pith. sign in

arxiv: 2510.26998 · v1 · pith:BDLXGETInew · submitted 2025-10-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Stability and Dynamics of Sn-based Halide Perovskites: Insights from MACE-MP-0 and Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Thiago Puccinelli , Lucas Martin Farigliano , Gustavo Martini Dalpian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 20:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords tin-based halide perovskitesmachine learning potentialsmolecular dynamicsphase transitionsstructural stabilityCsSnBr3Cs2SnBr6thermal behavior
0
0 comments X

The pith

A general machine learning potential qualitatively predicts temperature-driven phase changes in tin halide perovskites

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests whether the pretrained MACE-MP-0 model can describe the finite-temperature stability and dynamics of CsSnBr3 and Cs2SnBr6 using molecular dynamics without any material-specific retraining. Simulations from 100 K to 500 K show CsSnBr3 shifting from orthorhombic to cubic structure with minor thermodynamic signatures, while Cs2SnBr6 holds a cubic form with a rigid octahedral network. A sympathetic reader would care because these lead-free compounds are candidates for solar cells and electronics, so a fast off-the-shelf computational check could accelerate early screening of new compositions. The work concludes that the model captures the main trends but notes that finer experimental phases would require targeted adjustments.

Core claim

MACE-MP-0 applied without fine-tuning in NpT molecular dynamics simulations reproduces an orthorhombic-to-cubic phase transition in CsSnBr3, visible in lattice-parameter evolution and small anomalies in enthalpy and specific heat, although the intermediate tetragonal phase is not observed, while Cs2SnBr6 stays cubic with a more rigid octahedral framework across the full temperature range as indicated by radial distribution functions, bond-angle distributions, translational order parameters, and vibrational spectra.

What carries the argument

MACE-MP-0 interatomic potential driving NpT molecular dynamics simulations whose outputs are tracked through lattice parameters, enthalpy, specific heat, radial distribution functions, bond-angle distributions, and vibrational spectra

If this is right

  • MACE-MP-0 can function as a practical first screening tool for thermal stability in other Sn-based halide perovskites.
  • System-specific fine-tuning with density-functional-theory data is required when more subtle intermediate phases must be resolved.
  • Multiple structural and thermodynamic descriptors together reliably distinguish rigid versus flexible octahedral frameworks.
  • This workflow supports rapid qualitative assessment of how temperature affects lattice parameters and vibrational modes in these compounds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Broadly trained potentials of this type may lower the barrier for initial computational exploration of many lead-free perovskite candidates.
  • Applying the same protocol to mixed-halide or doped variants could map compositional trends in phase stability.
  • Direct comparison of simulated specific-heat peaks against calorimetric measurements at several temperatures would quantify the model's limits on transition details.

Load-bearing premise

The broad training data of MACE-MP-0 transfers accurately enough to capture the temperature-driven phase behavior and octahedral framework rigidity in these specific Sn-halide perovskites without any fine-tuning or validation against DFT for the target systems.

