Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 120 references

Kondo breakdown induced by non-Hermitian complex hybridization

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that a complex-valued impurity-bath hybridization alone drives the Kondo screening cloud to break down at a sharp transition, with the renormalized resonance width vanishing when Im(1/Δ) = -1/E_d.

desk verdict The slave-boson mechanism is solid and the paper is worth a referee, but the claimed exact Bethe ansatz support doesn't survive contact with the phase of α. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.20186 v2 pith:Y5WZH2AR submitted 2025-10-23 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph

Kazuki Yamamoto , Masaya Nakagawa , Norio Kawakami This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gasquant-ph MSC 81V7082B2382B27
keywords non-HermitianAndersonimpuritymodelKondobreakdowncomplexhybridizationslave-bosonmean-fieldtheoryBetheansatzeffectquantumphasetransitionLehmannrepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a non-Hermitian Anderson impurity model in which the hybridization between an impurity spin and a Fermi sea is complex. It argues that, after interactions renormalize this complex hybridization, the Kondo resonance width shrinks and eventually hits zero, driving a quantum phase transition from the screened Kondo phase to an unscreened phase. The breakdown is characterized by a single complex parameter, the renormalized hybridization, and by a complex Kondo scale that is the analytic continuation of the usual Kondo temperature. The authors support the mean-field transition condition with an exact Bethe-ansatz calculation, and they show that the standard Lehmann representation of the Green function fails once the resonance width changes sign beyond the transition.

What carries the argument

The central object is the complex hybridization Δ̃ = πρ Ṽ^2 and its renormalized counterpart Δ_b = b_0^2 Δ̃. In the slave-boson mean-field treatment, Δ_b is the only complex parameter that survives in the Kondo regime, and its real part controls the resonance width while its imaginary part controls the peak shift. The Bethe-ansatz part relies on the S-matrix S_ij = (k_i - k_j + 2iΔ̃ P_ij)/(k_i - k_j - 2iΔ̃), which satisfies the Yang-Baxter equation, leading to nested Bethe equations whose impurity density of states gives the inverse Kondo scale.

What would settle it

Sweep the imaginary part of the hybridization V upward for a fixed deep impurity level E_d and compute the impurity resonance width by an independent numerically exact method; the paper's claim is falsified if the width does not vanish when Im(1/Δ) = -1/E_d, or if the complex-contour deformation needed for the Bethe-ansatz distribution functions breaks down before that point.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the renormalized complex hybridization Δ_b induces the Kondo breakdown: in the Kondo regime the real and imaginary parts of the renormalized impurity level are effectively pinned near zero, so Δ_b is the only complex quantity that matters. The quantum phase transition occurs when the renormalized resonance width Re Δ_b ∓ Im λ̃ vanishes, which the slave-boson mean-field theory places at Im(1/Δ) = -1/E_d. The corresponding non-Hermitian Kondo scale is T̃_NH^K = D exp(π E_d / (2Δ)), and the same condition emerges from the exact Bethe-ansatz solution, up to renormalization of the impurity level. The paper further shows that the conventional analytic continuation from Ma

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the non-Hermitian Bethe-ansatz S-matrix with complex Δ still satisfies the Yang-Baxter equation and that the complex quasimomentum contours can be shifted onto the real axis without crossing poles; if that fails, the exact support for the transition condition is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is correct, the Kondo breakdown is a single-parameter phenomenon: once the impurity level is deep, only the renormalized complex hybridization Δ_b controls the transition.
  • The complex Kondo scale T̃_NH^K = D exp(π E_d/(2Δ)) provides a quantitative generalization of the Kondo temperature, with its real part acting as the resonance width and its vanishing marking the phase boundary.
  • The transition condition Im(1/Δ) = -1/E_d also appears in the exact Bethe-ansatz treatment, supporting the mean-field result beyond the saddle-point approximation.
  • Because the same effective Hamiltonian reduces, through second-order perturbation theory, to the non-Hermitian Kondo model with two-body loss, the complex-hybridization model unifies previously separate one-body-loss and two-body-loss routes to Kondo breakdown.
  • Beyond the transition the resonance width changes sign, and the paper argues that the standard analytic continuation from Matsubara to retarded Green functions fails, placing a caveat on spectral calculations in the strong-dissipation regime.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit is that a local complex hybridization offers a microscopic route to Kondo destruction in lattice heavy-fermion models, where a real-space array of such impurities could produce a quantum critical point distinct from the usual antiferromagnetic route.
  • A direct experimental test could use an ultracold-atomic realization of the Anderson impurity with two tunnel amplitudes whose relative phase is tunable: the predicted transition point Im(1/Δ) = -1/E_d gives a quantitative target that does not require fitting the Kondo scale.
  • The Lehmann-representation caveat suggests that Matsubara-based numerical simulations of dissipative impurity models may misrepresent the spectral function once dissipation is strong enough to reverse the effective width, so real-time or Lindblad-based methods would be more trustworthy in that region.
  • If the Bethe-ansatz contour assumption holds only for weak non-Hermiticity, the phase boundary may be shifted in the strong-dissipation regime; testing the distribution functions against a numerically exact solution of the finite-size Bethe equations would clarify where the exact result applies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a non-Hermitian Anderson impurity model with a complex hybridization V~ = V0 - iV in the infinite-U limit. Using slave-boson mean-field theory, the authors derive a renormalized complex hybridization Δ_b and a complex Kondo scale ~T_NH^K = D exp(πEd/(2Δ)). They argue that the vanishing of the real part of the renormalized resonance width signals a Kondo breakdown, with transition condition Im(1/Δ) = -1/Ed (Eq. 14). The paper further claims exact Bethe-ansatz support for this condition, and discusses the relation to the non-Hermitian Kondo model with two-body loss and the failure of the conventional analytic-continuation Lehmann representation near the breakdown.

