Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Local-to-Global Entanglement Dynamics by Periodically Driving Impurities

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Periodically driving a single impurity in a 1D fermionic chain produces a sharp entanglement transition at a critical period T* = π, separating slow logarithmic growth from linear heating.

desk verdict Real phenomenon and clean numerics, but the exact analytic proof for the harmonic drive has a sign error that invalidates it as written, and the abstract promises SSH results that are not in the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.20908 v2 pith:MW2W3ZZA submitted 2025-10-23 quant-ph cond-mat.str-el

Zhi-Xing Lin , Abhinav Prem , Shinsei Ryu , Bastien Lapierre This is my paper
classification quant-phcond-mat.str-el
keywords entanglemententropyFloquetdrivelocalimpuritytransitionquasienergyfoldingrainbowstateaverageenergyoperatorXXZchain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that purely local periodic driving of a two-site impurity in an otherwise uniform one-dimensional fermionic chain can flip the entire system between two dynamical regimes: below a critical driving period T* = π, the drive behaves like a local quantum quench and entanglement grows only logarithmically; above T*, the drive effectively couples distant sites and entanglement grows linearly in time, signaling global heating. In the noninteracting limit, this transition is traced exactly to the closure of the single-particle Floquet gap when quasienergies fold at the bandwidth. The authors introduce the 'average energy' operator as a many-body diagnostic that stays local in the non-heating phase and develops long-range rainbow couplings in the heating phase. Matrix-product-state simulations show that the non-heating phase survives weak interactions for numerically accessible timescales, suggesting local Floquet engineering as a route to emergent bulk dynamics.

What carries the argument

The mirror operator σ = i∑(c†_j c_{2L+1−j} − h.c.), which generates the unitary equivalence H(t) = e^{iπt/T σ} H(0) e^{−iπt/T σ}, converts the local drive into an exact Floquet Hamiltonian with a competition between hopping and a rainbow term (π/T)(σ − N); the gap of this operator closes at T = π, setting the transition. The auxiliary object carrying the diagnostic is the average energy operator Θ(T), whose locality versus non-locality marks the two phases.

What would settle it

Measure the growth of bipartite entanglement for a two-step drive on a long chain at periods just above and below π; if the transition point differs from the single-particle bandwidth, or if the entanglement growth remains subextensive at T > π for some drive protocol, the proposed mechanism fails. More directly, compute the single-particle Floquet spectrum and check whether the gap closes exactly at T=π for all drive protocols.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a harmonic drive with λ(t)=cos(2πt/T), the time-dependent Hamiltonian is unitarily related to its initial value by the mirror operator σ, giving an exact rotating-frame Floquet Hamiltonian HF = H(0) + (π/T)(σ − N). This Hamiltonian has a dimerized ('rainbow') ground state as long as the single-particle gap remains open, i.e. for T < π; at T = π the gap closes, and for T > π long-range couplings dominate. Consequently, the entanglement entropy grows subextensively (logarithmically, with revivals) below T*, and linearly (volume law) above. The transition is therefore an equilibrium-like gap-closure transition at the level of the Floquet Hamiltonian, and it is mirrored by a localization–del

Load-bearing premise

The analytic derivation of the critical period relies on the exact rotating-frame algebra for the harmonic drive, H(t)=e^{iπt/Tσ}H(0)e^{-iπt/Tσ}; for drives without this algebraic structure, such as the two-step square drive, the transition is shown only numerically, so the universality of T* = π as the single-particle bandwidth is not proven analytically for generic local drives.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the noninteracting nearest-neighbor chain, entanglement entropy grows logarithmically in time and space below T*=π and linearly above, with the transition sharp at the single-particle bandwidth.
  • The exact Floquet Hamiltonian predicts a dimerized rainbow ground state below T*, and the dynamics below T* is adiabatically connected to the infinite-frequency local-quench limit.
  • The average energy operator remains local in the non-heating phase and develops non-local rainbow couplings above T*, providing a many-body observable that diagnoses the transition without gauge ambiguity.
  • Weak interactions do not destroy the non-heating phase up to several hundred Floquet cycles, with revival periods that follow the Bethe-ansatz quasiparticle velocity of the XXZ chain.
  • The transition is distinct from prethermalization: it persists for a continuous range of frequencies far from the high-frequency regime and without disorder.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is universal for local Floquet drives in free-fermion chains, the same threshold T*=π should appear for any local modulation; the analytic proof here relies on the harmonic-drive algebra, so this could be tested numerically for other drive shapes.
  • The average-energy localization transition suggests a possible connection to many-body energy localization transitions; one could probe it by measuring energy absorption across the chain rather than bipartite entanglement.
  • Because the setup is unitary, the subextensive phase is not an entanglement phase transition in the monitored-circuit sense; nevertheless, the non-Hermitian extension in the supplemental material indicates the transition also controls purification dynamics, which may be probed in post-selected experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the entanglement dynamics of a 1D fermionic/XXZ chain with a locally, periodically driven two-site impurity. The central claim is a sharp dynamical transition at a critical period T*=π (set by the single-particle bandwidth) in the noninteracting limit: for T<T* the entanglement entropy grows subextensively (logarithmic, local-quench-like), while for T>T* it grows linearly (volume-law, heating). The authors derive an exact Floquet Hamiltonian H_F = H(0) + (π/T)(σ−N) for a harmonic drive λ(t)=cos(2πt/T), attribute the transition to a single-particle gap closure at T=π, and support this with ED/MPS numerics for the 2-step drive in the main text and a harmonically driven chain in the SM. They also introduce an 'average energy' (Kato) operator as a many-body diagnostic, show that the non-heating phase is adiabatically connected to infinite frequency, and provide MPS simulations suggesting that the non-heating regime survives weak interactions over accessible timescales. The abstract additionally promises an SSH-chain generalization with multiple 0- and π-gap foldings, but this content is absent from the main text and the Supplemental Material provided.

