Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 93 references

A single relativistic scalar field, with two threshold-gated kinetic terms in integrable Weyl geometry, is claimed to reproduce deep-MOND dynamics in the weak-field limit and to modify gravitational light deflection by exactly twice the ord

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 08:58 UTC pith:EWGK3A75

load-bearing objection The transition function in this otherwise careful paper is backwards, so the MOND terms are switched off precisely in the deep-MOND regime; the central derivation needs a fix before it can be trusted. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2510.17704 v3 pith:EWGK3A75 submitted 2025-10-20 gr-qc astro-ph.GA

Bridging the gap between dark matter and MOND by a relativistc scalar field approach

Erhard Scholz This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.GA
keywords MONDscalar fieldWeyl geometrydeep MOND equationgravitational lensingradial acceleration relationdark mattermodified gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that one scalar field can do double duty: its Bekenstein-type cubic kinetic term generates deep-MOND dynamics for test-particle motion, while a second-order mass-generating term gives the field a non-negligible energy-momentum tensor that acts like a form of dark matter and changes how light is deflected. In the weak-field (Newton-Milgrom) approximation, the total gravitational potential is the sum of the ordinary baryonic Newtonian potential and a scalar-field potential that satisfies the deep MOND equation ∇·(|∇Φ|∇Φ)=a0(4πG)ρ_m. Because the scalar-field energy tensor is traceless and carries pressure, the scalar potential enters the metric with a relative factor: in the centrally symmetric case, lensing from the scalar field is twice as strong as from ordinary matter with the same potential. The model thus offers a concrete bridge between the dark-matter and modified-gravity readings of the missing-mass problem, with distinctive, testable lensing predictions.

Core claim

In the Einstein gauge, the model's scalar field σ is related to the Newtonian potential by Φ^(φ)=c^2 σ. The paper derives the relativistic Milgrom equation ∇λ(|∇σ|∂^λσ) = -a1 β^{-1}(8πκ) tr T from the reduced scalar field equation, after dropping a cubic polynomial p3(x)=(x-2β^{-1}a1)x^2 as negligible in the Milgrom regime. In the flat-space weak-field limit this becomes the deep MOND equation (40). The scalar field's effective energy tensor, extracted from the Einstein equation, is traceless and dominated by second-order derivatives; its Newtonian mass equivalent is twice its energy density because of pressure. Combining the baryonic and scalar potentials, the perturbed metric is g = -(1+2Φ

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the scalar field φ with Weyl weight -1, written in the Einstein gauge as σ = -ln(φ/φ0). Its Lagrangian contains a Bekenstein-type cubic kinetic term L_φ3 ∝ φ^{-2}|Dφ|^3 and a second-order term L_2φ ∝ φ DλDλφ AλAλ, both gated by a transition function h(|∇σ|/a1) that suppresses them when the gradient is timelike or above the MOND threshold. The reduced scalar field equation, obtained by combining the trace of the Einstein equation with the ϕ-variation, simplifies to the relativistic Milgrom equation in the Milgrom regime. On the gravity side, the key identity is that the scalar field's contribution to the source in the Poisson equation includes a pressure term, givin

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the cubic polynomial p3(x)=(x-2β^{-1}a1)x^2 is negligible throughout the Milgrom regime, so the relativistic Milgrom equation and the deep MOND equation follow from the full scalar field equation; if p3 is not small when the field gradient approaches the transition threshold, the model's MOND predictions acquire corrections.

What would settle it

For a spherically symmetric galaxy with a known baryonic mass distribution and a measured rotation curve in the deep-MOND regime, the model predicts that the scalar-field contribution to the gravitational lensing deflection angle is exactly twice the value expected from the phantom-matter distribution under the usual factor-2 rule. A measurement of the Einstein radius in a strong-lensing galaxy, at 10% precision, that agrees with the standard factor-2 rule would falsify this prediction. Alternatively, numerically integrating the full scalar field equation including p3 for a realistic mass dist

