pith. sign in

arxiv: 2511.11457 · v2 · pith:F6I3RFIGnew · submitted 2025-11-14 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph

Analytic structure of the high-energy gravitational amplitude: multi-H diagrams and classical 5PM logarithms

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 18:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-ph
keywords gravitational scatteringhigh-energy limitRegge regimepost-Minkowskian expansionmulti-H diagramseikonal phasedispersion relationsloop amplitudes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multi-H diagrams produce the leading double logarithm in gravitational scattering at 5PM order.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines two-body gravitational scattering in the high-energy small-angle limit. It applies power counting arguments and dispersion relations inside an effective field theory for the Regge regime to show how leading Regge logarithms appear as a power series in t/s. The authors isolate the tower of multi-H diagrams that control the dominant logarithmic terms and compute the leading double logarithm at four loops, which is 5PM order. They verify this result by independent calculation in the multi-Regge expansion. Dispersion relations are then used to extract the single-logarithmic piece of the imaginary part of the eikonal phase at the same order in the Regge limit.

Core claim

In the high-energy small-angle limit of gravitational two-body scattering, power counting and dispersion relations in an effective field theory for the Regge regime determine that the leading Regge logarithms arise as a power series in t/s from a tower of multi-H diagrams. The leading double logarithm is computed explicitly at four loops (5PM) and agrees between the effective field theory method and the multi-Regge expansion. Dispersion relations then give the single logarithmic contribution to the imaginary part of the eikonal phase at 5PM in the Regge limit.

What carries the argument

The tower of multi-H diagrams that govern the leading logarithmic behavior, together with dispersion relations in the Regge effective field theory.

If this is right

  • The analytic structure of the amplitude at higher loop orders is fixed by the same class of multi-H diagrams.
  • Agreement between effective field theory and multi-Regge methods supports using either for logarithmic terms at 5PM and beyond.
  • The single logarithmic term in the imaginary part of the eikonal phase is accessible at 5PM via dispersion relations.
  • Classical 5PM logarithms in gravitational scattering are determined by this loop expansion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dispersion relations could isolate subleading logarithms at higher post-Minkowskian orders.
  • The framework may extend to resummation of the full tower of Regge logarithms in the eikonal phase.
  • Similar power-counting techniques could apply to high-energy scattering in other long-range force theories.

Load-bearing premise

Power counting arguments and dispersion relations remain valid in the effective field theory for the Regge regime, allowing the expansion in powers of t/s to capture the leading logarithmic behavior without additional non-perturbative effects.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the coefficient of the leading double logarithm computed from four-loop multi-H diagrams in effective field theory and the corresponding multi-Regge expansion result would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.11457 by Emanuele Rosi, Francesco Alessio, Ira Z. Rothstein, Michael Saavedra, Riccardo Gonzo, Vittorio Del Duca.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Vertical and horizontal wavy lines denote [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Momenta parametrisation for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The scalar massless kite integral topology [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the high-energy, small-angle limit of two-body gravitational scattering. Using power counting arguments and dispersion relations in an effective field theory for the Regge regime, we derive the general loop expansion that determines how the leading Regge logarithms and their complex structure arise as a power series in $t/s$. Focusing on the tower of multi-H diagrams that govern the leading logarithmic behavior, we compute the leading double logarithm at four loops (5PM) using both effective field theory methods and the multi-Regge expansion, finding complete agreement. Finally, using the aforementioned dispersion relations, we extract the single logarithmic contribution to the imaginary part of the eikonal phase at 5PM in the Regge limit.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the high-energy, small-angle limit of two-body gravitational scattering. Using power counting arguments and dispersion relations in an effective field theory for the Regge regime, the authors derive the general loop expansion for leading Regge logarithms as a power series in t/s. Focusing on multi-H diagrams, they compute the leading double logarithm at four loops (5PM) via both EFT methods and the multi-Regge expansion, reporting complete agreement. They then apply the dispersion relations to extract the single logarithmic contribution to the imaginary part of the eikonal phase at 5PM in the Regge limit.