Significance. If established, the proposed single-complex-parameter mechanism is an appealing unification of previously studied Kondo-breakdown scenarios in non-Hermitian impurity systems. The slave-boson mean-field construction is carefully presented, and the numerical agreement in Fig. 3 between the analytical Kondo scale and the resonance width is a genuine strength. The paper also provides a useful caution about the breakdown of analytic continuation in the Lehmann representation. However, the claimed exact Bethe-ansatz support is currently not fully rigorous because the derivation omits control of a multiplicative normalization phase and relies on unproven contour-deformation assumptions. These issues affect a load-bearing part of the paper's central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix C, Eq. (C32) and Eq. (41)]
  2. [Sec. IV and Appendix C, Eq. (C8)]
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II D, Eq. (13)]
  2. [Eq. (32)]
  3. [Fig. 2]
  4. [Appendix A, Eq. (A2)]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity: the transition condition is solved from the model's mean-field SCEs and cross-checked by Bethe ansatz; minor self-citations are not load-bearing, and the BA prefactor phase issue is a correctness gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. Eq. (1) defines the NH-AIM; the slave-boson SCEs (6) are derived in Appendix B, and Eqs. (8)-(12) are an asymptotic solution of those SCEs, giving T̃_NH^K = D exp(πE_d/(2Δ)). Eq. (14) then follows as Re[T̃_NH^K]=0; this is a derived condition, not a fitted input, and the numerical solution of (6) cross-checks with Eq. (12) without external fitting. The Bethe-ansatz route is also independent in structure: D_s^(i) ~ exp(−πẼ_d/(2Δ)) follows from the nested BA equations in Appendix C, and the breakdown condition Re[D_s^(i)^{−1}]=0 reproduces the same exponential condition. This is a cross-check rather than a re-use of the target result. Self-citations [63,86] appear for background, for the SB generalization, and for the NH Kondo mapping; the mapping in Sec. III is explicitly derived by second-order perturbation, so no load-bearing claim reduces to a self-citation. One issue should be weighed as a correctness risk rather than circularity: in Appendix C, D_s^(i) = α e^{−πẼ_d/(2Δ)} with α left uncomputed, and the text says 'the contribution coming from α^{-1} can be ignored' when imposing Re[D_s^(i)^{−1}]=0. Since α multiplies the exponential, its phase shifts the zero unless α is real positive, which is never shown; Eq. (41) is therefore an estimate, not a rigorous BA consequence. Because no parameter is fitted and the target condition is not inserted into the inputs, this does not make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data; V0, V, E_d, and D are physical inputs of the model, and the figures use illustrative values (V0 = 0.45, D = 1). The only new 'object' introduced is the complex Kondo scale T_NH^K, which is a derived quantity, not an entity.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The complex hybridization model Eq. (1) is an effective model whose physics is determined only by Ṽ² = Ṽ_kd Ṽ_dk; k-dependence and density of states reduce to constants ρ = 1/(2D).
    Section II A: this turns the microscopic couplings into the single complex parameter Δ = πρ Ṽ² and is needed for the closed-form self-consistent equations.
  • ad hoc to paper The infinite-U slave-boson saddle point with complex b0 and complex λ̃, with b and b̄ not complex conjugates, describes the effective ground state; the partition function uses eigenstates with smallest real part of energy.
    Section II B and Appendix B: this is a mean-field approximation whose validity for non-Hermitian systems is assumed, not derived.
  • domain assumption s-wave scattering maps the 3D problem to a chiral 1D problem, and the non-Hermitian S-matrix (Eq. 24) with complex Δ satisfies the Yang-Baxter equation; the Bethe ansatz remains valid for sufficiently weak non-Hermiticity (sign of Im k_α^± unchanged).
    Section IV: this is load-bearing for the exact BA support of the transition.
  • ad hoc to paper Fourier transforms over complex quasimomentum paths can be deformed onto the real axis without crossing poles (Eq. C8).
    Appendix C: this path-deformation assumption is needed to derive the distribution-function equations that yield Eq. (40).
  • standard math Standard Bethe-ansatz solution of the infinite-U Anderson model (Refs. [5, 6, 93–103]) applies to the non-Hermitian generalization.
    Section IV: the nested Bethe equations (29)–(30) are inherited from the known exact solution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Kondo breakdown induced by non-Hermitian complex hybridization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y5WZH2AR

