pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.25192 · v2 · submitted 2025-10-29 · 📡 eess.SP

Spectral and Energy Efficiency Tradeoff for Pinching-Antenna Systems

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 03:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords pinching-antenna systemsspectral efficiencyenergy efficiencybeamforming designsingle-user optimizationmulti-user scenarioalternating optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Optimal pinching antenna positions are independent of transmit beamforming in single-user scenarios.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a joint transmit and pinching beamforming design to balance spectral efficiency and energy efficiency in pinching-antenna systems under practical channel and energy models. It proves that in the single-user case the best pinching antenna positions can be selected without reference to the transmit beamformer. This separation supports a two-stage procedure that first finds a general placement across multiple waveguides and then computes the optimal beamformer in closed form. For multiple users an alternating optimization routine iteratively tunes both elements while respecting quality-of-service constraints and is shown to converge when placement limits are observed. Numerical tests confirm improved SE-EE performance and robustness to shifts in the service area along the waveguide.

Core claim

In pinching-antenna systems the joint transmit and pinching beamforming design is proposed for the spectral-efficiency and energy-efficiency tradeoff. In the single-user scenario it is proved that the optimal pinching antenna positions are independent of the transmit beamforming. This insight yields a two-stage design: a general placement framework for multi-waveguide systems followed by a closed-form beamformer solution. In the multi-user scenario an alternating-optimization algorithm balances the tradeoff subject to quality-of-service requirements and is guaranteed to converge when no pinching-antenna placement constraints are violated.

What carries the argument

The independence of optimal pinching-antenna positions from transmit beamforming, which decouples the single-user optimization into a general placement stage and a closed-form beamformer stage.

If this is right

  • A two-stage procedure suffices for the optimal joint design in single-user cases.
  • The alternating-optimization algorithm converges for multi-user cases when placement constraints remain satisfied.
  • The system exhibits strong robustness to changes in service area along the waveguide direction.
  • Numerical evaluation confirms effective improvement in the joint spectral-energy efficiency performance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Fixed geometric placement rules derived from the independence result could reduce the need for real-time repositioning hardware.
  • The same separation may simplify control algorithms when pinching antennas are deployed in larger arrays or along curved waveguides.
  • The demonstrated robustness suggests the approach remains useful when user locations vary over time within the service region.

Load-bearing premise

The practical channel and energy consumption models used to formulate the spectral-energy tradeoff objective and constraints accurately describe real pinching-antenna systems.

What would settle it

A single-user simulation or measurement in which the best pinching-antenna positions change when the transmit beamformer is altered would falsify the independence result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.25192 by Yuanwei Liu, Zhaolin Wang, Zihao Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: System model for PASS-enabled single-user communications. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: System model for PASS-enabled multi-user communications. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: SE and EE performance in single-user case under different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Convergence of (a) the objective function in ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The SE-EE trade-off under different (a) PT , (b) N, and (c) Dx [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Achieved SE versus PT for various β. it achieves significantly faster convergence speed on (P2-8) compared to the using second-order Taylor expansion, while both approaches converge to the same optimal value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The joint transmit and pinching beamforming design for spectral efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE) tradeoff in pinching-antenna systems (PASS) is proposed, under practical channel and energy consumption models. In the single-user scenario, it is proved that the optimal pinching antenna (PA) positions are independent of the transmit beamforming. Based on this insight, a two-stage joint beamforming design is proposed. Specifically, in the first stage, a general PA placement framework is proposed for multi-waveguide systems. In the second stage, the closed-form solution for the optimal transmit beamformer is derived given the optimized PA positions. In the multi-user scenario, an alternating optimization (AO)-based joint beamforming design is proposed to balance the SE-EE performance while taking the quality-of-service (QoS) requirements into account. It is proved that the proposed AO-based algorithm is guaranteed to converge when no constraints are violated in PA placement subproblem. Numerical results demonstrate that: 1) the proposed algorithms effectively improve joint SE-EE performance; 2) PASS exhibits strong robustness against variations in the service area along the waveguide direction.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes joint transmit and pinching beamforming design to optimize the spectral efficiency (SE) and energy efficiency (EE) tradeoff in pinching-antenna systems (PASS) under practical channel and energy consumption models. In the single-user case, it proves that the optimal pinching antenna (PA) positions are independent of the transmit beamforming vector, enabling a two-stage optimization: a general PA placement framework for multi-waveguide systems followed by a closed-form transmit beamformer solution. For the multi-user case, an alternating optimization (AO) algorithm is developed that incorporates QoS constraints, with a proof of convergence when PA placement subproblem constraints are satisfied. Numerical results show improved joint SE-EE performance and robustness to variations in the service area along the waveguide direction.