Significance. If the central result holds, this is a clean and potentially influential example of a local Floquet drive producing a sharp bulk entanglement transition whose position is set exactly (T*=π) by quasienergy folding in the noninteracting limit. The claim that a strictly local drive can act as a non-local perturbation above T* and generate volume-law entanglement is a striking extension of known local-quench physics, and the proposed average-energy (Kato) diagnostic connects to recent geometric Floquet theory. The paper clearly benefits from strong supporting numerics and, in the interacting case, the study is honest about being restricted to numerically accessible timescales. However, the exact analytic derivation of the Floquet Hamiltonian—the load-bearing step for the noninteracting T*=π claim—has a sign inconsistency with the stated definitions in the SM, and the SSH results advertised in the abstract are missing entirely. These issues prevent acceptance in the present form.

major comments (3)
  1. [SM Appendix A, Eqs. (A4)-(A6); main text Eq. (4)] The rotating-frame derivation of H_F = H(0)+(π/T)(σ−N) appears internally inconsistent with the stated definitions. For λ(t)=cos(2πt/T), at t=T/4, λ=0, Eq. (3) gives H_imp(T/4)=(1/2)(n_L−n_{L+1}). With σ=i(c†_L c_{L+1}−c†_{L+1} c_L), the SM's own algebra [σ,Γ]=2iΩ gives e^{iπσ/4}Γe^{−iπσ/4}=−Ω. Thus rotating H_imp(0)=(1/2)Γ yields −(1/2)Ω, opposite to the advertised H_imp(T/4). Unless the definitions are corrected, Eq. (4) is not the Floquet Hamiltonian of Eqs. (2)-(3), and the analytic T*=π proof is unsupported.
  2. [Abstract; main text; Outlook] The abstract promises a 'gapped Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) chain, whose two-band structure yields a richer phase diagram with multiple area-to-volume-law transitions' and 'a sequence of foldings at both 0- and π-gaps.' No SSH model, two-band calculation, or sequence of foldings appears anywhere in the main text or the attached Supplemental Material. This is not a minor omission: the abstract's stated scope and a promised demonstration of universality are absent. The manuscript should either add the SSH results or revise the abstract to describe only the NN-chain results.
  3. [Main text, 'Heating as gap closure'; Figs. 2-4] The claimed universality of T*=π for generic local drives is not established. For the 2-step square drive (Figs. 2, 3, S3-S6), the transition is shown only numerically; the exact rotating-frame argument applies only to the harmonic drive (and is, as noted, currently inconsistent). The statement 'the transition occurs at the same critical period T*=π for a harmonic drive (see SM)' implies agreement between two drives, but the analytic mechanism is given only for the harmonic case. If the authors intend to claim a general single-particle-bandwidth transition, they should supply an argument for the 2-step drive, or clearly label the general claim as a conjecture supported by numerics.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Main text, Eq. (3)] The notation λ(t) is used both as the time-dependent parameter in the conformal-defect matrix and as the eigenvalue parameter in Appendix A (Eq. A10, κ±); this overloaded notation is confusing and should be disambiguated.
  2. [SM Appendix A, Eq. (A13)] The eigenvector expression contains a normalization N(E) that is never explicitly defined; a formula or reference is needed to make the expression usable.
  3. [Main text, Fig. 3; SM Appendix C] The paper says the average-energy spectrum is computed for the 2-step drive, but the analytic calculation (SM C2) is only for the harmonic drive. The relationship between the analytic harmonic-drive result and the numerical 2-step result should be clarified, particularly whether the absence of the exact rotating frame affects the interpretation of Fig. 3.
  4. [Main text, MPS simulations] The claim that the non-heating phase 'survives weak interactions over numerically accessible timescales' is appropriately cautious, but the text should state explicitly (as in the figure caption) the total simulated time t_max in terms of L and T so that the reader can assess how long the linear-growth regime would need to be delayed in order to be ruled out.
  5. [Main text, 'Energy localization transition'] The sentence 'the non-local structure of the Floquet Hamiltonian Eq. (4) reflects that the ground state of H_F does not have a well-defined physical meaning' is unclear; all Floquet Hamiltonians have gauge-dependent ground states, and the distinction being drawn should be stated more precisely.