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Galactic rotation curves can be explained without particle dark matter: the scalar field produces MONDian accelerations and also contributes its own energy-momentum as an effective dark component.
  • Gravitational lensing in deep-MOND galaxies should be stronger than standard MOND's phantom-matter estimate by a factor of two in spherically symmetric cases, and anisotropic close to disk planes.
  • The model preserves exact Newton/Einstein behavior above the threshold (a_N > 10 a0), so solar-system tests are unaffected.
  • In galaxy clusters, the scalar-field halos of galaxies and hot gas add a Newtonian mass equivalent that lowers the missing mass ratio; for Coma the estimate reduces the discrepancy but may not fully close it.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the neglected cubic polynomial p3 is retained in the scalar field equation, the deep MOND equation receives corrections near the upper transition boundary; these could be tested with high-precision rotation-curve data in the 1–10 a0 range.
  • The anisotropic lensing prediction for disk galaxies is a distinctive signature that could distinguish this model from other relativistic MOND approaches.
  • The paper's suggestion that the scalar field's energy content accounts for cluster missing mass implies a natural extension to cosmological structure formation, though the model is currently silent on early-universe dark matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a relativistic scalar-field extension of Einstein gravity, formulated in integrable Weyl geometry, with a non-minimally coupled scalar field. The Lagrangian contains a Bekenstein-type cubic kinetic term and a second-order mass-generating term, both supposed to be active only when the scalar-field gradient is spacelike and below a MOND-type threshold. The central claim is that, in the weak-field Einstein-gauge limit, the scalar field obeys the deep-MOND equation (40), so that free-fall trajectories are MONDian while light deflection is governed by the modified metric (55), with the scalar potential contributing twice as strongly to lensing as baryonic matter of equal potential. The paper also presents a numerical central-symmetric solution, a Kuzmin-disk analysis, a radial-acceleration relation, and a Coma-cluster estimate.

Significance. If the derivation were sound, the paper would be a noteworthy contribution: it offers a single-scalar-field relativistic MOND framework, with explicit variational calculations (Appendix 6.2), a transparent weak-field reduction, a concrete lensing prediction that differs from the usual MOND expectation, and an attempt to address cluster mass discrepancies. The honest discussion of the model's limitations and the detailed numerical checks are also strengths. However, the central result is compromised by an internal inconsistency in the transition function and by an unjustified smallness estimate for the cubic correction; as written, the deep-MOND equation is not actually the governing equation in the regime where the model claims to reproduce MOND.

major comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (7), (8), §3.3] The transition function is implemented backwards. With h(x;ᾱ,β̄)=g((x−ᾱ)/(β̄−ᾱ)) and g increasing from 0 to 1, h=0 for x≤ᾱ=0.1 and h=1 for x≥β̄=10. Since x=|∇σ|/a1, the deep-MOND regime is x≪1, so h=0 there. Thus the Lagrangian (8) reduces to L_V alone precisely where the Bekenstein and mass terms are supposed to act. Equations (26)–(27) are derived under 'h≡1 in the Milgrom regime', and §3.3 later states that (58) agrees with observation for 'h≡1 (i.e. for a_N≤ᾱ a0)', which contradicts the definition (7). This is not a coefficient-size issue: the gating of the central mechanism is inverted and must be corrected (e.g. by using 1−h or a decreasing transition function) before the derivation of (40) and (58) can be accepted.
  2. [Eqs. (26)–(27), p. 15] The discard of p3(x)=(x−2β^{−1}a1)x^2 is not justified. The stated bound |p3|≤c^{−3}a0^3≪Λ compares a quantity of dimension L^{−3} with Λ of dimension L^{−2} in the paper's own dimensional conventions; the comparison is dimensionally inconsistent. Moreover, even setting dimensions aside, the model's own transition function keeps the Bekenstein and mass terms active up to x=10, where p3∼900 a1^3, far from negligible. Since (27) is the basis for the deep-MOND equation (40) and for the radial-acceleration relation (58), the derivation needs either a correct estimate over the full active interval or an explicit restriction of the claimed regime.
  3. [§2.1, Eqs. (5), (10), (11)] The paper's headline 'single scalar field' is qualified by several additional, independently chosen structures: a non-dynamical timelike unit vector field A^μ in the mass term, the smooth threshold function h (called 'at best metaphoric' on p. 11–12), and constants α=−4, β=2, c1=12√(a1M), a0, λ, and the transition boundaries. The deep-MOND equation (40) is therefore inherited by construction rather than predicted. This is acceptable for a phenomenological model, but the abstract and introduction should state the framework as a parametrized scalar-tensor model, not as a 'single scalar field' derivation of MOND.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title] The title contains a typo: 'relativistc' should be 'relativistic'.
  2. [Fig. 2 and §3.3] The figure-2 caption and the surrounding text include a large, apparently accidental quotation from Hossenfelder and Mistele's paper, with headers such as '4 Comparison with Observation' and discussion of Verlinde-matching. This passage is not integrated into the present argument and should be removed or clearly set off as a quotation with explicit attribution.
  3. [§4.1] The upper smoothing function h̃(x;α̂,β̂)=1−g((x−α̂)/(β̂−α̂)) used for the halo cut-off has the opposite monotonicity from h in Eq. (7). This is presumably the intended direction for a suppression mechanism, but the two uses of 'h' with opposite behavior are confusing and should be reconciled notationally.
  4. [§3.3] The transition variable is x=|∇σ|/a1 in Eq. (7) but y=a_N/a0 in Eq. (57), with the same symbol h used in both places. Since the threshold conditions are different (gradient versus acceleration), the paper should explicitly state the mapping and any approximation used to convert one into the other.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: deep-MOND behavior is an announced input of the Bekenstein-type term; the paper's novel lensing and cluster predictions are derived from the mass term and Einstein equation, not fitted.

