Spectral and Energy Efficiency Tradeoff for Pinching-Antenna Systems
Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:43 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Optimal pinching antenna positions are independent of transmit beamforming in single-user scenarios.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
In pinching-antenna systems the joint transmit and pinching beamforming design is proposed for the spectral-efficiency and energy-efficiency tradeoff. In the single-user scenario it is proved that the optimal pinching antenna positions are independent of the transmit beamforming. This insight yields a two-stage design: a general placement framework for multi-waveguide systems followed by a closed-form beamformer solution. In the multi-user scenario an alternating-optimization algorithm balances the tradeoff subject to quality-of-service requirements and is guaranteed to converge when no pinching-antenna placement constraints are violated.
What carries the argument
The independence of optimal pinching-antenna positions from transmit beamforming, which decouples the single-user optimization into a general placement stage and a closed-form beamformer stage.
If this is right
- A two-stage procedure suffices for the optimal joint design in single-user cases.
- The alternating-optimization algorithm converges for multi-user cases when placement constraints remain satisfied.
- The system exhibits strong robustness to changes in service area along the waveguide direction.
- Numerical evaluation confirms effective improvement in the joint spectral-energy efficiency performance.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Fixed geometric placement rules derived from the independence result could reduce the need for real-time repositioning hardware.
- The same separation may simplify control algorithms when pinching antennas are deployed in larger arrays or along curved waveguides.
- The demonstrated robustness suggests the approach remains useful when user locations vary over time within the service region.
Load-bearing premise
The practical channel and energy consumption models used to formulate the spectral-energy tradeoff objective and constraints accurately describe real pinching-antenna systems.
What would settle it
A single-user simulation or measurement in which the best pinching-antenna positions change when the transmit beamformer is altered would falsify the independence result.
Figures
read the original abstract
The joint transmit and pinching beamforming design for spectral efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE) tradeoff in pinching-antenna systems (PASS) is proposed, under practical channel and energy consumption models. In the single-user scenario, it is proved that the optimal pinching antenna (PA) positions are independent of the transmit beamforming. Based on this insight, a two-stage joint beamforming design is proposed. Specifically, in the first stage, a general PA placement framework is proposed for multi-waveguide systems. In the second stage, the closed-form solution for the optimal transmit beamformer is derived given the optimized PA positions. In the multi-user scenario, an alternating optimization (AO)-based joint beamforming design is proposed to balance the SE-EE performance while taking the quality-of-service (QoS) requirements into account. It is proved that the proposed AO-based algorithm is guaranteed to converge when no constraints are violated in PA placement subproblem. Numerical results demonstrate that: 1) the proposed algorithms effectively improve joint SE-EE performance; 2) PASS exhibits strong robustness against variations in the service area along the waveguide direction.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript proposes joint transmit and pinching beamforming design to optimize the spectral efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE) tradeoff in pinching-antenna systems (PASS) under practical channel and energy consumption models. In the single-user case, it proves that the optimal pinching antenna (PA) positions are independent of the transmit beamforming vector, enabling a two-stage optimization: a general PA placement framework for multi-waveguide systems followed by a closed-form transmit beamformer solution. For the multi-user case, an alternating optimization (AO) algorithm is developed that incorporates QoS constraints, with a proof of convergence when PA placement subproblem constraints are satisfied. Numerical results show improved joint SE-EE performance and robustness to variations in the service area along the waveguide direction.
Significance. If the independence result holds, the two-stage design substantially reduces computational complexity for PASS systems by decoupling PA placement from beamforming, which is a notable practical advantage. The convergence guarantee for the AO algorithm and the reported numerical gains in SE-EE tradeoff represent clear strengths, particularly the robustness findings. These elements could support more efficient implementations if the underlying channel and power models are validated.
major comments (1)
- [Single-user scenario analysis] Single-user scenario: the central claim that optimal PA positions are independent of transmit beamforming (enabling the two-stage design) requires explicit verification that the SE-EE objective separates cleanly. The manuscript should detail in the relevant derivation how the effective gain after waveguide propagation factors from the transmit covariance without position-dependent cross terms, and confirm that the energy consumption model (circuit plus transmit power) introduces no coupling that would invalidate the separation.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract and Section on single-user design] The abstract states proofs of independence and convergence but the main text would benefit from a brief outline of the key steps in the independence proof to improve readability for readers focused on the two-stage approach.