  6. [Throughout] Several citations are made to the SM for derivations that are essential to the main claims (e.g., the exact rotating frame, the SW analysis, and the average-energy calculation). For a Letter this is acceptable, but the main-text statements should be internally consistent with the SM equations, which is the substance of Major Comment 1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: T* = pi is derived from Floquet gap closure, not from fitted data.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain: harmonic drive H(t), micromotion P(t) = exp(i pi t/T (sigma - N)), exact Floquet Hamiltonian H_F = H(0) + (pi/T)(sigma - N), then single-particle gap closure at T = pi, then local-quench vs heating entanglement growth. The critical period is obtained from a spectral condition, not by fitting the entanglement data, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The 2-step drive and interacting MPS results are numerical benchmarks rather than circular inputs. Self-citations (Refs. 53, 54, 60, 61) appear only as background; the load-bearing rotating-frame construction and Kato/average-energy formalism cite Refs. 23 and 71, which are external. Two non-circular concerns are noted per the review rule: (1) the abstract promises a gapped SSH multi-transition analysis, but no SSH section appears in the main text or SM, so that claim is presently unsupported; (2) the harmonic-drive identity H(t) = exp(i pi t/T sigma) H(0) exp(-i pi t/T sigma) appears algebraically inconsistent with the stated definitions (at t = T/4 the rotation of H_imp(0) = (1/2)Gamma gives -(1/2)Omega while Eq. A3 gives +(1/2)Omega), which would undermine the analytic derivation of Eq. (4) as written. These are correctness/derivation-support issues, not circularity: the claimed result is not equivalent to its inputs by construction. Therefore score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the exact solvability of the harmonic-drive conformal defect (rotating-frame equivalence), the choice of the half-filling ground state as initial state, the applicability of the average-energy diagnostic, and the Calabrese-Cardy local-quench description. No fitted parameters are introduced; T*=π is derived. The interacting-case conclusions rely on finite-time MPS, which is a numerical assumption.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Jordan-Wigner transformation maps the XXZ chain at Δ=0 to free fermions.
    Used in Eq. (2) to express the model as a free-fermion Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption For the harmonic drive λ(t)=cos(2πt/T), H(t) is unitarily related to H(0) via a rotation generated by the mirror operator σ, enabling an exact Floquet Hamiltonian.
    Appendix A derives H_F=H(0)+(π/T)(σ−N) from this algebraic structure; this is the basis for the T*=π transition. It holds for this specific impurity form, not for a generic drive.
  • domain assumption The initial state is the ground state of the uniform chain at half-filling.
    Stated at the start of 'Driven impurity' and used in all simulations.
  • domain assumption The average-energy (Kato) operator formalism of Ref. [71] provides a unique, unambiguous ground-state diagnostic for Floquet systems.
    Used to define Θ(T) in Eq. (5) and to identify adiabatic continuity breaking; the formalism is taken as external framework.
  • domain assumption The Calabrese-Cardy local quench picture describes the subextensive entanglement growth and revival period in the non-heating phase.
    Appendix D compares revival period to the Bethe-ansatz quasiparticle velocity v=π√(1−Δ²)/(2 arccos Δ).
  • domain assumption TEBD/MPS simulations with the stated bond dimensions accurately capture the entanglement dynamics over the simulated timescales.
    Fig. 4 and SM; no truncation-error or convergence analysis is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Local-to-Global Entanglement Dynamics by Periodically Driving Impurities." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MW2W3ZZA

@misc{pith2026251020908,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Local-to-Global Entanglement Dynamics by Periodically Driving Impurities},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MW2W3ZZA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.20908}
}
abstract

