Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

The conjectured Jacobi modularity of topological string amplitudes on torus-fibered Calabi-Yau threefolds follows from a single wave-function transformation property under the relative conifold monodromy.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 07:51 UTC pith:TPZGPJQP

load-bearing objection A genuine conditional reduction of the KKH/Γ1(N) modularity conjectures to the wave-function property of Z_top — but the full Γ1(N) statement is derived only for N≤4; the N=5,6 extra generators rest on numerically-checked identities, and the abstract's “we show” overstates the body. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2510.23722 v2 pith:TPZGPJQP submitted 2025-10-27 hep-th math.AG

Revisiting the Quantum Geometry of Torus-fibered Calabi-Yau Threefolds

Boris Pioline , Thorsten Schimannek This is my paper
classification hep-th math.AG MSC 14J3214N3511F50
keywords topological stringGromov-Witten invariantsJacobi formsDonaldson-Thomas invariantsgenus one fibrationsCalabi-Yau threefoldsmock modular formswave-function property
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper claims that the conjectured Jacobi modularity of topological string amplitudes on torus-fibered Calabi-Yau threefolds—the Katz-Klemm-Huang conjecture and its N-section generalization—is not an independent conjecture but follows from one physical principle: the topological string partition function transforms as a metaplectic wave function under the relative conifold monodromy T→T/(1+NT). Assuming that property, the authors derive the transformation of the normalized fixed-base-degree partition function as a Jacobi form of weight 0 under Γ1(N), introduce a holomorphic, modular-covariant variant Z_mod, and show that the generating series of genus-0 Gromov-Witten invariants maps to rank-0 D4-D2-D0 Donaldson-Thomas indices with matching anomaly equations. A sympathetic reader should care because this reduction would unify a large body of tested but unproven modularity predictions under a single mechanism and provide a practical path to computing all-genus Gromov-Witten invariants.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the wave-function property of the topological string partition function under the relative conifold monodromy implies, and is equivalent to, the Jacobi modularity of the normalized topological string amplitudes at fixed base degree. Concretely, Eq. (4.85) shows that under T→T/(1+NT) the modular-covariant amplitude Z_mod transforms with a multiplier system fixed by the topology of the fibration, and this yields the Jacobi form property of Z_H with weight 0 and index ½H·(H−c1(B)) under Γ1(N). The same monodromy maps genus-0 Gopakumar-Vafa generating series at fixed base degree to rank-0 D4-D2-D0 Donaldson-Thomas generating series, with the quasimodular anomaly

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the metaplectic (Gaussian-integral) transformation law for the topological string partition function under the relative conifold monodromy U, which acts as T→T/(1+NT) and is realized by a Fourier-Mukai transform with kernel the ideal sheaf of the relative diagonal. The explicit quadratic kernel (4.70) determines how Z_top transforms through the Gaussian integral (4.71). A second piece of machinery is the modular polarization: the improved Kähler moduli eS transform by constant shifts under Γ1(N), and the transformed amplitude Z_mod is both holomorphic and modular-covariant. This polarization strips off the modular anomalies and isolates the depth-zero parts of t

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands or falls on the assumption that the topological string partition function transforms as a quantum wave function—via the specific Gaussian-smeared integral (4.70)-(4.71)—under the monodromy that sends the fiber volume T to T/(1+NT).

What would settle it

Compute the fixed-base-degree topological free energies of a smooth torus-fibered Calabi-Yau threefold with an N-section outside the tabulated examples to sufficiently high genus, then check whether the normalized partition function satisfies the claimed Γ1(N) Jacobi transformation (2.51) and the derived holomorphic anomaly equations; a single clean counterexample would falsify the wave-function premise. A sharper check is to test the conjectured identity a_α=c_α used in the monodromy matrix, since its failure would alter the central transformation (4.85).

