2023 . title Mapping of Energy Communities in Europe : Status Quo and Review of Existing Classificati...

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    , author Oteman, M

    author Kooij, H.J. , author Oteman, M. , author Veenman, S. , author Sperling, K. , author Magnusson, D. , author Palm, J. , author Hvelplund, F. , year 2018 . title Between grassroots and treetops: Community power and institutional dependence in the renewable energy sector in...

    2018 doi

  42. [50]

    , author Tegen, S

    author Lantz, E. , author Tegen, S. , year 2011 . title Economic development impacts of community wind projects: A review and empirical evaluation . journal Community Wind Power Projects , pages 81--110

    2011

  43. [51]

    , author Candelise, C

    author Lupi, V. , author Candelise, C. , author Calull, M.A. , author Delvaux, S. , author Valkering, P. , author Hubert, W. , author Sciullo, A. , author Ivask, N. , author Van Der Waal, E. , author Iturriza, I.J. , author Paci, D. , author Della Valle, N. , author Koukoufiki...

    2021

  44. [52]

    , author Osti, G

    author Magnani, N. , author Osti, G. , year 2016 . title Does civil society matter? Challenges and strategies of grassroots initiatives in Italy 's energy transition . journal Energy Research and Social Science volume 13 , pages 148--157 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015...

    2016 doi

  45. [53]

    , author Bricca, D

    author Magni, G.U. , author Bricca, D. , author Familiari, S. , year 2025 . title Economic incentives for renewable energy communities: a scenario analysis in the transition process between the experimental and definitive italian policy framework . journal Journal of Sustainab...

    2025

  46. [54]

    , author Palm, J

    author Magnusson, D. , author Palm, J. , year 2019 . title Come together-the development of Swedish energy communities . journal Sustainability (Switzerland) volume 11 , pages 1--19 . :10.3390/su11041056

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    title Decreto cacer

    author MASE , year 2023 . title Decreto cacer . https://www.mase.gov.it/sites/default/files/Decreto

    2023

  48. [56]

    , author Antoniucci, V

    author Moroni, S. , author Antoniucci, V. , author Bisello, A. , year 2019 . title Local energy communities and distributed generation: Contrasting perspectives, and inevitable policy trade-offs, beyond the apparent global consensus . journal Sustainability (Switzerland) volum...

    2019

  49. [57]

    , author Maggio, G

    author Musolino, M. , author Maggio, G. , author D'Aleo, E. , author Nicita, A. , year 2023 . title Three case studies to explore relevant features of emerging renewable energy communities in italy . journal Renewable Energy volume 210 , pages 540--555 . https://linkinghub.els...

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    , author Blaise, A.L

    author Nieto-Martin, J. , author Blaise, A.L. , author Varga, L. , year 2019 . title Community energy retail tariffs in Singapore : Opportunities for peer-to-peer and time-of-use versus vertically integrated tariffs . journal Journal of Energy Markets volume 12 , pages 71--99 ...

    2019

  51. [59]

    , author Leva, S

    author Ogliari, E. , author Leva, S. , author Polenghi, M. , author De Ciechi, L. , year 2023 . title Comparative Performance analysis of different PV plants in Italy , in: booktitle 2023 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2023 IEEE Ind...

    2023

  52. [60]

    , author Lehtonen, O

    author Okkonen, L. , author Lehtonen, O. , year 2016 . title Socio-economic impacts of community wind power projects in Northern Scotland . journal Renewable Energy volume 85 , pages 826--833 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.047, :10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.047

    2016 doi

  53. [61]

    , author Sovacool, B.K

    author Parag, Y. , author Sovacool, B.K. , year 2016 . title Electricity market design for the prosumer era . journal Nature Energy volume 1 , pages 16032 . https://www.nature.com/articles/nenergy201632, :10.1038/nenergy.2016.32

    2016 doi

  54. [62]

    , author Roberts, D

    author Phimister, E. , author Roberts, D. , year 2012 . title The Role of Ownership in Determining the Rural Economic Benefits of Onshore Wind Farms . journal Journal of Agricultural Economics volume 63 . :10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00336.x

    2012

  55. [63]

    title Photovoltaic Geographical Information System

    author PVGIS , year 2022 . title Photovoltaic Geographical Information System . https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/photovoltaic-geographical-information-system-pvgis_en

    2022

  56. [64]

    , author Marzooghi, H

    author Riaz, S. , author Marzooghi, H. , author Verbic, G. , author Chapman, A.C. , author Hill, D.J. , year 2019 . title Generic Demand Model Considering the Impact of Prosumers for Future Grid Scenario Analysis . journal IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid volume 10 , pages 819-...