We study the entanglement dynamics of one-dimensional fermionic chains subject to a local Floquet drive of a two-site impurity, and uncover a sharp transition in the entanglement dynamics set by the driving period $T$. For large periods, the entanglement entropy (EE) grows linearly in time, signaling a heating phase with volume-law entanglement; below a critical period $T_\ast$, the EE instead grows subextensively, characteristic of a local quantum quench. We establish this dichotomy in two complementary settings: a gapless nearest-neighbor hopping chain, where a single transition separates logarithmic from volume-law growth, and a gapped Su-Schrieffer-Heeger (SSH) chain, whose two-band structure yields a richer phase diagram with multiple area-to-volume-law transitions. In the noninteracting limit, we trace these transitions analytically to quasienergy folding in the single-particle Floquet spectrum: a single $\pi$-gap closure for the NN chain, and a sequence of foldings at both 0- and $\pi$-gaps for the SSH chain, yielding the alternating pattern of heating and non-heating phases. We further show that the so-called ``average energy" operator furnishes a many-body diagnostic of the transition, remaining local in the non-heating phase but developing non-local couplings in the heating phase. For the gapless chain, using extensive matrix-product-state simulations, we demonstrate that the non-heating phase and its subextensive entanglement growth survive weak interactions over numerically accessible timescales. Our results establish local Floquet engineering as a route to emergent bulk phenomena, offering a new perspective on energy localization and thermalization in driven many-body systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.20908 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Setup: We consider a periodically driven two-site [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The entanglement phases of the 2-step driven impu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Entanglement evolution of the driven defect in an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exactly solvable non-unitary conformal interfaces in unitary CFTs

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    An SL(2,C)-parametrized family of exactly solvable non-unitary conformal interfaces is constructed on the lattice in unitary CFTs via analytic continuation, leading to a non-unitary Cardy condition and logarithmic ent...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

105 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Infrared catastrophe in fermi gases with local scattering potentials, Phys. Rev. Lett.18, 1049 (1967)

    1967

  2. [2]

    Vojta, Impurity quantum phase transitions, Philo- sophical Magazine86, 1807 (2006)

    M. Vojta, Impurity quantum phase transitions, Philo- sophical Magazine86, 1807 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    Bayat, Scaling of tripartite entanglement at impurity quantum phase transitions, Phys

    A. Bayat, Scaling of tripartite entanglement at impurity quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 036102 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Rancati, N

    A. Rancati, N. Pournaghavi, M. F. Islam, A. Debernardi, and C. M. Canali, Impurity-induced topological phase transitions in cd 3as2 and na 3Bi dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B102, 195110 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Huang, R

    H. Huang, R. Drost, J. Senkpiel, C. Padurariu, B. Kubala, A. L. Yeyati, J. C. Cuevas, J. Ankerhold, K. Kern, and C. R. Ast, Quantum phase transitions and the role of impurity-substrate hybridization in yu-shiba- rusinov states, Communications Physics3, 199 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Peschel, Entanglement entropy with interface defects, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General38, 4327 (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0502034 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    I. Peschel, Entanglement entropy with interface defects, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General38, 4327 (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0502034 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    J. Zhao, I. Peschel, and X. Wang, Critical entanglement ofxxzheisenberg chains with defects, Phys. Rev. B73, 024417 (2006)

    2006

  8. [8]

    Igl´ oi, Z

    F. Igl´ oi, Z. Szatm´ ari, and Y.-C. Lin, Entanglement en- tropy with localized and extended interface defects, Phys. Rev. B80, 024405 (2009)

    2009

Show all 105 references
  1. [9]

    Sakai and Y

    K. Sakai and Y. Satoh, Entanglement through conformal interfaces, Journal of High Energy Physics2008, 001–001 (2008)

    2008

  2. [10]

    Klich and L

    I. Klich and L. Levitov, Quantum noise as an entangle- ment meter, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 100502 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    Calabrese, M

    P. Calabrese, M. Mintchev, and E. Vicari, Entanglement entropy of one-dimensional gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 020601 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Calabrese, M

    P. Calabrese, M. Mintchev, and E. Vicari, Entanglement entropy of quantum wire junctions, Journal of Physics A Mathematical General45, 105206 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Peschel and V

    I. Peschel and V. Eisler, Exact results for the entangle- ment across defects in critical chains, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical45, 155301 (2012). 6

    2012

  6. [14]

    Gutperle and J

    M. Gutperle and J. D. Miller, Entanglement entropy at cft junctions, Phys. Rev. D95, 106008 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Kruthoff, R

    J. Kruthoff, R. Mahajan, and C. Murdia, Free fermion en- tanglement with a semitransparent interface: the effect of graybody factors on entanglement islands, SciPost Phys. 11, 063 (2021)

    2021

  8. [16]

    Rogerson, F

    D. Rogerson, F. Pollmann, and A. Roy, Entanglement entropy and negativity in the Ising model with defects, Journal of High Energy Physics2022, 165 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    Roy and H