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the wave-function property holds, the Katz-Klemm-Huang conjecture and its N-section generalization become consequences of a single metaplectic transformation rule rather than independent conjectures.
  • The normalized fixed-base-degree partition function Z_H is a meromorphic Jacobi form of weight 0 and index ½H·(H−c1(B)) under Γ1(N), so all fixed-base-degree Gromov-Witten invariants are governed by finitely generated rings of Jacobi forms.
  • The genus-g generating series at fixed base degree are quasimodular forms of weight 2g−2 with depth controlled by decompositions of the base divisor class; their depth-zero parts are genuine modular forms computable from the modular-covariant amplitude Z_mod.
  • Rank-0 D4-D2-D0 Donaldson-Thomas indices form vector-valued mock modular forms under SL(2,Z), and their anomaly equation matches the quasimodular anomaly equation of genus-0 Gromov-Witten invariants despite different multicover effects.
  • For the 72 torus-fibered Calabi-Yau threefolds over P² tabulated in the paper, explicit modular generating series for genus-0 invariants at base degree 1 and 2 are determined, providing concrete testable predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the claimed equivalence runs both ways—every example where Jacobi modularity has been verified numerically becomes evidence for the wave-function property, so the paper's extensive tables double as a broad numerical test of the metaplectic hypothesis.
  • Editorial inference: the same monodromy argument should extend beyond the no-fibral-divisor setting to arbitrary genus-one fibrations with fibral divisors or non-trivial Mordell-Weil group, where the modular structure is expected to become vector-valued under the full modular group across Tate-Shafarevich partners.
  • Editorial inference: the holomorphic modular-covariant Z_mod suggests a canonical, anomaly-free polarization for the topological string partition function; if its analytic continuation can be controlled, it may constrain non-perturbative, resurgent corrections to the asymptotic genus expansion.
  • Editorial inference: the Fricke-type relation between generating series on a fibration and on its relative Jacobian companion could be tested numerically by computing genus-0 free energies on both geometries, offering a direct check of the proposed SL(2,Z) orbit of topological string amplitudes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper revisits the modularity of topological string amplitudes on compact Calabi-Yau threefolds fibered by genus-one curves with an N-section. Its main claim is that the Jacobi/quasimodular transformation properties of the genus-g Gromov-Witten generating series at fixed base degree, conjectured by Katz-Klemm-Huang and its N-section generalization, follow from the metaplectic 'wave-function property' of Z_top under the relative conifold monodromy T -> T/(1+NT). The authors introduce a 'modular polarization' wave function Z_mod that is holomorphic and modular covariant, and use the same monodromy to relate genus-zero GV generating series to rank-0 D4-D2-D0 DT generating series. A large part of the paper is devoted to constructing many explicit genus-one fibered CY threefolds over P^2 and del Pezzo surfaces with N <= 5 and tabulating their modular generating series.