    2019

  57. [65]

    , author Arcos-Vargas, A

    author Robinson, D. , author Arcos-Vargas, A. , year 2023 . title Chapter 11 - Why efficient network pricing and energy markets really matter , in: editor Sioshansi, F. (Ed.), booktitle The Future of Decentralized Electricity Distribution Networks . publisher Elsevier , pp. pa...

    2023 doi

  58. [66]

    , author Del Guayo, given=Iñigo, p.u

    author Robinson, D. , author Del Guayo, given=Iñigo, p.u. , year 2022 . title 5 - Alignment of energy community incentives with electricity system benefits in Spain , in: editor Löbbe, S. , editor Sioshansi, F. , editor Robinson, D. (Eds.), booktitle Energy Communities . publi...

    2022 doi

  59. [67]

    , author Grossi, L

    author Rossetto, F. , author Grossi, L. , author Pollitt, M.G. , year 2019 . title Assessing Market Power in the Italian Electricity Market: A synthetic supply approach . publisher JSTOR

    2019

  60. [68]

    , author Verde, S.F

    author Rossetto, N. , author Verde, S.F. , author Bauwens, T. , year 2022 . title 1 - A taxonomy of energy communities in liberalized energy systems , in: editor Löbbe, S. , editor Sioshansi, F. , editor Robinson, D. (Eds.), booktitle Energy Communities . publisher Academic Pr...

    2022 doi

  61. [69]

    , author Deissenroth-Uhrig, M

    author Sarfarazi, S. , author Deissenroth-Uhrig, M. , author Bertsch, V. , year 2020 . title Aggregation of Households in Community Energy Systems : An Analysis from Actors ’ and Market Perspectives . journal Energies volume 13 , pages 5154 . https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/...

    2020 doi

  62. [70]

    , author Galliani, A

    author Schiavo, L.L. , author Galliani, A. , author Rossi, A. , year 2022 . title 6 - The “virtual” model for collective self-consumption in Italy , in: editor Löbbe, S. , editor Sioshansi, F. , editor Robinson, D. (Eds.), booktitle Energy Communities . publisher Academic Pres...

    2022 doi

  63. [71]

    , author Hufendiek, K

    author Schick, C. , author Hufendiek, K. , year 2023 . title Assessment of the regulatory framework in view of effectiveness and distributional effects in the context of small-scale PV — The German experience . journal Energy Policy volume 172 , pages 113310 . https://linkingh...

    2023

  64. [72]

    , author Klempp, N

    author Schick, C. , author Klempp, N. , author Hufendiek, K. , year 2021 . title Impact of Network Charge Design in an Energy System with Large Penetration of Renewables and High Prosumer Shares . journal Energies volume 14 , pages 6872 . https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/21/6...

    2021 doi

  65. [73]

    , author Klempp, N

    author Schick, C. , author Klempp, N. , author Hufendiek, K. , year 2022 . title Role and Impact of Prosumers in a Sector-Integrated Energy System With High Renewable Shares . journal IEEE Transactions on Power Systems volume 37 , pages 3286--3298 . https://ieeexplore.ieee.org...

    2022

  66. [74]

    , author Barchi, G

    author Secchi, M. , author Barchi, G. , author Macii, D. , author Moser, D. , author Petri, D. , year 2021 . title Multi-objective battery sizing optimisation for renewable energy communities with distribution-level constraints: A prosumer-driven perspective . journal Applied ...

    2021

  67. [75]

    , author Genoese, M

    author Sensfu , F. , author Genoese, M. , year 2006 . title Agent-based simulation for the German electricity markets-An analysis of the German spot market prices in the year 2001 . publisher na

    2006

  68. [76]

    , author Ragwitz, M

    author Sensfu , F. , author Ragwitz, M. , author Genoese, M. , year 2008 . title The merit-order effect: A detailed analysis of the price effect of renewable electricity generation on spot market prices in germany . journal Energy policy volume 36 , pages 3086--3094

    2008

  69. [77]

    , author Nelson, T

    author Simshauser, P. , author Nelson, T. , author Gilmore, J. , year 2023 . title Chapter 3 - The sunshine state: Cause and effects of mass rooftop solar PV take-up rates in Queensland , in: editor Sioshansi, F. (Ed.), booktitle The Future of Decentralized Electricity Distrib...