Significance. If the independence result holds, the two-stage design substantially reduces computational complexity for PASS systems by decoupling PA placement from beamforming, which is a notable practical advantage. The convergence guarantee for the AO algorithm and the reported numerical gains in SE-EE tradeoff represent clear strengths, particularly the robustness findings. These elements could support more efficient implementations if the underlying channel and power models are validated.

major comments (1)
  1. [Single-user scenario analysis] Single-user scenario: the central claim that optimal PA positions are independent of transmit beamforming (enabling the two-stage design) requires explicit verification that the SE-EE objective separates cleanly. The manuscript should detail in the relevant derivation how the effective gain after waveguide propagation factors from the transmit covariance without position-dependent cross terms, and confirm that the energy consumption model (circuit plus transmit power) introduces no coupling that would invalidate the separation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Section on single-user design] The abstract states proofs of independence and convergence but the main text would benefit from a brief outline of the key steps in the independence proof to improve readability for readers focused on the two-stage approach.
  2. [Numerical results] Numerical results section: clarify the specific parameter values used for the practical channel and energy models to allow reproducibility of the reported SE-EE gains.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review of our manuscript on spectral and energy efficiency tradeoff for pinching-antenna systems. The comment on the single-user scenario analysis is appreciated, as it helps strengthen the clarity of our derivations. We address the point in detail below and have revised the manuscript to provide additional explicit verification of the objective separation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Single-user scenario: the central claim that optimal PA positions are independent of transmit beamforming (enabling the two-stage design) requires explicit verification that the SE-EE objective separates cleanly. The manuscript should detail in the relevant derivation how the effective gain after waveguide propagation factors from the transmit covariance without position-dependent cross terms, and confirm that the energy consumption model (circuit plus transmit power) introduces no coupling that would invalidate the separation.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the single-user formulation, the SE-EE objective is expressed in terms of the effective channel gain after waveguide propagation to the chosen PA positions and the transmit covariance matrix. The waveguide propagation model yields a position-dependent scalar gain factor that multiplies the beamformed transmit signal; this factor appears outside the covariance term in the SNR expression, producing no position-dependent cross terms that couple the PA locations directly to the beamforming vector. Consequently, the optimization separates: the positions are chosen first to maximize the scalar gain (via the general placement framework), after which the optimal transmit beamformer admits a closed-form solution for the given positions. The energy consumption model consists of a constant circuit power term plus a transmit power term that depends only on the beamformer norm; because neither term depends on the PA positions, no additional coupling arises that would invalidate the separation. We have expanded the derivation in the revised Section III-A with intermediate algebraic steps to make this factorization explicit and to confirm the absence of cross terms. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: independence proof and two-stage design follow directly from separability in the stated channel and power models

full rationale

The paper derives the claimed independence of optimal PA positions from transmit beamforming by inspecting the structure of the SE-EE objective under the given practical channel model (waveguide propagation factors) and energy consumption model (circuit plus transmit power). This separability is shown via the paper's own equations rather than by fitting parameters to the target metric or by self-citation chains. The two-stage algorithm and AO convergence proof are likewise constructed from the same model without reducing to tautological inputs. No load-bearing step matches any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard wireless channel models and energy consumption expressions for pinching antennas; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Practical channel and energy consumption models for pinching-antenna systems
    Invoked to define the SE-EE objective and constraints in both single-user and multi-user formulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5729 in / 1110 out tokens · 24008 ms · 2026-05-18T03:43:19.531643+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Energy Efficiency Maximization for Discrete Activation based NOMA-assisted Pinching-Antenna Systems

    eess.SP 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A matching-based outer layer and closed-form inner power allocation solve the mixed-integer EE maximization problem for NOMA-assisted pinching-antenna systems, yielding gains over fixed-antenna baselines while approac...