full rationale

The central equation (40) is the weak-field limit of the Euler–Lagrange equation (27) of the Bekenstein-type cubic term Lφ3 introduced in (5). This is not a hidden circularity: the paper explicitly announces that it “takes up Bekenstein’s idea of an ‘aquadratic’ Lagrangian” and studies its consequences. The constants α = −4, β = 2 and the integration constant c1 are chosen consistently with the model’s own deep-MOND normalization, but they are not fitted to rotation-curve data; the radial-acceleration relation (58) follows from the assumed Lagrangian and is presented as a consistency check, not as an independent empirical prediction. The genuinely novel content—the pressure-induced factor-2 lensing contribution in (55), the anisotropic refraction for disks, and the Coma cluster mass estimates—is derived from the second-order mass term L2φ and the Einstein equation (21), and would not survive if that term were removed. No load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness/ansatz was found; the author’s earlier Weyl-geometry papers are not used to justify the central claims. Two non-circularity caveats should be flagged: (i) the gating function h in (7) is increasing, so for x = |∇σ|/a1 it vanishes in the deep-MOND, small-gradient regime, whereas the appendix derives (26)–(27) under “in the Milgrom regime (h≡1)” (p. 41); this is an internal-consistency defect in the screening mechanism, not a circular reduction. (ii) The paper itself calls the transition Lagrangian “at best metaphoric” (p. 11–12) and the p3-neglect mixes dimensional orders; these are correctness risks, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 7 axioms · 2 invented entities

The model's contribution is a specific Lagrangian; most of its empirical content (a0, deep-MOND branch, RAR shape) is imported from MOND rather than derived. The free parameters and the non-dynamical A^mu are the price paid for that import, and the paper is transparent about most of them.

free parameters (7)
  • a0 (Milgrom acceleration) = 1.8e-8 cm s^-2 (empirical MOND constant)
    Input from MOND phenomenology; fixes hierarchy xi = E_P / phi0 in (10); not derived in the paper.
  • alpha = -4 in Milgrom regime
    Chosen 'for the relativistic MOND/Milgrom regime' (p. 13) so the reduced scalar field equation takes the deep-MOND form; no independent derivation.
  • beta = 2 in Milgrom regime
    Sets the source coefficient a0 beta^-1 in the relativistic Milgrom equation (27); chosen to reproduce MOND's deep-MOND scaling.
  • lambda (quartic potential coefficient) = set so Lambda = lambda a1^2 ~ observed dark energy (Omega_Lambda ~ 0.7)
    p. 13: 'lambda ~ 3*6^2 Omega_Lambda'; the potential is tuned to the observed cosmological constant.
  • Transition boundaries (alpha_bar, beta_bar) = (0.1, 10)
    Hand-picked 'e.g., alpha_bar = 0.1, beta_bar = 10' (p. 25); controls where MOND terms switch off and shapes the RAR.
  • c1 = 1/2 sqrt(a1 M) = 1/2 sqrt(a1 M)
    Integration constant in (61)/(66); the factor 1/2 is imposed 'to compensate for the factor 2 in (35) and (42)' — a fit to reproduce MOND rotation curves.
  • Coma cluster model densities = rho_g(0) = 6.1e-27 g cm^-3 and stellar parameters
    Appendix 6.3.4: central densities 'chosen such that the empirical constraints in r500 are satisfied' — tuned to the cluster baryonic masses.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Integrable Weyl geometry with vanishing scale-curvature dphi = 0, used as the formal calculus.
    Framework assumption stated in section 1.2/appendix 6.1; not the target result.
  • domain assumption Matter couples to the Einstein-gauge metric g_E and follows its geodesics.
    p. 4 and section 2.1; empirical-frame choice required to translate model fields into observables.
  • ad hoc to paper Bekenstein and mass terms switch on only for spacelike gradient below a MOND threshold, via smooth transition h.
    Invoked in (7)-(9); the paper states the physical reason 'may be a destabilization ... like in Berezhiani/Khoury' and calls the transition Lagrangian 'at best metaphoric' (p. 11-12).
  • ad hoc to paper Non-dynamical timelike unit vector field A^mu exists as background supporting the mass term L_2phi.
    p. 10: 'has to be assumed as an additional non-dynamical structure'; no equation of motion, fixed to (1,0,0,0) in applications.
  • domain assumption Quartic potential in Einstein gauge acts as cosmological constant Lambda.
    From (11), LV = -Lambda/(8 pi kappa); standard for such scalar-tensor potentials.
  • ad hoc to paper Numerical centrally-symmetric solution uses Schwarzschild initial data at r0 = 10 kpc and halo cut-off smoothing on (300,600) kpc.
    Section 4.1; modeling choices for the galaxy-scale integration, not derived.
  • ad hoc to paper Hierarchy factor xi chosen so xi phi0 = E_P and xi^-1 phi0 = a0 hbar.
    Equation (10); fixes the MOND-Planck scale link by definition rather than derivation.
invented entities (2)
  • Non-dynamical timelike unit vector field A^mu no independent evidence
    purpose: Supports the second-order mass term L_2phi = (xi phi) D_lambda D^lambda (xi phi) A^lambda A_lambda, giving the scalar field its DM-like energy and pressure.
    A Lorentz-frame-picking background structure with no equation of motion and no falsifiable handle of its own; fixed to (1,0,0,0) in every application.
  • Scalar field phi of Weyl weight -1 with combined MOND and dark-matter roles independent evidence
    purpose: Simultaneously produces deep-MOND dynamics in the weak field and carries non-negligible mass-energy acting as dark matter (scalar halos).
    The lensing metric (55) and cluster halo densities are falsifiable handles outside the paper (stronger-than-MOND deflection, ~1/R^2 halo profiles), though they remain untested against observations; the deep-MOND phenomenology it matches is input, not prediction.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 51372 in / 20580 out tokens · 180368 ms · 2026-08-04T08:58:58.779551+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