    A. Roy and H. Saleur, Entanglement entropy in the ising model with topological defects, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 090603 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Eisler and I

    V. Eisler and I. Peschel, Evolution of entanglement after a local quench, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007, 06005 (2007)

    2007

  11. [19]

    H. F. Song, C. Flindt, S. Rachel, I. Klich, and K. Le Hur, Entanglement entropy from charge statistics: Exact rela- tions for noninteracting many-body systems, Phys. Rev. B83, 161408 (2011)

    2011

  12. [20]

    Eisler and I

    V. Eisler and I. Peschel, On entanglement evolution across defects in critical chains, EPL (Europhysics Let- ters)99, 20001 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    X. Wen, Y. Wang, and S. Ryu, Entanglement evolution across a conformal interface, Journal of Physics A: Math- ematical and Theoretical51, 195004 (2018)

    2018

  14. [22]

    Gruber and V

    M. Gruber and V. Eisler, Time evolution of entangle- ment negativity across a defect, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical53, 205301 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Gamayun, A

    O. Gamayun, A. Slobodeniuk, J.-S. Caux, and O. Ly- chkovskiy, Nonequilibrium phase transition in transport through a driven quantum point contact, Phys. Rev. B 103, L041405 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Capizzi, S

    L. Capizzi, S. Scopa, F. Rottoli, and P. Calabrese, Do- main wall melting across a defect, Europhysics Letters 141, 31002 (2023)

    2023

  17. [25]

    Capizzi and V

    L. Capizzi and V. Eisler, Entanglement evolution after a global quench across a conformal defect, SciPost Phys. 14, 070 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    M. Saha, M. Kulkarni, and A. Dhar, Generalized hydro- dynamic description of the page curve–like dynamics of a freely expanding fermionic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 230402 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Collura and P

    M. Collura and P. Calabrese, Entanglement evolution across defects in critical anisotropic heisenberg chains, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical46, 175001 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Vasseur, K

    R. Vasseur, K. Trinh, S. Haas, and H. Saleur, Crossover physics in the nonequilibrium dynamics of quenched quantum impurity systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 240601 (2013)

    2013

  21. [29]

    D. M. Kennes, V. Meden, and R. Vasseur, Universal quench dynamics of interacting quantum impurity sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B90, 115101 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    Schir´ o and A

    M. Schir´ o and A. Mitra, Transport across an impurity in one-dimensional quantum liquids far from equilibrium, Phys. Rev. B91, 235126 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Ljubotina, S

    M. Ljubotina, S. Sotiriadis, and T. Prosen, Non- equilibrium quantum transport in presence of a defect: the non-interacting case, SciPost Phys.6, 004 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Gamayun, O

    O. Gamayun, O. Lychkovskiy, and J.-S. Caux, Fredholm determinants, full counting statistics and Loschmidt echo for domain wall profiles in one-dimensional free fermionic chains, SciPost Phys.8, 036 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    De Luca and A

    A. De Luca and A. Bastianello, Entanglement front gen- erated by an impurity traveling in an isolated many-body quantum system, Phys. Rev. B101, 085139 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Mitra, Quantum Quench Dynamics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics9, 245 (2018)

    A. Mitra, Quantum Quench Dynamics, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics9, 245 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Oka and S

    T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet Engineering of Quan- tum Materials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 387 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Khemani, R

    V. Khemani, R. Moessner, and S. L. Sondhi, A Brief His- tory of Time Crystals, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1910.10745 (2019), arXiv:1910.10745 [cond-mat.str-el]

    1910 arXiv

  29. [37]

    D. V. Else, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, and N. Y. Yao, Dis- crete Time Crystals, Annual Review of Condensed Mat- ter Physics11, 467 (2020)

    2020

  30. [38]

    Harper, R

    F. Harper, R. Roy, M. S. Rudner, and S. L. Sondhi, Topology and Broken Symmetry in Floquet Systems, An- nual Review of Condensed Matter Physics11, 345 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engi- neering and non-equilibrium dynamics in floquet topo- logical insulators, Nature reviews physics2, 229 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    D’Alessio and M

    L. D’Alessio and M. Rigol, Long-time behavior of isolated periodically driven interacting lattice systems, Phys. Rev. X4, 041048 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    Lazarides, A

    A. Lazarides, A. Das, and R. Moessner, Equilibrium states of generic quantum systems subject to periodic driving, Phys. Rev. E90, 012110 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    T. N. Ikeda and A. Polkovnikov, Fermi’s golden rule for heating in strongly driven floquet systems, Phys. Rev. B 104, 134308 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Rakcheev and A