Significance. If the main derivation were fully established, it would convert a large body of tested but unproven modularity conjectures into a theorem conditional only on the wave-function property, and would give a systematic computational tool for higher-genus GV invariants. The paper contains substantial original material: new proofs of Eichler-integral transformation identities for Γ1(N) in Appendix A, a careful construction and tabulation of many new examples beyond toric geometry, and a Mathematica worksheet. The reduction is genuine rather than circular: the input (metaplectic transformation) is different from the output (Jacobi/quasimodular properties), and the results match several known benchmarks. However, the central theorem is conditional on several unproven premises, and for N ≥ 5 the advertised full Γ1(N) modularity is not actually derived.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.4.3, Eq. (4.85) and Appendix A.4.1] The paper derives the transformation under the two generators T→T+1 and T→T/(1+NT). Together these generate Γ1(N) only for N≤4. For N=5,6,7, Table 1 lists additional generators, but the constants δ_α,x,y,z in (4.38)–(4.40) and (4.86) are never determined for those generators. Appendix A.4.1 states that the analogous Eichler-integral transformations (A.87)–(A.88) were only checked numerically and 'not attempted to prove'. Therefore the central claim that Γ1(N) Jacobi modularity follows from the wave-function property is not established for N≥5, which includes models in the paper's own census. The abstract's 'we show' overstates the body's result. This is load-bearing: the main theorem is advertised for all torus-fibered CYs with N-sections.
  2. [§4.2, Eq. (4.30) and footnotes 11, 23] The equality a_α = c_α is used to write the monodromy matrix U' in (4.30) and is essential for the multiplier and the simplified form of the key transformation (4.85). The authors state in footnote 11 that they are 'not aware of a proof in general'. This is not a minor technicality: without a_α = c_α, the derived Jacobi transformation law acquires an extra phase and the statement in §4.4.3 is not determined. The paper should either prove this equality for the class of fibrations considered, or explicitly include it as a hypothesis in the main theorems.
  3. [§3 and §6, Eq. (3.1) and Eq. (2.36)] The derivation uses the complete structure of base-degree-zero GV invariants (3.1) and the relations (2.36) for N>1 to fix constant terms, e.g. in (3.30)–(3.37) and in the genus-one transformation (4.76). Section 6 admits that these relations are expected but not rigorously proven for N>1 (only for elliptic fibrations via [83, Thm 6.9]). Since the normalization of the full amplitude and the zero-mode sector feed directly into the definition of Z_H(T,λ) and the Jacobi index, this is a load-bearing unproven premise. It should be stated as part of the theorem hypotheses or proven.
  4. [Abstract and §6] The abstract claims the modularity properties follow from, and are equivalent to, the wave-function property. The body establishes only the forward direction: assuming the wave-function property (itself 'far from being established mathematically', as conceded in §6), the U-transformation of Z_top implies the Jacobi transformation. No converse argument is given. The equivalence claim should be removed or explicitly qualified as a conjecture/evidence, rather than presented as a result of the paper.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.3, Eq. (4.47)] The term 'primitive case' is used without definition. Since the anomaly equation (4.48) depends crucially on whether H can be decomposed into effective classes, a precise definition would help the reader.
  2. [§2.4, Eq. (2.46) and (2.43)] The notation switches between lower and upper indices for bS_α and for ℓ_α. This is probably harmless but should be made consistent, especially in (2.44)–(2.47).
  3. [Appendix A.4.1] The identities (A.87)–(A.88) are labelled as conjectural only in the introductory sentence of A.4.1. Since they are needed for the N=5,6 cases, it would be helpful to state explicitly in §4.4.3 that the full Γ1(N) statement for N≥5 relies on these numerical checks.
  4. [§4.4.2, Eq. (4.78)–(4.85)] The Gaussian integral defining Z_mod is evaluated as a formal saddle-point expansion, but the convergence/regularization of the iterated integrals is not discussed. A short comment on the sense in which (4.85) holds (formal asymptotic series) would be useful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the claimed Jacobi modularity is a conditional consequence of the assumed wave-function property, not an input restated as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) assume the metaplectic wave-function transformation of Z_top, (4.10)/(4.19); (ii) compute the relative conifold monodromy action from the Fourier-Mukai kernel, leading to (4.30)-(4.37); (iii) obtain genus-zero quasimodularity and holomorphic anomaly equations by Fourier-expanding the transformed prepotential, (4.46)-(4.59); (iv) introduce the modular polarization Z_mod via the Gaussian transform (4.78)-(4.80) and compute its transformation (4.85); (v) expand in PT modes to conclude the Jacobi transformation under T -> T/(1+NT), (4.91). At no point is the Γ1(N) Jacobi property of Z_H inserted as an input. The base-degree-zero Eichler-integral transformations (3.30)/(3.37) are used only to fix constant/log terms in the genus-zero and genus-one transformations, and the H-dependent multiplier in (4.91) is a new output. The conjectural equality a_α=c_α (footnotes 11 and 23) and the structural assumptions (3.1)/(2.36) are explicitly flagged as unproved in §6; they make the theorem conditional but do not make the conclusion identical to the premises. The extra Γ1(N) generators for N≥5 are only checked numerically in A.4.1, so the full Γ1(N) statement for N≥5 is not completely proved; this is a proof gap, not circularity. Self-citations to [33,40] are to explicitly conjectural statements that are not the same as the target modularity. Overall, the central claim has independent content and the derivation is not circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 7 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central derivation rests on one big physical conjecture (wave-function/metaplectic monodromy behavior) plus a train of smaller conjectural equalities (a_α=c_α, base-degree-zero GV structure for N>1, no wall-crossing, extra generators for N=5,6, HPD-dual existence). The honest accounting: the paper reduces a large conjectural edifice to a smaller set of premises, and is explicit about which premises remain unproven.

free parameters (1)
  • Polynomial coefficients P_w in the modular ansatz (4.63) = Model-dependent; listed per model in Appendix D tables
    The holomorphic modular forms ef_k are fixed by matching finitely many known GV invariants (for sufficiently large k1); the q-expansions then 'predict' further coefficients. This is a fit with predictive reach, not a parameter-free derivation.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Wave-function property: Z_top transforms under monodromies in the metaplectic representation (4.10)/(4.19), with kernel (4.70) under U
    The entire engine of §4. Physically motivated but not mathematically established; the authors state in §6 it is 'far from being established mathematically.'
  • ad hoc to paper a_α = c_α (i.e., (1/12)∫_{D_α} c₂(TX) equals c₁(TB)·Ď_α)
    Used in the monodromy matrix (4.30) and the central transformation (4.85); flagged in footnotes 11 and 23 as unproven in general.
  • domain assumption Base-degree-zero GV structure (3.1) and relations (2.36) for N>1
    Proven for N=1 via [83, Thm 6.9]; conjectural for N>1 (footnote 12). Used throughout §3 and to couple the wave-function derivation to topological data (constant terms (3.30)–(3.37)).
  • domain assumption No wall-crossing between g_U·LV and the large-volume attractor chamber
    Needed for the DT-side equalities (5.12) and the GW↔DT relation (5.22); explicitly acknowledged as unproven in §5 and §6.
  • ad hoc to paper Extra-generator transformation identities for Γ1(N), N=5,6 (A.87)–(A.88)
    Checked numerically, not proven (A.4.1); needed for full Γ1(N) modularity beyond the two standard generators.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture 1: existence of homologically projective dual 5-section fibrations with Chern classes (C.46)
    Used to tabulate the 5-section models and their duals; explicitly conjectural in Appendix C.5, checked only against [34, Table 19] examples.
  • domain assumption Bayer-Macrì-Toda inequality for stability conditions on X
    Footnote 7: remains conjectural for the CY threefolds of interest; needed for the large-volume stability structure used in §2.2.
invented entities (1)
  • Z_mod — the modular-polarization topological wave function independent evidence
    purpose: A holomorphic, modular-covariant variant of Z_top whose depth-zero Fourier modes are the anomaly-free modular forms ef_k; used to derive the Jacobi property of Z_H and to package all-genus invariants.
    It makes concrete predictions for all-genus GV invariants at higher degree, and its N=1 output reproduces [25,26]; however its definition involves the E₂(NT)-shifted coordinates chosen precisely to cancel anomalies.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 87842 in / 20507 out tokens · 201978 ms · 2026-08-04T07:51:01.868945+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