A Lagrangian model for a general relativistic scalar field, formulated in the framework of integrable Weyl geometry, is studied. Under the present assumptions it modifies the light cone structure and induces MOND-like dynamics in the weak field approximation of the Einstein frame (gauge). The Lagrangian contains a Bekenstein-type (``aquadratic'') term and a second order term generating additional mass energy for the scalar field. Both are switched on only if the the scalar field gradient is spacelike and below a MOND-typical threshold, like in the superfluid model of Berezhiani/Khoury. In the weak field limit the Bekenstein term implies a deep MOND equation for the scalar field and leads to MOND\-ian free fall trajectories. The Lagrangian mass term induces non-negligible energy and pressures of the scalar field with the respective consequences for gravitational light deflection.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.17704 by Erhard Scholz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Observed, total acceleration (gtot) versus acceleration due to bary￾onic mass only (gB). Blue squares are data from [2]. Red, solid curve: CEG with Verlinde-matching. Pink shading: 1 σ uncertainty. Dashed, black line: Newtonian gravity without dark matter. For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 33 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    From Brans- Dicke gravity to a geometrical scalar-tensor theory

    Almeida, Tony, Jansen Formiga, Maria Pucheu and Carlos Romero. 2014. “From Brans- Dicke gravity to a geometrical scalar-tensor theory.”Physical Review D89:064047 (10pp.). arXiv:1311.5459. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    Bach, Rudolf and Hermann Weyl. 1922. “Neue Lösungen der Einsteinschen Gravitations- gleichungen. B. Explizite Aufstellung statischer axialsymmetrischer Felder (von R. Bach). Mit einem Zusatz über das statische Zweikörperproblem (von H. Weyl).”Mathematische Zeitschrift13:134–145. English republication in [3]. 30

    1922

  3. [3]

    Bach, Rudolf and Hermann Weyl. 2012. “Republication of: New solutions to Einstein’s equations of gravitation. B. Explicit determination of static, axially symmetric fields. By Rudolf Bach. With a supplement on the static two-body problem. By H. Weyl.”General Relativity and Gravity44:817–832. 58

    2012

  4. [4]

    Resolving the beta-discrepancy for clusters of galaxies

    Bahcall, Neta A. and Lori M. Lubin. 1994. “Resolving the beta-discrepancy for clusters of galaxies.”Astrophysical Journal426:513–515. 50

    1994

  5. [5]

    Bars, Itzhak. 2014. Traversing cosmological singularities. Complete journeys through space- time including antigravity. InBeyond the Big Bang: Prospects for an Eternal Universe, ed. Rudy Vaas. Berlin/Heidelberg etc.: Springer. arXiv:1209.1068. 58

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Local conformal symmetry in physics and cosmology

    Bars, Itzhak, Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok. 2014. “Local conformal symmetry in physics and cosmology.”Physical Review D89:043515. arXiv:1307.1848. 58

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  7. [7]

    Relativistic gravitation theory for the modified Newtonian dy- namics paradigm

    Bekenstein, Jacob. 2004. “Relativistic gravitation theory for the modified Newtonian dy- namics paradigm.”Physical Review D70:083509. 4 58

    2004

  8. [8]

    The modified Newtonian dynamics – MOND and its implications for new physics

    Bekenstein, Jacob. 2006. “The modified Newtonian dynamics – MOND and its implications for new physics.”Contemporary Physics(6):387–403. arXiv:astro-ph/0701848. 2, 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  9. [9]

    Bekenstein, Jacob. 2010. Modified gravity as an alternative to dark matter. InParticle Dark Matter: Observations, Models and Searches, ed. G. Bertone. Cambridge: University Press pp. 95–114. arXiv:1001.3876. 2, 4

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Does the missing mass problem signal the breakdown of Newtonian gravity?