    A. Rakcheev and A. M. L¨ auchli, Estimating heating times in periodically driven quantum many-body sys- tems via avoided crossing spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 043174 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Prosen and E

    T. Prosen and E. Ilievski, Nonequilibrium phase transi- tion in a periodically driven spin chain, Physical Review Letters107, 10.1103/physrevlett.107.060403 (2011)

    2011 doi

  37. [45]

    Russomanno, A

    A. Russomanno, A. Silva, and G. E. Santoro, Periodic steady regime and interference in a periodically driven quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 257201 (2012)

    2012

  38. [46]

    D’Alessio and A

    L. D’Alessio and A. Polkovnikov, Many-body energy lo- calization transition in periodically driven systems, An- nals of Physics333, 19–33 (2013)

    2013

  39. [47]

    Citro, E

    R. Citro, E. G. Dalla Torre, L. D’Alessio, A. Polkovnikov, M. Babadi, T. Oka, and E. Demler, Dynamical stabil- ity of a many-body kapitza pendulum, Annals of Physics 360, 694–710 (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Bukov, M

    M. Bukov, M. Heyl, D. A. Huse, and A. Polkovnikov, Heating and many-body resonances in a periodically driven two-band system, Phys. Rev. B93, 155132 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    Gritsev and A

    V. Gritsev and A. Polkovnikov, Integrable floquet dy- namics, SciPost Physics2, 10.21468/scipostphys.2.3.021 (2017)

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    Berdanier, M

    W. Berdanier, M. Kolodrubetz, R. Vasseur, and J. E. Moore, Floquet dynamics of boundary-driven systems at criticality, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 260602 (2017)

    2017

  43. [51]

    Wen and J.-Q

    X. Wen and J.-Q. Wu, Floquet conformal field the- ory, arXiv e-prints 10.48550/arXiv.1805.00031 (2018), arXiv:1805.00031 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2018 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    R. Fan, Y. Gu, A. Vishwanath, and X. Wen, Emergent spatial structure and entanglement localization in floquet conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. X10, 031036 (2020)

    2020

  45. [53]

    Lapierre, K

    B. Lapierre, K. Choo, C. Tauber, A. Tiwari, T. Neupert, and R. Chitra, Emergent black hole dynamics in critical floquet systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023085 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    Lapierre and P

    B. Lapierre and P. Moosavi, Geometric approach to in- 7 homogeneous floquet systems, Phys. Rev. B103, 224303 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Haldar, D

    A. Haldar, D. Sen, R. Moessner, and A. Das, Dynamical freezing and scar points in strongly driven floquet matter: Resonance vs emergent conservation laws, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021008 (2021)

    2021

  48. [56]

    Fleckenstein and M

    C. Fleckenstein and M. Bukov, Prethermalization and thermalization in periodically driven many-body systems away from the high-frequency limit, Phys. Rev. B103, L140302 (2021)

    2021

  49. [57]

    V. I. Yashin, D. V. Kurlov, A. K. Fedorov, and V. Grit- sev, Integrable Floquet systems related to logarithmic conformal field theory, SciPost Phys.14, 084 (2023)

    2023

  50. [58]

    T. N. Ikeda, S. Sugiura, and A. Polkovnikov, Robust ef- fective ground state in a nonintegrable floquet quantum circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 030401 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Bhattacharjee, S

    S. Bhattacharjee, S. Bandyopadhyay, and A. Polkovnikov, Sharp detection of the onset of floquet heating using eigenstate sensitivity, The European Phys- ical Journal B97, 10.1140/epjb/s10051-024-00773-6 (2024)

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    Gadge, A

    K. Gadge, A. Prem, and R. Jha, Temporal Entanglement Transitions in the Periodically Driven Ising Chain, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2510.13970 [quant-ph]

    2025

  53. [61]

    Z.-X. Lin, B. Lapierre, P. Moosavi, and S. Ryu, Chiral instabilities in driven-dissipative quantum liquids, Phys. Rev. B111, 165131 (2025)

    2025

  54. [62]

    Thuberg, S

    D. Thuberg, S. A. Reyes, and S. Eggert, Quantum reso- nance catastrophe for conductance through a periodically driven barrier, Phys. Rev. B93, 180301 (2016)

    2016

  55. [63]

    S. A. Reyes, D. Thuberg, D. P´ erez, C. Dauer, and S. Eg- gert, Transport through an AC-driven impurity: Fano in- terference and bound states in the continuum, New Jour- nal of Physics19, 043029 (2017)

    2017

  56. [64]

    Agarwala and D

    A. Agarwala and D. Sen, Effects of local periodic driving on transport and generation of bound states, Phys. Rev. B96, 104309 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    H¨ ubner, C