About ten years ago, Katz, Klemm and Huang conjectured that topological string amplitudes on compact, elliptically fibered Calabi-Yau threefolds at fixed base degree could be expressed in terms of meromorphic Jacobi forms for $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$, giving access to Gromov-Witten invariants at arbitrary genus. This was later generalized to torus-fibered CY threefolds with $N$-sections, where topological string amplitudes are conjecturally governed by meromorphic Jacobi forms under the congruence subgroup $\Gamma_1(N)$. In this work, we show that these modularity properties follow from (and are equivalent to) the wave-function property of the topological string partition function $Z_{\rm top}$ under a relative conifold monodromy, implementing a particular Fourier-Mukai transformation on the derived category of coherent sheaves. In particular, we introduce a variant of $Z_{\rm top}$ which is both holomorphic and modular covariant. Under the same relative conifold monodromy, the generating series of genus 0 Gopakumar-Vafa invariants at fixed base degree is mapped to the generating series of rank 0 Donaldson-Thomas indices counting D4-D2-D0-brane bound states wrapped on the torus fiber. We show that the quasimodularity of the generating series of GV invariants matches the expected mock-modular behavior of the generating series of D4-D2-D0 indices, despite having different multi-cover contributions. We analyze and tabulate a large number of CY threefolds fibered over del Pezzo surfaces, with an $N$-section for $N\leq 5$, including several new examples beyond the realm of toric geometry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.23722 by Boris Pioline, Thorsten Schimannek.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Extended K¨ahler cone (left) and its image in dual coordinates (right) for models 1.1, 2.6, 4.4 (from top to bottom). The light red region indicates the effective cone for generic complex structure. On the left side, we have superposed the two components of the discriminant locus in blue and magenta. – 105 – [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p106_1.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Large Order Enumerative Geometry, Black Holes and Black Rings

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Numerical study of high-genus GV invariants reveals 5D indices matching BMPV black-hole entropy below a critical angular momentum and black-ring dominance above, with additional phase transitions and growth laws in PT...

  2. Large Order Enumerative Geometry, Black Holes and Black Rings

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Numerical analysis of 5D indices shows a transition from BMPV black hole entropy to black ring entropy at critical angular momentum m, while PT invariants exhibit two further transitions at positive m and DT invariant...

  3. Extended Supergravity Needs String Scale Cut-off

    hep-th 2026-06 conditional novelty 5.0

    String-scale UV cut-off in the gravitational path integral removes string-coupling dependence from the BPS black hole index in extended supergravity, matching supersymmetry expectations for zero-Euler-number cases.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 112 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Topological Sigma Models,

    E. Witten, “Topological Sigma Models,”Commun. Math. Phys.118(1988) 411

    1988

  2. [2]

    Holomorphic anomalies in topological field theories,

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri, and C. Vafa, “Holomorphic anomalies in topological field theories,”Nucl. Phys.B405(1993) 279–304, hep-th/9302103

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  3. [3]

    Topological amplitudes in string theory,

    I. Antoniadis, E. Gava, K. S. Narain, and T. R. Taylor, “Topological amplitudes in string theory,”Nucl. Phys. B413(1994) 162–184, hep-th/9307158

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  4. [4]

    M theory, topological strings and spinning black holes,

    S. H. Katz, A. Klemm, and C. Vafa, “M theory, topological strings and spinning black holes,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 1445–1537, hep-th/9910181

