Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 46 references

Signatures of a bilayer structure in the photoelectron spectrum of B$_{80}^-$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A bilayer B80 cluster, not a hollow cage, may explain the measured photoelectron spectrum of B80⁻.

desk verdict New bilayer candidate for B80, solidly characterized; the claimed PES support doesn't discriminate it from the existing buckyball. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.13172 v2 pith:3DQICBVX submitted 2025-11-17 physics.atm-clus cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yi-Sha Chen , Jing-Jing Guo , Peng-Bo Liu , Hui-Yan Zhao , Jing Wang , Ying Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atm-cluscond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 36.40.-c33.60.+q31.15.E
keywords boronclustersB80bilayerstructurephotoelectronspectroscopydensityfunctionaltheoryaromaticityabinitiomoleculardynamicsfullerenes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that the B80⁻ cluster recently observed by photoelectron spectroscopy is a D3h-symmetric bilayer—two quasi-planar boron layers joined by three interlayer bonds—rather than the previously assumed fullerene-like cage. The simulated spectrum of this bilayer reproduces the experimental X, A, and B bands with vertical detachment energies within 0.04 eV, and the structure is energetically competitive with the core-shell, buckyball, and volleyball isomers. Ab initio molecular dynamics shows the bilayer stays intact at 1400 K, and its electronic structure has a 0.72 eV HOMO-LUMO gap and strong interlayer aromaticity. If correct, this adds a stable bilayer motif to the B80 energy landscape and complicates the interpretation of the experimental spectrum.

What carries the argument

The central object is the D3h B80 bilayer: two equivalent quasi-planar layers connected through three interlayer B-B bonds, containing pentagonal-pyramid B6 and hexagonal-pyramid B7 units. The argument's engine is the photoelectron spectrum comparison—simulated vertical detachment energies of the bilayer anion against the 193-nm experimental spectrum—which turns a calculated isomer into a candidate carrier of the observed signal. Supporting machinery includes vibrational frequency analysis, AIMD thermal stability tests, and NICS-based aromaticity evaluation.

What would settle it

A higher-resolution photoelectron spectrum of B80⁻ that resolves additional bands or vibrational structure: if bilayer simulations cannot reproduce the extra features while a cage or core-shell spectrum can, the bilayer assignment is ruled out. Alternatively, an ion-mobility cross-section measurement that mismatches the bilayer's shape would settle against it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a D3h-symmetric B80 bilayer is a viable alternative structural assignment for the experimentally observed B80⁻. Built from a C60 framework by substituting boron and capping pentagons and selected hexagons, the bilayer has an average interlayer bond length of 1.715 Å, resembling bilayer borophene. Its simulated photoelectron spectrum matches the measured bands at 3.2, 4.0, and 4.8 eV within 0.04 eV, and at the SCS-MP2 and DLPNO-CCSD(T) levels the bilayer is second only to the core-shell structure in stability, ahead of the buckyball and volleyball. Vibrational analysis confirms it is a local minimum, and AIMD simulations show it survives 8 ps at 1400 K, highe

