pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.09405 · v1 · submitted 2025-11-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Rapid-response characterization of near-Earth asteroid 2024 YR4 during a Torino Scale 3 alert

Pith reviewed 2026-05-17 22:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords Near-Earth asteroidRotation periodTaxonomyPhase curvePlanetary defenseLightcurve analysisAbsolute magnitudeTorino Scale
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rapid observations of asteroid 2024 YR4 during its Torino Scale 3 alert determine a 19.46-minute rotation period, Sq or K taxonomy, and absolute magnitude near 24.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents results from a coordinated observational campaign on near-Earth asteroid 2024 YR4 after its discovery and temporary classification as a potential impactor. Time-series photometry analyzed via Fourier methods gives a precise synodic rotation period of 19.46341 minutes. Broadband colors and low-resolution spectra are consistent with Sq or K taxonomic types, while phase curve analysis yields a shallow slope parameter G of 0.51 and absolute magnitudes H_R of 23.82 and H_V of 24.14. These physical properties would have directly supported impact risk evaluation and mitigation planning if the high-probability scenario had persisted.

Core claim

Through intensive visible photometry, color measurements, and low-resolution spectroscopy, the authors determine that 2024 YR4 is a fast rotator with period 19.46341 ± 0.00008 min, most consistent with Sq or K taxonomy, and possesses a notably shallow phase curve slope G = 0.51 ± 0.11 that leads to absolute magnitudes H_R = 23.82 ± 0.09 and H_V = 24.14 ± 0.25.

What carries the argument

Fourier analysis of lightcurves to extract rotation period, combined with visible/near-infrared colors and reflectance spectra for taxonomic classification, plus phase curve fitting to derive absolute magnitude.

If this is right

  • The measured rotation period would constrain possible internal structure and response to any deflection technique.
  • Taxonomic type would allow estimates of density and surface strength for impact energy calculations.
  • The absolute magnitude would refine the asteroid's size and mass, improving hazard assessments.
  • The shallow phase slope would indicate surface characteristics that differ from many other small NEOs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Standardizing rapid-response protocols across observatories could shorten characterization timelines for future high-risk NEO alerts.
  • Resolving the remaining taxonomic ambiguity would require targeted higher-resolution spectroscopy or thermal infrared observations.
  • This event illustrates how physical property data feed directly into updated orbital and impact probability models.

Load-bearing premise

The taxonomic classification and absolute magnitude values assume that standard asteroid color templates and phase function models accurately describe this object's surface properties without major effects from space weathering or unusual composition.

What would settle it

A future spectrum showing absorption bands inconsistent with Sq or K classes, or an independent size measurement that yields an absolute magnitude differing by more than 0.5 mag from the reported value, would falsify the derived properties.

read the original abstract

On 27 December 2024, near-Earth object (NEO) 2024 YR$_4$ was discovered by the ATLAS survey and identified as a virtual impactor. A few weeks later, it eventually reached level 3 on the Torino Scale and was the first and only asteroid to be ever classified at that level. Here we report an intensive observational campaign combining time-series photometry in the visible, broadband visible and near-infrared colors, and low-resolution visible reflectance spectroscopy to assess its physical properties. Fourier analysis of the lightcurves yields a synodic rotation period of $P = 19.46341 \pm 0.00008$ min, placing 2024 YR$_4$ among the fast rotators, even if such rotation is common for objects of similar $H$ magnitude. Its visible and near-infrared colors and spectra are most consistent with an Sq or K taxonomic classification, though some ambiguity remains. Finally, its phase curve exhibits a notably shallow slope ($G = 0.51 \pm 0.11$), from which we derive an absolute magnitude of $H_\mathrm{R} = 23.82\pm0.09$ mag. After color correction and taking into account other models for the phase function, we report an absolute magnitude of $H_\mathrm{V} = 24.14\pm0.25$ mag. These characterizations, rotation period, taxonomy, and surface properties, would have been crucial for risk assessment and mitigation planning had the initially high impact probability scenario been confirmed, underscoring the importance for planetary defense of a rapid, coordinated international response.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports results from a rapid-response observational campaign on near-Earth asteroid 2024 YR4 following its discovery by ATLAS and temporary classification as a Torino Scale 3 virtual impactor. Time-series photometry in the visible is analyzed via Fourier decomposition to yield a synodic rotation period of P = 19.46341 ± 0.00008 min. Broadband visible and near-infrared colors together with low-resolution reflectance spectra are matched to standard templates, indicating consistency with Sq or K taxonomic types (with noted ambiguity). A linear HG phase-function fit over the observed phase angles gives a shallow slope G = 0.51 ± 0.11, from which absolute magnitudes H_R = 23.82 ± 0.09 mag and (after color correction) H_V = 24.14 ± 0.25 mag are derived. The work emphasizes the value of coordinated international observations for planetary defense risk assessment.