  2. Pinching Antenna Systems (PASS): Enabling Reconfigurable and Controllable Wireless Channels -- A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.IT 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    The paper provides a comprehensive review and categorization of pinching antenna systems (PASS) for objectives including network coverage, data rate, secure transmission, sensing, integrated sensing and communication,...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A survey of recent advances in optimization methods for wireless communications,

    Y . Liu,et al., “A survey of recent advances in optimization methods for wireless communications,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 2992-3031, 2024

  2. [2]

    An overview of MIMO communications-a key to gigabit wireless,

    A. J. Paulraj, D. A. Gore, R. U. Nabar and H. Bolcskei, “An overview of MIMO communications-a key to gigabit wireless,”Proc. IEEE., vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 198-218, 2004

  3. [3]

    Power-domain non- orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in 5G systems: Potentials and challenges,

    S. Islam, N. Avazov, O. Dobre and K. Kwak, “Power-domain non- orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) in 5G systems: Potentials and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 721-742, 2017

  4. [4]

    Noise modulation,

    E. Basar, “Noise modulation,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 844-848, 2023

  5. [5]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and oppor- tunities,

    Y . Liu,et al., “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and oppor- tunities,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1546-1577, 2021

  6. [6]

    Fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K. F. Tong and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950-1962, 2021

  7. [7]

    Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,

    L. Zhu, W. Ma and R. Zhang, “Modeling and performance analysis for movable antenna enabled wireless communications,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6234-6250, 2024

  8. [8]

    Exploiting pinching-antenna systems in multicast communications,

    S. Shan, C. Ouyang, Y . Li and Y . Liu, “Exploiting pinching-antenna systems in multicast communications,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00616, 2025

  9. [9]

    The tri-hybrid MIMO architecture,

    R. W. Heath, J. Carlson, N. V . Deshpande, M. R. Castellanos, M. Akrout and C. B. Chae, “The tri-hybrid MIMO architecture,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.21971, 2025

  10. [10]

    Flexible-antenna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,

    Z. Ding, R. Schober and H. Vincent Poor, “Flexible-antenna systems: A pinching-antenna perspective,”IEEE Trans. Commun., early access, 2025

  11. [11]

    Rate maximization for downlink pinching-antenna systems,

    Y . Xu, Z. Ding and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Rate maximization for downlink pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1431-1435, 2025

  12. [12]

    Pinching antenna: Using a dielectric waveguide as an antenna,

    A. Fukuda, H. Yamamoto, H. Okazaki, Y . Suzuki, and K. Kawai, “Pinching antenna: Using a dielectric waveguide as an antenna,”NTT DOCOMO Tech. J., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 5–12, 2022

  13. [13]

    Performance analysis of pinching- antenna systems,

    D. Tyrovolas, S. A. Tegos, P. D. Diamantoulakis, S. Ioannidis, C. K. Liaskos and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Performance analysis of pinching- antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., early access, 2025

  14. [14]

    Array gain for pinching- antenna systems (PASS),

    C. Ouyang, Z. Wang, Y . Liu and Z. Ding, “Array gain for pinching- antenna systems (PASS),”IEEE Commun. Lett., early access, 2025

  15. [15]

    On the performance of uplink pinching antenna systems (PASS),

    T. Hou, Y . Liu and A. Nallanathan, “On the performance of uplink pinching antenna systems (PASS),”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12365, 2025

  16. [16]

    Analytical optimization for antenna placement in pinching-antenna systems,

    Z. Ding, H. V . Poor, “Analytical optimization for antenna placement in pinching-antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.13307, 2025

  17. [17]

    On the perf ormance analysis of pinching-antenna-enabled SWIPT systems,

    B. Zhang, H. Zhang, K. Yang, Y . Zhao and K. Wang, “On the per- formance analysis of pinching-antenna-enabled SWIPT systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.03836, 2025

  18. [18]

    Rate region of ISAC for pinching-antenna systems,

    C. Ouyang, Z. Wang, Y . Liu and Z. Ding, “Rate region of ISAC for pinching-antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505, 2025

  19. [19]

    On the performance of pinching-antenna systems (PASS) with orthogonal and non-orthogonal multiple access,

    Y . Cheng, C. Ouyang, Y . Liu and G. K. Karagiannidis, “On the performance of pinching-antenna systems (PASS) with orthogonal and non-orthogonal multiple access,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02420, 2025

  20. [20]

    Sum-rate maximization for NOMA-assisted pinching-antenna systems,

    Z. Zhou, Z. Yang, G. Chen and Z. Ding, “Sum-rate maximization for NOMA-assisted pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., early access, 2025