    2023 doi

  70. [78]

    , year 2019

    author Sioshansi, F. , year 2019 . title Introduction , in: editor Sioshansi, F. (Ed.), booktitle Consumer, Prosumer, Prosumager . publisher Academic Press , pp. pages xxxix--lxii . https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128168356099824, :https://doi.org/10.101...

    2019 doi

  71. [79]

    , author Parra, D

    author Soini, M.C. , author Parra, D. , author Patel, M.K. , year 2020 . title Impact of prosumer battery operation on the cost of power supply . journal Journal of Energy Storage volume 29 , pages 101323 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352152X19316354, :10.10...

    2020

  72. [80]

    , author Soares, T

    author Sousa, T. , author Soares, T. , author Pinson, P. , author Moret, F. , author Baroche, T. , author Sorin, E. , year 2019 . title Peer-to-peer and community-based markets: A comprehensive review . journal Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews volume 104 , pages 367--3...

    2019

  73. [81]

    , author Sharma, S

    author Thapar, S. , author Sharma, S. , author Verma, A. , year 2017 . title Local community as shareholders in clean energy projects: Innovative strategy for accelerating renewable energy deployment in India . journal Renewable Energy volume 101 , pages 873--885 . https://lin...

    2017 doi

  74. [82]

    , year 2006

    author Torgerson, M. , year 2006 . title Umatilla County ’s Economic Structure and the Economic Impacts of Wind Energy Development : An Input-Output Analysis . journal Energy

    2006

  75. [83]

    , year 2018

    author Tricarico, L. , year 2018 . title Community energy enterprises in the distributed energy geography: A review of issues and potential approaches . journal International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management volume 18 , pages 81--94 . https://www.scopus.co...

    2018

  76. [84]

    , author Lebakula, V

    author Tsybina, E. , author Lebakula, V. , author Grijalva, S. , author Kuruganti, T. , year 2023 . title The Effect of Prosumer Duality on Power Market : The Effect of Market Regulation , in: booktitle 2023 North American Power Symposium ( NAPS ) , publisher IEEE . pp. pages ...

    2023

  77. [85]

    , author Ba llo, A

    author Ventosa, M. , author Ba llo, A. , author Ramos, A. , author Rivier, M. , year 2005 . title Electricity market modeling trends . journal Energy policy volume 33 , pages 897--913

    2005

  78. [86]

    , author Sebi, C

    author Vernay, A.L. , author Sebi, C. , year 2020 . title Energy communities and their ecosystems: A comparison of France and the Netherlands . journal Technological Forecasting and Social Change volume 158 , pages 120123 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120123, :10.1...

    2020

  79. [87]

    , author Manzolini, G

    author Veronese, E. , author Manzolini, G. , author Barchi, G. , author Moser, D. , year 2024 . title The role of flexible demand to enhance the integration of utility-scale photovoltaic plants in future energy scenarios: An italian case study . journal Renewable Energy volume...

    2024

  80. [88]

    , author Devine-Wright, P

    author Walker, G. , author Devine-Wright, P. , author Hunter, S. , author High, H. , author Evans, B. , year 2010 . title Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy . journal Energy Policy :10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.055

    2010 doi

  81. [89]

    , year 2022

    author Williamson, R.B. , year 2022 . title 3 - Energy communities: A U . S . regulatory perspective , in: editor Löbbe, S. , editor Sioshansi, F. , editor Robinson, D. (Eds.), booktitle Energy Communities . publisher Academic Press , pp. pages 43--57 . https://www.sciencedire...

    2022 doi

  82. [90]

    , year 2014

    author Wirth, S. , year 2014 . title Communities matter: Institutional preconditions for community renewable energy . journal Energy Policy volume 70 , pages 236--246 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.021, :10.1016/j.enpol.2014.03.021

    2014 doi

  83. [91]

    , year 2023

    author Wirtz, M. , year 2023 . title nPro : A web-based planning tool for designing district energy systems and thermal networks . journal Energy volume 268 , pages 126575 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544222034624, :10.1016/j.energy.2022.126575

    2023

  84. [92]

    , author Salvalai, G

    author Zhu, Y. , author Salvalai, G. , author Zangheri, P. , year 2025 . title Italian renewable energy communities: status and prospect development analysis . journal Energy and Buildings volume 348 , pages 116404 . https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S03787788250113...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.