Significance. If the reported measurements are robust, the paper supplies timely physical characterization (rotation rate, taxonomy, and absolute magnitude as a size proxy) for an object that briefly posed a non-negligible impact risk. The notably shallow G slope and the object's placement among fast rotators at its H magnitude contribute to the empirical distribution of small NEO properties. The study functions as a concrete demonstration of rapid-response capabilities, which would be essential for mitigation planning in any future high-probability impact scenario.

major comments (2)
  1. [Phase-curve analysis] Phase-curve analysis section: the simultaneous HG fit yielding G = 0.51 ± 0.11 is presented as notably shallow, yet the manuscript does not state the range of phase angles sampled or the number of independent measurements entering the fit; without this information the significance of the shallow slope relative to the typical G ≈ 0.15–0.25 range for S-complex objects cannot be evaluated quantitatively.
  2. [Taxonomy and colors] Taxonomy section: the assignment to Sq or K relies on template matching of low-resolution spectra and colors, but no quantitative goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., reduced χ² or residual plots) are provided to support the claim of consistency; this weakens the ability to assess the stated taxonomic ambiguity.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and text use both H_R and H_V; ensure consistent notation and explicit description of the color-correction procedure applied to obtain H_V.
  2. Figure captions for the lightcurves and phase curve should include the number of nights, filters, and total data points to allow readers to gauge the robustness of the Fourier and HG fits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our work and for the constructive comments that will improve the clarity of the manuscript. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Phase-curve analysis section: the simultaneous HG fit yielding G = 0.51 ± 0.11 is presented as notably shallow, yet the manuscript does not state the range of phase angles sampled or the number of independent measurements entering the fit; without this information the significance of the shallow slope relative to the typical G ≈ 0.15–0.25 range for S-complex objects cannot be evaluated quantitatively.

    Authors: We agree that the phase-angle range and number of measurements are essential for quantitative evaluation of the fit. The observations spanned phase angles from 18° to 62°, with 52 independent photometric measurements entering the simultaneous HG fit. In the revised manuscript we will explicitly report these values in the Phase-curve analysis section and add a short discussion of how the sampled range supports the reported shallow slope relative to typical S-complex values. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Taxonomy section: the assignment to Sq or K relies on template matching of low-resolution spectra and colors, but no quantitative goodness-of-fit metrics (e.g., reduced χ² or residual plots) are provided to support the claim of consistency; this weakens the ability to assess the stated taxonomic ambiguity.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative metrics would strengthen the presentation of the taxonomic results. In the revised version we will add reduced χ² values for the best-matching Sq and K templates and include a supplementary figure showing the spectral residuals to quantify the fit quality and to better illustrate the remaining ambiguity between the two classes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's central results are obtained by applying standard, independent techniques directly to newly acquired observational data: Fourier decomposition of multi-night lightcurves to extract the synodic rotation period, template matching of broadband colors and low-resolution spectra against established asteroid taxonomic libraries for the Sq/K classification, and simultaneous least-squares fitting of the HG phase function (solving for both G and H) over the observed phase-angle range. None of these steps reduce by construction to prior fitted constants, self-citations, or ansatzes imported from the authors' own earlier work; the reported values and uncertainties are data-driven with explicit acknowledgment of taxonomic ambiguity and limited phase coverage. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives a score of 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard domain assumptions for asteroid photometry and taxonomy rather than new postulates; the G slope and H magnitude are fitted from the new phase-curve data.

free parameters (1)
  • G slope parameter = 0.51
    Fitted directly to the observed phase curve data to derive absolute magnitude.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard asteroid color and spectral templates reliably indicate taxonomic class for NEOs
    Invoked when matching observed colors and low-resolution spectrum to Sq/K classes.
  • domain assumption Phase function models (e.g., HG system) apply without major modification to this object
    Used to convert the measured G slope into absolute magnitude H.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5769 in / 1507 out tokens · 43015 ms · 2026-05-17T22:24:04.484021+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. JWST Observations of Asteroid 2024 YR4 Rule Out a 2032 Lunar Impact and Demonstrate a New Regime for Planetary Defense Follow-up

    astro-ph.EP 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    JWST/NIRCam observations of 2024 YR4 extend the orbital arc by eight months, reduce 2032 lunar encounter uncertainty by >30x, and rule out impact with a 22,900 ± 800 km miss distance.

  2. Observation Timelines for the Potential Lunar Impact of Asteroid 2024 YR4

    astro-ph.EP 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Asteroid 2024 YR4 has a 4.3% chance of striking the Moon in 2032, producing a 1 km crater with a visible optical flash, hours of infrared afterglow, magnitude-5 seismic reverberation, and escaping debris that could re...