    F. H¨ ubner, C. Dauer, S. Eggert, C. Kollath, and A. Sheikhan, Floquet-engineered pair and single-particle filters in the fermi-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A106, 043303 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    H¨ ubner, C

    F. H¨ ubner, C. Dauer, S. Eggert, C. Kollath, and A. Sheikhan, Momentum-resolved floquet-engineered pair and single-particle filter in the fermi-hubbard model, Phys. Rev. A108, 023307 (2023)

    2023

  59. [67]

    A. Prem, V. B. Bulchandani, and S. L. Sondhi, Dynamics and transport in the boundary-driven dissipative klein- gordon chain, Phys. Rev. B107, 104304 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Melendrez, B

    R. Melendrez, B. Mukherjee, P. Sharma, A. Pal, and H. J. Changlani, Real-space thermalization of locally driven quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 104304 (2024)

    2024

  61. [69]

    Mukherjee, R

    B. Mukherjee, R. Melendrez, M. Szyniszewski, H. J. Changlani, and A. Pal, Emergent strong zero mode through local floquet engineering, Phys. Rev. B109, 064303 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    Y. Li, P. Sala, F. Pollmann, S. Moudgalya, and O. Motrunich, Dynamics in the presence of local symmetry-breaking impurities, Phys. Rev. B112, 155108 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    P. M. Schindler and M. Bukov, Geometric floquet theory, Phys. Rev. X15, 031037 (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    Brenes, E

    M. Brenes, E. Mascarenhas, M. Rigol, and J. Goold, High-temperature coherent transport in the xxz chain in the presence of an impurity, Phys. Rev. B98, 235128 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Chen, Z.-l

    P. Chen, Z.-l. Xue, I. P. McCulloch, M.-C. Chung, M. Cazalilla, and S. K. Yip, Entanglement entropy scal- ing of the XXZ chain, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2013, 10007 (2013)

    2013

  66. [74]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement and correlation functions following a local quench: a conformal field the- ory approach, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007, P10004–P10004 (2007)

    2007

  67. [75]

    See Supplemental Material (SM) for details regarding the derivation of the Floquet Hamiltonian, the Schrieffer- Wolff transformation, the Kato Hamiltonian/Average Energy operator, and numerical details about the MPS calculations

  68. [76]

    C. M. Langlett, Z.-C. Yang, J. Wildeboer, A. V. Gor- shkov, T. Iadecola, and S. Xu, Rainbow scars: From area to volume law, Physical Review B105, 10.1103/phys- revb.105.l060301 (2022)

    2022 doi

  69. [77]

    Pocklington, Y.-X

    A. Pocklington, Y.-X. Wang, Y. Yanay, and A. A. Clerk, Stabilizing volume-law entangled states of fermions and qubits using local dissipation, Physical Review B105, 10.1103/physrevb.105.l140301 (2022)

    2022 doi

  70. [78]

    W. C. Yu, J. Tangpanitanon, A. W. Glaetzle, D. Jaksch, and D. G. Angelakis, Discrete time crystal in globally driven interacting quantum systems without disorder, Phys. Rev. A99, 033618 (2019)

    2019

  71. [79]

    Pe˜ na, V

    R. Pe˜ na, V. M. Bastidas, F. Torres, W. J. Munro, and G. Romero, Fractional resonances and prethermal states in floquet systems, Phys. Rev. B106, 064307 (2022)

    2022

  72. [80]

    J. Yan, R. Moessner, and H. Zhao, Prethermalization in aperiodically kicked many-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 109, 064305 (2024)

    2024

  73. [81]

    I. V. Dudinets and O. Lychkovskiy, Fermionic transport through a driven quantum point contact: breakdown of floquet thermalization beyond a critical driving frequency (2024), arXiv:2411.04982 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024

  74. [82]

    Krinner, T

    S. Krinner, T. Esslinger, and J.-P. Brantut, Two-terminal transport measurements with cold atoms, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29, 343003 (2017)

    2017

  75. [83]

    Trisnadi, M

    J. Trisnadi, M. Zhang, L. Weiss, and C. Chin, Design and construction of a quantum matter synthesizer, Review of Scientific Instruments93, 10.1063/5.0100088 (2022)

    2022 doi

  76. [84]

    A. W. Young, W. J. Eckner, N. Schine, A. M. Childs, and A. M. Kaufman, Tweezer-programmable 2d quan- tum walks in a hubbard-regime lattice, Science377, 885–889 (2022)

    2022

  77. [85]

    G. M. Nixon, F. N. ¨Unal, and U. Schneider, Individually tunable tunnelling coefficients in optical lattices using lo- cal periodic driving, Quantum Science and Technology9, 045030 (2024)

    2024

  78. [86]

