Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

FeRA: Frequency-Energy Constrained Routing for Effective Diffusion Adaptation Fine-Tuning

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read FeRA claims that diffusion fine-tuning works best when adapter updates follow the denoising trajectory's frequency–energy progression.

desk verdict A useful PEFT recipe whose empirical claims need cleaning up; the frequency-energy mechanism as stated is contradicted by the noisy latent it routes on. read the letter →

arxiv 2511.17979 v2 pith:32S7QC64 submitted 2025-11-22 cs.CV

Bo Yin , Xiaobin Hu , Xingyu Zhou , Yu He , Peng-Tao Jiang , Yue Liao , Junwei Zhu , Jiangning Zhang
show 2 more authors
Ying Tai Shuicheng Yan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords parameter-efficientfine-tuningdiffusionmodelsfrequency-energyindicatorsoftroutingmixtureofexpertsLoRADreamBoothfrequencyconsistencyloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that parameter-efficient fine-tuning of diffusion models is improved when the adapter's updates follow the denoising process's natural frequency–energy progression: early steps handle low-frequency structure, later steps add high-frequency detail. To exploit this, FeRA computes a compact Frequency-Energy Indicator (FEI) from the latent via Difference-of-Gaussians band filters, uses a soft router to blend several LoRA experts according to that indicator at both training and inference, and adds a Frequency-Energy Consistency Loss that keeps adapter corrections aligned with the residual's bandwise energy. Across five style datasets and DreamBooth customization, with budgets of 5M, 20M, and 50M parameters and backbones from SD 1.5 to FLUX.1, FeRA reports consistently lower FID and higher or competitive CLIP/Style scores than LoRA, DoRA, AdaLoRA, and SaRA, and in many settings matches or beats full fine-tuning. If the claim holds, diffusion adaptation should be energy-aware and timestep-continuous, not uniform or hard-gated by step index.

What carries the argument

The Frequency-Energy Indicator (FEI): a normalized vector of per-band energies of the latent, obtained with Difference-of-Gaussians band-pass filters; it feeds a two-layer soft router (with temperature softmax) that blends several LoRA experts, and its band weights also derive the Frequency-Energy Consistency Loss (FECL) that matches the adapter correction's bandwise energy to the residual's. The FEI is the load-bearing object because it replaces discrete timestep indices with a continuous, physically motivated routing signal that operates identically at training and inference.

What would settle it

Compute bandwise energies of decoded latents (pixel space) and compare them to the latent FEI across timesteps; if they diverge at high noise levels or on out-of-distribution latents, the router's input no longer represents the claimed physical quantity. Alternatively, replace the FEI with a fixed random vector (or a permutation of itself) under identical training; if the FID gains persist, spectral content is not the causal driver.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

FeRA's central claim is that the latent representation's bandwise frequency energy—not the discrete timestep index—is the right routing key for diffusion fine-tuning. The paper establishes that diffusion denoising proceeds by a consistent coarse-to-fine shift of energy from low to high frequencies, and that a fine-tuning framework which routes adapter experts and regularizes updates according to this shift (via the Frequency-Energy Indicator, soft router, and Frequency-Energy Consistency Loss) aligns parameter updates with the intrinsic frequency–energy progression of denoising. This alignment yields stable, transferable improvements in generation quality and generalization across diffusion