What would settle it

If higher-accuracy DFT-based simulations or temperature-dependent diffraction experiments show that CsSnBr3 lacks an orthorhombic-to-cubic transition or exhibits markedly different specific-heat features between 100 K and 500 K, the claim of qualitative predictive power for MACE-MP-0 would be refuted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.26998 by Gustavo Martini Dalpian, Lucas Martin Farigliano, Thiago Puccinelli.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Crystal structures of the simulated supercells: (a) cubic CsSnBr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Average values obtained during the production stage ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) CsSnBr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Radial distribution function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Translational order parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Probability distribution of the Br–Sn–Br bond angle for (a) CsSnBr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Temperature dependence of angular properties for CsSnBr [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Calculated vibrational spectra of the full structures of Cs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Tin-based halide perovskites have emerged as promising lead-free alternatives for optoelectronic applications, yet their structural stability and phase behavior at finite temperatures remain challenging to predict. Here, we assess the predictive capabilities of the foundational machine learning model MACE-MP-0 - trained on a broad chemical space and applied without system-specific fine-tuning - for the temperature-dependent behavior of CsSnBr3 and Cs2SnBr6. Molecular Dynamics simulations in the NpT ensemble were performed from 100 K to 500 K, and thermodynamic and structural descriptors including enthalpy, specific heat, radial distribution functions, translational order, bond angle distributions, and vibrational spectra were analyzed. Our results show that CsSnBr3 undergoes a low-temperature orthorhombic-to-cubic phase transition, evidenced by both the evolution of lattice parameters and subtle anomalies in enthalpy and specific heat, although the experimentally observed intermediate tetragonal phase is not captured. In contrast, Cs2SnBr6 remains cubic and maintains a more rigid octahedral framework across the entire temperature range. Overall, MACE-MP-0 qualitatively reproduces key thermal and structural features of these materials, highlighting its usefulness as a first step for studying new materials. For cases where capturing more subtle phase behavior is required, system-specific fine-tuning with Density Functional Theory data should be considered.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript evaluates the performance of the pre-trained MACE-MP-0 machine learning interatomic potential in molecular dynamics simulations of the tin-based halide perovskites CsSnBr3 and Cs2SnBr6. Using NpT ensemble MD from 100 to 500 K, the authors analyze thermodynamic properties (enthalpy, specific heat) and structural metrics (lattice parameters, radial distribution functions, bond angles, vibrational spectra) to assess phase stability and dynamics. They report that the model captures an orthorhombic-to-cubic transition in CsSnBr3 (though missing the experimental tetragonal phase) and the cubic stability with rigid octahedra in Cs2SnBr6, concluding that MACE-MP-0 is useful as a first step for studying such materials, with fine-tuning recommended for more subtle behaviors.

Significance. If the transferability of MACE-MP-0 holds without fine-tuning, this work would illustrate the utility of broad foundation models for rapid, qualitative screening of finite-temperature structural and thermodynamic properties in lead-free halide perovskites. The multi-descriptor analysis (enthalpy anomalies, RDFs, bond-angle distributions, and spectra) provides a coherent qualitative picture of octahedral rigidity and phase evolution, which is a strength for initial exploration in materials discovery.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results sections: the central claim that MACE-MP-0 qualitatively reproduces the orthorhombic-to-cubic transition (via lattice parameters and enthalpy/specific-heat anomalies) in CsSnBr3 rests on unvalidated transferability; no system-specific DFT benchmarks for Sn-Br bonding, tilting energetics, or short MD runs are reported to anchor the observed features against model biases in the training distribution.
  2. [Methods] Methods section: the NpT MD protocol is conventional, but the manuscript provides no quantitative error bars, convergence tests with respect to system size or timestep, or direct experimental/DFT comparisons for key observables such as transition temperature or vibrational spectra, limiting verification of the reproduced phase behavior.
  3. [Results] Results section: while the missed tetragonal intermediate phase in CsSnBr3 is openly noted, there is no follow-up analysis (e.g., comparison of octahedral tilt angles or phonon modes) to diagnose whether this reflects a limitation in MACE-MP-0's description of anharmonicity for these specific compositions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and legends should explicitly state the temperature range and ensemble used for each plotted quantity to improve readability.
  2. [Methods] The definition of the translational order parameter and bond-angle distribution metrics should be given with explicit formulas in the Methods section rather than referenced only to prior work.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and positive review, which recognizes the potential of MACE-MP-0 for qualitative exploration of lead-free perovskites. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation of limitations and supporting analyses where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Results] Abstract and Results sections: the central claim that MACE-MP-0 qualitatively reproduces the orthorhombic-to-cubic transition (via lattice parameters and enthalpy/specific-heat anomalies) in CsSnBr3 rests on unvalidated transferability; no system-specific DFT benchmarks for Sn-Br bonding, tilting energetics, or short MD runs are reported to anchor the observed features against model biases in the training distribution.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of system-specific DFT benchmarks for Sn-Br interactions and tilting energetics limits the strength of the transferability claim. Our study deliberately examines zero-shot application of the pre-trained MACE-MP-0 model, with the transition supported by convergence across independent descriptors (lattice parameters, enthalpy anomalies, RDFs, and bond-angle distributions) that match experimental orthorhombic-to-cubic trends. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit discussion of this limitation and note that targeted DFT validation of tilting energetics would be a valuable follow-up for quantitative accuracy. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods section: the NpT MD protocol is conventional, but the manuscript provides no quantitative error bars, convergence tests with respect to system size or timestep, or direct experimental/DFT comparisons for key observables such as transition temperature or vibrational spectra, limiting verification of the reproduced phase behavior.