    Stefanini and J

    M. Stefanini and J. Marino, Orthogonality catastro- phe beyond bosonization from post-selection, Physical Review Research6, 10.1103/physrevresearch.6.l042022 (2024)

    2024 doi

  79. [87]

    Li, K.-H

    H.-H. Li, K.-H. Chou, X. Wen, and P.-Y. Chang, Impurity-induced non-unitary criticality (2025), arXiv:2502.12469 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Weinberg and M

    P. Weinberg and M. Bukov, QuSpin: a Python package for dynamics and exact diagonalisation of quantum many body systems part I: spin chains, SciPost Phys.2, 003 (2017)

    2017

  81. [89]

    Hauschild and F

    J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, Efficient numerical sim- ulations with Tensor Networks: Tensor Network Python 8 (TeNPy), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 5 (2018)

    2018

  82. [90]

    Viebahn, Introduction to floquet theory, Institute for Quantum Electronics, ETH Zurich8093(2020)

    K. Viebahn, Introduction to floquet theory, Institute for Quantum Electronics, ETH Zurich8093(2020)

    2020

  83. [91]

    Takahashiet al.,Thermodynamics of one-dimensional solvable models(Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1999)

    M. Takahashiet al.,Thermodynamics of one-dimensional solvable models(Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1999)

    1999

  84. [92]

    C. M. Bender and D. W. Hook, PT-symmetric quan- tum mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics96, 045002 (2024), arXiv:2312.17386 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Local-to-Global Entanglement Dynamics by Periodically Driving Impurities

    C. Zhang and E. Granet, Antiunitary symmetry breaking and a hierarchy of purification transitions in floquet non- unitary circuits (2023), arXiv:2307.07003 [quant-ph]. Supplementary Material for “Local-to-Global Entanglement Dynamics by Periodically Driving Impurities” Zhi-Xin...

    2023 arXiv

  86. [94]

    In Appendix A, we include the analytical derivation of the Floquet Hamiltonian and its spectrum for a harmon- ically driven impurity

  87. [95]

    In Appendix B, we use the Floquet Hamiltonian derived in Appendix A to demonstrate that the effective low-energy dynamics in the high-frequency limit is governed by local perturbations around the impurity

  88. [96]

    Appendix C provides a brief introduction of the Kato Hamiltonian and average energy operator and presents the application of these concepts to our models

  89. [97]

    In Appendix D, we reveal that the non-heating phase is characteristic of an effective local quench, exhibiting periodic partial revivals

  90. [98]

    Finally, Appendix E demonstrates that the local-to-global entanglement dynamics persists even for a non- Hermitian driven impurity, which has an enriched phase diagram with an additional spontaneous parity-time symmetry breaking transition. Appendix A: Floquet Hamiltonian of t...

  91. [99]

    At zeroth order, the Floquet Hamiltonian reducesπ(σ−N)/T, such that the stroboscopic dynamics is given by e−iπn(σ−N) = 1, thus EE remains constant over time,S A(t) =S A(0)

  92. [100]

    This implies that the dynamics is effectively governed byH L +H R, which corresponds to two uncoupled chains

    At first order, only bulk hopping terms are generated, with no coupling at the defect. This implies that the dynamics is effectively governed byH L +H R, which corresponds to two uncoupled chains. This scenario is basically a local quantum quench, where the entanglement will o...

  93. [101]

    We can expect that this purely local term should not have significant effect on the entanglement dynamics

    At second order, a local on-site perturbation appears at the defect site. We can expect that this purely local term should not have significant effect on the entanglement dynamics

  94. [102]

    These higher-order terms gradually extend the range of defect-induced couplings, though the growth is slow with increasing order

    At third order, the perturbation is still localized around the defect, but now couples sitesL−1 andL+ 1, as well asLandL+ 2. These higher-order terms gradually extend the range of defect-induced couplings, though the growth is slow with increasing order. In conclusions, the SW...

  95. [103]

    Brief review of geometric Floquet theory In the study of periodically driven quantum systems, the well-known Floquet theory provides a standard framework to understand their dynamics. For any periodically driven systemH(t) =H(t+T), the time evolution is characterized by two co...

  96. [104]

    Analytical calculation of single-particle Kato Hamiltonian We now apply the above construction to the harmonically driven impurity problem, in which case the single particle Kato Hamiltonian can be analytically calculated from the Floquet Hamiltonian, Eq. (4). We start from th...

  97. [105]

    Numerical calculation of Kato spectrum In our 2-step driven impurity model, we aim to numerically compute the average spectrumθ n(T) using ED, and observe if distinct spectral features emerge across the transition (see Fig. 3). In particular, we expect a breakdown 15 of adiaba...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.