- [Numerical results] Numerical results section: clarify the specific parameter values used for the practical channel and energy models to allow reproducibility of the reported SE-EE gains.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review of our manuscript on spectral and energy efficiency tradeoff for pinching-antenna systems. The comment on the single-user scenario analysis is appreciated, as it helps strengthen the clarity of our derivations. We address the point in detail below and have revised the manuscript to provide additional explicit verification of the objective separation.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: Single-user scenario: the central claim that optimal PA positions are independent of transmit beamforming (enabling the two-stage design) requires explicit verification that the SE-EE objective separates cleanly. The manuscript should detail in the relevant derivation how the effective gain after waveguide propagation factors from the transmit covariance without position-dependent cross terms, and confirm that the energy consumption model (circuit plus transmit power) introduces no coupling that would invalidate the separation.
Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the single-user formulation, the SE-EE objective is expressed in terms of the effective channel gain after waveguide propagation to the chosen PA positions and the transmit covariance matrix. The waveguide propagation model yields a position-dependent scalar gain factor that multiplies the beamformed transmit signal; this factor appears outside the covariance term in the SNR expression, producing no position-dependent cross terms that couple the PA locations directly to the beamforming vector. Consequently, the optimization separates: the positions are chosen first to maximize the scalar gain (via the general placement framework), after which the optimal transmit beamformer admits a closed-form solution for the given positions. The energy consumption model consists of a constant circuit power term plus a transmit power term that depends only on the beamformer norm; because neither term depends on the PA positions, no additional coupling arises that would invalidate the separation. We have expanded the derivation in the revised Section III-A with intermediate algebraic steps to make this factorization explicit and to confirm the absence of cross terms. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: independence proof and two-stage design follow directly from separability in the stated channel and power models
full rationale
The paper derives the claimed independence of optimal PA positions from transmit beamforming by inspecting the structure of the SE-EE objective under the given practical channel model (waveguide propagation factors) and energy consumption model (circuit plus transmit power). This separability is shown via the paper's own equations rather than by fitting parameters to the target metric or by self-citation chains. The two-stage algorithm and AO convergence proof are likewise constructed from the same model without reducing to tautological inputs. No load-bearing step matches any of the enumerated circularity patterns.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Practical channel and energy consumption models for pinching-antenna systems
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
In the single-user scenario, it is proved that the optimal pinching antenna (PA) positions are independent of the transmit beamforming... two-stage joint beamforming design... closed-form solution for the optimal transmit beamformer
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.leanJ_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
fEE(w,X)= fSE(w,X) / (||w||^2 + Pf + χ fSE(w,X)) ... weighted product [fSE]^β [fEE]^(1-β)
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Energy Efficiency Maximization for Discrete Activation based NOMA-assisted Pinching-Antenna Systems
A matching-based outer layer and closed-form inner power allocation solve the mixed-integer EE maximization problem for NOMA-assisted pinching-antenna systems, yielding gains over fixed-antenna baselines while approac...
-
Pinching Antenna Systems (PASS): Enabling Reconfigurable and Controllable Wireless Channels -- A Comprehensive Survey
The paper provides a comprehensive review and categorization of pinching antenna systems (PASS) for objectives including network coverage, data rate, secure transmission, sensing, integrated sensing and communication,...