  21. [21]

    Sum rate maximization for NOMA-assisted uplink pinching-antenna systems,

    M. Zeng, J. Wang, X. Li, G. Wang, O. A. Dobre and Z. Ding, “Sum rate maximization for NOMA-assisted uplink pinching-antenna systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00549, 2025

  22. [22]

    Sum-rate max- imization for pinching antenna-assisted NOMA systems with multiple dielectric waveguides,

    S. Hu, R. Zhao, Y . Liao, D. W. Ng and J. Yuan, “Sum-rate maximization for pinching antenna-assisted NOMA systems with multiple dielectric waveguides,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.10060, 2025

  23. [23]

    Antenna activation for NOMA assisted pinching-antenna systems,

    K. Wang, Z. Ding and R. Schober, “Antenna activation for NOMA assisted pinching-antenna systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., early access, 2025

  24. [24]

    Uplink sum rate maximization for pinching antenna-assisted multiuser MISO,

    J. Zhang, H. Xu, C. Ouyang, Q. Zou and H. Yang, “Uplink sum rate maximization for pinching antenna-assisted multiuser MISO,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.16577, 2025

  25. [25]

    Sum rate maximization for wireless powered pinching-antenna systems (PASS),

    Y . Li, J. Wang, M. Zeng and Y . Liu, “Sum rate maximization for wireless powered pinching-antenna systems (PASS),”arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00355, 2025

  26. [26]

    Waveguide division multiple access for pinching-antenna systems (PASS),

    J. Zhao, X. Mu, K. Cai, Y . Zhu and Y . Liu, “Waveguide division multiple access for pinching-antenna systems (PASS),”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.17781, 2025

  27. [27]

    Energy efficient resource allocation for NOMA-assisted uplink pinching-antenna systems,

    M. Zeng, X. Li, J. Wang, G. Huang, O. A. Dobre and Z. Ding, “Energy efficient resource allocation for NOMA-assisted uplink pinching-antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.07555, 2025

  28. [28]

    Energy-efficient design for downlink pinching-antenna systems with QoS guarantee,

    M. Zeng, J. Wang, G. Zhou, F. Fang and X. Wang, “Energy-efficient design for downlink pinching-antenna systems with QoS guarantee,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14904, 2025

  29. [29]

    Rate-splitting multiple access for multi-antenna downlink communication systems: Spectral and energy efficiency tradeoff,

    G. Zhou, Y . Mao and B. Clerckx, “Rate-splitting multiple access for multi-antenna downlink communication systems: Spectral and energy efficiency tradeoff,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 4816-4828, 2022

  30. [30]

    Pinching- antenna systems (PASS): Architecture designs, opportunities, and out- look,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, X. Mu, C. Ouyang, X. Xu and Z. Ding, “Pinching- antenna systems (PASS): Architecture designs, opportunities, and out- look,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18409, 2025

  31. [31]

    MIMO- PASS: Uplink and downlink transmission via MIMO pinching-antenna systems,

    A. Bereyhi, C. Ouyang, S. Asaad, Z. Ding and H. V . Poor, “MIMO- PASS: Uplink and downlink transmission via MIMO pinching-antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03117, 2025

  32. [32]

    Energy- spectral efficiency trade-off in IRS-assisted NOMA systems: A weighted product method,

    H. Al-Obiedollah, H. Bany Salameh and S. Abdel-Razeq, “Energy- spectral efficiency trade-off in IRS-assisted NOMA systems: A weighted product method,”IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 635-644, 2025

  33. [33]

    Modeling and beamforming optimization for pinching-antenna systems,

    Z. Wang, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, Y . Liu and Z. Ding, “Modeling and beamforming optimization for pinching-antenna systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.05917, 2025

  34. [34]

    Pinching-antenna systems-enabled multi-user communications: transmission structures and beamforming optimization,

    J. Zhao, H. Song, X. Mu, K. Cai, Y . Zhu and Y . Liu, “Pinching-antenna systems-enabled multi-user communications: transmission structures and beamforming optimization,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.14458, 2025

  35. [35]

    Joint Beamforming and Position Optimization for FIRES-NOMA Assisted Wireless Communication Systems

    Y . Liu, Q. Luo, G. Chen,et al., “Joint Beamforming and Position Opti- mization for Fluid STAR-RIS-NOMA Assisted Wireless Communication Systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06904, 2025