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory. I,

    D. Maulik, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, and R. Pandharipande, “Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory. I,”Compos. Math.142(2006), no. 5, 1263–1285

    2006

  6. [6]

    RankrDT theory from rank 1,

    S. Feyzbakhsh and R. P. Thomas, “RankrDT theory from rank 1,”Journal of the American Mathematical Society36(2023), no. 3, 795–826, 2108.02828

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Quantum BCOV theory on Calabi-Yau manifolds and the higher genus B-model,

    K. J. Costello and S. Li, “Quantum BCOV theory on Calabi-Yau manifolds and the higher genus B-model,” 1201.4501

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Effective Categorical Enumerative Invariants,

    A. Caldararu and J. Tu, “Effective Categorical Enumerative Invariants,” 2404.01499

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    The Topological vertex,

    M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Marino, and C. Vafa, “The Topological vertex,” Commun. Math. Phys.254(2005) 425–478, hep-th/0305132

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  10. [10]

    On the Remodeling Conjecture for Toric Calabi-Yau 3-Orbifolds,

    B. Fang, C.-C. M. Liu, and Z. Zong, “On the Remodeling Conjecture for Toric Calabi-Yau 3-Orbifolds,”J. Am. Math. Soc.33(2020), no. 1, 135–222, 1604.07123

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Topological string theory on compact Calabi-Yau: Modularity and boundary conditions,

    M.-x. Huang, A. Klemm, and S. Quackenbush, “Topological string theory on compact Calabi-Yau: Modularity and boundary conditions,”Lect. Notes Phys.757 (2009) 45–102, hep-th/0612125

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  12. [12]

    Quantum geometry, stability and modularity,

    S. Alexandrov, S. Feyzbakhsh, A. Klemm, B. Pioline, and T. Schimannek, “Quantum geometry, stability and modularity,”Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.18 (2024), no. 1, 49–151, 2301.08066. – 115 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Quantum geometry and mock modularity,

    S. Alexandrov, S. Feyzbakhsh, A. Klemm, and B. Pioline, “Quantum geometry and mock modularity,” 2312.12629

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [14]

    S-duality and refined BPS indices,

    S. Alexandrov, J. Manschot, and B. Pioline, “S-duality and refined BPS indices,” Commun. Math. Phys.380(2020), no. 2, 755–810, 1910.03098

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Black holes and higher depth mock modular forms,

    S. Alexandrov and B. Pioline, “Black holes and higher depth mock modular forms,” Commun. Math. Phys.374(2019), no. 2, 549–625, 1808.08479

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Modular bootstrap for D4-D2-D0 indices on compact Calabi–Yau threefolds,

    S. Alexandrov, N. Gaddam, J. Manschot, and B. Pioline, “Modular bootstrap for D4-D2-D0 indices on compact Calabi–Yau threefolds,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.27 (2023), no. 3, 683–744, 2204.02207

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Degenerations, derived lagrangians and categorification of dt invariants,

    V. Baranovsky, L. Katzarkov, M. Kontsevich, and A. Sheshmani, “Degenerations, derived lagrangians and categorification of dt invariants,”. International Congress of Basic Science, 2024

    2024

  18. [18]

    Gromov-Witten theory and Noether-Lefschetz theory,

    D. Maulik and R. Pandharipande, “Gromov-Witten theory and Noether-Lefschetz theory,” 0705.1653

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Noether-Lefschetz theory and the Yau-Zaslow conjecture,

    A. Klemm, D. Maulik, R. Pandharipande, and E. Scheidegger, “Noether-Lefschetz theory and the Yau-Zaslow conjecture,”Journal of the American Mathematical Society23(2010), no. 4, 1013–1040, 0807.2477

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  20. [20]

    Counting curves with modular forms,

    M. Henningson and G. W. Moore, “Counting curves with modular forms,”Nucl. Phys. B472(1996) 518–528, hep-th/9602154

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  21. [21]

    Special geometry and automorphic forms,

    P. Berglund, M. Henningson, and N. Wyllard, “Special geometry and automorphic forms,”Nucl. Phys. B503(1997) 256–276, hep-th/9703195

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  22. [22]

    Enumerative geometry and modularity in two-modulus K3-fibered Calabi-Yau threefolds,

    C. Doran, B. Pioline, and T. Schimannek, “Enumerative geometry and modularity in two-modulus K3-fibered Calabi-Yau threefolds,” 2408.02994. To appear in Adv. Theo. Math. Phys. (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Vertical D4-D2-D0 Bound States on K3 Fibrations and Modularity,

