pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2510.13770 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-15 · ✦ hep-ph

Gauge-independent Gravitational Waves from Cogenesis in a B-L Conserving Universe

Wan-Zhe Feng , Jinzheng Li , Pran Nath , Zong-Huan Ye This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 07:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords baryogenesiscogenesisgravitational wavesphase transitiondark mattersphaleronsB-L symmetrydark sector
0
0 comments X

The pith

In a B-L conserving extension, equal and opposite lepton asymmetries in visible and hidden sectors are converted by sphalerons into baryon asymmetry at a dark first-order phase transition that also produces detectable gravitational waves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that CP violation from Yukawa couplings creates equal and opposite lepton asymmetries between the visible sector and a hidden sector carrying lepton number. Lepton number stays conserved separately in each sector, so sphaleron processes can turn part of the visible lepton asymmetry into baryon asymmetry around the temperature of the first-order phase transition. The authors compute the resulting stochastic gravitational wave spectrum with a gauge-independent bubble nucleation method that remains valid even when the universe supercools and the percolation temperature is far below the dark photon mass. Parameter scans identify regions where the same setup matches the observed baryon asymmetry and dark matter density while predicting gravitational wave signals accessible to pulsar timing arrays and future detectors.

Core claim

With CP violation induced by Yukawa couplings, equal and opposite lepton asymmetries are generated in the visible and hidden sectors. Subsequent evolution preserves lepton number separately in each sector, and sphaleron interactions partially convert the lepton asymmetry into baryon asymmetry near the temperature of the first-order phase transition. Stochastic gravitational wave background production is discussed for the first-order phase transition using a gauge-independent bubble nucleation dynamics which yields spectra also valid in the supercooled low-temperature regime with T_p/m_{A_x} << 1. A parameter-space scan identifies regions that simultaneously account for cogenesis of baryon as

What carries the argument

Gauge-independent bubble nucleation dynamics for the first-order phase transition in the U(1)_x dark sector, which computes the gravitational wave spectrum valid even in the supercooled regime where the percolation temperature is much smaller than the dark photon mass.

If this is right

  • Baryon asymmetry arises from partial sphaleron conversion of a visible-sector lepton asymmetry.
  • Dark matter density and baryon asymmetry are explained together in the same parameter space.
  • Stochastic gravitational wave signals fall within reach of NANOGrav, EPTA, PPTA and higher-frequency future detectors.
  • The gravitational wave spectrum calculation holds in supercooled regimes with T_p much less than m_{A_x}.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Measurements of the gravitational wave peak frequency could be used to infer the dark photon mass or the strength of the phase transition.
  • A confirmed gravitational wave signal in the predicted range would provide indirect evidence for the hidden-sector lepton asymmetry required by the cogenesis mechanism.
  • The framework suggests that maintaining B-L conservation is compatible with successful baryogenesis when lepton asymmetries are generated separately in two sectors.

Load-bearing premise

The model parameters can be chosen to make sphaleron conversion produce the observed baryon asymmetry while the same first-order phase transition simultaneously yields the dark matter density and detectable gravitational waves.