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
A survey of recent advances in optimization methods for wireless communications,
Y . Liu,et al., “A survey of recent advances in optimization methods for wireless communications,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2992-3031, 2024
work page 2024
-
[2]
An overview of MIMO communications-a key to gigabit wireless,
A. J. Paulraj, D. A. Gore, R. U. Nabar and H. Bolcskei, “An overview of MIMO communications-a key to gigabit wireless,”Proc. IEEE., vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 198-218, 2004
work page 2004
-
[3]
Power-domain non- orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in 5G systems: Potentials and challenges,
S. Islam, N. Avazov, O. Dobre and K. Kwak, “Power-domain non- orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in 5G systems: Potentials and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 721-742, 2017
work page 2017
-
[4]
E. Basar, “Noise modulation,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 844-848, 2023
work page 2023
-
[5]
Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and oppor- tunities,
Y . Liu,et al., “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and oppor- tunities,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1546-1577, 2021
work page 2021
-
[6]
K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K. F. Tong and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950-1962, 2021
work page 1950
-
[7]
Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,
L. Zhu, W. Ma and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234-6250, 2024
work page 2024
-
[8]
Exploiting pinching-antenna systems in multicast communications,
S. Shan, C. Ouyang, Y . Li and Y . Liu, “Exploiting pinching-antenna systems in multicast communications,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00616, 2025
-
[9]
The tri-hybrid MIMO architecture,
R. W. Heath, J. Carlson, N. V . Deshpande, M. R. Castellanos, M. Akrout and C. B. Chae, “The tri-hybrid MIMO architecture,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21971, 2025
-
[10]
Flexible-antenna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,
Z. Ding, R. Schober and H. Vincent Poor, “Flexible-antenna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,”IEEE Trans. Commun., early access, 2025
work page 2025
-
[11]
Rate maximization for downlink pinching-antenna systems,
Y . Xu, Z. Ding and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Rate maximization for downlink pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1431-1435, 2025
work page 2025
-
[12]
Pinching antenna: Using a dielectric waveguide as an antenna,
A. Fukuda, H. Yamamoto, H. Okazaki, Y . Suzuki, and K. Kawai, “Pinching antenna: Using a dielectric waveguide as an antenna,”NTT DOCOMO Tech. J., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 5–12, 2022
work page 2022
-
[13]
Performance analysis of pinching- antenna systems,
D. Tyrovolas, S. A. Tegos, P. D. Diamantoulakis, S. Ioannidis, C. K. Liaskos and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Performance analysis of pinching- antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., early access, 2025
work page 2025
-
[14]
Array gain for pinching- antenna systems (PASS),
C. Ouyang, Z. Wang, Y . Liu and Z. Ding, “Array gain for pinching- antenna systems (PASS),”IEEE Commun. Lett., early access, 2025
work page 2025
-
[15]
On the performance of uplink pinching antenna systems (PASS),
T. Hou, Y . Liu and A. Nallanathan, “On the performance of uplink pinching antenna systems (PASS),”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12365, 2025
-
[16]
Analytical optimization for antenna placement in pinching-antenna systems,
Z. Ding, H. V . Poor, “Analytical optimization for antenna placement in pinching-antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.13307, 2025
-
[17]
On the perf ormance analysis of pinching-antenna-enabled SWIPT systems,
B. Zhang, H. Zhang, K. Yang, Y . Zhao and K. Wang, “On the per- formance analysis of pinching-antenna-enabled SWIPT systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.03836, 2025
-
[18]
Rate region of ISAC for pinching-antenna systems,
C. Ouyang, Z. Wang, Y . Liu and Z. Ding, “Rate region of ISAC for pinching-antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505, 2025
work page 2025
-
[19]
Y . Cheng, C. Ouyang, Y . Liu and G. K. Karagiannidis, “On the performance of pinching-antenna systems (PASS) with orthogonal and non-orthogonal multiple access,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02420, 2025