Load-bearing premise

The spectral match is assumed to be structurally informative, but the experimental spectrum has only three broad bands and the buckyball isomer reproduces the same bands, so agreement with the bilayer does not uniquely distinguish the two assignments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the bilayer is the carrier, the B80⁻ spectrum is reassigned from a hollow cage to a stacked-layer motif, changing the structural interpretation of medium-size boron clusters.
  • The bilayer's thermal stability at 1400 K, higher than the hollow cages' collapse temperature, makes it a promising target for gas-phase synthesis and for building thicker boron nanosheets.
  • The strong interlayer aromaticity (NICS ≈ −44 ppm) suggests bilayer borophene-like motifs persist in finite clusters, potentially guiding nanoscale electronics design.
  • The energy ordering core-shell > bilayer > buckyball/volleyball at correlated levels sharpens the competition between icosahedral stuffed and layered packing in B80.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's own Figure 2 shows the B80⁻ buckyball also reproduces the same three experimental bands; since the spectrum contains only three broad bands, agreement with the bilayer is not unique evidence for it.
  • A higher-resolution photoelectron spectrum or anion photoelectron imaging that resolves additional bands or vibrational progressions could discriminate between the bilayer and cage assignments.
  • If confirmed, the bilayer would place B80 near a structural phase boundary between icosahedral core-shell and layered motifs, implying that charge state or temperature could tip the balance in neighboring cluster sizes.
  • The construction recipe from C60 suggests a family of related bilayer clusters at other sizes; testing whether three interlayer bonds is the optimal packing rule would be a natural next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a D3h-symmetric B80 bilayer structure, characterized at the DFT level with PBE0 and TPSSh, and reports relative energies against core-shell, buckyball, and volleyball isomers at several levels including SCS-MP2 and DLPNO-CCSD(T). AIMD simulations are used to claim thermodynamic stability up to 1400 K, and vibrational analysis is used to support kinetic stability. The electronic structure is analyzed via HOMO-LUMO gap, AdNDP bonding, and NICS aromaticity. The central experimental claim is that the simulated photoelectron spectrum of the B80- bilayer reproduces the X, A, and B bands of the 193-nm PES of B80- within 0.04 eV, and that this agreement supports the bilayer as a possible alternative assignment for the observed species.