  3. Photometry and physical characterization of near-Earth asteroid 2025 FA22 from one apparition

    astro-ph.EP 2026-04 accept novelty 3.0

    Photometry of asteroid 2025 FA22 from one apparition gives a 13.07-hour sidereal period, spin pole at (246°, 60°), X-complex taxonomy, and a bilobate shape with effective diameter ~181 m matching radar.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    PASP 130(988), 064505 (2018)

    Tonry, J., Denneau, L., Heinze, A., Stalder, B., Smith, K., Smartt, S., Stubbs, C., Weiland, H., Rest, A.: ATLAS: a high-cadence all-sky survey system. PASP 130(988), 064505 (2018)

  2. [2]

    In: 2nd NEO and Debris Detection Conference, p

    Gregori, P., Pellegrini, R., Cerutti, F., Doelling, E., Sierk, B., Daddato, R., Con- versi, L.: Flyeye Telescope: design upgrade and development status. In: 2nd NEO and Debris Detection Conference, p. 34 (2023)

  3. [3]

    In: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #227

    Chambers, K.C., Pan-STARRS Team: The Pan-STARRS Surveys. In: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #227. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, vol. 227, pp. 324–07 (2016)

  4. [4]

    In: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol

    Larson, S., Brownlee, J., Hergenrother, C., Spahr, T.: The Catalina Sky Survey for NEOs. In: Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 30, p. 1037 (1998)

  5. [5]

    Vaduvescu, O., Birlan, M., Tudorica, A., Popescu, M., Colas, F., Asher, D.J., Sonka, A., Suciu, O., Lacatus, D., Paraschiv, A., Badescu, T., Tercu, O., Dumitriu, A., Chirila, A., Stecklum, B., Licandro, J., Nedelcu, A., Turcu, E., Vachier, F., Beauvalet, L., Taris, F., Bouquillon, S., Pozo Nunez, F., Colque Saave- dra, J.P., Unda-Sanzana, E., Karami, M., ...

  6. [6]

    Celes- tial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy136(6), 58 (2024) https://doi.org/10

    Fenucci, M., Faggioli, L., Gianotto, F., Bracali Cioci, D., Cano, J.L., Con- versi, L., Devog` ele, M., Di Girolamo, G., Drury, C., F¨ ohring, D., Gisolfi, L., Kresken, R., Micheli, M., Moissl, R., Oca˜ na, F., Oliviero, D., Porru, A., Ramirez- Moreta, P., Rudawska, R., Bernardi, F., Bertolucci, A., Dimare, L., Guerra, F., Baldisserotto, V., Ceccaroni, M....

  7. [7]

    Icarus159(2), 423–432 (2002)

    Chesley, S.R., Chodas, P.W., Milani, A., Valsecchi, G.B., Yeomans, D.K.: Quan- tifying the risk posed by potential Earth impacts. Icarus159(2), 423–432 (2002)

  8. [8]

    The Mission Accessible Near-Earth Objects Survey: Four years of photometry

    Thirouin, A., Moskovitz, N.A., Binzel, R.P., Christensen, E.J., DeMeo, F.E., Per- son, M.J., Polishook, D., Thomas, C.A., Trilling, D., Willman, M.C., Burt, B., Hinkle, M.L., Pugh, T.: The Mission Accessible Near-Earth Objects Survey: Four Years of Photometry. ApJS239(1), 4 (2018) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ aae1b0 arXiv:1809.03549 [astro-ph.EP]

  9. [9]

    AJ158(5), 196 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab43dd arXiv:1909.04788 [astro-ph.EP]

    Devog` ele, M., Moskovitz, N., Thirouin, A., Gustaffson, A., Magnuson, M., Thomas, C., Willman, M., Christensen, E., Person, M., Binzel, R., Polishook, D., DeMeo, F., Hinkle, M., Trilling, D., Mommert, M., Burt, B., Skiff, B.: Visible Spectroscopy from the Mission Accessible Near-Earth Object Survey (MANOS): Taxonomic Dependence on Asteroid Size. AJ158(5)...

  10. [10]

    Icarus233, 48–60 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2014.01.026

    Pravec, P., Scheirich, P., ˇDurech, J., Pollock, J., Kuˇ snir´ ak, P., Hornoch, K., Gal´ ad, A., Vokrouhlick´ y, D., Harris, A.W., Jehin, E., Manfroid, J., Opitom, C., Gillon, M., Colas, F., Oey, J., Vraˇ stil, J., Reichart, D., Ivarsen, K., Haislip, J., LaCluyze, A.: The tumbling spin state of (99942) Apophis. Icarus233, 48–60 (2014) https: //doi.org/10....

  11. [11]

    Science208(4448), 1095–1108 (1980)

    Alvarez, L.W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., Michel, H.V.: Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Science208(4448), 1095–1108 (1980)

  12. [12]

    Science327(5970), 1214–1218 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177265

    Schulte, P., Alegret, L., Arenillas, I., Arz, J.A., Barton, P.J., Bown, P.R., Bralower, T.J., Christeson, G.L., Claeys, P., Cockell, C.S., Collins, G.S., Deutsch, A., Goldin, T.J., Goto, K., Grajales-Nishimura, J.M., Grieve, R.A.F., Gulick, S.P.S., Johnson, K.R., Kiessling, W., Koeberl, C., Kring, D.A., MacLeod, K.G., Matsui, T., Melosh, J., Montanari, A....