    V. Bouchard, T. Creutzig, D.-E. Diaconescu, C. Doran, C. Quigley, and A. Sheshmani, “Vertical D4-D2-D0 Bound States on K3 Fibrations and Modularity,”Commun. Math. Phys.350(2017), no. 3, 1069–1121, 1601.04030

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Mirror symmetry for two parameter models. 2.,

    P. Candelas, A. Font, S. H. Katz, and D. R. Morrison, “Mirror symmetry for two parameter models. 2.,”Nucl. Phys. B429(1994) 626–674, hep-th/9403187

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  25. [25]

    Topological Strings on Elliptic Fibrations,

    M. Alim and E. Scheidegger, “Topological Strings on Elliptic Fibrations,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.08(2014) 729–800, 1205.1784

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    Quantum geometry of elliptic Calabi-Yau manifolds,

    A. Klemm, J. Manschot, and T. Wotschke, “Quantum geometry of elliptic Calabi-Yau manifolds,”Comm. Number Theor. Phys.6(2012) 849–917, 1205.1795

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    BPS states of exceptional noncritical strings,

    A. Klemm, P. Mayr, and C. Vafa, “BPS states of exceptional noncritical strings,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.58(1997) 177, hep-th/9607139. – 116 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  28. [28]

    M-Strings,

    B. Haghighat, A. Iqbal, C. Koz¸ caz, G. Lockhart, and C. Vafa, “M-Strings,” Commun. Math. Phys.334(2015), no. 2, 779–842, 1305.6322

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  29. [29]

    Strings of Minimal 6d SCFTs,

    B. Haghighat, A. Klemm, G. Lockhart, and C. Vafa, “Strings of Minimal 6d SCFTs,”Fortsch. Phys.63(2015) 294–322, 1412.3152

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  30. [30]

    Topological String on elliptic CY 3-folds and the ring of Jacobi forms,

    M.-x. Huang, S. Katz, and A. Klemm, “Topological String on elliptic CY 3-folds and the ring of Jacobi forms,”JHEP10(2015) 125, 1501.04891

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Curve counting on elliptic Calabi–Yau threefolds via derived categories,

    G. Oberdieck and J. Shen, “Curve counting on elliptic Calabi–Yau threefolds via derived categories,”J. Eur. Math. Soc.22(2019), no. 3, 967–1002, 1608.07073

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Gromov-Witten theory of elliptic fibrations: Jacobi forms and holomorphic anomaly equations,

    G. Oberdieck and A. Pixton, “Gromov-Witten theory of elliptic fibrations: Jacobi forms and holomorphic anomaly equations,”Geom. Topol.23(2019) 1415–1489, 1709.01481

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Topological strings on genus one fibered Calabi-Yau 3-folds and string dualities,

    C. F. Cota, A. Klemm, and T. Schimannek, “Topological strings on genus one fibered Calabi-Yau 3-folds and string dualities,”JHEP11(2019) 170, 1910.01988

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    On genus one fibered calabi-yau threefolds with 5-sections,

    J. Knapp, E. Scheidegger, and T. Schimannek, “On genus one fibered calabi-yau threefolds with 5-sections,”Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics29 (2025), no. 5, 1165–1364

    2025

  35. [35]

    Modular curves, the Tate-Shafarevich group and Gopakumar-Vafa invariants with discrete charges,

    T. Schimannek, “Modular curves, the Tate-Shafarevich group and Gopakumar-Vafa invariants with discrete charges,”JHEP02(2022) 007, 2108.09311

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Topological Strings on Non-commutative Resolutions,

    S. Katz, A. Klemm, T. Schimannek, and E. Sharpe, “Topological Strings on Non-commutative Resolutions,”Commun. Math. Phys.405(2024), no. 3, 62, 2212.08655

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    New non-commutative resolutions of determinantal Calabi-Yau threefolds from hybrid GLSM,

    S. Katz and T. Schimannek, “New non-commutative resolutions of determinantal Calabi-Yau threefolds from hybrid GLSM,” 2307.00047. To appear in Adv. Theo. Math. Phys. (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    In search of almost generic Calabi-Yau 3-folds,

    T. Schimannek, “In search of almost generic Calabi-Yau 3-folds,” 2504.06115. To appear in Comm. Number Theor. Phys

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Noncommutative resolutions and CICY quotients from a non-abelian GLSM,

    J. Knapp and J. McGovern, “Noncommutative resolutions and CICY quotients from a non-abelian GLSM,” 2504.06147

    arXiv

  40. [40]

    The twisted geometry of 6d F-theory vacua with discrete gauge symmetries,

    D. J. Duque, A.-K. Kashani-Poor, and T. Schimannek, “The twisted geometry of 6d F-theory vacua with discrete gauge symmetries,” 2508.16500