Significance. If the computational results are correct, the paper adds a new bilayer motif to the B80 energy landscape and documents its thermodynamic, vibrational, and bonding characteristics with a multi-level computational protocol. The use of SCS-MP2 and DLPNO-CCSD(T) single points, the B40- PES benchmark, and the explicit comparison with previously proposed isomers are genuine strengths. However, the experimental-support claim is the weakest link: the simulated PES of the buckyball isomer reproduces the same broad experimental bands, so the PES comparison does not discriminate between the bilayer and previously proposed assignments. The significance therefore rests on the bilayer's intrinsic stability, not on photoelectron evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results and Discussion, Photoelectron spectroscopy (Figure 2)] The central claim that the simulated PES 'supports' the bilayer assignment is not secured by the data presented. Figure 2 shows that the buckyball also reproduces the major X, A, and B bands, and the only quantitative ADE/VDE comparison reported is for band X: bilayer 3.19/3.24 eV versus experimental 3.1/3.2 eV, while the buckyball gives 3.09/3.10 eV. No per-band VDE values or uncertainties are given for bands A and B, so the abstract's statement that principal features agree within 0.04 eV is an overstatement. To make the PES comparison informative, provide calculated VDEs and stick spectra for all three bands for both isomers and a defined comparison metric; otherwise the experimental spectrum is compatible with both assignments and cannot be used as evidence favoring the bilayer.
  2. [Results and Discussion, Structure and Stability (Table S1)] The claim that the bilayer is 'energetically competitive' with previously proposed structures is not supported by any numerical relative energies in the main text. The text refers to Table S1 and states a hierarchy at multiple levels of theory, but no quantitative values are given. Without the actual SCS-MP2 and DLPNO-CCSD(T) energy differences, the reader cannot judge how competitive the bilayer is, especially against the core-shell isomer. Include a main-text table with relative energies (in eV or kcal/mol) for all four isomers at all levels, including zero-point corrections if used.
  3. [Conclusions and Abstract] The phrases 'experimental support for existence' (title), 'support the potential existence' (abstract), and 'providing support for the potential existence' (Conclusions) overreach the evidence. The PES comparison is non-diagnostic because the buckyball reproduces the same bands, and the only quantitative match is for band X. The statements should be softened to say the simulated spectrum is 'compatible with' the experimental spectrum, unless a discriminating comparison is added. This is a load-bearing issue because it affects the paper's main claimed connection to experiment.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Results and Discussion, Raman spectrum] There is an internal inconsistency: the Raman frequency range is stated as 141.1 to 1327.0 cm^-1, but the highest vibrational frequency is later quoted as 1003.0 cm^-1. Please clarify which number is correct and whether 1327.0 cm^-1 is a Raman-active mode or a different computed frequency.
  2. [Methods / References] The experimental PES data of Choi et al. is cited as a ChemRxiv preprint (Ref. 42). Since the paper's experimental-support claim depends on these data, please note the preprint status explicitly and, if a peer-reviewed version has appeared, cite and compare with it.
  3. [Results and Discussion, AIMD simulations] The inference of 'maintains structural integrity up to 1400 K' is based on 8 ps NVT trajectories at a few temperatures. This is a standard but limited metric; I suggest adding a caveat that longer timescales or free-energy barriers would be needed for a rigorous thermodynamic-stability statement, and that the current wording is an operational criterion.
  4. [Structure construction] The paper describes a targeted construction based on a C60 isomer with insertion at 12 pentagon centers and 8 selected hexagon centers. This is a reasonable design strategy, but it does not constitute a global search over bilayer or core-shell isomers. Terms such as 'energy landscape' in the introduction and conclusions should be framed as restricted to the compared isomers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the computed VDEs are first-principles predictions benchmarked against B40-, and the experimental PES is used only as an external comparison target, not as a fitted input.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (1) construct and optimize a D3h B80 bilayer at PBE0/TPSSh; (2) confirm it is a local minimum by vibrational analysis; (3) assess thermodynamic stability by AIMD; (4) compute relative energies against core-shell, buckyball, and volleyball isomers at several levels; (5) simulate the anion photoelectron spectrum from the optimized anionic geometry; and (6) compare with the experimental B80- spectrum of Choi et al. None of these steps feeds the experimental B80- peak positions into the electronic-structure calculation, nor are any VDE values fitted to reproduce the observed bands. The simulated PES is determined by the optimized geometry and electronic structure, and the experimental spectrum is introduced only after calculation as a comparison target. The Gaussian broadening width (0.15 eV) is a standard visualization choice, not a fitted spectral parameter. The benchmark against the well-characterized B40- anion (Figure S11) provides an external check of the PES protocol. The only self-citation (Ref. 22, the authors' prior B92 core-shell paper) appears in the introduction as contextual background and is not load-bearing: it does not justify the bilayer structure, exclude alternatives, or provide a uniqueness theorem. A real caveat is that the paper itself states 'Both B80- buckyball and B80- bilayer structures well reproduced the major experimental spectral features (X, A and B)', so the PES agreement is not shown to discriminate between the bilayer and the buckyball assignment; this weakens the 'experimental support' inference but is a scientific-evidence concern, not a circularity. No equation, fitted parameter, or self-citation chain reduces the claimed result to its own inputs. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

One new structural entity, no new forces or particles. Two hand-set choices (spectral broadening and hexagon-center decoration count) affect presentation/topology, and several standard domain assumptions carry the stability and spectral claims.

free parameters (2)
  • Gaussian broadening FWHM in simulated PES = 0.15 eV
    Chosen to produce smooth spectra for visual comparison with experimental bands; affects apparent agreement but not the underlying VDE peak positions.
  • Number and placement of hexagon-center boron atoms in the construction = 8 of 20 hexagonal rings in a D3h pattern
    The bilayer is built by adding B atoms to 8 selected hexagons of a B60 framework; the specific selection determines the final topology and was chosen by hand to reach the D3h bilayer.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption DFT (PBE0, TPSSh with D3-BJ) and single-point SCS-MP2/DLPNO-CCSD(T) provide accurate relative energies for B80 isomers.
    Used throughout to rank stability; no independent confirmation for B80 specifically.
  • domain assumption PBE0-computed vertical and adiabatic detachment energies are accurate to a few hundredths of an eV for boron cluster anions.
    Justified by a benchmark against B40- in Figure S11; still an assumption when transferred to B80-.
  • domain assumption The experimental PES bands X, A, and B and their ADE/VDE values from Choi et al. are correctly assigned.
    All comparison rests on this unverified experimental assignment; the cited paper is a preprint.
  • ad hoc to paper 8 ps NVT AIMD at a given temperature is sufficient to infer 'maintains structural integrity up to 1400 K'.
    The threshold is based on a single short trajectory; no convergence or multiple-seed analysis is reported.
  • domain assumption NICS and AdNDP are valid descriptors of aromaticity and bonding for this cluster.
    Standard tools, but NICS signs can be basis- and position-dependent and AdNDP occupation numbers include some arbitrariness.
invented entities (1)
  • D3h-symmetric B80 bilayer isomer
    purpose: Proposed alternative structural assignment for the experimentally observed B80- species and a new stable motif in the B80 energy landscape.
    The structure is new and its only experimental support is a simulated PES that the buckyball isomer also reproduces; no unique, falsifiable observable is predicted.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Signatures of a bilayer structure in the photoelectron spectrum of B$_{80}^-$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3DQICBVX