Load-bearing premise

The latent-space Frequency-Energy Indicator faithfully mirrors the image-domain frequency-energy progression: the VAE encoder is assumed locally approximately linear with a frequency response that preserves natural-image spectral structure, so per-frequency SNR in latent space matches pixel space.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • FeRA-style energy-aware routing should generalize across diffusion U-Net and DiT backbones and across resolutions, since the frequency–energy progression is a property of the denoising process rather than of a specific architecture.
  • Parameter budgets as small as 5M can match or beat full fine-tuning on style and identity tasks when updates are concentrated on the active frequency bands, making diffusion adaptation substantially cheaper.
  • The frequency-energy consistency loss stabilizes optimization, so increasing the trainable budget translates into better fidelity rather than overfitting.
  • Because routing is continuous and dynamically determined at inference time by the latent's frequency energy, the same trained module adapts to different noise schedules without retraining the router.
  • The framework integrates with existing adapter-based tuning schemes, so its gains can be layered onto LoRA, DoRA, or other low-rank methods without architectural changes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer the frequency-energy routing principle could transfer to other iterative generative processes—flow matching, consistency models, or video diffusion—where coarse-to-fine spectral structure also emerges; replacing timestep gating with an FEI-style indicator is a straightforward test.
  • We infer the method's success depends on the VAE's spectral preservation; a diagnostic comparing latent FEI to pixel-space energies on out-of-distribution latents or at high noise levels could reveal where routing degrades.
  • We infer the gain may come more from energy-weighted update concentration than from multi-expert blending; ablating FeRA against a single adapter with energy-scaled scaling would isolate the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes FeRA, a parameter-efficient fine-tuning framework for diffusion models. FeRA consists of three components: a Frequency-Energy Indicator (FEI) that summarizes the latent's bandwise energy distribution via Difference-of-Gaussians filters, a soft frequency router that blends multiple LoRA experts based on the FEI, and a Frequency-Energy Consistency Loss (FECL) that regularizes the bandwise alignment between adapter corrections and reconstruction residuals. The authors claim that FeRA consistently improves FID, CLIP, and Style scores over LoRA, DoRA, AdaLoRA, and SaRA across SD 1.5/2.0/3.0, SDXL, and FLUX.1, at 5M/20M/50M parameter budgets, for both style adaptation and DreamBooth image customization. Ablations on expert count, band count, FECL weight, and routing configuration are also reported. The theoretical motivation is that diffusion denoising follows a frequency-energy progression, with low frequencies recovered first and high frequencies later, and FeRA aligns adaptation with this progression.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, FeRA is a lightweight and generally applicable PEFT method that improves generation quality while adding modest inference overhead (~4–20% per step). The paper's strengths are its broad backbone coverage (five diffusion architectures, three parameter budgets), the inclusion of an MLLM-based style score with a transparent prompt, and ablations over the main design choices. The inference-time routing mechanism, driven by a continuous latent descriptor rather than a discrete timestep index, is an interesting and potentially useful idea. However, the current manuscript contains a sign inconsistency in the central SNR derivation, an unexplained duplication of numerical tables between the main paper and the appendix, and an unvalidated latent-space spectral-preservation assumption. These issues directly affect the soundness of the theoretical motivation and the credibility of the empirical generalization claims, so the paper cannot be accepted in its present form.