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    The discrete Green-Schwarz mechanism in 6D F-theory and elliptic genera of non-critical strings,

    M. Dierigl, P.-K. Oehlmann, and T. Schimannek, “The discrete Green-Schwarz mechanism in 6D F-theory and elliptic genera of non-critical strings,”JHEP03 (2023) 090, 2212.04503

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Quantum background independence in string theory,

    E. Witten, “Quantum background independence in string theory,” hep-th/9306122. – 117 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  43. [43]

    Attractors and the holomorphic anomaly,

    E. P. Verlinde, “Attractors and the holomorphic anomaly,” hep-th/0412139

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Topological Strings and (Almost) Modular Forms,

    M. Aganagic, V. Bouchard, and A. Klemm, “Topological Strings and (Almost) Modular Forms,”Commun. Math. Phys.277(2008) 771–819, hep-th/0607100

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    Topological wave functions and heat equations,

    M. G¨ unaydin, A. Neitzke, and B. Pioline, “Topological wave functions and heat equations,”JHEP12(2006) 070, hep-th/0607200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  46. [46]

    Fivebrane instantons, topological wave functions and hypermultiplet moduli spaces,

    S. Alexandrov, D. Persson, and B. Pioline, “Fivebrane instantons, topological wave functions and hypermultiplet moduli spaces,”JHEP1103(2011) 111, 1010.5792

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  47. [47]

    Braid group actions on derived categories of coherent sheaves,

    P. Seidel and R. Thomas, “Braid group actions on derived categories of coherent sheaves,”Duke Mathematical Journal108(May, 2001)

    2001

  48. [48]

    Relative integral functors for singular fibrations and singular partners,

    D. Hern´ andez Ruip´ erez, A. C. L´ opez Mart ´ ın, and F. Sancho de Salas, “Relative integral functors for singular fibrations and singular partners,”Journal of the European Mathematical Society11(June, 2009) 597–625

    2009

  49. [49]

    Modularity from Monodromy,

    T. Schimannek, “Modularity from Monodromy,”JHEP05(2019) 024, 1902.08215

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    Homological Algebra of Mirror Symmetry,

    M. Kontsevich, “Homological Algebra of Mirror Symmetry,” alg-geom/9411018

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Fourier-Mukai transform and mirror symmetry for D-branes on elliptic Calabi-Yau,

    B. Andreas, G. Curio, D. H. Ruiperez, and S.-T. Yau, “Fourier-Mukai transform and mirror symmetry for D-branes on elliptic Calabi-Yau,” math/0012196

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Fiber wise T duality for D-branes on elliptic Calabi-Yau,

    B. Andreas, G. Curio, D. Hernandez Ruiperez, and S.-T. Yau, “Fiber wise T duality for D-branes on elliptic Calabi-Yau,”JHEP03(2001) 020, hep-th/0101129

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  53. [53]

    Black string entropy and Fourier-Mukai transform,

    I. Bena, D.-E. Diaconescu, and B. Florea, “Black string entropy and Fourier-Mukai transform,”JHEP04(2007) 045, hep-th/0610068

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  54. [54]

    Derived categories of twisted sheaves on elliptic threefolds,

    A. Caldararu, “Derived categories of twisted sheaves on elliptic threefolds,”Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal)2002(Jan., 2002) 161–179

    2002

  55. [55]

    Duality transformations in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories coupled to supergravity,

    A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara, and A. Van Proeyen, “Duality transformations in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theories coupled to supergravity,”Nucl. Phys. B444 (1995) 92–124, hep-th/9502072

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  56. [56]

    Precision counting of small black holes,

    A. Dabholkar, F. Denef, G. W. Moore, and B. Pioline, “Precision counting of small black holes,”JHEP10(2005) 096, hep-th/0507014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  57. [57]

    Lectures on black holes, topological strings and quantum attractors,

    B. Pioline, “Lectures on black holes, topological strings and quantum attractors,” Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) S981, hep-th/0607227

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  58. [58]

    M-theory and topological strings. I,

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, “M-theory and topological strings. I,” hep-th/9809187

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  59. [59]

    M-theory and topological strings. II,

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, “M-theory and topological strings. II,” hep-th/9812127. – 118 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    The Gopakumar-Vafa formula for symplectic manifolds,

    E.-N. Ionel and T. Parker, “The Gopakumar-Vafa formula for symplectic manifolds,”Ann. Math. (2)187(2018), no. 1, 1–64, 1306.1516

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [61]