Significance. If the results hold, this advances understanding of the analytic structure and logarithmic tower in high-energy gravitational amplitudes. The explicit 5PM double-log computation with complete agreement between two independent methods (EFT and multi-Regge) is a clear strength, as is the parameter-free derivation grounded in dispersion relations and power counting. This provides a concrete benchmark for classical 5PM effects and could inform eikonal resummations.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (power counting for multi-H diagrams): The argument that these diagrams alone govern the leading double logarithm at 5PM relies on the t/s expansion cleanly isolating the log tower; a more explicit demonstration that other diagram classes do not contribute at the same order in the Regge regime would be needed to fully support the isolation step before the extraction.
  2. [§5] §5, dispersion relation (around Eq. (12)): The extraction of the single-log imaginary part assumes the analytic structure (branch cuts and residues) is fully captured by the stated power counting without subleading non-perturbative contributions; if this assumption is incomplete, the 5PM single-log term could receive uncontrolled corrections, directly affecting the final claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction could more clearly distinguish the double-log computation (which has the two-method agreement) from the single-log extraction (which relies on the dispersion step).
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the eikonal phase and its imaginary part should be defined consistently when first introduced to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the manuscript's significance and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below with clarifications grounded in the paper's EFT power counting and dispersion relations framework, and indicate the revisions incorporated.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (power counting for multi-H diagrams): The argument that these diagrams alone govern the leading double logarithm at 5PM relies on the t/s expansion cleanly isolating the log tower; a more explicit demonstration that other diagram classes do not contribute at the same order in the Regge regime would be needed to fully support the isolation step before the extraction.

    Authors: We agree that an expanded demonstration improves clarity. In the revised manuscript we have augmented §4 with an explicit classification of diagram topologies in the Regge EFT. Using the established power-counting rules (where each additional graviton exchange or non-multi-H topology introduces extra factors of t/s or suppresses the double-logarithmic enhancement), we show that only the multi-H class contributes to the leading O((t/s)^0 log^2) term at four loops. This classification is now presented with a table summarizing the scaling of representative non-multi-H diagrams, confirming they enter only at subleading orders in the t/s expansion. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5, dispersion relation (around Eq. (12)): The extraction of the single-log imaginary part assumes the analytic structure (branch cuts and residues) is fully captured by the stated power counting without subleading non-perturbative contributions; if this assumption is incomplete, the 5PM single-log term could receive uncontrolled corrections, directly affecting the final claim.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on the robustness of the analytic assumptions. The dispersion relations are applied strictly within the perturbative Regge EFT, where the power counting isolates the leading branch-cut structure generated by the multi-H diagrams. Subleading non-perturbative contributions (e.g., from instantons or non-perturbative Regge poles) are exponentially suppressed in the high-energy limit and do not affect the perturbative single-log term at fixed loop order. We have added a clarifying paragraph in §5 that makes this separation explicit and notes consistency with the independent multi-Regge computation, which reproduces the same single-log coefficient without invoking the dispersion relations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses external EFT power counting and dispersion relations with independent multi-Regge cross-check

full rationale

The paper derives the general loop expansion for leading Regge logarithms via power counting and dispersion relations in the Regge-regime EFT, then explicitly computes the four-loop double logarithm using both EFT methods and the multi-Regge expansion, reporting agreement. The single-log imaginary part is extracted from the same dispersion relations. No quoted step reduces a reported result to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation chain; the central extraction is cross-validated by an independent expansion and remains falsifiable against external benchmarks. This is the normal non-circular outcome for a computation grounded in prior literature assumptions rather than tautological redefinition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard domain assumptions of effective field theory in the Regge regime and dispersion relations; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Power counting arguments determine the general loop expansion for leading Regge logarithms in the effective field theory for the Regge regime
    Invoked to derive how logarithms arise as a power series in t/s.
  • domain assumption Dispersion relations apply in the high-energy small-angle limit to extract imaginary parts of the eikonal phase
    Used to obtain the single logarithmic contribution at 5PM.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5670 in / 1493 out tokens · 46541 ms · 2026-05-21T18:15:17.469029+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Squeezed-state radiation in shockwave scattering: QCD-Gravity double copy

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The n-particle gluon radiation spectrum in shockwave scattering is a generalized Susskind-Glogower squeezed coherent state, and multi-graviton radiation follows similarly via double copy, with feasible large squeezing...

  2. The Classical Gravitational Impulse at High Energies

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The gravitational impulse for ultrarelativistic massive scalars is resummed to all orders in G_N at fixed G_N s/mb, recovering post-Minkowski results and predicting the leading high-energy behavior to eleventh post-Mi...