major comments (5)
  1. [§3, Eq. (2)] Equation (2) as printed states SNR_t(f) ∝ α_t/(1−α_t) · f^γ. Given the immediately preceding statement that natural images satisfy |x̂0(f)|² ∝ 1/f^γ with γ≈2, the SNR should be proportional to f^{-γ}, not f^{+γ}. The text below Eq. (2) ("higher f lead to rapidly diminishing SNR") is consistent with f^{-γ}, so this is likely a sign typo rather than a conceptual error, but the printed equation is internally inconsistent with the derivation. Please correct Eq. (2) and re-derive the subsequent discussion with the correct sign.
  2. [Table 2 vs. Appendix Table 6] Table 2 (main text, image customization on SD 2.0) and Table 6 (appendix, claimed to be SD 1.5) contain exactly the same numerical values for every method, every subject, and both CLIP-I and CLIP-T. This is not a plausible coincidence and undermines the claim in §9.2 that FeRA's DreamBooth improvements transfer across backbones. Similarly, Table 7 (SD 3.0) appears to be only a small uniform shift of the same numbers. Please rerun the experiments, correct the tables, and report genuine per-backbone results. Until this is resolved, the cross-backbone generalization claim for image customization is unsupported.
  3. [§3, §4.1, Eq. (5)] The paper claims that denoising proceeds with a "shift of energy dominance from low to high frequencies" and that "diffusion reconstruction progressively shifts energy from low to high frequencies." However, the FEI e_t is computed on the noisy latent z_t = √α_t x0 + √(1−α_t)ε (Eq. (1)). At high t (α_t ≈ 0), z_t is noise-dominated and its normalized band energies are nearly flat; as t decreases, z_t approaches x0, whose spectrum is low-frequency dominated. Thus the empirically measured e_t would move from flat/high-frequency-like toward low-frequency-dominant, i.e., high-to-low, not low-to-high. If the intended quantity is "recoverable signal energy" weighted by per-frequency SNR, that quantity is never defined or computed. This is load-bearing because the router (Eq. (6)) and FECL (Eq. (10)) both consume e_t. Please provide a direct measurement of e_t over t in latent space and clarify
  4. [§3 latent-space proxy] The transition from pixel-space analysis to latent-space FEI rests on the assertion that the VAE encoder is "locally approximately linear" and that its frequency response "approximately preserves the spectral structure of natural images." The cited references [3, 21, 36] do not demonstrate these properties for the specific latent diffusion VAE. Since the FEI, router, and FECL all operate on latent features, this assumption is central. Please provide empirical validation: compute per-band energies in both pixel space and latent space across timesteps and backbones, and show that the latent FEI tracks the pixel-space progression. If the latent spectral structure diverges (e.g., at high-noise steps), the routing signal may not correspond to the physical quantity the method's motivation depends on.
  5. [Table 5 (SD 1.5, 5M)] The abstract and introduction claim "consistent improvements in generation quality." Table 5 shows that at 5M on SD 1.5, FeRA has lower CLIP scores than all baselines on Barbie (34.34 vs. 35.19 for LoRA), Cyberpunk (32.96 vs. 33.16), and Elementfire (31.12 vs. 31.59), while FID improves. Similar CLIP trade-offs appear in Table 1 for some SD 3.0/FLUX.1 settings (e.g., SD 3.0 Elementfire 5M: FeRA CLIP 31.79 vs. LoRA 32.19). The claim of "consistent" improvements should be nuanced to acknowledge metric trade-offs, especially at low budgets, or the authors should discuss why CLIP degradation is acceptable. This is not a reason to reject, but it is necessary for accurate presentation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] Typos: "foud" (Sec. 5.1), "Merage" (Fig. 2), "Frequency-Enengy" (Sec. 5.4 heading), "a expert MoE design" (Sec. 5.4), "Strengths of FECL" (Fig. 6 caption).
  2. [Sec. 9.3, Table 8] The sentence "add only a modest overhead of 8–20The results" is incomplete; a unit (presumably %) is missing. Also, Table 8 gives only theoretical ranges without specifying the measurement procedure or hardware; please clarify how these numbers were obtained.
  3. [References] Reference [1] (Arora et al., "Low-frequency adaptation...") seems unrelated to the frequency-SNR derivation in §3. Reference [3] (Bengio et al., representation learning) is cited to support VAE local linearity, which it does not establish. Please verify and replace with appropriate citations.
  4. [Sec. 5.1] The sentence "More backbones can be foud in Appendix. Results on additional backbones following the same protocol are provided in the Appendix" is redundant. Also, the claim "We compare parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods on Stable Diffusion 2.0, 3.0 and FLUX.1" should mention that SD 1.5 and SDXL results appear in the appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: FeRA's components are defined from external SNR/natural-image facts, and its gains are measured on external benchmarks; no prediction reduces to a fitted parameter or self-citation.

full rationale

FeRA's derivation chain starts from the forward diffusion SNR formula (Eqs. 1–2) and the natural-image power-law spectrum, both cited to external prior work (Ho et al. 2020; Field 1987; Ruderman & Bialek 1993). The FEI (Eqs. 3–5) is an explicit operational definition of bandwise energy, not a fitted quantity; the router (Eqs. 6–7) is a trainable MLP consuming this indicator; and FECL (Eqs. 8–10) is a regularizer on correction/residual band energies. None of these equations embeds the evaluation targets (FID, CLIP, Style Score), and the reported improvements are measured on held-out style and DreamBooth datasets against LoRA/DoRA/AdaLoRA/SaRA and full fine-tuning. The hyperparameters (n=3 bands, M=3 experts, τ=0.7, λ_f) are selected via ablations in Sec. 5.3, which is standard model selection rather than a prediction forced by construction. The only self-citations (SaRA [16]; Yin et al. [54]) are used as a baseline and related work, and neither is load-bearing for the claimed frequency-energy mechanism. The paper's latent-space proxy assumption—that the VAE approximately preserves spectral structure so latent FEI mirrors pixel-space frequency-energy—is asserted with external citations and is an unverified empirical assumption; additionally, the paper's 'low-to-high' energy-dominance wording appears in tension with its own Eq. (2), which would predict high-to-low normalized energy dominance over denoising. These are correctness/support concerns, not circularity: nothing in the derivation reduces to its own output, to a fitted target, or to a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The method rests on standard natural-image statistics and a locality assumption for the VAE, plus several design hyperparameters selected by ablation on one dataset. Eq. (2) contains a sign inconsistency that needs correction.