What would settle it

A null result for stochastic gravitational waves in the frequency bands predicted by the viable parameter regions that reproduce the observed baryon asymmetry and dark matter density would rule out the mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.13770 by Jinzheng Li, Pran Nath, Wan-Zhe Feng, Zong-Huan Ye.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Thermal evolution of YAx , YX, Ysym, Ysym′ for four benchmark models labeled by ϵ, gx, mAx as given in each of the four panels. The plots show the comoving number densities of asymmetric dark matter X, its symmetric component (Ysym = 2YX), and the dark photon Ax as functions of the universe temperature. Ysym′ denotes the symmetric abundance of the dark matter in the absence of dark matter asymmetry, i.e., … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left panel: gx versus the dark photon mass mAx . Right panel: gx versus the vacuum expectation value of the U(1)x Higgs field, vx. The shaded light-green regions in both panels indicate the parameter space of gx that yields sufficient secluded annihilation of the symmetric dark matter component, for dark photon masses in the range 20 MeV − 1 GeV. The kinetic mixing between U(1)x and the hypercharge gauge f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A display of effective bounce actions S G.D. eff defined in Eq. (3.4) in Landau gauge (ξ = 0), along with S0 and S0 + S1 with different choices of ξ. From left to right, the models are (*),(a), (b) and (c) where the models are defined in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Analysis of gravitational wave power spectra for models (*), (a), (b), and (c) defined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Upper left panel: Parameter scan within the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Exhibition of the dependence of the gravitational wave power spectrum for four [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Individual gravitational wave source contributions for two benchmark models (*) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left Panel: Ratio |S1/S0| at Tp across (gx, λx) with vx = 1 GeV. The phase￾transition-completed region satisfies |S1/S0| < 1, indicating that next-to-leading corrections remain subdominant to the leading bounce action. Right Panel: Correlation between gravitational wave spectra and |S1/S0| at vx = 1 GeV. Models yielding the largest gravitational wave peak amplitudes preferentially exhibit smaller |S1/S0|, … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left Panel: Exhibition of the parameter space in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plots of the gravitational wave power spectrum Ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

An analysis of baryogenesis and stochastic gravitational wave production is presented for an extension of the standard model where the dark sector consists of dark matter particles charged under a $U(1)_x$ gauge symmetry, while a subset of dark fields also carry lepton number but no $U(1)_x$ charge. We demonstrate that with CP violation induced by Yukawa couplings, equal and opposite lepton asymmetries are generated in the visible and hidden sectors. Subsequent evolution preserves lepton number separately in each sector, and sphaleron interactions partially convert the lepton asymmetry into baryon asymmetry near the temperature of the first-order phase transition. Further, we discuss stochastic gravitational wave background production for the first-order phase transition using a gauge-independent bubble nucleation dynamics which yields spectra also valid in the supercooled low-temperature regime with {$T_p/m_{A_x} \ll 1$} where $T_p$ is the percolation temperature and $m_{A_x}$ is the dark photon mass. A parameter-space scan identifies regions that simultaneously account for cogenesis of baryon asymmetry and dark matter and predict stochastic gravitational wave signals within reach of current (NANOGrav, EPTA, PPTA) and future detectors at higher frequencies, providing a unified framework for cogenesis and associated gravitational wave production.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes baryogenesis and stochastic gravitational wave production in an extension of the Standard Model featuring a dark sector with U(1)_x gauge symmetry. It demonstrates that CP violation from Yukawa couplings generates equal and opposite lepton asymmetries in visible and hidden sectors, with lepton number conserved separately in each. Sphaleron interactions convert part of the visible lepton asymmetry to baryon asymmetry near the first-order phase transition temperature. The paper computes the stochastic GW background using gauge-independent bubble nucleation dynamics valid in the supercooled regime where T_p / m_{A_x} << 1, and performs a parameter scan identifying regions that explain baryon asymmetry, dark matter density, and predict detectable GW signals for current and future detectors.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this work offers a unified framework for cogenesis of baryon asymmetry and dark matter alongside associated gravitational wave signals from the phase transition. The gauge-independent treatment of bubble nucleation provides a strength by extending validity to supercooled low-temperature regimes, which is a notable technical contribution. The parameter scan linking model parameters to observable GW spectra adds to the falsifiability of the scenario.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and parameter scan discussion] The claim that sphaleron interactions partially convert the lepton asymmetry into baryon asymmetry near the percolation temperature T_p relies on T_p remaining above the electroweak scale (~100 GeV) where sphalerons stay in equilibrium. The manuscript explicitly considers the supercooled regime with T_p/m_{A_x} << 1, which permits T_p well below this scale. No explicit verification is provided that the parameter scan enforces T_p ≳ 100 GeV for points simultaneously reproducing the observed baryon asymmetry, dark matter density, and a sufficiently strong first-order transition. This assumption is load-bearing for the cogenesis mechanism (see abstract and the discussion of sphaleron conversion).
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief explicit reference to the specific gauge-independent bubble nucleation formalism employed, to aid readers unfamiliar with recent developments in this technique.
  2. Notation for the dark photon mass m_{A_x} and percolation temperature T_p is clear in the abstract but should be consistently defined at first use in the main text with a dedicated equation or table entry.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. The concern raised about ensuring the percolation temperature remains above the electroweak scale for sphaleron conversion is well-taken. We address this below and will update the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and parameter scan discussion] The claim that sphaleron interactions partially convert the lepton asymmetry into baryon asymmetry near the percolation temperature T_p relies on T_p remaining above the electroweak scale (~100 GeV) where sphalerons stay in equilibrium. The manuscript explicitly considers the supercooled regime with T_p/m_{A_x} << 1, which permits T_p well below this scale. No explicit verification is provided that the parameter scan enforces T_p ≳ 100 GeV for points simultaneously reproducing the observed baryon asymmetry, dark matter density, and a sufficiently strong first-order transition. This assumption is load-bearing for the cogenesis mechanism (see abstract and the discussion of sphaleron conversion).