@misc{pith2026251020186,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Kondo breakdown induced by non-Hermitian complex hybridization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y5WZH2AR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.20186}
}
read the original abstract

Recently, a non-Hermitian Anderson impurity model with one-body loss has been studied in [Phys. Rev. B 111, 125157 (2025)}], and it has been demonstrated that the renormalization effect generated by strong correlations counterintuitively changes the nature of dissipation into an emergent many-body dissipation that causes a Kondo breakdown. In a closely related context, it is also known that two-body loss in a non-Hermitian Kondo model triggers the Kondo breakdown. To elucidate the essence of these phenomena, we study the Anderson impurity model with a non-Hermitian complex hybridization as an effective model that provides a simple understanding of the Kondo breakdown. Using the slave-boson mean-field theory, we show that this model can explain the Kondo breakdown with a single complex parameter. Furthermore, we provide the exact Bethe ansatz solutions that support the results obtained by the slave-boson mean-field theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.20186 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Real and (b) imaginary parts of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. By comparing Fig. 1(a) and 1(b) with Fig. 2(e) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Numerical solutions of the SCEs (6). (a), (b) Resonance width for the retarded and the advanced Green functions. (c), (d) Imaginary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic illustration of the Kondo model implemented with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Prog

    J. Kondo, Resistance minimum in dilute magnetic alloys, Prog. Theor. Phys.32, 37 (1964)

    1964

  2. [2]

    A. C. Hewson,The Kondo problem to heavy fermions(Cam- bridge university press, 1997)

    1997

  3. [3]

    Coleman,Introduction to many-body physics(Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    P. Coleman,Introduction to many-body physics(Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    P. W. Anderson, Localized magnetic states in metals, Phys. Rev.124, 41 (1961)

    1961

  5. [5]

    Tsvelick and P

    A. Tsvelick and P. Wiegmann, Exact results in the theory of magnetic alloys, Adv. Phys.32, 453 (1983)

    1983

  6. [6]

    Okiji and N

    A. Okiji and N. Kawakami, Thermodynamic properties of the Anderson model, J. App. Phys.55, 1931 (1984)

    1931

  7. [7]

    Y . Meir, N. S. Wingreen, and P. A. Lee, Transport through a strongly interacting electron system: Theory of periodic con- ductance oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 3048 (1991)

    1991

  8. [8]

    C. W. J. Beenakker, Theory of coulomb-blockade oscillations in the conductance of a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B44, 1646 (1991)

    1991

Show all 120 references
  1. [9]

    Meir and N

    Y . Meir and N. S. Wingreen, Landauer formula for the cur- rent through an interacting electron region, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2512 (1992)

    1992

  2. [10]

    Y . Meir, N. S. Wingreen, and P. A. Lee, Low-temperature transport through a quantum dot: The Anderson model out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2601 (1993)

    1993

  3. [11]

    D. C. Ralph and R. A. Buhrman, Kondo-assisted and resonant tunneling via a single charge trap: A realization of the An- derson model out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3401 (1994)

    1994

  4. [12]

    L ´opez and D

    R. L ´opez and D. S ´anchez, Nonequilibrium Spintronic Trans- port through an Artificial Kondo Impurity: Conductance, Magnetoresistance, and Shot Noise, Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 116602 (2003)

    2003

  5. [13]

    Coleman, New approach to the mixed-valence problem, Phys

    P. Coleman, New approach to the mixed-valence problem, Phys. Rev. B29, 3035 (1984)

    1984

  6. [14]

    Coleman, Mixed valence as an almost broken symmetry, Phys

    P. Coleman, Mixed valence as an almost broken symmetry, Phys. Rev. B35, 5072 (1987)

    1987

  7. [15]

    Newns and N

    D. Newns and N. Read, Mean-field theory of intermediate va- lence/heavy fermion systems, Adv. Phys.36, 799 (1987)

    1987

  8. [16]