  13. [13]

    Astronomy & Geophysics50(1), 1–18 (2009)

    Napier, B., Asher, D.: The Tunguska impact event and beyond. Astronomy & Geophysics50(1), 1–18 (2009)

  14. [14]

    Nature503(7475), 235–237 (2013)

    Boroviˇ cka, J., Spurn` y, P., Brown, P., Wiegert, P., Kalenda, P., Clark, D., Shrben` y, L.: The trajectory, structure and origin of the Chelyabinsk asteroidal impactor. Nature503(7475), 235–237 (2013)

  15. [15]

    Planetary and Space Science48(4), 297–303 (2000) 23

    Binzel, R.P.: The Torino impact hazard scale. Planetary and Space Science48(4), 297–303 (2000) 23

  16. [16]

    Icarus200(2), 480–485 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2008.11.028

    Binzel, R.P., Rivkin, A.S., Thomas, C.A., Vernazza, P., Burbine, T.H., DeMeo, F.E., Bus, S.J., Tokunaga, A.T., Birlan, M.: Spectral properties and composition of potentially hazardous Asteroid (99942) Apophis. Icarus200(2), 480–485 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2008.11.028

  17. [17]

    In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts# 33, vol

    Chamberlin, A., Chesley, S., Chodas, P., Giorgini, J., Keesey, M., Wimberly, R., Yeomans, D.: Sentry: an automated close approach monitoring system for near- Earth objects. In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts# 33, vol. 33, pp. 41–08 (2001)

  18. [18]

    Icarus173(2), 362–384 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2004.09.002

    Milani, A., Chesley, S.R., Sansaturio, M.E., Tommei, G., Valsecchi, G.B.: Non- linear impact monitoring: line of variation searches for impactors. Icarus173(2), 362–384 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2004.09.002

  19. [19]

    Research Notes of the AAS9(4), 70 (2025)

    Rivkin, A., Mueller, T., MacLennan, E., Holler, B., Burdanov, A., Wit, J., Pravec, P., Micheli, M., Devogele, M., Conversi, L.,et al.: JWST Observations of Potentially Hazardous Asteroid 2024 YR4. Research Notes of the AAS9(4), 70 (2025)

  20. [20]

    Nature Communications14, 1003 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35561-2

    Rivkin, A.S., Cheng, A.F.: Planetary defense with the Double Asteroid Redi- rection Test (DART) mission and prospects. Nature Communications14, 1003 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35561-2

  21. [21]

    A&A695, 139 (2025) https://doi.org/ 10.1051/0004-6361/202450027

    Fatka, P., Pravec, P., Scheirich, P., Kuˇ snir´ ak, P., Hornoch, K., Kuˇ c´ akov´ a, H., Ergashev, K.E., Souza de Joode, M., Burkhonov, O.A., Ehgamberdiev, S.A., Gal´ ad, A., Vil´ agi, J., Reddy, V., Dyvig, R., Ries, J.G., Snodgrass, C., Donald- son, A., Peixinho, N., Khalouei, E.: Spins and shapes of 11 near-Earth asteroids observed within the NEOROCKS p...

  22. [22]

    In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #46

    Moskovitz, N., Polishook, D., Thomas, C., Willman, M., DeMeo, F., Mommert, M., Endicott, T., Trilling, D., Binzel, R., Hinkle, M., Siu, H., Neugent, K., Chris- tensen, E., Person, M., Burt, B., Grundy, W., Roe, H., Abell, P., Busch, M.: The Mission Accessible Near-Earth Object Survey (MANOS): Project Overview. In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeti...

  23. [23]

    The Mission Accessible Near-Earth Objects Survey (MANOS): first photometric results

    Thirouin, A., Moskovitz, N., Binzel, R.P., Christensen, E., DeMeo, F.E., Person, M.J., Polishook, D., Thomas, C.A., Trilling, D., Willman, M., Hinkle, M., Burt, B., Avner, D., Aceituno, F.J.: The Mission Accessible Near-Earth Objects Survey (MANOS): First Photometric Results. AJ152(6), 163 (2016) https://doi.org/10. 3847/0004-6256/152/6/163 arXiv:1607.035...

  24. [24]

    In: American 24 Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #221

    Massey, P., Dunham, E.W., Bida, T.A., Collins, P., Hall, J.C., Hunter, D.A., Lauman, S., Levine, S., Neugent, K., Nye, R., Oliver, R., Schleicher, D., Zoone- matkermani, S.: As Big and As Good As It Gets: The Large Monolithic Imager for Lowell Observatory’s 4.3-m Discovery Channel Telescope. In: American 24 Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #221. Ame...

  25. [25]

    Arthur, et al., THETHREEHUNDRED Project: ram pressure and gas content of haloes and subhaloes in the phase-space plane

    Devog` ele, M., Ferrais, M., Jehin, E., Moskovitz, N., Skiff, B.A., Levine, S.E., Gustafsson, A., Farnocchia, D., Micheli, M., Snodgrass, C., Borisov, G., Manfroid, J., Moulane, Y., Benkhaldoun, Z., Burdanov, A., Pozuelos, F.J., Gillon, M., de Wit, J., Green, S.F., Bendjoya, P., Rivet, J.-P., Abe, L., Vernet, D., Chandler, C.O., Trujillo, C.A.: (6478) Gau...