    Authors: We agree with the referee that this is a crucial point for the validity of the cogenesis mechanism. In our analysis, the parameter scan is performed such that the viable points have T_p above the electroweak scale to allow for sphaleron processes to be active near the percolation temperature. The supercooled condition T_p / m_{A_x} << 1 is satisfied by having a sufficiently large m_{A_x} relative to T_p, but T_p itself is kept above ~100 GeV by the choice of the dark sector potential parameters. To address the lack of explicit verification, we will add a dedicated discussion in the revised manuscript, including a statement that all scanned points satisfying the baryon asymmetry, dark matter relic density, and strong first-order transition criteria also fulfill T_p > 100 GeV. This can be verified by imposing an additional cut in the scan. We believe this clarification will resolve the concern without altering the main results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from model Lagrangian and standard processes

full rationale

The paper constructs lepton asymmetries from CP violation in Yukawa couplings, evolves them with separate lepton-number conservation per sector, applies sphaleron conversion near the PT temperature, and generates GW spectra from gauge-independent bubble nucleation valid for T_p/m_{A_x} << 1. These steps rely on explicit dynamics and external benchmarks rather than any self-definitional loop, fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The parameter scan selects viable points matching observed baryon asymmetry and DM density but leaves the GW output as an independent dynamical prediction, not a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The model relies on several domain assumptions typical of beyond-Standard-Model cosmology; without full text the exact number of fitted parameters is unknown but the abstract implies multiple scales and couplings are adjusted to fit observations.

free parameters (3)
  • Yukawa couplings
    Induce CP violation to generate lepton asymmetries; values chosen to produce observed baryon asymmetry
  • Dark photon mass m_Ax
    Sets the scale for the first-order phase transition and GW frequency spectrum
  • Percolation temperature Tp
    Adjusted relative to m_Ax to enter the supercooled regime Tp/m_Ax << 1
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Sphaleron interactions partially convert lepton asymmetry to baryon asymmetry near the phase transition temperature
    Invoked in the abstract to link visible sector lepton asymmetry to observed baryon asymmetry
  • domain assumption Lepton number is preserved separately in visible and hidden sectors after initial generation
    Allows equal and opposite asymmetries without violating total B-L
invented entities (2)
  • U(1)_x gauge symmetry no independent evidence
    purpose: Charges dark matter particles and enables first-order phase transition in dark sector
    New gauge symmetry postulated to separate dark matter from visible sector while allowing cogenesis
  • Dark photon A_x no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediator whose mass sets the phase transition scale and GW spectrum
    Postulated vector boson in the dark sector

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5766 in / 1696 out tokens · 93609 ms · 2026-05-18T07:01:30.775187+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 117 canonical work pages · 59 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.[LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Phys. Rev. Lett.116, no.6, 061102 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  2. [2]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazieet al.[NANOGrav], Astrophys. J. Lett.951, no.1, L8 (2023) doi:10.3847/2041- 8213/acdac6 [arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041- 2023