    Schr ¨oder, G

    A. Schr ¨oder, G. Aeppli, R. Coldea, M. Adams, O. Stockert, H. L ¨ohneysen, E. Bucher, R. Ramazashvili, and P. Coleman, Onset of antiferromagnetism in heavy-fermion metals, Nature 407, 351 (2000)

    2000

  9. [17]

    Aynajian, E

    P. Aynajian, E. H. da Silva Neto, A. Gyenis, R. E. Baumbach, J. D. Thompson, Z. Fisk, E. D. Bauer, and A. Yazdani, Visu- alizing heavy fermions emerging in a quantum critical Kondo lattice, Nature486, 201 (2012)

    2012

  10. [18]

    Goldhaber-Gordon, H

    D. Goldhaber-Gordon, H. Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, D. Abusch- Magder, U. Meirav, and M. Kastner, Kondo effect in a single- electron transistor, Nature391, 156 (1998)

    1998

  11. [19]

    S. M. Cronenwett, T. H. Oosterkamp, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, A tunable Kondo effect in quantum dots, Science281, 540 (1998)

    1998

  12. [20]

    I. V . Borzenets, J. Shim, J. C. Chen, A. Ludwig, A. D. Wieck, S. Tarucha, H.-S. Sim, and M. Yamamoto, Observation of the Kondo screening cloud, Nature579, 210 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Scazza, C

    F. Scazza, C. Hofrichter, M. H ¨ofer, P. De Groot, I. Bloch, and S. F ¨olling, Observation of two-orbital spin-exchange interac- tions with ultracold SU(N)-symmetric fermions, Nat. Phys. 10, 779 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Riegger, N

    L. Riegger, N. Darkwah Oppong, M. H ¨ofer, D. R. Fernandes, I. Bloch, and S. F ¨olling, Localized Magnetic Moments with Tunable Spin Exchange in a Gas of Ultracold Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 143601 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    K. Ono, Y . Amano, T. Higomoto, Y . Saito, and Y . Takahashi, Observation of spin-exchange dynamics between itinerant and localized 171Ybatoms, Phys. Rev. A103, L041303 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    A. J. Daley, Quantum trajectories and open many-body quan- tum systems, Adv. Phys.63, 77 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    Ashida, Z

    Y . Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Adv. Phys.69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Fazio, J

    R. Fazio, J. Keeling, L. Mazza, and M. Schiro, Many-body open quantum systems, arXiv:2409.10300

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Syassen, D

    N. Syassen, D. M. Bauer, M. Lettner, T. V olz, D. Dietze, J. J. Garcia-Ripoll, J. I. Cirac, G. Rempe, and S. D ¨urr, Strong dis- sipation inhibits losses and induces correlations in cold molec- ular gases, Science320, 1329 (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    B. Yan, S. A. Moses, B. Gadway, J. P. Covey, K. R. Hazzard, A. M. Rey, D. S. Jin, and J. Ye, Observation of dipolar spin- exchange interactions with lattice-confined polar molecules, Nature (London)501, 521 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    Y . S. Patil, S. Chakram, and M. Vengalattore, Measurement- Induced Localization of an Ultracold Lattice Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 140402 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    H. P. L ¨uschen, P. Bordia, S. S. Hodgman, M. Schreiber, S. Sarkar, A. J. Daley, M. H. Fischer, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and U. Schneider, Signatures of Many-Body Localization in a Controlled Open Quantum System, Phys. Rev. X7, 011034 (2017)

    2017

  23. [31]

    Tomita, S

    T. Tomita, S. Nakajima, I. Danshita, Y . Takasu, and Y . Takahashi, Observation of the Mott insulator to superfluid 16 crossover of a driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard system, Sci. Adv.3, e1701513 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    Sponselee, L

    K. Sponselee, L. Freystatzky, B. Abeln, M. Diem, B. Hundt, A. Kochanke, T. Ponath, B. Santra, L. Mathey, K. Sengstock, and C. Becker, Dynamics of ultracold quantum gases in the dissipative Fermi–Hubbard model, Quantum Sci. Technol.4, 014002 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    Bouganne, M

    R. Bouganne, M. B. Aguilera, A. Ghermaoui, J. Beugnon, and F. Gerbier, Anomalous decay of coherence in a dissipa- tive many-body system, Nat. Phys.16, 21 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Honda, S

    K. Honda, S. Taie, Y . Takasu, N. Nishizawa, M. Nakagawa, and Y . Takahashi, Observation of the Sign Reversal of the Magnetic Correlation in a Driven-Dissipative Fermi Gas in Double Wells, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 063001 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Barontini, R

    G. Barontini, R. Labouvie, F. Stubenrauch, A. V ogler, V . Guar- rera, and H. Ott, Controlling the Dynamics of an Open Many- Body Quantum System with Localized Dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 035302 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    Labouvie, B