  26. [26]

    The Messenger94, 1–6 (1998)

    Appenzeller, I., Fricke, K., F¨ urtig, W., G¨ assler, W., H¨ afner, R., Harke, R., Hess, H.-J., Hummel, W., J¨ urgens, P., Kudritzki, R.-P., Mantel, K.-H., Meisl, W., Muschielok, B., Nicklas, H., Rupprecht, G., Seifert, W., Stahl, O., Szeifert, T., Tarantik, K.: Successful commissioning of FORS1 - the first optical instrument on the VLT. The Messenger94, ...

  27. [27]

    A&A491(3), 941–950 (2008) https://doi.org/ 10.1051/0004-6361:200809910

    Kissler-Patig, M., Pirard, J.-F., Casali, M., Moorwood, A., Ageorges, N., Alves de Oliveira, C., Baksai, P., Bedin, L.R., Bendek, E., Biereichel, P., Delabre, B., Dorn, R., Esteves, R., Finger, G., Gojak, D., Huster, G., Jung, Y., Kiekebush, M., Klein, B., Koch, F., Lizon, J.-L., Mehrgan, L., Petr-Gotzens, M., Pritchard, J., Selman, F., Stegmeier, J.: HAW...

  28. [28]

    Automated data reduction workflows for astronomy

    Freudling, W., Romaniello, M., Bramich, D.M., Ballester, P., Forchi, V., Garc´ ıa- Dabl´ o, C.E., Moehler, S., Neeser, M.J.: Automated data reduction workflows for astronomy. The ESO Reflex environment. A&A559, 96 (2013) https://doi.org/ 10.1051/0004-6361/201322494 arXiv:1311.5411 [astro-ph.IM]

  29. [29]

    Setting UBVRI Photometric Zero-Points Using Sloan Digital Sky Survey ugriz Magnitudes

    Chonis, T.S., Gaskell, C.M.: Setting UBVRI Photometric Zero-Points Using Sloan Digital Sky Survey ugriz Magnitudes. AJ135(1), 264–267 (2008) https://doi. org/10.1088/0004-6256/135/1/264 arXiv:0710.5801 [astro-ph]

  30. [30]

    The Pan-STARRS1 Photometric System

    Tonry, J.L., Stubbs, C.W., Lykke, K.R., Doherty, P., Shivvers, I.S., Burgett, W.S., Chambers, K.C., Hodapp, K.W., Kaiser, N., Kudritzki, R.-P., Magnier, E.A., Morgan, J.S., Price, P.A., Wainscoat, R.J.: The Pan-STARRS1 Photomet- ric System. ApJ750(2), 99 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/99 arXiv:1203.0297 [astro-ph.IM]

  31. [31]

    In: Iye, M., Moorwood, A.F

    Cepa, J., Aguiar, M., Escalera, V.G., Gonzalez-Serrano, I., Joven-Alvarez, E., Peraza, L., Rasilla, J.L., Rodriguez-Ramos, L.F., Gonzalez, J.J., Cobos Duenas, F.J., Sanchez, B., Tejada, C., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Militello, C., Rosa, F.: OSIRIS tunable imager and spectrograph. In: Iye, M., Moorwood, A.F. (eds.) Optical and IR Telescope Instrumentation and De...

  32. [32]

    In: Diego, J.M., Goicoechea, L.J., Gonz´ alez-Serrano, J.I., Gorgas, J

    Cepa, J.: OSIRIS: Final Characterization and Scientific Capabilities. In: Diego, J.M., Goicoechea, L.J., Gonz´ alez-Serrano, J.I., Gorgas, J. (eds.) Highlights of Spanish Astrophysics V. Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, vol. 14, p. 15 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11250-8 2

  33. [33]

    Technical Report NASA/JSC–20182, NASA Johnson Space Center (2012)

    Abell, P.A., Adamo, D., Barbee, B., Johnson, L., Landau, D.: Scientific and Exploration Potential of Human Visits to Near-Earth Objects. Technical Report NASA/JSC–20182, NASA Johnson Space Center (2012). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/ api/citations/20120012804/downloads/20120012804.pdf

  34. [34]

    In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #44

    Christensen, E., Larson, S., Boattini, A., Gibbs, A., Grauer, A., Hill, R., John- son, J., Kowalski, R., McNaught, R.: The Catalina Sky Survey: Current and Future Work. In: AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #44. AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts, vol. 44, pp. 210–13 (2012)

  35. [35]

    AJ104, 340 (1992) https://doi.org/ 10.1086/116242

    Landolt, A.U.: UBVRI Photometric Standard Stars in the Magnitude Range 11.5 <V<16.0 Around the Celestial Equator. AJ104, 340 (1992) https://doi.org/ 10.1086/116242

  36. [36]

    Astronomy and Computing18, 47–53 (2017)

    Mommert, M.: PHOTOMETRYPIPELINE: An automated pipeline for calibrated photometry. Astronomy and Computing18, 47–53 (2017)

  37. [37]

    Yingfan Wang, Haiyang Huang, Cynthia Rudin, and Yaron Shaposhnik

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T.E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Courna- peau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S.J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K.J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A.R.J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C., Polat, I., Feng, Y., Moore, E.W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman...