    Authors: We accept that quantitative error bars, system-size convergence tests, and additional comparisons would improve verifiability. The revised manuscript will include error estimates on enthalpy and specific-heat curves, a supplementary note confirming convergence for the supercell sizes employed, and direct comparison of the computed vibrational spectra against available experimental Raman data for CsSnBr3. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results] Results section: while the missed tetragonal intermediate phase in CsSnBr3 is openly noted, there is no follow-up analysis (e.g., comparison of octahedral tilt angles or phonon modes) to diagnose whether this reflects a limitation in MACE-MP-0's description of anharmonicity for these specific compositions.

    Authors: We welcome the suggestion for diagnostic analysis. The revised Results section will incorporate temperature-dependent octahedral tilt-angle distributions and a brief comparison of low-frequency phonon modes to help identify whether the missing tetragonal phase arises from insufficient anharmonicity in the model for this composition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from direct MD with external pre-trained model

full rationale

The paper applies the pre-trained MACE-MP-0 model (trained on broad Materials Project data) without fine-tuning or parameter adjustment to the target CsSnBr3/Cs2SnBr6 systems. Thermodynamic and structural descriptors (enthalpy, specific heat, lattice parameters, RDFs, bond angles, vibrational spectra) are computed directly from NpT MD trajectories at 100-500 K. These outputs emerge from the fixed interatomic potential and dynamics; no equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations define the target observables in terms of themselves. The qualitative reproduction of phase behavior is therefore an independent simulation result against external experimental benchmarks, not a reduction by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The study relies on the transferability of a pre-trained general-purpose ML potential and standard assumptions of classical molecular dynamics; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced by the authors.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption MACE-MP-0 provides sufficiently accurate forces for these Sn-based perovskites across 100-500 K without system-specific retraining.
    Central to the claim that the model can be used as a first-step tool; invoked when interpreting the observed phase transition and structural rigidity.
  • domain assumption NpT molecular dynamics with the chosen thermostat and barostat faithfully reproduces experimental thermal behavior.
    Standard MD assumption required to link simulation descriptors to real temperature-dependent properties.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5781 in / 1402 out tokens · 28227 ms · 2026-05-21T20:26:53.955140+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Liang, J

    X. Liang, J. Klarbring, W. J. Baldwin, Z. Li, G. Cs´ anyi, and A. Walsh, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C127, 19141 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Inamuddin, A

    A. Inamuddin, A. Asiri, and K. Suvardhan,Green sustainable process for chemical and envi- ronmental engineering and science(Elsevier, 2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    M. I. H. Ansari, A. Qurashi, and M. K. Nazeeruddin, Journal of Photochemistry and Photo- biology C: Photochemistry Reviews35, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    P. J. Dale and M. A. Scarpulla, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells251, 112097 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    T. Li, X. Luo, P. Wang, Z. Li, Y. Li, J. Huang, Z. Jin, Y. Yang, B. Li, W. Zhang,et al., Nature , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    J. M. Frost and A. Walsh, Accounts of chemical research49, 528 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    M. A. Carignano, S. A. Aravindh, I. S. Roqan, J. Even, and C. Katan, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C121, 20729 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Jinnouchi, J