free parameters (4)
  • n (number of frequency bands) = 3
    Selected by ablation on the Cyberpunk dataset (Fig. 6b): 3 bands outperform 2, 4, and 5.
  • M (number of LoRA experts) = 3
    Selected by ablation on the Cyberpunk dataset (Fig. 6a): 3 experts perform best.
  • τ (router temperature) = 0.7
    Fixed in Sec. 4.2; no ablation is shown for this value.
  • λ_f (FECL weight) = not explicitly stated; ablated over {0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3}
    Sec. 5.3 says small weights stabilize training and larger weights oscillate, but the final choice is not reported.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Natural images approximately follow a power-law spectrum |x0(f)|² ∝ 1/f^γ with γ≈2.
    Used in Sec. 3 to derive the frequency-dependent SNR that motivates the coarse-to-fine progression.
  • domain assumption The VAE encoder is locally approximately linear and approximately preserves image spectral structure, so latent SNR ≈ image SNR.
    Bridges the pixel-domain frequency-energy analysis to the latent-space FEI; stated in Sec. 3 with citations [3,21,36].
  • domain assumption The noise spectrum E[|ε̂(f)|²] is nearly constant across frequency.
    Assumed in Eq. (2) so that the frequency dependence of SNR comes from the signal term.
  • domain assumption DoG filters with dyadic Gaussian scales produce minimal overlap and cover the full frequency spectrum, so Σ_k E_k ≈ ||z_t||².
    Justifies the FEI normalization in Eq. (5); the paper asserts this rather than proving it for finite-resolution latents.
  • domain assumption Ground-truth latents z_t are available for the FECL loss during training.
    FECL requires z_t, z_base, and z_lora; this is true only during training, not at inference, which the paper acknowledges by applying FECL in training only.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of FeRA: Frequency-Energy Constrained Routing for Effective Diffusion Adaptation Fine-Tuning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/32S7QC64

@misc{pith2026251117979,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: FeRA: Frequency-Energy Constrained Routing for Effective Diffusion Adaptation Fine-Tuning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/32S7QC64}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2511.17979}
}
read the original abstract

Diffusion models have achieved remarkable success in generative modeling, yet how to effectively adapt large pretrained models to new tasks remains challenging. We revisit the reconstruction behavior of diffusion models during denoising to unveil the underlying frequency energy mechanism governing this process. Building upon this observation, we propose FeRA, a frequency driven fine tuning framework that aligns parameter updates with the intrinsic frequency energy progression of diffusion. FeRA establishes a comprehensive frequency energy framework for effective diffusion adaptation fine tuning, comprising three synergistic components: (i) a compact frequency energy indicator that characterizes the latent bandwise energy distribution, (ii) a soft frequency router that adaptively fuses multiple frequency specific adapter experts, and (iii) a frequency energy consistency regularization that stabilizes diffusion optimization and ensures coherent adaptation across bands. Routing operates in both training and inference, with inference time routing dynamically determined by the latent frequency energy. It integrates seamlessly with adapter based tuning schemes and generalizes well across diffusion backbones and resolutions. By aligning adaptation with the frequency energy mechanism, FeRA provides a simple, stable, and compatible paradigm for effective and robust diffusion model adaptation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.17979 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Frequency-energy evolution during denoising. (a) Vi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The classical parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the FeRA framework. The Frequency-Energy Indicator (FEI) extracted by DoG operators guides a Soft Fre￾quency Router to adaptively blend multiple LoRA experts. A Frequency-Energy Consistency Loss (FECL) further regularizes the spectral alignment between correction and residual during fine-tuning. 3, and why we set this number will be discussed in Sec￾tion 5.3. We compare our approach with four state-of￾th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the generated images between different PEFT methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: DreamBooth results across PEFT methods. FeRA delivers more consistent identity and cleaner compositions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ablation on design factors of FeRA: (a) LoRA expert number, (b) frequency decomposition, and (c) the strengths of FECL. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Compared with discrete routing strategy. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the generated images between different PEFT methods in other datasets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the generated images between different PEFT methods(SD1.5). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the generated images between different PEFT methods(SD3.0). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of the image customization between different PEFT methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. IRPO: Boosting Image Restoration via Post-training GRPO