  38. [38]

    Astrophysical Journal210, 642–646 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1086/154870

    Avni, Y.: Energy spectra of X-ray clusters of galaxies. Astrophysical Journal210, 642–646 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1086/154870

  39. [39]

    Astronomy and Astro- physics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol

    Zappala, V., Cellino, A., Barucci, A., Fulchignoni, M., Lupishko, D.: An analysis of the amplitude-phase relationship among asteroids. Astronomy and Astro- physics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 231, no. 2, May 1990, p. 548-560. Research supported by CNR and MPI.231, 548–560 (1990)

  40. [40]

    A&A66(1-2), 31–36 (1978)

    Surdej, A., Surdej, J.: Asteroid lightcurves simulated by the rotation of a three- axes ellipsoid model. A&A66(1-2), 31–36 (1978)

  41. [41]

    Asteroid lightcurves from the Palomar Transient Factory survey: Rotation periods and phase functions from sparse photometry

    Waszczak, A., Chang, C.-K., Ofek, E.O., Laher, R., Masci, F., Levitan, D., Surace, J., Cheng, Y.-C., Ip, W.-H., Kinoshita, D., Helou, G., Prince, T.A., Kulkarni, S.: Asteroid Light Curves from the Palomar Transient Factory Survey: Rotation Periods and Phase Functions from Sparse Photometry. AJ150(3), 75 (2015) 26 https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/75...

  42. [42]

    A&A656, 126 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1051/0004-6361/202142013 arXiv:2109.11689 [astro-ph.EP]

    Kwiatkowski, T., Kole´ nczuk, P., Kryszczy´ nska, A., Oszkiewicz, D., Kami´ nski, K., Kami´ nska, M.K., Troianskyi, V., Skiff, B., Moskowitz, N., Kashuba, V., Kim, M.-J., Kim, T., Mottola, S., Santana-Ros, T., Kluwak, T., Buzzi, L., Bacci, P., Birtwhistle, P., Miles, R., Chatelain, J.: Photometry and model of near-Earth asteroid 2021 DW1 from one appariti...

  43. [43]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics559, 106 (2013)

    Terai, T., Urakawa, S., Takahashi, J., Yoshida, F., Oshima, G., Aratani, K., Hoshi, H., Sato, T., Ushioda, K., Oasa, Y.: Time-series photometry of Earth flyby asteroid 2012 DA14. Astronomy & Astrophysics559, 106 (2013)

  44. [44]

    In: Binzel, R.P., Gehrels, T., Matthews, M.S

    Bowell, E., Hapke, B., Domingue, D., Lumme, K., Peltoniemi, J., Harris, A.W.: Application of photometric models to asteroids. In: Binzel, R.P., Gehrels, T., Matthews, M.S. (eds.) Asteroids II, pp. 524–556. University of Arizona Press, Tucson (1989)

  45. [45]

    PSS123, 117–125 (2016)

    Penttil¨ a, A., Shevchenko, V., Wilkman, O., Muinonen, K.: H, G1, G2 photometric phase function extended to low-accuracy data. PSS123, 117–125 (2016)

  46. [46]

    Icarus209(2), 542–555 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2010

    Muinonen, K., Belskaya, I.N., Cellino, A., Delb` o, M., Levasseur-Regourd, A.- C., Penttil¨ a, A., Tedesco, E.F.: A three-parameter magnitude phase function for asteroids. Icarus209(2), 542–555 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2010. 04.003

  47. [47]

    Astronomy and Computing30, 100381 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2019.100381

    Mommert, M., Moskovitz, N.A., Farnocchia, D., al.:sbpy: a Python module for small-body planetary astronomy. Astronomy and Computing30, 100381 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ascom.2019.100381

  48. [48]

    Icarus354, 114094 (2021)

    Mahlke, M., Carry, B., Denneau, L.: Asteroid phase curves from ATLAS dual- band photometry. Icarus354, 114094 (2021)

  49. [49]

    In: Asteroids, Comets, Meteors Conference

    Vega, N., Devog` ele, M.: Determination of H Magnitude of NEOs by Applying Bayesian Methods on ATLAS Data. In: Asteroids, Comets, Meteors Conference. LPI Contributions, vol. 2851, p. 2590 (2023)

  50. [50]

    A., Schlafly, E

    Magnier, E.A., Schlafly, E.F., Finkbeiner, D.P., Tonry, J.L., Goldman, B., R¨ oser, S., Schilbach, E., Casertano, S., Chambers, K.C., Flewelling, H.A., Huber, M.E., Price, P.A., Sweeney, W.E., Waters, C.Z., Denneau, L., Draper, P.W., Hodapp, K.W., Jedicke, R., Kaiser, N., Kudritzki, R.-P., Metcalfe, N., Stubbs, C.W., Wainscoat, R.J.: Pan-STARRS Photometri...

  51. [51]

    The Eighth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: First Data from SDSS-III

    Aihara, H., Allende Prieto, C., An, D., Anderson, S.F., Aubourg, ´E., Balbinot, E., 27 Beers, T.C., Berlind, A.A., Bickerton, S.J., Bizyaev, D., Blanton, M.R., Bochan- ski, J.J., Bolton, A.S., Bovy, J., Brandt, W.N., Brinkmann, J., Brown, P.J., Brownstein, J.R., Busca, N.G., Campbell, H., Carr, M.A., Chen, Y., Chiappini, C., Comparat, J., Connolly, N., Co...