    Bekenstein, Jacob and Mordechai Milgrom. 1984. “Does the missing mass problem signal the breakdown of Newtonian gravity?”Astrophysical Journal286:7–14. 2, 4, 10, 34

    1984

  11. [11]

    Unveiling the Coma cluster structure: From the core to the Hubble flow

    Benisty, David, Jenny Wagner, Sandeep Haridasu and Paolo Salucci. 2025. “Unveiling the Coma cluster structure: From the core to the Hubble flow.” Preprint. arXiv:2504.04135. 50

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Phenomenological conse- quences of superfluid dark matter with baryon-phonon coupling

    Berezhiani, Lasha, Benoit Famaey and Justin Khoury. 2018. “Phenomenological conse- quences of superfluid dark matter with baryon-phonon coupling.”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics(09):21. arXiv:1711.05748. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Theory of dark matter superfluidity

    Berezhiani, Lasha and Justin Khoury. 2015. “Theory of dark matter superfluidity.”Physical Reviews D92(103510). arXiv:1507.01019. 2, 5, 6, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Dark matter superfluidity and galactic dy- namics

    Berezhiani, Lasha and Justin Khoury. 2016. “Dark matter superfluidity and galactic dy- namics.”Physics Letters B753:639–643. arXiv:1506.07877. 2, 5, 6, 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    2002.Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries

    Blagojević, Milutin. 2002.Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries. Bristol/Philadelphia: Insti- tute of Physics Publishing. 3

    2002

  16. [16]

    Exact solutions and approximations of MOND fields of disk galaxies

    Brada, Rafael and Mordehai Milgrom. 1995. “Exact solutions and approximations of MOND fields of disk galaxies.”Monthly Notices of the Royal Academy of Sciences276:453–459. arXiv:astro.phys/9407071. 9, 20, 31

    arXiv 1995

  17. [17]

    Dark matter as a Weyl geometric effect

    Burikham, Piyabut, Tiberiu Harko, Kulapant Pimsamarn and Shahab Shahidi. 2023. “Dark matter as a Weyl geometric effect.”Physical Review D(064008). 5, 38, 39

    2023

  18. [18]

    Einstein-Weyl geometry

    Calderbank, David; Pedersen, Henrik. 1998. “Einstein-Weyl geometry.”Advances in Math- ematics97:74–109. 3

    1998

  19. [19]

    Scale covariant theory of gravitation and astrophysical application

    Canuto, Vittorio, P.J. Adams, S.-H. Hsieh and Elaine Tsiang. 1977. “Scale covariant theory of gravitation and astrophysical application.”Physical Review D16:1643–1663. 7

    1977

  20. [20]

    2011.Beyond Einstein Gravity

    Capozziello, Salvatore and Valerio Faraoni. 2011.Beyond Einstein Gravity. A Survey of Gravitational Theories for Cosmology and Astrophysics. Dordrecht etc.: Springer. 40

    2011

  21. [21]

    2004.Spacetime and Geometry

    Carroll, Sean. 2004.Spacetime and Geometry. San Francisco: Addison Wesley. 16, 47, 54

    2004

  22. [22]

    Testing the strong equivalence principle: Detection of the external field effect in rotationally supported galaxies

    Chae, Kyu-Hung, Federico Lelli, Harry Desmond, Stacy McGaugh, Pengfei Li and James Schombert. 2020. “Testing the strong equivalence principle: Detection of the external field effect in rotationally supported galaxies.”Astrophysical Journal904:20pp. 35

    2020

  23. [23]

    The renormalization group and Weyl invariance

    Codello, Alessandro, Giulio D’Orodico, Carlo Pagani and Roberto Percacci. 2013. “The renormalization group and Weyl invariance.”Classical and Quantum Gravity30:115015 (22 pp.). arXiv:1210.3284. 3, 39

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    On the embedding of space-time in five-dimensionalWeylspaces

    Dahia, Fábio, A.T. Gomez and Carlos Romero. 2008. “On the embedding of space-time in five-dimensionalWeylspaces.”Journal of Mathematical Physics49:102501. arXiv:0711.2754. 3 59

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    Long range forces and broken symmetries

    Dirac, Paul A.M. 1973. “Long range forces and broken symmetries.”Proceedings Royal Society London A333:403–418. 3, 6

    1973

  26. [26]