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GRPO post-training on the worst 30% of samples with a mixed fidelity/perceptual reward improves AdaIR by 0.83 dB in-domain and 3.43 dB on out-of-domain benchmarks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 21 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Jatin Kumar Arora, Sudhar Rajagopalan, Jaskaran Singh, and Ashish Purohit. Low-frequency adaptation-deep neural network-based domain adaptation approach for shaft imbal- ance fault diagnosis.Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 12(1):375–394, 2024. 3

    2024

  2. [2]

    Qwen technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023

    Jinze Bai, Shuai Bai, Yunfei Chu, Zeyu Cui, Kai Dang, Xiaodong Deng, Yang Fan, Wenbin Ge, Yu Han, Fei Huang, et al. Qwen technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16609, 2023. 5

    arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    Rep- resentation learning: A review and new perspectives.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 35(8):1798–1828, 2013

    Yoshua Bengio, Aaron Courville, and Pascal Vincent. Rep- resentation learning: A review and new perspectives.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 35(8):1798–1828, 2013. 3

    2013

  4. [4]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023

    Andreas Blattmann, Tim Dockhorn, Sumith Kulal, Daniel Mendelevitch, Maciej Kilian, Dominik Lorenz, Yam Levi, Zion English, Vikram V oleti, Adam Letts, et al. Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023. 2

    arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Task-adaptive parameter-efficient fine-tuning for weather foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22020, 2025

    Shilei Cao, Hehai Lin, Jiashun Cheng, Yang Liu, Guowen Li, Xuehe Wang, Juepeng Zheng, Haoyuan Liang, Meng Jin, Chengwei Qin, et al. Task-adaptive parameter-efficient fine-tuning for weather foundation models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22020, 2025. 2

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Find: Fine- tuning initial noise distribution with policy optimization for diffusion models

    Changgu Chen, Libing Yang, Xiaoyan Yang, Lianggangxu Chen, Gaoqi He, Changbo Wang, and Yang Li. Find: Fine- tuning initial noise distribution with policy optimization for diffusion models. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM Interna- tional Conference on Multimedia, pages 6735–6744, 2024. 2

    2024

  7. [7]

    Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with sim- ple and efficient sparsity.Journal of Machine Learning Re- search, 23(120):1–39, 2022

    William Fedus, Barret Zoph, and Noam Shazeer. Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with sim- ple and efficient sparsity.Journal of Machine Learning Re- search, 23(120):1–39, 2022. 3

    2022

  8. [8]

    Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4(12):2379–2394, 1987

    David J Field. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells.Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4(12):2379–2394, 1987. 3

    1987

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to- image generation using textual inversion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01618, 2022

    Rinon Gal, Yuval Alaluf, Yuval Atzmon, Or Patash- nik, Amit H Bermano, Gal Chechik, and Daniel Cohen- Or. An image is worth one word: Personalizing text-to- image generation using textual inversion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01618, 2022. 1, 2

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Mixture of efficient diffusion ex- perts through automatic interval and sub-network selection

    Alireza Ganjdanesh, Yan Kang, Yuchen Liu, Richard Zhang, Zhe Lin, and Heng Huang. Mixture of efficient diffusion ex- perts through automatic interval and sub-network selection. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 54–71. Springer, 2024. 3

    2024

  3. [11]

    Parameter- efficient transfer learning with diff pruning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.07463, 2020

    Demi Guo, Alexander M Rush, and Yoon Kim. Parameter- efficient transfer learning with diff pruning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.07463, 2020. 2

    2012 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Animatediff: Animate your personalized text- to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725, 2023

    Yuwei Guo, Ceyuan Yang, Anyi Rao, Zhengyang Liang, Yaohui Wang, Yu Qiao, Maneesh Agrawala, Dahua Lin, and Bo Dai. Animatediff: Animate your personalized text- to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725, 2023. 2

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 1, 2, 3

    2020

  6. [14]

    Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp

    Neil Houlsby, Andrei Giurgiu, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Bruna Morrone, Quentin De Laroussilhe, Andrea Gesmundo, Mona Attariyan, and Sylvain Gelly. Parameter-efficient transfer learning for nlp. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 2790–2799. PMLR, 2019. 1

    2019

  7. [15]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.ICLR, 1(2):3, 2022

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen- Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, Weizhu Chen, et al. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.ICLR, 1(2):3, 2022. 1, 2, 5

    2022

  8. [16]

    High-efficient diffusion model fine-tuning with progressive sparse low-rank adaptation

    Teng Hu, Jiangning Zhang, Ran Yi, Hongrui Huang, Yabiao Wang, and Lizhuang Ma. High-efficient diffusion model fine-tuning with progressive sparse low-rank adaptation. In 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, pages 92066–92078. International Conf...

    2025

  9. [17]

    Face super-resolution guided by 3d facial priors

    Xiaobin Hu, Wenqi Ren, John LaMaster, Xiaochun Cao, Xi- aoming Li, Zechao Li, Bjoern Menze, and Wei Liu. Face super-resolution guided by 3d facial priors. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 763–780. Springer,

  10. [18]

    Realtalk: Real-time and realistic audio- driven face generation with 3d facial prior-guided identity alignment network.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18284, 2024

    Xiaozhong Ji, Chuming Lin, Zhonggan Ding, Ying Tai, Junwei Zhu, Xiaobin Hu, Donghao Luo, Yanhao Ge, and Chengjie Wang. Realtalk: Real-time and realistic audio- driven face generation with 3d facial prior-guided identity alignment network.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.18284, 2024. 1

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Sonic: Shifting focus to global au- dio perception in portrait animation

    Xiaozhong Ji, Xiaobin Hu, Zhihong Xu, Junwei Zhu, Chum- ing Lin, Qingdong He, Jiangning Zhang, Donghao Luo, Yi Chen, Qin Lin, et al. Sonic: Shifting focus to global au- dio perception in portrait animation. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conferenc...

    2025

  12. [20]

    Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:26565–26577, 2022

    Tero Karras, Miika Aittala, Timo Aila, and Samuli Laine. Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:26565–26577, 2022. 2

    2022

  13. [21]

    An introduction to variational autoencoders.Foundations and Trends® in Ma- chine Learning, 12(4):307–392, 2019

    Diederik P Kingma, Max Welling, et al. An introduction to variational autoencoders.Foundations and Trends® in Ma- chine Learning, 12(4):307–392, 2019. 3

    2019

  14. [22]

    Modern signals and systems.NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A, 91:11586,

    Huibert Kwakernaak and Raphael Sivan. Modern signals and systems.NASA STI/Recon Technical Report A, 91:11586,

  15. [23]

    Uni-lora: One vector is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00799, 2025

    Kaiyang Li, Shaobo Han, Qing Su, Wei Li, Zhipeng Cai, and Shihao Ji. Uni-lora: One vector is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.00799, 2025. 3 9

    2025

  16. [24]

    Zero- shot medical image translation via frequency-guided diffu- sion models.IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 43(3): 980–993, 2023

    Yunxiang Li, Hua-Chieh Shao, Xiao Liang, Liyuan Chen, Ruiqi Li, Steve Jiang, Jing Wang, and You Zhang. Zero- shot medical image translation via frequency-guided diffu- sion models.IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 43(3): 980–993, 2023. 2

    2023

  17. [25]

    Dora: Weight-decomposed low-rank adaptation

    Shih-Yang Liu, Chien-Yi Wang, Hongxu Yin, Pavlo Molchanov, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Kwang-Ting Cheng, and Min-Hung Chen. Dora: Weight-decomposed low-rank adaptation. InForty-first International Conference on Ma- chine Learning, 2024. 5

    2024

  18. [26]

    Routers in vision mixture of experts: An empir- ical study.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15969, 2024

    Tianlin Liu, Mathieu Blondel, Carlos Riquelme, and Joan Puigcerver. Routers in vision mixture of experts: An empir- ical study.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.15969, 2024. 3

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    P-tuning: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning across scales and tasks

    Xiao Liu, Kaixuan Ji, Yicheng Fu, Weng Tam, Zhengxiao Du, Zhilin Yang, and Jie Tang. P-tuning: Prompt tuning can be comparable to fine-tuning across scales and tasks. InPro- ceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short P...