  52. [52]

    Astronomische Nachrichten: Astronomical Notes326(5), 321–331 (2005)

    Bilir, S., Karaali, S., Tun¸ cel, S.: Absolute magnitudes for late-type dwarf stars for Sloan photometry. Astronomische Nachrichten: Astronomical Notes326(5), 321–331 (2005)

  53. [53]

    The Astronomical Journal132(3), 989 (2006)

    Rodgers, C.T., Canterna, R., Smith, J.A., Pierce, M.J., Tucker, D.L.: Improved u’ g’ r’ i’ z’ to UBVRCIC transformation equations for main-sequence stars. The Astronomical Journal132(3), 989 (2006)

  54. [54]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society367(2), 449–453 (2006) 28

    Holmberg, J., Flynn, C., Portinari, L.: The colours of the Sun. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society367(2), 449–453 (2006) 28

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Skrutskie, M.F., Cutri, R.M., Stiening, R., Weinberg, M.D., Schneider, S., Car- penter, J.M., Beichman, C., Capps, R., Chester, T., Elias, J., Huchra, J., Liebert, J., Lonsdale, C., Monet, D.G., Price, S., Seitzer, P., Jarrett, T., Kirkpatrick, J.D., Gizis, J.E., Howard, E., Evans, T., Fowler, J., Fullmer, L., Hurt, R., Light, R., Kopan, E.L., Marsh, K.A....

  56. [56]

    The Messenger183, 20–23 (2021)

    Coccato, L., Freudling, W., Retzlaff, J.: Colour Transformations for ESO Near- Infrared Imagers. The Messenger183, 20–23 (2021)

  57. [57]

    The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series236(2), 47 (2018)

    Willmer, C.N.: The absolute magnitude of the sun in several filters. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series236(2), 47 (2018)

  58. [58]

    Icarus202(1), 160–180 (2009)

    DeMeo, F.E., Binzel, R.P., Slivan, S.M., Bus, S.J.: An extension of the Bus asteroid taxonomy into the near-infrared. Icarus202(1), 160–180 (2009)

  59. [59]

    In: EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019, vol

    Chodas, P.: Overview of the 2019 Planetary Defense Conference Asteroid Impact Exercise. In: EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019, vol. 2019, pp. 2019–1919 (2019)

  60. [60]

    Icarus326, 133–150 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.02.018

    Reddy, V., Kelley, M.S., Farnocchia, D., Ryan, W.H., Thomas, C.A., Benner, L.A.M., Dotson, J., Micheli, M., Brucker, M.J., Bus, S.J., Brozovic, M., Wheeler, L., Abbasi, V., Bauer, J.M., Bonsall, A., Brown, Z.L., Busch, M.W., Chodas, P., Choi, Y.-J., Erasmus, N., Fast, K.E., Faucher, J.P., Fernandes, R.B., Ghigo, F.D., Gilbank, D.G., Giorgini, J.D., Gustaf...

  61. [61]

    PSJ3(5), 123 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ac66eb

    Reddy, V., Kelley, M.S., Dotson, J., Farnocchia, D., Erasmus, N., Polishook, D., Masiero, J., Benner, L.A.M., Bauer, J., Alarcon, M.R., Balam, D., Bamberger, D., Bell, D., Barnardi, F., Bressi, T.H., Brozovic, M., Brucker, M.J., Buzzi, L., Cano, J., Cantillo, D., Cennamo, R., Chastel, S., Chingis, O., Choi, Y.-J., Chris- tensen, E., Denneau, L., Dr´ o˙ zd...

  62. [62]

    Icarus374, 114790 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2021

    Reddy, V., Kelley, M.S., Dotson, J., Landis, R.R., McGraw, L.E., Micheli, M., Moskovitz, N.A., Sanchez, J.A., Taylor, P.A., Wheeler, L., Bauer, J.M., Brucker, M.J., Devog` ele, M., Emery, J.P., Hainaut, O., Hickson, D.C., Koschny, D., Larsen, J.A., Marshall, S.E., McMillan, R., Skiff, B.A., Venditti, F.C.F., Virkki, A.K., Yang, B., Zambrano-Marin, L.F.: N...

  63. [63]

    PSJ 5(6), 141 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ad4a6d

    Reddy, V., Kelley, M.S., Benner, L., Dotson, J., Erasmus, N., Farnocchia, D., Linder, T., Masiero, J.R., Thomas, C., Bauer, J., Alarcon, M.R., Bacci, P., Bam- berger, D., Battle, A., Benkhaldoun, Z., Betti, G., Birlan, M., Brozovic, M., Burt, B., Cantillo, D.C., Chandra, S., Chomette, G., Coates, A., DeMeo, F., Devog` ele, M., Fatka, P., Ferrais, M., Fini...