  3. [3]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array III. Search for gravitational wave signals

    J. Antoniadiset al.[EPTA and InPTA:], Astron. Astrophys.678, A50 (2023) doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 [arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346844 2023

  4. [4]

    D. J. Reardon, A. Zic, R. M. Shannon, G. B. Hobbs, M. Bailes, V. Di Marco, A. Kapur, A. F. Rogers, E. Thrane and J. Askew,et al.Astrophys. J. Lett.951, no.1, L6 (2023) doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02 [arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acdd02 2023

  5. [5]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Targeted Searches for Supermassive Black Hole Binaries

    N. Agarwal, G. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, A. M. Archibald, Z. Arzoumanian, J. G. Baier, P. T. Baker, B. Becsy, L. Blecha and A. Brazier,et al.[arXiv:2508.16534 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Zheng, C

    Q. Zheng, C. M. F. Mingarelli, W. DeRocco, J. Nay, K. K. Boddy and J. A. Dror, [arXiv:2508.21582 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    S. Y. Khlebnikov and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. D56, 653-660 (1997) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.653 [arXiv:hep-ph/9701423 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.56.653 1997

  8. [8]

    Gravitational Wave Production At The End Of Inflation

    R. Easther, J. T. Giblin, Jr. and E. A. Lim, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 221301 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.221301 [arXiv:astro-ph/0612294 [astro-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.221301 2007

  9. [9]

    A Gravitational Wave Background from Reheating after Hybrid Inflation

    J. Garcia-Bellido, D. G. Figueroa and A. Sastre, Phys. Rev. D77, 043517 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.043517 [arXiv:0707.0839 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.043517 2008

  10. [10]

    D. A. Kirzhnits, JETP Lett.15, 529-531 (1972)

    work page 1972

  11. [12]

    Witten, Nucl

    E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B177, 477-488 (1981) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90182-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90182-6 1981

  12. [13]

    A. H. Guth and E. J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D23, 876 (1981) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.876

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.876 1981

  13. [14]

    P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D25, 2074 (1982) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.2074

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.2074 2074

  14. [15]

    F. C. Adams, Phys. Rev. D48, 2800-2805 (1993) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.48.2800 [arXiv:hep-ph/9302321 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.48.2800 1993

  15. [16]

    R. R. Parwani, Phys. Rev. D45, 4695 (1992) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D48, 5965 (1993)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.4695 [arXiv:hep-ph/9204216 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.45.4695 1992

  16. [17]

    P. B. Arnold and O. Espinosa, Phys. Rev. D47, 3546 (1993) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D50, 6662 (1994)] doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.3546 [arXiv:hep-ph/9212235 [hep-ph]]. 34

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.3546 1993

  17. [18]

    J. R. Espinosa, M. Quiros and F. Zwirner, Phys. Lett. B314, 206-216 (1993) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90450-V [arXiv:hep-ph/9212248 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90450-v 1993

  18. [19]

    On Daisy and Superdaisy Resummation of the Effective Potential at Finite Temperature

    M. Quiros, [arXiv:hep-ph/9304284 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [20]

    Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions

    D. Curtin, P. Meade and H. Ramani, Eur. Phys. J. C78, no.9, 787 (2018) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6268-0 [arXiv:1612.00466 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6268-0 2018

  20. [21]

    J. R. Espinosa and M. Quiros, Phys. Rev. D76, 076004 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.076004 [arXiv:hep-ph/0701145 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.076004 2007

  21. [22]

    J. R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin, J. M. No and M. Quiros, Phys. Rev. D78, 123528 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.123528 [arXiv:0809.3215 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.123528 2008

  22. [23]

    CP in the dark

    D. Azevedo, P. M. Ferreira, M. M. Muhlleitner, S. Patel, R. Santos and J. Wittbrodt, JHEP11, 091 (2018) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2018)091 [arXiv:1807.10322 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2018)091 2018

  23. [24]