    2022

  20. [28]

    Distinctive image features from scale- invariant keypoints.International journal of computer vi- sion, 60(2):91–110, 2004

    David G Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale- invariant keypoints.International journal of computer vi- sion, 60(2):91–110, 2004. 3

    2004

  21. [29]

    T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models

    Chong Mou, Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Yanze Wu, Jian Zhang, Zhongang Qi, and Ying Shan. T2i-adapter: Learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to-image diffusion models. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, pages 4296–4304, 202...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 8162–8171. PMLR,

  23. [31]

    Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988, 2022

    Ben Poole, Ajay Jain, Jonathan T Barron, and Ben Milden- hall. Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988, 2022. 1, 2

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Grad-tts: A diffusion prob- abilistic model for text-to-speech

    Vadim Popov, Ivan V ovk, Vladimir Gogoryan, Tasnima Sadekova, and Mikhail Kudinov. Grad-tts: A diffusion prob- abilistic model for text-to-speech. InInternational confer- ence on machine learning, pages 8599–8608. PMLR, 2021. 2

    2021

  25. [33]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervi- sion. InInternational conference on machine learning, p...

    2021

  26. [34]

    Hierarchical text-conditional image gener- ation with clip latents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125, 1 (2):3, 2022

    Aditya Ramesh, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol, Casey Chu, and Mark Chen. Hierarchical text-conditional image gener- ation with clip latents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125, 1 (2):3, 2022. 5

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Scaling vision with sparse mix- ture of experts.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:8583–8595, 2021

    Carlos Riquelme, Joan Puigcerver, Basil Mustafa, Maxim Neumann, Rodolphe Jenatton, Andr ´e Susano Pinto, Daniel Keysers, and Neil Houlsby. Scaling vision with sparse mix- ture of experts.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:8583–8595, 2021. 3

    2021

  28. [36]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 1, 2, 3

    2022

  29. [37]

    Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods.Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems, 6, 1993

    Daniel Ruderman and William Bialek. Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods.Advances in neural informa- tion processing systems, 6, 1993. 3

    1993

  30. [38]

    Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation

    Nataniel Ruiz, Yuanzhen Li, Varun Jampani, Yael Pritch, Michael Rubinstein, and Kfir Aberman. Dreambooth: Fine tuning text-to-image diffusion models for subject-driven generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 22500–...

    2023

  31. [39]

    Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00512, 2022

    Tim Salimans and Jonathan Ho. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00512, 2022. 1

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Noise estimation for generative diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.02600, 2021

    Robin San-Roman, Eliya Nachmani, and Lior Wolf. Noise estimation for generative diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.02600, 2021. 2

    2021 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Outra- geously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture- of-experts layer.arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06538, 2017

    Noam Shazeer, Azalia Mirhoseini, Krzysztof Maziarz, Andy Davis, Quoc Le, Geoffrey Hinton, and Jeff Dean. Outra- geously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture- of-experts layer.arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06538, 2017. 3

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792,

    Uriel Singer, Adam Polyak, Thomas Hayes, Xi Yin, Jie An, Songyang Zhang, Qiyuan Hu, Harry Yang, Oron Ashual, Oran Gafni, et al. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792,

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equa- tions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020

    Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P Kingma, Ab- hishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equa- tions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020. 2

    2011 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Consistency models

    Yang Song, Prafulla Dhariwal, Mark Chen, and Ilya Sutskever. Consistency models. 2023. 1, 2

    2023

  37. [45]

    Makeany- thing: Harnessing diffusion transformers for multi- domain procedural sequence generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01572, 2025

    Yiren Song, Cheng Liu, and Mike Zheng Shou. Makeany- thing: Harnessing diffusion transformers for multi- domain procedural sequence generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.01572, 2025. 2

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Omniconsis- tency: Learning style-agnostic consistency from paired styl- ization data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18445, 2025

    Yiren Song, Cheng Liu, and Mike Zheng Shou. Omniconsis- tency: Learning style-agnostic consistency from paired styl- ization data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.18445, 2025. 2

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Fourier diffusion models: A method to control mtf and nps in score-based stochastic image generation.IEEE transactions on medical imaging,