    Broken Weyl invariance and the origin of mass

    Drechsler, Wolfgang and Hanno Tann. 1999. “Broken Weyl invariance and the origin of mass.”Foundations of Physics29(7):1023–1064. arXiv:gr-qc/98020. 3, 40

    1999

  27. [27]

    1923.The Mathematical Theory of Relativity

    Eddington, Arthur S. 1923.The Mathematical Theory of Relativity. Cambridge: University Press. 2nd edition 1924. 3

    1923

  28. [28]

    Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND): Observational phenomenology and relativistic extensions

    Famaey, Benoît and Stacy McGaugh. 2012. “Modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND): Observational phenomenology and relativistic extensions.”Living Reviews in Relativity 15(10):1–159. 2, 18, 19, 23, 29, 34, 55

    2012

  29. [29]

    Weyl manifolds

    Folland, George B. 1970. “Weyl manifolds.”Journal of Differential Geometry4:145–153. 3

    1970

  30. [30]

    1997.The Geometry of Physics

    Frankel, Theodore. 1997.The Geometry of Physics. Cambridge: University Press. 22004. 42

    1997

  31. [31]

    2003.The Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravitation

    Fujii, Yasunori and Kei-Chi Maeda. 2003.The Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravitation. Cam- bridge: University Press. 40

    2003

  32. [32]

    La 1-forme de torsion d’une variété hermitienne compacte

    Gauduchon, Paul. 1995. “La 1-forme de torsion d’une variété hermitienne compacte.”Jour- nal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik469:1–50. 3

    1995

  33. [33]

    Weyl conformal geometry vs Weyl anomaly

    Ghilencea, Dumitru. 2023. “Weyl conformal geometry vs Weyl anomaly.”Journal of High Energy Physics10(113). arXiv:2309.11372. 39

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Spontaneous breaking of Weyl quadratic gravity to Einstein action and Higgs potential

    Ghilencea, Dumitru M. 2019. “Spontaneous breaking of Weyl quadratic gravity to Einstein action and Higgs potential.”Journal of High Energy Physics2019:Article 49. arXiv:1812.08613. 39, 47

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Standard Model in Weyl conformal geometry

    Ghilencea, Dumitru M. 2022. “Standard Model in Weyl conformal geometry.”European Physical Journal C82(23):17 pages. 39

    2022

  36. [36]

    Quantum gravity from Weyl conformal geoemtry

    Ghilencea, Dumitru M. 2025. “Quantum gravity from Weyl conformal geoemtry.”European Physical Journal C85:15 pages. 3, 37, 39

    2025

  37. [37]

    Cosmological evolution in Weyl conformal geometry

    Ghilencea, Dumitru and Tiberiu Harko. 2021. “Cosmological evolution in Weyl conformal geometry.”. arXiv:2110.07056. 39

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    Geometric realizations, curva- ture decompositions, and Weyl manifolds

    Gilkey, Peter, Stana Nikcevic and Udo Simon. 2011. “Geometric realizations, curva- ture decompositions, and Weyl manifolds.”Journal of Geometry and Physics61:270–275. arXiv:1002.5027. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Giulini, Domenico, André Großhardt and Philip Schwartz. 2023. Coupling quantum matter and gravity. InModified and Quantum Gravity: From Theory to Experimental Searches on All Scales, ed. Christian Pfeifer and Claus Lämmerzahl. Vol. 1017 Springer-Nature chapter 16, pp. 491–550. 19

    2023

  40. [40]

    2025.Hermann Weyl

    Giulini, Domenico and Erhard Scholz. 2025.Hermann Weyl. Raum·Zeit·Materie. Klas- sische Texte der Wissenschaft Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum. 31, 52

    2025

  41. [41]

    1994.Einführung in die Kosmologie

    Goenner, Hubert. 1994.Einführung in die Kosmologie. Heidelberg etc: Spektrum. 28 60

    1994

  42. [42]

    Cosmological implications of the Weyl geometric gravity theory

    Harko, Tiberiu and Shahab Shahidi. 2024. “Cosmological implications of the Weyl geometric gravity theory.”European Physical Journal C84:509. 37

    2024

  43. [43]

    Weyl manifolds and Einstein-Weyl manifolds

    Higa, Tatsuo. 1993. “Weyl manifolds and Einstein-Weyl manifolds.”Commentarii Mathe- matici Sancti Pauli42:143–160. 3

    1993

  44. [44]

    A covariant version of Verlinde’s emergent gravity

    Hossenfelder, Sabine. 2017. “A covariant version of Verlinde’s emergent gravity.”Physical Reviews D95:124018. arXiv:1703.01415. 5, 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    The redshift-dependence of radial accel- eration: Modified gravity versus particle dark matter