    R. Labouvie, B. Santra, S. Heun, and H. Ott, Bistability in a Driven-Dissipative Superfluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 235302 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Benary, C

    J. Benary, C. Baals, E. Bernhart, J. Jiang, M. R ¨ohrle, and H. Ott, Experimental observation of a dissipative phase tran- sition in a multi-mode many-body quantum system, New J. Phys.24, 103034 (2022)

    2022

  30. [38]

    Takasu, T

    Y . Takasu, T. Yagami, Y . Ashida, R. Hamazaki, Y . Kuno, and Y . Takahashi, PT-symmetric non-Hermitian quantum many- body system using ultracold atoms in an optical lattice with controlled dissipation, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys.2020, 12A110 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Yamamoto, M

    K. Yamamoto, M. Nakagawa, N. Tsuji, M. Ueda, and N. Kawakami, Collective Excitations and Nonequilibrium Phase Transition in Dissipative Fermionic Superfluids, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 055301 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Z. Ren, D. Liu, E. Zhao, C. He, K. K. Pak, J. Li, and G.-B. Jo, Chiral control of quantum states in non-Hermitian spin–orbit- coupled fermions, Nat. Phys.18, 385 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Liang, D

    Q. Liang, D. Xie, Z. Dong, H. Li, H. Li, B. Gadway, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Dynamic Signatures of Non-Hermitian Skin Ef- fect and Topology in Ultracold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 070401 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Tsuno, S

    T. Tsuno, S. Taie, Y . Takasu, K. Yamashita, T. Ozawa, and Y . Takahashi, Gain engineering and topological atom laser in synthetic dimensions, arXiv:2404.13769

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    E. Zhao, Z. Wang, C. He, T. F. J. Poon, K. K. Pak, Y .-J. Liu, P. Ren, X.-J. Liu, and G.-B. Jo, Two-dimensional non- Hermitian skin effect in an ultracold Fermi gas, Nature637, 565 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Yamamoto, M

    K. Yamamoto, M. Nakagawa, K. Adachi, K. Takasan, M. Ueda, and N. Kawakami, Theory of Non-Hermitian Fermionic Superfluidity with a Complex-Valued Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 123601 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Hamazaki, K

    R. Hamazaki, K. Kawabata, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian Many-Body Localization, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 090603 (2019)

    2019

  38. [46]

    Ashida, S

    Y . Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Ueda, Quantum critical be- havior influenced by measurement backaction in ultracold gases, Phys. Rev. A94, 053615 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Ashida, S

    Y . Ashida, S. Furukawa, and M. Ueda, Parity-time-symmetric quantum critical phenomena, Nat. Commun.8, 15791 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    Xu and S

    Z. Xu and S. Chen, Topological Bose-Mott insulators in one- dimensional non-Hermitian superlattices, Phys. Rev. B102, 035153 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    Zhang, Y .-L

    D.-W. Zhang, Y .-L. Chen, G.-Q. Zhang, L.-J. Lang, Z. Li, and S.-L. Zhu, Skin superfluid, topological Mott insulators, and asymmetric dynamics in an interacting non-Hermitian Aubry- Andr´e-Harper model, Phys. Rev. B101, 235150 (2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    T. Liu, J. J. He, T. Yoshida, Z.-L. Xiang, and F. Nori, Non- Hermitian topological Mott insulators in one-dimensional fermionic superlattices, Phys. Rev. B102, 235151 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    Yamamoto, M

    K. Yamamoto, M. Nakagawa, M. Tezuka, M. Ueda, and N. Kawakami, Universal properties of dissipative Tomonaga- Luttinger liquids: Case study of a non-Hermitian XXZ spin chain, Phys. Rev. B105, 205125 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Yamamoto and N

    K. Yamamoto and N. Kawakami, Universal description of dis- sipative Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids withSU(N)spin sym- metry: Exact spectrum and critical exponents, Phys. Rev. B 107, 045110 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and S. Ryu, Many-body topology of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. B105, 165137 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Yoshida, S.-B

    T. Yoshida, S.-B. Zhang, T. Neupert, and N. Kawakami, Non- Hermitian Mott Skin Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 076502 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    B. H. Kim, J.-H. Han, and M. J. Park, Collective non- Hermitian skin effect: point-gap topology and the doublon- holon excitations in non-reciprocal many-body systems, Com- mun. Phys.7, 73 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Hanai, A

    R. Hanai, A. Edelman, Y . Ohashi, and P. B. Littlewood, Non- Hermitian Phase Transition from a Polariton Bose-Einstein Condensate to a Photon Laser, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 185301 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Gopalakrishnan and M