  3. The double-logarithmic four-graviton Regge sector as a rank-two twisted period system

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The Mellin partial wave for four-graviton scattering in supergravity is recast as a rank-two twisted period system of weighted integrals that satisfy first-order differential equations and a recursion with the number ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Relevant master integrals Thegeneralised bubbleintegrals are defined as Λa,b(q⊥) = Z l⊥ 1 [(q−l) 2 ⊥]a[l2 ⊥]b =c a,b(q2 ⊥) d 2 −a−b, ca,b = 1 (4π) d 2 Γ(a+b− d 2) Γ(a)Γ(b) Γ( d 2 −a)Γ( d 2 −b) Γ(d−a−b) ,(A1a) whereas thevector bubbleintegrals are Λi a,b(q⊥) = Z l⊥ li ⊥ [(q−l) 2 ⊥]a[l2 ⊥]b = qi ⊥ 2 [Λa,b(q⊥) + 1 q2 ⊥ Λa,b−1(q⊥)−Λ a−1,b(q⊥) ].(A2) Using eq....

  2. [2]

    An introduction to the perturbative QCD pomeron and to jet physics at large rapidities

    V. Del Duca, An introduction to the perturbative QCD pomeron and to jet physics at large rapidities, (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9503226

  3. [3]

    Del Duca and L

    V. Del Duca and L. J. Dixon, The SAGEX review on scat- tering amplitudes Chapter 15: The multi-Regge limit, J. Phys. A55, 443016 (2022), arXiv:2203.13026 [hep-th]

  4. [4]

    Raj and R

    H. Raj and R. Venugopalan, QCD-Gravity double copy in Regge asymptotics: from 2→namplitudes to radiation in shockwave collisions (2025) arXiv:2507.21252 [hep-th]

  5. [5]

    L. N. Lipatov, POMERON IN QUANTUM CHROMO- DYNAMICS, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.5, 411 (1989)

  6. [6]

    L. N. Lipatov, Reggeization of the Vector Meson and the Vacuum Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.23, 338 (1976)

  7. [7]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, Multi - Reggeon Processes in the Yang-Mills Theory, Sov. Phys. JETP44, 443 (1976)

  8. [8]

    E. A. Kuraev, L. N. Lipatov, and V. S. Fadin, The Pomer- anchuk Singularity in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Sov. Phys. JETP45, 199 (1977)

  9. [9]

    I. I. Balitsky and L. N. Lipatov, The Pomeranchuk Singu- larity in Quantum Chromodynamics, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 28, 822 (1978)

  10. [10]

    L. N. Lipatov, High-energy asymptotics of multicolor QCD and two-dimensional conformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B309, 394 (1993)

  11. [11]

    L. N. Lipatov, Integrability of scattering amplitudes in N=4 SUSY, J. Phys. A42, 304020 (2009), arXiv:0902.1444 [hep-th]

  12. [12]

    L. N. Lipatov, Asymptotic behavior of multicolor QCD at high energies in connection with exactly solvable spin models, JETP Lett.59, 596 (1994), arXiv:hep- th/9311037

  13. [13]

    L. D. Faddeev and G. P. Korchemsky, High-energy QCD as a completely integrable model, Phys. Lett. B342, 311 (1995), arXiv:hep-th/9404173

  14. [14]

    J.-y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill, and I. Z. Rothstein, The Rapidity Renormalization Group, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 151601 (2012), arXiv:1104.0881 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    J.-Y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill, and I. Z. Rothstein, A Formalism for the Systematic Treatment of Rapidity Logarithms in Quantum Field Theory, JHEP05, 084, arXiv:1202.0814 [hep-ph]

  16. [16]

    I. Z. Rothstein and I. W. Stewart, An Effective Field The- ory for Forward Scattering and Factorization Violation, JHEP08, 025, arXiv:1601.04695 [hep-ph]

  17. [17]

    Balitsky, Operator expansion for high-energy scat- tering, Nucl

    I. Balitsky, Operator expansion for high-energy scat- tering, Nucl. Phys. B463, 99 (1996), arXiv:hep- ph/9509348

  18. [18]