@misc{pith2026251113172,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Signatures of a bilayer structure in the photoelectron spectrum of B$_80^-$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3DQICBVX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.13172}
}
abstract

Recent photoelectron spectroscopy of B$_{80}^-$ was interpreted in terms of a fullerene-like cage structure. During our systematic investigation of medium-sized boron clusters, we identified a $D_{3h}$-symmetric bilayer isomer whose simulated photoelectron spectrum reproduces the principal features of the experimental photoelectron spectrum within 0.04 eV. The bilayer is energetically competitive with previously proposed structures and remains dynamically stable up to 1400 K according to ab initio molecular dynamics and vibrational analyses. Its electronic structure exhibits a 0.72 eV HOMO-LUMO gap and strong interlayer aromaticity, reflected by a NICS(0) value of $-44.3$ ppm in the interlayer B-B bonding region. These findings reveal a stable bilayer motif in the B$_{80}$ energy landscape and support its viability as a possible alternative structural assignment for the experimentally observed B$_{80}^-$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.13172 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top view (a), front view (b) and side view (c) of B80 bilayer. The Raman spectra of B80 bilayer structure were performed, as shown in Figures S3. The results showed that the frequency of B80 bilayer ranged from 141.1 cm-1 to 1327.0 cm-1 . No imaginary frequencies were obtained, confirming that the B80 bilayer structure was the local minima. Furthermore, the highest vibrational frequency of B80 bilayer was 1003.0 cm-… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Experimental photoelectron spectrum of B80⁻ recorded at 193 nm (6.424 eV), adapted from Ref. 42. (b) Simulated photoelectron spectrum of the B80⁻ buckyball at the PBE0 level. (c) Simulated photoelectron spectrum of the B80⁻ bilayer at the PBE0 level. Photoelectron spectroscopy, as powerful tools for probing gas-phase cluster structures, was employed to elucidate the structural and electronic properties of B80- b… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. AdNDP for B80 bilayer, with the occupation numbers (ONs) indicated. To investigate the aromaticity of the B80 bilayer, we calculated the NICS-scanned curves in two different directions, as shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: NICS-scanned curves on the y-axis (a) and the z-axis (b) of B80 bilayer, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In summary, the B80 bilayer has been performed using the first principles calculation. The computational results suggested that the average interlayer bond length of B80 …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Sergeeva, A. P. and Popov, I. A. and Piazza, Z. A. and Li, W. L. and Romanescu, C. and Wang, L. S. and Boldyrev, A. I. , title =. Accounts of Chemical Research , volume =

  2. [2]

    Wang, L. S. , title =. International Reviews in Physical Chemistry , volume =

  3. [3]

    and Chen, X

    Jian, T. and Chen, X. N. and Li, S. D. and Boldyrev, A. I. and Li, J. and Wang, L. S. , title =. Chemical Society Reviews , volume =

  4. [4]

    and Pan, S

    Barroso, J. and Pan, S. and Merino, G. , title =. Chemical Society Reviews , volume =