    Mohamadnejad, JHEP03, 188 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)188 [arXiv:2111.04342 [hep-ph]]

    A. Mohamadnejad, JHEP03, 188 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)188 [arXiv:2111.04342 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2022)188 2022

  24. [25]

    Biermann, M

    L. Biermann, M. M¨ uhlleitner and J. M¨ uller, Eur. Phys. J. C83, no.5, 439 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11612-w [arXiv:2204.13425 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11612-w 2023

  25. [26]

    W. Wang, W. L. Xu and J. M. Yang, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, no.9, 781 (2023) doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04412-4 [arXiv:2209.11408 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04412-4 2023

  26. [27]

    Limiting First Order Phase Transitions in Dark Gauge Sectors from Gravitational Waves experiments

    A. Addazi, Mod. Phys. Lett. A32, no.08, 1750049 (2017) doi:10.1142/S0217732317500493 [arXiv:1607.08057 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217732317500493 2017

  27. [28]

    Y. Zhu, J. Liu, R. Qin and L. Bian, Phys. Rev. D112, no.1, 015018 (2025) doi:10.1103/f4gr-hycg [arXiv:2503.19566 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/f4gr-hycg 2025

  28. [29]

    M. Aoki, H. Goto and J. Kubo, Phys. Rev. D96, no.7, 075045 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.075045 [arXiv:1709.07572 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.075045 2017

  29. [30]

    Pasechnik, M

    R. Pasechnik, M. Reichert, F. Sannino and Z. W. Wang, JHEP02, 159 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)159 [arXiv:2309.16755 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2024)159 2024

  30. [31]

    Gravitational Waves From a Dark (Twin) Phase Transition

    P. Schwaller, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, no.18, 181101 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.181101 [arXiv:1504.07263 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.181101 2015

  31. [32]

    Gravitational waves from dark first order phase transitions and dark photons

    A. Addazi and A. Marciano, Chin. Phys. C42, no.2, 023107 (2018) doi:10.1088/1674- 1137/42/2/023107 [arXiv:1703.03248 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1674- 2018

  32. [33]

    Fairbairn, E

    M. Fairbairn, E. Hardy and A. Wickens, JHEP07, 044 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2019)044 [arXiv:1901.11038 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2019)044 2019

  33. [34]

    R. T. Co, K. Harigaya and A. Pierce, JHEP12, 099 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)099 [arXiv:2104.02077 [hep-ph]]. 35

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2021)099 2021

  34. [35]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta and S. K. Kang, Phys. Rev. D104, no.6, 063501 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.063501 [arXiv:2105.01007 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.063501 2021

  35. [36]

    Abe and K

    T. Abe and K. Hashino, PTEP2024, no.6, 063B02 (2024) doi:10.1093/ptep/ptae087 [arXiv:2302.13510 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptae087 2024

  36. [37]

    Two-field cosmological phase transitions and gravitational waves in the singlet Majoron model

    B. Imtiaz, Y. F. Cai and Y. Wan, Eur. Phys. J. C79, no.1, 25 (2019) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6532-y [arXiv:1804.05835 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6532-y 2019

  37. [38]

    A. Paul, U. Mukhopadhyay and D. Majumdar, JHEP05, 223 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)223 [arXiv:2010.03439 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2021)223 2021

  38. [39]

    Dark, Cold, and Noisy: Constraining Secluded Hidden Sectors with Gravitational Waves

    M. Breitbach, J. Kopp, E. Madge, T. Opferkuch and P. Schwaller, JCAP07, 007 (2019) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/007 [arXiv:1811.11175 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/007 2019

  39. [41]

    Freese and M

    K. Freese and M. W. Winkler, Phys. Rev. D106, no.10, 103523 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103523 [arXiv:2208.03330 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.103523 2022

  40. [42]

    Bringmann, T

    T. Bringmann, T. E. Gonzalo, F. Kahlhoefer, J. Matuszak and C. Tasillo, JCAP05, 065 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/065 [arXiv:2311.06346 [astro-ph.CO]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/065 2024