    Y. V. Kovchegov, Small-xf 2 structure function of a nu- cleus including multiple pomeron exchanges, Phys. Rev. D60, 034008 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9901281

  19. [19]

    The Renormalization Group Equation for the Color Glass Condensate

    E. Iancu, A. Leonidov, and L. McLerran, The renormal- ization group equation for the color glass condensate, Phys. Lett. B510, 133 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0102009

  20. [20]

    & Veneziano, G

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, The gravitational eikonal: From parti- cle, string and brane collisions to black-hole encounters, Phys. Rept.1083, 1 (2024), arXiv:2306.16488 [hep-th]

  21. [21]

    L. N. Lipatov, GRAVITON REGGEIZATION, Phys. Lett. B116, 411 (1982)

  22. [22]

    Double-logarithms in Einstein-Hilbert gravity and supergravity

    J. Bartels, L. N. Lipatov, and A. Sabio Vera, Double- logarithms in Einstein-Hilbert gravity and supergravity, JHEP07, 056, arXiv:1208.3423 [hep-th]

  23. [23]

    Wilson line approach to gravity in the high energy limit

    S. Melville, S. G. Naculich, H. J. Schnitzer, and C. D. White, Wilson line approach to gravity in the high energy limit, Phys. Rev. D89, 025009 (2014), arXiv:1306.6019 10 [hep-th]

  24. [24]

    I. Z. Rothstein and M. Saavedra, A Systematic La- grangian Formulation for Quantum and Classical Gravity at High Energies, (2024), arXiv:2412.04428 [hep-th]

  25. [25]

    Britto, R

    R. Britto, R. Gonzo, and G. R. Jehu, Graviton parti- cle statistics and coherent states from classical scattering amplitudes, JHEP03, 214, arXiv:2112.07036 [hep-th]

  26. [26]

    Cristofoli, R

    A. Cristofoli, R. Gonzo, N. Moynihan, D. O’Connell, A. Ross, M. Sergola, and C. D. White, The uncer- tainty principle and classical amplitudes, JHEP06, 181, arXiv:2112.07556 [hep-th]

  27. [27]

    L. N. Lipatov, Multi - Regge Processes in Gravitation, Sov. Phys. JETP55, 582 (1982)

  28. [28]

    Amati, M

    D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, Higher Or- der Gravitational Deflection and Soft Bremsstrahlung in Planckian Energy Superstring Collisions, Nucl. Phys. B 347, 550 (1990)

  29. [29]

    Amati, M

    D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, Effective ac- tion and all order gravitational eikonal at Planckian en- ergies, Nucl. Phys. B403, 707 (1993)

  30. [30]

    Towards an S-matrix Description of Gravitational Collapse

    D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni, and G. Veneziano, Towards an S-matrix description of gravitational collapse, JHEP02, 049, arXiv:0712.1209 [hep-th]

  31. [31]

    Unified limiting form of graviton radiation at extreme energies

    M. Ciafaloni, D. Colferai, F. Coradeschi, and G. Veneziano, Unified limiting form of graviton ra- diation at extreme energies, Phys. Rev. D93, 044052 (2016), arXiv:1512.00281 [hep-th]

  32. [32]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Conservative Black Hole Scattering at Fifth Post-Minkowskian and First Self- Force Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 241402 (2024), arXiv:2403.07781 [hep-th]

  33. [33]

    Emergence of Calabi-Yau manifolds in high-precision black hole scattering

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Emergence of Calabi–Yau manifolds in high-precision black-hole scattering, Nature641, 603 (2025), arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]

  34. [34]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Local- in-Time Conservative Binary Dynamics at Fifth Post- Minkowskian and First Self-Force Orders, (2025), arXiv:2506.20665 [hep-th]

  35. [35]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, V. A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng, Second-order self- force potential-region binary dynamics atO(G 5) in su- pergravity, (2025), arXiv:2509.17412 [hep-th]

  36. [36]

    Alessio, V

    F. Alessio, V. Del Duca, R. Gonzo, and E. Rosi, (2025), in preparation

  37. [37]

    P. D. B. Collins,An Introduction to Regge Theory and High Energy Physics(Cambridge University Press, 1977)

  38. [38]

    & Veneziano, G

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, The eikonal approach to gravitational scattering and radiation atO(G 3), JHEP07, 169, arXiv:2104.03256 [hep-th]