    R. Jinnouchi, J. Lahnsteiner, F. Karsai, G. Kresse, and M. Bokdam, Physical review letters 122, 225701 (2019). 16

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Wiktor, E

    J. Wiktor, E. Fransson, D. Kubicki, and P. Erhart, arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07402 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    C. Yi, J. Luo, S. Meloni, A. Boziki, N. Ashari-Astani, C. Gr¨ atzel, S. M. Zakeeruddin, U. R¨ othlisberger, and M. Gr¨ atzel, Energy & Environmental Science9, 656 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    R. E. Beal, D. J. Slotcavage, T. Leijtens, A. R. Bowring, R. A. Belisle, W. H. Nguyen, G. F. Burkhard, E. T. Hoke, and M. D. McGehee, The journal of physical chemistry letters7, 746 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Raval, R

    P. Raval, R. M. Kennard, E. S. Vasileiadou, C. J. Dahlman, I. Spanopoulos, M. L. Chabinyc, M. Kanatzidis, and G. Manjunatha Reddy, ACS Energy Letters7, 1534 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    M. Ren, X. Qian, Y. Chen, T. Wang, and Y. Zhao, Journal of Hazardous Materials426, 127848 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    S. F. Hoefler, G. Trimmel, and T. Rath, Monatshefte f¨ ur Chemie-Chemical Monthly148, 795 (2017)

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    A. K. Jena, A. Kulkarni, and T. Miyasaka, Chemical reviews119, 3036 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    W. Ke, C. C. Stoumpos, and M. G. Kanatzidis, Advanced Materials31, 1803230 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Aktas, N

    E. Aktas, N. Rajamanickam, J. Pascual, S. Hu, M. H. Aldamasy, D. Di Girolamo, W. Li, G. Nasti, E. Mart´ ınez-Ferrero, A. Wakamiya,et al., Communications Materials3, 104 (2022)

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Lanzetta, N

    L. Lanzetta, N. Aristidou, and S. A. Haque, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters11, 574 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    G. M. Dalpian, Q. Liu, C. C. Stoumpos, A. P. Douvalis, M. Balasubramanian, M. G. Kanatzidis, and A. Zunger, Physical Review Materials1, 025401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Kohn and L

    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Physical review140, A1133 (1965)

    work page 1965

  21. [21]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Physical review B47, 558 (1993)

    work page 1993

  22. [22]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Baseggio, P. Bonf` a, D. Brunato, R. Car, I. Carnimeo, C. Cavazzoni, S. De Gironcoli, P. Delugas, F. Ferrari Ruffino,et al., The Journal of chemical physics152 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    T. D. K¨ uhne, M. Iannuzzi, M. Del Ben, V. V. Rybkin, P. Seewald, F. Stein, T. Laino, R. Z. Khaliullin, O. Sch¨ utt, F. Schiffmann,et al., The Journal of Chemical Physics152(2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Fransson, J

    E. Fransson, J. M. Rahm, J. Wiktor, and P. Erhart, Chemistry of Materials35, 8229 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    L. M. Farigliano, F. N. Ribeiro, and G. M. Dalpian, Materials Advances5, 5794 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    X.-G. Zhao, G. M. Dalpian, Z. Wang, and A. Zunger, Physical Review B101, 155137 (2020). 17

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Kaiser, E

    W. Kaiser, E. Mosconi, A. A. Alothman, D. Meggiolaro, A. Gagliardi, and F. De Angelis, Materials Advances2, 3915 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Kaiser, D

    W. Kaiser, D. Ricciarelli, E. Mosconi, A. A. Alothman, F. Ambrosio, and F. De Angelis, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters13, 2321 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Mosconi, J

    E. Mosconi, J. M. Azpiroz, and F. De Angelis, Chemistry of materials27, 4885 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    M. A. Carignano, A. Kachmar, and J. Hutter, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C119, 8991 (2015)

    work page 2015

  31. [31]