  41. [43]

    Banik, Y

    A. Banik, Y. Cui, Y. D. Tsai and Y. Tsai, [arXiv:2412.16282 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  42. [44]

    Hearing the signals of dark sectors with gravitational wave detectors

    J. Jaeckel, V. V. Khoze and M. Spannowsky, Phys. Rev. D94, no.10, 103519 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.103519 [arXiv:1602.03901 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.103519 2016

  43. [45]

    S. P. Li and K. P. Xie, Phys. Rev. D108, no.5, 055018 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.055018 [arXiv:2307.01086 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.055018 2023

  44. [46]

    Ghosh, A

    T. Ghosh, A. Ghoshal, H. K. Guo, F. Hajkarim, S. F. King, K. Sinha, X. Wang and G. White, JCAP05, 100 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/100 [arXiv:2307.02259 [astro-ph.HE]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/100 2024

  45. [47]

    Di Bari, D

    P. Di Bari, D. Marfatia and Y. L. Zhou, JHEP10, 193 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)193 [arXiv:2106.00025 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2021)193 2021

  46. [48]

    Z. Chen, K. Ye and M. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D107, no.9, 095027 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.095027 [arXiv:2303.11820 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.095027 2023

  47. [49]

    Gouttenoire and T

    Y. Gouttenoire and T. Volansky, Phys. Rev. D110, no.4, 4 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.043514 [arXiv:2305.04942 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.043514 2024

  48. [50]

    Kanemura and S

    S. Kanemura and S. P. Li, JCAP03, 005 (2024) doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/03/005 [arXiv:2308.16390 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/03/005 2024

  49. [51]

    Kierkla, N

    M. Kierkla, N. Ramberg, P. Schicho and D. Schmitt, [arXiv:2506.15496 [hep-ph]]. 36

    work page arXiv

  50. [52]

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Phys. Lett. B245, 561-564 (1990) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90690-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90690-8 1990

  51. [53]

    Supersymmetric CP-violating Currents and Electroweak Baryogenesis

    M. Carena, J. M. Moreno, M. Quiros, M. Seco and C. E. M. Wagner, Nucl. Phys. B599, 158-184 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00032-3 [arXiv:hep-ph/0011055 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00032-3 2001

  52. [54]

    J. M. Cline, [arXiv:hep-ph/0609145 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [55]

    G. A. White, Morgan & Claypool, 2016, ISBN 978-1-68174-456-8, 978-1-68174-457-5 doi:10.1088/978-1-6817-4457-5

    work page doi:10.1088/978-1-6817-4457-5 2016

  54. [56]

    J. M. Cline, PoSTASI2018, 001 (2019) doi:10.22323/1.333.0001 [arXiv:1807.08749 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.333.0001 2019

  55. [57]

    Is There a Hot Electroweak Phase Transition at $m_H\gsim m_W$?

    K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 2887-2890 (1996) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2887 [arXiv:hep-ph/9605288 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.2887 1996

  56. [58]

    Where the electroweak phase transition ends

    M. Gurtler, E. M. Ilgenfritz and A. Schiller, Phys. Rev. D56, 3888-3895 (1997) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56.3888 [arXiv:hep-lat/9704013 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.56.3888 1997

  57. [59]

    Endpoint of the hot electroweak phase transition

    F. Csikor, Z. Fodor and J. Heitger, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 21-24 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.21 [arXiv:hep-ph/9809291 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.21 1999

  58. [60]

    C. T. Hill, S. Pokorski and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. D64, 105005 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.105005 [arXiv:hep-th/0104035 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.105005 2001

  59. [61]

    Girmohanta, Y

    S. Girmohanta, Y. Nakai and Z. Zhang, [arXiv:2507.03747 [hep-ph]]

    work page arXiv

  60. [62]

    Higgs-field Portal into Hidden Sectors

    B. Patt and F. Wilczek, [arXiv:hep-ph/0605188 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [63]

    Holdom, Phys

    B. Holdom, Phys. Lett. B166, 196-198 (1986) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91377-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91377-8 1986