    Moduli space reconstruction and Weak Gravity,

    N. Gendler, B. Heidenreich, L. McAllister, J. Moritz, and T. Rudelius, “Moduli space reconstruction and Weak Gravity,”JHEP12(2023) 134, 2212.10573

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    The Gopakumar-Vafa finiteness conjecture,

    A. Doan, E.-N. Ionel, and T. Walpuski, “The Gopakumar-Vafa finiteness conjecture,” 2103.08221

    arXiv

  63. [63]

    Wall Crossing from Boltzmann Black Hole Halos,

    J. Manschot, B. Pioline, and A. Sen, “Wall Crossing from Boltzmann Black Hole Halos,”JHEP07(2011) 059, 1011.1258

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  64. [64]

    Genus zero Gopakumar-Vafa invariants of contractible curves,

    S. H. Katz, “Genus zero Gopakumar-Vafa invariants of contractible curves,”J. Diff. Geom.79(2008), no. 2, 185–195, math/0601193

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  65. [65]

    Curve counting via stable pairs in the derived category,

    R. Pandharipande and R. P. Thomas, “Curve counting via stable pairs in the derived category,”Invent. Math.178(2009) 407–447, 0707.2348

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  66. [66]

    Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory. II,

    D. Maulik, N. Nekrasov, A. Okounkov, and R. Pandharipande, “Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory. II,”Compos. Math.142(2006), no. 5, 1286–1304

    2006

  67. [67]

    Multiple D3-instantons and mock modular forms I,

    S. Alexandrov, S. Banerjee, J. Manschot, and B. Pioline, “Multiple D3-instantons and mock modular forms I,”Commun. Math. Phys.353(2017), no. 1, 379–411, 1605.05945

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  68. [68]

    Multiple D3-instantons and mock modular forms II,

    S. Alexandrov, S. Banerjee, J. Manschot, and B. Pioline, “Multiple D3-instantons and mock modular forms II,”Commun. Math. Phys.359(2018), no. 1, 297–346, 1702.05497

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  69. [69]

    Modular anomaly of BPS black holes,

    S. Alexandrov and K. Bendriss, “Modular anomaly of BPS black holes,”JHEP12 (2024) 180, 2408.16819

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Stability and duality in N=2 supergravity,

    J. Manschot, “Stability and duality in N=2 supergravity,”Commun. Math. Phys. 299(2010) 651–676, 0906.1767

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  71. [71]

    Wall-crossing of D4-branes using flow trees,

    J. Manschot, “Wall-crossing of D4-branes using flow trees,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.15(2011), no. 1, 1–42, 1003.1570

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  72. [72]

    Mock Modularity at Work, or Black Holes in a Forest,

    S. Alexandrov, “Mock Modularity at Work, or Black Holes in a Forest,”Entropy27 (2025), no. 7, 719, 2505.02572

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Indefinite theta series and generalized error functions,

    S. Alexandrov, S. Banerjee, J. Manschot, and B. Pioline, “Indefinite theta series and generalized error functions,”Selecta Math.24(2018) 3927, 1606.05495

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    r-Tuple Error Functions and Indefinite Theta Series of Higher-Depth,

    C. Nazaroglu, “r-Tuple Error Functions and Indefinite Theta Series of Higher-Depth,”Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.12(2018) 581–608, 1609.01224

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  75. [75]

    Multi-centered Black Hole Quantum Mechanics and Generalized Error Functions,

    B. Pioline and R. Raj, “Multi-centered Black Hole Quantum Mechanics and Generalized Error Functions,” 2507.08551. – 119 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [76]

    The M5-brane elliptic genus: Modularity and BPS states,

    D. Gaiotto, A. Strominger, and X. Yin, “The M5-brane elliptic genus: Modularity and BPS states,”JHEP08(2007) 070, hep-th/0607010

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  77. [77]

    A farey tail for attractor black holes,

    J. de Boer, M. C. N. Cheng, R. Dijkgraaf, J. Manschot, and E. Verlinde, “A farey tail for attractor black holes,”JHEP11(2006) 024, hep-th/0608059

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  78. [78]

    Split states, entropy enigmas, holes and halos,

    F. Denef and G. W. Moore, “Split states, entropy enigmas, holes and halos,”JHEP 1111(2011) 129, hep-th/0702146

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  79. [79]

    A Modern Fareytail,

    J. Manschot and G. W. Moore, “A Modern Fareytail,”Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.4(2010) 103–159, 0712.0573

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  80. [80]

    Refinement and modularity of immortal dyons,

    S. Alexandrov and S. Nampuri, “Refinement and modularity of immortal dyons,” JHEP01(2021) 147, 2009.01172

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.