  39. [39]

    H¨ aring and A

    K. H¨ aring and A. Zhiboedov, What is the graviton pole made of?, (2024), arXiv:2410.21499 [hep-th]

  40. [40]

    Caron-Huot, D

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Maz´ aˇ c, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons- Duffin, Sharp boundaries for the swampland, JHEP07, 110, arXiv:2102.08951 [hep-th]

  41. [41]

    Caron-Huot, D

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Maz´ aˇ c, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons- Duffin, AdS bulk locality from sharp CFT bounds, JHEP 11, 164, arXiv:2106.10274 [hep-th]

  42. [42]

    Chang and J

    C.-H. Chang and J. Parra-Martinez, Graviton loops and negativity, JHEP08, 175, arXiv:2501.17949 [hep-th]

  43. [43]

    Caron-Huot, Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Causality constraints on corrections to einstein gravity, JHEP05, 122, arXiv:2201.06602 [hep- th]

  44. [44]

    H¨ aring and A

    K. H¨ aring and A. Zhiboedov, Gravitational Regge bounds, SciPost Phys.16, 034 (2024), arXiv:2202.08280 [hep-th]

  45. [45]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, Universality of ultra-relativistic gravita- tional scattering, Phys. Lett. B811, 135924 (2020), arXiv:2008.12743 [hep-th]

  46. [46]

    C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, and M. E. Luke, Summing Sudakov logarithms inB→X sγin effective field theory., Phys. Rev. D63, 014006 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0005275

  47. [47]

    C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D65, 054022 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0109045

  48. [48]

    C. W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, and I. W. Stewart, An Effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays, Phys. Rev. D63, 114020 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0011336

  49. [49]

    Soft-collinear gravity

    M. Beneke and G. Kirilin, Soft-collinear gravity, JHEP 09, 066, arXiv:1207.4926 [hep-ph]

  50. [50]

    Soft collinear effective theory for gravity

    T. Okui and A. Yunesi, Soft collinear effective the- ory for gravity, Phys. Rev. D97, 066011 (2018), arXiv:1710.07685 [hep-th]

  51. [51]

    Beneke, P

    M. Beneke, P. Hager, and R. Szafron, Soft-collinear grav- ity beyond the leading power, JHEP03, 080, [Erratum: JHEP 04, 141 (2024)], arXiv:2112.04983 [hep-ph]

  52. [52]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, Ampli- tudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering, JHEP02, 137, arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]

  53. [53]

    Levy and J

    M. Levy and J. Sucher, Eikonal approximation in quan- tum field theory, Phys. Rev.186, 1656 (1969)

  54. [54]

    Akhoury, R

    R. Akhoury, R. Saotome, and G. Sterman, High Energy Scattering in Perturbative Quantum Gravity at Next to Leading Power, Phys. Rev. D103, 064036 (2021), arXiv:1308.5204 [hep-th]

  55. [55]

    Y. Du, S. Ajith, R. Rajagopal, and D. Vaman, World- line proof of eikonal exponentiation, JHEP09, 161, arXiv:2409.12895 [hep-th]

  56. [56]

    Di Vecchia, S

    P. Di Vecchia, S. G. Naculich, R. Russo, G. Veneziano, and C. D. White, A tale of two exponentiations inN = 8 supergravity at subleading level, JHEP03, 173, arXiv:1911.11716 [hep-th]

  57. [57]

    A. Gao, I. Moult, S. Raman, G. Ridgway, and I. W. Stew- art, A collinear perspective on the Regge limit, JHEP05, 328, arXiv:2401.00931 [hep-ph]

  58. [58]

    I. Z. Rothstein and M. Saavedra, Relations between anomalous dimensions in the Regge limit, JHEP07, 073, arXiv:2410.06283 [hep-ph]

  59. [59]

    Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Scattering amplitudes and the con- servative hamiltonian for binary systems at third post- minkowskian order, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201603 (2019), arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

  60. [60]

    Classical and quantum scattering in post- Minkowskian gravity

    T. Damour, Classical and quantum scattering in post- Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D102, 024060 (2020), arXiv:1912.02139 [gr-qc]

  61. [61]

    Parra-Martinez, M

    J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, Extremal black hole scattering atO(G 3): graviton dominance, eikonal exponentiation, and differential equations, JHEP 11, 023, arXiv:2005.04236 [hep-th]