  62. [64]

    A Stueckelberg Extension of the Standard Model

    B. Kors and P. Nath, Phys. Lett. B586, 366-372 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.02.051 [arXiv:hep-ph/0402047 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.02.051 2004

  63. [65]

    The Stueckelberg $Z'$ Extension with Kinetic Mixing and Milli-Charged Dark Matter From the Hidden Sector

    D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. D75, 115001 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.115001 [arXiv:hep-ph/0702123 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.115001 2007

  64. [66]

    Hidden fermion as milli-charged dark matter in Stueckelberg Z' model

    K. Cheung and T. C. Yuan, JHEP03, 120 (2007) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/03/120 [arXiv:hep-ph/0701107 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/03/120 2007

  65. [68]

    Aboubrahim, P

    A. Aboubrahim, P. Nath and Z. Y. Wang, JHEP12, 148 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2021)148 [arXiv:2108.05819 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2021)148 2021

  66. [69]

    M. Du, Z. Liu and P. Nath, Phys. Lett. B834, 137454 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137454 [arXiv:2204.09024 [hep-ph]]. 37

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137454 2022

  67. [70]

    Extra-weakly Interacting Dark Matter

    D. Feldman, B. Kors and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. D75, 023503 (2007) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.023503 [arXiv:hep-ph/0610133 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.023503 2007

  68. [71]

    W. Z. Feng and P. Nath, Phys. Lett. B731, 43-50 (2014) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.02.020 [arXiv:1312.1334 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.02.020 2014

  69. [72]

    D. E. Kaplan, M. A. Luty and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D79, 115016 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.115016 [arXiv:0901.4117 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.115016 2009

  70. [73]

    Asymmetric Dark Matter from a GeV Hidden Sector

    T. Cohen, D. J. Phalen, A. Pierce and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. D82, 056001 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.056001 [arXiv:1005.1655 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.82.056001 2010

  71. [74]

    M. L. Graesser, I. M. Shoemaker and L. Vecchi, JHEP10, 110 (2011) doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2011)110 [arXiv:1103.2771 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep10(2011)110 2011

  72. [75]

    M. Ibe, S. Matsumoto and T. T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B708, 112-118 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.01.032 [arXiv:1110.5452 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.01.032 2012

  73. [76]

    W. Z. Feng, P. Nath and G. Peim, Phys. Rev. D85, 115016 (2012) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.115016 [arXiv:1204.5752 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.115016 2012

  74. [77]

    W. Z. Feng, A. Mazumdar and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. D88, no.3, 036014 (2013) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.036014 [arXiv:1302.0012 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.036014 2013

  75. [78]

    W. Z. Feng and P. Nath, Mod. Phys. Lett. A32, no.5, 1740005 (2017) doi:10.1142/S0217732317400053 [arXiv:1610.01996 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0217732317400053 2017

  76. [79]

    Gauge independence of the bubble nucleation rate in theories with radiative symmetry breaking

    D. Metaxas and E. J. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D53, 836-843 (1996) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.836 [arXiv:hep-ph/9507381 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.53.836 1996

  77. [80]

    On the gauge dependence of vacuum transitions at finite temperature

    M. Garny and T. Konstandin, JHEP07, 189 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2012)189 [arXiv:1205.3392 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep07(2012)189 2012

  78. [81]

    Arunasalam and M

    S. Arunasalam and M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, JHEP08, 138 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)138 [arXiv:2105.07588 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)138 2022

  79. [82]

    L¨ ofgren, M

    J. L¨ ofgren, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho and T. V. I. Tenkanen, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, no.25, 251801 (2023) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.251801 [arXiv:2112.05472 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.130.251801 2023

  80. [83]

    Hirvonen, J

    J. Hirvonen, J. L¨ ofgren, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, P. Schicho and T. V. I. Tenkanen, JHEP 07, 135 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)135 [arXiv:2112.08912 [hep-ph]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2022)135 2022

Showing first 80 references.