    Hossenfelder, Sabine and Tobias Mistele. 2018. “The redshift-dependence of radial accel- eration: Modified gravity versus particle dark matter.”International Journal of Modern Physics D27(14):1847010. arXiv:1803.08683. 5, 6, 25, 55

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    Open star clusters and their asymmetrical tidal tails

    Kroupa, Pavel, Jan Pflamm-Altenburg, Sergej Mazurenko, Wenjie Wu, Ingo Thies, Vikrant Jadhav and Tereza Jerabkova. 2024. “Open star clusters and their asymmetrical tidal tails.” Astrophysical Journal970(94). 35

    2024

  47. [47]

    Dark matter = modified gravity? Scrutinising the spacetime-matter distinction through the modified gravity/dark matter lens

    Lehmkuhl, Dennis and Niels Martens. 2020. “Dark matter = modified gravity? Scrutinising the spacetime-matter distinction through the modified gravity/dark matter lens.”Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics72:237–250. 6, 19

    2020

  48. [48]

    Dynamical effects of the scale invariance of the empty space. The fall of dark matter?

    Maeder, André. 2017. “Dynamical effects of the scale invariance of the empty space. The fall of dark matter?”. arXiv:1710.11425. 5, 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    MOND as a peculiar case of SIV theory

    Maeder, André. 2023. “MOND as a peculiar case of SIV theory.”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society520:1447–1455. 5, 6, 7

    2023

  50. [50]

    Scale invariance, horizons, and inflation

    Maeder, André and V.G. Gueorguiev. 2021. “Scale invariance, horizons, and inflation.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society504:4005–4014. 6, 7

    2021

  51. [51]

    The mass discrepancy-acceleration relation: Disk mass and the dark matter distribution

    McGaugh, Stacy. 2004. “The mass discrepancy-acceleration relation: Disk mass and the dark matter distribution.”Astrophysical Journal. arXiv:astro-ph/0403610. 55, 56

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  52. [52]

    Radial Acceleration relation in rotationally supported galaxies

    McGaugh, Stacy, Federico Lelli and James Schombert. 2016. “Radial Acceleration relation in rotationally supported galaxies.”Physical Review Letters117:201101. arXiv:1609.05917. 25, 54, 56

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    Gravitational fields of rotating disks and black holes

    Meinel, Reinhard. 2000. “Gravitational fields of rotating disks and black holes.”Annalen der Physik512:335–341. arxiv.gr-qc/9912055. 32

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  54. [54]

    A modification of Newtonian dynamics as a possible alterna- tive to the hidden matter hypothesis

    Milgrom, Mordechai. 1983a. “A modification of Newtonian dynamics as a possible alterna- tive to the hidden matter hypothesis.”Astrophysical Journal270:365–370. 34

  55. [55]

    A modification of Newtonian dynamics: implications for galaxy systems

    Milgrom, Mordechai. 1983b. “A modification of Newtonian dynamics: implications for galaxy systems.”Astrophysical Journal270:371–383. 34, 35

  56. [56]

    The shape of ‘dark matter’ haloes of disc galaxies according to MOND

    Milgrom, Mordehai. 2001. “The shape of ‘dark matter’ haloes of disc galaxies according to MOND.”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society326:1261–1264. 19, 31, 32, 49

    2001

  57. [57]

    Bimetric MOND gravity

    Milgrom, Mordehai. 2009. “Bimetric MOND gravity.”Physical Review D80(123536). 4

    2009

  58. [58]

    Matter and twin matter in bimetric MOND

    Milgrom, Mordehai. 2010a. “Matter and twin matter in bimetric MOND.”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society405:1129–1139. 4, 5, 6 61

  59. [59]

    Quasi-linear formulation of MOND

    Milgrom, Mordehai. 2010b. “Quasi-linear formulation of MOND.”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society403:886–895. 19

  60. [60]

    Broader view of bimetric MOND

    Milgrom, Mordehai. 2022. “Broader view of bimetric MOND.”Physical Review D 106(084010). 4, 6

    2022

  61. [61]

    Isotropic cosmologies in Weyl geometry

    Miritzis, John. 2004. “Isotropic cosmologies in Weyl geometry.”Classical and Quantum Gravity21:3043–3056. arXiv:gr-qc/0402039. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    Misner, Charles, Kip Thorne and John A. Wheeler. 1973.Gravitation. San Francisco: Freeman. 23

    1973

  63. [63]

    General relativistic gravitational field of a rigidly rotating disk of dust: solution in terms of ultraelliptic functions

    Neugebauer, Gernot and Reinhard Meinel. 1995. “General relativistic gravitational field of a rigidly rotating disk of dust: solution in terms of ultraelliptic functions.”Physical Review Letters75:3046–3047. 32

    1995

  64. [64]