    S. Gopalakrishnan and M. J. Gullans, Entanglement and Pu- rification Transitions in Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 170503 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    K. Yang, S. C. Morampudi, and E. J. Bergholtz, Exceptional Spin Liquids from Couplings to the Environment, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 077201 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    Y . Sun, T. Shi, Z. Liu, Z. Zhang, L. Xiao, S. Jia, and Y . Hu, Fractional Quantum Zeno Effect Emerging from Non- Hermitian Physics, Phys. Rev. X13, 031009 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    X.-J. Yu, Z. Pan, L. Xu, and Z.-X. Li, Non-Hermitian Strongly Interacting Dirac Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 116503 (2024)

    2024

  53. [61]

    Takemori, K

    S. Takemori, K. Yamamoto, and A. Koga, Spin- depairing-induced exceptional fermionic superfluidity, arXiv:2504.19525 ()

  54. [62]

    Takemori, K

    S. Takemori, K. Yamamoto, and A. Koga, Dimensional- ity effect on exceptional fermionic superfluidity with spin- dependent asymmetric hopping, arXiv:2509.17414 ()

  55. [63]

    Yamamoto, M

    K. Yamamoto, M. Nakagawa, and N. Kawakami, Correla- tion versus dissipation in a non-Hermitian Anderson impurity model, Phys. Rev. B111, 125157 (2025)

    2025

  56. [64]

    A. V . Gorshkov, M. Hermele, V . Gurarie, C. Xu, P. S. Julienne, J. Ye, P. Zoller, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and A. Rey, Two- orbital SU (N) magnetism with ultracold alkaline-earth atoms, Nat. Phys.6, 289 (2010)

    2010

  57. [65]

    Foss-Feig, M

    M. Foss-Feig, M. Hermele, and A. M. Rey, Probing the Kondo lattice model with alkaline-earth-metal atoms, Phys. Rev. A 81, 051603 (2010)

    2010

  58. [66]

    Foss-Feig, M

    M. Foss-Feig, M. Hermele, V . Gurarie, and A. M. Rey, Heavy fermions in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. A82, 053624 (2010)

    2010

  59. [67]

    Bauer, C

    J. Bauer, C. Salomon, and E. Demler, Realizing a Kondo- Correlated State with Ultracold Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 215304 (2013)

    2013

  60. [68]

    Isaev and A

    L. Isaev and A. M. Rey, Heavy-Fermion Valence-Bond Liq- uids in Ultracold Atoms: Cooperation of the Kondo Effect and Geometric Frustration, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 165302 (2015)

    2015

  61. [69]

    Nakagawa and N

    M. Nakagawa and N. Kawakami, Laser-Induced Kondo Effect 17 in Ultracold Alkaline-Earth Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 165303 (2015)

    2015

  62. [70]

    Nishida, Transport measurement of the orbital Kondo effect with ultracold atoms, Phys

    Y . Nishida, Transport measurement of the orbital Kondo effect with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A93, 011606 (2016)

    2016

  63. [71]

    Zhang, D

    R. Zhang, D. Zhang, Y . Cheng, W. Chen, P. Zhang, and H. Zhai, Kondo effect in alkaline-earth-metal atomic gases with confinement-induced resonances, Phys. Rev. A93, 043601 (2016)

    2016

  64. [72]

    Kan ´asz-Nagy, Y

    M. Kan ´asz-Nagy, Y . Ashida, T. Shi, C. P. Moca, T. N. Ikeda, S. F¨olling, J. I. Cirac, G. Zar´and, and E. A. Demler, Exploring the anisotropic Kondo model in and out of equilibrium with alkaline-earth atoms, Phys. Rev. B97, 155156 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Vanhoecke and M

    M. Vanhoecke and M. Schir `o, Diagrammatic Monte Carlo for dissipative quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B109, 125125 (2024)

    2024

  66. [74]

    Vanhoecke and M

    M. Vanhoecke and M. Schir ´o, Kondo-zeno crossover in the dynamics of a monitored quantum dot, arXiv:2405.17348

    arXiv

  67. [75]

    Stefanini, Y .-F

    M. Stefanini, Y .-F. Qu, T. Esslinger, S. Gopalakrishnan, E. Demler, and J. Marino, Dissipative realization of Kondo models, Commun. Phys.8, 1 (2025)

    2025

  68. [76]

    Vanhoecke, N

    M. Vanhoecke, N. Tsuji, and M. Schir `o, Dissipative Kondo physics in the Anderson Impurity Model with two-body losses, arXiv:2506.22302

    arXiv

  69. [77]

    Werner, M

    D. Werner, M. Vanhoecke, M. Schir `o, and E. Arrigoni, Nonequilibrium transport through an interacting monitored quantum dot, arXiv:2507.20779