  5. [5]

    and He, K

    Chen, B. and He, K. H. and Dai, W. and Gutsev, G. L. and Lu, C. , title =. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , volume =

  6. [6]

    Szwacki, N. G. and Sadrzadeh, A. and Yakobson, B. I. , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  7. [7]

    and Beigi, S

    Tang, H. and Beigi, S. I. , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  8. [8]

    Yang, X. B. and Ding, Y. and Ni, J. , title =. Physical Review B , volume =

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Singh, A. K. and Sadrzadeh, A. and Yakobson, B. I. , title =. Nano Letters , volume =

  2. [10]

    and Yang, X

    Ding, Y. and Yang, X. B. and Ni, J. , title =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =

  3. [11]

    Wang, J. T. and Chen, C. F. and Wang, E. G. and Wang, D. S. and Mizuseki, H. and Kawazoe, Y. , title =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =

  4. [12]

    and Hao, C

    Jin, P. and Hao, C. and Gao, Z. X. and Zhang, S. B. and Chen, Z. F. , title =. Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume =

  5. [13]

    and Yang, L

    Liu, C. and Yang, L. and Jin, P. and Hou, Q. H. and Li, L. L. , title =. Chemical Physics Letters , volume =

  6. [14]

    and Ershadifar, M

    Mahdavifar, Z. and Ershadifar, M. and Farrokhnia, A. , title =. Journal of Electronic Materials , volume =

  7. [15]

    Li, J. L. and Yang, G. W. , title =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =

  8. [16]

    and Liu, C

    Jin, P. and Liu, C. and Hou, Q. H. and Li, L. L. and Tang, C. C. and Chen, Z. F. , title =. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume =

  9. [17]

    Li, Y. C. and Zhou, G. and Li, J. and Gu, B. L. and Duan, W. H. , title =. Journal of Physical Chemistry C , volume =

  10. [18]

    Li, J. L. and Hu, Z. S. and Yang, G. W. , title =. Chemical Physics , volume =

  11. [19]

    Li, F. Y. and Jiang, D. E. and Chen, Z. F. , title =. Journal of Molecular Modeling , volume =

  12. [20]

    Zhao, J. J. and Wang, L. and Li, F. Y. and Chen, Z. F. , title =. Journal of Physical Chemistry A , volume =

  13. [21]

    and Shao, N

    Li, H. and Shao, N. and Shang, B. and Yuan, L. F. and Yang, J. L. and Zeng, X. C. , title =. Chemical Communications , volume =

  14. [22]

    Chen, Y. S. and Guo, J. J. and Liu, P. B. and Zhao, H. Y. and Wang, J. and Liu, Y. , title =. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume =

  15. [23]

    Sai, L. W. and Wu, X. and Li, F. Y. , title =. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics , volume =

  16. [24]

    Prasad, D. L. V. K. and Jemmis, E. D. , title =. Physical Review Letters , volume =

  17. [25]

    and Lu, H

    Zhang, M. and Lu, H. G. and Li, S. D. , title =. Nano Research , volume =

  18. [26]

    Zhai, H. J. and Zhao, Y. F. and Li, W. L. and Chen, Q. and Bai, H. and Hu, H. S. and Piazza, Z. A. and Tian, W. J. and Lu, H. G. and Wu, Y. B. and Mu, Y. W. and Wei, G. F. and Liu, Z. P. and Li, J. and Li, S. D. and Wang, L. S. , title =. Nature Chemistry , volume =

  19. [27]

    Sergeeva, A. P. and Zubarev, D. Y. and Zhai, H. J. and Boldyrev, A. I. and Wang, L. S. , title =. Journal of the American Chemical Society , volume =

  20. [28]

    Zhai, H. J. and Alexandrova, A. N. and Birch, K. A. and Boldyrev, A. I. and Wang, L. S. , title =. Angewandte Chemie International Edition , volume =