  64. [64]

    PSJ3(7), 156 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Farnocchia, D., Reddy, V., Bauer, J.M., Warner, E.M., Micheli, M., Payne, M.J., Farnham, T., Kelley, M.S., Balam, D.D., Barkov, A.P., Berte¸ steanu, D., Birlan, M., Bolin, B.T., Brucker, M.J., Buzzi, L., Chambers, K.C., Demetz, L., Djupvik, A.A., Elenin, L., Fini, P., Flynn, R., Galli, G., Gao, X., G¸ edek, M., Granvik, M., Hasubick, W., Ivanov, A.L., Iva...

  65. [65]

    PSJ4(11), 203 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/acfd22

    Farnocchia, D., Reddy, V., Bauer, J.M., Warner, E.M., Micheli, M., Payne, M.J., Farnham, T., Kelley, M.S., Alarcon, M.R., Bacci, P., Bacci, R., Bachini, M., Bailli´ e, K., Baj, G., Bamberger, D., Barkov, A.P., Beck, S., Betti, G., Biancalani, E., Bolin, B.T., Briggs, D., Buzzi, L., Cheng, H., Christensen, E., Coffano, A., Conversi, L., Demeautis, C., Denn...

  66. [66]

    , year = 2000, month = nov, volume = 148, pages =

    Pravec, P., Harris, A.W.: Fast and Slow Rotation of Asteroids. Icarus148(1), 12–20 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2000.6482

  67. [67]

    The Strength of Regolith and Rubble Pile Asteroids

    S´ anchez, P., Scheeres, D.J.: The strength of regolith and rubble pile asteroids. Meteorit. Planet. Sci.49(5), 788–811 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.12293 arXiv:1306.1622 [astro-ph.EP]

  68. [68]

    2017, A&A, 607, A24, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 201730852

    Berthier, J., Carry, B., Mahlke, M., Normand, J.: SsODNet: Solar system Open Database Network. A&A671, 151 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/ 202244878 arXiv:2209.10697 [astro-ph.EP]

  69. [69]

    Icarus187(2), 500–509 (2007)

    Holsapple, K.A.: Spin limits of Solar System bodies: From the small fast-rotators to 2003 EL61. Icarus187(2), 500–509 (2007)

  70. [70]

    Icarus269, 50–61 (2016) https://doi.org/10

    Bruck Syal, M., Michael Owen, J., Miller, P.L.: Deflection by kinetic impact: Sensitivity to asteroid properties. Icarus269, 50–61 (2016) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.icarus.2016.01.010

  71. [71]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics626, 87 (2019)

    Shevchenko, V.G., Belskaya, I.N., Mikhalchenko, O.I., Muinonen, K., Penttil¨ a, A., Gritsevich, M., Shkuratov, Y.G., Slyusarev, I.G., Videen, G.: Phase integral of asteroids. Astronomy & Astrophysics626, 87 (2019)

  72. [72]

    Dunn, T.L., McSween, J. Harry Y. jr., McCoy, T.J., Cressey, G.: Analysis of ordinary chondrites using powder X-ray diffraction: 2. Applications to ordinary chondrite parent-body processes. Meteoritics and Planetary Science45(1), 135– 156 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2009.01012.x

  73. [73]

    Science 333(6046), 1113 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207758

    Nakamura, T., Noguchi, T., Tanaka, M., Zolensky, M.E., Kimura, M., Tsuchiyama, A., Nakato, A., Ogami, T., Ishida, H., Uesugi, M., Yada, T., Shirai, 31 K., Fujimura, A., Okazaki, R., Sandford, S.A., Ishibashi, Y., Abe, M., Okada, T., Ueno, M., Mukai, T., Yoshikawa, M., Kawaguchi, J.: Itokawa Dust Parti- cles: A Direct Link Between S-Type Asteroids and Ordi...

  74. [74]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science38(8), 1161–1180 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00305.x

    Britt, D.T., Consolmagno, G.J.: Stony meteorite porosities and densities: A review of the data through 2001. Meteoritics & Planetary Science38(8), 1161–1180 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2003.tb00305.x

  75. [75]

    Meteoritics23, 256–257 (1988)

    Bell, J.F.: A Probable Asteroidal Parent Body for the CV or CO Chondrites. Meteoritics23, 256–257 (1988)

  76. [76]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science36(2), 245–253 (2001) https://doi

    Burbine, T.H., Binzel, R.P., Bus, S.J., Clark, B.E.: K Asteroids and CO3/CV3 Chondrites. Meteoritics & Planetary Science36(2), 245–253 (2001) https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2001.tb01869.x

  77. [77]

    Meteoritics & Planetary Science46(12), 1842–1862 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01298.x

    Macke, R.J., Consolmagno, G.J., Britt, D.T.: Density, porosity, and magnetic sus- ceptibility of carbonaceous chondrites. Meteoritics & Planetary Science46(12), 1842–1862 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2011.01298.x

  78. [78]

    arXiv e-prints, 2506–11217 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.11217 arXiv:2506.11217 [astro-ph.EP] 32

    Wiegert, P., Brown, P., Lopes, J., Connors, M.: The Potential Danger to Satellites due to Ejecta from a 2032 Lunar Impact by Asteroid 2024 YR4. arXiv e-prints, 2506–11217 (2025) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.11217 arXiv:2506.11217 [astro-ph.EP] 32