  70. [78]

    Y .-F. Qu, M. Stefanini, T. Shi, T. Esslinger, S. Gopalakrishnan, J. Marino, and E. Demler, Variational approach to the dynam- ics of dissipative quantum impurity models, Phys. Rev. B111, 155113 (2025)

    2025

  71. [79]

    Hasegawa, M

    M. Hasegawa, M. Nakagawa, and K. Saito, Kondo effect in a quantum dot under continuous quantum measurement, arXiv:2111.07771

    arXiv

  72. [80]

    S. Han, D. J. Schultz, and Y . B. Kim, Complex fixed points of the non-Hermitian Kondo model in a Luttinger liquid, Phys. Rev. B107, 235153 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    V . M. Kulkarni and N. Vidhyadhiraja, Anderson impurities in edge states with nonlinear and dissipative perturbations, sub- mitted to Scipost Phys

  74. [82]

    V . M. Kulkarni, Light-driven bound state of interacting impu- rities in a dirac-like bath, arXiv:2505.17811

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Kattel, P

    P. Kattel, P. R. Pasnoori, J. H. Pixley, and N. Andrei, Spin chain with non-HermitianPT-symmetric boundary cou- plings: Exact solution, dissipative Kondo effect, and phase transitions on the edge, Phys. Rev. B111, 224407 (2025)

    2025

  76. [84]

    J. A. S. Lourenc ¸o, R. L. Eneias, and R. G. Pereira, Kondo effect in aPT-symmetric non-hermitian hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. B98, 085126 (2018)

    2018

  77. [85]

    V . M. Kulkarni, A. Gupta, and N. S. Vidhyadhiraja, Kondo ef- fect in a non-HermitianPT-symmetric Anderson model with Rashba spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B106, 075113 (2022)

    2022

  78. [86]

    Nakagawa, N

    M. Nakagawa, N. Kawakami, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian Kondo Effect in Ultracold Alkaline-Earth Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 203001 (2018)

    2018

  79. [87]

    Kattel, A

    P. Kattel, A. Zhakenov, P. R. Pasnoori, P. Azaria, and N. An- drei, Dissipation driven phase transition in the non-hermitian kondo model, Phys. Rev. B111, L201106 (2025)

    2025

  80. [88]

    Chen, Critical behavior of non-Hermitian Kondo effect in a pseudogap system, Phys

    J. Chen, Critical behavior of non-Hermitian Kondo effect in a pseudogap system, Phys. Rev. B111, 045124 (2025)

    2025

  81. [89]

    P. C. Burke and A. K. Mitchell, Non-Hermitian numerical renormalization group: Solution of the non-Hermitian Kondo model, arXiv:2504.07019

  82. [90]

    We note that complex hybridization in the NH-AIM has been also studied in a specialPT-symmetric setup with Rashba spin-orbit couplings in Ref. [85]

  83. [91]

    This fact is reminiscent of the behavior of the superfluid order parameter in the NH BCS theory [44, 120, 121]

  84. [92]

    We note that the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation of the NH- AIM with complexUhas been employed to obtain the NH Kondo model in Ref. [88]

  85. [93]

    Wiegmann, Towards an exact solution of the Anderson model, Phys

    P. Wiegmann, Towards an exact solution of the Anderson model, Phys. Lett. A80, 163 (1980)

    1980

  86. [94]

    Kawakami and A

    N. Kawakami and A. Okiji, Exact expression of the ground- state energy for the symmetric Anderson model, Phys. Lett. A 86, 483 (1981)

    1981

  87. [95]

    Kawakami and A

    N. Kawakami and A. Okiji, Ground State of Anderson Hamil- tonian, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.51, 1145 (1982)

    1982

  88. [96]

    Kawakami and A

    N. Kawakami and A. Okiji, Ground State of Asymmetric An- derson Hamiltonian, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.51, 2043 (1982)

  89. [97]

    Okiji and N

    A. Okiji and N. Kawakami, Magnetic properties of Anderson model at zero temperature, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.51, 3192 (1982)

    1982

  90. [98]

    Okiji and N

    A. Okiji and N. Kawakami, Exact expression of magnetic sus- ceptibility for the Anderson model, Solid State Commun.43, 365 (1982)

    1982

  91. [99]

    Wiegmann and A

    P. Wiegmann and A. Tsvelick, Exact solution of the Anderson model: I, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.16, 2281 (1983)

    1983

  92. [100]

    Tsvelick and P

    A. Tsvelick and P. Wiegmann, Exact solution of the Anderson model. II. Thermodynamic properties at finite temperatures, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.16, 2321 (1983)

    1983

  93. [101]