  21. [29]

    and Sergeeva, A

    Huang, W. and Sergeeva, A. P. and Zhai, H. J. and Averkiev, B. B. and Wang, L. S. and Boldyrev, A. I. , title =. Nature Chemistry , volume =

  22. [30]

    and Chen, T

    Chen, Q. and Chen, T. T. and Li, H. R. and Zhao, X. Y. and Chen, W. J. and Zhai, H. J. and Li, S. D. and Wang, L. S. , title =. Nanoscale , volume =

  23. [31]

    and Chen, T

    Bai, H. and Chen, T. T. and Chen, Q. and Zhao, X. Y. and Zhang, Y. Y. and Chen, W. J. and Li, W. L. and Cheung, L. F. and Bai, B. and Cavanagh, J. and Huang, W. and Li, S. D. and Li, J. and Wang, L. S. , title =. Nanoscale , volume =

  24. [32]

    and Li, W

    Chen, Q. and Li, W. L. and Zhao, Y. F. and Zhang, S. Y. and Hu, H. S. and Bai, H. and Li, H. R. and Tian, W. J. and Lu, H. G. and Zhai, H. J. and Li, S. D. and Li, J. and Wang, L. S. , title =. ACS Nano , volume =

  25. [33]

    Piazza, Z. A. and Hu, H. S. and Li, W. L. and Zhao, Y. F. and Li, J. and Wang, L. S. , title =. Nature Communications , volume =

  26. [34]

    Mannix, A. J. and Zhou, X. F. and Kiraly, B. and Wood, J. D. and Alducin, D. and Myers, B. D. and Liu, X. and Fisher, B. L. and Santiago, U. and Guest, J. R. and Yacaman, M. J. and Ponce, A. and Oganov, A. R. and Hersam, M. C. and Guisinger, N. P. , title =. Science , volume =

  27. [35]

    Feng, B. J. and Zhang, J. and Zhong, Q. and Li, W. B. and Li, S. and Li, H. and Cheng, P. P. and Meng, S. and Chen, L. and Wu, K. H. , title =. Nature Chemistry , volume =

  28. [36]

    Sai, L. W. and Wu, X. and Gao, N. and Zhao, J. J. and King, R. B. , title =. Nanoscale , volume =

  29. [37]

    Chen, W. J. and Ma, Y. Y. and Chen, T. T. and Ao, M. Z. and Yuan, D. F. and Chen, Q. and Tian, X. X. and Mu, Y. W. and Li, S. D. and Wang, L. S. , title =. Nanoscale , volume =

  30. [38]

    and Xuan, X

    Xu, Y. and Xuan, X. Y. and Yang, T. F. and Zhang, Z. H. and Li, S. D. and Guo, W. L. , title =. Nano Letters , volume =

  31. [39]

    Ma, Y. Y. and Zhao, X. Y. and Zan, W. Y. and Mu, Y. W. and Zhang, Z. H. and Li, S. D. , title =. Nano Research , volume =

  32. [40]

    and Liao, R

    Wu, X. and Liao, R. and Liang, X. Q. and Sai, L. W. and Liu, Y. and Yang, G. C. and Zhao, J. J. , title =. Nanoscale , volume =

  33. [41]

    Chen, J. H. and Liao, R. and Sai, L. W. and Zhao, J. J. and Wu, X. , title =. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , volume =

  34. [42]

    Wang, X. Q. , title =. Physical Review B , volume =

  35. [43]

    Choi, H. W. and Zhang, Y. Y. and Kahraman, D. and Xu, C. Q. and Gao, H. W. and Li, J. and Wang, L. S. , title =. Chemical Science , year =

  36. [44]

    Liu, X. L. and Li, Q. C. and Ruan, Q. Y. and Rahn, M. S. and Yakobson, B. I. and Hersam, M. C. , title =. Nature Materials , volume =

  37. [45]

    , title =

    Boustani, I. , title =. Physical Review B , volume =

  38. [46]

    and Boustani, I

    Quandt, A. and Boustani, I. , title =. ChemPhysChem , volume =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.