    Matthew Tivnan, Jacopo Teneggi, Tzu-Cheng Lee, Ruoqiao Zhang, Kirsten Boedeker, Liang Cai, Grace J Gang, Jeremias Sulam, and J Webster Stayman. Fourier diffusion models: A method to control mtf and nps in score-based stochastic image generation.IEEE transactions on medical imaging,

  40. [48]

    Learning to route

    Asaf Valadarsky, Michael Schapira, Dafna Shahaf, and Aviv Tamar. Learning to route. InProceedings of the 16th ACM workshop on hot topics in networks, pages 185–191, 2017. 3

    2017

  41. [49]

    Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025

    Team Wan, Ang Wang, Baole Ai, Bin Wen, Chaojie Mao, Chen-Wei Xie, Di Chen, Feiwu Yu, Haiming Zhao, Jianx- iao Yang, et al. Wan: Open and advanced large-scale video generative models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.20314, 2025. 8

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Score jacobian chaining: Lifting pretrained 2d diffusion models for 3d generation

    Haochen Wang, Xiaodan Du, Jiahao Li, Raymond A Yeh, and Greg Shakhnarovich. Score jacobian chaining: Lifting pretrained 2d diffusion models for 3d generation. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 12619–12629, 2023. 2 10

    2023

  43. [51]

    Vt- bench: Comprehensive benchmark suite towards real-world virtual try-on models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19571,

    Hu Xiaobin, Liang Yujie, Luo Donghao, Peng Xu, Zhang Jiangning, Zhu Junwei, Wang Chengjie, and Fu Yanwei. Vt- bench: Comprehensive benchmark suite towards real-world virtual try-on models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19571,

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Learning in the frequency domain

    Kai Xu, Minghai Qin, Fei Sun, Yuhao Wang, Yen-Kuang Chen, and Fengbo Ren. Learning in the frequency domain. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 1740–1749, 2020. 3

    2020

  45. [53]

    Ip- adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to- image diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721,

    Hu Ye, Jun Zhang, Sibo Liu, Xiao Han, and Wei Yang. Ip- adapter: Text compatible image prompt adapter for text-to- image diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06721,

    arXiv

  46. [54]

    Don’t forget the nonlinearity: Unlocking activation functions in efficient fine- tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.13240, 2025

    Bo Yin, Xingyi Yang, and Xinchao Wang. Don’t forget the nonlinearity: Unlocking activation functions in efficient fine- tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.13240, 2025. 3

    2025

  47. [55]

    Dmfft: im- proving the generation quality of diffusion models using fast fourier transform.Scientific Reports, 15(1):10200, 2025

    Cuihong Yu, Cheng Han, and Chao Zhang. Dmfft: im- proving the generation quality of diffusion models using fast fourier transform.Scientific Reports, 15(1):10200, 2025. 3

    2025

  48. [56]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 1, 2, 3

    2023

  49. [57]

    Adalora: Adaptive budget alloca- tion for parameter-efficient fine-tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10512, 2023

    Qingru Zhang, Minshuo Chen, Alexander Bukharin, Nikos Karampatziakis, Pengcheng He, Yu Cheng, Weizhu Chen, and Tuo Zhao. Adalora: Adaptive budget alloca- tion for parameter-efficient fine-tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10512, 2023. 3, 5

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Task- customized mixture of adapters for general image fusion

    Pengfei Zhu, Yang Sun, Bing Cao, and Qinghua Hu. Task- customized mixture of adapters for general image fusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 7099–7108, 2024. 3 11 FeRA: Frequency-Energy Constrained Routing for Ef...

    2024

  51. [59]

    The model is prompted to judge the stylistic attributes of the generated images.For transparency and reproducibility, we include the exact prompt used in all evaluations below

    MLLM-Judge Prompt In experiment we evaluate stylistic fidelity(Style Score) us- ing an MLLM-based style assessor. The model is prompted to judge the stylistic attributes of the generated images.For transparency and reproducibility, we include the exact prompt used in all evalu...

  52. [60]

    Experiment Setting For clarity and reproducibility, we summarize the common training configuration used across all experiments in Ta- ble 4

  53. [61]

    Other Experiment Result 9.1. Text-to-Image Style Adaptation To further examine the generality of our training pipeline, we extend the text-to-image style adaptation experiments to multiple diffusion backbones with distinct latent reso- lutions, denoising trajectories, and text...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.