-
[20]
Sum-rate maximization for NOMA-assisted pinching-antenna systems,
Z. Zhou, Z. Yang, G. Chen and Z. Ding, “Sum-rate maximization for NOMA-assisted pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., early access, 2025
work page 2025
-
[21]
Sum rate maximization for NOMA-assisted uplink pinching-antenna systems,
M. Zeng, J. Wang, X. Li, G. Wang, O. A. Dobre and Z. Ding, “Sum rate maximization for NOMA-assisted uplink pinching-antenna systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00549, 2025
-
[22]
S. Hu, R. Zhao, Y . Liao, D. W. Ng and J. Yuan, “Sum-rate maximization for pinching antenna-assisted NOMA systems with multiple dielectric waveguides,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10060, 2025
-
[23]
Antenna activation for NOMA assisted pinching-antenna systems,
K. Wang, Z. Ding and R. Schober, “Antenna activation for NOMA assisted pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., early access, 2025
work page 2025
-
[24]
Uplink sum rate maximization for pinching antenna-assisted multiuser MISO,
J. Zhang, H. Xu, C. Ouyang, Q. Zou and H. Yang, “Uplink sum rate maximization for pinching antenna-assisted multiuser MISO,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16577, 2025
-
[25]
Sum rate maximization for wireless powered pinching-antenna systems (PASS),
Y . Li, J. Wang, M. Zeng and Y . Liu, “Sum rate maximization for wireless powered pinching-antenna systems (PASS),”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00355, 2025
-
[26]
Waveguide division multiple access for pinching-antenna systems (PASS),
J. Zhao, X. Mu, K. Cai, Y . Zhu and Y . Liu, “Waveguide division multiple access for pinching-antenna systems (PASS),”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17781, 2025
-
[27]
Energy efficient resource allocation for NOMA-assisted uplink pinching-antenna systems,
M. Zeng, X. Li, J. Wang, G. Huang, O. A. Dobre and Z. Ding, “Energy efficient resource allocation for NOMA-assisted uplink pinching-antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07555, 2025
-
[28]
Energy-efficient design for downlink pinching-antenna systems with QoS guarantee,
M. Zeng, J. Wang, G. Zhou, F. Fang and X. Wang, “Energy-efficient design for downlink pinching-antenna systems with QoS guarantee,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14904, 2025
-
[29]
G. Zhou, Y . Mao and B. Clerckx, “Rate-splitting multiple access for multi-antenna downlink communication systems: Spectral and energy efficiency tradeoff,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 4816-4828, 2022
work page 2022
-
[30]
Pinching- antenna systems (PASS): Architecture designs, opportunities, and out- look,
Y . Liu, Z. Wang, X. Mu, C. Ouyang, X. Xu and Z. Ding, “Pinching- antenna systems (PASS): Architecture designs, opportunities, and out- look,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18409, 2025
-
[31]
MIMO- PASS: Uplink and downlink transmission via MIMO pinching-antenna systems,
A. Bereyhi, C. Ouyang, S. Asaad, Z. Ding and H. V . Poor, “MIMO- PASS: Uplink and downlink transmission via MIMO pinching-antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03117, 2025
-
[32]
Energy- spectral efficiency trade-off in IRS-assisted NOMA systems: A weighted product method,
H. Al-Obiedollah, H. Bany Salameh and S. Abdel-Razeq, “Energy- spectral efficiency trade-off in IRS-assisted NOMA systems: A weighted product method,”IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 635-644, 2025
work page 2025
-
[33]
Modeling and beamforming optimization for pinching-antenna systems,
Z. Wang, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, Y . Liu and Z. Ding, “Modeling and beamforming optimization for pinching-antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05917, 2025
-
[34]
J. Zhao, H. Song, X. Mu, K. Cai, Y . Zhu and Y . Liu, “Pinching-antenna systems-enabled multi-user communications: transmission structures and beamforming optimization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14458, 2025
-
[35]
Joint Beamforming and Position Optimization for FIRES-NOMA Assisted Wireless Communication Systems
Y . Liu, Q. Luo, G. Chen,et al., “Joint Beamforming and Position Opti- mization for Fluid STAR-RIS-NOMA Assisted Wireless Communication Systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06904, 2025
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.