    Schlottmann, Bethe-Ansatz Solution of the Anderson Model of a Magnetic Impurity with Orbital Degeneracy, Phys

    P. Schlottmann, Bethe-Ansatz Solution of the Anderson Model of a Magnetic Impurity with Orbital Degeneracy, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1697 (1983)

    1983

  94. [102]

    Kawakami and A

    N. Kawakami and A. Okiji, Transport properties of the Ander- son model at low temperatures, Phys. Lett.A118, 301 (1986)

    1986

  95. [103]

    Schlottmann, Some exact results for dilute mixed-valent and heavy-fermion systems, Phys

    P. Schlottmann, Some exact results for dilute mixed-valent and heavy-fermion systems, Phys. Rep.181, 1 (1989)

    1989

  96. [105]

    Shibata and H

    N. Shibata and H. Katsura, Dissipative quantum Ising chain as a non-Hermitian Ashkin-Teller model, Phys. Rev. B99, 224432 (2019)

    2019

  97. [106]

    Nakagawa, N

    M. Nakagawa, N. Kawakami, and M. Ueda, Exact Liouvillian Spectrum of a One-Dimensional Dissipative Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 110404 (2021)

    2021

  98. [107]

    Bu ˇca, C

    B. Bu ˇca, C. Booker, M. Medenjak, and D. Jaksch, Bethe ansatz approach for dissipation: exact solutions of quantum many-body dynamics under loss, New J. Phys.22, 123040 (2020)

    2020

  99. [108]

    L. Mao, Y . Hao, and L. Pan, Non-Hermitian skin effect in a one-dimensional interacting Bose gas, Phys. Rev. A107, 043315 (2023)

    2023

  100. [109]

    March ´e, H

    A. March ´e, H. Yoshida, A. Nardin, H. Katsura, and L. Mazza, Universality and two-body losses: Lessons from the effective non-Hermitian dynamics of two particles, Phys. Rev. A110, 033321 (2024)

    2024

  101. [110]

    Then, the complex hybridization is given by ˜∆ = ˜V 2/2, and the pa- rameters in the Hamiltonian should be translated to correctly reflect their dimensions

    When linearizing the energy dispersion, we take the energy unit to bev F = 1, wherev F is the Fermi velocity. Then, the complex hybridization is given by ˜∆ = ˜V 2/2, and the pa- rameters in the Hamiltonian should be translated to correctly reflect their dimensions

  102. [111]

    C. N. Yang, Some Exact Results for the Many-Body Problem in one Dimension with Repulsive Delta-Function Interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 1312 (1967)

    1967

  103. [112]

    Fukui and N

    T. Fukui and N. Kawakami, Breakdown of the Mott insulator: Exact solution of an asymmetric Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B58, 16051 (1998)

    1998

  104. [113]

    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka,Quantum theory of many- 18 particle systems(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1971)

    1971

  105. [114]

    C. J. Coveney and D. P. Tew, Non-Hermitian Green’s function theory withN-body interactions: the coupled-cluster similar- ity transformation, arXiv:2503.06586

  106. [115]

    Yamamoto and R

    K. Yamamoto and R. Hamazaki, Localization properties in disordered quantum many-body dynamics under continuous measurement, Phys. Rev. B107, L220201 (2023)

    2023

  107. [116]

    Yamamoto and R

    K. Yamamoto and R. Hamazaki, Measurement-Induced Crossover of Quantum Jump Statistics in Postselection-Free Many-Body Dynamics, arXiv:2503.02418

    arXiv

  108. [117]

    Z. Gong, Y . Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological Phases of Non- Hermitian Systems, Phys. Rev. X8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  109. [118]

    (B9) and (B10) are reminiscent of the super- fluid order parameters in the NH BCS theory [44, 120, 121], and we indeed see some similarities in the behavior between Eqs

    We note that Eqs. (B9) and (B10) are reminiscent of the super- fluid order parameters in the NH BCS theory [44, 120, 121], and we indeed see some similarities in the behavior between Eqs. (B9) and (B10) and superfluid gaps in the phase transition as discussed in Sec. II C

  110. [119]

    Such a structure is different from the corresponding SCE in the Hermitian AIM [14] and the NH-AIM with one-body loss [63]

  111. [120]

    Takemori, K

    S. Takemori, K. Yamamoto, and A. Koga, Theory of non- Hermitian fermionic superfluidity on a honeycomb lattice: In- terplay between exceptional manifolds and Van Hove singu- larity, Phys. Rev. B109, L060501 (2024)

    2024

  112. [121]

    Takemori, K

    S. Takemori, K. Yamamoto, and A. Koga, Phase diagram of non-Hermitian BCS superfluids in a dissipative asymmetric Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B110, 184518 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.