  62. [62]

    & Porto, R

    G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Conservative Dynam- 11 ics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 261103 (2020), arXiv:2007.04977 [hep-th]

  63. [63]

    Damour, Radiative contribution to classical gravita- tional scattering at the third order inG, Phys

    T. Damour, Radiative contribution to classical gravita- tional scattering at the third order inG, Phys. Rev. D 102, 124008 (2020), arXiv:2010.01641 [gr-qc]

  64. [64]

    Herrmann, J

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, Radiative classical gravitational observables atO(G 3) from scattering amplitudes, JHEP10, 148, arXiv:2104.03957 [hep-th]

  65. [65]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini, and C. Wen, Classical gravitational scattering from a gauge-invariant double copy, JHEP10, 118, arXiv:2108.04216 [hep-th]

  66. [66]

    Z. Bern, H. Ita, J. Parra-Martinez, and M. S. Ruf, Universality in the classical limit of massless gravita- tional scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 031601 (2020), arXiv:2002.02459 [hep-th]

  67. [67]

    Cheung and M

    C. Cheung and M. P. Solon, Classical gravitational scat- tering atO(G 3) from Feynman diagrams, JHEP06, 144, arXiv:2003.08351 [hep-th]

  68. [68]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plant´ e, and P. Vanhove, The amplitude for classical gravitational scattering at third Post-Minkowskian order, JHEP08, 172, arXiv:2105.05218 [hep-th]

  69. [69]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plant´ e, and P. Vanhove, Classical gravity from loop amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D104, 026009 (2021), arXiv:2104.04510 [hep- th]

  70. [70]

    When does the gluon reggeize?

    S. Caron-Huot, When does the gluon reggeize?, JHEP 05, 093, arXiv:1309.6521 [hep-th]

  71. [71]

    A. V. Kotikov and S. Teber, Two-loop fermion self-energy in reduced quantum electrodynamics and application to the ultrarelativistic limit of graphene, Phys. Rev. D89, 065038 (2014), arXiv:1312.2430 [hep-ph]

  72. [72]

    K. G. Chetyrkin, A. L. Kataev, and F. V. Tkachov, New Approach to Evaluation of Multiloop Feynman Integrals: The Gegenbauer Polynomial x Space Technique, Nucl. Phys. B174, 345 (1980)

  73. [73]

    A. V. Kotikov, The Gegenbauer polynomial technique: The Evaluation of a class of Feynman diagrams, Phys. Lett. B375, 240 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9512270

  74. [74]

    A. V. Kotikov and S. Teber, Multi-loop techniques for massless Feynman diagram calculations, Phys. Part. Nucl.50, 1 (2019), arXiv:1805.05109 [hep-th]

  75. [75]

    Two-parton scattering in the high-energy limit

    S. Caron-Huot, E. Gardi, and L. Vernazza, Two-parton scattering in the high-energy limit, JHEP06, 016, arXiv:1701.05241 [hep-ph]

  76. [76]

    I. Z. Rothstein and M. Saavedra, Extracting the asymp- totic behavior of S-matrix elements from their phases, JHEP11, 155, arXiv:2312.03676 [hep-th]

  77. [77]

    & Rettegno, P

    T. Damour and P. Rettegno, Strong-field scattering of two black holes: Numerical relativity meets post- Minkowskian gravity, Phys. Rev. D107, 064051 (2023), arXiv:2211.01399 [gr-qc]

  78. [78]

    & Pompili, L

    A. Buonanno, G. Mogull, R. Patil, and L. Pompili, Post- Minkowskian Theory Meets the Spinning Effective-One- Body Approach for Bound-Orbit Waveforms, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 211402 (2024), arXiv:2405.19181 [gr-qc]

  79. [79]

    & Porto, R

    C. Dlapa, G. K¨ alin, Z. Liu, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, Radiation Reaction and Gravitational Waves at Fourth Post-Minkowskian Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 101401 (2023), arXiv:2210.05541 [hep-th]

  80. [80]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Radiated momen- tum and radiation reaction in gravitational two-body scattering including time-asymmetric effects, Phys. Rev. D107, 024012 (2023), arXiv:2210.07165 [gr-qc]

Showing first 80 references.