    Behler and M

    J. Behler and M. Parrinello, Physical review letters98, 146401 (2007)

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    A. P. Bart´ ok, M. C. Payne, R. Kondor, and G. Cs´ anyi, Physical review letters104, 136403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  33. [33]

    A. P. Thompson, L. P. Swiler, C. R. Trott, S. M. Foiles, and G. J. Tucker, Journal of Com- putational Physics285, 316 (2015)

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    K. T. Sch¨ utt, H. E. Sauceda, P.-J. Kindermans, A. Tkatchenko, and K.-R. M¨ uller, The Journal of Chemical Physics148(2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    V. L. Deringer, M. A. Caro, and G. Cs´ anyi, Advanced Materials31, 1902765 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Batzner, A

    S. Batzner, A. Musaelian, L. Sun, M. Geiger, J. P. Mailoa, M. Kornbluth, N. Molinari, T. E. Smidt, and B. Kozinsky, Nature communications13, 2453 (2022)

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    T. W. Ko and S. P. Ong, Nature Computational Science3, 998 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry

    I. Batatia, P. Benner, Y. Chiang, A. M. Elena, D. P. Kov´ acs, J. Riebesell, X. R. Advincula, M. Asta, M. Avaylon, W. J. Baldwin,et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00096 (2023)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Batatia, S

    I. Batatia, S. Batzner, D. P. Kov´ acs, A. Musaelian, G. N. Simm, R. Drautz, C. Ortner, B. Kozinsky, and G. Cs´ anyi, Nature Machine Intelligence , 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Drautz, Physical Review B99, 014104 (2019)

    R. Drautz, Physical Review B99, 014104 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    A. Jain, Y. Shin, and K. A. Persson, Nature Reviews Materials1, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Hirotsu, J

    S. Hirotsu, J. Harada, M. Iizumi, and K. Gesi, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan37, 1393 (1974)

    work page 1974

  43. [43]

    C. C. Stoumpos, C. D. Malliakas, J. A. Peters, Z. Liu, M. Sebastian, J. Im, T. C. Chasapis, A. C. Wibowo, D. Y. Chung, A. J. Freeman,et al., Crystal growth & design13, 2722 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Onoda-Yamamuro, T

    N. Onoda-Yamamuro, T. Matsuo, and H. Suga, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 51, 1383 (1990). 18

    work page 1990

  45. [45]

    Whitfield, N

    P. Whitfield, N. Herron, W. Guise, K. Page, Y. Cheng, I. Milas, and M. Crawford, Scientific reports6, 35685 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    C. Mao, X. He, H.-M. Lin, M. K. Gupta, P. Postec, T. Lanigan-Atkins, M. Krogstad, D. M. Pajerowski, T. Hong, T. J. Williams,et al., Physical Review Materials9, 065401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Liang, J

    X. Liang, J. Klarbring, and A. Walsh, Chemistry of Materials (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [48]

    Plimpton, Journal of computational physics117, 1 (1995)

    S. Plimpton, Journal of computational physics117, 1 (1995)

    work page 1995

  49. [49]

    Allen, D

    M. Allen, D. Tildesley, and D. Tildesley,Computer Simulation of Liquids(Oxford University Press, 2017)

    work page 2017

  50. [50]

    J. R. Errington and P. G. Debenedetti, Nature409, 318 (2001)

    work page 2001

  51. [51]

    Mori and H

    M. Mori and H. Saito, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics19, 2391 (1986)

    work page 1986

  52. [52]

    D. H. Fabini, G. Laurita, J. S. Bechtel, C. C. Stoumpos, H. A. Evans, A. G. Kontos, Y. S. Raptis, P. Falaras, A. Van der Ven, M. G. Kanatzidis,et al., Journal of the American Chemical Society138, 11820 (2016). 19

    work page 2016