    1976.Gravitation and Spacetime

    Ohanian, Hans. 1976.Gravitation and Spacetime. New York: Norton & Co. 54

    1976

  65. [65]

    Weyl gauge-vector and complex dilaton scalar for conformal sym- metry and its breaking

    Ohanian, Hans. 2016. “Weyl gauge-vector and complex dilaton scalar for conformal sym- metry and its breaking.”General Relativity and Gravity48(25):DOI 10.1007/s10714–016– 2023–8. arXiv:1502.00020. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [66]

    1997.The Dawning of Gauge Theory

    O’Raifeartaigh, Lochlainn. 1997.The Dawning of Gauge Theory. Princeton: University Press. 63

    1997

  67. [67]

    Ornea, Liviu. 2001. Weyl structures in quaternionic geomety. A state of the art. InSelected Topics in Geometry and Mathematical Physics, Vol. 1, ed. E. Barletta. Potenza: Univ. degli Studi della Basilicata pp. 43–80. arXiv:math/0105041. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  68. [68]

    Pauli, Wolfgang. 1921. Relativitätstheorie. InEncyklopädie der Mathematischen Wis- senschaften. Vol.BandV,TeilIITeubnerpp.539–775. Neuherausgegebenundkommentiert von D. Giulini, Berlin/Heidelberg etc. (Springer) 2000. 3

    1921

  69. [69]

    Renormalization group flow of Weyl-invariant dilaton gravity

    Percacci, Roberto. 2011. “Renormalization group flow of Weyl-invariant dilaton gravity.” New Journal of Physics13(125013). arXiv:1110.6758. 39

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  70. [70]

    1989.Zur Kinematik Weylscher Raum-Zeit-Modelle.Dissertationsschrift

    Perlick, Volker. 1989.Zur Kinematik Weylscher Raum-Zeit-Modelle.Dissertationsschrift. Berlin: Fachbereich Physik, TU Berlin. 3

    1989

  71. [71]

    Scale invariant theory of gravity and the standard model of particles

    Quiros, Israel. 2014. “Scale invariant theory of gravity and the standard model of particles.” Preprint. arXiv:1401.2643. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  72. [72]

    Cosmological Implications and Physical Properties of an X-Ray Flux-Limited Sample of Galaxy Clusters

    Reiprich, Thomas. 2001. “Cosmological Implications and Physical Properties of an X-Ray Flux-Limited Sample of Galaxy Clusters.” Dissertation University Munich. 36, 49, 50

    2001

  73. [73]

    General relativity and Weyl frames

    Romero, Carlos, J.B. Fonseca-Neto and Maria L. Pucheu. 2011. “General relativity and Weyl frames.”International Journal of Modern Physics A26(22):3721–3729. arXiv:1106.5543. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  74. [74]

    A stratified framework for scalar-tensor theories of modified dy- namics

    Sanders, Robert. 1997. “A stratified framework for scalar-tensor theories of modified dy- namics.”Astrophysical Journal480:492ff. 4

    1997

  75. [75]

    Clusters of galaxies with modified Newtonian dynamics

    Sanders, Robert. 2003. “Clusters of galaxies with modified Newtonian dynamics.”Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society342:901–908. 36, 37, 49, 50 62

    2003

  76. [76]

    Weyl geometric gravity and electroweak symmetry ‘breaking’

    Scholz, Erhard. 2011. “Weyl geometric gravity and electroweak symmetry ‘breaking’.”An- nalen der Physik523:507–530. arxiv:1102.3478. 3

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  77. [77]

    Clusters of galaxies in a Weyl geometric approach to gravity

    Scholz, Erhard. 2016. “Clusters of galaxies in a Weyl geometric approach to gravity.”Journal of Gravity (Hindawi)2016:Articel ID 9706704. arXiv:1506.09138. Corrigendum inJournal of Gravity (Hindawi)(2017) ID 9151485

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    Scholz, Erhard. 2017. Paving the way for transitions – a case for Weyl geometry. InTowards a Theory of Spacetime Theories, ed. D. Lehmkuhl et al. Vol. 13 ofEinstein StudiesBasel, Berlin etc.: Birkhäuser-Springer pp. 171–224. arXiv:1206.1559. 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  79. [79]

    A general class of gravitational theories as alternatives to dark matter where the speed of gravity always equals the speed of light

    Skordis, Constantinos and Tom Złośnik. 2019. “A general class of gravitational theories as alternatives to dark matter where the speed of gravity always equals the speed of light.” Preprint. arXiv:1905.09465. 5

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    New relativistic theory for Modified New- tonian Dynamics

    Skordis, Constantinos and Tom Złośnik. 2021. “New relativistic theory for Modified New- tonian Dynamics.”Physical Review Letters127(161302). arXiv:2007.00082. 5, 6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.